In an interview with Reason’s Nick Gillespie on Friday, Fox News analyst Andrew Napolitano said there was “overwhelming” evidence of impeachable actions by President Donald Trump.
Napolitano said, “The Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee have unearthed enough evidence, in my opinion, to justify about three or four articles of impeachment against the president. We have to start this conversation by underscoring the fact that impeachment is not legal, it is political. Its only Constitutional base is treason, bribery, or other hard crimes and misdemeanors.”
Police Admit Crime Scene Mistake in Gene Hackman Death Case
Fraud: Feds So Careless They Gave $312 Million to 5,600 Kids, SSNs Didn’t Even Match Names
Trump’s union-endorsed pick confirmed by Senate to lead Labor Department
DC officials decry CR plan to strip district of funding: ‘Fiscal sabotage’
Fox News Politics Newsletter: Fed Funding Plan Faltering?
Gavin Newsom’s cozy relationship with China called out in new book
‘Eye-opening’: Congressional delegation hypes Gitmo’s readiness as deportations start ramping up
Fed-Up Bill Maher Unloads on Jasmine Crockett and Al Green as Trump Drives Dem Party to Derangement
Reporter’s Notebook: Here we go again (again)
Rep. Thomas Massie Vows to Oppose New Spending Bill, Slams Republican Colleagues for Falling ‘For the Lie’
Kansas City Chiefs fan’s father files lawsuit after 3 Missouri men found frozen in yard
Elon Musk says X is experiencing ‘massive cyberattack’
Trump vows anti-Israel activist Mahmoud Khalil was ‘first arrest of many to come’
Clarence Thomas urges Supreme Court to revisit ‘troubling’ discrimination ruling
Karoline Leavitt Shreds New York Times’ ‘Pitiful’ Report About Trump’s Cabinet and Elon Musk
He contoued, “Here’s what I think the Democrats will want, Nick. Here’s what I think they will advance. One is bribery. The allegation is The technical definition of bribery is the failure to perform an official duty until a thing of value comes your way, and they will argue that the president’s failure to disperse funds that the Congress ordered be dispersed until the recipient of the funds agreed to investigate a potential political opponent is an act of bribery. That is enough, in my opinion, to make it over the threshold of impeachable offenses. I don’t think it’s enough to convict of bribery, but it’s enough to allege it for the purpose of impeachment. The second charge will be high crimes and misdemeanors — election law violation. The third crime will be obstruction of justice. The fourth will be interference with the witness, and the fifth, maybe, lying under oath.”
He added, “The evidence of his impeachable behavior at this point, in my view, is overwhelming.”
Story cited here.
