A federal judge in Oakland, California, is blocking a $1 billion portion of President Donald Trump’s $8 billion emergency budget for building the border wall.
The blocked project used $1 billion allocated by Congress for anti-drug accounts. The preliminary injunction will apply while the judge fully considers the lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which includes leaders from pro-migration and environmental groups, as well as from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
“Plaintiffs also have shown a likelihood of success as to their argument that Defendants fail to meet the ‘unforeseen military requirement’ condition for the reprogramming of funds under Section 8005,” said the judge, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam.
Enemy within: Counterterrorism experts fear sleeper cells could be poised inside US
Kamala Harris Intervenes at Last Second in TX Dem Senate Race, Endorses Jasmine Crockett
GOP warns Democrats’ DHS shutdown could jeopardize World Cup security
Nancy Guthrie abduction sparks fears over senior safety in affluent communities: expert
Austin Police Kill Armed Gunman After 3 Die, 14 Wounded Bar Shooting
‘I Love Trump’: Viral Videos Show Iranians Praising Trump, Dancing in the Street Following US Strikes
Dems’ potential 2028 hopefuls come out against US strikes on Iran
‘Bloodthirsty Thugs’: Trump Celebrates Killing of Iranian Regime Leader in Lengthy Post
Hegseth Announces the Woke Organization Formerly Known as the Boy Scouts Will Drop DEI – But the Damage Is Already Done
Newsom book tour missteps expose national campaign ‘growing pains’
Republican NeverTrumpers Tried Throwing a Conference and the Results Were Less Than Stellar
Sustained war with Iran could drain US missile stockpiles, test escalation control
From hostage crisis to assassination plots: Iran’s near half-century war on Americans
Frozen Yogurt Store Near Spokane Gets Death Threats Over Touching Tribute to Charlie Kirk
Mamdani’s response to Trump’s Iran strike sparks conservative backlash: ‘Rooting for the ayatollah’
The administration’s “argument that the need for the requested border barrier construction funding was ‘unforeseen’ cannot logically be squared with the Administration’s multiple requests for funding for exactly that purpose dating back to at least early 2018,” he added.
The lawsuit also suggested that another $1.5 billion may be blocked because, in part, “the Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests in the areas known as El Paso Sector Project 1 and Yuma Sector Project 1.”
Gilliam was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014.
Enemy within: Counterterrorism experts fear sleeper cells could be poised inside US
Kamala Harris Intervenes at Last Second in TX Dem Senate Race, Endorses Jasmine Crockett
GOP warns Democrats’ DHS shutdown could jeopardize World Cup security
Nancy Guthrie abduction sparks fears over senior safety in affluent communities: expert
Austin Police Kill Armed Gunman After 3 Die, 14 Wounded Bar Shooting
‘I Love Trump’: Viral Videos Show Iranians Praising Trump, Dancing in the Street Following US Strikes
Dems’ potential 2028 hopefuls come out against US strikes on Iran
‘Bloodthirsty Thugs’: Trump Celebrates Killing of Iranian Regime Leader in Lengthy Post
Hegseth Announces the Woke Organization Formerly Known as the Boy Scouts Will Drop DEI – But the Damage Is Already Done
Newsom book tour missteps expose national campaign ‘growing pains’
Republican NeverTrumpers Tried Throwing a Conference and the Results Were Less Than Stellar
Sustained war with Iran could drain US missile stockpiles, test escalation control
From hostage crisis to assassination plots: Iran’s near half-century war on Americans
Frozen Yogurt Store Near Spokane Gets Death Threats Over Touching Tribute to Charlie Kirk
Mamdani’s response to Trump’s Iran strike sparks conservative backlash: ‘Rooting for the ayatollah’
The case is Sierra Club, v. Trump, No. 19-cv-00892-HSG in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The decision can be read here.
Story cited here.
