House impeachment manager Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) repeatedly told the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump on Wednesday night that the House case was “proven beyond any doubt at all.”
Nadler’s odd, and repeated, claim seemed to undermine claims by Democrats that they needed to see more witnesses and documents in the trial. The House Judiciary Committee chairman played an unusually understated role in the first day of the question-and-answer session in the Senate.
Republicans have asked that if Democrats are so confident in their case — confident enough to impeach a president for only the third time in American history — then they should allow that case to stand or fall based on the evidence collected in the House, not by adding new evidence.
Trump Yanks ‘Prestigious’ Board of Peace Offer from Canada After War of Words at Davos
Venezuelan national accused of claiming control over Arizona community, threatening residents: report
Former Uvalde school officer says he doesn’t regret actions after not guilty verdict
J6 Cop Coughs Vulgar Curse to Republican Rep During Jack Smith Hearing
Liberal activist groups organize Minneapolis high schoolers to protest against ICE
Border Patrol union chief touts high morale despite clashes with agitators: ‘They are patriotic’
WATCH: Former ICE director reveals what goes into agency’s decisions on cities to target
Democrats push to blacklist ICE officers from future government jobs
NEA insider blows whistle on ‘toxic’ culture and far-left politics inside teachers union: ‘It’s a cult’
Trump Forces the Fake News to Stare at the Mugshots of Violent Illegal Criminals Caught By ICE
GOP Barely Passes DHS, ICE Funding Thanks to 7 Democrats Who Defied Their Party
Doubts abound about proposed dual citizenship ban
Maine’s bipartisan brand of political nepotism
Texas hold ’em: Greg Abbott argues he set the standard for governors and illegal immigration
Nevada judge retires after court grants protective order to attorney she was accused of stalking
Nadler added, at one point, that simply because the House Democrats had, in his view, proven their case beyond all doubt, that was not a reason to stop adding more evidence. It “doesn’t mean you shouldn’t have more proof if it comes forward,” he told the Senate.
Democrats and White House lawyers disagreed over the standard of proof. Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) told Senators they were the individual arbiters of the standard required, according to their constitutional oath.
Deputy White House Counsel Patrick Philbin disagreed, arguing that the Constitution likened impeachment to a criminal process and therefore proof beyond a reasonable doubt was required.
Story cited here.
