A federal judge in Oakland, California, is blocking a $1 billion portion of President Donald Trump’s $8 billion emergency budget for building the border wall.
The blocked project used $1 billion allocated by Congress for anti-drug accounts. The preliminary injunction will apply while the judge fully considers the lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which includes leaders from pro-migration and environmental groups, as well as from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
“Plaintiffs also have shown a likelihood of success as to their argument that Defendants fail to meet the ‘unforeseen military requirement’ condition for the reprogramming of funds under Section 8005,” said the judge, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam.
Urgent search underway for more than 20 people after Grand Canyon flash flood
DC public schools face special grand jury probe into attendance, truancy and graduation records
California bill recognizing 2 Islamic holidays nears Newsom’s desk
Tuskegee University president defends dress code amid criticism: ‘Raise the bar, students will reach it’
Trump indicates support for Christian-backed plan to help Canadian Jews escape antisemitism
Massive AI boom puts one of America’s oldest manufacturers on path to double in size, CEO says
Record High Americans Smoke Marijuana While Record Low Smoke Cigarettes
When DEI Becomes DIE: The Tragic Case Of Jason Arday
Huckleberry Finn And the New York Times’ Censor’s Logic
Hegseth Responds to Rumored 2028 Presidential Run
Bill Gates Claims ‘Bad Stuff Is Imminent’ as AI Accelerates
CBC Caves to Common Sense After Refusing to Refer to 9/11 as Terror Attack
Colorado city leader dies after collapsing on mountain hike: ‘Loss for our city’
Death toll rises to 38 after Russian strike on Ukrainian warehouse
Republicans tighten screws on Sherrill as noncitizen voter probe enters new phase
The administration’s “argument that the need for the requested border barrier construction funding was ‘unforeseen’ cannot logically be squared with the Administration’s multiple requests for funding for exactly that purpose dating back to at least early 2018,” he added.
The lawsuit also suggested that another $1.5 billion may be blocked because, in part, “the Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests in the areas known as El Paso Sector Project 1 and Yuma Sector Project 1.”
Gilliam was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014.
Urgent search underway for more than 20 people after Grand Canyon flash flood
DC public schools face special grand jury probe into attendance, truancy and graduation records
California bill recognizing 2 Islamic holidays nears Newsom’s desk
Tuskegee University president defends dress code amid criticism: ‘Raise the bar, students will reach it’
Trump indicates support for Christian-backed plan to help Canadian Jews escape antisemitism
Massive AI boom puts one of America’s oldest manufacturers on path to double in size, CEO says
Record High Americans Smoke Marijuana While Record Low Smoke Cigarettes
When DEI Becomes DIE: The Tragic Case Of Jason Arday
Huckleberry Finn And the New York Times’ Censor’s Logic
Hegseth Responds to Rumored 2028 Presidential Run
Bill Gates Claims ‘Bad Stuff Is Imminent’ as AI Accelerates
CBC Caves to Common Sense After Refusing to Refer to 9/11 as Terror Attack
Colorado city leader dies after collapsing on mountain hike: ‘Loss for our city’
Death toll rises to 38 after Russian strike on Ukrainian warehouse
Republicans tighten screws on Sherrill as noncitizen voter probe enters new phase
The case is Sierra Club, v. Trump, No. 19-cv-00892-HSG in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The decision can be read here.
Story cited here.
