CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Senate unanimously votes to send bill demanding Epstein file release to Trump’s desk
Former Obama staffer, ex-congressman among candidates in crowded Democrat primary for Mikie Sherrill’s seat
Report: George Soros Sent Funding to Group That Aims to Crush Conservative Media
Mexican president rejects US striking drug cartels despite riots over violent crime
YouTube fishing creator Mikey Rijavec found dead days after mayday call off Mexico coast
Watch: Professor Crashes Turning Point Meeting and Berates Students
Chicago woman set on fire during argument on CTA train, police say
Power stripped from Education Department in latest Trump administration move to dismantle it
US Ambassador Michael Waltz declares atrocities against Christians in Nigeria ‘genocide’
Catholic Priest and ‘Many Others’ Kidnapped by Armed Assailants
Republicans given green light to vote for Epstein list: ‘We’re done with words’
Republicans revive bid to require proof of citizenship for mail-in voter registration
Former Clinton and Obama Admin Official ‘Deeply Ashamed’ After Being Snared in Epstein Email Release
Mike Johnson reveals how he’ll vote on Epstein files bill led by Trump critic Thomas Massie
Headed for the exits: Why 3 dozen House members aren’t running for re-election
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Senate unanimously votes to send bill demanding Epstein file release to Trump’s desk
Former Obama staffer, ex-congressman among candidates in crowded Democrat primary for Mikie Sherrill’s seat
Report: George Soros Sent Funding to Group That Aims to Crush Conservative Media
Mexican president rejects US striking drug cartels despite riots over violent crime
YouTube fishing creator Mikey Rijavec found dead days after mayday call off Mexico coast
Watch: Professor Crashes Turning Point Meeting and Berates Students
Chicago woman set on fire during argument on CTA train, police say
Power stripped from Education Department in latest Trump administration move to dismantle it
US Ambassador Michael Waltz declares atrocities against Christians in Nigeria ‘genocide’
Catholic Priest and ‘Many Others’ Kidnapped by Armed Assailants
Republicans given green light to vote for Epstein list: ‘We’re done with words’
Republicans revive bid to require proof of citizenship for mail-in voter registration
Former Clinton and Obama Admin Official ‘Deeply Ashamed’ After Being Snared in Epstein Email Release
Mike Johnson reveals how he’ll vote on Epstein files bill led by Trump critic Thomas Massie
Headed for the exits: Why 3 dozen House members aren’t running for re-election
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
