CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Trump indicates support for Christian-backed plan to help Canadian Jews escape antisemitism
Massive AI boom puts one of America’s oldest manufacturers on path to double in size, CEO says
Record High Americans Smoke Marijuana While Record Low Smoke Cigarettes
When DEI Becomes DIE: The Tragic Case Of Jason Arday
Huckleberry Finn And the New York Times’ Censor’s Logic
Hegseth Responds to Rumored 2028 Presidential Run
Colorado city leader dies after collapsing on mountain hike: ‘Loss for our city’
Death toll rises to 38 after Russian strike on Ukrainian warehouse
Republicans tighten screws on Sherrill as noncitizen voter probe enters new phase
Dem Senate hopeful pivots on data centers as rising power costs collide with campaign
Study Links Gender Ideology And Support For Political Violence
Social media influencer pleads guilty after prank videos at Arizona Chipotle, other businesses
Turns Out AI Wrote Billionaire’s Widely-Cited Anti-Scott Bessent Op-Ed
Silicon Valley exec ignites firestorm after accusing JD Vance of bringing DEI back
West Virginia looks to AI data center boom to help eliminate state income tax
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Trump indicates support for Christian-backed plan to help Canadian Jews escape antisemitism
Massive AI boom puts one of America’s oldest manufacturers on path to double in size, CEO says
Record High Americans Smoke Marijuana While Record Low Smoke Cigarettes
When DEI Becomes DIE: The Tragic Case Of Jason Arday
Huckleberry Finn And the New York Times’ Censor’s Logic
Hegseth Responds to Rumored 2028 Presidential Run
Colorado city leader dies after collapsing on mountain hike: ‘Loss for our city’
Death toll rises to 38 after Russian strike on Ukrainian warehouse
Republicans tighten screws on Sherrill as noncitizen voter probe enters new phase
Dem Senate hopeful pivots on data centers as rising power costs collide with campaign
Study Links Gender Ideology And Support For Political Violence
Social media influencer pleads guilty after prank videos at Arizona Chipotle, other businesses
Turns Out AI Wrote Billionaire’s Widely-Cited Anti-Scott Bessent Op-Ed
Silicon Valley exec ignites firestorm after accusing JD Vance of bringing DEI back
West Virginia looks to AI data center boom to help eliminate state income tax
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
