CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Trump commission unveils 12-point blueprint to expand US religious liberty protections
Watch: JD Vance Has Hilarious ‘Note to Protesters’ Yelling at Him in a Foreign Language
DHS Delivers Bad News for 300,000 Haitians in the US: ‘It’s Closing Time’
New York City pours $15M into sex change initiatives as Mamdani accuses federal government of intimidation
Socialists sweep NYC as Americans balk at movement’s brutal catch: ‘Talk to immigrants’
Clinton judge orders DOJ to unseal the Epstein files it has been keeping hidden
Pilot Teams Up with Daughter on His Final Flight for Southwest
Luigi Mangione’s team fires back at plea deal report, calls leaks threat to fair trial
Small plane crashes into Beijing’s tallest building
John Bolton pleads guilty to one count of mishandling classified information
White House condemns ‘targeted sabotage’ of reflecting pool as repairs pushed past July 4 celebration
Charlie Kirk judge to rule on Tyler Robinson’s attempt to have potential death penalty removed
Politico: Dems Patriotism Problems So Bad They Have Issues Rooting for US World Cup Success
John Bolton Set to Take Plea Deal: Report
WATCH: AOC lashes out at Trump for ‘betrayal’ of voters after key SCOTUS immigration rulings
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Trump commission unveils 12-point blueprint to expand US religious liberty protections
Watch: JD Vance Has Hilarious ‘Note to Protesters’ Yelling at Him in a Foreign Language
DHS Delivers Bad News for 300,000 Haitians in the US: ‘It’s Closing Time’
New York City pours $15M into sex change initiatives as Mamdani accuses federal government of intimidation
Socialists sweep NYC as Americans balk at movement’s brutal catch: ‘Talk to immigrants’
Clinton judge orders DOJ to unseal the Epstein files it has been keeping hidden
Pilot Teams Up with Daughter on His Final Flight for Southwest
Luigi Mangione’s team fires back at plea deal report, calls leaks threat to fair trial
Small plane crashes into Beijing’s tallest building
John Bolton pleads guilty to one count of mishandling classified information
White House condemns ‘targeted sabotage’ of reflecting pool as repairs pushed past July 4 celebration
Charlie Kirk judge to rule on Tyler Robinson’s attempt to have potential death penalty removed
Politico: Dems Patriotism Problems So Bad They Have Issues Rooting for US World Cup Success
John Bolton Set to Take Plea Deal: Report
WATCH: AOC lashes out at Trump for ‘betrayal’ of voters after key SCOTUS immigration rulings
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
