CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Mamdani expected to face legal trouble over PETA-backed horse carriage ban
Slotkin’s viral ‘threat’ to conservatives takes new twist as student moves to hold her accountable: ‘Shocking’
Breaking: High-Ranking Virginia Dem Arrested on Drug Trafficking, Money Laundering Charges
Alleged sham marriage ‘mastermind’ caught on video saying sanctuary state is ‘best place’ for illegals
ICE Calls Out Virginia County for Protecting Illegal Alien Child Predators
Fox News ‘Antisemitism Exposed’ Newsletter: French Jews forced into hiding as rioters terrorize streets
Man arrested for threatening another female lawmaker in Australia
Why Banks Are Suddenly Competing to Pause Your 21% Interest Into 2028
Report: Minnesota Dem Senate Nominee Spent Taxpayer Money to Teach Junkies How to Shove Drugs Up Their Posteriors
Rep Keith Self targeted in alleged assassination plot by Texas teen: report
House Dem leader’s attack on voter ID comes back to haunt him after election fraud bust in his home state
Report: Foreign National Accused of Running Over Teen and Leaving Him to Die Was Given Visa by Biden Admin
The Senate GOP’s midterm lifeline lies in an unlikely place
Abortion, ICE and socialism spark fireworks in swing state governor debate: 5 top moments
Kansas Senate rivals distance themselves from party leaders in fiery debate
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Mamdani expected to face legal trouble over PETA-backed horse carriage ban
Slotkin’s viral ‘threat’ to conservatives takes new twist as student moves to hold her accountable: ‘Shocking’
Breaking: High-Ranking Virginia Dem Arrested on Drug Trafficking, Money Laundering Charges
Alleged sham marriage ‘mastermind’ caught on video saying sanctuary state is ‘best place’ for illegals
ICE Calls Out Virginia County for Protecting Illegal Alien Child Predators
Fox News ‘Antisemitism Exposed’ Newsletter: French Jews forced into hiding as rioters terrorize streets
Man arrested for threatening another female lawmaker in Australia
Why Banks Are Suddenly Competing to Pause Your 21% Interest Into 2028
Report: Minnesota Dem Senate Nominee Spent Taxpayer Money to Teach Junkies How to Shove Drugs Up Their Posteriors
Rep Keith Self targeted in alleged assassination plot by Texas teen: report
House Dem leader’s attack on voter ID comes back to haunt him after election fraud bust in his home state
Report: Foreign National Accused of Running Over Teen and Leaving Him to Die Was Given Visa by Biden Admin
The Senate GOP’s midterm lifeline lies in an unlikely place
Abortion, ICE and socialism spark fireworks in swing state governor debate: 5 top moments
Kansas Senate rivals distance themselves from party leaders in fiery debate
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
