CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Democrats reject measure targeting dark money and AIPAC at spring meeting
Mamdani ripped after conceding key campaign pledge won’t happen this year
American Husband Arrested Days After His Wife Went Missing in the Bahamas
Netanyahu confirms negotiations with Lebanon after deadliest day of Israeli strikes
Putting Iran in Perspective: Have Americans Lost the Stomach to Fight Those Who Want Us Dead?
House Dem leaders open door to 25th Amendment after rank-and-file push for Trump’s removal
Rutte jokes about calling Trump ‘daddy’ rather than commenting on future of NATO
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche seeks death penalty for three MS-13 gang members
Rogue Dem bucks party on Trump war powers, calls Iran ‘47-year-old war crime’
Vulnerable Dem incumbent caught calling home state ‘stolen land’ in resurfaced video
Disney Set to Make Significant Layoffs as Fierce Competition Takes a Toll: Report
Despite Some GOP Claims, the ‘DIGNITY Act’ Is an Amnesty Bill and We’ve Got the Receipts to Prove It
Oklahoma principal shot in leg is praised for tackling school shooter: ‘He is a hero’
Philadelphia parking garage collapse leaves 1 dead, 2 missing
DC’s bid to block Trump’s National Guard deployment hits basic legal snag: Can’t sue itself
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Democrats reject measure targeting dark money and AIPAC at spring meeting
Mamdani ripped after conceding key campaign pledge won’t happen this year
American Husband Arrested Days After His Wife Went Missing in the Bahamas
Netanyahu confirms negotiations with Lebanon after deadliest day of Israeli strikes
Putting Iran in Perspective: Have Americans Lost the Stomach to Fight Those Who Want Us Dead?
House Dem leaders open door to 25th Amendment after rank-and-file push for Trump’s removal
Rutte jokes about calling Trump ‘daddy’ rather than commenting on future of NATO
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche seeks death penalty for three MS-13 gang members
Rogue Dem bucks party on Trump war powers, calls Iran ‘47-year-old war crime’
Vulnerable Dem incumbent caught calling home state ‘stolen land’ in resurfaced video
Disney Set to Make Significant Layoffs as Fierce Competition Takes a Toll: Report
Despite Some GOP Claims, the ‘DIGNITY Act’ Is an Amnesty Bill and We’ve Got the Receipts to Prove It
Oklahoma principal shot in leg is praised for tackling school shooter: ‘He is a hero’
Philadelphia parking garage collapse leaves 1 dead, 2 missing
DC’s bid to block Trump’s National Guard deployment hits basic legal snag: Can’t sue itself
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
