A federal judge in Oakland, California, is blocking a $1 billion portion of President Donald Trump’s $8 billion emergency budget for building the border wall.
The blocked project used $1 billion allocated by Congress for anti-drug accounts. The preliminary injunction will apply while the judge fully considers the lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which includes leaders from pro-migration and environmental groups, as well as from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
“Plaintiffs also have shown a likelihood of success as to their argument that Defendants fail to meet the ‘unforeseen military requirement’ condition for the reprogramming of funds under Section 8005,” said the judge, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam.
Georgia GOP Rep Barry Loudermilk to retire, adding to wave of House exits
More than 200 people evaluated in Tennessee after carbon monoxide leak infiltrates university facility
FBI arrests 55 in massive drug ring with alleged China supplier flooding US streets with fentanyl
Hochul primary challenger picks democratic socialist, once arrested for harassment, as running mate
DC Democrats Turn Their Backs on the Clintons: ‘They Bring Nothing But Baggage’
Government lawyer who told judge ‘this job sucks’ sent back to DHS
Democrats say Clintons’ agreement to testify undercuts subpoena push, won’t bring new Epstein answers
Baltimore’s progressive mayor calls reporter ‘racist’ in heated exchange over luxury taxpayer vehicle
CBS News Pulls ’60 Minutes’ Episode After Contributor Appears in Epstein Files
Trump Calls for His Administration to Use a ‘Bit of a Softer Touch’ on Immigration Enforcement
Cities Church Attendee Reveals How the Hatred Has Continued After Leftist Church Invasion
Bill Gates Speaks Out on His Inclusion in Newly Released Epstein Documents
Noem vows criminal prosecution after catching alleged DHS ‘prolific leaker’
‘Melania’ Documentary Director Says ‘Divine Intervention’ Brought Him to the Surprise Hit Project
Anti-ICE activists plan to install 1,000 street blockades across Minneapolis
The administration’s “argument that the need for the requested border barrier construction funding was ‘unforeseen’ cannot logically be squared with the Administration’s multiple requests for funding for exactly that purpose dating back to at least early 2018,” he added.
The lawsuit also suggested that another $1.5 billion may be blocked because, in part, “the Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests in the areas known as El Paso Sector Project 1 and Yuma Sector Project 1.”
Gilliam was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014.
Georgia GOP Rep Barry Loudermilk to retire, adding to wave of House exits
More than 200 people evaluated in Tennessee after carbon monoxide leak infiltrates university facility
FBI arrests 55 in massive drug ring with alleged China supplier flooding US streets with fentanyl
Hochul primary challenger picks democratic socialist, once arrested for harassment, as running mate
DC Democrats Turn Their Backs on the Clintons: ‘They Bring Nothing But Baggage’
Government lawyer who told judge ‘this job sucks’ sent back to DHS
Democrats say Clintons’ agreement to testify undercuts subpoena push, won’t bring new Epstein answers
Baltimore’s progressive mayor calls reporter ‘racist’ in heated exchange over luxury taxpayer vehicle
CBS News Pulls ’60 Minutes’ Episode After Contributor Appears in Epstein Files
Trump Calls for His Administration to Use a ‘Bit of a Softer Touch’ on Immigration Enforcement
Cities Church Attendee Reveals How the Hatred Has Continued After Leftist Church Invasion
Bill Gates Speaks Out on His Inclusion in Newly Released Epstein Documents
Noem vows criminal prosecution after catching alleged DHS ‘prolific leaker’
‘Melania’ Documentary Director Says ‘Divine Intervention’ Brought Him to the Surprise Hit Project
Anti-ICE activists plan to install 1,000 street blockades across Minneapolis
The case is Sierra Club, v. Trump, No. 19-cv-00892-HSG in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The decision can be read here.
Story cited here.









