CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Is a Korean reality show the last honest sport?
SBA suspends nearly 7,000 Minnesota borrowers over suspected $400M pandemic loan fraud
The Trump administration’s unfinished business in Gaza
The Force adrift
Hours after taking office, NYC Mayor Mamdani targets landlords, moves to intervene in private bankruptcy case
Numbers Don’t Lie: CNN, MSNBC Ratings Flip Upside Down from Trump’s First Term to Trump 2.0
Happy New Year: Pentagon Ends 2025 with a Bang, Hits Narco-Terrorists Whose Drugs Will Not Kill Americans This Year
Historic Amsterdam Church Burns as ‘Unprecedented’ New Year’s Eve Violence Grips the City
Another Self-Driving Car Goes Rogue in California: Taxi Drives Passenger Into Active L.A. Fire Scene
Bernie Sanders ditches iconic mittens look while swearing in socialist Zohran Mamdani as NYC mayor
London mayor denies removing Star of David from fireworks show
Fox News ‘Antisemitism Exposed’ Newsletter: You won’t believe what TikTok was selling
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul Copies One of Trump’s Signature Policies
Mamdani vows to govern as ‘democratic socialist’ and embrace big government
At Least It Wasn’t Snakes: Disney Employee Injured After Errant ‘Indiana Jones’ Boulder Falls off Track
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Is a Korean reality show the last honest sport?
SBA suspends nearly 7,000 Minnesota borrowers over suspected $400M pandemic loan fraud
The Trump administration’s unfinished business in Gaza
The Force adrift
Hours after taking office, NYC Mayor Mamdani targets landlords, moves to intervene in private bankruptcy case
Numbers Don’t Lie: CNN, MSNBC Ratings Flip Upside Down from Trump’s First Term to Trump 2.0
Happy New Year: Pentagon Ends 2025 with a Bang, Hits Narco-Terrorists Whose Drugs Will Not Kill Americans This Year
Historic Amsterdam Church Burns as ‘Unprecedented’ New Year’s Eve Violence Grips the City
Another Self-Driving Car Goes Rogue in California: Taxi Drives Passenger Into Active L.A. Fire Scene
Bernie Sanders ditches iconic mittens look while swearing in socialist Zohran Mamdani as NYC mayor
London mayor denies removing Star of David from fireworks show
Fox News ‘Antisemitism Exposed’ Newsletter: You won’t believe what TikTok was selling
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul Copies One of Trump’s Signature Policies
Mamdani vows to govern as ‘democratic socialist’ and embrace big government
At Least It Wasn’t Snakes: Disney Employee Injured After Errant ‘Indiana Jones’ Boulder Falls off Track
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
