A federal judge in Oakland, California, is blocking a $1 billion portion of President Donald Trump’s $8 billion emergency budget for building the border wall.
The blocked project used $1 billion allocated by Congress for anti-drug accounts. The preliminary injunction will apply while the judge fully considers the lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which includes leaders from pro-migration and environmental groups, as well as from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
“Plaintiffs also have shown a likelihood of success as to their argument that Defendants fail to meet the ‘unforeseen military requirement’ condition for the reprogramming of funds under Section 8005,” said the judge, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam.
Rescue expert warns FlyDubai hijacking attempt shows US, allies are ‘playing checkers’ against terror threat
‘Fraud’: Rubio Puts Woke So-Called Human Rights Group on Blast for Stunning US-Israel Hypocrisy
WATCH: CDC director discusses US government response to Russian plague concerns: ‘We are protected’
NYT Writer Claims ‘Combustible’ Sophie Cunningham Is ‘Just Too Much’ to Be Caitlin Clark’s Teammate
T-Mobile, AT&T Share Prices Plummet as Musk Makes Move to Shake Up the Industry
Disturbing Hunger-Killing AI ‘Yum Slop’ Trend Sweeps Through Restaurant Industry
Minnesota GOP chair blasts progressive group over KKK-themed sign shown during Black House speaker’s remarks
NYC councilwoman blasts Mamdani over Italian Heritage Month post praising ‘communist’
Poland’s police warn of a possible plot to attack Prime Minister Donald Tusk
‘LONG Overdue’: Trump Calls for Ukraine to Oust Zelenskyy
NYPD detective gives update on condition after illegal immigrant duo allegedly stabbed him 7 times
Watch: El-Sayed Still Can’t Condemn Dead Ayatollah Khamenei, Man Who Killed and Oppressed His Own People
Wage growth lags inflation, making the affordability crisis feel even more acute
China is in bed with the world’s worst regimes
A new biography revisits ‘No Country for Old Men’ author Cormac McCarthy
The administration’s “argument that the need for the requested border barrier construction funding was ‘unforeseen’ cannot logically be squared with the Administration’s multiple requests for funding for exactly that purpose dating back to at least early 2018,” he added.
The lawsuit also suggested that another $1.5 billion may be blocked because, in part, “the Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests in the areas known as El Paso Sector Project 1 and Yuma Sector Project 1.”
Gilliam was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014.
Rescue expert warns FlyDubai hijacking attempt shows US, allies are ‘playing checkers’ against terror threat
‘Fraud’: Rubio Puts Woke So-Called Human Rights Group on Blast for Stunning US-Israel Hypocrisy
WATCH: CDC director discusses US government response to Russian plague concerns: ‘We are protected’
NYT Writer Claims ‘Combustible’ Sophie Cunningham Is ‘Just Too Much’ to Be Caitlin Clark’s Teammate
T-Mobile, AT&T Share Prices Plummet as Musk Makes Move to Shake Up the Industry
Disturbing Hunger-Killing AI ‘Yum Slop’ Trend Sweeps Through Restaurant Industry
Minnesota GOP chair blasts progressive group over KKK-themed sign shown during Black House speaker’s remarks
NYC councilwoman blasts Mamdani over Italian Heritage Month post praising ‘communist’
Poland’s police warn of a possible plot to attack Prime Minister Donald Tusk
‘LONG Overdue’: Trump Calls for Ukraine to Oust Zelenskyy
NYPD detective gives update on condition after illegal immigrant duo allegedly stabbed him 7 times
Watch: El-Sayed Still Can’t Condemn Dead Ayatollah Khamenei, Man Who Killed and Oppressed His Own People
Wage growth lags inflation, making the affordability crisis feel even more acute
China is in bed with the world’s worst regimes
A new biography revisits ‘No Country for Old Men’ author Cormac McCarthy
The case is Sierra Club, v. Trump, No. 19-cv-00892-HSG in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The decision can be read here.
Story cited here.
