A federal judge in Oakland, California, is blocking a $1 billion portion of President Donald Trump’s $8 billion emergency budget for building the border wall.
The blocked project used $1 billion allocated by Congress for anti-drug accounts. The preliminary injunction will apply while the judge fully considers the lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which includes leaders from pro-migration and environmental groups, as well as from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
“Plaintiffs also have shown a likelihood of success as to their argument that Defendants fail to meet the ‘unforeseen military requirement’ condition for the reprogramming of funds under Section 8005,” said the judge, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam.
Stacey Abrams hit with subpoena in alleged campaign finance violations saga: ‘No one is above the law’
Members of Congress using online prediction markets? Don’t bet on it
Breaking: UAE Has Been Secretly Striking Iran, Fighting Alongside US and Israel
John Cornyn under fire from MAGA base over anti-Trump post
San Antonio Spurs Superstar Ejected After Vicious Hit – Should the NBA Suspend Him?
Trump ‘seriously considering’ plan to make Venezuela and its $40 trillion in oil permanent part of USA
Watch: Military Veteran Scores the Biggest Payday in ‘Price Is Right’ History
Mega-mansion built on Manson murder site now a luxury rental after years of failing to find buyer
Unions’ ‘Astonishing’ Attack Ad Against LA Republican Spencer Pratt Actually Helps His Case
Maine progressive says he won’t back Schumer even after Democrats unite behind Collins challenger
Trump Scorches 2 SCOTUS Justices by Name: ‘Democrats don’t really need to “PACK THE COURT”‘
More than 25 charged in nationwide Tren de Aragua crackdown involving guns, drugs and cash
Watch: Trump Blasts NFL Over Possible Amazon, Netflix Deal – Says Many Fans ‘Don’t Make Enough Money to Pay’
ActBlue scrutiny fuels new GOP bills to tighten election donation rules
Alabama AG makes Supreme Court play that could deal decisive blow in redistricting war
The administration’s “argument that the need for the requested border barrier construction funding was ‘unforeseen’ cannot logically be squared with the Administration’s multiple requests for funding for exactly that purpose dating back to at least early 2018,” he added.
The lawsuit also suggested that another $1.5 billion may be blocked because, in part, “the Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests in the areas known as El Paso Sector Project 1 and Yuma Sector Project 1.”
Gilliam was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014.
Stacey Abrams hit with subpoena in alleged campaign finance violations saga: ‘No one is above the law’
Members of Congress using online prediction markets? Don’t bet on it
Breaking: UAE Has Been Secretly Striking Iran, Fighting Alongside US and Israel
John Cornyn under fire from MAGA base over anti-Trump post
San Antonio Spurs Superstar Ejected After Vicious Hit – Should the NBA Suspend Him?
Trump ‘seriously considering’ plan to make Venezuela and its $40 trillion in oil permanent part of USA
Watch: Military Veteran Scores the Biggest Payday in ‘Price Is Right’ History
Mega-mansion built on Manson murder site now a luxury rental after years of failing to find buyer
Unions’ ‘Astonishing’ Attack Ad Against LA Republican Spencer Pratt Actually Helps His Case
Maine progressive says he won’t back Schumer even after Democrats unite behind Collins challenger
Trump Scorches 2 SCOTUS Justices by Name: ‘Democrats don’t really need to “PACK THE COURT”‘
More than 25 charged in nationwide Tren de Aragua crackdown involving guns, drugs and cash
Watch: Trump Blasts NFL Over Possible Amazon, Netflix Deal – Says Many Fans ‘Don’t Make Enough Money to Pay’
ActBlue scrutiny fuels new GOP bills to tighten election donation rules
Alabama AG makes Supreme Court play that could deal decisive blow in redistricting war
The case is Sierra Club, v. Trump, No. 19-cv-00892-HSG in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The decision can be read here.
Story cited here.









