CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Have You Seen Him? Police Search for Murderer Who Escaped Tennessee Prison
Breaking: Comey Charged for Reportedly Leaking National Security Secrets in 2016
Not even sky high gas prices or the Iran war will stop Trump supporters voting MAGA
DOJ seeks to prosecute Comey over alleged national defense disclosure
Trump says Brazil election likely ‘rigged’ as Bolsonaro demands Lula’s victory be annulled
Illegal immigrant accused of beheading Iwo Jima monument granted bond
Man found dead on Disneyland property near entrance to ‘Happiest Place on Earth’
Four things to know about the Israeli election
Omar’s menacing message hidden in seemingly innocent tweet exposed: ‘Crushed the enemy’
Haley Stevens ripped by fellow Dems for refusing to explicitly back El-Sayed: ‘Stay the f— off television’
WJ Straw Poll: Rubio Opens Massive Lead Over Vance as Massie Takes Another Hit
Winning: Violent Crime Plunged Nationwide During Trump’s First Year Back in Office
Voice of Bugs Bunny and Daffy Duck Dies Suddenly at Age 46
Trump-appointed judge slams door on DOJ as court losses pile up days ahead of midterms
Ilhan Omar joins ‘polarizing and dangerous’ streamer at campaign event despite Democratic backlash
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Have You Seen Him? Police Search for Murderer Who Escaped Tennessee Prison
Breaking: Comey Charged for Reportedly Leaking National Security Secrets in 2016
Not even sky high gas prices or the Iran war will stop Trump supporters voting MAGA
DOJ seeks to prosecute Comey over alleged national defense disclosure
Trump says Brazil election likely ‘rigged’ as Bolsonaro demands Lula’s victory be annulled
Illegal immigrant accused of beheading Iwo Jima monument granted bond
Man found dead on Disneyland property near entrance to ‘Happiest Place on Earth’
Four things to know about the Israeli election
Omar’s menacing message hidden in seemingly innocent tweet exposed: ‘Crushed the enemy’
Haley Stevens ripped by fellow Dems for refusing to explicitly back El-Sayed: ‘Stay the f— off television’
WJ Straw Poll: Rubio Opens Massive Lead Over Vance as Massie Takes Another Hit
Winning: Violent Crime Plunged Nationwide During Trump’s First Year Back in Office
Voice of Bugs Bunny and Daffy Duck Dies Suddenly at Age 46
Trump-appointed judge slams door on DOJ as court losses pile up days ahead of midterms
Ilhan Omar joins ‘polarizing and dangerous’ streamer at campaign event despite Democratic backlash
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
