A federal judge on Monday ruled in favor of House Democrats in their efforts to obtain President Donald Trump’s financial records, marking the first legal victory for Democrats as the Trump administration stonewalls their attempts at congressional oversight.
“It is not for the court to question whether the Committee’s actions are truly motivated by political considerations.” Judge Amit Mehta wrote in a ruling Monday. “Accordingly, the court will enter judgment in favor of the Oversight Committee.”
President Trump and the Trump Organization filed suit against the Democratic chairman of the House Oversight Committee, Rep. Elijah Cummings, last month, seeking relief from his subpoena request for the president’s financial records.
The court also denied their request for a stay pending appeal.
The president and his legal team decried Democrats’ efforts to obtain Trump’s financial information as an “all-out political war,” in which “subpoenas are their weapon of choice.”
Scathing report claims nation’s oldest labor union ‘betrayed’ MAGA members through ‘shocking’ spending
New pro-AI group backed by Trump allies plans $100M midterm spending push
Canadian Leaders Terrified ICE Will Deport People… From Canada
CCP-Tied Activists in the Midwest Desperately Fight to Keep Chinese Land Grabs Alive Near US Bases
Jet fuel spikes as airlines warn supplies could run dry within weeks
TSA Done for? Ex-Obama DHS Chief Says Shutdown Woes Could ‘Break the Back’ of TSA
Sen Mazie Hirono trolled for admitting Trump not ‘a king,’ and ‘never has been’
Trump-Deranged James Carville Claims President Not ‘Tough Enough’ to Finish Term
Executed killer’s chilling claim about what she felt during pickax murders still haunts retired FBI agent
Paxton dominates CPAC as GOP frets over Texas Senate runoff
DHS shutdown putting Americans at risk as World Cup security prep ‘significantly behind’: Sen Fetterman
African nation calls for Ilhan Omar to be extradited after Vance’s fraud claim
Australian Police Identify Suspect in Deadly Case of Koala Tied to Car and Dragged Down Street
’90 Day Fiance’ alum’s boyfriend beats Boca Bash attempted murder case he rips as ‘ridiculous’
Paul Ehrlich’s ‘Population Bomb’ Failure Shows the Dangers of Scientific Alarmism
But in his order on Monday, Judge Mehta, an Obama appointee, sided with Democrats, whom he wrote have “facially valid legislative purposes” to obtain information requested in their subpoena of Mazars USA, the president’s former accounting firm.
“It is simply not fathomable that a Constitution that grants Congress the power to remove a President for reasons including criminal behavior would deny Congress the power to investigate him for unlawful conduct — past or present — even without formally opening an impeachment inquiry,” Mehta wrote.
Cummings served a subpoena to Mazars USA in April seeking ten years of the president’s financial records in an effort to corroborate elements of Trump’s former personal attorney Michael Cohen’s testimony before the committee. Cohen claimed that Trump had defrauded insurance companies by misrepresenting the value of his assets.
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff, a California Democrat whose committee is also seeking information from the Trump administration, reacted to news of the decision, calling it “very important.”
Scathing report claims nation’s oldest labor union ‘betrayed’ MAGA members through ‘shocking’ spending
New pro-AI group backed by Trump allies plans $100M midterm spending push
Canadian Leaders Terrified ICE Will Deport People… From Canada
CCP-Tied Activists in the Midwest Desperately Fight to Keep Chinese Land Grabs Alive Near US Bases
Jet fuel spikes as airlines warn supplies could run dry within weeks
TSA Done for? Ex-Obama DHS Chief Says Shutdown Woes Could ‘Break the Back’ of TSA
Sen Mazie Hirono trolled for admitting Trump not ‘a king,’ and ‘never has been’
Trump-Deranged James Carville Claims President Not ‘Tough Enough’ to Finish Term
Executed killer’s chilling claim about what she felt during pickax murders still haunts retired FBI agent
Paxton dominates CPAC as GOP frets over Texas Senate runoff
DHS shutdown putting Americans at risk as World Cup security prep ‘significantly behind’: Sen Fetterman
African nation calls for Ilhan Omar to be extradited after Vance’s fraud claim
Australian Police Identify Suspect in Deadly Case of Koala Tied to Car and Dragged Down Street
’90 Day Fiance’ alum’s boyfriend beats Boca Bash attempted murder case he rips as ‘ridiculous’
Paul Ehrlich’s ‘Population Bomb’ Failure Shows the Dangers of Scientific Alarmism
“It shows that the courts understand the importance of oversight even if the president does not,” Schiff said.
“Mazars USA will respect the legal process and fully comply with its legal obligations. We believe strongly in the ethical and professional rules and regulations that govern our industry, our work and our client interactions. As a matter of firm policy and professional rules we do not comment on the work we conduct for our clients,” Mazars USA spokesperson Jennifer Farrington told ABC News on Monday.
Speaking to reporters as he departed the White House Monday evening, Trump said that he plans to appeal the judge’s ruling.
“Yeah, they’ll appeal it. They’ll appeal it. Sure they’ll appeal it,” Trump said.
The president “disagreed” with the ruling and slammed the judge for being appointed by Obama.
“We disagree with that ruling. It’s crazy because you look at this never happened to any other president. They’re trying to get a redo. Trying to get what we used to call in school a do-over and if you look, you know, we had no collusion, we had no obstruction. We had no nothing,” Trump said.
Scathing report claims nation’s oldest labor union ‘betrayed’ MAGA members through ‘shocking’ spending
New pro-AI group backed by Trump allies plans $100M midterm spending push
Canadian Leaders Terrified ICE Will Deport People… From Canada
CCP-Tied Activists in the Midwest Desperately Fight to Keep Chinese Land Grabs Alive Near US Bases
Jet fuel spikes as airlines warn supplies could run dry within weeks
TSA Done for? Ex-Obama DHS Chief Says Shutdown Woes Could ‘Break the Back’ of TSA
Sen Mazie Hirono trolled for admitting Trump not ‘a king,’ and ‘never has been’
Trump-Deranged James Carville Claims President Not ‘Tough Enough’ to Finish Term
Executed killer’s chilling claim about what she felt during pickax murders still haunts retired FBI agent
Paxton dominates CPAC as GOP frets over Texas Senate runoff
DHS shutdown putting Americans at risk as World Cup security prep ‘significantly behind’: Sen Fetterman
African nation calls for Ilhan Omar to be extradited after Vance’s fraud claim
Australian Police Identify Suspect in Deadly Case of Koala Tied to Car and Dragged Down Street
’90 Day Fiance’ alum’s boyfriend beats Boca Bash attempted murder case he rips as ‘ridiculous’
Paul Ehrlich’s ‘Population Bomb’ Failure Shows the Dangers of Scientific Alarmism
“The Democrats were very upset with the Mueller report as perhaps they should be, but, I mean the country is very happy about it because there was never anything like that. They’re trying to get a do-over or redo. You can’t do that as far as the financials are concerned it’s totally the wrong decision by obviously an Obama appointed he was a recent Obama appointed judge,” Trump added.
The House Oversight Committee was not immediately available for comment. The Trump Organization and lawyers for President Trump – both plaintiffs in the case – did not immediately respond to request for comment.
Story cited here.
