CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Trump Announces Plan to Help Ranchers Going Through Beef Market ‘Hell’
Top election schemes roiling key midterm races as both parties accuse rivals of trickery
Watch: Markwayne Mullin Goes Off on Reporter Who Tried to Downplay the Danger of Illegal Alien Truckers
Democrats’ generational battle erupts as 80-year-old senator faces younger challenger
Georgia cop kills beloved pet donkey in his own pasture as heartbroken owner demands justice: ‘We miss him’
Lindsay Clancy’s future could rest with ‘prosecution doctors’ as case echoes infamous Maine killings: expert
Get right out of town
WATCH: Maryland carjacking suspect plows toward cops as they open fire
Suspected DUI driver leads cops on wild chase before dramatic takedown on popular California beach
Mamdani Locked in Unexpected War with NY Teachers Union Over Big Bonuses
Tensions erupt in House hearing as GOP advances anti-socialism resolution while Dems rage: ‘Silly season’
Who pays for US power boom? Blue, red states offer starkly different ways to lower utility bills amid AI surge
Army Secretary Dan Driscoll submits resignation to Trump
Fact check: Trump claims no autism cases among unvaccinated Amish children
Breaking: SCOTUS Gives Trump’s Ballroom Construction the Green Light
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Trump Announces Plan to Help Ranchers Going Through Beef Market ‘Hell’
Top election schemes roiling key midterm races as both parties accuse rivals of trickery
Watch: Markwayne Mullin Goes Off on Reporter Who Tried to Downplay the Danger of Illegal Alien Truckers
Democrats’ generational battle erupts as 80-year-old senator faces younger challenger
Georgia cop kills beloved pet donkey in his own pasture as heartbroken owner demands justice: ‘We miss him’
Lindsay Clancy’s future could rest with ‘prosecution doctors’ as case echoes infamous Maine killings: expert
Get right out of town
WATCH: Maryland carjacking suspect plows toward cops as they open fire
Suspected DUI driver leads cops on wild chase before dramatic takedown on popular California beach
Mamdani Locked in Unexpected War with NY Teachers Union Over Big Bonuses
Tensions erupt in House hearing as GOP advances anti-socialism resolution while Dems rage: ‘Silly season’
Who pays for US power boom? Blue, red states offer starkly different ways to lower utility bills amid AI surge
Army Secretary Dan Driscoll submits resignation to Trump
Fact check: Trump claims no autism cases among unvaccinated Amish children
Breaking: SCOTUS Gives Trump’s Ballroom Construction the Green Light
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
