A federal judge in Oakland, California, is blocking a $1 billion portion of President Donald Trump’s $8 billion emergency budget for building the border wall.
The blocked project used $1 billion allocated by Congress for anti-drug accounts. The preliminary injunction will apply while the judge fully considers the lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which includes leaders from pro-migration and environmental groups, as well as from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
“Plaintiffs also have shown a likelihood of success as to their argument that Defendants fail to meet the ‘unforeseen military requirement’ condition for the reprogramming of funds under Section 8005,” said the judge, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam.
Trump working to clean ‘filthy’ Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, blames Biden for maintenance delays
Trump calls for second ‘big, beautiful bill’ to fund ICE on his desk by June 1
Watch: Nancy Pelosi Plants Absurd Conspiracy Theory About the 2026 Election
Grand conspiracy investigation into Obama-era officials gains steam in South Florida
Impeach Them All: Rogue Judge Orders Trump to Restore Legal Status to Up to 900,000 Immigrants
Iran launches mass text-based recruitment drive, including minors, to join targeted security forces
Disneyland honors 100-year-old WWII veteran who witnessed iconic Iwo Jima flag raising
Swing-district Democrat faces backlash after vulgar late-night post targeting Trump, doubles down
Trump, Bondi watch historic SCOTUS arguments as justices duel over birthright citizenship
Breaking: Iran Has Requested a Ceasefire, Trump Says
Colorado climber plunges 30 feet after gear ‘failed’ scaling mountainside, rescuers say
Trump Weighing NATO Exit, Slams Alliance as ‘Paper Tiger’ Over Iran Response
Lawmaker says Iran targeted him in phishing attack disguised as TV interview
Florida hospital patient finally leaves room after 5 months amid legal battle
The Votes Are In: JD Vance Absolutely Dominates 2028 GOP Field – 2nd Only to Trump in All Time Support at CPAC
The administration’s “argument that the need for the requested border barrier construction funding was ‘unforeseen’ cannot logically be squared with the Administration’s multiple requests for funding for exactly that purpose dating back to at least early 2018,” he added.
The lawsuit also suggested that another $1.5 billion may be blocked because, in part, “the Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests in the areas known as El Paso Sector Project 1 and Yuma Sector Project 1.”
Gilliam was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014.
Trump working to clean ‘filthy’ Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, blames Biden for maintenance delays
Trump calls for second ‘big, beautiful bill’ to fund ICE on his desk by June 1
Watch: Nancy Pelosi Plants Absurd Conspiracy Theory About the 2026 Election
Grand conspiracy investigation into Obama-era officials gains steam in South Florida
Impeach Them All: Rogue Judge Orders Trump to Restore Legal Status to Up to 900,000 Immigrants
Iran launches mass text-based recruitment drive, including minors, to join targeted security forces
Disneyland honors 100-year-old WWII veteran who witnessed iconic Iwo Jima flag raising
Swing-district Democrat faces backlash after vulgar late-night post targeting Trump, doubles down
Trump, Bondi watch historic SCOTUS arguments as justices duel over birthright citizenship
Breaking: Iran Has Requested a Ceasefire, Trump Says
Colorado climber plunges 30 feet after gear ‘failed’ scaling mountainside, rescuers say
Trump Weighing NATO Exit, Slams Alliance as ‘Paper Tiger’ Over Iran Response
Lawmaker says Iran targeted him in phishing attack disguised as TV interview
Florida hospital patient finally leaves room after 5 months amid legal battle
The Votes Are In: JD Vance Absolutely Dominates 2028 GOP Field – 2nd Only to Trump in All Time Support at CPAC
The case is Sierra Club, v. Trump, No. 19-cv-00892-HSG in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The decision can be read here.
Story cited here.









