CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
UAE announces withdrawal of all forces from Yemen after Saudi ultimatum
Russia dismisses calls for evidence as doubt mounts against alleged Ukraine attack on Putin residence
Prepper czar warns Washington has US ‘set up for annihilation’
Artists cancel New Year’s Eve shows following ‘Trump–Kennedy Center’ rebrand
Watch: Scott Jennings Refuses to Let CNN Panel Twist Minnesota’s Somali Fraud Scandal
Rob and Michele Reiner Records Abruptly Sealed After Move by LAPD
Republicans eye Iowa Senate supermajority in Tuesday special election
Australian authorities say Bondi Beach suspects with Islamic State flags not part of ‘terrorist cell’
Saudi Arabia strikes Mukalla port over ‘extremely dangerous’ actions by ally UAE
Minnesota Dem Senate candidate faces call from opponent to apologize over viral ‘pandering’ hijab video
Corporate Media Outlets Turning a Blind Eye to Minnesota Fraud Involving Somalis
Minnesota State-Licensed ‘Day Care’ Has Listed Number Taking You To Tim Walz’s Office
Fetterman endorses prospect of potential future strikes to derail any Iranian nuclear ambitions
Armed Americans fight back: Inside 2025’s most gripping self-defense shootings across the US
2025 Most Memorable Heartwarming Moments: December 30, 2025
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
UAE announces withdrawal of all forces from Yemen after Saudi ultimatum
Russia dismisses calls for evidence as doubt mounts against alleged Ukraine attack on Putin residence
Prepper czar warns Washington has US ‘set up for annihilation’
Artists cancel New Year’s Eve shows following ‘Trump–Kennedy Center’ rebrand
Watch: Scott Jennings Refuses to Let CNN Panel Twist Minnesota’s Somali Fraud Scandal
Rob and Michele Reiner Records Abruptly Sealed After Move by LAPD
Republicans eye Iowa Senate supermajority in Tuesday special election
Australian authorities say Bondi Beach suspects with Islamic State flags not part of ‘terrorist cell’
Saudi Arabia strikes Mukalla port over ‘extremely dangerous’ actions by ally UAE
Minnesota Dem Senate candidate faces call from opponent to apologize over viral ‘pandering’ hijab video
Corporate Media Outlets Turning a Blind Eye to Minnesota Fraud Involving Somalis
Minnesota State-Licensed ‘Day Care’ Has Listed Number Taking You To Tim Walz’s Office
Fetterman endorses prospect of potential future strikes to derail any Iranian nuclear ambitions
Armed Americans fight back: Inside 2025’s most gripping self-defense shootings across the US
2025 Most Memorable Heartwarming Moments: December 30, 2025
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
