A federal judge on Monday ruled in favor of House Democrats in their efforts to obtain President Donald Trump’s financial records, marking the first legal victory for Democrats as the Trump administration stonewalls their attempts at congressional oversight.
“It is not for the court to question whether the Committee’s actions are truly motivated by political considerations.” Judge Amit Mehta wrote in a ruling Monday. “Accordingly, the court will enter judgment in favor of the Oversight Committee.”
President Trump and the Trump Organization filed suit against the Democratic chairman of the House Oversight Committee, Rep. Elijah Cummings, last month, seeking relief from his subpoena request for the president’s financial records.
The court also denied their request for a stay pending appeal.
The president and his legal team decried Democrats’ efforts to obtain Trump’s financial information as an “all-out political war,” in which “subpoenas are their weapon of choice.”
‘So Look…’: El-Sayed Answers Whether a ‘Jewish Zionist’ Has a Place in the New Democratic Party
Bombshell: CNN’s Entire Newsroom May End up Working for Elon Musk as Paramount-WB Merger Steamrolls Lefties
Biden-appointed judge hands Letitia James setback in latest Trump legal clash
Florida deputies taser sword-wielding burglary suspect, video shows
Top public university’s ‘LGBTQ+ lab’ hit with race-bias complaint amid $700K in Trump-era federal funding
Texas triple murderer uses last words before execution to send message to death row inmates
Ken Paxton Shuts Down Alleged Chinese ‘Birth Tourism Center’ Ahead of Race Against Talarico
Trump-Xi summit could hold key to lower gas prices, GOP chairman says
Italy Scrambles Warships Toward Red Sea as Houthis Close in on Global Shipping Chokepoint
Federal appeals court deals blow to Trump deportation agenda
MN Dem Sen candidate in hot seat over upcoming event hosted by man enveloped in fraud scandal: ‘Red flags’
Thune’s midterm crossroads: Keep the Senate working or let candidates campaign
Republicans face brutal midterm headwinds. Six forces could help them defy history.
Parents accuse Oregon hospital of making them drive dead baby home to Seattle: lawsuit
Tennessee cops raided man’s home after he criticized officer for speeding: lawsuit
But in his order on Monday, Judge Mehta, an Obama appointee, sided with Democrats, whom he wrote have “facially valid legislative purposes” to obtain information requested in their subpoena of Mazars USA, the president’s former accounting firm.
“It is simply not fathomable that a Constitution that grants Congress the power to remove a President for reasons including criminal behavior would deny Congress the power to investigate him for unlawful conduct — past or present — even without formally opening an impeachment inquiry,” Mehta wrote.
Cummings served a subpoena to Mazars USA in April seeking ten years of the president’s financial records in an effort to corroborate elements of Trump’s former personal attorney Michael Cohen’s testimony before the committee. Cohen claimed that Trump had defrauded insurance companies by misrepresenting the value of his assets.
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff, a California Democrat whose committee is also seeking information from the Trump administration, reacted to news of the decision, calling it “very important.”
‘So Look…’: El-Sayed Answers Whether a ‘Jewish Zionist’ Has a Place in the New Democratic Party
Bombshell: CNN’s Entire Newsroom May End up Working for Elon Musk as Paramount-WB Merger Steamrolls Lefties
Biden-appointed judge hands Letitia James setback in latest Trump legal clash
Florida deputies taser sword-wielding burglary suspect, video shows
Top public university’s ‘LGBTQ+ lab’ hit with race-bias complaint amid $700K in Trump-era federal funding
Texas triple murderer uses last words before execution to send message to death row inmates
Ken Paxton Shuts Down Alleged Chinese ‘Birth Tourism Center’ Ahead of Race Against Talarico
Trump-Xi summit could hold key to lower gas prices, GOP chairman says
Italy Scrambles Warships Toward Red Sea as Houthis Close in on Global Shipping Chokepoint
Federal appeals court deals blow to Trump deportation agenda
MN Dem Sen candidate in hot seat over upcoming event hosted by man enveloped in fraud scandal: ‘Red flags’
Thune’s midterm crossroads: Keep the Senate working or let candidates campaign
Republicans face brutal midterm headwinds. Six forces could help them defy history.
Parents accuse Oregon hospital of making them drive dead baby home to Seattle: lawsuit
Tennessee cops raided man’s home after he criticized officer for speeding: lawsuit
“It shows that the courts understand the importance of oversight even if the president does not,” Schiff said.
“Mazars USA will respect the legal process and fully comply with its legal obligations. We believe strongly in the ethical and professional rules and regulations that govern our industry, our work and our client interactions. As a matter of firm policy and professional rules we do not comment on the work we conduct for our clients,” Mazars USA spokesperson Jennifer Farrington told ABC News on Monday.
Speaking to reporters as he departed the White House Monday evening, Trump said that he plans to appeal the judge’s ruling.
“Yeah, they’ll appeal it. They’ll appeal it. Sure they’ll appeal it,” Trump said.
The president “disagreed” with the ruling and slammed the judge for being appointed by Obama.
“We disagree with that ruling. It’s crazy because you look at this never happened to any other president. They’re trying to get a redo. Trying to get what we used to call in school a do-over and if you look, you know, we had no collusion, we had no obstruction. We had no nothing,” Trump said.
‘So Look…’: El-Sayed Answers Whether a ‘Jewish Zionist’ Has a Place in the New Democratic Party
Bombshell: CNN’s Entire Newsroom May End up Working for Elon Musk as Paramount-WB Merger Steamrolls Lefties
Biden-appointed judge hands Letitia James setback in latest Trump legal clash
Florida deputies taser sword-wielding burglary suspect, video shows
Top public university’s ‘LGBTQ+ lab’ hit with race-bias complaint amid $700K in Trump-era federal funding
Texas triple murderer uses last words before execution to send message to death row inmates
Ken Paxton Shuts Down Alleged Chinese ‘Birth Tourism Center’ Ahead of Race Against Talarico
Trump-Xi summit could hold key to lower gas prices, GOP chairman says
Italy Scrambles Warships Toward Red Sea as Houthis Close in on Global Shipping Chokepoint
Federal appeals court deals blow to Trump deportation agenda
MN Dem Sen candidate in hot seat over upcoming event hosted by man enveloped in fraud scandal: ‘Red flags’
Thune’s midterm crossroads: Keep the Senate working or let candidates campaign
Republicans face brutal midterm headwinds. Six forces could help them defy history.
Parents accuse Oregon hospital of making them drive dead baby home to Seattle: lawsuit
Tennessee cops raided man’s home after he criticized officer for speeding: lawsuit
“The Democrats were very upset with the Mueller report as perhaps they should be, but, I mean the country is very happy about it because there was never anything like that. They’re trying to get a do-over or redo. You can’t do that as far as the financials are concerned it’s totally the wrong decision by obviously an Obama appointed he was a recent Obama appointed judge,” Trump added.
The House Oversight Committee was not immediately available for comment. The Trump Organization and lawyers for President Trump – both plaintiffs in the case – did not immediately respond to request for comment.
Story cited here.
