CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Judge in Tiger Woods hearing allows access to drug records
Warsh confirmed as Fed governor, with vote on chairmanship to follow
Court hears arguments on Missouri’s new map as Democrats try to claw back GOP redistricting gains
Mother’s Day dinner dispute turns violent as man accused of stabbing grandmother 11 times: police
27 cruise ship workers deported after CBP discovered trove of child pornography
Pentagon’s declassified UAP footage fuels Americans’ belief in aliens: ‘We’re not alone’
Senate weighs new, painful leverage tactic as fears of another government shutdown grow
Expert Thinks Iran’s New Ayatollah Could Be Dead, Says Top Regime Leaders Might Flee to Russia
Trump Promotes Kari Lake to Ambassador, Likely Bringing an End to Her Time Dismantling Liberal Voice of America
Jen Kiggans fends off calls to resign over radio interview
Pete Hegseth faces Congress over Pentagon’s unprecedented $1.5 trillion budget as Democrats vow to block it
Lightning Strikes Feet from Protesters Opposing Erika Kirk Speech: Report
Tulsi Gabbard Launches Investigation on 120 US-Funded Biolabs – Dozens Located in Ukraine
Fragile relationship with House GOP has Senate Republicans warning ‘something needs to change’
Russia ends ceasefire, launching ‘200 attack drones’ at Ukraine
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Judge in Tiger Woods hearing allows access to drug records
Warsh confirmed as Fed governor, with vote on chairmanship to follow
Court hears arguments on Missouri’s new map as Democrats try to claw back GOP redistricting gains
Mother’s Day dinner dispute turns violent as man accused of stabbing grandmother 11 times: police
27 cruise ship workers deported after CBP discovered trove of child pornography
Pentagon’s declassified UAP footage fuels Americans’ belief in aliens: ‘We’re not alone’
Senate weighs new, painful leverage tactic as fears of another government shutdown grow
Expert Thinks Iran’s New Ayatollah Could Be Dead, Says Top Regime Leaders Might Flee to Russia
Trump Promotes Kari Lake to Ambassador, Likely Bringing an End to Her Time Dismantling Liberal Voice of America
Jen Kiggans fends off calls to resign over radio interview
Pete Hegseth faces Congress over Pentagon’s unprecedented $1.5 trillion budget as Democrats vow to block it
Lightning Strikes Feet from Protesters Opposing Erika Kirk Speech: Report
Tulsi Gabbard Launches Investigation on 120 US-Funded Biolabs – Dozens Located in Ukraine
Fragile relationship with House GOP has Senate Republicans warning ‘something needs to change’
Russia ends ceasefire, launching ‘200 attack drones’ at Ukraine
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
