CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Republican who reportedly dropped out defeats Trump’s pick in key swing-district primary
Republicans move to oust embattled Florida GOP lawmaker in bitter primary fight
Musk Issues Stark Counter-Threat After Mamdani Team Member Declared Him ‘Valid Military Target’ According to Report
House Republican Ends Re-Election Campaign After Ethics Committee Recommends Censure
Details on Heavily Armed Person Roaming Golf Course Before Trump Visit Emerge, Notebook Seized
Disturbing: Gossip Columnist Perez Hilton Hospitalized After Harming Self on TikTok Live Stream
Takeaways from crucial primary elections across the country and more top headlines
Suspects in deadly Connecticut home invasion arrested in attack that rocked beach town
GOP governor endorses candidate challenging Trump-backed congressman in Republican US House primary
WATCH: Smithsonian director admits she sees history as ‘tool’ of ‘social justice’ in resurfaced 2025 clip
Marine veteran Las Vegas officer killed in shooting; armed suspect also dead
Democrats’ bitter civil war hits Michigan, but biggest prize still up for grabs
Trump warns Iran will be hit ‘really hard’ if nuclear negotiations collapse again
Socialist tenant organizer who blasted ‘sell-out Democrats’ loses Midwest primary
Dems rally behind Michigan prosecutor to champion party in crucial House race
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Republican who reportedly dropped out defeats Trump’s pick in key swing-district primary
Republicans move to oust embattled Florida GOP lawmaker in bitter primary fight
Musk Issues Stark Counter-Threat After Mamdani Team Member Declared Him ‘Valid Military Target’ According to Report
House Republican Ends Re-Election Campaign After Ethics Committee Recommends Censure
Details on Heavily Armed Person Roaming Golf Course Before Trump Visit Emerge, Notebook Seized
Disturbing: Gossip Columnist Perez Hilton Hospitalized After Harming Self on TikTok Live Stream
Takeaways from crucial primary elections across the country and more top headlines
Suspects in deadly Connecticut home invasion arrested in attack that rocked beach town
GOP governor endorses candidate challenging Trump-backed congressman in Republican US House primary
WATCH: Smithsonian director admits she sees history as ‘tool’ of ‘social justice’ in resurfaced 2025 clip
Marine veteran Las Vegas officer killed in shooting; armed suspect also dead
Democrats’ bitter civil war hits Michigan, but biggest prize still up for grabs
Trump warns Iran will be hit ‘really hard’ if nuclear negotiations collapse again
Socialist tenant organizer who blasted ‘sell-out Democrats’ loses Midwest primary
Dems rally behind Michigan prosecutor to champion party in crucial House race
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
