CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
ICE Chief Calls Out CNN for ‘Willfully Endangering’ Officers with ‘Sickening’ Segment
Rep Dusty Johnson launches bid for South Dakota governor
Police reveal contents of mysterious black packages that washed up on pristine Florida beach
Multibillion-dollar healthcare fraud scheme included giving people ‘unnecessary’ skin grafts: DOJ
Senate Begins ‘Vote-a-Rama’ as Fate of the ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ Hangs in the Balance
Trump goes scorched earth on AT&T after suffering conference call woes
Former boxing coach says Kohberger never competed despite suspect’s boasts
Trump to sign order lifting sanctions on Syria
House Freedom Caucus targets Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ with concerns about budget deficit
ChatGPT Users Are Being Involuntarily Committed – What Is Going On?
Trump Administration Finds Harvard Violated Federal Law, Floats Major Punishment
DOJ charges hundreds of people in $14.6 billion healthcare fraud takedown
Salena Zito: Trump shooting sparked his ‘urgency of now’
Iranian Cleric Issues Fatwa Against Trump
Key House GOP moderate Don Bacon won’t seek re-election
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
ICE Chief Calls Out CNN for ‘Willfully Endangering’ Officers with ‘Sickening’ Segment
Rep Dusty Johnson launches bid for South Dakota governor
Police reveal contents of mysterious black packages that washed up on pristine Florida beach
Multibillion-dollar healthcare fraud scheme included giving people ‘unnecessary’ skin grafts: DOJ
Senate Begins ‘Vote-a-Rama’ as Fate of the ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ Hangs in the Balance
Trump goes scorched earth on AT&T after suffering conference call woes
Former boxing coach says Kohberger never competed despite suspect’s boasts
Trump to sign order lifting sanctions on Syria
House Freedom Caucus targets Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ with concerns about budget deficit
ChatGPT Users Are Being Involuntarily Committed – What Is Going On?
Trump Administration Finds Harvard Violated Federal Law, Floats Major Punishment
DOJ charges hundreds of people in $14.6 billion healthcare fraud takedown
Salena Zito: Trump shooting sparked his ‘urgency of now’
Iranian Cleric Issues Fatwa Against Trump
Key House GOP moderate Don Bacon won’t seek re-election
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
