A defamation lawsuit against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is finally going forward, and it looks like all it took was some good old-fashioned media shaming and some of Clinton’s own words being used against her.
Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard filed the suit after Clinton accused the Hawaiian representative of being a “Russian asset” last year.
The Clinton camp at first appeared to throw its all into rejecting the lawsuit, with Secret Service agents and Clinton’s lawyer both turning away a process server attempting to deliver court documents.
After copious media coverage of Clinton’s refusal to accept the lawsuit, it appears things took a major turn Thursday.
“Today, after the media picked up this story, Ms. Clinton’s lawyer changed course and agreed to accept service,” Brian Dunne, an attorney for Gabbard, told Fox News.
We Didn’t Get This Angry Because Americans Changed: We Got This Angry Because Washington Did
Fox News Legal Analyst Jonathan Turley Thoroughly Dismantles Lindsay Clancy’s Attorney After Debate Challenge
Obama Operative Turned Trump Voter Exposes the Anti-Working-Class Bigotry That Destroyed the Democrats
Fox News Stars Mourn the Brutal Murder of a Beloved ‘Fan Who Became a Friend’
El-Sayed ignites firestorm after sharing 9/11 message on social media: ‘Piece of s—‘
Fox News True Crime Newsletter: Lindsay Clancy jurors, Bryan Kohberger’s legal move, Menendez brothers hearing
Firefighter caught on camera ripping pro-Palestinian agitator in Elmo costume near Ground Zero on 9/11
EXCLUSIVE: Pence group knocks Vance plan to pay stay-at-home parents up to $9K per child
Clinton, Bush received multiple warnings on bin Laden hijack plots before 9/11, declassified files show
First use of Alien Terrorist Removal Court sends Afghan woman back after Election Day ISIS plot: DOJ
Nashville Airport Authority Votes Unanimously to Change Name to Honor Dolly Parton
Watch: Convention Crowd Symbolically Anoints JD Vance for 2028 with Chant
Inside Trump’s intimate meeting with nation’s bravest soldiers during whirlwind Texas trip
California woman chased, fatally shot by illegal immigrant DoorDash driver who stalked her for months: DHS
AOC, Mamdani interaction caught on cam at 9/11 memorial sparks online fury
“We would have preferred that Ms. Clinton just accept federal judicial process in the first instance, without having to be called out by the press, but in any event, Tulsi Gabbard’s lawsuit against her will now be moving forward,” Dunne said.
Gabbard, who was at a New Hampshire campaign event that day, reportedly had not heard the lawsuit was finally moving forward when she tore into Clinton.
“The latest that I’ve heard is that it’s what’s been reported, that she has refused to be served the documents related to the lawsuit,” Gabbard said. “I think this is unfortunate, you know. No one is above the law.” (Emphasis added.)
The congresswoman appeared to be using Clinton’s own words against her there.
“In America, no one is above the law,” the two-time failed Democratic presidential candidate wrote on Twitter in December.
Instead of urging others to keep herself accountable, Clinton was calling on national lawmakers to impeach President Donald Trump.
In America, no one is above the law.
Join @IndivisibleTeam at events around the country this Tuesday to demand your representatives fulfill their constitutional oaths to hold the president accountable: https://t.co/QFm6xJNbYQ
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) December 16, 2019
We Didn’t Get This Angry Because Americans Changed: We Got This Angry Because Washington Did
Fox News Legal Analyst Jonathan Turley Thoroughly Dismantles Lindsay Clancy’s Attorney After Debate Challenge
Obama Operative Turned Trump Voter Exposes the Anti-Working-Class Bigotry That Destroyed the Democrats
Fox News Stars Mourn the Brutal Murder of a Beloved ‘Fan Who Became a Friend’
El-Sayed ignites firestorm after sharing 9/11 message on social media: ‘Piece of s—‘
Fox News True Crime Newsletter: Lindsay Clancy jurors, Bryan Kohberger’s legal move, Menendez brothers hearing
Firefighter caught on camera ripping pro-Palestinian agitator in Elmo costume near Ground Zero on 9/11
EXCLUSIVE: Pence group knocks Vance plan to pay stay-at-home parents up to $9K per child
Clinton, Bush received multiple warnings on bin Laden hijack plots before 9/11, declassified files show
First use of Alien Terrorist Removal Court sends Afghan woman back after Election Day ISIS plot: DOJ
Nashville Airport Authority Votes Unanimously to Change Name to Honor Dolly Parton
Watch: Convention Crowd Symbolically Anoints JD Vance for 2028 with Chant
Inside Trump’s intimate meeting with nation’s bravest soldiers during whirlwind Texas trip
California woman chased, fatally shot by illegal immigrant DoorDash driver who stalked her for months: DHS
AOC, Mamdani interaction caught on cam at 9/11 memorial sparks online fury
Of course, as the serving of court documents to Clinton proves, a nation ruled by laws does not allow for exceptions.
The lawsuit is seeking a whopping $50 million for Clinton’s statements, which hinted that Gabbard was a Russian plant seeking to destabilize the Democratic Party’s chances at winning the White House.
Clinton infamously made similar accusations of Russian connections after losing the 2016 election to Trump.
Now, she soon could be forced to defend her delusions of Russian agents in a court of law, something that has not gone over well for others in similar situations.
Story cited here.









