Fox News’ Ed Henry reported Tuesday evening that Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell has declassified information calling into question the conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump.
Henry told Tucker Carlson on Tucker Carlson Tonight that the new information would suggest that John Brennan, who headed the Central Intelligence Agency under President Barack Obama, “also had intel saying, actually, Russia wanted Hillary Clinton to win because she was a known quantity, she had been secretary of state, and Vladimir Putin’s team thought she was more malleable, while candidate Donald Trump was unpredictable.”
Former National Security Council chief of staff Fred Fleitz made a similar claim in an article on FoxNews.com April 22:
House Intelligence Committee staff told me that after an exhaustive investigation reviewing intelligence and interviewing intelligence officers, they found that Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.
Instead, the Brennan team included low-quality intelligence that failed to meet intelligence community standards to support the political claim that Russian officials wanted Trump to win, House Intelligence Committee staff revealed. They said that CIA analysts also objected to including that flawed, substandard information in the assessment.
On Tuesday, Henry said that he had obtained independent confirmation of the claims made by Fleitz in that report.
DOJ Releases Massive Trove of Epstein Files Documents, Statement on Trump Involvement
Rep Jeffries escalates rhetoric against Noem, says DHS leader should be ‘put on ice permanently’
‘Opening Pandora’s Box’: Mike Johnson backs Trump after warning White House about deal with Democrats
Pam Bondi Releases Video Statement After the Arrest of Don Lemon: ‘We Are Coming After You’
Panama court cancels Hong Kong canal contracts, handing Trump win
Federal judge strikes down parts of Trump executive order on citizenship verification for voter registration
With Trump weighing military operations against Iran, questions remain on targets and objectives
Hillary Clinton’s Hit Piece Against Several Christian Leaders Doesn’t Get the Response She Was Hoping for: ‘I’ve Never Been More Proud’
Looming government shutdown threatens service members, FEMA, TSA amid ICE impasse
Don Lemon Charged with Civil Rights Crimes for St. Paul Church Storming
Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: Dems target military college, anti-ICE nurse fury, more union follies
California woman arrested after allegedly beheading boyfriend, fleeing to Mexico
Pastor of Cities Church Speaks Out After Don Lemon’s Arrest
Behind the scenes: Trump and White House rally behind Noem as ‘radicals’ demand ouster
US escalates sanctions on Iranian officials as Trump considers military options
For three years, the received wisdom in Washington has been that 17 intelligence agencies concluded that Russia had interfered in the election to help Trump win. It then transpired that only four agencies had actually been involved.
The Senate Intelligence Committee, chaired by embattled Republican Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC), issued a report last month that appeared to confirm the work of the intelligence agencies.
However, that conclusion may soon be contradicted.
President Trump has accepted the claim that Russia interfered in the election — though he does not believe Russia actually helped him win, and he has publicly cast doubt on the idea that Russia preferred him over Clinton, his Democratic rival.
Breitbart News noted in 2017: “[T]he Russians may just as well have preferred Hillary Clinton, who had given Russia everything it wanted while serving as President Barack Obama’s Secretary of State — from the ill-fated “reset,” to a surrender of U.S. missile defenses in Eastern Europe, to the sale of 20% of America’s uranium reserves to a Russian company closely tied to the Russian state.”
“This could be a bombshell,” Henry told Carlson on Tuesday.
Story cited here.
