A defamation lawsuit against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is finally going forward, and it looks like all it took was some good old-fashioned media shaming and some of Clinton’s own words being used against her.
Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard filed the suit after Clinton accused the Hawaiian representative of being a “Russian asset” last year.
The Clinton camp at first appeared to throw its all into rejecting the lawsuit, with Secret Service agents and Clinton’s lawyer both turning away a process server attempting to deliver court documents.
After copious media coverage of Clinton’s refusal to accept the lawsuit, it appears things took a major turn Thursday.
“Today, after the media picked up this story, Ms. Clinton’s lawyer changed course and agreed to accept service,” Brian Dunne, an attorney for Gabbard, told Fox News.
Jack Smith withheld names from judges who greenlit GOP lawmakers’ phone records access
Trump tells Colorado governor and district attorney to ‘rot in Hell’ over Tina Peters incarceration
Germany’s Merz says Europe must ‘defend and assert’ interests amid ‘changing’ relations with US
Somali daycare in Minnesota broken into, key documents stolen in overnight burglary
Blue cities U-turn on distributing drug supplies to addicts after progressive policies fail to stem epidemic
President Trump Has a Backup Plan if the Supreme Court Strikes Down His Tariffs
Treasury targets oil traders, tankers accused of helping Maduro evade U.S. sanctions
Ex-police officer given prison time in case prosecuted under Soros DA sees conviction overturned a year later
Trump Presides Over the Largest One-Year Drop in Homicides Ever Recorded
CNN Finally Shows Up at Minneapolis Day Care, But for All the Wrong Reasons
Why the Times Square Ball Will Drop Twice This Year for the First Time Ever
San Francisco mayor quietly signs reparations fund that could lead to $5M payments per person
Boebert hits back at Trump after veto of Colorado water bill, raises retaliation concerns
Unseen Walmart video shows Bryan Kohberger acting differently after Idaho student murders
Comer, House Oversight demand answers in Minnesota fraud hearing, call on Walz to testify
“We would have preferred that Ms. Clinton just accept federal judicial process in the first instance, without having to be called out by the press, but in any event, Tulsi Gabbard’s lawsuit against her will now be moving forward,” Dunne said.
Gabbard, who was at a New Hampshire campaign event that day, reportedly had not heard the lawsuit was finally moving forward when she tore into Clinton.
“The latest that I’ve heard is that it’s what’s been reported, that she has refused to be served the documents related to the lawsuit,” Gabbard said. “I think this is unfortunate, you know. No one is above the law.” (Emphasis added.)
The congresswoman appeared to be using Clinton’s own words against her there.
“In America, no one is above the law,” the two-time failed Democratic presidential candidate wrote on Twitter in December.
Instead of urging others to keep herself accountable, Clinton was calling on national lawmakers to impeach President Donald Trump.
In America, no one is above the law.
Join @IndivisibleTeam at events around the country this Tuesday to demand your representatives fulfill their constitutional oaths to hold the president accountable: https://t.co/QFm6xJNbYQ
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) December 16, 2019
Jack Smith withheld names from judges who greenlit GOP lawmakers’ phone records access
Trump tells Colorado governor and district attorney to ‘rot in Hell’ over Tina Peters incarceration
Germany’s Merz says Europe must ‘defend and assert’ interests amid ‘changing’ relations with US
Somali daycare in Minnesota broken into, key documents stolen in overnight burglary
Blue cities U-turn on distributing drug supplies to addicts after progressive policies fail to stem epidemic
President Trump Has a Backup Plan if the Supreme Court Strikes Down His Tariffs
Treasury targets oil traders, tankers accused of helping Maduro evade U.S. sanctions
Ex-police officer given prison time in case prosecuted under Soros DA sees conviction overturned a year later
Trump Presides Over the Largest One-Year Drop in Homicides Ever Recorded
CNN Finally Shows Up at Minneapolis Day Care, But for All the Wrong Reasons
Why the Times Square Ball Will Drop Twice This Year for the First Time Ever
San Francisco mayor quietly signs reparations fund that could lead to $5M payments per person
Boebert hits back at Trump after veto of Colorado water bill, raises retaliation concerns
Unseen Walmart video shows Bryan Kohberger acting differently after Idaho student murders
Comer, House Oversight demand answers in Minnesota fraud hearing, call on Walz to testify
Of course, as the serving of court documents to Clinton proves, a nation ruled by laws does not allow for exceptions.
The lawsuit is seeking a whopping $50 million for Clinton’s statements, which hinted that Gabbard was a Russian plant seeking to destabilize the Democratic Party’s chances at winning the White House.
Clinton infamously made similar accusations of Russian connections after losing the 2016 election to Trump.
Now, she soon could be forced to defend her delusions of Russian agents in a court of law, something that has not gone over well for others in similar situations.
Story cited here.
