A defamation lawsuit against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is finally going forward, and it looks like all it took was some good old-fashioned media shaming and some of Clinton’s own words being used against her.
Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard filed the suit after Clinton accused the Hawaiian representative of being a “Russian asset” last year.
The Clinton camp at first appeared to throw its all into rejecting the lawsuit, with Secret Service agents and Clinton’s lawyer both turning away a process server attempting to deliver court documents.
After copious media coverage of Clinton’s refusal to accept the lawsuit, it appears things took a major turn Thursday.
“Today, after the media picked up this story, Ms. Clinton’s lawyer changed course and agreed to accept service,” Brian Dunne, an attorney for Gabbard, told Fox News.
Officer injured after suspect rams law enforcement vehicles during Charlotte immigration raids
Trump calls on House Republicans to vote to release Epstein files: ‘We have nothing to hide’
Trump reveals Maduro ‘would like to talk’ as military options remain on the table for Venezuela
Marco Rubio says Nicolás Maduro’s Cartel de los Soles to be designated a terrorist organization
The Speaker’s Lobby: Happy New Year as shutdown showdown draws to a close
‘RFK Legacy’ Doc Film by Oliver Stone Draws Nexus Between JFK’s and RFK’s Assassinations
US forces kill 3 narco-terrorists in Eastern Pacific lethal strike operation targeting drug networks
How Harvard’s psychological experiments may have lit fuse on Unabomber: expert
Scott Jennings Shreds Dems’ Shutdown Blame Game with Just One Question
Chicago homeowners demand answers, speak out at ‘property tax bonfire’
Houston thug charged with murder after 8 arrests shows ‘revolving door’ failures: GOP lawmaker
Op-Ed: Leftists Hailing Recent ‘Victories’ Are Delusional
Massie says Trump investigating Epstein ‘hoax’ a ‘last-ditch effort’ to stop release of files
OJ Simpson estate accepts Fred Goldman’s $58M wrongful death claim nearly 30 years later: report
Trailer Park Near Military Base Linked to Chinese Communist Party: The Base Commander Had No Clue
“We would have preferred that Ms. Clinton just accept federal judicial process in the first instance, without having to be called out by the press, but in any event, Tulsi Gabbard’s lawsuit against her will now be moving forward,” Dunne said.
Gabbard, who was at a New Hampshire campaign event that day, reportedly had not heard the lawsuit was finally moving forward when she tore into Clinton.
“The latest that I’ve heard is that it’s what’s been reported, that she has refused to be served the documents related to the lawsuit,” Gabbard said. “I think this is unfortunate, you know. No one is above the law.” (Emphasis added.)
The congresswoman appeared to be using Clinton’s own words against her there.
“In America, no one is above the law,” the two-time failed Democratic presidential candidate wrote on Twitter in December.
Instead of urging others to keep herself accountable, Clinton was calling on national lawmakers to impeach President Donald Trump.
In America, no one is above the law.
Join @IndivisibleTeam at events around the country this Tuesday to demand your representatives fulfill their constitutional oaths to hold the president accountable: https://t.co/QFm6xJNbYQ
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) December 16, 2019
Officer injured after suspect rams law enforcement vehicles during Charlotte immigration raids
Trump calls on House Republicans to vote to release Epstein files: ‘We have nothing to hide’
Trump reveals Maduro ‘would like to talk’ as military options remain on the table for Venezuela
Marco Rubio says Nicolás Maduro’s Cartel de los Soles to be designated a terrorist organization
The Speaker’s Lobby: Happy New Year as shutdown showdown draws to a close
‘RFK Legacy’ Doc Film by Oliver Stone Draws Nexus Between JFK’s and RFK’s Assassinations
US forces kill 3 narco-terrorists in Eastern Pacific lethal strike operation targeting drug networks
How Harvard’s psychological experiments may have lit fuse on Unabomber: expert
Scott Jennings Shreds Dems’ Shutdown Blame Game with Just One Question
Chicago homeowners demand answers, speak out at ‘property tax bonfire’
Houston thug charged with murder after 8 arrests shows ‘revolving door’ failures: GOP lawmaker
Op-Ed: Leftists Hailing Recent ‘Victories’ Are Delusional
Massie says Trump investigating Epstein ‘hoax’ a ‘last-ditch effort’ to stop release of files
OJ Simpson estate accepts Fred Goldman’s $58M wrongful death claim nearly 30 years later: report
Trailer Park Near Military Base Linked to Chinese Communist Party: The Base Commander Had No Clue
Of course, as the serving of court documents to Clinton proves, a nation ruled by laws does not allow for exceptions.
The lawsuit is seeking a whopping $50 million for Clinton’s statements, which hinted that Gabbard was a Russian plant seeking to destabilize the Democratic Party’s chances at winning the White House.
Clinton infamously made similar accusations of Russian connections after losing the 2016 election to Trump.
Now, she soon could be forced to defend her delusions of Russian agents in a court of law, something that has not gone over well for others in similar situations.
Story cited here.
