News Opinons Politics

Judge Rules in Favor of House Democrats’ Efforts to Obtain Trump’s Financial Records

A federal judge on Monday ruled in favor of House Democrats in their efforts to obtain President Donald Trump’s financial records, marking the first legal victory for Democrats as the Trump administration stonewalls their attempts at congressional oversight.

“It is not for the court to question whether the Committee’s actions are truly motivated by political considerations.” Judge Amit Mehta wrote in a ruling Monday. “Accordingly, the court will enter judgment in favor of the Oversight Committee.”

President Trump and the Trump Organization filed suit against the Democratic chairman of the House Oversight Committee, Rep. Elijah Cummings, last month, seeking relief from his subpoena request for the president’s financial records.


The court also denied their request for a stay pending appeal.

The president and his legal team decried Democrats’ efforts to obtain Trump’s financial information as an “all-out political war,” in which “subpoenas are their weapon of choice.”


Massachusetts Governor Signs New Law Blocking ICE Access to Several Locations
DSA Governor Candidate Hires OnlyFans Model as Deputy Campaign Manager
Florida man accused of killing nurse mom who helped him despite repeated arrests for threatening her: sheriff
Miss North Carolina USA pageant producers fire back after winner says she lost title over faith
WNBA Commissioner Announces League Is Reviewing Trans Inclusion After Former NBA Players Declare for Draft
Justice Department Settles With Pro-Life Father of 11 Whose Home They Busted Into
IN CHARTS: A visual breakdown of the Smithsonian’s billion-dollar taxpayer-funded budget
Socialists rising in Colorado? Send in the Marines, GOP nominee says
Why Stephen Miller thinks orders limiting birthright citizenship will go differently this time
EXCLUSIVE: Talarico caught on tape giggling about his church housing illegal immigrants set for deportation
Two dead, including infant, after boat capsizes in New York Harbor; 12 rescued
Teen accused of killing 10-year-old cousin Lily Peters may avoid November trial after new hearing scheduled
WATCH: Dems stand by Maine nominee hit with report he fathered children with his second cousin
Hawaii contractor nominated to construct GOP comeback after two-decade Democratic hold on governor’s mansion
Hawaii Gov. Josh Green cruises to Democratic primary win, sets up fall matchup with GOP nominee

See also  Senate committee advances Todd Blanche’s attorney general nomination

But in his order on Monday, Judge Mehta, an Obama appointee, sided with Democrats, whom he wrote have “facially valid legislative purposes” to obtain information requested in their subpoena of Mazars USA, the president’s former accounting firm.

“It is simply not fathomable that a Constitution that grants Congress the power to remove a President for reasons including criminal behavior would deny Congress the power to investigate him for unlawful conduct — past or present — even without formally opening an impeachment inquiry,” Mehta wrote.

Cummings served a subpoena to Mazars USA in April seeking ten years of the president’s financial records in an effort to corroborate elements of Trump’s former personal attorney Michael Cohen’s testimony before the committee. Cohen claimed that Trump had defrauded insurance companies by misrepresenting the value of his assets.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff, a California Democrat whose committee is also seeking information from the Trump administration, reacted to news of the decision, calling it “very important.”


Massachusetts Governor Signs New Law Blocking ICE Access to Several Locations
DSA Governor Candidate Hires OnlyFans Model as Deputy Campaign Manager
Florida man accused of killing nurse mom who helped him despite repeated arrests for threatening her: sheriff
Miss North Carolina USA pageant producers fire back after winner says she lost title over faith
WNBA Commissioner Announces League Is Reviewing Trans Inclusion After Former NBA Players Declare for Draft
Justice Department Settles With Pro-Life Father of 11 Whose Home They Busted Into
IN CHARTS: A visual breakdown of the Smithsonian’s billion-dollar taxpayer-funded budget
Socialists rising in Colorado? Send in the Marines, GOP nominee says
Why Stephen Miller thinks orders limiting birthright citizenship will go differently this time
EXCLUSIVE: Talarico caught on tape giggling about his church housing illegal immigrants set for deportation
Two dead, including infant, after boat capsizes in New York Harbor; 12 rescued
Teen accused of killing 10-year-old cousin Lily Peters may avoid November trial after new hearing scheduled
WATCH: Dems stand by Maine nominee hit with report he fathered children with his second cousin
Hawaii contractor nominated to construct GOP comeback after two-decade Democratic hold on governor’s mansion
Hawaii Gov. Josh Green cruises to Democratic primary win, sets up fall matchup with GOP nominee

See also  Races to watch in Michigan as establishment Democrats face off against challenges on their left flank

“It shows that the courts understand the importance of oversight even if the president does not,” Schiff said.

“Mazars USA will respect the legal process and fully comply with its legal obligations. We believe strongly in the ethical and professional rules and regulations that govern our industry, our work and our client interactions. As a matter of firm policy and professional rules we do not comment on the work we conduct for our clients,” Mazars USA spokesperson Jennifer Farrington told ABC News on Monday.

Speaking to reporters as he departed the White House Monday evening, Trump said that he plans to appeal the judge’s ruling.

“Yeah, they’ll appeal it. They’ll appeal it. Sure they’ll appeal it,” Trump said.

The president “disagreed” with the ruling and slammed the judge for being appointed by Obama.

“We disagree with that ruling. It’s crazy because you look at this never happened to any other president. They’re trying to get a redo. Trying to get what we used to call in school a do-over and if you look, you know, we had no collusion, we had no obstruction. We had no nothing,” Trump said.


Massachusetts Governor Signs New Law Blocking ICE Access to Several Locations
DSA Governor Candidate Hires OnlyFans Model as Deputy Campaign Manager
Florida man accused of killing nurse mom who helped him despite repeated arrests for threatening her: sheriff
Miss North Carolina USA pageant producers fire back after winner says she lost title over faith
WNBA Commissioner Announces League Is Reviewing Trans Inclusion After Former NBA Players Declare for Draft
Justice Department Settles With Pro-Life Father of 11 Whose Home They Busted Into
IN CHARTS: A visual breakdown of the Smithsonian’s billion-dollar taxpayer-funded budget
Socialists rising in Colorado? Send in the Marines, GOP nominee says
Why Stephen Miller thinks orders limiting birthright citizenship will go differently this time
EXCLUSIVE: Talarico caught on tape giggling about his church housing illegal immigrants set for deportation
Two dead, including infant, after boat capsizes in New York Harbor; 12 rescued
Teen accused of killing 10-year-old cousin Lily Peters may avoid November trial after new hearing scheduled
WATCH: Dems stand by Maine nominee hit with report he fathered children with his second cousin
Hawaii contractor nominated to construct GOP comeback after two-decade Democratic hold on governor’s mansion
Hawaii Gov. Josh Green cruises to Democratic primary win, sets up fall matchup with GOP nominee

See also  Don Lemon moves to dismiss case over Minnesota church protest on selective and vindictive prosecution claims

“The Democrats were very upset with the Mueller report as perhaps they should be, but, I mean the country is very happy about it because there was never anything like that. They’re trying to get a do-over or redo. You can’t do that as far as the financials are concerned it’s totally the wrong decision by obviously an Obama appointed he was a recent Obama appointed judge,” Trump added.

The House Oversight Committee was not immediately available for comment. The Trump Organization and lawyers for President Trump – both plaintiffs in the case – did not immediately respond to request for comment.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter