News Opinons Politics

Judge Blocks Emergency $1 Billion for Border Wall

A federal judge in Oakland, California, is blocking a $1 billion portion of President Donald Trump’s $8 billion emergency budget for building the border wall.

The blocked project used $1 billion allocated by Congress for anti-drug accounts. The preliminary injunction will apply while the judge fully considers the lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which includes leaders from pro-migration and environmental groups, as well as from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

“Plaintiffs also have shown a likelihood of success as to their argument that Defendants fail to meet the ‘unforeseen military requirement’ condition for the reprogramming of funds under Section 8005,” said the judge, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam.



Trump: US doesn’t know who ‘the leader is in Iran’
20,000 teddy bear display on National Mall: ‘Bring Ukrainian children’ home
Guatemalan man charged with child porn possession released by Fairfax County despite ICE detainer, DHS says
Noncitizen ex-Kansas mayor pleads guilty to illegally voting multiple times
Mamdani Throws His Support Behind Arrested NYC Councilman
With Racism Increasingly Hard to Find, the SPLC Filled a Need the Media and Dems Couldn’t Live Without
Several shoppers caught in crossfire, wounded as shooting erupts inside busy Louisiana mall: police
Sex offender accused of 6 sex assaults in one day as crime surge rocks affluent valley
Defeated Virginia Republicans regroup for last chance fight to save House majority
DOJ charges 2 Chinese nationals who allegedly ran overseas cryptocurrency scam center targeting Americans
Lindsey Graham expects Trump’s Iran blockade to go ‘global’
Google engineer stole AI secrets for China, Senate hears in explosive testimony
Pat Fallon launches bid for House Oversight Committee chairman as James Comer’s term limit nears
Suspect accused of hurling chainsaw at deputies during chaotic stolen car chase caught on video
Trump Gives Navy a Shoot-on-Sight Order a Day After Firing its Leader
See also  Iran fires on multiple ships in Strait of Hormuz after ceasefire extension

The administration’s “argument that the need for the requested border barrier construction funding was ‘unforeseen’ cannot logically be squared with the Administration’s multiple requests for funding for exactly that purpose dating back to at least early 2018,” he added.

The lawsuit also suggested that another $1.5 billion may be blocked because, in part, “the Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests in the areas known as El Paso Sector Project 1 and Yuma Sector Project 1.”

Gilliam was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014.


Trump: US doesn’t know who ‘the leader is in Iran’
20,000 teddy bear display on National Mall: ‘Bring Ukrainian children’ home
Guatemalan man charged with child porn possession released by Fairfax County despite ICE detainer, DHS says
Noncitizen ex-Kansas mayor pleads guilty to illegally voting multiple times
Mamdani Throws His Support Behind Arrested NYC Councilman
With Racism Increasingly Hard to Find, the SPLC Filled a Need the Media and Dems Couldn’t Live Without
Several shoppers caught in crossfire, wounded as shooting erupts inside busy Louisiana mall: police
Sex offender accused of 6 sex assaults in one day as crime surge rocks affluent valley
Defeated Virginia Republicans regroup for last chance fight to save House majority
DOJ charges 2 Chinese nationals who allegedly ran overseas cryptocurrency scam center targeting Americans
Lindsey Graham expects Trump’s Iran blockade to go ‘global’
Google engineer stole AI secrets for China, Senate hears in explosive testimony
Pat Fallon launches bid for House Oversight Committee chairman as James Comer’s term limit nears
Suspect accused of hurling chainsaw at deputies during chaotic stolen car chase caught on video
Trump Gives Navy a Shoot-on-Sight Order a Day After Firing its Leader
See also  A look into the controversies surrounding the now-former secretary of labor

The case is Sierra Club, v. Trump, No. 19-cv-00892-HSG in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The decision can be read here.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter