Former Vice President Joe Biden, the 2020 Democrat frontrunner for president, lied in 1987 during his first of many runs for the Oval Office by claiming he marched in the Civil Rights Movement–something he never did.
The New York Times‘ Matt Flegenheimer, in a Monday report, resurfaced the 1987 lie by Biden before an audience in New Hampshire, where he was campaigning for the Democrat nomination for president for the first time in his long political career.
“When I marched in the civil rights movement, I did not march with a 12-point program,” Biden said in New Hampshire in February 1987, according to the Times. “I marched with tens of thousands of others to change attitudes. And we changed attitudes.”
Flegenheimer, in describing the incident, writes that Biden was “riffing again,” including “an R.F.K. anecdote, a word about ‘civil wrongs,’ a meandering joke about the baseball commissioner,” and that Biden’s “aides knew enough to worry a little” given his tendency to make gaffes that severely hurt his political opportunities.
And when Biden made that false claim that he had marched in the Civil Rights Movement when in fact he had not done any such marching, his aides cringed, per the Times’Flegenheimer.
Five Republicans Break Ranks With Trump on Venezuela, Cripple His Ability to Use Military in Country Again
Fiery But Mostly Peaceful Rhetoric: Huge NYC Crowd Chants That They’ll Kill Noem, ICE Agents
Minnesota ICE shooting ignites debate over federal officer immunity
Watchdog exposes taxpayer-funded teacher program for banning White applicants: ‘Likely illegal’
Thousands already applied for Minnesota’s new paid leave program open to illegal immigrants
Venezuela raid is about the oil — keeping it from Russia and China
President Trump says there won’t be a ‘second Wave of Attacks’ against Venezuela due to their ‘cooperation’
Brigitte Bardot, 1934–2025
Washington’s echo: America and Europe at a crossroads once more
A decade without David Bowie
Catholic group asks SCOTUS to block California law against revealing students’ gender identities to parents
White House says East Wing demolition was necessary due to structural issues
Trump plans to meet with Venezuela opposition leader Maria Corina Machado next week
550-pound bear finally evicted from California home after bizarre strategy ends monthlong ordeal
Naked woman allegedly assaults deputy while intoxicated, claims she was ‘trying to be a mermaid’
“More than once, advisers had gently reminded Mr. Biden of the problem with this formulation: He had not actually marched during the civil rights movement,” Flegenheimer wrote. “And more than once, Mr. Biden assured them he understood — and kept telling the story anyway.”
A few months later, in September 1987, Flegenheimer writes that Biden’s lies and “recklessness as a candidate” had finally “caught up with him.”
“He was accused of plagiarizing in campaign speeches,” Flegenheimer wrote. “He had inflated his academic record. Reporters began calling out his exaggerated youth activism.”
On Capitol Hill, Flegenheimer writes, Biden called a “stop-the-bleeding news conference” at which he “vowed that day to fight on.”
“I’ve done some dumb things,” Biden said at that presser. “And I’ll do dumb things again.”
Despite his vow to fight through the mess and keep campaigning for the Democrat nomination for president, Flegenheimer writes, Biden “quit the race within a week.”
“Thirty-two years later, as Mr. Biden seeks the presidency for a third time, his disastrous campaign for the 1988 Democratic nomination offers a revealing look at the personal tics and political flaws of the front-runner in the 2020 race — traits that, in many ways, continue to color Mr. Biden’s public life,” Flegenheimer writes.
Five Republicans Break Ranks With Trump on Venezuela, Cripple His Ability to Use Military in Country Again
Fiery But Mostly Peaceful Rhetoric: Huge NYC Crowd Chants That They’ll Kill Noem, ICE Agents
Minnesota ICE shooting ignites debate over federal officer immunity
Watchdog exposes taxpayer-funded teacher program for banning White applicants: ‘Likely illegal’
Thousands already applied for Minnesota’s new paid leave program open to illegal immigrants
Venezuela raid is about the oil — keeping it from Russia and China
President Trump says there won’t be a ‘second Wave of Attacks’ against Venezuela due to their ‘cooperation’
Brigitte Bardot, 1934–2025
Washington’s echo: America and Europe at a crossroads once more
A decade without David Bowie
Catholic group asks SCOTUS to block California law against revealing students’ gender identities to parents
White House says East Wing demolition was necessary due to structural issues
Trump plans to meet with Venezuela opposition leader Maria Corina Machado next week
550-pound bear finally evicted from California home after bizarre strategy ends monthlong ordeal
Naked woman allegedly assaults deputy while intoxicated, claims she was ‘trying to be a mermaid’
These revelations about Biden falsely claiming to have marched in the Civil Rights Movement come on the heels of other recently resurfaced comments that Biden made in 1973, when as a newly elected U.S. Senator he made a number of racially insensitive remarks.
In addition to lecturing the City Club in Cleveland on what Biden believed was “good for the Negro,” the then newly-elected U.S. Senator laid out his ardent opposition to being held accountable for racial divisions in America. The comments surfaced in a book published by Ryan Grim, a leftist journalist and editor at the Intercept.
“Joe Biden, elected to the Senate in 1972, was a leading voice in the attempt to win back white working-class voters by showing them how tough Democrats could be against affirmative [action], school integration, and other priorities of the civil rights movement,” Grim writes in a section of his book. He added:
I do not buy the concept, popular in the ’60s, which said, “We have suppressed the black man for 300 years and the white man is now far ahead in the race for everything our society offers. In order to even the score, we must now give the black man a head start, or even hold the white man back, to even the race. I don’t buy that,” Biden told a Delaware weekly newspaper in 1975. “I don’t feel responsible for the sins of my father and grandfather.I feel responsible for what the situation is today, for the sins of my own generation. And I’ll be damned if I feel responsible to pay for what happened 300 years ago.”
Five Republicans Break Ranks With Trump on Venezuela, Cripple His Ability to Use Military in Country Again
Fiery But Mostly Peaceful Rhetoric: Huge NYC Crowd Chants That They’ll Kill Noem, ICE Agents
Minnesota ICE shooting ignites debate over federal officer immunity
Watchdog exposes taxpayer-funded teacher program for banning White applicants: ‘Likely illegal’
Thousands already applied for Minnesota’s new paid leave program open to illegal immigrants
Venezuela raid is about the oil — keeping it from Russia and China
President Trump says there won’t be a ‘second Wave of Attacks’ against Venezuela due to their ‘cooperation’
Brigitte Bardot, 1934–2025
Washington’s echo: America and Europe at a crossroads once more
A decade without David Bowie
Catholic group asks SCOTUS to block California law against revealing students’ gender identities to parents
White House says East Wing demolition was necessary due to structural issues
Trump plans to meet with Venezuela opposition leader Maria Corina Machado next week
550-pound bear finally evicted from California home after bizarre strategy ends monthlong ordeal
Naked woman allegedly assaults deputy while intoxicated, claims she was ‘trying to be a mermaid’
Grim, in the next paragraph, continues by turning to the speech Biden gave to Cleveland’s City Club in 1973, in which he gave his opinion on what he thought is “good for the Negro.”
“In 1973, during a speech at the City Club in Cleveland, Biden told an audience that the Nixon-era resurgence of Republicans in the South was a good thing,” Grim writes:
“I think the two-party system,” he said, “although my Democratic colleagues won’t like my saying this, is good for the South and good for the Negro, good for the black in the South. Other than the fact that [southern Senators] still call me boy, I think they’ve changed their mind a little bit.”
Biden’s “swaggering” style of shoot-from-the-hip first, ask questions and plan tight messaging later, Flegenheimer writes in Monday’s Times piece, is how he has always been.
Five Republicans Break Ranks With Trump on Venezuela, Cripple His Ability to Use Military in Country Again
Fiery But Mostly Peaceful Rhetoric: Huge NYC Crowd Chants That They’ll Kill Noem, ICE Agents
Minnesota ICE shooting ignites debate over federal officer immunity
Watchdog exposes taxpayer-funded teacher program for banning White applicants: ‘Likely illegal’
Thousands already applied for Minnesota’s new paid leave program open to illegal immigrants
Venezuela raid is about the oil — keeping it from Russia and China
President Trump says there won’t be a ‘second Wave of Attacks’ against Venezuela due to their ‘cooperation’
Brigitte Bardot, 1934–2025
Washington’s echo: America and Europe at a crossroads once more
A decade without David Bowie
Catholic group asks SCOTUS to block California law against revealing students’ gender identities to parents
White House says East Wing demolition was necessary due to structural issues
Trump plans to meet with Venezuela opposition leader Maria Corina Machado next week
550-pound bear finally evicted from California home after bizarre strategy ends monthlong ordeal
Naked woman allegedly assaults deputy while intoxicated, claims she was ‘trying to be a mermaid’
“Biden allies insist this run will succeed where his others failed,” Flegenheimer writes. “His discipline has improved, they say. He is now widely known and admired in the Democratic Party, affording him more latitude for slip-ups. For the first time, he enters the race as a genuine favorite, requiring no introduction.”
But there is concern, Flegenheimer writes, that Biden’s style may not be disciplined enough for Democrats badly in need of a win and against a formidable candidate himself in incumbent GOP President Donald Trump.
“Can he credibly present himself as a man in step with the times without sounding off-key or stretching the truth, as he did while gilding his 1960s-era biography?” Flegenheimer writes. “Can he win while mounting another campaign premised as much on personal characteristics — his decency, his integrity, his presumed electability — as any particular policy platform?”
Flegenheimer’s piece carries on with many other details of Biden’s 1988 bid–which ended before 1988 even came, in 1987–like how aides used to distribute prepared remarks to reporters of the then-senator’s planned speeches”with a semi-wry warning in capital letters atop the page,” which was: “Senator may stray from prepared remarks.”
Five Republicans Break Ranks With Trump on Venezuela, Cripple His Ability to Use Military in Country Again
Fiery But Mostly Peaceful Rhetoric: Huge NYC Crowd Chants That They’ll Kill Noem, ICE Agents
Minnesota ICE shooting ignites debate over federal officer immunity
Watchdog exposes taxpayer-funded teacher program for banning White applicants: ‘Likely illegal’
Thousands already applied for Minnesota’s new paid leave program open to illegal immigrants
Venezuela raid is about the oil — keeping it from Russia and China
President Trump says there won’t be a ‘second Wave of Attacks’ against Venezuela due to their ‘cooperation’
Brigitte Bardot, 1934–2025
Washington’s echo: America and Europe at a crossroads once more
A decade without David Bowie
Catholic group asks SCOTUS to block California law against revealing students’ gender identities to parents
White House says East Wing demolition was necessary due to structural issues
Trump plans to meet with Venezuela opposition leader Maria Corina Machado next week
550-pound bear finally evicted from California home after bizarre strategy ends monthlong ordeal
Naked woman allegedly assaults deputy while intoxicated, claims she was ‘trying to be a mermaid’
The question for Biden now, moving forward, is whether or not he can avoid these pitfalls and mistakes, or if his gaffe-proneness will come back to haunt him. He has already made a number of mistakes, particularly with regard to unwanted touching of women, but is still standing atop the polls facing down a weak and wide field of other candidates including a number of senators. But, for now, nobody is even close to him in the polls–as he has double digit leads over everyone else. But will it last?
Story cited here.
