CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Newsom’s California rail project now expected to cost $126B, official admits, with still no tracks laid
Israel hits South Pars natural gas field as Trump deadline looms
Children of Illegal Aliens Linked to Attempted Bombing at U.S. Air Force Base
Martinez: Why President Trump’s War On Fraud Exposes National Scandal
Behind ‘No Kings’ St. Paul protest: $250K production machine equal to a Def Leppard concert
Lindsey Graham turns ire toward rivals at home amid Iran and DHS shutdown fallout
Iranian intelligence chief and militia commander among those killed in Israeli strikes
GOP races to pass ICE, Border Patrol funding bill as priorities pile up, divisions emerge
Why the Strait of Hormuz matters as Trump issues fresh ultimatum to Iran
Pair of Democrat lawmakers slam ‘blockade of fuel’ to Cuba, ‘economic bombing’ after visit to island
New Hampshire suspect who shot officer and triggered massive manhunt killed in police gunfight
Savannah Guthrie’s Easter message reveals anguish as mom missing 63 days
Greene says Trump isn’t Christian in slamming Easter threat to reopen Strait of Hormuz
CNN Analyst Breaks Down the Numbers for Dems, Reveals Their Own Voters Can’t Stand Them
Blue States Scrambling to Circumvent SCOTUS Ruling, Save Censorship of Gender Counseling
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Newsom’s California rail project now expected to cost $126B, official admits, with still no tracks laid
Israel hits South Pars natural gas field as Trump deadline looms
Children of Illegal Aliens Linked to Attempted Bombing at U.S. Air Force Base
Martinez: Why President Trump’s War On Fraud Exposes National Scandal
Behind ‘No Kings’ St. Paul protest: $250K production machine equal to a Def Leppard concert
Lindsey Graham turns ire toward rivals at home amid Iran and DHS shutdown fallout
Iranian intelligence chief and militia commander among those killed in Israeli strikes
GOP races to pass ICE, Border Patrol funding bill as priorities pile up, divisions emerge
Why the Strait of Hormuz matters as Trump issues fresh ultimatum to Iran
Pair of Democrat lawmakers slam ‘blockade of fuel’ to Cuba, ‘economic bombing’ after visit to island
New Hampshire suspect who shot officer and triggered massive manhunt killed in police gunfight
Savannah Guthrie’s Easter message reveals anguish as mom missing 63 days
Greene says Trump isn’t Christian in slamming Easter threat to reopen Strait of Hormuz
CNN Analyst Breaks Down the Numbers for Dems, Reveals Their Own Voters Can’t Stand Them
Blue States Scrambling to Circumvent SCOTUS Ruling, Save Censorship of Gender Counseling
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
