Mitt Romney Says He ‘Agonized’ over Impeachment: ‘I Hoped Beyond Hope’ I Wouldn’t Find Him Guilty

Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT), who voted to convict President Trump for abuse of power last week, claimed on Sunday that he “agonized” over the responsibility that came with his decision and said he had “hoped beyond hope” he would not find President Trump guilty.

Speaking to KSL’s Sunday Edition during the weekend, Romney, who asserted last week that the president “committed an act so extreme and egregious that it rises to the level of a high crime and misdemeanor,” said he “agonized over the responsibility that ultimately would come [his] way” and proclaimed that he “hoped beyond hope” he would not find Trump guilty.

“Well, I took my responsibility exactly as the Constitution defines it and as the oath I took requires it,” Romney told KSL’s Doug Wright, again citing his oath before God, “which is what I was sworn before God to apply impartial justice as a Senate juror.”

The Utah senator continued to defend his decision, proclaiming that he “thoroughly studied” the evidence, which moved him to vote to convict the president.

Connecticut GOP accuses Democratic school board chairman of celebrating Charlie Kirk’s murder

Democratic donors reluctant to give to Biden’s presidential library: report

Charlie Kirk’s widow tells America: ‘You have no idea what you have unleashed’

Ivanka Trump Makes Rare TV Appearance to Honor Charlie Kirk

Legal analyst calls for more arrests in Charlie Kirk assassination

Former agents praise FBI and partners’ work on Kirk manhunt: ‘It’s very impressive’

Fact Check: Did Patrick Mahomes, Josh Allen, and Aaron Rodgers Donate to Charlie Kirk’s Family?

New York teacher suspended after celebrating Charlie Kirk’s assassination: ‘Good riddance to bad garbage’

Judge allows ICE to continue courthouse arrests in New York City following legal challenge

‘I Think It’s a RICO’: Trump Says ‘We’re Going to Look Into Soros’

Fox News Politics Newsletter: Ammo engravings reveal Kirk assassination motive

Jasmine Crockett Doubles Down on ‘Hitler’ Rhetoric in Wake of Charlie Kirk Assassination

Can Trump pull off RICO charges against Soros?

Flashlight, rifle, backpacks: prosecutors outline Ryan Routh’s alleged sniper setup

This billionaire could gain from the ‘anti-monopoly’ summit he’s sponsoring

“I agonized over the responsibility that ultimately would come my way,” Romney said. “I hoped beyond hope that I would not have to find him guilty of what had been alleged.”

“They didn’t want to provide any information for those of us who were having a responsibility to provide impartial justice,” Romney said of the refusal to allow additional witnesses to testify.

He also attributed his decision to “family tradition,” citing his dad, whom he described as “a person who stood by his word and did exactly what he thought was right regardless of the consequence.”

“And that is a family tradition which I hold dear,” he said.

“I did believe that I was doing exactly what I swore I would do,” he added.

Romney’s decision to convict the president earned him high praise from high-profile Democrats, including Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), who praised her colleague’s “courage” during Friday’s Democrat debate in New Hampshire.

“There was a lot of courage you saw from very few people,” Klobuchar said. “There was courage from Doug Jones, our friends from Alabama that took that tough vote. There was courage from Mitt Romney, who took a very, very difficult vote”:

Amy Klobuchar knocks idea of being a "cool newcomer": "We have a newcomer in the White House, and look where it got us. I think having some experience is a good thing." https://t.co/Rhy9aOaDTU #DemDebate pic.twitter.com/cqusxWYJfl

— ABC News (@ABC) February 8, 2020