A federal judge in Oakland, California, is blocking a $1 billion portion of President Donald Trump’s $8 billion emergency budget for building the border wall.
The blocked project used $1 billion allocated by Congress for anti-drug accounts. The preliminary injunction will apply while the judge fully considers the lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which includes leaders from pro-migration and environmental groups, as well as from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
“Plaintiffs also have shown a likelihood of success as to their argument that Defendants fail to meet the ‘unforeseen military requirement’ condition for the reprogramming of funds under Section 8005,” said the judge, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam.
House oversight committee interviews former Epstein lawyer Darren Indyke
Billionaires pick their favorite in California’s packed governor’s race
Spring breakers caught on camera viciously attacking man in overnight street brawl
Thune warns Republicans against ‘counterproductive’ filibuster vote
Sweet, Sweet Justice: Principal Was Getting Away with Kiddie Porn, Then He Trashed Charlie Kirk and It All Came Crashing Down
Fox News ‘Antisemitism Exposed’ Newsletter: Democrats, Independents turn on Israel
VIDEOS: Bondi Briefing Descends Into Utter Chaos as Dems Storm Out When Chair Nukes Their Plan to Publicly Lynch AG
4 House Dems vote against Women’s History Museum bill over biological women-only amendment, Republican claims
70 House GOP members urge Trump admin on Chinese-vape crackdown
Newsom Gets Absolutely Wrecked After He Tries to Defend $114 Million Unfinished Butterfly Bridge and Claims FL and TX Have Same Problems
Breaking: Senate Committee Narrowly Advances Markwayne Mullin’s DHS Nomination with Help from Democrat
House Republicans warm up on spy bill renewal despite weaponization fears
What is the South Pars gas field in Iran Trump threatened to ‘destroy’?
Cyprus reconsiders ‘future of the British bases’ on island after UK bungled defense response
Inside Joe Kent’s abrupt fall as GOP backlash grows over antisemitism accusations, FBI probe
The administration’s “argument that the need for the requested border barrier construction funding was ‘unforeseen’ cannot logically be squared with the Administration’s multiple requests for funding for exactly that purpose dating back to at least early 2018,” he added.
The lawsuit also suggested that another $1.5 billion may be blocked because, in part, “the Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests in the areas known as El Paso Sector Project 1 and Yuma Sector Project 1.”
Gilliam was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014.
House oversight committee interviews former Epstein lawyer Darren Indyke
Billionaires pick their favorite in California’s packed governor’s race
Spring breakers caught on camera viciously attacking man in overnight street brawl
Thune warns Republicans against ‘counterproductive’ filibuster vote
Sweet, Sweet Justice: Principal Was Getting Away with Kiddie Porn, Then He Trashed Charlie Kirk and It All Came Crashing Down
Fox News ‘Antisemitism Exposed’ Newsletter: Democrats, Independents turn on Israel
VIDEOS: Bondi Briefing Descends Into Utter Chaos as Dems Storm Out When Chair Nukes Their Plan to Publicly Lynch AG
4 House Dems vote against Women’s History Museum bill over biological women-only amendment, Republican claims
70 House GOP members urge Trump admin on Chinese-vape crackdown
Newsom Gets Absolutely Wrecked After He Tries to Defend $114 Million Unfinished Butterfly Bridge and Claims FL and TX Have Same Problems
Breaking: Senate Committee Narrowly Advances Markwayne Mullin’s DHS Nomination with Help from Democrat
House Republicans warm up on spy bill renewal despite weaponization fears
What is the South Pars gas field in Iran Trump threatened to ‘destroy’?
Cyprus reconsiders ‘future of the British bases’ on island after UK bungled defense response
Inside Joe Kent’s abrupt fall as GOP backlash grows over antisemitism accusations, FBI probe
The case is Sierra Club, v. Trump, No. 19-cv-00892-HSG in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The decision can be read here.
Story cited here.









