Fox News’ Ed Henry reported Tuesday evening that Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell has declassified information calling into question the conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump.
Henry told Tucker Carlson on Tucker Carlson Tonight that the new information would suggest that John Brennan, who headed the Central Intelligence Agency under President Barack Obama, “also had intel saying, actually, Russia wanted Hillary Clinton to win because she was a known quantity, she had been secretary of state, and Vladimir Putin’s team thought she was more malleable, while candidate Donald Trump was unpredictable.”
Former National Security Council chief of staff Fred Fleitz made a similar claim in an article on FoxNews.com April 22:
House Intelligence Committee staff told me that after an exhaustive investigation reviewing intelligence and interviewing intelligence officers, they found that Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.
Instead, the Brennan team included low-quality intelligence that failed to meet intelligence community standards to support the political claim that Russian officials wanted Trump to win, House Intelligence Committee staff revealed. They said that CIA analysts also objected to including that flawed, substandard information in the assessment.
On Tuesday, Henry said that he had obtained independent confirmation of the claims made by Fleitz in that report.
Trump admin sued by New York, New Jersey over Hudson River tunnel funding freeze: ‘See you in court’
White House approves Medal of Honor for fallen Army Staff Sgt Michael Ollis after years-long push
Lawmakers probe National FFA over Chinese Communist Party ties and DEI programs
Mamdani calls on DA to not prosecute mentally ill man shot by police during knife attack
Reps. Anna Paulina Luna and Tim Burchett Drop SAVE Act Demands After Meeting with Trump
Trump reacts to NBC host Savannah Guthrie’s mother Nancy’s mysterious abduction
Op-Ed: Trump is a Performer – Let Him Perform
California business group unveils Times Square billboard comparing Newsom to NY Jets during Super Bowl week
Trump shames CNN’s Kaitlan Collins for not smiling when asking president about Epstein survivors
Mike Johnson backs ‘America Is Back!’ message as Trump debuts new hat design
These are the 21 House Republicans who held out against Trump, Johnson on $1.2T spending bill
Jill Biden’s Ex-Husband Charged with Murder
Breaking: Apparent Ransom Note Emerges in Nancy Guthrie Disappearance
Video: Ana Navarro on ‘The View’ Launches Unhinged, Incoherent Attack Against ‘Cross-Wearing’ Christians She Doesn’t Like
Kristi Noem Issues Blistering Response to ‘Ill-Informed Famous Musicians’ Who Attacked ICE at Grammys
For three years, the received wisdom in Washington has been that 17 intelligence agencies concluded that Russia had interfered in the election to help Trump win. It then transpired that only four agencies had actually been involved.
The Senate Intelligence Committee, chaired by embattled Republican Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC), issued a report last month that appeared to confirm the work of the intelligence agencies.
However, that conclusion may soon be contradicted.
President Trump has accepted the claim that Russia interfered in the election — though he does not believe Russia actually helped him win, and he has publicly cast doubt on the idea that Russia preferred him over Clinton, his Democratic rival.
Breitbart News noted in 2017: “[T]he Russians may just as well have preferred Hillary Clinton, who had given Russia everything it wanted while serving as President Barack Obama’s Secretary of State — from the ill-fated “reset,” to a surrender of U.S. missile defenses in Eastern Europe, to the sale of 20% of America’s uranium reserves to a Russian company closely tied to the Russian state.”
“This could be a bombshell,” Henry told Carlson on Tuesday.
Story cited here.
