A federal judge in Oakland, California, is blocking a $1 billion portion of President Donald Trump’s $8 billion emergency budget for building the border wall.
The blocked project used $1 billion allocated by Congress for anti-drug accounts. The preliminary injunction will apply while the judge fully considers the lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which includes leaders from pro-migration and environmental groups, as well as from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
“Plaintiffs also have shown a likelihood of success as to their argument that Defendants fail to meet the ‘unforeseen military requirement’ condition for the reprogramming of funds under Section 8005,” said the judge, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam.
Secret Service arrests two after car crash and barricade breach outside White House
Trump’s Sudden Reversal on Immigration Sparks Cries of ‘Betrayal’ from Conservatives, Cheers from Pro-Amnesty GOP Rep.
Kathy Hochul entertains massive political promotion as Democrats look ahead to 2028
Multiple Senate Republicans Throw a Wrench in John Thune’s Bid to Retain Leadership Spot
Bombshell Video – Trump Retreats on Deportations: ICE Operations ‘Too Tough,’ Deporting Millions ‘Pretty Far Right’
Bombshell Video – Trump Retreats on Deportations: ICE Operations ‘Too Tough,’ Deporting Millions ‘Pretty Far Right’
GOP faces daunting post-election test as grip on Congress nears end and more top headlines
Nvidia is ALL-IN on ‘Accelerated AI’
Nvidia is ALL-IN on ‘Accelerated AI’
Rubio defends Trump’s Iran war as not ‘necessarily popular, but necessary’
Rubio defends Trump’s Iran war as not ‘necessarily popular, but necessary’
Fake federal agents push seniors to turn savings into gold bars for couriers to collect
The next generation of workers is taking its talent and spending power to this Southern state
The next generation of workers is taking its talent and spending power to this Southern state
EXCLUSIVE: Trump’s FAA touts new AI-powered tool helping thousands of passengers avoid flight delays
The administration’s “argument that the need for the requested border barrier construction funding was ‘unforeseen’ cannot logically be squared with the Administration’s multiple requests for funding for exactly that purpose dating back to at least early 2018,” he added.
The lawsuit also suggested that another $1.5 billion may be blocked because, in part, “the Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests in the areas known as El Paso Sector Project 1 and Yuma Sector Project 1.”
Gilliam was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014.
Secret Service arrests two after car crash and barricade breach outside White House
Trump’s Sudden Reversal on Immigration Sparks Cries of ‘Betrayal’ from Conservatives, Cheers from Pro-Amnesty GOP Rep.
Kathy Hochul entertains massive political promotion as Democrats look ahead to 2028
Multiple Senate Republicans Throw a Wrench in John Thune’s Bid to Retain Leadership Spot
Bombshell Video – Trump Retreats on Deportations: ICE Operations ‘Too Tough,’ Deporting Millions ‘Pretty Far Right’
Bombshell Video – Trump Retreats on Deportations: ICE Operations ‘Too Tough,’ Deporting Millions ‘Pretty Far Right’
GOP faces daunting post-election test as grip on Congress nears end and more top headlines
Nvidia is ALL-IN on ‘Accelerated AI’
Nvidia is ALL-IN on ‘Accelerated AI’
Rubio defends Trump’s Iran war as not ‘necessarily popular, but necessary’
Rubio defends Trump’s Iran war as not ‘necessarily popular, but necessary’
Fake federal agents push seniors to turn savings into gold bars for couriers to collect
The next generation of workers is taking its talent and spending power to this Southern state
The next generation of workers is taking its talent and spending power to this Southern state
EXCLUSIVE: Trump’s FAA touts new AI-powered tool helping thousands of passengers avoid flight delays
The case is Sierra Club, v. Trump, No. 19-cv-00892-HSG in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The decision can be read here.
Story cited here.
