House impeachment manager Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) repeatedly told the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump on Wednesday night that the House case was “proven beyond any doubt at all.”
Nadler’s odd, and repeated, claim seemed to undermine claims by Democrats that they needed to see more witnesses and documents in the trial. The House Judiciary Committee chairman played an unusually understated role in the first day of the question-and-answer session in the Senate.
Republicans have asked that if Democrats are so confident in their case — confident enough to impeach a president for only the third time in American history — then they should allow that case to stand or fall based on the evidence collected in the House, not by adding new evidence.
Hakeem Jeffries doubles down on ‘maximum warfare’ rhetoric, tells critics ‘I don’t give a damn’
Illegal migrant accused of NY dumpster rape captured on Texas bus as he fled toward southern border: DA
Sun-soaked Boca Bash revelers meet badge blitz as cops flood wild floating party scene
Clip of James Carville Saying He Wants Trump ‘to Suffer’ Resurfaces Following Assassination Attempt
Karoline Leavitt Says DHS Situation Is a ‘National Emergency’ in the Wake of WHCD Shooting
Dem Senate hopefuls under scrutiny for ‘choke them out’ rhetoric after Trump attack scare
Trump admin tightens vise on student aid fraud in ‘ghost student’ crackdown
‘You Should Be Ashamed’: Trump Unleashes on CBS’ Norah O’Donnell Over Question About WHCD Gunman
Leavitt blames ‘left-wing cult of hatred’ after WHCA Dinner shooting
German chancellor says US is being ‘humiliated’ by Iran
Virginia redistricting ballot amendment faces tense questioning from state Supreme Court
Republicans rush to green light White House ballroom following third Trump assassination scare
Supreme Court hands GOP a redistricting win by striking down lower court block on Texas map
‘One-Door’ Welfare Policy Is a One-Way Street to Welfare Fraud
White House Correspondents’ Dinner Attendees Pinpoint Troubling Security Lapse: ‘We Are Lucky This Wasn’t Far Worse’
Nadler added, at one point, that simply because the House Democrats had, in his view, proven their case beyond all doubt, that was not a reason to stop adding more evidence. It “doesn’t mean you shouldn’t have more proof if it comes forward,” he told the Senate.
Democrats and White House lawyers disagreed over the standard of proof. Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) told Senators they were the individual arbiters of the standard required, according to their constitutional oath.
Deputy White House Counsel Patrick Philbin disagreed, arguing that the Constitution likened impeachment to a criminal process and therefore proof beyond a reasonable doubt was required.
Story cited here.
