CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
‘Disturbance’ at Georgia Prison Leaves 3 Inmates Dead, a Dozen More Injured
Trump rips congestion pricing, calls for immediate end: ‘A disaster for New York’
Minnesota sues Trump admin over sweeping immigration raids in Twin Cities
Data Is In: Homes Becoming More Affordable as Trump Admin Removes Illegal Aliens
Tyler Robinson prosecutors say Charlie Kirk shooting texts show confusion, not bias, to rebut conflict claim
Senate advances $174B package as Minnesota ICE shooting fuels DHS funding fight
Man Arrested After Attack on School Bus Seriously Injures 8-Year-Old Girl
Iran’s crown prince calls for renewed nationwide protests despite killings: ‘This is a war’
Brooks Koepka Returns to PGA Tour, Opening the Door for Other LIV Stars – But There’s an $85 Million Catch
Fox News Politics Newsletter: Trump declares himself Venezuela’s ‘acting president’
Trump announces ‘final’ 25% tariff on countries doing business with Iran regime
Former Navy SEAL convicted for trying to harm police with explosives during California ‘No Kings’ protests
Celebrities Wear Anti-ICE Pins at Golden Globes in Tribute to Renee Good
House Democrats ask judge to block Noem’s revived ICE visit rule, say DHS defied court order
Conservative legal group targets CFPB rule mandating race, sex data in home loans
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
‘Disturbance’ at Georgia Prison Leaves 3 Inmates Dead, a Dozen More Injured
Trump rips congestion pricing, calls for immediate end: ‘A disaster for New York’
Minnesota sues Trump admin over sweeping immigration raids in Twin Cities
Data Is In: Homes Becoming More Affordable as Trump Admin Removes Illegal Aliens
Tyler Robinson prosecutors say Charlie Kirk shooting texts show confusion, not bias, to rebut conflict claim
Senate advances $174B package as Minnesota ICE shooting fuels DHS funding fight
Man Arrested After Attack on School Bus Seriously Injures 8-Year-Old Girl
Iran’s crown prince calls for renewed nationwide protests despite killings: ‘This is a war’
Brooks Koepka Returns to PGA Tour, Opening the Door for Other LIV Stars – But There’s an $85 Million Catch
Fox News Politics Newsletter: Trump declares himself Venezuela’s ‘acting president’
Trump announces ‘final’ 25% tariff on countries doing business with Iran regime
Former Navy SEAL convicted for trying to harm police with explosives during California ‘No Kings’ protests
Celebrities Wear Anti-ICE Pins at Golden Globes in Tribute to Renee Good
House Democrats ask judge to block Noem’s revived ICE visit rule, say DHS defied court order
Conservative legal group targets CFPB rule mandating race, sex data in home loans
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
