Fox News’ Ed Henry reported Tuesday evening that Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell has declassified information calling into question the conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump.
Henry told Tucker Carlson on Tucker Carlson Tonight that the new information would suggest that John Brennan, who headed the Central Intelligence Agency under President Barack Obama, “also had intel saying, actually, Russia wanted Hillary Clinton to win because she was a known quantity, she had been secretary of state, and Vladimir Putin’s team thought she was more malleable, while candidate Donald Trump was unpredictable.”
Former National Security Council chief of staff Fred Fleitz made a similar claim in an article on FoxNews.com April 22:
House Intelligence Committee staff told me that after an exhaustive investigation reviewing intelligence and interviewing intelligence officers, they found that Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.
Instead, the Brennan team included low-quality intelligence that failed to meet intelligence community standards to support the political claim that Russian officials wanted Trump to win, House Intelligence Committee staff revealed. They said that CIA analysts also objected to including that flawed, substandard information in the assessment.
On Tuesday, Henry said that he had obtained independent confirmation of the claims made by Fleitz in that report.
Florida man arrested for allegedly pointing lasers at passenger aircraft at international airport: police
Officials knew Manhattan Project chemicals disposed improperly at Missouri sites, documents reveal
Alabama lawmakers advance bill that could lead to prosecution of librarians
It’s the 1950s All Over Again: GOP Turns to Nat’l Guard to Protect Minority Students from Radical Dems, Leftists
New Republican challenger to Elizabeth Warren says ‘no one has disappointed Massachusetts more’
NFL Pro Bowler Humbles Mouthy High Schooler with a Simple Question
US Navy Converting Oil Rigs Into Active Missile Launch Stations with Five Times the Capacity of a Destroyer
Minneapolis ordinance imposes highest minimum cigarette price in America
The Best Mario Is a Flat Cutout: Everything You Need to Know About ‘Paper Mario’
Tennessee nears law banning adults from helping minors find, receive sex reassignment care
What Was Spotted Under a Chinese Bomber Looks Just Like Piece of American Tech Lost Over China
Early in-person voting starts for North Carolina primary runoffs
Chicago Cubs Pitcher Forced to Remove Glove with American Flag Because it Was a ‘Distraction’
Blue state in battle over AG’s illegal immigration dictate that ‘handcuffs’ police
NY v. Trump: Tabloid publisher testifies he bought stories on Tiger Woods, ex-Obama chief of staff
For three years, the received wisdom in Washington has been that 17 intelligence agencies concluded that Russia had interfered in the election to help Trump win. It then transpired that only four agencies had actually been involved.
The Senate Intelligence Committee, chaired by embattled Republican Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC), issued a report last month that appeared to confirm the work of the intelligence agencies.
However, that conclusion may soon be contradicted.
President Trump has accepted the claim that Russia interfered in the election — though he does not believe Russia actually helped him win, and he has publicly cast doubt on the idea that Russia preferred him over Clinton, his Democratic rival.
Breitbart News noted in 2017: “[T]he Russians may just as well have preferred Hillary Clinton, who had given Russia everything it wanted while serving as President Barack Obama’s Secretary of State — from the ill-fated “reset,” to a surrender of U.S. missile defenses in Eastern Europe, to the sale of 20% of America’s uranium reserves to a Russian company closely tied to the Russian state.”
“This could be a bombshell,” Henry told Carlson on Tuesday.
Story cited here.
Scroll down to leave a comment:
