Fox News’ Ed Henry reported Tuesday evening that Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell has declassified information calling into question the conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump.
Henry told Tucker Carlson on Tucker Carlson Tonight that the new information would suggest that John Brennan, who headed the Central Intelligence Agency under President Barack Obama, “also had intel saying, actually, Russia wanted Hillary Clinton to win because she was a known quantity, she had been secretary of state, and Vladimir Putin’s team thought she was more malleable, while candidate Donald Trump was unpredictable.”
Former National Security Council chief of staff Fred Fleitz made a similar claim in an article on FoxNews.com April 22:
House Intelligence Committee staff told me that after an exhaustive investigation reviewing intelligence and interviewing intelligence officers, they found that Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.
Instead, the Brennan team included low-quality intelligence that failed to meet intelligence community standards to support the political claim that Russian officials wanted Trump to win, House Intelligence Committee staff revealed. They said that CIA analysts also objected to including that flawed, substandard information in the assessment.
On Tuesday, Henry said that he had obtained independent confirmation of the claims made by Fleitz in that report.
House Dems unveil bill to examine removing Trump using 25th Amendment
Socialist Mamdani touts government-run grocery plan as ‘grand experiment’’ at grocery new site
Blasphemous California Tech Company Offers Paid Video Calls with AI ‘Jesus’ Avatar
San Francisco Put in Subway Turnstiles That Can’t Be Jumped – Maintenance Dropped 96 Percent
Appeals court shuts down Boasberg contempt inquiry into Trump administration over El Salvador deportations
Kash Patel taunts Swalwell with FBI sit-down as resignation fallout grows
Mamdani’s government-run grocery stores will fail ‘like every socialist experiment’: economist
Saudi Arabia Pushes Trump Admin to End Strait of Hormuz Blockade Over Fears About Repercussions: Report
Cop who killed drug suspect with Igloo cooler appeals conviction that made him an example
Husband of missing American woman will remain in Bahamas after jail release, attorney says
‘I Do Nothing for the Approval of Man’: Riley Gaines Responds After Trump Says He’s ‘Not a Big Fan’ of Hers
DOJ Signals Probe Into Brutal Assault of Conservative Journalist Filming Anti-ICE Riot
Far-left Senate hopeful’s radical ties to ‘Maduro cronies’ could torpedo campaign: ‘Tired of the chaos’
Push to oust Trump exposes cracks among Democrats on strategy, timing
George Conway Chokes Back Tears Talking About Blowing Nearly $1M on Joe Biden
For three years, the received wisdom in Washington has been that 17 intelligence agencies concluded that Russia had interfered in the election to help Trump win. It then transpired that only four agencies had actually been involved.
The Senate Intelligence Committee, chaired by embattled Republican Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC), issued a report last month that appeared to confirm the work of the intelligence agencies.
However, that conclusion may soon be contradicted.
President Trump has accepted the claim that Russia interfered in the election — though he does not believe Russia actually helped him win, and he has publicly cast doubt on the idea that Russia preferred him over Clinton, his Democratic rival.
Breitbart News noted in 2017: “[T]he Russians may just as well have preferred Hillary Clinton, who had given Russia everything it wanted while serving as President Barack Obama’s Secretary of State — from the ill-fated “reset,” to a surrender of U.S. missile defenses in Eastern Europe, to the sale of 20% of America’s uranium reserves to a Russian company closely tied to the Russian state.”
“This could be a bombshell,” Henry told Carlson on Tuesday.
Story cited here.
