Most U.S. Hospitals Are Empty Soon They Might Be Closed For Good

Tens of thousands of health care workers across the United States are going without pay today, even as providers in the nation’s hot spots struggle to contain the coronavirus pandemic

This “tale of two hospitals” is a function of clumsy, if well-intentioned, federal and state directives to halt all non-emergency procedures, which appeared at first blush to be a reasonable precaution to limit unnecessary exposure and safeguard staff, beds and equipment.

But instead of merely preserving hospital beds and other resources, this heavy-handed injunction has created a burden of its own design: a historic number of empty beds in systems left untouched by the pandemic.

Those hospitals have resorted to unprecedented levels of furloughs to stave off temporary budget shortfalls, but industry and economic trends point to more lasting outcomes unless immediate action is taken.

At 18 percent of the U.S. economy, health care is a $3.6 trillion industry annually. By barring all elective surgeries, which covers a huge array of operations, like knee reconstructions or even cancer biopsies, hospitals have been denied billions in revenue in just the last month alone.

Outpatient services account for half of all hospital revenue, which means hospitals are now making, and spending, half what they were this time last year.

Trump touts White House renovations, says building was in ‘very bad condition’

Federal judge rules Trump admin plan to cut FEMA workforce in half is unlawful

Trump says China ‘spies’ on US after report ties Chinese imagery to Iran strike

California football coach arrested after students make disturbing discovery at school

Maryland dad blamed ‘Satan’ after 2-month-old daughter died from horrific head trauma

Creepy ‘Cat in the Hat’ trend targets schools as costumed figure allegedly chases teen girl

Missing 70-year-old hiker rescued after disappearing for a week in remote national park

Trump offers update on White House press secretary sweepstakes

Trump unloads on AOC, Mamdani for laughing during sacred 9/11 ceremony at Ground Zero

GOP gov candidate recounts miracle water landing as dispatch audio reveals desperate search for sinking plane

Trump says Lindsay Clancy case is a ‘state situation’ following attorney’s pardon plea

Charlie Kirk statue defaced with red paint, Jesus crossed out days after 1-year mark of assassination

Arrest rips apart media narrative on death of Black woman found hanging from Mississippi tree

Trump tells Zelenskyy to stop doing ‘one thing’ during attacks on Russia

Election chaos in this red state just got even stranger for Republicans after Supreme Court ruling

It’s not surprising, then, that the industry shed a record 43,000 health care workers in the first month of this crisis. Experts expect equal or greater layoffs this month, when the sustained forbearance has made revenue even more urgent.

Even before this crisis, one in four rural hospitals were vulnerable to closure. Now, many of these rural systems have more empty beds than ever before.

It doesn’t take an economist to understand the underlying economics here. And it won’t just be rural health care that will suffer—hospitals in every corner of the country might close for good.

The coronavirus will continue to spread throughout the United States, but our ability to treat and prevent its transmission will be severely constrained if as-yet-unaffected hospitals resort to mass layoffs. We need to sustain robust staffing in every corner of this country—and prohibiting elective surgeries outright is wildly counterproductive.

Understand: The availability of clinicians in hot spots like New York City, New Orleans and Detroit is no more an urgent public health crisis than health care staffing everywhere else because when this is over these patients will still require dialysis, chemotherapy and other life-saving treatments.

Health care has historically weathered economic downturns in stride because people get sick even in depressions, but this is unlike previous slumps. In the past 30 years, there have been only four months where the industry destroyed jobs. What used to be the worst case, in 2003, was just one-quarter of the losses experienced in March.

Hospitals are in the business of treating patients, but few are any more—which means more furloughs are ahead unless and until hospitals are allowed to perform their basic function: provide health care.