House impeachment manager Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) repeatedly told the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump on Wednesday night that the House case was “proven beyond any doubt at all.”
Nadler’s odd, and repeated, claim seemed to undermine claims by Democrats that they needed to see more witnesses and documents in the trial. The House Judiciary Committee chairman played an unusually understated role in the first day of the question-and-answer session in the Senate.
Republicans have asked that if Democrats are so confident in their case — confident enough to impeach a president for only the third time in American history — then they should allow that case to stand or fall based on the evidence collected in the House, not by adding new evidence.
How an Outdoor Sit Spot Can Benefit You and Your Children’s Health
Senators Issue an Ultimatum to NPR After ‘Ethical Failure’ at the Highest Levels
Democratic mayor joins Kentucky GOP lawmakers to celebrate state funding for Louisville
Watch: Potential VP Pick Says She’s Ready to Serve with Trump – ‘If That Call Came, I Would Say Yes’
Country Star Helps Clean Up Damage from Nebraska Tornado – ‘We’ll Do All We Can to Help’
New Mexico reaches record settlement with company over natural gas flaring
2 more sentenced in carjacking, kidnapping of FBI employee in South Dakota
Subway Could Shrink to Smallest Size in Years as California’s $20 Minimum Wage Does Major Damage
Ex-lawmaker George Santos offering Cameo videos with his drag queen alter ego
RFK, Jr reveals path to presidency as Biden, Trump campaigns target race ‘spoiler’
Taylor Swift’s Boyfriend Travis Kelce Gets Extension Worth Millions, Becomes Highest-Paid Tight End in NFL
Prosecutors Hit Roadblock, Forced to Hand Win to Arizona Rancher Accused of Killing Illegal Immigrant
Counter-Protesters Show Up at UCLA Encampment with Bananas – The Reason Why Is Hilarious
White House dodges questions on college administrators’ response to anti-Israel protests on campuses
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to what happens if Greene tries to oust Speaker Johnson
Nadler added, at one point, that simply because the House Democrats had, in his view, proven their case beyond all doubt, that was not a reason to stop adding more evidence. It “doesn’t mean you shouldn’t have more proof if it comes forward,” he told the Senate.
Democrats and White House lawyers disagreed over the standard of proof. Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) told Senators they were the individual arbiters of the standard required, according to their constitutional oath.
Deputy White House Counsel Patrick Philbin disagreed, arguing that the Constitution likened impeachment to a criminal process and therefore proof beyond a reasonable doubt was required.
Story cited here.
Scroll down to leave a comment:
