CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
At least 27 dead in Bangkok after fire breaks out at bar: Officials
Two teen suspects held after 5 family members killed in ‘targeted mass shooting’
EMS dispatch audio captures emergency response before Lindsey Graham death announcement
Medical examiner releases preliminary findings in Lindsey Graham’s death as death certificate remains pending
Mitch McConnell breaks silence on mystery hospitalization after Graham’s death
From ‘disgrace’ to ‘family’: Trump’s remarkable journey with Lindsey Graham
Some Somali Kids Allegedly Spent Their July 4 Weekend Shooting People
Dr. Phil Speaks Out Against Anti-Christian Persecution
Here’s Why Judge Blocked Blue State’s Gun Ban
Father, son killed in plane crash on way home from baseball game
Graham’s death ignites GOP scramble for Senate seat as Trump hints he already has a favorite
Huckabee: Banner at Supreme Leader’s Funeral Exposes the Real Iran
Trump Spoke to Lindsay Graham Shortly Before His Death, Offers Glowing Praise for Late Republican
Report: Hours After Lindsay Graham’s Death, Nancy Mace Is Eyeing His Senate Seat
Trial of Man Accused of Lighting Infamous Los Angeles Palisades Fire Ends Inconclusively
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
At least 27 dead in Bangkok after fire breaks out at bar: Officials
Two teen suspects held after 5 family members killed in ‘targeted mass shooting’
EMS dispatch audio captures emergency response before Lindsey Graham death announcement
Medical examiner releases preliminary findings in Lindsey Graham’s death as death certificate remains pending
Mitch McConnell breaks silence on mystery hospitalization after Graham’s death
From ‘disgrace’ to ‘family’: Trump’s remarkable journey with Lindsey Graham
Some Somali Kids Allegedly Spent Their July 4 Weekend Shooting People
Dr. Phil Speaks Out Against Anti-Christian Persecution
Here’s Why Judge Blocked Blue State’s Gun Ban
Father, son killed in plane crash on way home from baseball game
Graham’s death ignites GOP scramble for Senate seat as Trump hints he already has a favorite
Huckabee: Banner at Supreme Leader’s Funeral Exposes the Real Iran
Trump Spoke to Lindsay Graham Shortly Before His Death, Offers Glowing Praise for Late Republican
Report: Hours After Lindsay Graham’s Death, Nancy Mace Is Eyeing His Senate Seat
Trial of Man Accused of Lighting Infamous Los Angeles Palisades Fire Ends Inconclusively
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
