CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Jack Smith withheld names from judges who greenlit GOP lawmakers’ phone records access
Trump tells Colorado governor and district attorney to ‘rot in Hell’ over Tina Peters incarceration
Germany’s Merz says Europe must ‘defend and assert’ interests amid ‘changing’ relations with US
Somali daycare in Minnesota broken into, key documents stolen in overnight burglary
Blue cities U-turn on distributing drug supplies to addicts after progressive policies fail to stem epidemic
President Trump Has a Backup Plan if the Supreme Court Strikes Down His Tariffs
Treasury targets oil traders, tankers accused of helping Maduro evade U.S. sanctions
Ex-police officer given prison time in case prosecuted under Soros DA sees conviction overturned a year later
Trump Presides Over the Largest One-Year Drop in Homicides Ever Recorded
CNN Finally Shows Up at Minneapolis Day Care, But for All the Wrong Reasons
Why the Times Square Ball Will Drop Twice This Year for the First Time Ever
San Francisco mayor quietly signs reparations fund that could lead to $5M payments per person
Boebert hits back at Trump after veto of Colorado water bill, raises retaliation concerns
Unseen Walmart video shows Bryan Kohberger acting differently after Idaho student murders
Comer, House Oversight demand answers in Minnesota fraud hearing, call on Walz to testify
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Jack Smith withheld names from judges who greenlit GOP lawmakers’ phone records access
Trump tells Colorado governor and district attorney to ‘rot in Hell’ over Tina Peters incarceration
Germany’s Merz says Europe must ‘defend and assert’ interests amid ‘changing’ relations with US
Somali daycare in Minnesota broken into, key documents stolen in overnight burglary
Blue cities U-turn on distributing drug supplies to addicts after progressive policies fail to stem epidemic
President Trump Has a Backup Plan if the Supreme Court Strikes Down His Tariffs
Treasury targets oil traders, tankers accused of helping Maduro evade U.S. sanctions
Ex-police officer given prison time in case prosecuted under Soros DA sees conviction overturned a year later
Trump Presides Over the Largest One-Year Drop in Homicides Ever Recorded
CNN Finally Shows Up at Minneapolis Day Care, But for All the Wrong Reasons
Why the Times Square Ball Will Drop Twice This Year for the First Time Ever
San Francisco mayor quietly signs reparations fund that could lead to $5M payments per person
Boebert hits back at Trump after veto of Colorado water bill, raises retaliation concerns
Unseen Walmart video shows Bryan Kohberger acting differently after Idaho student murders
Comer, House Oversight demand answers in Minnesota fraud hearing, call on Walz to testify
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
