Mitt Romney Says He ‘Agonized’ over Impeachment: ‘I Hoped Beyond Hope’ I Wouldn’t Find Him Guilty

Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT), who voted to convict President Trump for abuse of power last week, claimed on Sunday that he “agonized” over the responsibility that came with his decision and said he had “hoped beyond hope” he would not find President Trump guilty.

Speaking to KSL’s Sunday Edition during the weekend, Romney, who asserted last week that the president “committed an act so extreme and egregious that it rises to the level of a high crime and misdemeanor,” said he “agonized over the responsibility that ultimately would come [his] way” and proclaimed that he “hoped beyond hope” he would not find Trump guilty.

“Well, I took my responsibility exactly as the Constitution defines it and as the oath I took requires it,” Romney told KSL’s Doug Wright, again citing his oath before God, “which is what I was sworn before God to apply impartial justice as a Senate juror.”

The Utah senator continued to defend his decision, proclaiming that he “thoroughly studied” the evidence, which moved him to vote to convict the president.

Abdul El-Sayed touts ‘whole a–’ medical credentials while defending sex changes for children

Any ‘Iran Deal’ Must Include Justice for American Victims of State-Sponsored Terrorism

Liberal Donors, Corporate Interests Conspire to Help Left-Leaning Republicans in Deep Red Wyoming

White House unloads on violent ‘criminal alien’ nabbed after investigators uncover election offense

NBC beefs up security at ‘Today’ studio after Nancy Guthrie kidnapping, intruder incident

What does ‘Never Forget’ mean for a generation with no memory of 9/11?

If the US cuts funding to Israel, could Jordan and Egypt be next?

Have the Left and Right switched places on globalization and consumerism?

PBS’s ‘Marble Hall Murders’ features lovely locales, artful acting, and transfixing twists

Trump says he would ‘love’ to see Ireland unified as one nation

New York City Council pushes bill to take press passes away from ‘Mangionistas’

Newsom concedes California’s housing crisis is fair criticism

‘Disgusting Excuse for a Journalist’: NBC Boston Ripped to Shreds Over Hit Piece on Clancy Holdout Juror

We Didn’t Get This Angry Because Americans Changed: We Got This Angry Because Washington Did

Fox News Legal Analyst Jonathan Turley Thoroughly Dismantles Lindsay Clancy’s Attorney After Debate Challenge

“I agonized over the responsibility that ultimately would come my way,” Romney said. “I hoped beyond hope that I would not have to find him guilty of what had been alleged.”

“They didn’t want to provide any information for those of us who were having a responsibility to provide impartial justice,” Romney said of the refusal to allow additional witnesses to testify.

He also attributed his decision to “family tradition,” citing his dad, whom he described as “a person who stood by his word and did exactly what he thought was right regardless of the consequence.”

“And that is a family tradition which I hold dear,” he said.

“I did believe that I was doing exactly what I swore I would do,” he added.

Romney’s decision to convict the president earned him high praise from high-profile Democrats, including Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), who praised her colleague’s “courage” during Friday’s Democrat debate in New Hampshire.

“There was a lot of courage you saw from very few people,” Klobuchar said. “There was courage from Doug Jones, our friends from Alabama that took that tough vote. There was courage from Mitt Romney, who took a very, very difficult vote”:

Amy Klobuchar knocks idea of being a "cool newcomer": "We have a newcomer in the White House, and look where it got us. I think having some experience is a good thing." https://t.co/Rhy9aOaDTU #DemDebate pic.twitter.com/cqusxWYJfl

— ABC News (@ABC) February 8, 2020