A defamation lawsuit against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is finally going forward, and it looks like all it took was some good old-fashioned media shaming and some of Clinton’s own words being used against her.
Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard filed the suit after Clinton accused the Hawaiian representative of being a “Russian asset” last year.
The Clinton camp at first appeared to throw its all into rejecting the lawsuit, with Secret Service agents and Clinton’s lawyer both turning away a process server attempting to deliver court documents.
After copious media coverage of Clinton’s refusal to accept the lawsuit, it appears things took a major turn Thursday.
“Today, after the media picked up this story, Ms. Clinton’s lawyer changed course and agreed to accept service,” Brian Dunne, an attorney for Gabbard, told Fox News.
Internet Demands Probe After Mitch McConnell’s Wife Reportedly Revealed to Have CCP Ties
Kentucky Ostrich Farm Offers Alternative for People Allergic to Red Meat After Tick Bites: ‘Similar to Steak’
Beauty school moms caught in accreditation crossfire as Trump admin weighs consequential decision
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announces distribution of more than 7 million free eggs statewide
Amy Acton cried on the job, once found ‘curled up’ on floor before COVID meeting during tenure as Ohio health official: Staffers
RNC leaves convention seat empty for Charlie Kirk one year after assassination
Lindsay Clancy juror who backed the defense also publicly cheered Karen Read’s acquittal
Florida woman accused of DUI crashes SUV into parked car, then makes bizarre plea to police caught on camera
White House stays quiet as UK leads 11 other countries with sanctions on Israeli ‘settler terrorists’
Trump Signs Orders to Block Certain Canadian Products from Being Sold in the U.S.
Anthropic Researchers Say AI Could ‘Kill All Humans’ Within Next Decade
Emergency slide sparks questions on Trump’s new Air Force One before president reveals why
‘Alien harboring’ accusations fly as DC-area county spends taxpayer funds to blunt ICE
Report: Jimmy Kimmel’s Current Season Will Be His Last at ABC
Merz accuses AfD of ‘ethnic cleansing’ agenda, postpones call with Trump after president praises party
“We would have preferred that Ms. Clinton just accept federal judicial process in the first instance, without having to be called out by the press, but in any event, Tulsi Gabbard’s lawsuit against her will now be moving forward,” Dunne said.
Gabbard, who was at a New Hampshire campaign event that day, reportedly had not heard the lawsuit was finally moving forward when she tore into Clinton.
“The latest that I’ve heard is that it’s what’s been reported, that she has refused to be served the documents related to the lawsuit,” Gabbard said. “I think this is unfortunate, you know. No one is above the law.” (Emphasis added.)
The congresswoman appeared to be using Clinton’s own words against her there.
“In America, no one is above the law,” the two-time failed Democratic presidential candidate wrote on Twitter in December.
Instead of urging others to keep herself accountable, Clinton was calling on national lawmakers to impeach President Donald Trump.
In America, no one is above the law.
Join @IndivisibleTeam at events around the country this Tuesday to demand your representatives fulfill their constitutional oaths to hold the president accountable: https://t.co/QFm6xJNbYQ
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) December 16, 2019
Internet Demands Probe After Mitch McConnell’s Wife Reportedly Revealed to Have CCP Ties
Kentucky Ostrich Farm Offers Alternative for People Allergic to Red Meat After Tick Bites: ‘Similar to Steak’
Beauty school moms caught in accreditation crossfire as Trump admin weighs consequential decision
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announces distribution of more than 7 million free eggs statewide
Amy Acton cried on the job, once found ‘curled up’ on floor before COVID meeting during tenure as Ohio health official: Staffers
RNC leaves convention seat empty for Charlie Kirk one year after assassination
Lindsay Clancy juror who backed the defense also publicly cheered Karen Read’s acquittal
Florida woman accused of DUI crashes SUV into parked car, then makes bizarre plea to police caught on camera
White House stays quiet as UK leads 11 other countries with sanctions on Israeli ‘settler terrorists’
Trump Signs Orders to Block Certain Canadian Products from Being Sold in the U.S.
Anthropic Researchers Say AI Could ‘Kill All Humans’ Within Next Decade
Emergency slide sparks questions on Trump’s new Air Force One before president reveals why
‘Alien harboring’ accusations fly as DC-area county spends taxpayer funds to blunt ICE
Report: Jimmy Kimmel’s Current Season Will Be His Last at ABC
Merz accuses AfD of ‘ethnic cleansing’ agenda, postpones call with Trump after president praises party
Of course, as the serving of court documents to Clinton proves, a nation ruled by laws does not allow for exceptions.
The lawsuit is seeking a whopping $50 million for Clinton’s statements, which hinted that Gabbard was a Russian plant seeking to destabilize the Democratic Party’s chances at winning the White House.
Clinton infamously made similar accusations of Russian connections after losing the 2016 election to Trump.
Now, she soon could be forced to defend her delusions of Russian agents in a court of law, something that has not gone over well for others in similar situations.
Story cited here.
