A defamation lawsuit against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is finally going forward, and it looks like all it took was some good old-fashioned media shaming and some of Clinton’s own words being used against her.
Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard filed the suit after Clinton accused the Hawaiian representative of being a “Russian asset” last year.
The Clinton camp at first appeared to throw its all into rejecting the lawsuit, with Secret Service agents and Clinton’s lawyer both turning away a process server attempting to deliver court documents.
After copious media coverage of Clinton’s refusal to accept the lawsuit, it appears things took a major turn Thursday.
“Today, after the media picked up this story, Ms. Clinton’s lawyer changed course and agreed to accept service,” Brian Dunne, an attorney for Gabbard, told Fox News.
Battle over federal courthouses erupts as GSA warns against giving judiciary more control
FL Voters Boot Cory Mills, the GOP Rep. Who Helped Keep Ilhan Omar from Being Stripped of Her Committee Assignments
The last January 6 case? Former DC police officer fighting conviction over contact with ex-Proud Boys leader
Trump urged to stop targeting fellow Republicans as GOP fights to keep majority
Biden admin released illegal immigrant accused of fatally stabbing Fairfax County mother
How one NYC suburb could decide which party controls the House
Freedom 250 Grand Prix preview: What to know if you’re attending the fastest weekend in DC
Misleading polls fuel socialist hopes that come crashing down on Election Day
CBP officers seize nearly 850 pounds of khat packed into 12 suitcases after flight from London
Alina Habba shuts down speculation she could replace Karoline Leavitt as White House press secretary
Pennsylvania State Police helicopter, small plane collide in midair, killing 1 and injuring 2 state troopers
Missouri judge hands Trump, GOP major redistricting win ahead of midterm elections
Idaho county probation officers compile ‘foreign-born list’ to hand over to ICE as critics raise alarms
Chinese national in blue state charged with illegally voting in federal election under another man’s name: DOJ
Parents seek six figures from surrogate who refused abortion after baby’s heart diagnosis: report
“We would have preferred that Ms. Clinton just accept federal judicial process in the first instance, without having to be called out by the press, but in any event, Tulsi Gabbard’s lawsuit against her will now be moving forward,” Dunne said.
Gabbard, who was at a New Hampshire campaign event that day, reportedly had not heard the lawsuit was finally moving forward when she tore into Clinton.
“The latest that I’ve heard is that it’s what’s been reported, that she has refused to be served the documents related to the lawsuit,” Gabbard said. “I think this is unfortunate, you know. No one is above the law.” (Emphasis added.)
The congresswoman appeared to be using Clinton’s own words against her there.
“In America, no one is above the law,” the two-time failed Democratic presidential candidate wrote on Twitter in December.
Instead of urging others to keep herself accountable, Clinton was calling on national lawmakers to impeach President Donald Trump.
In America, no one is above the law.
Join @IndivisibleTeam at events around the country this Tuesday to demand your representatives fulfill their constitutional oaths to hold the president accountable: https://t.co/QFm6xJNbYQ
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) December 16, 2019
Battle over federal courthouses erupts as GSA warns against giving judiciary more control
FL Voters Boot Cory Mills, the GOP Rep. Who Helped Keep Ilhan Omar from Being Stripped of Her Committee Assignments
The last January 6 case? Former DC police officer fighting conviction over contact with ex-Proud Boys leader
Trump urged to stop targeting fellow Republicans as GOP fights to keep majority
Biden admin released illegal immigrant accused of fatally stabbing Fairfax County mother
How one NYC suburb could decide which party controls the House
Freedom 250 Grand Prix preview: What to know if you’re attending the fastest weekend in DC
Misleading polls fuel socialist hopes that come crashing down on Election Day
CBP officers seize nearly 850 pounds of khat packed into 12 suitcases after flight from London
Alina Habba shuts down speculation she could replace Karoline Leavitt as White House press secretary
Pennsylvania State Police helicopter, small plane collide in midair, killing 1 and injuring 2 state troopers
Missouri judge hands Trump, GOP major redistricting win ahead of midterm elections
Idaho county probation officers compile ‘foreign-born list’ to hand over to ICE as critics raise alarms
Chinese national in blue state charged with illegally voting in federal election under another man’s name: DOJ
Parents seek six figures from surrogate who refused abortion after baby’s heart diagnosis: report
Of course, as the serving of court documents to Clinton proves, a nation ruled by laws does not allow for exceptions.
The lawsuit is seeking a whopping $50 million for Clinton’s statements, which hinted that Gabbard was a Russian plant seeking to destabilize the Democratic Party’s chances at winning the White House.
Clinton infamously made similar accusations of Russian connections after losing the 2016 election to Trump.
Now, she soon could be forced to defend her delusions of Russian agents in a court of law, something that has not gone over well for others in similar situations.
Story cited here.
