House impeachment manager Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) repeatedly told the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump on Wednesday night that the House case was “proven beyond any doubt at all.”
Nadler’s odd, and repeated, claim seemed to undermine claims by Democrats that they needed to see more witnesses and documents in the trial. The House Judiciary Committee chairman played an unusually understated role in the first day of the question-and-answer session in the Senate.
Republicans have asked that if Democrats are so confident in their case — confident enough to impeach a president for only the third time in American history — then they should allow that case to stand or fall based on the evidence collected in the House, not by adding new evidence.
Florida officer shot in face during service call tied to mental health dispute; suspect killed
Trump warns Honduras of ‘hell to pay’ if election count changes, presses officials to finish tally
DHS launches ‘Cyber Monday deal’ in retro 90s holiday ad: $1,000 for illegal immigrants who self-deport
CAIR spins anti-Israel narrative about Somali fraud as scrutiny grows
Drug kingpin El Chapo’s son enters plea in multibillion-dollar drug trafficking case
US escalation with Maduro halts deportation flights to Venezuela
DHS reveals Illegal alien behind fatal crash was given license by deep blue state
Mamdani taps disgraced activist who said ‘one day we can abolish police’ to key public safety committee
Noem calls for ‘full travel ban’ on countries ‘flooding’ US with immigrants after DC attack
Spec ops chief ordered deadly Caribbean strike ‘in self-defense’ with Hegseth’s sign-off, White House says
Democrats open inquiry into Patel’s use of FBI jet
USDA Puts ‘ALL’ Programs Under Review, Will Ensure Only American Citizens Receive Food Stamps
Watch: Karoline Leavitt Uses New York Times Reporter’s Past Work to Crush Latest ‘Fake News’ Story on Trump
Quadruple Murderer Kohberger Complains About Prison Bananas, Gets the Response He Deserves: ‘Deal With It’
ICE arrests two illegal immigrants convicted of ‘heinous’ crimes against children in New Jersey and Texas
Nadler added, at one point, that simply because the House Democrats had, in his view, proven their case beyond all doubt, that was not a reason to stop adding more evidence. It “doesn’t mean you shouldn’t have more proof if it comes forward,” he told the Senate.
Democrats and White House lawyers disagreed over the standard of proof. Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) told Senators they were the individual arbiters of the standard required, according to their constitutional oath.
Deputy White House Counsel Patrick Philbin disagreed, arguing that the Constitution likened impeachment to a criminal process and therefore proof beyond a reasonable doubt was required.
Story cited here.
