CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Florida Man Pleads Guilty in $500,000,000 COVID Test Fraud Scheme
Map Exposes Flocks Surprisingly Massive Network of 300K Surveillance Cameras – They’re Trying to Scrub it
Florida TikTok creator lands in jail after allegedly turning women’s private data into posts
Celebrity Chef Responds to the Left’s Racist ‘Uncle Tom’ Backlash to Him Cooking with RFK JR: ‘I Don’t Give a…’
Hospitals Used AI to Inflate Medical Bills by Nearly $1,000,000,000: Report
Cruz-Vance rivalry heats up as Texas senator suggests VP is ‘feeling insecure’
Tech powerhouse’s regulatory push bears similarities to a notorious Washington strategy
Rahm Emanuel urges Dems not to impeach Trump if they win the House
Terror cells inside foreign airlines ‘certainly a possibility,’ retired pilot warns
Neighborhood backlash collides with America’s tech arms race — but is this the plan to fix it?
One southern state’s rise is making it America’s new ‘economic center of gravity’
Jane Doe lawyer rips Trump’s ‘fair shake’ remark in Cornell rape case: ‘Just wrong’
Latino voters swing back to Democrats ahead of midterm elections: poll
WATCH: Dem senators dodge backing Kamala Harris in potential 2028 run: ‘Very messy’
Dem Policy Would Make Ralphie Get a Background Check for His Red Ryder BB Gun
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Florida Man Pleads Guilty in $500,000,000 COVID Test Fraud Scheme
Map Exposes Flocks Surprisingly Massive Network of 300K Surveillance Cameras – They’re Trying to Scrub it
Florida TikTok creator lands in jail after allegedly turning women’s private data into posts
Celebrity Chef Responds to the Left’s Racist ‘Uncle Tom’ Backlash to Him Cooking with RFK JR: ‘I Don’t Give a…’
Hospitals Used AI to Inflate Medical Bills by Nearly $1,000,000,000: Report
Cruz-Vance rivalry heats up as Texas senator suggests VP is ‘feeling insecure’
Tech powerhouse’s regulatory push bears similarities to a notorious Washington strategy
Rahm Emanuel urges Dems not to impeach Trump if they win the House
Terror cells inside foreign airlines ‘certainly a possibility,’ retired pilot warns
Neighborhood backlash collides with America’s tech arms race — but is this the plan to fix it?
One southern state’s rise is making it America’s new ‘economic center of gravity’
Jane Doe lawyer rips Trump’s ‘fair shake’ remark in Cornell rape case: ‘Just wrong’
Latino voters swing back to Democrats ahead of midterm elections: poll
WATCH: Dem senators dodge backing Kamala Harris in potential 2028 run: ‘Very messy’
Dem Policy Would Make Ralphie Get a Background Check for His Red Ryder BB Gun
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
