CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
FBI Reportedly Concludes All Nancy Guthrie Ransom Messages Were Fake
54-Year-Old Defends Himself From Three Masked Thugs on Chicago Bus, Leaves Them Nursing Stab Wounds
WATCH: Controversial SCOTUS decision strikes a divide among lawmakers
Appeals court blocks Trump admin from holding migrants without bond for over 90 days
Judge blocks Philadelphia law targeting masked federal officers
The Democratic socialists are no longer on the fringe
BREAKING: Protester Sets Himself on Fire Outside UN Building in NYC
Massachusetts city imposes curfew ahead of historic World Cup match
Fitness influencer pleads guilty in violent gym attack after beating man with weightlifting belt
Driver charged with manslaughter after Tesla crashes into Texas home, kills grandmother
One Day After Cancelling July 4 Fireworks, Buffalo, NY, Celebrates Somali Independence Day
‘Young Washington’ Delivers Revolutionary Hit for Angel Studios Honoring America’s 250th Birthday
Enter the Downwardly Mobile Anti-Hero Politicians
Iran Halts Negotiations for Days-Long Khamenei Spectacle
Op-Ed: America Is In the Bible – Here’s Why Millions Believe It
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
FBI Reportedly Concludes All Nancy Guthrie Ransom Messages Were Fake
54-Year-Old Defends Himself From Three Masked Thugs on Chicago Bus, Leaves Them Nursing Stab Wounds
WATCH: Controversial SCOTUS decision strikes a divide among lawmakers
Appeals court blocks Trump admin from holding migrants without bond for over 90 days
Judge blocks Philadelphia law targeting masked federal officers
The Democratic socialists are no longer on the fringe
BREAKING: Protester Sets Himself on Fire Outside UN Building in NYC
Massachusetts city imposes curfew ahead of historic World Cup match
Fitness influencer pleads guilty in violent gym attack after beating man with weightlifting belt
Driver charged with manslaughter after Tesla crashes into Texas home, kills grandmother
One Day After Cancelling July 4 Fireworks, Buffalo, NY, Celebrates Somali Independence Day
‘Young Washington’ Delivers Revolutionary Hit for Angel Studios Honoring America’s 250th Birthday
Enter the Downwardly Mobile Anti-Hero Politicians
Iran Halts Negotiations for Days-Long Khamenei Spectacle
Op-Ed: America Is In the Bible – Here’s Why Millions Believe It
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
