In an interview with Reason’s Nick Gillespie on Friday, Fox News analyst Andrew Napolitano said there was “overwhelming” evidence of impeachable actions by President Donald Trump.
Napolitano said, “The Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee have unearthed enough evidence, in my opinion, to justify about three or four articles of impeachment against the president. We have to start this conversation by underscoring the fact that impeachment is not legal, it is political. Its only Constitutional base is treason, bribery, or other hard crimes and misdemeanors.”
Republicans question Trump’s ‘privately funded’ ballroom after report points to taxpayer burden
WATCH: Unearthed video shows leftist Senate hopeful celebrating anti-fossil fuel group’s arrival in Texas
Delaware hospital shooting suspect identified, faces multiple charges including first-degree murder
Sick: PBS Bigwig Appears to Keep Job After Publicly Wishing Stroke on Trump in Deranged Birthday Message
Leftist Professor Goes Viral by Admitting the Hard Truth – Trump Has Destroyed Their Dreams and the Democratic Party Too
Judge reveals Luigi Mangione will pursue psychiatric defense in UnitedHealthcare CEO assassination case
12 Key Points on Iran Peace Deal Revealed, as Trump Says He’ll Likely Read It to Media So They Get It Right
Pentagon Sends Coast Guard to Rescue 2 Survivors After Latest Deadly Strike on Narco-Terrorists in Pacific
Oklahoma Democrats face runoff showdown in race for deep-red Senate seat
Deadly B-52 crash puts focus on engines, controllability as investigators hunt for answers
Trump says Senate hearing on DNI nominee is cancelled until US attorney replacement confirmed
Trump DNI pick braces for Senate grilling as temporary stand-in fuels Dem pressure
5 chilling details from the alleged White House attack plot tied to UFC event
Netanyahu’s relationship with Trump becomes baggage in reelection campaign
Canadian tourism to US begins to rebound after 51st state, tariffs debacle
He contoued, “Here’s what I think the Democrats will want, Nick. Here’s what I think they will advance. One is bribery. The allegation is The technical definition of bribery is the failure to perform an official duty until a thing of value comes your way, and they will argue that the president’s failure to disperse funds that the Congress ordered be dispersed until the recipient of the funds agreed to investigate a potential political opponent is an act of bribery. That is enough, in my opinion, to make it over the threshold of impeachable offenses. I don’t think it’s enough to convict of bribery, but it’s enough to allege it for the purpose of impeachment. The second charge will be high crimes and misdemeanors — election law violation. The third crime will be obstruction of justice. The fourth will be interference with the witness, and the fifth, maybe, lying under oath.”
He added, “The evidence of his impeachable behavior at this point, in my view, is overwhelming.”
Story cited here.
