CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Defense Claims Lindsay Clancy ‘Never Did Anything Wrong in Her Life’ in Closing Argument
Report: Trump Admin Nearing ‘Massive’ Venezuelan Oil Deal
RNC threatens legal action against New Jersey officials over noncitizens on voter rolls: ‘On notice’
Social media erupts after cops reportedly raid home of Ilhan Omar’s son: ‘Not a good look’
Watch: Hegseth Rights Another Biden Wrong – Upgrades Abbey Gate Heroes’ Awards After Previous Admin Wrongly Downgraded Them
Lutnick stumps for Trump’s Kennedy Center rebrand outside key court hearing
Restaurant Hands Dessert with Painful Birthday Message to Wheelchair-Bound Diner After Kitchen Staffer Misunderstands Instructions
US removes radioactive cancer-treatment material from Central American country over ‘dirty bomb’ risk
Embattled California Democrat to step aside as Dads Caucus chairman
White House silent on Iran-Oman Hormuz plan Tehran says would ban US warships
Socialist surge threatens Democrats in New Hampshire Senate race
California pastor charged with yearslong child molestation as investigators seek more victims: DA
Former Gitmo prosecutor likens 9/11 trial delay to ‘Frankenstein’s zombie court’
2 Iconic Breakfast Cereals Get MAHA Makeover
Appeals Court Shuts Down Democratic Rep’s Attempt to Dodge Federal Charges
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Defense Claims Lindsay Clancy ‘Never Did Anything Wrong in Her Life’ in Closing Argument
Report: Trump Admin Nearing ‘Massive’ Venezuelan Oil Deal
RNC threatens legal action against New Jersey officials over noncitizens on voter rolls: ‘On notice’
Social media erupts after cops reportedly raid home of Ilhan Omar’s son: ‘Not a good look’
Watch: Hegseth Rights Another Biden Wrong – Upgrades Abbey Gate Heroes’ Awards After Previous Admin Wrongly Downgraded Them
Lutnick stumps for Trump’s Kennedy Center rebrand outside key court hearing
Restaurant Hands Dessert with Painful Birthday Message to Wheelchair-Bound Diner After Kitchen Staffer Misunderstands Instructions
US removes radioactive cancer-treatment material from Central American country over ‘dirty bomb’ risk
Embattled California Democrat to step aside as Dads Caucus chairman
White House silent on Iran-Oman Hormuz plan Tehran says would ban US warships
Socialist surge threatens Democrats in New Hampshire Senate race
California pastor charged with yearslong child molestation as investigators seek more victims: DA
Former Gitmo prosecutor likens 9/11 trial delay to ‘Frankenstein’s zombie court’
2 Iconic Breakfast Cereals Get MAHA Makeover
Appeals Court Shuts Down Democratic Rep’s Attempt to Dodge Federal Charges
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
