News Opinons Politics

Judge Blocks Emergency $1 Billion for Border Wall

A federal judge in Oakland, California, is blocking a $1 billion portion of President Donald Trump’s $8 billion emergency budget for building the border wall.

The blocked project used $1 billion allocated by Congress for anti-drug accounts. The preliminary injunction will apply while the judge fully considers the lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which includes leaders from pro-migration and environmental groups, as well as from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

“Plaintiffs also have shown a likelihood of success as to their argument that Defendants fail to meet the ‘unforeseen military requirement’ condition for the reprogramming of funds under Section 8005,” said the judge, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam.



FBI investigated former Capitol Police officer in Jan. 6 pipe bomb case, filings say
Trump administration makes major move to relieve ‘unfair burden’ on DHS workers as shutdown drags on
WATCH: Robert De Niro brushes off ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’ label hurled by critics
Fox News Poll: Broad anxiety about AI doesn’t extend to jobs
Trump’s address to the nation: Burning questions on Iran, the Strait of Hormuz, and NATO
Mike Johnson panned for ‘caving’ to John Thune in potential DHS shutdown offramp
NATO Was Built for a World That No Longer Exists – It’s Time for America to Act Accordingly
Artemis II vs. Apollo: Why this mission loops the moon but doesn’t land
Trump Fires Off Heated Message After Walking Out of Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Sauer cites ‘striking’ figures on secretive birth tourism in high-stakes SCOTUS case
Trump highlights ‘day of prayer’ at National Mall next month with faith leaders
Ted Bundy unmasked in decades-old teen murder as cold case finally solved by DNA: report
Trump Goes to Supreme Court for Oral Arguments in Unprecedented Move
Trump says Artemis II launch is sign US is ‘WINNING, in Space, on Earth, and everywhere’
Audio: Chief Justice John Roberts Appears Set to Throw a Wrench in Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Case
See also  Manufacturing has struggled since ‘Liberation Day’

The administration’s “argument that the need for the requested border barrier construction funding was ‘unforeseen’ cannot logically be squared with the Administration’s multiple requests for funding for exactly that purpose dating back to at least early 2018,” he added.

The lawsuit also suggested that another $1.5 billion may be blocked because, in part, “the Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests in the areas known as El Paso Sector Project 1 and Yuma Sector Project 1.”

Gilliam was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014.


FBI investigated former Capitol Police officer in Jan. 6 pipe bomb case, filings say
Trump administration makes major move to relieve ‘unfair burden’ on DHS workers as shutdown drags on
WATCH: Robert De Niro brushes off ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’ label hurled by critics
Fox News Poll: Broad anxiety about AI doesn’t extend to jobs
Trump’s address to the nation: Burning questions on Iran, the Strait of Hormuz, and NATO
Mike Johnson panned for ‘caving’ to John Thune in potential DHS shutdown offramp
NATO Was Built for a World That No Longer Exists – It’s Time for America to Act Accordingly
Artemis II vs. Apollo: Why this mission loops the moon but doesn’t land
Trump Fires Off Heated Message After Walking Out of Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Sauer cites ‘striking’ figures on secretive birth tourism in high-stakes SCOTUS case
Trump highlights ‘day of prayer’ at National Mall next month with faith leaders
Ted Bundy unmasked in decades-old teen murder as cold case finally solved by DNA: report
Trump Goes to Supreme Court for Oral Arguments in Unprecedented Move
Trump says Artemis II launch is sign US is ‘WINNING, in Space, on Earth, and everywhere’
Audio: Chief Justice John Roberts Appears Set to Throw a Wrench in Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Case
See also  Fox News poll gives Trump highest disapproval rating across both his terms

The case is Sierra Club, v. Trump, No. 19-cv-00892-HSG in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The decision can be read here.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter