Fox News’ Ed Henry reported Tuesday evening that Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell has declassified information calling into question the conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump.
Henry told Tucker Carlson on Tucker Carlson Tonight that the new information would suggest that John Brennan, who headed the Central Intelligence Agency under President Barack Obama, “also had intel saying, actually, Russia wanted Hillary Clinton to win because she was a known quantity, she had been secretary of state, and Vladimir Putin’s team thought she was more malleable, while candidate Donald Trump was unpredictable.”
Former National Security Council chief of staff Fred Fleitz made a similar claim in an article on FoxNews.com April 22:
House Intelligence Committee staff told me that after an exhaustive investigation reviewing intelligence and interviewing intelligence officers, they found that Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.
Instead, the Brennan team included low-quality intelligence that failed to meet intelligence community standards to support the political claim that Russian officials wanted Trump to win, House Intelligence Committee staff revealed. They said that CIA analysts also objected to including that flawed, substandard information in the assessment.
On Tuesday, Henry said that he had obtained independent confirmation of the claims made by Fleitz in that report.
EU admits it ‘didn’t have control’ on migration as bloc rushes crackdown ahead of new rules
AOC-backed $25 minimum wage plan sounds great — but at what cost?
California man sentenced to prison for using pickaxe to kill teen brother with cerebral palsy
Two planes come within 500 feet of each other while approaching JFK Airport in latest close call
South Carolina inmate who believes he is immortal cannot be executed due to mental illness, judge rules
Trump marks Cinco de Mayo with ‘NICE’ post, echoing past viral taco bowl moment
Family of Murdered College Student Furious as Killer Learns His Sentence: ‘It’s Not Enough’
Family makes terrifying discovery in basement following growing suspicions
Comer demands records after DC police leaders sidelined amid alleged crime data manipulation
Government Sues New York Times for Alleged Discrimination Against White Man
Obama’s Recent Political Moves Have Caused ‘Genuine Tension’ with Michelle
Trump’s grip on GOP tested in Indiana as primary battles target defiant Republicans
Trump-backed Vivek Ramaswamy wins Ohio GOP gubernatorial primary, will face Democrat Amy Acton
Sherrod Brown secures Ohio Dem nomination, faces GOP’s Husted in key battle for Senate majority
Trump Makes Bombshell Comment About Arming Iranian Protesters
For three years, the received wisdom in Washington has been that 17 intelligence agencies concluded that Russia had interfered in the election to help Trump win. It then transpired that only four agencies had actually been involved.
The Senate Intelligence Committee, chaired by embattled Republican Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC), issued a report last month that appeared to confirm the work of the intelligence agencies.
However, that conclusion may soon be contradicted.
President Trump has accepted the claim that Russia interfered in the election — though he does not believe Russia actually helped him win, and he has publicly cast doubt on the idea that Russia preferred him over Clinton, his Democratic rival.
Breitbart News noted in 2017: “[T]he Russians may just as well have preferred Hillary Clinton, who had given Russia everything it wanted while serving as President Barack Obama’s Secretary of State — from the ill-fated “reset,” to a surrender of U.S. missile defenses in Eastern Europe, to the sale of 20% of America’s uranium reserves to a Russian company closely tied to the Russian state.”
“This could be a bombshell,” Henry told Carlson on Tuesday.
Story cited here.
