CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Breaking: US Launches Airstrikes in Iran, Saudi Arabia Joins in as Iran Is Pushed to ‘Tipping Point’
DOJ suffers setback in New Jersey voter roll lawsuit despite illegal registrants scandal
Watch: Sen. Josh Hawley Illustrates the Absurdity of Fauci’s Hearing Stunt with 3 Questions
New Fauci Investigation Launched – Biden’s Pardon Can’t Save Him This Time
Fox News Poll: Democratic enthusiasm shapes North Carolina Senate race
Joint operation with US opens Saudi Arabia to barrage from Iran and its proxies
Fetterman brands new socialist favorite ‘Pontiac Platner’ after ‘ogre’ dig
US considers rejecting French ambassador appointment as countries feud over UN and human rights
Escaped inmate’s bid for freedom comes to crashing end after coordinated manhunt closes in
Kathy Hochul’s Re-Election Bid Suddenly Gets Uncomfortable as Surprise Poll Drops
Violent anti-ICE rioter who targeted police finally faces reckoning in federal court
Fauci’s Fifth Amendment answers may test Biden pardon as GOP eyes contempt
WATCH: Fetterman reveals his ‘one regret’ from COVID era after Fauci testimony
Senator’s F-bomb bashing of Fauci rocks Internet: ‘High-heat fastball!’
Trump announces two-year, $22 billion Dulles airport renovation
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Breaking: US Launches Airstrikes in Iran, Saudi Arabia Joins in as Iran Is Pushed to ‘Tipping Point’
DOJ suffers setback in New Jersey voter roll lawsuit despite illegal registrants scandal
Watch: Sen. Josh Hawley Illustrates the Absurdity of Fauci’s Hearing Stunt with 3 Questions
New Fauci Investigation Launched – Biden’s Pardon Can’t Save Him This Time
Fox News Poll: Democratic enthusiasm shapes North Carolina Senate race
Joint operation with US opens Saudi Arabia to barrage from Iran and its proxies
Fetterman brands new socialist favorite ‘Pontiac Platner’ after ‘ogre’ dig
US considers rejecting French ambassador appointment as countries feud over UN and human rights
Escaped inmate’s bid for freedom comes to crashing end after coordinated manhunt closes in
Kathy Hochul’s Re-Election Bid Suddenly Gets Uncomfortable as Surprise Poll Drops
Violent anti-ICE rioter who targeted police finally faces reckoning in federal court
Fauci’s Fifth Amendment answers may test Biden pardon as GOP eyes contempt
WATCH: Fetterman reveals his ‘one regret’ from COVID era after Fauci testimony
Senator’s F-bomb bashing of Fauci rocks Internet: ‘High-heat fastball!’
Trump announces two-year, $22 billion Dulles airport renovation
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
