CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Video shows moments before Army veteran was fatally shot in Walmart parking lot dispute
WWII pilot missing after secret spy mission finally accounted for more than 80 years later
Trump’s ‘hero’ justice offers roadmap after Supreme Court rejects birthright order
Former KKK Grand Wizard praises Mamdani-endorsed socialist’s stance on interracial marriage
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna Declares War on the Senate Over SAVE America Act
MUST SEE: The Moment Actual Rough Riders Escort Trump’s Motorcade to the Teddy Roosevelt Library
Couple who climbed Empire State Building for engagement out on ‘supervised release’
Vatican says SSPX in schism, affirms excommunication of laity and clerics
Out of Control Tim Walz Pardons, Releases Illegal Child Rapist, Now ICE Likely Can’t Deport Him
Biden ‘madness’ still being revealed as father killed, children kidnapped by terror group member: DOJ
‘Corruption’ Allegations Fly as Controversial Referee Decision Dents US World Cup Hopes
WATCH: Lawler unloads on Raskin after fiery immigration hearing: ‘Grow the f— up’
Young psychotherapist mom butchered inside home as cops scramble to find her killer
Empire State Building security under scrutiny after climbers’ stunt, tourist reveals possible access point
China-linked green group training US judges draws fresh heat as foreign ties fuel pressure at home
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Video shows moments before Army veteran was fatally shot in Walmart parking lot dispute
WWII pilot missing after secret spy mission finally accounted for more than 80 years later
Trump’s ‘hero’ justice offers roadmap after Supreme Court rejects birthright order
Former KKK Grand Wizard praises Mamdani-endorsed socialist’s stance on interracial marriage
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna Declares War on the Senate Over SAVE America Act
MUST SEE: The Moment Actual Rough Riders Escort Trump’s Motorcade to the Teddy Roosevelt Library
Couple who climbed Empire State Building for engagement out on ‘supervised release’
Vatican says SSPX in schism, affirms excommunication of laity and clerics
Out of Control Tim Walz Pardons, Releases Illegal Child Rapist, Now ICE Likely Can’t Deport Him
Biden ‘madness’ still being revealed as father killed, children kidnapped by terror group member: DOJ
‘Corruption’ Allegations Fly as Controversial Referee Decision Dents US World Cup Hopes
WATCH: Lawler unloads on Raskin after fiery immigration hearing: ‘Grow the f— up’
Young psychotherapist mom butchered inside home as cops scramble to find her killer
Empire State Building security under scrutiny after climbers’ stunt, tourist reveals possible access point
China-linked green group training US judges draws fresh heat as foreign ties fuel pressure at home
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
