A defamation lawsuit against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is finally going forward, and it looks like all it took was some good old-fashioned media shaming and some of Clinton’s own words being used against her.
Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard filed the suit after Clinton accused the Hawaiian representative of being a “Russian asset” last year.
The Clinton camp at first appeared to throw its all into rejecting the lawsuit, with Secret Service agents and Clinton’s lawyer both turning away a process server attempting to deliver court documents.
After copious media coverage of Clinton’s refusal to accept the lawsuit, it appears things took a major turn Thursday.
“Today, after the media picked up this story, Ms. Clinton’s lawyer changed course and agreed to accept service,” Brian Dunne, an attorney for Gabbard, told Fox News.
Trump administration to offer ‘premium’ expedited visa interviews for $750
Billionare Tom Steyer ends California governor campaign after falling short in Jungle Primary
Nick Reiner, Charged with Murdering His Parents, Demands Access to $1.5 Million Inheritance
GOP Finally Defeat Democrats, Pass Bill to Fund ICE, Border Patrol for Years to Come
Trump-backed Hilton advances to California governor general election
WATCH: As Fraud Accusations Swirl, Nick Shirley Confronts ‘126 Year-Old’ Who Voted in 51 Elections, According to California Sec. of State
Fetterman refuses to defend Platner, calls him ‘baggage’ as scandals mount
ALERT: Trump Launches Strikes After Iran Downed Apache, Fulfilling His Promise to Respond
Riots consume Belfast over attempted beheading by Sudanese immigrant
Cornyn won’t campaign for Paxton in Texas Senate race against Talarico
Progressive groups launch anti-Schumer billboard campaign in Washington
UFO whistleblower pushes Vance to investigate alleged billions of federal ‘slush funds’ tied to classified programs
Jurors Were Aghast and Karmelo Anthony Wouldn’t Look as Gruesome Image of Austin Metcalf’s Punctured Heart Was Presented at Trial
Tim Walz Gets Referred to DOJ for ‘Full Criminal Investigation’
Stephen A. Smith fires back at Trump over ‘low IQ’ jab: ‘Put my IQ up against yours’
“We would have preferred that Ms. Clinton just accept federal judicial process in the first instance, without having to be called out by the press, but in any event, Tulsi Gabbard’s lawsuit against her will now be moving forward,” Dunne said.
Gabbard, who was at a New Hampshire campaign event that day, reportedly had not heard the lawsuit was finally moving forward when she tore into Clinton.
“The latest that I’ve heard is that it’s what’s been reported, that she has refused to be served the documents related to the lawsuit,” Gabbard said. “I think this is unfortunate, you know. No one is above the law.” (Emphasis added.)
The congresswoman appeared to be using Clinton’s own words against her there.
“In America, no one is above the law,” the two-time failed Democratic presidential candidate wrote on Twitter in December.
Instead of urging others to keep herself accountable, Clinton was calling on national lawmakers to impeach President Donald Trump.
In America, no one is above the law.
Join @IndivisibleTeam at events around the country this Tuesday to demand your representatives fulfill their constitutional oaths to hold the president accountable: https://t.co/QFm6xJNbYQ
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) December 16, 2019
Trump administration to offer ‘premium’ expedited visa interviews for $750
Billionare Tom Steyer ends California governor campaign after falling short in Jungle Primary
Nick Reiner, Charged with Murdering His Parents, Demands Access to $1.5 Million Inheritance
GOP Finally Defeat Democrats, Pass Bill to Fund ICE, Border Patrol for Years to Come
Trump-backed Hilton advances to California governor general election
WATCH: As Fraud Accusations Swirl, Nick Shirley Confronts ‘126 Year-Old’ Who Voted in 51 Elections, According to California Sec. of State
Fetterman refuses to defend Platner, calls him ‘baggage’ as scandals mount
ALERT: Trump Launches Strikes After Iran Downed Apache, Fulfilling His Promise to Respond
Riots consume Belfast over attempted beheading by Sudanese immigrant
Cornyn won’t campaign for Paxton in Texas Senate race against Talarico
Progressive groups launch anti-Schumer billboard campaign in Washington
UFO whistleblower pushes Vance to investigate alleged billions of federal ‘slush funds’ tied to classified programs
Jurors Were Aghast and Karmelo Anthony Wouldn’t Look as Gruesome Image of Austin Metcalf’s Punctured Heart Was Presented at Trial
Tim Walz Gets Referred to DOJ for ‘Full Criminal Investigation’
Stephen A. Smith fires back at Trump over ‘low IQ’ jab: ‘Put my IQ up against yours’
Of course, as the serving of court documents to Clinton proves, a nation ruled by laws does not allow for exceptions.
The lawsuit is seeking a whopping $50 million for Clinton’s statements, which hinted that Gabbard was a Russian plant seeking to destabilize the Democratic Party’s chances at winning the White House.
Clinton infamously made similar accusations of Russian connections after losing the 2016 election to Trump.
Now, she soon could be forced to defend her delusions of Russian agents in a court of law, something that has not gone over well for others in similar situations.
Story cited here.
