CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
‘Shop With a Cop’ Sends Less Fortunate Kids on Mini Christmas Shopping Sprees With New Police Pals
The iciest moments of 2025: The 5 political feuds that froze Washington
A Growing Share of British People Are Returning to Religion – But Not Christianity
Trump lists accomplishments, says ‘Radical Left Scum’ are ‘failing badly’ in Christmas message
It’s Easy to Lose Hope, but Twitter/X Has Gotten Massive Victories We Never Would Have Gotten in the Past – and Even More Wins Are Coming
How US troops celebrate Christmas abroad
Here Are Some New Trump Tax Breaks That Could Give Republicans an Advantage in the 2026 Midterm Elections
The biggest political events of 2025
UFO secret files, drone swarms and nuclear-linked sightings stun experts in 2025
Pictures: You Might Have Missed the Brand New Trump Portrait That Came With the WH Christmas Directions
Notorious Raccoon That Raided Liquor Store Makes Headlines Again – It Turns Out He’s a Serial Offender
Comedians who took on the US culture in 2025
Trump’s five most controversial pardons of 2025
Scavenger hunts, Christmas mass, Cajun-fried turkey: Capitol Hill’s favorite holiday traditions
Nearly 20 states sue HHS over declaration to restrict gender transition treatment for minors
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
‘Shop With a Cop’ Sends Less Fortunate Kids on Mini Christmas Shopping Sprees With New Police Pals
The iciest moments of 2025: The 5 political feuds that froze Washington
A Growing Share of British People Are Returning to Religion – But Not Christianity
Trump lists accomplishments, says ‘Radical Left Scum’ are ‘failing badly’ in Christmas message
It’s Easy to Lose Hope, but Twitter/X Has Gotten Massive Victories We Never Would Have Gotten in the Past – and Even More Wins Are Coming
How US troops celebrate Christmas abroad
Here Are Some New Trump Tax Breaks That Could Give Republicans an Advantage in the 2026 Midterm Elections
The biggest political events of 2025
UFO secret files, drone swarms and nuclear-linked sightings stun experts in 2025
Pictures: You Might Have Missed the Brand New Trump Portrait That Came With the WH Christmas Directions
Notorious Raccoon That Raided Liquor Store Makes Headlines Again – It Turns Out He’s a Serial Offender
Comedians who took on the US culture in 2025
Trump’s five most controversial pardons of 2025
Scavenger hunts, Christmas mass, Cajun-fried turkey: Capitol Hill’s favorite holiday traditions
Nearly 20 states sue HHS over declaration to restrict gender transition treatment for minors
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
