In an interview with Reason’s Nick Gillespie on Friday, Fox News analyst Andrew Napolitano said there was “overwhelming” evidence of impeachable actions by President Donald Trump.
Napolitano said, “The Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee have unearthed enough evidence, in my opinion, to justify about three or four articles of impeachment against the president. We have to start this conversation by underscoring the fact that impeachment is not legal, it is political. Its only Constitutional base is treason, bribery, or other hard crimes and misdemeanors.”
Jamaican man illegally in US arrested in Florida for sex crimes involving teenager: sheriff
Arkansas nurse charged with using dead patient’s name in attempt to purchase hundreds of oxycodone pills
55 victims in Washington, DC midair collision pulled from Potomac River as recovery operation continues
Musk’s DOGE takes aim at ‘viper’s nest’ federal agency with global footprint
Trump defends tariffs, accuses Canada of being ‘very abusive of the United States’: video
LA freeway blocked by anti-deportation protesters in response to Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigration
Busy week ahead for Trump, Cabinet picks
DNC lambasted for ‘beyond parody’ leadership vote that included singing, gender rules: ‘Can’t stop laughing’
Cops Snag Massive Number of Roosters During Bust of Cockfighting Ring
NY Dems working to keep Stefanik’s House seat vacant for months in latest scheme against Trump: assemblyman
Airplane wing strikes tug vehicle at Chicago airport, leaving driver hospitalized
Outrage After What Chinese Zookeepers Did to New Tiger Exhibit Comes to Light
Fetterman says RFK Jr confirmation ‘not a slam dunk,’ as Trump HHS nominee shores up support
New DNC vice chair previously called for ICE to be abolished
Skydiver plummets to death in Arizona, marks second parachutist death in 8 days
He contoued, “Here’s what I think the Democrats will want, Nick. Here’s what I think they will advance. One is bribery. The allegation is The technical definition of bribery is the failure to perform an official duty until a thing of value comes your way, and they will argue that the president’s failure to disperse funds that the Congress ordered be dispersed until the recipient of the funds agreed to investigate a potential political opponent is an act of bribery. That is enough, in my opinion, to make it over the threshold of impeachable offenses. I don’t think it’s enough to convict of bribery, but it’s enough to allege it for the purpose of impeachment. The second charge will be high crimes and misdemeanors — election law violation. The third crime will be obstruction of justice. The fourth will be interference with the witness, and the fifth, maybe, lying under oath.”
He added, “The evidence of his impeachable behavior at this point, in my view, is overwhelming.”
Story cited here.
