CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Fox News Poll: Maine Senate race is tight, with concerns about both candidates
House backs Massie’s push to release taxpayer-funded sexual harassment settlement records
California couple says moving company doubled their price and is now holding belongings ‘for ransom’: report
USPS worker arrested after alleged mass shooting threat against Texas Pride event, FBI says
Beloved Star, Outspoken Christian Kelsey Grammer Mulling Run for Office
JD Vance Explains How Leftist Motto Is ‘a Disgusting Butchering of the Nicene Creed’
Five countries in Latin America have elected pro-Trump governments since his election
Bar complaint accuses Biden-appointed district judge of dishonesty during DOJ tenure
Lawmakers press Eli Lilly for China drug trials tied to military-linked hospitals
Dems join Republicans to crush Tlaib’s war powers resolution in lopsided House vote
Trump Floats Plan to ‘Reverse Birthright Citizenship’ in Spite of the Supreme Court
MKUltra hearing turns into intense grilling of NIH researcher about the origins of COVID-19
NPR Retracts Bombshell Story About Supreme Court Justice Retiring
Shock poll: Talarico ties Paxton in Texas Senate race, threatening GOP stronghold
GOP infighting over Trump’s voter ID bill erupts as top senator calls strategy ‘fantasy’
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Fox News Poll: Maine Senate race is tight, with concerns about both candidates
House backs Massie’s push to release taxpayer-funded sexual harassment settlement records
California couple says moving company doubled their price and is now holding belongings ‘for ransom’: report
USPS worker arrested after alleged mass shooting threat against Texas Pride event, FBI says
Beloved Star, Outspoken Christian Kelsey Grammer Mulling Run for Office
JD Vance Explains How Leftist Motto Is ‘a Disgusting Butchering of the Nicene Creed’
Five countries in Latin America have elected pro-Trump governments since his election
Bar complaint accuses Biden-appointed district judge of dishonesty during DOJ tenure
Lawmakers press Eli Lilly for China drug trials tied to military-linked hospitals
Dems join Republicans to crush Tlaib’s war powers resolution in lopsided House vote
Trump Floats Plan to ‘Reverse Birthright Citizenship’ in Spite of the Supreme Court
MKUltra hearing turns into intense grilling of NIH researcher about the origins of COVID-19
NPR Retracts Bombshell Story About Supreme Court Justice Retiring
Shock poll: Talarico ties Paxton in Texas Senate race, threatening GOP stronghold
GOP infighting over Trump’s voter ID bill erupts as top senator calls strategy ‘fantasy’
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
