CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Mike Rowe unleashes on Jimmy Kimmel’s latest ‘tone-deaf’ takedown targeting everyday Americans
Supreme Court declines to hear ‘Tiger King’ Joe Exotic’s challenge after murder-for-hire conviction
Inmate Tries Handing Over ‘Wad’ of Counterfeit Cash to Judge for Paying Bond
Here Are the IRS Scams You May Face This Tax Season
Iran vows enemies won’t escape without a ‘lesson’ amid warning of ‘major world war’ and more top headlines
Communists, Democrats use #NoKings rally to call for May Day strike: ‘Shut it down’
Manufacturing has struggled since ‘Liberation Day’
Insurgent Virginia Democrat says his party is ‘completely wrong’ on gun rights and gerrymandering
Democratic lawmakers took cash from infamous ‘domestic terrorist’ Bill Ayers
Dem senator warns deportation could let Virginia woman’s illegal immigrant killer ‘escape accountability’
Trump claims donor funded White House ballroom includes hidden build below with security focus
Trump dominates CPAC poll as conservatives rally behind agenda, back Iran action
CNN Host Point Blank Asks Hakeem Jeffries If Shutdown Is Purely A Negotiating Tactic
Jaguar Makes Major Marketing Pivot After Woke Ad Disaster
Christian Father May Be Executed by Islamic Country
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Mike Rowe unleashes on Jimmy Kimmel’s latest ‘tone-deaf’ takedown targeting everyday Americans
Supreme Court declines to hear ‘Tiger King’ Joe Exotic’s challenge after murder-for-hire conviction
Inmate Tries Handing Over ‘Wad’ of Counterfeit Cash to Judge for Paying Bond
Here Are the IRS Scams You May Face This Tax Season
Iran vows enemies won’t escape without a ‘lesson’ amid warning of ‘major world war’ and more top headlines
Communists, Democrats use #NoKings rally to call for May Day strike: ‘Shut it down’
Manufacturing has struggled since ‘Liberation Day’
Insurgent Virginia Democrat says his party is ‘completely wrong’ on gun rights and gerrymandering
Democratic lawmakers took cash from infamous ‘domestic terrorist’ Bill Ayers
Dem senator warns deportation could let Virginia woman’s illegal immigrant killer ‘escape accountability’
Trump claims donor funded White House ballroom includes hidden build below with security focus
Trump dominates CPAC poll as conservatives rally behind agenda, back Iran action
CNN Host Point Blank Asks Hakeem Jeffries If Shutdown Is Purely A Negotiating Tactic
Jaguar Makes Major Marketing Pivot After Woke Ad Disaster
Christian Father May Be Executed by Islamic Country
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
