News Opinons Politics

House Judiciary Committee Passes Resolution on Impeachment Inquiry Rules

The House Judiciary Committee on Thursday approved a resolution which defines the scope of a potential impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump.

The party-line 24-17 vote occurred after two hours of debate between Democrats and Republicans about the so-called inquiry’s parameters.

House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) tried to clear up any misconceptions as the committee approved guidelines for impeachment hearings on President Trump. Some of Nadler’s fellow Democrats — including House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) — have stumbled over how to explain what they’re doing.



Would-Be Trump Assassin Wasn’t Only One Encountering ‘Insane’ Security Arrangement at Glitzy Dinner
Report: Biden Admin Hid Planned Parenthood Loan Discussions Using Code Word ‘Benghazi’
Universities face funding threat as lawmakers target schools with ties to adversarial nations
Inside the far left ‘breeding ground’ universities alleged WHCD called home for years
Four noncitizens charged with illegally voting in 2020, 2022 and 2024 federal elections in New Jersey
Trump teases US will be ‘taking over’ Cuba ‘almost immediately’ in Florida speech
Pentagon orders withdrawal of 5,000 U.S. troops from Germany as Trump escalates feud with Merz
Op-Ed: Now Is the Time for Republican Courage on Abortion
Federal appeals court blocks mailing of abortion pills in ruling with nationwide effect
Domino’s driver runs down customer over tip dispute, caught on camera: police
Christian School That Was Punished for Stand Against Trans Athletes in Girls’ Sports Gets the Last Laugh
57 pounds of marijuana worth $220,000 found in Maryland man and woman’s suitcase at Dulles Airport
Republican Oklahoma Senate Candidate Found Dead in His Truck
WATCH: Driver smirks in mugshot after allegedly hitting group of cyclists in caught-on-camera road rage
Oregon Man Faces Lengthy Prison Sentence After Targeting Customs and Border Protection Helicopter

“Some call this process an impeachment inquiry. Some call it an impeachment investigation. There is no legal difference between these terms, and I no longer care to argue about the nomenclature,” Nadler said as he opened the meeting. “But let me clear up any remaining doubt: The conduct under investigation poses a threat to our democracy. We have an obligation to respond to this threat. And we are doing so.”

See also  SPLC kept paying Aryan Nations operatives after bragging about bankrupting them

Republicans disagree with Nadler and they argue that the House has never voted to open an official inquiry. Rep. Doug Collins (R-GA), the top Republican on the committee, said the committee “has become a giant Instagram filter … it’s put in there to look like something, but it’s really not.”

Collins said Democrats are trying to have it both ways.

“My colleagues know very well they don’t have the votes to authorize impeachment proceedings on the House floor, but they want to impeach the president anyway,” Collins said. “So, they are pretending to initiate impeachment.”

Impeachment has divided Democrats who control the House. Democrats on Nadler’s committee, including some of the most liberal members of the House, have been eager to move forward with the process. But moderates, mostly first-term lawmakers who handed their party the majority in the 2018 election, are concerned about the committee’s drumbeat on impeachment and the attention that comes with that continued action.


Would-Be Trump Assassin Wasn’t Only One Encountering ‘Insane’ Security Arrangement at Glitzy Dinner
Report: Biden Admin Hid Planned Parenthood Loan Discussions Using Code Word ‘Benghazi’
Universities face funding threat as lawmakers target schools with ties to adversarial nations
Inside the far left ‘breeding ground’ universities alleged WHCD called home for years
Four noncitizens charged with illegally voting in 2020, 2022 and 2024 federal elections in New Jersey
Trump teases US will be ‘taking over’ Cuba ‘almost immediately’ in Florida speech
Pentagon orders withdrawal of 5,000 U.S. troops from Germany as Trump escalates feud with Merz
Op-Ed: Now Is the Time for Republican Courage on Abortion
Federal appeals court blocks mailing of abortion pills in ruling with nationwide effect
Domino’s driver runs down customer over tip dispute, caught on camera: police
Christian School That Was Punished for Stand Against Trans Athletes in Girls’ Sports Gets the Last Laugh
57 pounds of marijuana worth $220,000 found in Maryland man and woman’s suitcase at Dulles Airport
Republican Oklahoma Senate Candidate Found Dead in His Truck
WATCH: Driver smirks in mugshot after allegedly hitting group of cyclists in caught-on-camera road rage
Oregon Man Faces Lengthy Prison Sentence After Targeting Customs and Border Protection Helicopter
See also  Injured Secret Service agent fired five shots at Cole during Trump assassination attempt

With regard to impeachment, the biggest elephant in the room is House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), who has long opposed Congress taking the lead on ousting the president. Instead, Pelosi has insisted that committees continue their investigations into President Trump and his associates in search of possible wrongdoings. Earlier this week, the speaker dismissed concerns that Nadler’s recent maneuvers exhibit how she’s losing control over her caucus. “I think you should characterize it [the resolution] for what it is,” Pelosi told Fox News. “It’s a continuation of what we have been doing. You know, we all work together on these things”

Not only is Pelosi unwilling to move the ball forward on impeachment, but the speaker also believes the American people do not want to see lawmakers take up the matter at this time.

“The public isn’t there on impeachment. It’s your voice and constituency, but give me the leverage I need to make sure that we’re ready and it is as strong as it can be,” Pelosi said during a caucus-wide conference call last month.

“The equities we have to weigh are our responsibility to protect and defend the Constitution and to be unifying and not dividing. But if and when we act, people will know he gave us no choice,” she added.


Would-Be Trump Assassin Wasn’t Only One Encountering ‘Insane’ Security Arrangement at Glitzy Dinner
Report: Biden Admin Hid Planned Parenthood Loan Discussions Using Code Word ‘Benghazi’
Universities face funding threat as lawmakers target schools with ties to adversarial nations
Inside the far left ‘breeding ground’ universities alleged WHCD called home for years
Four noncitizens charged with illegally voting in 2020, 2022 and 2024 federal elections in New Jersey
Trump teases US will be ‘taking over’ Cuba ‘almost immediately’ in Florida speech
Pentagon orders withdrawal of 5,000 U.S. troops from Germany as Trump escalates feud with Merz
Op-Ed: Now Is the Time for Republican Courage on Abortion
Federal appeals court blocks mailing of abortion pills in ruling with nationwide effect
Domino’s driver runs down customer over tip dispute, caught on camera: police
Christian School That Was Punished for Stand Against Trans Athletes in Girls’ Sports Gets the Last Laugh
57 pounds of marijuana worth $220,000 found in Maryland man and woman’s suitcase at Dulles Airport
Republican Oklahoma Senate Candidate Found Dead in His Truck
WATCH: Driver smirks in mugshot after allegedly hitting group of cyclists in caught-on-camera road rage
Oregon Man Faces Lengthy Prison Sentence After Targeting Customs and Border Protection Helicopter
See also  Man charged security checkpoint and shot Secret Service agent at White House correspondents’ dinner: Trump

Meanwhile, President Trump took to Twitter following the vote to seemingly underline the political motivations behind an impeachment inquiry and quoted Rep. Al Green (D-TX), who introduced articles of impeachment in June.

““We can’t beat him, so lets impeach him!” Democrat Rep. Al Green,” the president recounted the lawmaker proposing earlier this year.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter