A federal judge in Oakland, California, is blocking a $1 billion portion of President Donald Trump’s $8 billion emergency budget for building the border wall.
The blocked project used $1 billion allocated by Congress for anti-drug accounts. The preliminary injunction will apply while the judge fully considers the lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which includes leaders from pro-migration and environmental groups, as well as from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
“Plaintiffs also have shown a likelihood of success as to their argument that Defendants fail to meet the ‘unforeseen military requirement’ condition for the reprogramming of funds under Section 8005,” said the judge, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam.
Watch: Scott Bessent Announces Details of ‘Unprecedented Campaign’ Against ‘Iran and Its Enablers’
‘Moderate’ Dem gubernatorial candidate embraced DEI budget tool, Green New Deal-style policies
Trump scores Supreme Court win on mail-in voting restrictions before midterms
San Francisco 49ers Owner Arrested at Trailer Park in East Palestine, Ohio
Oklahoma-based Southwest Airlines flight attendant found dead in Hawaii, police investigating
UK gives missile blueprints to Ukraine as relations with Russia collapse
Manhunt for Massachusetts woman ends with grim discovery week after police officer husband found dead at home
Tree-Trimmer Arrested After On-the-Job ‘Prank’ Leaves Co-Worker Dead
Washington Post Ordered to Re-Hire Columnist Who Made ‘Beyond the Pale’ Comments on Day of Charlie Kirk’s Assassination
Trump takes children on tour of helipad and ballroom construction sites
Trump touts endorsement power ahead of vital primary competitions
Clarence Thomas scorches racial litmus tests policing thought: ‘Stay Black and die’
El-Sayed distances himself from Hasan Piker after disturbing remarks about Jewish Americans
Iranian State Media Airs Bizarre Video Threatening Barron Trump’s Life, Offers $10 Million Bounty
Caitlin Clark Has Career Game as Transgender Controversy Erupts On-Court
The administration’s “argument that the need for the requested border barrier construction funding was ‘unforeseen’ cannot logically be squared with the Administration’s multiple requests for funding for exactly that purpose dating back to at least early 2018,” he added.
The lawsuit also suggested that another $1.5 billion may be blocked because, in part, “the Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests in the areas known as El Paso Sector Project 1 and Yuma Sector Project 1.”
Gilliam was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014.
Watch: Scott Bessent Announces Details of ‘Unprecedented Campaign’ Against ‘Iran and Its Enablers’
‘Moderate’ Dem gubernatorial candidate embraced DEI budget tool, Green New Deal-style policies
Trump scores Supreme Court win on mail-in voting restrictions before midterms
San Francisco 49ers Owner Arrested at Trailer Park in East Palestine, Ohio
Oklahoma-based Southwest Airlines flight attendant found dead in Hawaii, police investigating
UK gives missile blueprints to Ukraine as relations with Russia collapse
Manhunt for Massachusetts woman ends with grim discovery week after police officer husband found dead at home
Tree-Trimmer Arrested After On-the-Job ‘Prank’ Leaves Co-Worker Dead
Washington Post Ordered to Re-Hire Columnist Who Made ‘Beyond the Pale’ Comments on Day of Charlie Kirk’s Assassination
Trump takes children on tour of helipad and ballroom construction sites
Trump touts endorsement power ahead of vital primary competitions
Clarence Thomas scorches racial litmus tests policing thought: ‘Stay Black and die’
El-Sayed distances himself from Hasan Piker after disturbing remarks about Jewish Americans
Iranian State Media Airs Bizarre Video Threatening Barron Trump’s Life, Offers $10 Million Bounty
Caitlin Clark Has Career Game as Transgender Controversy Erupts On-Court
The case is Sierra Club, v. Trump, No. 19-cv-00892-HSG in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The decision can be read here.
Story cited here.
