A federal judge in Oakland, California, is blocking a $1 billion portion of President Donald Trump’s $8 billion emergency budget for building the border wall.
The blocked project used $1 billion allocated by Congress for anti-drug accounts. The preliminary injunction will apply while the judge fully considers the lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which includes leaders from pro-migration and environmental groups, as well as from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
“Plaintiffs also have shown a likelihood of success as to their argument that Defendants fail to meet the ‘unforeseen military requirement’ condition for the reprogramming of funds under Section 8005,” said the judge, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam.
Netanyahu leads outcry over ICC judge who declared genocide in Gaza being awarded Nobel Peace Prize
Denver, Boulder ignored ICE detainers for migrants with child abuse, assault arrests, House GOP report reveals
Radical anti-Trump language riddles California voter guide on high-stakes ballot measure
Breaking: Legendary NFL Coach Mike Ditka Dies at 86
Breaking: Turbulence Forces NYC-Bound Plane to Land, 8 Hospitalized
Kohberger prosecutors say no as Idaho killer tries to boot judge who called him a ‘faceless coward’
Op-Ed from Iranian Kurd: Handing Iraqi Kurdistan to Tehran Would Be a Big Mistake
Jim Jordan Sums Up Progressive Platform in Scathing Takedown: ‘The Left Hates 2 Countries – America and Israel’
Severe turbulence diverts New York City flight to Miami, 8 injured
Could Trump play hardball to prevent an MLB lockout?
Trump cuts $810 million in federal spending he previously approved
Kathy Hochul counts on Mamdani to rev reelection turnout despite GOP attacks
Dem Congressional Candidate Claims She Was Raped While Repairing Campaign Signs and Hid from Her Husband for Days
US Attorney calls out ‘loud-mouth’ California Dems as feds step in with Skid Row drug bust: ‘They’re lunatics’
The powerful way American communities can benefit from the new tech boom revealed by data center CEO
The administration’s “argument that the need for the requested border barrier construction funding was ‘unforeseen’ cannot logically be squared with the Administration’s multiple requests for funding for exactly that purpose dating back to at least early 2018,” he added.
The lawsuit also suggested that another $1.5 billion may be blocked because, in part, “the Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests in the areas known as El Paso Sector Project 1 and Yuma Sector Project 1.”
Gilliam was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014.
Netanyahu leads outcry over ICC judge who declared genocide in Gaza being awarded Nobel Peace Prize
Denver, Boulder ignored ICE detainers for migrants with child abuse, assault arrests, House GOP report reveals
Radical anti-Trump language riddles California voter guide on high-stakes ballot measure
Breaking: Legendary NFL Coach Mike Ditka Dies at 86
Breaking: Turbulence Forces NYC-Bound Plane to Land, 8 Hospitalized
Kohberger prosecutors say no as Idaho killer tries to boot judge who called him a ‘faceless coward’
Op-Ed from Iranian Kurd: Handing Iraqi Kurdistan to Tehran Would Be a Big Mistake
Jim Jordan Sums Up Progressive Platform in Scathing Takedown: ‘The Left Hates 2 Countries – America and Israel’
Severe turbulence diverts New York City flight to Miami, 8 injured
Could Trump play hardball to prevent an MLB lockout?
Trump cuts $810 million in federal spending he previously approved
Kathy Hochul counts on Mamdani to rev reelection turnout despite GOP attacks
Dem Congressional Candidate Claims She Was Raped While Repairing Campaign Signs and Hid from Her Husband for Days
US Attorney calls out ‘loud-mouth’ California Dems as feds step in with Skid Row drug bust: ‘They’re lunatics’
The powerful way American communities can benefit from the new tech boom revealed by data center CEO
The case is Sierra Club, v. Trump, No. 19-cv-00892-HSG in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The decision can be read here.
Story cited here.
