A federal judge in Oakland, California, is blocking a $1 billion portion of President Donald Trump’s $8 billion emergency budget for building the border wall.
The blocked project used $1 billion allocated by Congress for anti-drug accounts. The preliminary injunction will apply while the judge fully considers the lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which includes leaders from pro-migration and environmental groups, as well as from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
“Plaintiffs also have shown a likelihood of success as to their argument that Defendants fail to meet the ‘unforeseen military requirement’ condition for the reprogramming of funds under Section 8005,” said the judge, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam.
‘We’re taxing the rich’: NYC Mayor Mamdani touts new $500M-a-year tax on luxury second homes
Watch: Comedian Dave Chappelle Refuses to Let NPR Reporter Shame Him for Trans Jokes
Sotomayor walks back remarks criticizing Kavanaugh, says comments were ‘inappropriate’
Leftist Darlng Hasan Piker Given Chance to Walk Back Hamas Sympathy – Instead, He Says He’d ‘Vote’ for Them
Democratic secretary of state was ‘prepared’ for FBI raid in Arizona, emails show
ODNI sends criminal referrals to DOJ for ex-IG, whistleblower tied to Trump impeachment
Catholic JFK Laid Out How Presidents Should Deal With Papal Criticism in Famous 1960 Speech
School Agrees to Pay Up After Counselor Was Fired for Objecting to Transgender Policy
Woman added to FBI’s Ten Most Wanted list arrested hours later after tips poured in from Florida: Patel
Congress mulls compelling testimony from ActBlue leadership
Hunter Biden now living abroad as legal troubles mount, court filing reveals
DC curfew ends as teen takeover fears clock in – city braces for chaos amid spring break mayhem
Bessent ‘optimistic’ gas prices will fall to $3 a gallon by midsummer
Watch: As Walls Close in, Schiff’s Own Words Come Back to Haunt Him in Resurfaced Pardon Video He Wishes Didn’t Exist
What to know about the Freedom 250 UFC fight on the White House lawn
The administration’s “argument that the need for the requested border barrier construction funding was ‘unforeseen’ cannot logically be squared with the Administration’s multiple requests for funding for exactly that purpose dating back to at least early 2018,” he added.
The lawsuit also suggested that another $1.5 billion may be blocked because, in part, “the Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests in the areas known as El Paso Sector Project 1 and Yuma Sector Project 1.”
Gilliam was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014.
‘We’re taxing the rich’: NYC Mayor Mamdani touts new $500M-a-year tax on luxury second homes
Watch: Comedian Dave Chappelle Refuses to Let NPR Reporter Shame Him for Trans Jokes
Sotomayor walks back remarks criticizing Kavanaugh, says comments were ‘inappropriate’
Leftist Darlng Hasan Piker Given Chance to Walk Back Hamas Sympathy – Instead, He Says He’d ‘Vote’ for Them
Democratic secretary of state was ‘prepared’ for FBI raid in Arizona, emails show
ODNI sends criminal referrals to DOJ for ex-IG, whistleblower tied to Trump impeachment
Catholic JFK Laid Out How Presidents Should Deal With Papal Criticism in Famous 1960 Speech
School Agrees to Pay Up After Counselor Was Fired for Objecting to Transgender Policy
Woman added to FBI’s Ten Most Wanted list arrested hours later after tips poured in from Florida: Patel
Congress mulls compelling testimony from ActBlue leadership
Hunter Biden now living abroad as legal troubles mount, court filing reveals
DC curfew ends as teen takeover fears clock in – city braces for chaos amid spring break mayhem
Bessent ‘optimistic’ gas prices will fall to $3 a gallon by midsummer
Watch: As Walls Close in, Schiff’s Own Words Come Back to Haunt Him in Resurfaced Pardon Video He Wishes Didn’t Exist
What to know about the Freedom 250 UFC fight on the White House lawn
The case is Sierra Club, v. Trump, No. 19-cv-00892-HSG in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The decision can be read here.
Story cited here.









