A federal judge in Oakland, California, is blocking a $1 billion portion of President Donald Trump’s $8 billion emergency budget for building the border wall.
The blocked project used $1 billion allocated by Congress for anti-drug accounts. The preliminary injunction will apply while the judge fully considers the lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which includes leaders from pro-migration and environmental groups, as well as from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
“Plaintiffs also have shown a likelihood of success as to their argument that Defendants fail to meet the ‘unforeseen military requirement’ condition for the reprogramming of funds under Section 8005,” said the judge, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam.
Connecticut Dems Facing Legal Trouble in Desperate Attempt to Ban Glocks
Sanders says Platner has the ‘guts’ to fight billionaires despite growing scandal pileup
Ohio Gov. DeWine Revokes AI Data Center Tax Break Measures
Will the Force ever awaken?
High-profile convicts lobby for rumored Trump pardons ahead of 250th anniversary
Overall success: The small-town appeal of vintage workwear
Rubio braces for Hill grilling as Republicans join bid to curb Trump’s Iran war powers
From reality TV to city hall? Trump-backed Spencer Pratt soars in LA mayor race as Californians vote
Trump makes late-night endorsements in six states ahead of Tuesday primaries, including California
Florida beach toll booth worker killed after driver rams structure before getting stuck in sand, sheriff says
Jared Kushner’s overseas luxury resort project faces anti-corruption investigation amid violent protests
Senate Democrats offer little support as Platner faces new sexting controversy: ‘Staying out of it’
Texas teens accused of using dating apps to lure young men into violent robberies that left one victim shot
Meet the Left’s Merchant of Hate
The Truth About Genocide in America: What North American Indians Were Doing to Each Other When Europeans Arrived
The administration’s “argument that the need for the requested border barrier construction funding was ‘unforeseen’ cannot logically be squared with the Administration’s multiple requests for funding for exactly that purpose dating back to at least early 2018,” he added.
The lawsuit also suggested that another $1.5 billion may be blocked because, in part, “the Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests in the areas known as El Paso Sector Project 1 and Yuma Sector Project 1.”
Gilliam was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014.
Connecticut Dems Facing Legal Trouble in Desperate Attempt to Ban Glocks
Sanders says Platner has the ‘guts’ to fight billionaires despite growing scandal pileup
Ohio Gov. DeWine Revokes AI Data Center Tax Break Measures
Will the Force ever awaken?
High-profile convicts lobby for rumored Trump pardons ahead of 250th anniversary
Overall success: The small-town appeal of vintage workwear
Rubio braces for Hill grilling as Republicans join bid to curb Trump’s Iran war powers
From reality TV to city hall? Trump-backed Spencer Pratt soars in LA mayor race as Californians vote
Trump makes late-night endorsements in six states ahead of Tuesday primaries, including California
Florida beach toll booth worker killed after driver rams structure before getting stuck in sand, sheriff says
Jared Kushner’s overseas luxury resort project faces anti-corruption investigation amid violent protests
Senate Democrats offer little support as Platner faces new sexting controversy: ‘Staying out of it’
Texas teens accused of using dating apps to lure young men into violent robberies that left one victim shot
Meet the Left’s Merchant of Hate
The Truth About Genocide in America: What North American Indians Were Doing to Each Other When Europeans Arrived
The case is Sierra Club, v. Trump, No. 19-cv-00892-HSG in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The decision can be read here.
Story cited here.









