CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
RFK Jr. health group slams Supreme Court for blocking COVID-19 censorship appeal
Ellen DeGeneres leaves US for UK following Trump victory
Star Recognizes Star: UFC Legend Honors Trump As Soon As Big Title Defense Is Over
White House confronted on friendly reception of ‘existential threat’ Trump: ‘We are now in a different place’
Gaetz’s withdrawal spotlights Trump nominees who face sexual misconduct allegations
Fox News Politics: Opening the flood Gaetz
LeBron James Quits Social Media Due to ‘Negativity’ After His Attack on Trump Supporters Failed to Help Kamala Harris Win
Weird laws in Massachusetts including a $20 fine, possible jail time for frightening a pigeon
Biden administration loosens immigration restrictions ahead of second Trump term: ‘Last-ditch effort’
Democrats advance 5 more Biden judicial nominees
‘Never Coming Back’: Ellen DeGeneres Flees America After Trump’s Victory Over Kamala Harris
Connecticut manhunt underway after suspect allegedly kills mother, infant in drive-by shooting
‘Wow’: Controversy Swarms CBS as Network Gets Accused of Hiding NFL Players’ Trump Celebration
Abandoning Ukraine is a massive defeat for the West
FBI director, Homeland Security secretary refuse to publicly testify, Senate chairman says
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
RFK Jr. health group slams Supreme Court for blocking COVID-19 censorship appeal
Ellen DeGeneres leaves US for UK following Trump victory
Star Recognizes Star: UFC Legend Honors Trump As Soon As Big Title Defense Is Over
White House confronted on friendly reception of ‘existential threat’ Trump: ‘We are now in a different place’
Gaetz’s withdrawal spotlights Trump nominees who face sexual misconduct allegations
Fox News Politics: Opening the flood Gaetz
LeBron James Quits Social Media Due to ‘Negativity’ After His Attack on Trump Supporters Failed to Help Kamala Harris Win
Weird laws in Massachusetts including a $20 fine, possible jail time for frightening a pigeon
Biden administration loosens immigration restrictions ahead of second Trump term: ‘Last-ditch effort’
Democrats advance 5 more Biden judicial nominees
‘Never Coming Back’: Ellen DeGeneres Flees America After Trump’s Victory Over Kamala Harris
Connecticut manhunt underway after suspect allegedly kills mother, infant in drive-by shooting
‘Wow’: Controversy Swarms CBS as Network Gets Accused of Hiding NFL Players’ Trump Celebration
Abandoning Ukraine is a massive defeat for the West
FBI director, Homeland Security secretary refuse to publicly testify, Senate chairman says
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
