Fox News’ Ed Henry reported Tuesday evening that Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell has declassified information calling into question the conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump.
Henry told Tucker Carlson on Tucker Carlson Tonight that the new information would suggest that John Brennan, who headed the Central Intelligence Agency under President Barack Obama, “also had intel saying, actually, Russia wanted Hillary Clinton to win because she was a known quantity, she had been secretary of state, and Vladimir Putin’s team thought she was more malleable, while candidate Donald Trump was unpredictable.”
Former National Security Council chief of staff Fred Fleitz made a similar claim in an article on FoxNews.com April 22:
House Intelligence Committee staff told me that after an exhaustive investigation reviewing intelligence and interviewing intelligence officers, they found that Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.
Instead, the Brennan team included low-quality intelligence that failed to meet intelligence community standards to support the political claim that Russian officials wanted Trump to win, House Intelligence Committee staff revealed. They said that CIA analysts also objected to including that flawed, substandard information in the assessment.
On Tuesday, Henry said that he had obtained independent confirmation of the claims made by Fleitz in that report.
Trump says Supreme Court ruling against birthright citizenship order would benefit China
Family member of armed man who breached Mar-a-Lago perimeter describes personality, politics
MAGA Right sours on Thune over SAVE Act fight
How Trump’s ICE Built Nationwide Police Alliance Right Under Democrats’ Noses
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: Thune Should Use This Trick to Get the SAVE Act Passed
DHS shutdown drags into week two as Iran threat, SOTU clash complicate Hill talks
Who is Abigail Spanberger, and why did Democrats choose her for to their State of the Union response?
Trump invites US men’s hockey team to attend State of the Union speech
Greenland rejects Trump’s hospital ship: ‘No thanks’
‘It’s hidden’: Female genital mutilation and the secret shame of Minnesota’s Somalis
Greenland rejects Trump’s hospital ship proposal, citing existing free healthcare system
USA Men’s Hockey Wins First Gold Medal Since 1980 ‘Miracle on Ice’
AOC blames critics, Trump after Munich hiccup backlash
President Trump tells Netflix to fire Susan Rice or ‘pay consequences’
Rafter vanishes in Oregon wilderness, survives five-day ordeal before helicopter rescue
For three years, the received wisdom in Washington has been that 17 intelligence agencies concluded that Russia had interfered in the election to help Trump win. It then transpired that only four agencies had actually been involved.
The Senate Intelligence Committee, chaired by embattled Republican Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC), issued a report last month that appeared to confirm the work of the intelligence agencies.
However, that conclusion may soon be contradicted.
President Trump has accepted the claim that Russia interfered in the election — though he does not believe Russia actually helped him win, and he has publicly cast doubt on the idea that Russia preferred him over Clinton, his Democratic rival.
Breitbart News noted in 2017: “[T]he Russians may just as well have preferred Hillary Clinton, who had given Russia everything it wanted while serving as President Barack Obama’s Secretary of State — from the ill-fated “reset,” to a surrender of U.S. missile defenses in Eastern Europe, to the sale of 20% of America’s uranium reserves to a Russian company closely tied to the Russian state.”
“This could be a bombshell,” Henry told Carlson on Tuesday.
Story cited here.
