News Opinons Politics

Judge Blocks Emergency $1 Billion for Border Wall

A federal judge in Oakland, California, is blocking a $1 billion portion of President Donald Trump’s $8 billion emergency budget for building the border wall.

The blocked project used $1 billion allocated by Congress for anti-drug accounts. The preliminary injunction will apply while the judge fully considers the lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which includes leaders from pro-migration and environmental groups, as well as from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

“Plaintiffs also have shown a likelihood of success as to their argument that Defendants fail to meet the ‘unforeseen military requirement’ condition for the reprogramming of funds under Section 8005,” said the judge, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam.



Luigi Mangione lawyers renew bid to toss death penalty charge, alleging Pam Bondi has a conflict of interest
Country Singer Jelly Roll Receives Full Pardon for Criminal Past
Brown University, MIT shootings: Are elite US universities prepared for targeted violence?
Over $9 Billion Looted from Minnesota Medicaid Programs in Massive Fraud Scheme: Feds
Oops: Democrat Brags About Jasmine Crockett Endorsement with a Photograph of a Completely Different Black Woman
Democrats reveal whether Walz should testify and be held accountable for massive fraud under his watch
Trump’s Venezuela oil blockade puts Chevron in the middle of a high-stakes sanctions crackdown
2026 elections to keep an eye on
Bannon calls Ben Shapiro a ‘cancer’ in Turning Point conference speech
Trump administration touts ‘most secure border in history’ as 2.5 million migrants exit US
DOJ’s Epstein disclosure draws fire for website glitches, missing documents, redactions
Here is what‘s in the Department of Justice’s latest Epstein files drop
Bill Gates Pictured with Females in New Epstein Files Photo Release
New Epstein files reveal photos of Bill Clinton posing with unidentified women
Just In: Epstein File Dump Features Bill Clinton Next to Redacted ‘Victims and/or Minors’ in Multiple Pics
See also  These members of Congress will leave their jobs (mostly) voluntarily

The administration’s “argument that the need for the requested border barrier construction funding was ‘unforeseen’ cannot logically be squared with the Administration’s multiple requests for funding for exactly that purpose dating back to at least early 2018,” he added.

The lawsuit also suggested that another $1.5 billion may be blocked because, in part, “the Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests in the areas known as El Paso Sector Project 1 and Yuma Sector Project 1.”

Gilliam was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014.


Luigi Mangione lawyers renew bid to toss death penalty charge, alleging Pam Bondi has a conflict of interest
Country Singer Jelly Roll Receives Full Pardon for Criminal Past
Brown University, MIT shootings: Are elite US universities prepared for targeted violence?
Over $9 Billion Looted from Minnesota Medicaid Programs in Massive Fraud Scheme: Feds
Oops: Democrat Brags About Jasmine Crockett Endorsement with a Photograph of a Completely Different Black Woman
Democrats reveal whether Walz should testify and be held accountable for massive fraud under his watch
Trump’s Venezuela oil blockade puts Chevron in the middle of a high-stakes sanctions crackdown
2026 elections to keep an eye on
Bannon calls Ben Shapiro a ‘cancer’ in Turning Point conference speech
Trump administration touts ‘most secure border in history’ as 2.5 million migrants exit US
DOJ’s Epstein disclosure draws fire for website glitches, missing documents, redactions
Here is what‘s in the Department of Justice’s latest Epstein files drop
Bill Gates Pictured with Females in New Epstein Files Photo Release
New Epstein files reveal photos of Bill Clinton posing with unidentified women
Just In: Epstein File Dump Features Bill Clinton Next to Redacted ‘Victims and/or Minors’ in Multiple Pics
See also  Tangled in fossil fuel interests, Obama’s energy secretary becomes a critic of Trump’s nuclear agenda

The case is Sierra Club, v. Trump, No. 19-cv-00892-HSG in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The decision can be read here.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter