House impeachment manager Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) repeatedly told the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump on Wednesday night that the House case was “proven beyond any doubt at all.”
Nadler’s odd, and repeated, claim seemed to undermine claims by Democrats that they needed to see more witnesses and documents in the trial. The House Judiciary Committee chairman played an unusually understated role in the first day of the question-and-answer session in the Senate.
Republicans have asked that if Democrats are so confident in their case — confident enough to impeach a president for only the third time in American history — then they should allow that case to stand or fall based on the evidence collected in the House, not by adding new evidence.
CNN’s Van Jones and Scott Jennings blast Mamdani’s ‘divisive’ victory speech
GOP urges Democrat governor to deploy National Guard to Charlotte as crime surges
Trump compares Dems to kamikaze pilots: ‘They’ll take down the country if they have to’
Man Yells ‘Allahu Akbar’ After Mowing Down Pedestrians in Two Different French Towns
Alert: CA Voters Pass Prop 50, Setting Up 2026 Showdown with Multiple Red States
Louisville UPS plane crash caught on CCTV footage
Video Fact Check: No, That BP Agent Wasn’t Abusing a Detainee – Look Closely and You Can See the Crippling Grab He’s Defending Against
Texas voters approve requiring judges to deny bail for certain violent felony charges
New Research Shows What May Be the ‘Future of Christianity’ as Evangelicalism Grows
Hunter survives nearly 3 weeks stranded in California wilderness after truck gets stuck
Daylight Saving reform hits wall as lawmakers blast ‘outdated practice’
Trial for ‘sandwich guy’ presents test for Jeanine Pirro following federal case setbacks
Foreign agents look to influence conservative think tanks in Trump’s Washington
DeSantis-backed Gonzalez, Democrat county commissioner Higgins head to runoff in Miami mayor race
Fox News Poll: How Spanberger won Virginia governor
Nadler added, at one point, that simply because the House Democrats had, in his view, proven their case beyond all doubt, that was not a reason to stop adding more evidence. It “doesn’t mean you shouldn’t have more proof if it comes forward,” he told the Senate.
Democrats and White House lawyers disagreed over the standard of proof. Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) told Senators they were the individual arbiters of the standard required, according to their constitutional oath.
Deputy White House Counsel Patrick Philbin disagreed, arguing that the Constitution likened impeachment to a criminal process and therefore proof beyond a reasonable doubt was required.
Story cited here.
