A federal judge in Oakland, California, is blocking a $1 billion portion of President Donald Trump’s $8 billion emergency budget for building the border wall.
The blocked project used $1 billion allocated by Congress for anti-drug accounts. The preliminary injunction will apply while the judge fully considers the lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which includes leaders from pro-migration and environmental groups, as well as from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
“Plaintiffs also have shown a likelihood of success as to their argument that Defendants fail to meet the ‘unforeseen military requirement’ condition for the reprogramming of funds under Section 8005,” said the judge, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam.
GOP governors, AGs back Trump SAVE Act push, warn system gives ‘undue influence’ to states with illegal aliens
Strikes may set Iran back — but likely won’t end nuclear program, UN watchdog chief warns
Mexican man attempts to cross illegally into US via underside of bridge
Ex-principal sidelined over Charlie Kirk controversy now headed to prison in illicit image case
Team USA’s Heartbreaking Loss in World Baseball Classic Final Leads to Jesus Being Praised on National TV
Democrats Scrambling as Leftist Icon Is Hit with Bombshell Child Rape Allegations
Gabbard and Patel deny knowledge of Trump emergency election order plans
NYC spends more per homeless person than a typical household earns in a year, data shows
Dem-backed ‘social justice’ law put Virginia’s ODU campus at risk before attack, former AG argues
China hopes Trump’s gamble on Iran and Cuba loses the US more than it gains
Breaking: Trump Suspends 100-Year-Old Law in Bid to Lower Oil Prices
Pure Evil: Trans ‘Youth Advocate’ Arrested Over Rape of Infant He Was Asked to Look After – and It Gets Even Worse
Masked suspect seen at Nancy Guthrie’s home three weeks before her abduction, sources say
Top DOJ officials to brief House Oversight Committee for Jeffrey Epstein probe
Federal judge refuses to recuse himself from Minnesota DHS, ICE case
The administration’s “argument that the need for the requested border barrier construction funding was ‘unforeseen’ cannot logically be squared with the Administration’s multiple requests for funding for exactly that purpose dating back to at least early 2018,” he added.
The lawsuit also suggested that another $1.5 billion may be blocked because, in part, “the Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests in the areas known as El Paso Sector Project 1 and Yuma Sector Project 1.”
Gilliam was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014.
GOP governors, AGs back Trump SAVE Act push, warn system gives ‘undue influence’ to states with illegal aliens
Strikes may set Iran back — but likely won’t end nuclear program, UN watchdog chief warns
Mexican man attempts to cross illegally into US via underside of bridge
Ex-principal sidelined over Charlie Kirk controversy now headed to prison in illicit image case
Team USA’s Heartbreaking Loss in World Baseball Classic Final Leads to Jesus Being Praised on National TV
Democrats Scrambling as Leftist Icon Is Hit with Bombshell Child Rape Allegations
Gabbard and Patel deny knowledge of Trump emergency election order plans
NYC spends more per homeless person than a typical household earns in a year, data shows
Dem-backed ‘social justice’ law put Virginia’s ODU campus at risk before attack, former AG argues
China hopes Trump’s gamble on Iran and Cuba loses the US more than it gains
Breaking: Trump Suspends 100-Year-Old Law in Bid to Lower Oil Prices
Pure Evil: Trans ‘Youth Advocate’ Arrested Over Rape of Infant He Was Asked to Look After – and It Gets Even Worse
Masked suspect seen at Nancy Guthrie’s home three weeks before her abduction, sources say
Top DOJ officials to brief House Oversight Committee for Jeffrey Epstein probe
Federal judge refuses to recuse himself from Minnesota DHS, ICE case
The case is Sierra Club, v. Trump, No. 19-cv-00892-HSG in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The decision can be read here.
Story cited here.








