CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Sweden’s left-wing coalition fails to form government, opening possibility for right wing to stay in charge
Reporter’s Notebook: Senate Republicans scrap early exit from Washington as midterm stakes soar
Blue city funds immigrant activist program with taxpayer dollars, critics say it ‘shuts citizens out’
AOC gives major hint about 2028 as Democrat civil war looms
Walz’s ‘exit interview’ reflecting on his tenure sparks lawmaker debate about his legacy: ‘Never serious’
Former Climate Reporter: My Industry Protected the Climate Change Narrative By Killing Positive News Stories
Degeneracy: School Protected Teacher Taking Sexual Pics of 10-Year-Olds Because He Is Gay and ‘Bats for the Other Team,’ Court Docs Say
Government-Owned Capitalism: Brilliant Strategy or Socialist Disaster?
Key Alaska Senate Race Comes Down to One Issue: Fish
AOC’s Ivy League warmup act leads democratic socialists in notorious anti-Israel chant
Lindsay Clancy holdout juror’s lawyer challenges claim he broke the law and more top headlines
Trump’s novel legal strategy pummels alleged ‘narco-terrorists’ and cartel members
Sen Kennedy says no living politicians should have buildings named after them after Trump’s moves
Texas man arrested after ‘intentionally’ crashing into a closed Kroger to use bathroom: cops
Attorney for lone holdout juror in Lindsay Clancy mistrial pushes back on claims of refusing the law
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Sweden’s left-wing coalition fails to form government, opening possibility for right wing to stay in charge
Reporter’s Notebook: Senate Republicans scrap early exit from Washington as midterm stakes soar
Blue city funds immigrant activist program with taxpayer dollars, critics say it ‘shuts citizens out’
AOC gives major hint about 2028 as Democrat civil war looms
Walz’s ‘exit interview’ reflecting on his tenure sparks lawmaker debate about his legacy: ‘Never serious’
Former Climate Reporter: My Industry Protected the Climate Change Narrative By Killing Positive News Stories
Degeneracy: School Protected Teacher Taking Sexual Pics of 10-Year-Olds Because He Is Gay and ‘Bats for the Other Team,’ Court Docs Say
Government-Owned Capitalism: Brilliant Strategy or Socialist Disaster?
Key Alaska Senate Race Comes Down to One Issue: Fish
AOC’s Ivy League warmup act leads democratic socialists in notorious anti-Israel chant
Lindsay Clancy holdout juror’s lawyer challenges claim he broke the law and more top headlines
Trump’s novel legal strategy pummels alleged ‘narco-terrorists’ and cartel members
Sen Kennedy says no living politicians should have buildings named after them after Trump’s moves
Texas man arrested after ‘intentionally’ crashing into a closed Kroger to use bathroom: cops
Attorney for lone holdout juror in Lindsay Clancy mistrial pushes back on claims of refusing the law
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
