A defamation lawsuit against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is finally going forward, and it looks like all it took was some good old-fashioned media shaming and some of Clinton’s own words being used against her.
Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard filed the suit after Clinton accused the Hawaiian representative of being a “Russian asset” last year.
The Clinton camp at first appeared to throw its all into rejecting the lawsuit, with Secret Service agents and Clinton’s lawyer both turning away a process server attempting to deliver court documents.
After copious media coverage of Clinton’s refusal to accept the lawsuit, it appears things took a major turn Thursday.
“Today, after the media picked up this story, Ms. Clinton’s lawyer changed course and agreed to accept service,” Brian Dunne, an attorney for Gabbard, told Fox News.
Trump-Meloni spat grows over claim Italian PM ‘begged’ for photo: ‘astonished’
SEE IT: Dem senator downplays security threat of illegal immigration after White House terror plot
Gilgo Beach serial killer’s ex-wife says he ‘got what he deserved’ after he gets max sentence for 8 murders
Breaking: US Brokers Lebanon Ceasefire After Escalation Derails Peace Talks with Iran
UK’s Prime Minister Directed 13,000 Suspected Pedophiles Get Warning Letters Instead of Prosecution, According to Rape Gang Report
Republican congressman will end months-long absence from DC after missing 135 roll call votes
WATCH: Tom Hanks Painful Insult to MSNOW Interviewer Goes Viral During Obama Presidential Center Opening
Trump’s 80th Birthday Goes Off Without a Hitch, as UFC Bring Manliness, Spirit of Teddy Roosevelt Back to WH Lawn
Disgraced Murdaugh trial clerk who helped blow up murder conviction claims protection from payback lawsuit
Dem justices slap Soros-backed Philly DA with power strip in stunning decision: ‘Not reliable’
PHOTOS: Best moments from Obama’s presidential center opening
Will Dems’ targeting of California GOP-turned-Indie congressman ‘Pan’ out?
UN’s Albanese faces uphill battle with First Amendment case seeking to end sanctions against her
Interest rate cut not likely on the table, even after Iran deal and somewhat falling oil prices
US military kills three ‘narco-terrorists’ in latest lethal strike on vessel in the Eastern Pacific
“We would have preferred that Ms. Clinton just accept federal judicial process in the first instance, without having to be called out by the press, but in any event, Tulsi Gabbard’s lawsuit against her will now be moving forward,” Dunne said.
Gabbard, who was at a New Hampshire campaign event that day, reportedly had not heard the lawsuit was finally moving forward when she tore into Clinton.
“The latest that I’ve heard is that it’s what’s been reported, that she has refused to be served the documents related to the lawsuit,” Gabbard said. “I think this is unfortunate, you know. No one is above the law.” (Emphasis added.)
The congresswoman appeared to be using Clinton’s own words against her there.
“In America, no one is above the law,” the two-time failed Democratic presidential candidate wrote on Twitter in December.
Instead of urging others to keep herself accountable, Clinton was calling on national lawmakers to impeach President Donald Trump.
In America, no one is above the law.
Join @IndivisibleTeam at events around the country this Tuesday to demand your representatives fulfill their constitutional oaths to hold the president accountable: https://t.co/QFm6xJNbYQ
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) December 16, 2019
Trump-Meloni spat grows over claim Italian PM ‘begged’ for photo: ‘astonished’
SEE IT: Dem senator downplays security threat of illegal immigration after White House terror plot
Gilgo Beach serial killer’s ex-wife says he ‘got what he deserved’ after he gets max sentence for 8 murders
Breaking: US Brokers Lebanon Ceasefire After Escalation Derails Peace Talks with Iran
UK’s Prime Minister Directed 13,000 Suspected Pedophiles Get Warning Letters Instead of Prosecution, According to Rape Gang Report
Republican congressman will end months-long absence from DC after missing 135 roll call votes
WATCH: Tom Hanks Painful Insult to MSNOW Interviewer Goes Viral During Obama Presidential Center Opening
Trump’s 80th Birthday Goes Off Without a Hitch, as UFC Bring Manliness, Spirit of Teddy Roosevelt Back to WH Lawn
Disgraced Murdaugh trial clerk who helped blow up murder conviction claims protection from payback lawsuit
Dem justices slap Soros-backed Philly DA with power strip in stunning decision: ‘Not reliable’
PHOTOS: Best moments from Obama’s presidential center opening
Will Dems’ targeting of California GOP-turned-Indie congressman ‘Pan’ out?
UN’s Albanese faces uphill battle with First Amendment case seeking to end sanctions against her
Interest rate cut not likely on the table, even after Iran deal and somewhat falling oil prices
US military kills three ‘narco-terrorists’ in latest lethal strike on vessel in the Eastern Pacific
Of course, as the serving of court documents to Clinton proves, a nation ruled by laws does not allow for exceptions.
The lawsuit is seeking a whopping $50 million for Clinton’s statements, which hinted that Gabbard was a Russian plant seeking to destabilize the Democratic Party’s chances at winning the White House.
Clinton infamously made similar accusations of Russian connections after losing the 2016 election to Trump.
Now, she soon could be forced to defend her delusions of Russian agents in a court of law, something that has not gone over well for others in similar situations.
Story cited here.
