CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Watch: Tokyo, Japan, Puts Blue States, Cities to Shame with July 4th Celebration
Trump grants pardons to ‘persecuted’ mechanics in right-to-repair crackdown: ‘I am setting them all free’
Police swarm Michigan shopping center after ‘significant’ shooting incident; at least 2 dead
US military deploys MTVRs, airlifts aid to Venezuela following deadly earthquakes
UPDATE: Strange Findings – DHS Investigators Release Report on Secret Service Failures at Butler Assassination Attempt
Op-Ed: Make Colombia Free Again, Bring Us Back to Our Judeo-Christian Roots
Who Should Be Held Accountable for Climate Alarmism?
Mamdani blasts ICE agents, Elon Musk and ‘supremacy’ in America 250 speech ahead of July 4 weekend
Trump DOJ Sues Gavin Newsom’s California Over Glock Ban
Where key Democrats stand on divisive Michigan Senate primary
Is AI the Remedy for Rural Healthcare?
Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce take over Madison Square Garden, shut down Midtown Manhattan
State Fair forced to close until 5pm as DC battles extreme heat
Mamdani lashes out at rich and powerful ‘turning us against one another’ during alternative America 250 speech
Trump calls out NATO ahead of summit, calling it ‘ridiculous’ for US to persist on ‘one sided path’
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Watch: Tokyo, Japan, Puts Blue States, Cities to Shame with July 4th Celebration
Trump grants pardons to ‘persecuted’ mechanics in right-to-repair crackdown: ‘I am setting them all free’
Police swarm Michigan shopping center after ‘significant’ shooting incident; at least 2 dead
US military deploys MTVRs, airlifts aid to Venezuela following deadly earthquakes
UPDATE: Strange Findings – DHS Investigators Release Report on Secret Service Failures at Butler Assassination Attempt
Op-Ed: Make Colombia Free Again, Bring Us Back to Our Judeo-Christian Roots
Who Should Be Held Accountable for Climate Alarmism?
Mamdani blasts ICE agents, Elon Musk and ‘supremacy’ in America 250 speech ahead of July 4 weekend
Trump DOJ Sues Gavin Newsom’s California Over Glock Ban
Where key Democrats stand on divisive Michigan Senate primary
Is AI the Remedy for Rural Healthcare?
Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce take over Madison Square Garden, shut down Midtown Manhattan
State Fair forced to close until 5pm as DC battles extreme heat
Mamdani lashes out at rich and powerful ‘turning us against one another’ during alternative America 250 speech
Trump calls out NATO ahead of summit, calling it ‘ridiculous’ for US to persist on ‘one sided path’
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
