CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Andy Barr seeks to thwart ‘patently false’ Kentucky Senate ad with cease and desist
‘You can do everything right’: Crime reporter on sexual assault survival and lack of justice
Judge blocks Fulton County bid to force FBI testimony over seized election records
Long Island woman missing after jumping from moving vehicle in panicked state
Los Angeles schools accused of quietly funding race-based programming for Black students only
Trump pauses Iran energy plant strikes for 10 days as talks ‘going very well’
House Democrats vote to keep DHS shuttered as funding lapse hits day 40
Mysterious 4-Second Video Posted by Official White House Account Ignites Rampant Speculation
Army Increases Maximum Enlistment Age by 7 Years, Softens Other Restrictions
Fox News poll gives Trump highest disapproval rating across both his terms
Schumer, Democrats say they support voter ID — then block GOP amendment to require it
Trump reveals ‘present’ from Iran as oil tankers move through Strait of Hormuz
Report: Trump Weighing ‘Final Blow’ Options to End Iran War
Ex-Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich says Sheridan Gorman’s killing may have been a ‘gang initiation’
Lawyer for Boston cop facing manslaughter charge in on-duty shooting calls out DA’s ‘unprecedented’ move
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Andy Barr seeks to thwart ‘patently false’ Kentucky Senate ad with cease and desist
‘You can do everything right’: Crime reporter on sexual assault survival and lack of justice
Judge blocks Fulton County bid to force FBI testimony over seized election records
Long Island woman missing after jumping from moving vehicle in panicked state
Los Angeles schools accused of quietly funding race-based programming for Black students only
Trump pauses Iran energy plant strikes for 10 days as talks ‘going very well’
House Democrats vote to keep DHS shuttered as funding lapse hits day 40
Mysterious 4-Second Video Posted by Official White House Account Ignites Rampant Speculation
Army Increases Maximum Enlistment Age by 7 Years, Softens Other Restrictions
Fox News poll gives Trump highest disapproval rating across both his terms
Schumer, Democrats say they support voter ID — then block GOP amendment to require it
Trump reveals ‘present’ from Iran as oil tankers move through Strait of Hormuz
Report: Trump Weighing ‘Final Blow’ Options to End Iran War
Ex-Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich says Sheridan Gorman’s killing may have been a ‘gang initiation’
Lawyer for Boston cop facing manslaughter charge in on-duty shooting calls out DA’s ‘unprecedented’ move
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
