Mitt Romney Says He ‘Agonized’ over Impeachment: ‘I Hoped Beyond Hope’ I Wouldn’t Find Him Guilty

Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT), who voted to convict President Trump for abuse of power last week, claimed on Sunday that he “agonized” over the responsibility that came with his decision and said he had “hoped beyond hope” he would not find President Trump guilty.

Speaking to KSL’s Sunday Edition during the weekend, Romney, who asserted last week that the president “committed an act so extreme and egregious that it rises to the level of a high crime and misdemeanor,” said he “agonized over the responsibility that ultimately would come [his] way” and proclaimed that he “hoped beyond hope” he would not find Trump guilty.

“Well, I took my responsibility exactly as the Constitution defines it and as the oath I took requires it,” Romney told KSL’s Doug Wright, again citing his oath before God, “which is what I was sworn before God to apply impartial justice as a Senate juror.”

The Utah senator continued to defend his decision, proclaiming that he “thoroughly studied” the evidence, which moved him to vote to convict the president.

Trump returns to National Prayer Breakfast as faith takes center stage in second term

Republican who said Sen Cassidy ‘sucks,’ gets Trump endorsement after ditching Senate bid for House run

Teachers union leaders spent thousands at swanky resorts

Bodycam shows NYPD officer shooting man with knife as Mamdani calls for no criminal charges

Georgia GOP Rep Barry Loudermilk to retire, adding to wave of House exits

More than 200 people evaluated in Tennessee after carbon monoxide leak infiltrates university facility

FBI arrests 55 in massive drug ring with alleged China supplier flooding US streets with fentanyl

Hochul primary challenger picks democratic socialist, once arrested for harassment, as running mate

DC Democrats Turn Their Backs on the Clintons: ‘They Bring Nothing But Baggage’

Massive student immigration protest turns violent in downtown LA; dispersal order issued: police

Government lawyer who told judge ‘this job sucks’ sent back to DHS

Democrats say Clintons’ agreement to testify undercuts subpoena push, won’t bring new Epstein answers

Baltimore’s progressive mayor calls reporter ‘racist’ in heated exchange over luxury taxpayer vehicle

Joseph Gordon-Levitt slams Big Tech for sextortion, threats to children while calling for key internet reform

New York subway hearing erupts as MTA boss snaps ‘shut up’ amid grilling over guards letting fare jumpers walk

“I agonized over the responsibility that ultimately would come my way,” Romney said. “I hoped beyond hope that I would not have to find him guilty of what had been alleged.”

“They didn’t want to provide any information for those of us who were having a responsibility to provide impartial justice,” Romney said of the refusal to allow additional witnesses to testify.

He also attributed his decision to “family tradition,” citing his dad, whom he described as “a person who stood by his word and did exactly what he thought was right regardless of the consequence.”

“And that is a family tradition which I hold dear,” he said.

“I did believe that I was doing exactly what I swore I would do,” he added.

Romney’s decision to convict the president earned him high praise from high-profile Democrats, including Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), who praised her colleague’s “courage” during Friday’s Democrat debate in New Hampshire.

“There was a lot of courage you saw from very few people,” Klobuchar said. “There was courage from Doug Jones, our friends from Alabama that took that tough vote. There was courage from Mitt Romney, who took a very, very difficult vote”:

Amy Klobuchar knocks idea of being a "cool newcomer": "We have a newcomer in the White House, and look where it got us. I think having some experience is a good thing." https://t.co/Rhy9aOaDTU #DemDebate pic.twitter.com/cqusxWYJfl

— ABC News (@ABC) February 8, 2020