A defamation lawsuit against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is finally going forward, and it looks like all it took was some good old-fashioned media shaming and some of Clinton’s own words being used against her.
Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard filed the suit after Clinton accused the Hawaiian representative of being a “Russian asset” last year.
The Clinton camp at first appeared to throw its all into rejecting the lawsuit, with Secret Service agents and Clinton’s lawyer both turning away a process server attempting to deliver court documents.
After copious media coverage of Clinton’s refusal to accept the lawsuit, it appears things took a major turn Thursday.
“Today, after the media picked up this story, Ms. Clinton’s lawyer changed course and agreed to accept service,” Brian Dunne, an attorney for Gabbard, told Fox News.
Trump administration’s immigration push fuels ICE’s biggest arrest month in agency history
Citadel cadet, childhood friend gunned down in vacant Florida lot as police launch manhunt
Dem senator accuses Pentagon of murder with boat strikes targeting drug traffickers
GOP lawmaker’s gifts, ‘effusive affection’ toward young staffers detailed in explosive ethics report
Muslim Assailants Kill Church Elder, At Least 20 Other Christians, In Targeted Attacks
Breaking: Todd Blanche Nomination Poised to Succeed as Two GOP Holdouts Flip
Board of Peace demands Netanyahu cease Gaza airstrikes as Israel refuses to comply with peace plan
Denmark’s military conscription ‘expanded and strengthened’ as tensions mount with DC and Moscow
Growing Number of Conservatives Turn on DHS Sec. Markwayne Mullin Over Soft ‘Immigration Reform’ Rhetoric
FIRST ON FOX: Trump to open direct line with military families in ground-up readiness push
Outrage over noncitizens allegedly voting in elections ignites probe into Garden State Dems
To Secure AG Job, Blanche Kills off Anti-Weaponization Fund Designed to Compensate Victims of Gov’t Witch Hunts, Like Most J6ers
Nancy Guthrie ransom notes release follows Unabomber ‘precedent’ that cracked case, expert says
SEE IT: Dashcam shows Florida trooper chasing alleged street takeover suspect at 140 mph
Chris ‘Fredo’ Cuomo Tries Playing Tough Guy for Anthony Fauci, Gets Nuked By Social Media
“We would have preferred that Ms. Clinton just accept federal judicial process in the first instance, without having to be called out by the press, but in any event, Tulsi Gabbard’s lawsuit against her will now be moving forward,” Dunne said.
Gabbard, who was at a New Hampshire campaign event that day, reportedly had not heard the lawsuit was finally moving forward when she tore into Clinton.
“The latest that I’ve heard is that it’s what’s been reported, that she has refused to be served the documents related to the lawsuit,” Gabbard said. “I think this is unfortunate, you know. No one is above the law.” (Emphasis added.)
The congresswoman appeared to be using Clinton’s own words against her there.
“In America, no one is above the law,” the two-time failed Democratic presidential candidate wrote on Twitter in December.
Instead of urging others to keep herself accountable, Clinton was calling on national lawmakers to impeach President Donald Trump.
In America, no one is above the law.
Join @IndivisibleTeam at events around the country this Tuesday to demand your representatives fulfill their constitutional oaths to hold the president accountable: https://t.co/QFm6xJNbYQ
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) December 16, 2019
Trump administration’s immigration push fuels ICE’s biggest arrest month in agency history
Citadel cadet, childhood friend gunned down in vacant Florida lot as police launch manhunt
Dem senator accuses Pentagon of murder with boat strikes targeting drug traffickers
GOP lawmaker’s gifts, ‘effusive affection’ toward young staffers detailed in explosive ethics report
Muslim Assailants Kill Church Elder, At Least 20 Other Christians, In Targeted Attacks
Breaking: Todd Blanche Nomination Poised to Succeed as Two GOP Holdouts Flip
Board of Peace demands Netanyahu cease Gaza airstrikes as Israel refuses to comply with peace plan
Denmark’s military conscription ‘expanded and strengthened’ as tensions mount with DC and Moscow
Growing Number of Conservatives Turn on DHS Sec. Markwayne Mullin Over Soft ‘Immigration Reform’ Rhetoric
FIRST ON FOX: Trump to open direct line with military families in ground-up readiness push
Outrage over noncitizens allegedly voting in elections ignites probe into Garden State Dems
To Secure AG Job, Blanche Kills off Anti-Weaponization Fund Designed to Compensate Victims of Gov’t Witch Hunts, Like Most J6ers
Nancy Guthrie ransom notes release follows Unabomber ‘precedent’ that cracked case, expert says
SEE IT: Dashcam shows Florida trooper chasing alleged street takeover suspect at 140 mph
Chris ‘Fredo’ Cuomo Tries Playing Tough Guy for Anthony Fauci, Gets Nuked By Social Media
Of course, as the serving of court documents to Clinton proves, a nation ruled by laws does not allow for exceptions.
The lawsuit is seeking a whopping $50 million for Clinton’s statements, which hinted that Gabbard was a Russian plant seeking to destabilize the Democratic Party’s chances at winning the White House.
Clinton infamously made similar accusations of Russian connections after losing the 2016 election to Trump.
Now, she soon could be forced to defend her delusions of Russian agents in a court of law, something that has not gone over well for others in similar situations.
Story cited here.
