A federal judge in Oakland, California, is blocking a $1 billion portion of President Donald Trump’s $8 billion emergency budget for building the border wall.
The blocked project used $1 billion allocated by Congress for anti-drug accounts. The preliminary injunction will apply while the judge fully considers the lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which includes leaders from pro-migration and environmental groups, as well as from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
“Plaintiffs also have shown a likelihood of success as to their argument that Defendants fail to meet the ‘unforeseen military requirement’ condition for the reprogramming of funds under Section 8005,” said the judge, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam.
Trump fires judge-picked US attorney as top DOJ official warns courts to stay in their lane
Reporter’s Notebook: Trump’s State of the Union becomes political boxing match as Democrats boycott
First antifa terrorism trial restarts following mistrial: What you need to know
Newsom’s office rebuffs ‘MAGA-manufactured outrage’ on his SAT score statement
Judge permanently blocks release of Trump classified documents report
JPMorgan Makes Humiliating Admission in Trump’s $5 Billion Debanking Lawsuit
WATCH: ‘I Can Send a Military Plane or Something’ – Trump Called the US Men’s Hockey Team After Their Historic Win and Made an Offer They Couldn’t Refuse
Trump says Supreme Court ruling against birthright citizenship order would benefit China
Family member of armed man who breached Mar-a-Lago perimeter describes personality, politics
Death toll rises after Mexican drug cartel leader killed in US-backed operation
Americans stranded in Puerto Vallarta describe city turning into war zone and more top headlines
MAGA Right sours on Thune over SAVE Act fight
How Trump’s ICE Built Nationwide Police Alliance Right Under Democrats’ Noses
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: Thune Should Use This Trick to Get the SAVE Act Passed
DHS shutdown drags into week two as Iran threat, SOTU clash complicate Hill talks
The administration’s “argument that the need for the requested border barrier construction funding was ‘unforeseen’ cannot logically be squared with the Administration’s multiple requests for funding for exactly that purpose dating back to at least early 2018,” he added.
The lawsuit also suggested that another $1.5 billion may be blocked because, in part, “the Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests in the areas known as El Paso Sector Project 1 and Yuma Sector Project 1.”
Gilliam was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014.
Trump fires judge-picked US attorney as top DOJ official warns courts to stay in their lane
Reporter’s Notebook: Trump’s State of the Union becomes political boxing match as Democrats boycott
First antifa terrorism trial restarts following mistrial: What you need to know
Newsom’s office rebuffs ‘MAGA-manufactured outrage’ on his SAT score statement
Judge permanently blocks release of Trump classified documents report
JPMorgan Makes Humiliating Admission in Trump’s $5 Billion Debanking Lawsuit
WATCH: ‘I Can Send a Military Plane or Something’ – Trump Called the US Men’s Hockey Team After Their Historic Win and Made an Offer They Couldn’t Refuse
Trump says Supreme Court ruling against birthright citizenship order would benefit China
Family member of armed man who breached Mar-a-Lago perimeter describes personality, politics
Death toll rises after Mexican drug cartel leader killed in US-backed operation
Americans stranded in Puerto Vallarta describe city turning into war zone and more top headlines
MAGA Right sours on Thune over SAVE Act fight
How Trump’s ICE Built Nationwide Police Alliance Right Under Democrats’ Noses
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: Thune Should Use This Trick to Get the SAVE Act Passed
DHS shutdown drags into week two as Iran threat, SOTU clash complicate Hill talks
The case is Sierra Club, v. Trump, No. 19-cv-00892-HSG in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The decision can be read here.
Story cited here.









