House Judiciary Committee chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) wrote to President Donald Trump Friday, giving him until Friday, Dec. 6., to answer whether he and his lawyers would participate in the “impeachment inquiry.”
Nadler’s letter quotes the forthcoming report from the House Intelligence Committee, which will be written entirely by Democrats and which will recommend drafting articles of impeachment against the president. The report will state that there was “a months-long effort in which President Trump again sought foreign interference in our elections for his personal and political benefit at the expense of our national interest”; and that the president conducted “an unprecedented campaign of obstruction in an effort to prevent the Committees from obtaining documentary evidence and testimony.”
The word “again” suggests that the House Intelligence Committee will not limit its report to allegations that Trump invited Ukraine to interfere in the 2020 election, but will also state that Trump sought Russian interference in the 2016 election — even though Special Counsel Robert Mueller found there to be no evidence of such collusion.
Kamala Harris declares herself a ‘historic’ figure: ‘There will be a marble bust of me’
GOP senator pitches ‘Black Friday’ Obamacare fix that bridges Democrat, Republican demands
Judge allows DOJ to release Ghislaine Maxwell grand jury transcripts
Watch: Dem. Rep. Spins Out After Learning Trump Has Officially Restored Biden’s HHS Sec. ‘Rachel’ Levine’s Name to Richard at HHS HQ
Mamdani Chooses Felon Rapper Who Served 7 Years in Prison for Key Criminal Justice Position
House Democrat drops re-election bid after Texas redraws congressional map
GOP lawmaker unveils bill to ensure fathers shoulder 50% of pregnancy expenses
University of Oklahoma removes professor for alleged discrimination related to TA who gave Christian student 0
Unexpected Twist: Cinnabon ‘Karen’s’ Backstory Comes Out and Blows Huge Hole in Left’s ‘She’s a Hateful Bigot’ Narrative
Jasmine Crockett’s Finances Exposed – Subject to Personal Liens While She Spends $50k-100k of Taxpayer Cash on Limos, Luxury Hotels Just This Year
Murdaugh retrial hopes dim as ex-AG says Becky Hill’s guilty plea won’t sway high court
Federal judge refuses to release pro-Trump clerk convicted in 2020 election scheme
Marjorie Taylor Greene says she will vote ‘NO’ on proposed NDAA, blasts foreign aid spending
Future of Hamas hazy after devastating war and unstable peace
Man Behind App That Helps Illegals Evade ICE Now Suing Bondi, Noem, Homan After Apple Took it Down
Nadler added that Trump is being investigated for obstruction of justice, relating to actions described by Mueller in the second volume of his report, though Mueller did not recommend prosecution and Attorney General William Barr rejected obstruction charges against Trump on the merits.
The White House cooperated fully with Mueller and never exerted executive privilege over any witnesses or documents. It has resisted participating in the House “impeachment inquiry,” which it regards as illegitimate.
Nadler has invited the president and his counsel to call and question witnesses, in accordance with the House resolution authorizing the impeachment inquiry last month — though the president was not allowed to do so in the Intelligence Committee inquiry. However, Nadler and the Democratic majority on the committee can overrule requests for witnesses.
In addition, the House Rules Committee warned last month that Nadler would be allowed to limit the president’s ability to call witnesses if he does not provide witnesses and documents the committee wants.
Republicans criticized Nadler’s letter. Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC), who participated in the earlier round of closed-door hearings, said that Nadler’s letter proved that the president had previously been denied due process rights:
Kamala Harris declares herself a ‘historic’ figure: ‘There will be a marble bust of me’
GOP senator pitches ‘Black Friday’ Obamacare fix that bridges Democrat, Republican demands
Judge allows DOJ to release Ghislaine Maxwell grand jury transcripts
Watch: Dem. Rep. Spins Out After Learning Trump Has Officially Restored Biden’s HHS Sec. ‘Rachel’ Levine’s Name to Richard at HHS HQ
Mamdani Chooses Felon Rapper Who Served 7 Years in Prison for Key Criminal Justice Position
House Democrat drops re-election bid after Texas redraws congressional map
GOP lawmaker unveils bill to ensure fathers shoulder 50% of pregnancy expenses
University of Oklahoma removes professor for alleged discrimination related to TA who gave Christian student 0
Unexpected Twist: Cinnabon ‘Karen’s’ Backstory Comes Out and Blows Huge Hole in Left’s ‘She’s a Hateful Bigot’ Narrative
Jasmine Crockett’s Finances Exposed – Subject to Personal Liens While She Spends $50k-100k of Taxpayer Cash on Limos, Luxury Hotels Just This Year
Murdaugh retrial hopes dim as ex-AG says Becky Hill’s guilty plea won’t sway high court
Federal judge refuses to release pro-Trump clerk convicted in 2020 election scheme
Marjorie Taylor Greene says she will vote ‘NO’ on proposed NDAA, blasts foreign aid spending
Future of Hamas hazy after devastating war and unstable peace
Man Behind App That Helps Illegals Evade ICE Now Suing Bondi, Noem, Homan After Apple Took it Down
What this letter tacitly admits is that House Democrats basically ran an impeachment process for 2 months before giving the President any real rights.
This process is neither fair nor serious. https://t.co/1X9M3VvxZT
— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) November 29, 2019
Nadler’s letter “tacitly admits is that House Democrats basically ran an impeachment process for 2 months before giving the President any real rights,” Meadows tweeted, concluding: “This process is neither fair nor serious.”
The House Judiciary Committee is holding its first impeachment inquiry hearing on Wednesday, Dec. 4, to discuss the constitutional and legal framework for impeachment. Trump and his lawyers have been invited to participate in that inquiry as well, and have been given a deadline of Sunday, Dec. 1, at 6:00 p.m. ET to respond to the committee.
Story cited here.









