A federal judge in Oakland, California, is blocking a $1 billion portion of President Donald Trump’s $8 billion emergency budget for building the border wall.
The blocked project used $1 billion allocated by Congress for anti-drug accounts. The preliminary injunction will apply while the judge fully considers the lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which includes leaders from pro-migration and environmental groups, as well as from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
“Plaintiffs also have shown a likelihood of success as to their argument that Defendants fail to meet the ‘unforeseen military requirement’ condition for the reprogramming of funds under Section 8005,” said the judge, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam.
Medicaid provider allegedly billed $165K for dead patient’s rides among fraud exposed in explosive report
Former Republican House Speaker Dennis Hastert dead at 84
Russian researcher who studied plague died of mysterious illness: What to know
WATCH: Hasan Piker Reminds James Talarico About His Liberal Puppet Masters: ‘He’s Got to Play Ball’
Arizona State cheerleader charged after confrontation with police caught on viral video
Coast Guard Issues Sad Announcement on Search for Downed Medical Plane Near Nantucket
Catholic schools, banned rifles and ‘climate lawfare’: Blockbuster fights await Supreme Court
California realtor accused of spying for China caught at LAX and more top headlines
Green New Deal Lovers Beware: Senate Deal Would Cut the Six-Year Stall on Pipelines and Gas Plants to 150 Days
WATCH: GOP senators skeptical of Bill Gates’ ‘fearmongering’ AI warning as Dems sound alarm
Meet the AI doomsday death cult connected to a cross-country killing spree
Democrat, Leftist Ties to Suspected Serial Killer, Violent Pornographer Emerge as House of Horrors Case Grows
From doubted to dominant: Fox News turns 30 and looks to the future
Wall Street has a new rival, and it’s deep in the heart of this southern state
AI is supercharging political ad wars. But viral doesn’t mean victorious
The administration’s “argument that the need for the requested border barrier construction funding was ‘unforeseen’ cannot logically be squared with the Administration’s multiple requests for funding for exactly that purpose dating back to at least early 2018,” he added.
The lawsuit also suggested that another $1.5 billion may be blocked because, in part, “the Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests in the areas known as El Paso Sector Project 1 and Yuma Sector Project 1.”
Gilliam was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014.
Medicaid provider allegedly billed $165K for dead patient’s rides among fraud exposed in explosive report
Former Republican House Speaker Dennis Hastert dead at 84
Russian researcher who studied plague died of mysterious illness: What to know
WATCH: Hasan Piker Reminds James Talarico About His Liberal Puppet Masters: ‘He’s Got to Play Ball’
Arizona State cheerleader charged after confrontation with police caught on viral video
Coast Guard Issues Sad Announcement on Search for Downed Medical Plane Near Nantucket
Catholic schools, banned rifles and ‘climate lawfare’: Blockbuster fights await Supreme Court
California realtor accused of spying for China caught at LAX and more top headlines
Green New Deal Lovers Beware: Senate Deal Would Cut the Six-Year Stall on Pipelines and Gas Plants to 150 Days
WATCH: GOP senators skeptical of Bill Gates’ ‘fearmongering’ AI warning as Dems sound alarm
Meet the AI doomsday death cult connected to a cross-country killing spree
Democrat, Leftist Ties to Suspected Serial Killer, Violent Pornographer Emerge as House of Horrors Case Grows
From doubted to dominant: Fox News turns 30 and looks to the future
Wall Street has a new rival, and it’s deep in the heart of this southern state
AI is supercharging political ad wars. But viral doesn’t mean victorious
The case is Sierra Club, v. Trump, No. 19-cv-00892-HSG in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The decision can be read here.
Story cited here.
