A federal judge in Oakland, California, is blocking a $1 billion portion of President Donald Trump’s $8 billion emergency budget for building the border wall.
The blocked project used $1 billion allocated by Congress for anti-drug accounts. The preliminary injunction will apply while the judge fully considers the lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which includes leaders from pro-migration and environmental groups, as well as from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
“Plaintiffs also have shown a likelihood of success as to their argument that Defendants fail to meet the ‘unforeseen military requirement’ condition for the reprogramming of funds under Section 8005,” said the judge, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam.
Federal appeals court blocks mailing of abortion pills in ruling with nationwide effect
57 pounds of marijuana worth $220,000 found in Maryland man and woman’s suitcase at Dulles Airport
Oregon Man Faces Lengthy Prison Sentence After Targeting Customs and Border Protection Helicopter
Trump aims to reset war powers clock with controversial bid to bypass Congress
DOJ Targets Blue State for Giving Illegals Financial Assistance While Neglecting U.S. Citizens
Black conservative unleashes on Obama for ‘constantly whining’ after SCOTUS voting rights decision
Pope Leo places former illegal immigrant in charge of red state diocese
Teen suspect in murder of two bank employees in Kentucky leads police on wild 130 mph chase
Sheriff Grady Judd names Jan. 6 participant, MAGA influencer among 266 arrested in prostitution sting
Progressive Dems Unveil ‘New Affordability Agenda,’ and It’s Just As Bad as You Might Think
Trump Declares Hostilities with Iran ‘Terminated’
Trump tells Congress on 60th day of Iran conflict: ‘Hostilities’ have ‘terminated’
Trump says UFC ‘Claw’ cage construction to begin next week at White House
Alito rips race-based claim in high-stakes migrant protections case at Supreme Court
DHS scorches Pritzker’s ‘sanctuary’ state after child rapist on ICE detainer released
The administration’s “argument that the need for the requested border barrier construction funding was ‘unforeseen’ cannot logically be squared with the Administration’s multiple requests for funding for exactly that purpose dating back to at least early 2018,” he added.
The lawsuit also suggested that another $1.5 billion may be blocked because, in part, “the Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests in the areas known as El Paso Sector Project 1 and Yuma Sector Project 1.”
Gilliam was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014.
Federal appeals court blocks mailing of abortion pills in ruling with nationwide effect
57 pounds of marijuana worth $220,000 found in Maryland man and woman’s suitcase at Dulles Airport
Oregon Man Faces Lengthy Prison Sentence After Targeting Customs and Border Protection Helicopter
Trump aims to reset war powers clock with controversial bid to bypass Congress
DOJ Targets Blue State for Giving Illegals Financial Assistance While Neglecting U.S. Citizens
Black conservative unleashes on Obama for ‘constantly whining’ after SCOTUS voting rights decision
Pope Leo places former illegal immigrant in charge of red state diocese
Teen suspect in murder of two bank employees in Kentucky leads police on wild 130 mph chase
Sheriff Grady Judd names Jan. 6 participant, MAGA influencer among 266 arrested in prostitution sting
Progressive Dems Unveil ‘New Affordability Agenda,’ and It’s Just As Bad as You Might Think
Trump Declares Hostilities with Iran ‘Terminated’
Trump tells Congress on 60th day of Iran conflict: ‘Hostilities’ have ‘terminated’
Trump says UFC ‘Claw’ cage construction to begin next week at White House
Alito rips race-based claim in high-stakes migrant protections case at Supreme Court
DHS scorches Pritzker’s ‘sanctuary’ state after child rapist on ICE detainer released
The case is Sierra Club, v. Trump, No. 19-cv-00892-HSG in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The decision can be read here.
Story cited here.









