News Opinons Politics

Judge Blocks Emergency $1 Billion for Border Wall

A federal judge in Oakland, California, is blocking a $1 billion portion of President Donald Trump’s $8 billion emergency budget for building the border wall.

The blocked project used $1 billion allocated by Congress for anti-drug accounts. The preliminary injunction will apply while the judge fully considers the lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which includes leaders from pro-migration and environmental groups, as well as from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

“Plaintiffs also have shown a likelihood of success as to their argument that Defendants fail to meet the ‘unforeseen military requirement’ condition for the reprogramming of funds under Section 8005,” said the judge, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam.



Trump urges Republicans to ‘nationalize’ voting
Massive Minnesota fraud case puts AG Keith Ellison under microscope as climate ties resurface
Norwegian royals implode with Epstein emails, son re-arrested ahead of his rape trial
Teachers unions lead Portland uprisings against ICE with children present
Multi-level marketing ventures found to fund Republicans and win concessions
DOJ opening civil rights probe after Catholic school in California broken into, vandalized
Groundhog Day and Friday the 13th
Savannah Guthrie asks for prayer as her mother remains missing: ‘We need you’
Planned Parenthood drops lawsuit challenging Trump administration’s Medicaid cuts
San Francisco uncovers nine secret drug and gambling dens disguised as convenience stores
Dozens of House Republicans Demand Mitch McConnell ‘Stop Stalling the SAVE Act’
Jeffries says GOP ‘done eff’d up in Texas,’ vows they won’t win five seats: ‘They can’t ignore it’
Chuck Schumer Lambasted After Comparing the SAVE Act to Jim Crow
Trump administration blocked from ending Temporary Protected Status for Haitians
BREAKING: Under Threat of Criminal Contempt, Bill and Hillary Clinton Have Agreed to Testify in House’s Jeffrey Epstein Probe
See also  Letitia James fires attorney consumer fraud over criticism of pediatric ‘gender care’

The administration’s “argument that the need for the requested border barrier construction funding was ‘unforeseen’ cannot logically be squared with the Administration’s multiple requests for funding for exactly that purpose dating back to at least early 2018,” he added.

The lawsuit also suggested that another $1.5 billion may be blocked because, in part, “the Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests in the areas known as El Paso Sector Project 1 and Yuma Sector Project 1.”

Gilliam was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014.


Trump urges Republicans to ‘nationalize’ voting
Massive Minnesota fraud case puts AG Keith Ellison under microscope as climate ties resurface
Norwegian royals implode with Epstein emails, son re-arrested ahead of his rape trial
Teachers unions lead Portland uprisings against ICE with children present
Multi-level marketing ventures found to fund Republicans and win concessions
DOJ opening civil rights probe after Catholic school in California broken into, vandalized
Groundhog Day and Friday the 13th
Savannah Guthrie asks for prayer as her mother remains missing: ‘We need you’
Planned Parenthood drops lawsuit challenging Trump administration’s Medicaid cuts
San Francisco uncovers nine secret drug and gambling dens disguised as convenience stores
Dozens of House Republicans Demand Mitch McConnell ‘Stop Stalling the SAVE Act’
Jeffries says GOP ‘done eff’d up in Texas,’ vows they won’t win five seats: ‘They can’t ignore it’
Chuck Schumer Lambasted After Comparing the SAVE Act to Jim Crow
Trump administration blocked from ending Temporary Protected Status for Haitians
BREAKING: Under Threat of Criminal Contempt, Bill and Hillary Clinton Have Agreed to Testify in House’s Jeffrey Epstein Probe
See also  Judge dismisses DOJ judicial misconduct complaint against James Boasberg

The case is Sierra Club, v. Trump, No. 19-cv-00892-HSG in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The decision can be read here.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter