CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Kansas Republicans buck Trump over threat to blacklist Canadian jets
House Oversight Committee Calls Out LA Mayor Karen Bass After She Dodges Testifying at Hearing
Popular Egyptian TV Host Sentenced to Death by Hanging in Drug Trafficking Case
Major blue state hospital pulls plug on controversial child transgender treatments after DOJ intervention
Reporter’s Notebook: Dem rebels expose cracks in Jeffries’ House leadership
Socialist Convention Panelists Declare Fitness ‘Body Fascism,’ Claim Capitalism is ‘Genociding Fat People’
DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin Announces Symbolic Change to Official Agency Seal
EXCLUSIVE: Newsom says Democrats ‘stopped showing up’ as California governor makes his case to the South
Eiffel Tower reopens following staff strike over female workers removed during Hindu leaders’ visit
Dem city bashed for policy ‘encouraging criminal illegal aliens’ as rap sheets revealed: ‘Lives on the line’
Bryan Kohberger’s bid to oust judge and undo guilty plea moves forward with new court date set
Third Burning Man festivalgoer dies during final days of annual Nevada desert gathering
Indonesian Pastor Arrested on Claims of ‘Blasphemy’ Against Islam
Lindsay Clancy’s Attorney Requests Pardon from Trump
Mamdani to release documents on 9/11 health impacts before 25th anniversary
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Kansas Republicans buck Trump over threat to blacklist Canadian jets
House Oversight Committee Calls Out LA Mayor Karen Bass After She Dodges Testifying at Hearing
Popular Egyptian TV Host Sentenced to Death by Hanging in Drug Trafficking Case
Major blue state hospital pulls plug on controversial child transgender treatments after DOJ intervention
Reporter’s Notebook: Dem rebels expose cracks in Jeffries’ House leadership
Socialist Convention Panelists Declare Fitness ‘Body Fascism,’ Claim Capitalism is ‘Genociding Fat People’
DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin Announces Symbolic Change to Official Agency Seal
EXCLUSIVE: Newsom says Democrats ‘stopped showing up’ as California governor makes his case to the South
Eiffel Tower reopens following staff strike over female workers removed during Hindu leaders’ visit
Dem city bashed for policy ‘encouraging criminal illegal aliens’ as rap sheets revealed: ‘Lives on the line’
Bryan Kohberger’s bid to oust judge and undo guilty plea moves forward with new court date set
Third Burning Man festivalgoer dies during final days of annual Nevada desert gathering
Indonesian Pastor Arrested on Claims of ‘Blasphemy’ Against Islam
Lindsay Clancy’s Attorney Requests Pardon from Trump
Mamdani to release documents on 9/11 health impacts before 25th anniversary
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
