Fox News’ Ed Henry reported Tuesday evening that Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell has declassified information calling into question the conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump.
Henry told Tucker Carlson on Tucker Carlson Tonight that the new information would suggest that John Brennan, who headed the Central Intelligence Agency under President Barack Obama, “also had intel saying, actually, Russia wanted Hillary Clinton to win because she was a known quantity, she had been secretary of state, and Vladimir Putin’s team thought she was more malleable, while candidate Donald Trump was unpredictable.”
Former National Security Council chief of staff Fred Fleitz made a similar claim in an article on FoxNews.com April 22:
House Intelligence Committee staff told me that after an exhaustive investigation reviewing intelligence and interviewing intelligence officers, they found that Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.
Instead, the Brennan team included low-quality intelligence that failed to meet intelligence community standards to support the political claim that Russian officials wanted Trump to win, House Intelligence Committee staff revealed. They said that CIA analysts also objected to including that flawed, substandard information in the assessment.
On Tuesday, Henry said that he had obtained independent confirmation of the claims made by Fleitz in that report.
Former Freedom Caucus chair Bob Good blasts Trump’s endorsement record: ‘Trump IS the problem’
Tom Cotton puts Biden on notice while demanding answers on draining of nation’s oil stockpile
Beloved 75-year-old math teacher found dead inside Baltimore elementary school
FBI arrests alleged MS-13 member accused in El Salvador pastor’s killing
EXCLUSIVE: ICE says El Paso detention facility will stay open under new contractor after $1.2B deal scrapped
WATCH: NYC terror suspect allegedly seen purchasing fireworks fuse days before attack
Michigan man found guilty of killing wife whose body was discovered in fertilizer tank
Sen. Hyde-Smith set for November clash with Dem foe she once vanquished
9th Circuit upholds first grader’s free speech rights in ‘black lives matter’ drawing case
Special election replacing Marjorie Taylor Greene goes to runoff between Trump-endorsed candidate and Democrat
Trump Says Family Bible from His Mother Has a Powerful Revival Connection
Speaker Johnson touts Trump’s agenda as crucial blueprint ahead of midterms: ‘On the ballot’
Brett Kavanaugh Fires Back as Ketanji Brown Jackson Gets Hostile While Two Share Stage at Event
After Daughter Is Allegedly Killed by Illegal, Mom Opens Victim’s Bible and Finds Incredible Surprise Note
DOJ blasts ‘partisan’ DC Bar complaint against senior Trump official
For three years, the received wisdom in Washington has been that 17 intelligence agencies concluded that Russia had interfered in the election to help Trump win. It then transpired that only four agencies had actually been involved.
The Senate Intelligence Committee, chaired by embattled Republican Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC), issued a report last month that appeared to confirm the work of the intelligence agencies.
However, that conclusion may soon be contradicted.
President Trump has accepted the claim that Russia interfered in the election — though he does not believe Russia actually helped him win, and he has publicly cast doubt on the idea that Russia preferred him over Clinton, his Democratic rival.
Breitbart News noted in 2017: “[T]he Russians may just as well have preferred Hillary Clinton, who had given Russia everything it wanted while serving as President Barack Obama’s Secretary of State — from the ill-fated “reset,” to a surrender of U.S. missile defenses in Eastern Europe, to the sale of 20% of America’s uranium reserves to a Russian company closely tied to the Russian state.”
“This could be a bombshell,” Henry told Carlson on Tuesday.
Story cited here.
