CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Paul Pelosi, 86, faces a hit-and-run charge after striking a parked car in Napa County: sheriff’s office
Illegal immigrant truck driver charged in death of trooper who moved home to care for mom with cancer
Heat wave cancels some DC Independence Day celebrations
Two Americas: Mamdani and Trump give speeches ahead of Independence Day
Here Are 5 Insane Books Elementary Schools Are Offering Kids
The Answer To America’s Food Security Woes
Trump pardons 9 people convicted of tampering with emission controls on diesel engines
Pope Leo urges US to welcome immigrants in America 250 speech before visiting global migrant hotspot
New York Democrats’ Gerrymander: Too Little, Too Late And Too Expensive
OpenAI’s Sam Altman wants to negotiate a 5% stake in company for US if competitors agree to key provision
Court Looks to Decide Fate of ‘Decoy’ Candidate with Same Name as Senator
Iran begins Khamenei’s funeral 126 days after assassination
July 1776 Copy of Declaration of Independence Discovered Outside US in Foreign Navy Captain’s Papers
WATCH – Charlie Kirk’s Final July 4 Message: ‘Why America Is a Christian Nation’
NC governor faces criticism for skipping Trump-backed America 250 event
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Paul Pelosi, 86, faces a hit-and-run charge after striking a parked car in Napa County: sheriff’s office
Illegal immigrant truck driver charged in death of trooper who moved home to care for mom with cancer
Heat wave cancels some DC Independence Day celebrations
Two Americas: Mamdani and Trump give speeches ahead of Independence Day
Here Are 5 Insane Books Elementary Schools Are Offering Kids
The Answer To America’s Food Security Woes
Trump pardons 9 people convicted of tampering with emission controls on diesel engines
Pope Leo urges US to welcome immigrants in America 250 speech before visiting global migrant hotspot
New York Democrats’ Gerrymander: Too Little, Too Late And Too Expensive
OpenAI’s Sam Altman wants to negotiate a 5% stake in company for US if competitors agree to key provision
Court Looks to Decide Fate of ‘Decoy’ Candidate with Same Name as Senator
Iran begins Khamenei’s funeral 126 days after assassination
July 1776 Copy of Declaration of Independence Discovered Outside US in Foreign Navy Captain’s Papers
WATCH – Charlie Kirk’s Final July 4 Message: ‘Why America Is a Christian Nation’
NC governor faces criticism for skipping Trump-backed America 250 event
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
