House impeachment manager Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) repeatedly told the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump on Wednesday night that the House case was “proven beyond any doubt at all.”
Nadler’s odd, and repeated, claim seemed to undermine claims by Democrats that they needed to see more witnesses and documents in the trial. The House Judiciary Committee chairman played an unusually understated role in the first day of the question-and-answer session in the Senate.
Republicans have asked that if Democrats are so confident in their case — confident enough to impeach a president for only the third time in American history — then they should allow that case to stand or fall based on the evidence collected in the House, not by adding new evidence.
Biden book launch backfires as critics mock ‘autopen’ president into oblivion
Tim Walz becomes GOP punchline in sweeping new war on welfare fraud
Kamala Harris Lashes Out After Another Illegal is Killed While Allegedly Trying to Run Over ICE Agents
Dem Activist Harry Sisson Proves How Violent Leftists Are, Predicts Charlie Kirk Statue in NYC Won’t Last 10 Minutes
Montana Dem running as blue-collar smokejumper spent years lobbying for far-left groups
Trump derailed his intel chief pick’s confirmation. Now he gets another shot.
‘I Just Wanted to Go Home to Jesus’ – Kathie Lee Gifford Opens Up About Health Challenges
Todd Blanche hearing to test GOP support as Senate weighs Trump’s DOJ pick
Trump-backed Republicans aren’t courting endorsements of outgoing senators
The federal agency you’ve never heard of ripping up and replacing Chinese investments around the world
Illegal immigrant sentenced after fiery California semitruck crash killed 3
ICE officer hailed as hero after saving driver injured in Missouri crash
Bank robbery suspect allegedly steals kitten, asks employee to hold it before demanding cash
Multiple rescued from pontoon boat near Alcatraz as search continues for missing persons
Biden special counsel’s ‘runaway train’ scooped up sensitive lawmaker info: ‘Abuse of power’
Nadler added, at one point, that simply because the House Democrats had, in his view, proven their case beyond all doubt, that was not a reason to stop adding more evidence. It “doesn’t mean you shouldn’t have more proof if it comes forward,” he told the Senate.
Democrats and White House lawyers disagreed over the standard of proof. Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) told Senators they were the individual arbiters of the standard required, according to their constitutional oath.
Deputy White House Counsel Patrick Philbin disagreed, arguing that the Constitution likened impeachment to a criminal process and therefore proof beyond a reasonable doubt was required.
Story cited here.
