House Judiciary Committee chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) wrote to President Donald Trump Friday, giving him until Friday, Dec. 6., to answer whether he and his lawyers would participate in the “impeachment inquiry.”
Nadler’s letter quotes the forthcoming report from the House Intelligence Committee, which will be written entirely by Democrats and which will recommend drafting articles of impeachment against the president. The report will state that there was “a months-long effort in which President Trump again sought foreign interference in our elections for his personal and political benefit at the expense of our national interest”; and that the president conducted “an unprecedented campaign of obstruction in an effort to prevent the Committees from obtaining documentary evidence and testimony.”
The word “again” suggests that the House Intelligence Committee will not limit its report to allegations that Trump invited Ukraine to interfere in the 2020 election, but will also state that Trump sought Russian interference in the 2016 election — even though Special Counsel Robert Mueller found there to be no evidence of such collusion.
Armed suspect who allegedly shot at Secret Service officers near White House identified as Texas man
Panicking Virginia Democrats Now Think Their Gerrymander Will Fail in Court, Triggering Infighting: Report
RFK Jr. unveils initiative targeting ‘overuse’ of psychiatric medications, especially among children
Chicago pol says Walgreens should be charged with ‘first-degree corporate abandonment’ over closure over theft
Rich Actress’s Virtue-Signaling Met Gala Stunt Falls Flat: ‘She’s Protesting Herself and Her Friends’
FBI nabs more than 350 alleged child sex abuse offenders
Survivors recount Islamist massacres of Congolese Christians in terrorism report
Fulton County fights DOJ bid for 2020 election workers’ personal data
Hegseth shoots down Iran ‘kamikaze dolphins’ — leaves US question open
Rubio’s Trump admin juggling act grows as meme-worthy role list becomes reality
Priceless: Swalwell Joined Snapchat to Restore ‘Faith’ in ‘Democracy,’ Then Used It to Send Utterly Depraved Videos, Photos to Women – Accusations
Fed-up Justice Alito Just Leveled 5 Humiliating Insults at Justice Jackson in Withering Majority Opinion – Here’s the List
Alito rips Jackson’s ‘utterly irresponsible’ solo dissent as Supreme Court fight shakes up 2026 map
California gubernatorial hopefuls contend with back-to-back debates with finish line in sight
Climate seminars for judges face funding trail probe amid fears of outside influence on courts
Nadler added that Trump is being investigated for obstruction of justice, relating to actions described by Mueller in the second volume of his report, though Mueller did not recommend prosecution and Attorney General William Barr rejected obstruction charges against Trump on the merits.
The White House cooperated fully with Mueller and never exerted executive privilege over any witnesses or documents. It has resisted participating in the House “impeachment inquiry,” which it regards as illegitimate.
Nadler has invited the president and his counsel to call and question witnesses, in accordance with the House resolution authorizing the impeachment inquiry last month — though the president was not allowed to do so in the Intelligence Committee inquiry. However, Nadler and the Democratic majority on the committee can overrule requests for witnesses.
In addition, the House Rules Committee warned last month that Nadler would be allowed to limit the president’s ability to call witnesses if he does not provide witnesses and documents the committee wants.
Republicans criticized Nadler’s letter. Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC), who participated in the earlier round of closed-door hearings, said that Nadler’s letter proved that the president had previously been denied due process rights:
Armed suspect who allegedly shot at Secret Service officers near White House identified as Texas man
Panicking Virginia Democrats Now Think Their Gerrymander Will Fail in Court, Triggering Infighting: Report
RFK Jr. unveils initiative targeting ‘overuse’ of psychiatric medications, especially among children
Chicago pol says Walgreens should be charged with ‘first-degree corporate abandonment’ over closure over theft
Rich Actress’s Virtue-Signaling Met Gala Stunt Falls Flat: ‘She’s Protesting Herself and Her Friends’
FBI nabs more than 350 alleged child sex abuse offenders
Survivors recount Islamist massacres of Congolese Christians in terrorism report
Fulton County fights DOJ bid for 2020 election workers’ personal data
Hegseth shoots down Iran ‘kamikaze dolphins’ — leaves US question open
Rubio’s Trump admin juggling act grows as meme-worthy role list becomes reality
Priceless: Swalwell Joined Snapchat to Restore ‘Faith’ in ‘Democracy,’ Then Used It to Send Utterly Depraved Videos, Photos to Women – Accusations
Fed-up Justice Alito Just Leveled 5 Humiliating Insults at Justice Jackson in Withering Majority Opinion – Here’s the List
Alito rips Jackson’s ‘utterly irresponsible’ solo dissent as Supreme Court fight shakes up 2026 map
California gubernatorial hopefuls contend with back-to-back debates with finish line in sight
Climate seminars for judges face funding trail probe amid fears of outside influence on courts
What this letter tacitly admits is that House Democrats basically ran an impeachment process for 2 months before giving the President any real rights.
This process is neither fair nor serious. https://t.co/1X9M3VvxZT
— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) November 29, 2019
Nadler’s letter “tacitly admits is that House Democrats basically ran an impeachment process for 2 months before giving the President any real rights,” Meadows tweeted, concluding: “This process is neither fair nor serious.”
The House Judiciary Committee is holding its first impeachment inquiry hearing on Wednesday, Dec. 4, to discuss the constitutional and legal framework for impeachment. Trump and his lawyers have been invited to participate in that inquiry as well, and have been given a deadline of Sunday, Dec. 1, at 6:00 p.m. ET to respond to the committee.
Story cited here.









