A federal judge in Oakland, California, is blocking a $1 billion portion of President Donald Trump’s $8 billion emergency budget for building the border wall.
The blocked project used $1 billion allocated by Congress for anti-drug accounts. The preliminary injunction will apply while the judge fully considers the lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which includes leaders from pro-migration and environmental groups, as well as from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
“Plaintiffs also have shown a likelihood of success as to their argument that Defendants fail to meet the ‘unforeseen military requirement’ condition for the reprogramming of funds under Section 8005,” said the judge, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam.
Cuban exiles in Miami say ‘this is the end’ for communism as island teeters on collapse
Advantages and drawbacks emerge from Trump-backed US data center expansion
Far-left firebrand dodges questions over hiring bodyguard with criminal history
Iran war’s effect on interest remains a looming unknown
The reality TV kids are not alright
Man accused of shooting father in face with crossbow captured after snowy manhunt
Late Breaking: Deadly Chaos in NYC as SUV Driven by Man, 49, Plows Into Vehicles and Sends People Literally Flying
Feds charge 3 in $2.5b scheme to smuggle us AI tech to China using dummy servers
Missing University of Alabama student Jimmy Gracey found dead in Barcelona
Indiana University philanthropy group allegedly led fundraising training with Hamas-linked ‘sham charity’
ALERT: James Comey Subpoenaed by DOJ as ‘Grand Conspiracy’ Probe Into Political Lawfare Gains Momentum
NYC Teen Arrested in Horrific Attack on Mother of Three: ‘He Deserves Exactly What Is Coming to Him’
Developing: It Appears Joe Biden Kept Tribute to Child Rapist in His Oval Office – How It Got There Makes It Worse
Shot Fired as Anti-Abortion Advocates Preach the Gospel Outside Planned Parenthood
Republican Lawmakers Uneasy About $200 Billion Iran War Funding Request Reportedly in the Works
The administration’s “argument that the need for the requested border barrier construction funding was ‘unforeseen’ cannot logically be squared with the Administration’s multiple requests for funding for exactly that purpose dating back to at least early 2018,” he added.
The lawsuit also suggested that another $1.5 billion may be blocked because, in part, “the Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests in the areas known as El Paso Sector Project 1 and Yuma Sector Project 1.”
Gilliam was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014.
Cuban exiles in Miami say ‘this is the end’ for communism as island teeters on collapse
Advantages and drawbacks emerge from Trump-backed US data center expansion
Far-left firebrand dodges questions over hiring bodyguard with criminal history
Iran war’s effect on interest remains a looming unknown
The reality TV kids are not alright
Man accused of shooting father in face with crossbow captured after snowy manhunt
Late Breaking: Deadly Chaos in NYC as SUV Driven by Man, 49, Plows Into Vehicles and Sends People Literally Flying
Feds charge 3 in $2.5b scheme to smuggle us AI tech to China using dummy servers
Missing University of Alabama student Jimmy Gracey found dead in Barcelona
Indiana University philanthropy group allegedly led fundraising training with Hamas-linked ‘sham charity’
ALERT: James Comey Subpoenaed by DOJ as ‘Grand Conspiracy’ Probe Into Political Lawfare Gains Momentum
NYC Teen Arrested in Horrific Attack on Mother of Three: ‘He Deserves Exactly What Is Coming to Him’
Developing: It Appears Joe Biden Kept Tribute to Child Rapist in His Oval Office – How It Got There Makes It Worse
Shot Fired as Anti-Abortion Advocates Preach the Gospel Outside Planned Parenthood
Republican Lawmakers Uneasy About $200 Billion Iran War Funding Request Reportedly in the Works
The case is Sierra Club, v. Trump, No. 19-cv-00892-HSG in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The decision can be read here.
Story cited here.









