CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Jim Acosta ruthlessly mocked for comparing removal of Trump’s name from Kennedy Center to fall of Berlin Wall
Haitian fraudster’s eye-popping taxpayer-backed drug scam puts Congress on the hunt
Horror Discovery: Remains of More Than 30 Unborn Babies Found in Pathologist’s Garden
Stephen A. Smith says ‘Karmelo Anthony murdered Austin Metcalf’
Iran Says Fighting Will End ‘Immediately and Permanently’ After Trump Announces Peace Deal
Zelensky laments Russian attack that damaged 1,000-year-old church
Trump Announces Iran Deal Is Complete, Says Military Operations Will End Immediately
Missouri skydiving plane crash that killed all 12 aboard is a ‘devastating loss,’ company says
Trump bet tariffs would bring back American factory jobs. New report says it didn’t work
Trump heads to G7 with Iran deal momentum, trade fights waiting
Both gubernatorial candidates look to Make Iowa Healthy Again
Immigrants filed tens of thousands of lawsuits in Trump’s first year
Detroit sisters accused of stabbing restaurant worker after wrong food order
Trump mixes sports and patriotism with UFC Freedom 250 ‘spectacle’
UFC Freedom 250 White House event: Photos
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Jim Acosta ruthlessly mocked for comparing removal of Trump’s name from Kennedy Center to fall of Berlin Wall
Haitian fraudster’s eye-popping taxpayer-backed drug scam puts Congress on the hunt
Horror Discovery: Remains of More Than 30 Unborn Babies Found in Pathologist’s Garden
Stephen A. Smith says ‘Karmelo Anthony murdered Austin Metcalf’
Iran Says Fighting Will End ‘Immediately and Permanently’ After Trump Announces Peace Deal
Zelensky laments Russian attack that damaged 1,000-year-old church
Trump Announces Iran Deal Is Complete, Says Military Operations Will End Immediately
Missouri skydiving plane crash that killed all 12 aboard is a ‘devastating loss,’ company says
Trump bet tariffs would bring back American factory jobs. New report says it didn’t work
Trump heads to G7 with Iran deal momentum, trade fights waiting
Both gubernatorial candidates look to Make Iowa Healthy Again
Immigrants filed tens of thousands of lawsuits in Trump’s first year
Detroit sisters accused of stabbing restaurant worker after wrong food order
Trump mixes sports and patriotism with UFC Freedom 250 ‘spectacle’
UFC Freedom 250 White House event: Photos
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
