CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Kentucky man charged with boating under the influence after female passenger, 19, goes missing
Are You Gay Enough To Get A California Utilities Contract? Here’s The Test
How a Ministry Is Spreading Christianity in Iran Using AI
Women accuse Pearadise founder of preying on them by turning ‘safe space’ into mansion of manipulation
NY governor hopeful vows showdown with Mamdani over socialist agenda: ‘I will stop him’
Firefighter brother of 9/11 victim incensed by ‘radical’ Muslims winning key Dem primaries
Trump-backed Letlow takes on John Fleming in runoff to replace Bill Cassidy
Incoming socialist DC mayor has a weak hand against Trump administration
People On Food Stamps Can Keep Buying Junk With Your Tax Dollars, Obama Judge Rules
Lawyer who beat Hawaii gun law calls state’s reliance on Black Code ‘disgraceful’
American Woman in Mexico Convicted for Drugging and Killing Men She Met on Dating Apps
Review: We’re all too old for the new ‘Toy Story’
Trump’s endorsement power faces new test in Louisiana Republican Senate showdown
Minnesota man captured in Somalia after allegedly helping orchestrate $250M child nutrition fraud scheme
New Mexico AG launches criminal investigation into DEA over allegations agents let fentanyl flood state
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Kentucky man charged with boating under the influence after female passenger, 19, goes missing
Are You Gay Enough To Get A California Utilities Contract? Here’s The Test
How a Ministry Is Spreading Christianity in Iran Using AI
Women accuse Pearadise founder of preying on them by turning ‘safe space’ into mansion of manipulation
NY governor hopeful vows showdown with Mamdani over socialist agenda: ‘I will stop him’
Firefighter brother of 9/11 victim incensed by ‘radical’ Muslims winning key Dem primaries
Trump-backed Letlow takes on John Fleming in runoff to replace Bill Cassidy
Incoming socialist DC mayor has a weak hand against Trump administration
People On Food Stamps Can Keep Buying Junk With Your Tax Dollars, Obama Judge Rules
Lawyer who beat Hawaii gun law calls state’s reliance on Black Code ‘disgraceful’
American Woman in Mexico Convicted for Drugging and Killing Men She Met on Dating Apps
Review: We’re all too old for the new ‘Toy Story’
Trump’s endorsement power faces new test in Louisiana Republican Senate showdown
Minnesota man captured in Somalia after allegedly helping orchestrate $250M child nutrition fraud scheme
New Mexico AG launches criminal investigation into DEA over allegations agents let fentanyl flood state
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
