CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Watch: Boy, 9, Has Slick Message for Bank Robber He Rescued His Nana From
Watch: Legendary ‘Journey’ Band Member, Songwriter Tells Trump-Hating Bruce Springsteen to ‘Shut Up’
Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed accused Trump of inciting terrorism over Whitmer kidnapping plot
WATCH: Scalise serves up Olive Garden reality check for Democrats in voter ID fight
Illinois worker spent over six hours trapped in gas station sign too tall for fire truck ladders to reach
Purported Nancy Guthrie note includes unusual demand that breaks basic ransom rule: retired FBI negotiator
Rep. Jimmy Gomez’s toughest opponent may be an ethics investigation
Secret Service offers glimpse into WHCA Dinner security after alleged Trump assassination attempt
French Modeling Scout with Ties to Epstein Found Dead Near Paris
Boasberg delivers fresh immigration setback to Trump in free-speech clash
‘So Devastated’: Hollywood Stars Mourn Death of 18-Year-Old Actress
Academics and CEOs dominate Fed advisory boards
28 for ’28: The open presidential race field could reach more than two dozen candidates
Nolan’s ‘The Odyssey’ is clumsy, anachronistic, and badly acted
China’s routing of Biden in chip war with US created a communist tech giant
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Watch: Boy, 9, Has Slick Message for Bank Robber He Rescued His Nana From
Watch: Legendary ‘Journey’ Band Member, Songwriter Tells Trump-Hating Bruce Springsteen to ‘Shut Up’
Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed accused Trump of inciting terrorism over Whitmer kidnapping plot
WATCH: Scalise serves up Olive Garden reality check for Democrats in voter ID fight
Illinois worker spent over six hours trapped in gas station sign too tall for fire truck ladders to reach
Purported Nancy Guthrie note includes unusual demand that breaks basic ransom rule: retired FBI negotiator
Rep. Jimmy Gomez’s toughest opponent may be an ethics investigation
Secret Service offers glimpse into WHCA Dinner security after alleged Trump assassination attempt
French Modeling Scout with Ties to Epstein Found Dead Near Paris
Boasberg delivers fresh immigration setback to Trump in free-speech clash
‘So Devastated’: Hollywood Stars Mourn Death of 18-Year-Old Actress
Academics and CEOs dominate Fed advisory boards
28 for ’28: The open presidential race field could reach more than two dozen candidates
Nolan’s ‘The Odyssey’ is clumsy, anachronistic, and badly acted
China’s routing of Biden in chip war with US created a communist tech giant
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
