News Opinons Politics

Judge Rules in Favor of House Democrats’ Efforts to Obtain Trump’s Financial Records

A federal judge on Monday ruled in favor of House Democrats in their efforts to obtain President Donald Trump’s financial records, marking the first legal victory for Democrats as the Trump administration stonewalls their attempts at congressional oversight.

“It is not for the court to question whether the Committee’s actions are truly motivated by political considerations.” Judge Amit Mehta wrote in a ruling Monday. “Accordingly, the court will enter judgment in favor of the Oversight Committee.”

President Trump and the Trump Organization filed suit against the Democratic chairman of the House Oversight Committee, Rep. Elijah Cummings, last month, seeking relief from his subpoena request for the president’s financial records.


The court also denied their request for a stay pending appeal.

The president and his legal team decried Democrats’ efforts to obtain Trump’s financial information as an “all-out political war,” in which “subpoenas are their weapon of choice.”


Fox News True Crime Newsletter: Bahamas missing woman mystery, Athena Strand bodycam, Gilgo Beach guilty plea
Kamala Harris Gives the Surest Sign Yet She’s Running in 2028 with Al Sharpton Event Speech
Teens suspected of murdering congressional intern linked by DNA on shell casings, prosecutors say
LATE BREAKING: Trump Issues Shockingly Graphic Post Targeting Haitian Illegal Accused of Murdering Mother of 2
Bessent, Powell summon Wall Street CEOs for emergency meeting over Anthropic AI risks amid Pentagon dispute
Trump’s Labor Department takes another hit as inspector general accused of abusing role
FLASHBACK: Dems want to boot Trump with 25th amendment, but refused to do so under Biden
WATCH: America250 backdrop topples near Shapiro, Revolutionary War reenactors
Navy scraps Biden-era submarine contract as overhaul costs surge toward $3B
Unfortunate Video: Mamdani Thought Walking Through NYC Was a Great Photo Op, Then People Noticed What Was Behind Him
Report: Roger Stone Stepped in and ‘Saved’ Tulsi Gabbard from Being Fired by Trump
Nation’s second-largest school district targeted by Trump over secretive trans policy
Video: Hunter Biden Hits New Rock Bottom, Agrees to Insane Cage Match Against Don Jr., Eric Trump
BREAKING IMPEACHMENT NEWS: Hearings on Tim Walz, Keith Ellison Impeachment to Begin Next Week
Artemis II crew closes in on Earth as mission ends with Pacific splashdown and more top headlines

See also  Iranian intelligence chief and militia commander among those killed in Israeli strikes

But in his order on Monday, Judge Mehta, an Obama appointee, sided with Democrats, whom he wrote have “facially valid legislative purposes” to obtain information requested in their subpoena of Mazars USA, the president’s former accounting firm.

“It is simply not fathomable that a Constitution that grants Congress the power to remove a President for reasons including criminal behavior would deny Congress the power to investigate him for unlawful conduct — past or present — even without formally opening an impeachment inquiry,” Mehta wrote.

Cummings served a subpoena to Mazars USA in April seeking ten years of the president’s financial records in an effort to corroborate elements of Trump’s former personal attorney Michael Cohen’s testimony before the committee. Cohen claimed that Trump had defrauded insurance companies by misrepresenting the value of his assets.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff, a California Democrat whose committee is also seeking information from the Trump administration, reacted to news of the decision, calling it “very important.”


Fox News True Crime Newsletter: Bahamas missing woman mystery, Athena Strand bodycam, Gilgo Beach guilty plea
Kamala Harris Gives the Surest Sign Yet She’s Running in 2028 with Al Sharpton Event Speech
Teens suspected of murdering congressional intern linked by DNA on shell casings, prosecutors say
LATE BREAKING: Trump Issues Shockingly Graphic Post Targeting Haitian Illegal Accused of Murdering Mother of 2
Bessent, Powell summon Wall Street CEOs for emergency meeting over Anthropic AI risks amid Pentagon dispute
Trump’s Labor Department takes another hit as inspector general accused of abusing role
FLASHBACK: Dems want to boot Trump with 25th amendment, but refused to do so under Biden
WATCH: America250 backdrop topples near Shapiro, Revolutionary War reenactors
Navy scraps Biden-era submarine contract as overhaul costs surge toward $3B
Unfortunate Video: Mamdani Thought Walking Through NYC Was a Great Photo Op, Then People Noticed What Was Behind Him
Report: Roger Stone Stepped in and ‘Saved’ Tulsi Gabbard from Being Fired by Trump
Nation’s second-largest school district targeted by Trump over secretive trans policy
Video: Hunter Biden Hits New Rock Bottom, Agrees to Insane Cage Match Against Don Jr., Eric Trump
BREAKING IMPEACHMENT NEWS: Hearings on Tim Walz, Keith Ellison Impeachment to Begin Next Week
Artemis II crew closes in on Earth as mission ends with Pacific splashdown and more top headlines

See also  Israel issues ‘urgent’ warning to Iranian civilians to ‘refrain’ from train travel

“It shows that the courts understand the importance of oversight even if the president does not,” Schiff said.

“Mazars USA will respect the legal process and fully comply with its legal obligations. We believe strongly in the ethical and professional rules and regulations that govern our industry, our work and our client interactions. As a matter of firm policy and professional rules we do not comment on the work we conduct for our clients,” Mazars USA spokesperson Jennifer Farrington told ABC News on Monday.

Speaking to reporters as he departed the White House Monday evening, Trump said that he plans to appeal the judge’s ruling.

“Yeah, they’ll appeal it. They’ll appeal it. Sure they’ll appeal it,” Trump said.

The president “disagreed” with the ruling and slammed the judge for being appointed by Obama.

“We disagree with that ruling. It’s crazy because you look at this never happened to any other president. They’re trying to get a redo. Trying to get what we used to call in school a do-over and if you look, you know, we had no collusion, we had no obstruction. We had no nothing,” Trump said.


Fox News True Crime Newsletter: Bahamas missing woman mystery, Athena Strand bodycam, Gilgo Beach guilty plea
Kamala Harris Gives the Surest Sign Yet She’s Running in 2028 with Al Sharpton Event Speech
Teens suspected of murdering congressional intern linked by DNA on shell casings, prosecutors say
LATE BREAKING: Trump Issues Shockingly Graphic Post Targeting Haitian Illegal Accused of Murdering Mother of 2
Bessent, Powell summon Wall Street CEOs for emergency meeting over Anthropic AI risks amid Pentagon dispute
Trump’s Labor Department takes another hit as inspector general accused of abusing role
FLASHBACK: Dems want to boot Trump with 25th amendment, but refused to do so under Biden
WATCH: America250 backdrop topples near Shapiro, Revolutionary War reenactors
Navy scraps Biden-era submarine contract as overhaul costs surge toward $3B
Unfortunate Video: Mamdani Thought Walking Through NYC Was a Great Photo Op, Then People Noticed What Was Behind Him
Report: Roger Stone Stepped in and ‘Saved’ Tulsi Gabbard from Being Fired by Trump
Nation’s second-largest school district targeted by Trump over secretive trans policy
Video: Hunter Biden Hits New Rock Bottom, Agrees to Insane Cage Match Against Don Jr., Eric Trump
BREAKING IMPEACHMENT NEWS: Hearings on Tim Walz, Keith Ellison Impeachment to Begin Next Week
Artemis II crew closes in on Earth as mission ends with Pacific splashdown and more top headlines

See also  Midwest nasty: ‘Hoosier nice’ gets swamped in Trump White House’s redistricting revenge tour against Indiana Republicans

“The Democrats were very upset with the Mueller report as perhaps they should be, but, I mean the country is very happy about it because there was never anything like that. They’re trying to get a do-over or redo. You can’t do that as far as the financials are concerned it’s totally the wrong decision by obviously an Obama appointed he was a recent Obama appointed judge,” Trump added.

The House Oversight Committee was not immediately available for comment. The Trump Organization and lawyers for President Trump – both plaintiffs in the case – did not immediately respond to request for comment.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter