A federal judge in Oakland, California, is blocking a $1 billion portion of President Donald Trump’s $8 billion emergency budget for building the border wall.
The blocked project used $1 billion allocated by Congress for anti-drug accounts. The preliminary injunction will apply while the judge fully considers the lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which includes leaders from pro-migration and environmental groups, as well as from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
“Plaintiffs also have shown a likelihood of success as to their argument that Defendants fail to meet the ‘unforeseen military requirement’ condition for the reprogramming of funds under Section 8005,” said the judge, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam.
DHS unloads on teachers union boss over ‘dangerous rhetoric’ and anti-ICE activism
Imperiled House Democrat gets ripped by left and right after flip-flop on transgender sports
Conservatives Are Done with ‘They’re Going to Jail’ – Actually Give Us the Perp Walk
Cocky Singer, Trump Hater Miley Cyrus Breaks Humiliating Record, as Album Release Sees Historic Crash and Burn
Memphis City Council devolves into chaos after data center moratorium vote postponed
Rubio to deliver urgent plea to save Western civilization during speech in its birthplace
DHS orders deportation of illegal migrant who sold fraudulent DHS, FBI ‘immunity’ cards
Declassified docs raise questions about Jack Smith’s Trump trial testimony and more top headlines
Chinese military activity nearly doubles around key US ally in disputed waters
Mamdani’s $30M plan to fight antisemitism includes increased funding for anti-Israel group
Clarence Thomas’ Incisive Questions Expose Big Problem with ‘Climate Reparations’ Case
New York Times Campaigns for the Indiana Fever to Part with Sophie Cunningham Because of Conservatives
How Oct. 7 and Israel loom large over 2028 Democratic presidential race
Republicans are not talking about Trump’s biggest 2024 campaign promise
Federal judge blocks Trump administration fines of up to $1.8M for migrants
The administration’s “argument that the need for the requested border barrier construction funding was ‘unforeseen’ cannot logically be squared with the Administration’s multiple requests for funding for exactly that purpose dating back to at least early 2018,” he added.
The lawsuit also suggested that another $1.5 billion may be blocked because, in part, “the Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests in the areas known as El Paso Sector Project 1 and Yuma Sector Project 1.”
Gilliam was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014.
DHS unloads on teachers union boss over ‘dangerous rhetoric’ and anti-ICE activism
Imperiled House Democrat gets ripped by left and right after flip-flop on transgender sports
Conservatives Are Done with ‘They’re Going to Jail’ – Actually Give Us the Perp Walk
Cocky Singer, Trump Hater Miley Cyrus Breaks Humiliating Record, as Album Release Sees Historic Crash and Burn
Memphis City Council devolves into chaos after data center moratorium vote postponed
Rubio to deliver urgent plea to save Western civilization during speech in its birthplace
DHS orders deportation of illegal migrant who sold fraudulent DHS, FBI ‘immunity’ cards
Declassified docs raise questions about Jack Smith’s Trump trial testimony and more top headlines
Chinese military activity nearly doubles around key US ally in disputed waters
Mamdani’s $30M plan to fight antisemitism includes increased funding for anti-Israel group
Clarence Thomas’ Incisive Questions Expose Big Problem with ‘Climate Reparations’ Case
New York Times Campaigns for the Indiana Fever to Part with Sophie Cunningham Because of Conservatives
How Oct. 7 and Israel loom large over 2028 Democratic presidential race
Republicans are not talking about Trump’s biggest 2024 campaign promise
Federal judge blocks Trump administration fines of up to $1.8M for migrants
The case is Sierra Club, v. Trump, No. 19-cv-00892-HSG in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The decision can be read here.
Story cited here.









