CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Dem handlers lash out when Ramaswamy staffer confronts their boss about debate: ‘No pictures’
Blue state governor’s pardon of convicted felon torpedos a major Supreme Court immigration fight
This Couple Trapped Children in a Trailer for Years: Now Florida Is Seeking the Death Penalty
Abdul El-Sayed touts ‘whole a–’ medical credentials while defending sex changes for children
God Took Me from Deformity, a Basement, and Agoraphobia to the Atlanta Hawks Locker Room
Any ‘Iran Deal’ Must Include Justice for American Victims of State-Sponsored Terrorism
Liberal Donors, Corporate Interests Conspire to Help Left-Leaning Republicans in Deep Red Wyoming
White House unloads on violent ‘criminal alien’ nabbed after investigators uncover election offense
NBC beefs up security at ‘Today’ studio after Nancy Guthrie kidnapping, intruder incident
What does ‘Never Forget’ mean for a generation with no memory of 9/11?
If the US cuts funding to Israel, could Jordan and Egypt be next?
Have the Left and Right switched places on globalization and consumerism?
PBS’s ‘Marble Hall Murders’ features lovely locales, artful acting, and transfixing twists
Trump says he would ‘love’ to see Ireland unified as one nation
New York City Council pushes bill to take press passes away from ‘Mangionistas’
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Dem handlers lash out when Ramaswamy staffer confronts their boss about debate: ‘No pictures’
Blue state governor’s pardon of convicted felon torpedos a major Supreme Court immigration fight
This Couple Trapped Children in a Trailer for Years: Now Florida Is Seeking the Death Penalty
Abdul El-Sayed touts ‘whole a–’ medical credentials while defending sex changes for children
God Took Me from Deformity, a Basement, and Agoraphobia to the Atlanta Hawks Locker Room
Any ‘Iran Deal’ Must Include Justice for American Victims of State-Sponsored Terrorism
Liberal Donors, Corporate Interests Conspire to Help Left-Leaning Republicans in Deep Red Wyoming
White House unloads on violent ‘criminal alien’ nabbed after investigators uncover election offense
NBC beefs up security at ‘Today’ studio after Nancy Guthrie kidnapping, intruder incident
What does ‘Never Forget’ mean for a generation with no memory of 9/11?
If the US cuts funding to Israel, could Jordan and Egypt be next?
Have the Left and Right switched places on globalization and consumerism?
PBS’s ‘Marble Hall Murders’ features lovely locales, artful acting, and transfixing twists
Trump says he would ‘love’ to see Ireland unified as one nation
New York City Council pushes bill to take press passes away from ‘Mangionistas’
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
