A defamation lawsuit against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is finally going forward, and it looks like all it took was some good old-fashioned media shaming and some of Clinton’s own words being used against her.
Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard filed the suit after Clinton accused the Hawaiian representative of being a “Russian asset” last year.
The Clinton camp at first appeared to throw its all into rejecting the lawsuit, with Secret Service agents and Clinton’s lawyer both turning away a process server attempting to deliver court documents.
After copious media coverage of Clinton’s refusal to accept the lawsuit, it appears things took a major turn Thursday.
“Today, after the media picked up this story, Ms. Clinton’s lawyer changed course and agreed to accept service,” Brian Dunne, an attorney for Gabbard, told Fox News.
Trump turns to emerging tech giant in multi-billion bid to ramp up US submarine production
Trump sparks outrage for suggesting that Iran could ‘take out’ Los Angeles and San Diego
Blue city emerges as ‘suspected hotspot’ of visa fraud as swing state lawmaker demands answers
Peter Navarro seeks Supreme Court review as Trump allies brace for Democratic subpoenas
Another Country Singer Betrays: Built Career on Decent Fans, Now Zach Bryan Trades Them for Terror Apologists
DNA testing confirms body of flight attendant who was killed and thrown from bridge
Watch: Tom Homan Leaves CBS Journalist Speechless, Frozen on Camera With Simple ICE Question He Can’t Answer
Lethal injection survivor Christa Pike’s former satanist boyfriend could be released in 5 years
NYT columnist thrashed online for suggesting Trump is to blame for alleged Cornell gang rape
Millions saved by blocking dead people payouts as Trump Treasury drops hammer on federal fraud
‘Project 1619’ Marxist Creator’s Full Degeneracy Revealed: Her Sick Response When Daughter Told Her She Wanted to Be the Best
Watch: The Priceless Moment Fetterman Accidentally Declares He’s a Lifelong Republican – So Would He Be a Good One?
Battle over Daylight Saving Time erupts as push to stop changing clocks hits Senate wall
President Trump endorses Wyoming’s secretary of state for US House of Representatives
Roger Marshall wants you to know he’s a real Kansan: Fishing, back roads, and a cabin called home
“We would have preferred that Ms. Clinton just accept federal judicial process in the first instance, without having to be called out by the press, but in any event, Tulsi Gabbard’s lawsuit against her will now be moving forward,” Dunne said.
Gabbard, who was at a New Hampshire campaign event that day, reportedly had not heard the lawsuit was finally moving forward when she tore into Clinton.
“The latest that I’ve heard is that it’s what’s been reported, that she has refused to be served the documents related to the lawsuit,” Gabbard said. “I think this is unfortunate, you know. No one is above the law.” (Emphasis added.)
The congresswoman appeared to be using Clinton’s own words against her there.
“In America, no one is above the law,” the two-time failed Democratic presidential candidate wrote on Twitter in December.
Instead of urging others to keep herself accountable, Clinton was calling on national lawmakers to impeach President Donald Trump.
In America, no one is above the law.
Join @IndivisibleTeam at events around the country this Tuesday to demand your representatives fulfill their constitutional oaths to hold the president accountable: https://t.co/QFm6xJNbYQ
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) December 16, 2019
Trump turns to emerging tech giant in multi-billion bid to ramp up US submarine production
Trump sparks outrage for suggesting that Iran could ‘take out’ Los Angeles and San Diego
Blue city emerges as ‘suspected hotspot’ of visa fraud as swing state lawmaker demands answers
Peter Navarro seeks Supreme Court review as Trump allies brace for Democratic subpoenas
Another Country Singer Betrays: Built Career on Decent Fans, Now Zach Bryan Trades Them for Terror Apologists
DNA testing confirms body of flight attendant who was killed and thrown from bridge
Watch: Tom Homan Leaves CBS Journalist Speechless, Frozen on Camera With Simple ICE Question He Can’t Answer
Lethal injection survivor Christa Pike’s former satanist boyfriend could be released in 5 years
NYT columnist thrashed online for suggesting Trump is to blame for alleged Cornell gang rape
Millions saved by blocking dead people payouts as Trump Treasury drops hammer on federal fraud
‘Project 1619’ Marxist Creator’s Full Degeneracy Revealed: Her Sick Response When Daughter Told Her She Wanted to Be the Best
Watch: The Priceless Moment Fetterman Accidentally Declares He’s a Lifelong Republican – So Would He Be a Good One?
Battle over Daylight Saving Time erupts as push to stop changing clocks hits Senate wall
President Trump endorses Wyoming’s secretary of state for US House of Representatives
Roger Marshall wants you to know he’s a real Kansan: Fishing, back roads, and a cabin called home
Of course, as the serving of court documents to Clinton proves, a nation ruled by laws does not allow for exceptions.
The lawsuit is seeking a whopping $50 million for Clinton’s statements, which hinted that Gabbard was a Russian plant seeking to destabilize the Democratic Party’s chances at winning the White House.
Clinton infamously made similar accusations of Russian connections after losing the 2016 election to Trump.
Now, she soon could be forced to defend her delusions of Russian agents in a court of law, something that has not gone over well for others in similar situations.
Story cited here.









