News Opinons Politics

FNC’s Napolitano: ‘Overwhelming’ Evidence to Justify 3 or 4 Articles of Impeachment Against Trump

In an interview with Reason’s Nick Gillespie on Friday, Fox News analyst Andrew Napolitano said there was “overwhelming” evidence of impeachable actions by President Donald Trump.

Napolitano said, “The Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee have unearthed enough evidence, in my opinion, to justify about three or four articles of impeachment against the president. We have to start this conversation by underscoring the fact that impeachment is not legal, it is political. Its only Constitutional base is treason, bribery, or other hard crimes and misdemeanors.”


Popular GOP Gov. Brian Kemp announces whether he’ll run for Senate in battleground Georgia
High school tennis star killed by alleged drunk driver weeks before graduation
‘Total Whackjobs’: Trump Goes Off on Democrats’ Latest Impeachment Shenanigans with Lengthy Post
‘Use a chair’: Jasmine Crockett invokes 2023 Montgomery brawl in college speech
‘I’ll Be an Eight-Year President’: Trump Addresses Whether He’ll Serve a Third Term
3 dead, 9 missing near San Diego after boat washes ashore
Trump foreign movie tariff move comes after Rob Lowe warned of ‘criminal’ costs of filming in California
Rwanda ‘in discussions’ with US to receive deported migrants: report
‘MOGE’ audit uncovers nonprofits’ ‘incredibly wasteful’ spending of taxpayer funds: state official
Ex-Obama Aide Says He ‘Had Real Concerns’ About Biden — But Was Still OK with Him Being in Charge
Animal Illness and Die-Off Rocks US Coast, Sea Animals Falling Into Seizures or Attacking Swimmers
Glendale, Arizona, shooting inside restaurant leaves 3 dead, 5 injured, police say
Foreign Government Threatens to Use $1 Trillion in US Treasury Holdings as Leverage in Trade Negotiations
EXCLUSIVE: Cornyn bringing bill to enshrine Trump EO renaming refuge after Jocelyn Nungaray into law
Real ID is about to go into effect. Here’s how it may impact voting


He contoued, “Here’s what I think the Democrats will want, Nick. Here’s what I think they will advance. One is bribery. The allegation is The technical definition of bribery is the failure to perform an official duty until a thing of value comes your way, and they will argue that the president’s failure to disperse funds that the Congress ordered be dispersed until the recipient of the funds agreed to investigate a potential political opponent is an act of bribery. That is enough, in my opinion, to make it over the threshold of impeachable offenses. I don’t think it’s enough to convict of bribery, but it’s enough to allege it for the purpose of impeachment. The second charge will be high crimes and misdemeanors — election law violation. The third crime will be obstruction of justice. The fourth will be interference with the witness, and the fifth, maybe, lying under oath.”

He added, “The evidence of his impeachable behavior at this point, in my view, is overwhelming.”

See also  National Park Week: The state of America’s outdoors

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter