A federal judge in Oakland, California, is blocking a $1 billion portion of President Donald Trump’s $8 billion emergency budget for building the border wall.
The blocked project used $1 billion allocated by Congress for anti-drug accounts. The preliminary injunction will apply while the judge fully considers the lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which includes leaders from pro-migration and environmental groups, as well as from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
“Plaintiffs also have shown a likelihood of success as to their argument that Defendants fail to meet the ‘unforeseen military requirement’ condition for the reprogramming of funds under Section 8005,” said the judge, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam.
OpenAI Employees Dropped More Than $296K on Democrats While Republicans Got Nothing, Filings Show
Trump DHS chief under fire from conservatives after immigration speech ignites backlash
Bryan Kohberger’s former defense expert calls for death penalty, says investigators missed key evidence
Would-Be Burglar Picked The Wrong North Carolina House To Break Into
GOP Rep Max Miller pushes back against abuse allegations: ‘I have nothing to hide’
Southern university requires business suits, bans du-rags and other headwear in new dress code
Trump demand puts vulnerable Republicans in impossible spot ahead of midterms
Anti-Violence Activist Allegedly Stabs Woman With Box Cutter
Obama Granted Bill Gates Top Secret Clearance At Energy Department
Fauci’s diary details how his relationship with Trump soured
It’s OK to be nostalgic about Woody Allen’s ‘Midnight in Paris’
Brewing conflict within the anti-Houthi coalition risks blowing up the US strategy in Yemen
The race to replace Gretchen Whitmer in Michigan
Inside the behemoth Smithsonian museum network drawing fire from the Trump administration
Vulnerable Democrat warns party to ‘fight back’ against growing socialist movement
The administration’s “argument that the need for the requested border barrier construction funding was ‘unforeseen’ cannot logically be squared with the Administration’s multiple requests for funding for exactly that purpose dating back to at least early 2018,” he added.
The lawsuit also suggested that another $1.5 billion may be blocked because, in part, “the Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests in the areas known as El Paso Sector Project 1 and Yuma Sector Project 1.”
Gilliam was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014.
OpenAI Employees Dropped More Than $296K on Democrats While Republicans Got Nothing, Filings Show
Trump DHS chief under fire from conservatives after immigration speech ignites backlash
Bryan Kohberger’s former defense expert calls for death penalty, says investigators missed key evidence
Would-Be Burglar Picked The Wrong North Carolina House To Break Into
GOP Rep Max Miller pushes back against abuse allegations: ‘I have nothing to hide’
Southern university requires business suits, bans du-rags and other headwear in new dress code
Trump demand puts vulnerable Republicans in impossible spot ahead of midterms
Anti-Violence Activist Allegedly Stabs Woman With Box Cutter
Obama Granted Bill Gates Top Secret Clearance At Energy Department
Fauci’s diary details how his relationship with Trump soured
It’s OK to be nostalgic about Woody Allen’s ‘Midnight in Paris’
Brewing conflict within the anti-Houthi coalition risks blowing up the US strategy in Yemen
The race to replace Gretchen Whitmer in Michigan
Inside the behemoth Smithsonian museum network drawing fire from the Trump administration
Vulnerable Democrat warns party to ‘fight back’ against growing socialist movement
The case is Sierra Club, v. Trump, No. 19-cv-00892-HSG in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The decision can be read here.
Story cited here.
