CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Charlotte train stabbing suspect dodges potential death penalty for now after he’s ruled incompetent
Bombshell claims by former campaign director rock Platner’s campaign hours before polls open
Watch: NY Knicks Fans Desecrate National Anthem to Spite Trump
Utah prosecutors ask judge to shut down delay tactics in Charlie Kirk assassination case
Four Armed Teens Try To Carjack Marine Vet: It Doesn’t End Well for Them
Trump’s SAVE America Act shows signs of life in the Senate despite Republican revolt
EPA And Private Business Helps LA Wildfire Survivors Where City Won’t
GOP grows antsy over Trump intel pick as Democrats vow spy powers revolt
75-Year-Old Nabbed at Border With Half a Million in Hard Narcotics
US Army helicopter goes down, but President Donald Trump says ‘pilots are fine’
GOP lawmaker warns voters that Platner’s ‘extreme’ policies just as concerning as his baggage: ‘Stay away’
Trump DOJ intensifies scrutiny of California as ballot counting continues
Vance refers Tim Walz, Minnesota attorney general to DOJ for criminal investigation over state’s alleged fraud
Karmelo Anthony stays silent as analysts warn defense faces uphill battle in track meet stabbing trial
Massachusetts lawmakers pass bill to scrap ‘offensive language’ from state’s General Laws
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Charlotte train stabbing suspect dodges potential death penalty for now after he’s ruled incompetent
Bombshell claims by former campaign director rock Platner’s campaign hours before polls open
Watch: NY Knicks Fans Desecrate National Anthem to Spite Trump
Utah prosecutors ask judge to shut down delay tactics in Charlie Kirk assassination case
Four Armed Teens Try To Carjack Marine Vet: It Doesn’t End Well for Them
Trump’s SAVE America Act shows signs of life in the Senate despite Republican revolt
EPA And Private Business Helps LA Wildfire Survivors Where City Won’t
GOP grows antsy over Trump intel pick as Democrats vow spy powers revolt
75-Year-Old Nabbed at Border With Half a Million in Hard Narcotics
US Army helicopter goes down, but President Donald Trump says ‘pilots are fine’
GOP lawmaker warns voters that Platner’s ‘extreme’ policies just as concerning as his baggage: ‘Stay away’
Trump DOJ intensifies scrutiny of California as ballot counting continues
Vance refers Tim Walz, Minnesota attorney general to DOJ for criminal investigation over state’s alleged fraud
Karmelo Anthony stays silent as analysts warn defense faces uphill battle in track meet stabbing trial
Massachusetts lawmakers pass bill to scrap ‘offensive language’ from state’s General Laws
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
