CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Hasan Piker becomes both a Democratic kingmaker — and political liability
Abdul El-Sayed’s Medicare-for-all crusade collides with an awkward contradiction involving his wife
GOP Senate Nominee Mike Rogers Kicks Off Race Against El-Sayed With a Big Swing
‘Large Jewish Dem Donors’ to Back Republican Mike Rogers After El-Sayed Wins Dem Primary: Report
DOJ puts $25 million bounty on US-born cartel leader
Trump’s antitrust point man could reshape Big Tech cases against Google and Apple if confirmed
US revokes Brazilian ambassador’s visa in diplomatic tit-for-tat
Alex Murdaugh’s lawsuit against Rebecca Hill dismissed by judge who says clerk doesn’t owe him for defense
FAA, NTSB investigating possible violation of safety protocol involving Trump, Marine One
Tlaib moves to block ICE airport arrests, says TSA helping target immigrants
Israel strikes Hezbollah in Lebanon as Rome peace talks continue
Exclusive: Grieving mom reveals deadly cost of illegal immigration as daughter’s killer seeks parole
‘Oxferd Comma’ investigation being declassified by White House, with John Solomon briefing
Putin selects commander to lead new drone warfare branch of Russian military
Trump Declares El-Sayed’s Michigan Win ‘Great News for the Republican Party’
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Hasan Piker becomes both a Democratic kingmaker — and political liability
Abdul El-Sayed’s Medicare-for-all crusade collides with an awkward contradiction involving his wife
GOP Senate Nominee Mike Rogers Kicks Off Race Against El-Sayed With a Big Swing
‘Large Jewish Dem Donors’ to Back Republican Mike Rogers After El-Sayed Wins Dem Primary: Report
DOJ puts $25 million bounty on US-born cartel leader
Trump’s antitrust point man could reshape Big Tech cases against Google and Apple if confirmed
US revokes Brazilian ambassador’s visa in diplomatic tit-for-tat
Alex Murdaugh’s lawsuit against Rebecca Hill dismissed by judge who says clerk doesn’t owe him for defense
FAA, NTSB investigating possible violation of safety protocol involving Trump, Marine One
Tlaib moves to block ICE airport arrests, says TSA helping target immigrants
Israel strikes Hezbollah in Lebanon as Rome peace talks continue
Exclusive: Grieving mom reveals deadly cost of illegal immigration as daughter’s killer seeks parole
‘Oxferd Comma’ investigation being declassified by White House, with John Solomon briefing
Putin selects commander to lead new drone warfare branch of Russian military
Trump Declares El-Sayed’s Michigan Win ‘Great News for the Republican Party’
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
