News Opinons Politics

Judge Blocks Emergency $1 Billion for Border Wall

A federal judge in Oakland, California, is blocking a $1 billion portion of President Donald Trump’s $8 billion emergency budget for building the border wall.

The blocked project used $1 billion allocated by Congress for anti-drug accounts. The preliminary injunction will apply while the judge fully considers the lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which includes leaders from pro-migration and environmental groups, as well as from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

“Plaintiffs also have shown a likelihood of success as to their argument that Defendants fail to meet the ‘unforeseen military requirement’ condition for the reprogramming of funds under Section 8005,” said the judge, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam.



Hero Principal Gives Credit Where It’s Due: ‘I Think God’s Hand Was on All of Us’
Airlines Seek Federal Bailouts Following Spirit Airlines Shutdown as Fuel Prices Rise
Key China-Iran infrastructure exposes critical hole in Trump’s war strategy
Xi gifts Trump Chinese rose seeds, on top of new ammo for White House ballroom
Are Marco Rubio’s 2028 presidential prospects on the rise?
Adverse court rulings slow, and may stop, House Democrats’ march to the majority
Trump wraps widely-watched trip to China, departing on Air Force One after high-stakes Xi meeting
Ugandan Evangelist Killed by Suspected Muslims After Sharing the Gospel
Israel, Jews targeted worldwide as well-funded leftist, Islamist groups join for ‘Nakba 78’ protests
This Midwestern state leads the nation in home foreclosures as US filings jump by 26%
Marine Vet Stops Gunman’s 60-Round Shooting Spree: Thankfully He Had a Concealed Carry Permit
Momentum builds to pass bill after Jack Smith’s secret Arctic Frost subpoenas
Bronx man convicted of running secret Chinese police station in Manhattan used to monitor dissidents
Trump touts ‘fantastic trade deals’ in final Xi meeting amid tariff standoff
Trump reveals Xi’s stance on arming Iran as Hormuz tensions rattle markets
See also  Russia ends ceasefire, launching ‘200 attack drones’ at Ukraine

The administration’s “argument that the need for the requested border barrier construction funding was ‘unforeseen’ cannot logically be squared with the Administration’s multiple requests for funding for exactly that purpose dating back to at least early 2018,” he added.

The lawsuit also suggested that another $1.5 billion may be blocked because, in part, “the Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests in the areas known as El Paso Sector Project 1 and Yuma Sector Project 1.”

Gilliam was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014.


Hero Principal Gives Credit Where It’s Due: ‘I Think God’s Hand Was on All of Us’
Airlines Seek Federal Bailouts Following Spirit Airlines Shutdown as Fuel Prices Rise
Key China-Iran infrastructure exposes critical hole in Trump’s war strategy
Xi gifts Trump Chinese rose seeds, on top of new ammo for White House ballroom
Are Marco Rubio’s 2028 presidential prospects on the rise?
Adverse court rulings slow, and may stop, House Democrats’ march to the majority
Trump wraps widely-watched trip to China, departing on Air Force One after high-stakes Xi meeting
Ugandan Evangelist Killed by Suspected Muslims After Sharing the Gospel
Israel, Jews targeted worldwide as well-funded leftist, Islamist groups join for ‘Nakba 78’ protests
This Midwestern state leads the nation in home foreclosures as US filings jump by 26%
Marine Vet Stops Gunman’s 60-Round Shooting Spree: Thankfully He Had a Concealed Carry Permit
Momentum builds to pass bill after Jack Smith’s secret Arctic Frost subpoenas
Bronx man convicted of running secret Chinese police station in Manhattan used to monitor dissidents
Trump touts ‘fantastic trade deals’ in final Xi meeting amid tariff standoff
Trump reveals Xi’s stance on arming Iran as Hormuz tensions rattle markets
See also  Trump and Cabinet officials welcomed by Xi at China’s Great Hall of the People

The case is Sierra Club, v. Trump, No. 19-cv-00892-HSG in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The decision can be read here.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter