Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) on Monday became the first Republican senator to state that he would like John Bolton, former White House national security advisor, to testify at the Senate impeachment trial if subpoenaed.
“I would like to be able to hear from John Bolton. What the process is to make that happen, I don’t have an answer for you,” Romney told reporters on Capitol Hill when asked whether he would be open to hearing from Bolton.
In a posted statement, Bolton said that if called to do so at a Senate trial, “I am prepared to testify.”
As a key adviser to Trump, Bolton was close to the president’s dealings with Ukraine. The House of Representatives last month charged Trump with two articles of impeachment stemming from an alleged effort to pressure the Eastern European nation into launching a politically motivated investigation of Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden.
Two groups form in California governor’s race, but still no clear front-runner
Former Marvel actor working with Daily Wire for action movie produced by Ben Shapiro
Watch: The Priceless Look on This Sign Language Interpreter’s Face When She Has to Sign Hateful Islamic Verses She Probably Never Knew Existed
Denver mayor orders ICE agents detained if they ‘assault or shoot’ residents
Iran and US silent as negotiations in Geneva conclude without resolution
Travis County DA faces renewed ‘soft on crime’ criticism after career criminal charged with murder
Perfect Justice: Bill Gates Confesses to Russian Connection That Trump Was Falsely Accused of for Years
Nancy Guthrie neighbors’ Ring camera captures vehicles on possible route from crime scene
Family claims casino staff mistook veteran’s illness for intoxication, delaying care before his death
Retired Air Force Major Charged for Allegedly Training Chinese Military Pilots
New Texas Poll Is Out, and Stephen Colbert and Democratic Establishment Won’t Be Happy With It
Mamdani to meet with Trump in unannounced White House visit
China expands space footprint in Latin America, raising military alarms in America’s backyard
Biden FBI spied on Susie Wiles during Trump’s campaign
GOP pushes to hold sanctuary jurisdictions’ ‘feet to the fire’ in state where Laken Riley was killed
Bolton said during the impeachment hearings he would not testify before the House Intelligence Committee unless he was first subpoenaed by the committee and then ordered by a judge to defy Trump’s wishes by appearing before Congress.
The legal and constitutional struggle over Bolton’s possible House testimony went unresolved, he noted in his statement. Bolton said:
The House has concluded its constitutional responsibility by adopting articles of impeachment related to the Ukraine matter. It now falls to the Senate to fulfill its constitutional obligation to try impeachments, and it does not appear possible that a final judicial resolution of the still-unanswered constitutional questions can be obtained before the Senate acts.
Accordingly, since my testimony is once again at issue, I have had to resolve the serious competing issues as best I could, based on careful consideration and study. I have concluded that, if the Senate issues a subpoena for my testimony, I am prepared to testify.
Bolton’s statement comes after Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) reaffirmed he has no plans to invite four current and former White House officials to testify as part of the trial, despite demands from his minority counterpart, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY). House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has refused to send the impeachment articles to the Senate, claiming those on Schumer’s witness list must be heard to ensure a “fair” trial.
Two groups form in California governor’s race, but still no clear front-runner
Former Marvel actor working with Daily Wire for action movie produced by Ben Shapiro
Watch: The Priceless Look on This Sign Language Interpreter’s Face When She Has to Sign Hateful Islamic Verses She Probably Never Knew Existed
Denver mayor orders ICE agents detained if they ‘assault or shoot’ residents
Iran and US silent as negotiations in Geneva conclude without resolution
Travis County DA faces renewed ‘soft on crime’ criticism after career criminal charged with murder
Perfect Justice: Bill Gates Confesses to Russian Connection That Trump Was Falsely Accused of for Years
Nancy Guthrie neighbors’ Ring camera captures vehicles on possible route from crime scene
Family claims casino staff mistook veteran’s illness for intoxication, delaying care before his death
Retired Air Force Major Charged for Allegedly Training Chinese Military Pilots
New Texas Poll Is Out, and Stephen Colbert and Democratic Establishment Won’t Be Happy With It
Mamdani to meet with Trump in unannounced White House visit
China expands space footprint in Latin America, raising military alarms in America’s backyard
Biden FBI spied on Susie Wiles during Trump’s campaign
GOP pushes to hold sanctuary jurisdictions’ ‘feet to the fire’ in state where Laken Riley was killed
“We’ve heard it claimed that the same House Democrats who botched their own process should get to reach over here into the Senate and dictate our process,” McConnell said in a blistering floor speech last week.
The Republican added:
Let me clarify Senate rules and Senate history for those who may be confused. First, about this fantasy that the Speaker of the House will get to hand-design the trial proceedings in the Senate, that’s obviously a non-starter.
“The House went ahead without witnesses, and they didn’t pursue the witnesses in court,” he has said of the request. “They just blew right through that and accused the president of doing something improper by simply invoking executive privilege, which every president has done.”
Story cited here.
