A federal judge in Oakland, California, is blocking a $1 billion portion of President Donald Trump’s $8 billion emergency budget for building the border wall.
The blocked project used $1 billion allocated by Congress for anti-drug accounts. The preliminary injunction will apply while the judge fully considers the lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which includes leaders from pro-migration and environmental groups, as well as from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
“Plaintiffs also have shown a likelihood of success as to their argument that Defendants fail to meet the ‘unforeseen military requirement’ condition for the reprogramming of funds under Section 8005,” said the judge, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam.
Senate GOP rams through blueprint to bankroll ICE, Border Patrol through end of Trump era
Karen Bass meets with Trump at White House to push for LA wildfire relief after months of clashes
Man who pleaded guilty to raping 12-year-old relative is illegal immigrant from Honduras, DHS says
Manhattan DA’s office employee charged with sexual abuse after alleged incident on Queens subway
Florida prisoner laughs as judge sentences him to life for killing cellmate with pen: ‘You are amusing’
Florida man’s execution date set for killing 2, including small child
Senate GOP launches all-night vote-a-rama to fund ICE, Border Patrol through end of Trump’s term
Ilhan Omar Rages at Reporter Who Confronted Her About Financial Disclosure: ‘You’re Stupid’
Five things to know about Maine Senate hopeful Graham Platner
Judge Slams the Brakes on Democrats’ Virginia Redistricting, Rules Every Vote ‘Ineffective’
Video exposes disrepair lurking beneath Trump Kennedy Center as $257M renovation looms
‘Come On!’: Maury Povich Dismantles Joy Reid’s Absurd Claim That Dems Don’t ‘Play Politics’
Obama’s Shameless Hypocrisy Exposed as He Celebrates Democrats’ Virginia Power Grab
You Don’t Distrust Legacy Media Enough: Major Paper Shrugs at SPLC Paying Extremists – ‘FBI Does It Too’
Navy Secretary Fired ‘Effective Immediately’
The administration’s “argument that the need for the requested border barrier construction funding was ‘unforeseen’ cannot logically be squared with the Administration’s multiple requests for funding for exactly that purpose dating back to at least early 2018,” he added.
The lawsuit also suggested that another $1.5 billion may be blocked because, in part, “the Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests in the areas known as El Paso Sector Project 1 and Yuma Sector Project 1.”
Gilliam was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014.
Senate GOP rams through blueprint to bankroll ICE, Border Patrol through end of Trump era
Karen Bass meets with Trump at White House to push for LA wildfire relief after months of clashes
Man who pleaded guilty to raping 12-year-old relative is illegal immigrant from Honduras, DHS says
Manhattan DA’s office employee charged with sexual abuse after alleged incident on Queens subway
Florida prisoner laughs as judge sentences him to life for killing cellmate with pen: ‘You are amusing’
Florida man’s execution date set for killing 2, including small child
Senate GOP launches all-night vote-a-rama to fund ICE, Border Patrol through end of Trump’s term
Ilhan Omar Rages at Reporter Who Confronted Her About Financial Disclosure: ‘You’re Stupid’
Five things to know about Maine Senate hopeful Graham Platner
Judge Slams the Brakes on Democrats’ Virginia Redistricting, Rules Every Vote ‘Ineffective’
Video exposes disrepair lurking beneath Trump Kennedy Center as $257M renovation looms
‘Come On!’: Maury Povich Dismantles Joy Reid’s Absurd Claim That Dems Don’t ‘Play Politics’
Obama’s Shameless Hypocrisy Exposed as He Celebrates Democrats’ Virginia Power Grab
You Don’t Distrust Legacy Media Enough: Major Paper Shrugs at SPLC Paying Extremists – ‘FBI Does It Too’
Navy Secretary Fired ‘Effective Immediately’
The case is Sierra Club, v. Trump, No. 19-cv-00892-HSG in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The decision can be read here.
Story cited here.









