Fox News’ Ed Henry reported Tuesday evening that Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell has declassified information calling into question the conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump.
Henry told Tucker Carlson on Tucker Carlson Tonight that the new information would suggest that John Brennan, who headed the Central Intelligence Agency under President Barack Obama, “also had intel saying, actually, Russia wanted Hillary Clinton to win because she was a known quantity, she had been secretary of state, and Vladimir Putin’s team thought she was more malleable, while candidate Donald Trump was unpredictable.”
Former National Security Council chief of staff Fred Fleitz made a similar claim in an article on FoxNews.com April 22:
House Intelligence Committee staff told me that after an exhaustive investigation reviewing intelligence and interviewing intelligence officers, they found that Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.
Instead, the Brennan team included low-quality intelligence that failed to meet intelligence community standards to support the political claim that Russian officials wanted Trump to win, House Intelligence Committee staff revealed. They said that CIA analysts also objected to including that flawed, substandard information in the assessment.
On Tuesday, Henry said that he had obtained independent confirmation of the claims made by Fleitz in that report.
Archaeologists Unearth Amazing Biblical Site in Jerusalem: It May Be the Site Where Christ Performed a Miracle
Erika Kirk Sends Powerful Message to ‘Evildoers’ Behind Assassination: ‘You Have No Idea What You… Unleashed’
White House closes week mourning Charlie Kirk, remembering 9/11 terrorist attacks in NY
Kash Patel’s false start on Charlie Kirk killer draws scrutiny, but FBI nabbed suspect in the end
Following Kirk’s assassination, lawmakers react to lethal political climate: ‘Violent words precede violent actions’
Why China wants to build a nature reserve in the South China Sea
California legislature passes bill prohibiting law enforcement from wearing face masks to shield identities
Utah students lift voices in prayer at vigil for Charlie Kirk’s Christian legacy: ‘Felt called by God’
Connecticut GOP accuses Democratic school board chairman of celebrating Charlie Kirk’s murder
Democratic donors reluctant to give to Biden’s presidential library: report
Charlie Kirk’s widow tells America: ‘You have no idea what you have unleashed’
Erika Kirk delivers moving tribute to husband, Charlie: ‘I will never let your legacy die’
Ivanka Trump Makes Rare TV Appearance to Honor Charlie Kirk
Legal analyst calls for more arrests in Charlie Kirk assassination
Former agents praise FBI and partners’ work on Kirk manhunt: ‘It’s very impressive’
For three years, the received wisdom in Washington has been that 17 intelligence agencies concluded that Russia had interfered in the election to help Trump win. It then transpired that only four agencies had actually been involved.
The Senate Intelligence Committee, chaired by embattled Republican Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC), issued a report last month that appeared to confirm the work of the intelligence agencies.
However, that conclusion may soon be contradicted.
President Trump has accepted the claim that Russia interfered in the election — though he does not believe Russia actually helped him win, and he has publicly cast doubt on the idea that Russia preferred him over Clinton, his Democratic rival.
Breitbart News noted in 2017: “[T]he Russians may just as well have preferred Hillary Clinton, who had given Russia everything it wanted while serving as President Barack Obama’s Secretary of State — from the ill-fated “reset,” to a surrender of U.S. missile defenses in Eastern Europe, to the sale of 20% of America’s uranium reserves to a Russian company closely tied to the Russian state.”
“This could be a bombshell,” Henry told Carlson on Tuesday.
Story cited here.
