CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Federal judge blocks lawmakers’ effort to force DOJ release of Epstein files
Kavanaugh warns Trump case could ‘shatter’ Federal Reserve independence in Supreme Court hearing
Watch: Scott Bessent Unleashes on Gavin Newsom at Davos, Gives Him a Painful New Nickname
CNN Panelist Issues Retraction and Apology After Going Too Far in On-Air Trump Attack
NATO chief praises Trump at Davos, says he forced Europe to ‘step up’ on defense
Vice President JD Vance to visit Minneapolis, source says, amid unrest over ICE operations
NATO Chief Tells World Leaders ‘Trump Is Right’ About Greenland
Air Force One Forced to Turn Around and Make Unscheduled Landing During Trump’s Trip to Europe
NASA astronaut who was stuck in space retires after 27-year career
Mamdani Turns Into Kamala Harris on ‘The View’ – Responds With Gibberish to Question on Aides’ Rabid Anti-White Racism
Mexico flies 37 cartel members to US under pressure from Trump admin
Trump set to meet with foreign leaders at the World Economic Forum and more top headlines
Ex-NFL reporter launches GOP Senate bid, reveals how she will flip script on state’s ‘crisis of leadership’
What will Trump’s Greenland obsession mean for the future of NATO?
Davos braces for Trump as even he admits: ‘I have no idea what’s going to happen’
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Federal judge blocks lawmakers’ effort to force DOJ release of Epstein files
Kavanaugh warns Trump case could ‘shatter’ Federal Reserve independence in Supreme Court hearing
Watch: Scott Bessent Unleashes on Gavin Newsom at Davos, Gives Him a Painful New Nickname
CNN Panelist Issues Retraction and Apology After Going Too Far in On-Air Trump Attack
NATO chief praises Trump at Davos, says he forced Europe to ‘step up’ on defense
Vice President JD Vance to visit Minneapolis, source says, amid unrest over ICE operations
NATO Chief Tells World Leaders ‘Trump Is Right’ About Greenland
Air Force One Forced to Turn Around and Make Unscheduled Landing During Trump’s Trip to Europe
NASA astronaut who was stuck in space retires after 27-year career
Mamdani Turns Into Kamala Harris on ‘The View’ – Responds With Gibberish to Question on Aides’ Rabid Anti-White Racism
Mexico flies 37 cartel members to US under pressure from Trump admin
Trump set to meet with foreign leaders at the World Economic Forum and more top headlines
Ex-NFL reporter launches GOP Senate bid, reveals how she will flip script on state’s ‘crisis of leadership’
What will Trump’s Greenland obsession mean for the future of NATO?
Davos braces for Trump as even he admits: ‘I have no idea what’s going to happen’
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
