News Opinons Politics

Judge Blocks Emergency $1 Billion for Border Wall

A federal judge in Oakland, California, is blocking a $1 billion portion of President Donald Trump’s $8 billion emergency budget for building the border wall.

The blocked project used $1 billion allocated by Congress for anti-drug accounts. The preliminary injunction will apply while the judge fully considers the lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which includes leaders from pro-migration and environmental groups, as well as from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

“Plaintiffs also have shown a likelihood of success as to their argument that Defendants fail to meet the ‘unforeseen military requirement’ condition for the reprogramming of funds under Section 8005,” said the judge, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam.



Powell reveals what it would take to step down from the Fed as pressure mounts
Trump pledges to uncover leftist groups countering ICE
Rubio Announced Major Shift in Foreign Aid Strategy Ahead of Venezuela Moves
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell Under Criminal Investigation
Seattle order to stop drug arrests ‘creating havoc’ for people fending off addicts surviving on theft: expert
LA protesters swarm U-Haul truck that drove through anti-Iranian regime gathering
Inside the lightning US strike that overwhelmed Venezuela’s defenses and seized Maduro
Alleged J6 Pipe Bomber Pleads Not Guilty After Reportedly Saying He Did it to Defend Biden’s Election Win
J6 Officer Praised By the Media Appears to Call for Violence Against ICE Agents
US raid in Venezuela signals deterrence to adversaries on three fronts, experts say
Meet Aaron Day, the 2016 spoiler who could sink Senate GOP hopes in New Hampshire
Rand Paul says Trump’s threat to bomb Iran ‘is not the answer’: Not the ‘job of the American government’
San Antonio ends its abortion travel fund after new state law, legal action
Los Angeles wildfire recovery enters second year as frustration and uncertainty linger
Smithsonian replaces Trump portrait display, strips Jan. 6 and impeachment references from accompanying text
See also  Minnesota ICE shooting ignites debate over federal officer immunity

The administration’s “argument that the need for the requested border barrier construction funding was ‘unforeseen’ cannot logically be squared with the Administration’s multiple requests for funding for exactly that purpose dating back to at least early 2018,” he added.

The lawsuit also suggested that another $1.5 billion may be blocked because, in part, “the Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests in the areas known as El Paso Sector Project 1 and Yuma Sector Project 1.”

Gilliam was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014.


Powell reveals what it would take to step down from the Fed as pressure mounts
Trump pledges to uncover leftist groups countering ICE
Rubio Announced Major Shift in Foreign Aid Strategy Ahead of Venezuela Moves
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell Under Criminal Investigation
Seattle order to stop drug arrests ‘creating havoc’ for people fending off addicts surviving on theft: expert
LA protesters swarm U-Haul truck that drove through anti-Iranian regime gathering
Inside the lightning US strike that overwhelmed Venezuela’s defenses and seized Maduro
Alleged J6 Pipe Bomber Pleads Not Guilty After Reportedly Saying He Did it to Defend Biden’s Election Win
J6 Officer Praised By the Media Appears to Call for Violence Against ICE Agents
US raid in Venezuela signals deterrence to adversaries on three fronts, experts say
Meet Aaron Day, the 2016 spoiler who could sink Senate GOP hopes in New Hampshire
Rand Paul says Trump’s threat to bomb Iran ‘is not the answer’: Not the ‘job of the American government’
San Antonio ends its abortion travel fund after new state law, legal action
Los Angeles wildfire recovery enters second year as frustration and uncertainty linger
Smithsonian replaces Trump portrait display, strips Jan. 6 and impeachment references from accompanying text
See also  Maria Machado praises Trump for his ‘courageous visions’ and ‘historical actions’

The case is Sierra Club, v. Trump, No. 19-cv-00892-HSG in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The decision can be read here.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter