House impeachment manager Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) repeatedly told the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump on Wednesday night that the House case was “proven beyond any doubt at all.”
Nadler’s odd, and repeated, claim seemed to undermine claims by Democrats that they needed to see more witnesses and documents in the trial. The House Judiciary Committee chairman played an unusually understated role in the first day of the question-and-answer session in the Senate.
Republicans have asked that if Democrats are so confident in their case — confident enough to impeach a president for only the third time in American history — then they should allow that case to stand or fall based on the evidence collected in the House, not by adding new evidence.
Vance touts Trump economy gains during North Carolina tour, cites rising home purchases
Former Gettysburg mayor arrested on child sex abuse charges weeks after resignation
Breaking: Jasmine Crockett Security Officer Shot, Killed by SWAT Team
PR exec demands Senate Dems apologize for spreading ‘falsehoods’ about him during heated Noem hearing
Vance reveals $19B fraud uncovered in Minneapolis, hints California is next target
Man accused of attacking TSA officers, seriously injuring Dallas cop at airport
Trump Kennedy Center’s new leader revealed as Ric Grenell exits top role
GOP lawmakers would strip citizenship from terrorists after attacks tied to naturalized citizens
Prominent DC NeverTrumper Admits to Collaborating with Epstein in Bid to Take Down Trump
Trump says US ‘obliterated’ targets in strike on key Iranian oil hub
Judge Smacks Down Tyler Robinson’s Request to Seal Key Charlie Kirk Murder Evidence
Thousands of Marines, American Warship Head for the Middle East Amid Iran Conflict
FBI Arrests 10 Indians for Allegedly Staging Armed Robberies in Visa Fraud Scheme
New security images uncovered in Nancy Guthrie abduction case as FBI investigation continues
Virginia man charged with selling weapon used by Old Dominion university gunman
Nadler added, at one point, that simply because the House Democrats had, in his view, proven their case beyond all doubt, that was not a reason to stop adding more evidence. It “doesn’t mean you shouldn’t have more proof if it comes forward,” he told the Senate.
Democrats and White House lawyers disagreed over the standard of proof. Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) told Senators they were the individual arbiters of the standard required, according to their constitutional oath.
Deputy White House Counsel Patrick Philbin disagreed, arguing that the Constitution likened impeachment to a criminal process and therefore proof beyond a reasonable doubt was required.
Story cited here.
