CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Trump Reveals Botched Attempt to Send Guns to the Iranian People: ‘I’m Very Upset’
Angel Dad Calls Out His State’s Dem Senators for Ignoring His Daughter’s Killing by Previously Deported Illegal
WATCH: Oklahoma trans attorney jailed for contempt after epic court meltdown
Trump touts airman rescue mission, boasts Iran could be ‘taken out in 1 night’
Israeli justice minister says government should ignore high court ruling on wartime protests
Trump touts drop in egg prices at White House Easter event
Trump reveals Iran made ‘significant proposal’ after ultimatum, but ‘not good enough’
Watch: Savannah Guthrie Returns to ‘Today’ Show, Pays Tribute to Missing Mother with Outfit
American woman missing after husband says she fell overboard, swept to sea during Bahamas boat trip: police
Power Company Faces Legal Fight For Making Too Much Energy
Newsom’s California rail project now expected to cost $126B, official admits, with still no tracks laid
Israel hits South Pars natural gas field as Trump deadline looms
Children of Illegal Aliens Linked to Attempted Bombing at U.S. Air Force Base
Martinez: Why President Trump’s War On Fraud Exposes National Scandal
Ceasefire proposal could reopen key oil route amid US-Iran tensions and more top headlines
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Trump Reveals Botched Attempt to Send Guns to the Iranian People: ‘I’m Very Upset’
Angel Dad Calls Out His State’s Dem Senators for Ignoring His Daughter’s Killing by Previously Deported Illegal
WATCH: Oklahoma trans attorney jailed for contempt after epic court meltdown
Trump touts airman rescue mission, boasts Iran could be ‘taken out in 1 night’
Israeli justice minister says government should ignore high court ruling on wartime protests
Trump touts drop in egg prices at White House Easter event
Trump reveals Iran made ‘significant proposal’ after ultimatum, but ‘not good enough’
Watch: Savannah Guthrie Returns to ‘Today’ Show, Pays Tribute to Missing Mother with Outfit
American woman missing after husband says she fell overboard, swept to sea during Bahamas boat trip: police
Power Company Faces Legal Fight For Making Too Much Energy
Newsom’s California rail project now expected to cost $126B, official admits, with still no tracks laid
Israel hits South Pars natural gas field as Trump deadline looms
Children of Illegal Aliens Linked to Attempted Bombing at U.S. Air Force Base
Martinez: Why President Trump’s War On Fraud Exposes National Scandal
Ceasefire proposal could reopen key oil route amid US-Iran tensions and more top headlines
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
