CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Trump DOJ shores up anti-abortion groups’ support amid bid to salvage $1.8 billion Planned Parenthood lawsuit
Official Who Waged War on DEI Out at DOJ
NTSB recovers cockpit voice recorder from Learjet crash site in Florida
Iran Accused of Hacking French Supermarket Refrigerators in Latest Cyber Attacks: ‘Unprecedented’
Watch: Liam Neeson Unable to Hide His Disgust When He Learns How Netflix Is Butchering ‘Narnia’
Cry-Bullies: Hilarity Breaks Out When Anti-Semites Bullying Jewish Shop Owners Realize They Themselves Are About to Get Bullied
South Carolina dad left sleeping 6-year-old in line for Pokémon cards at Target: police
Dana White takes questions at podium during White House briefing with Trump
Jeffries vows Democrats won’t ‘give a dime’ to Trump’s deportation efforts
Watch: CNN Interview Blows Up in Garcia’s Face After He Talks About Stephen Miller’s Crimes, But Can’t Name Any… Twice
Trump tells DHS chief to work with Democrats on immigration reform, but no amnesty
Breaking: GOP Navy SEAL Vet Holds on to House Seat in Battleground State
Trump’s redistricting gamble faces reckoning as GOP holdouts claim vindication
ASRA NOMANI: El-Sayed glides into role as rock star of the hard left’s red-green alliance
SCOTUS allows Trump admin to temporarily resume border construction in Texas’ Big Bend
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Trump DOJ shores up anti-abortion groups’ support amid bid to salvage $1.8 billion Planned Parenthood lawsuit
Official Who Waged War on DEI Out at DOJ
NTSB recovers cockpit voice recorder from Learjet crash site in Florida
Iran Accused of Hacking French Supermarket Refrigerators in Latest Cyber Attacks: ‘Unprecedented’
Watch: Liam Neeson Unable to Hide His Disgust When He Learns How Netflix Is Butchering ‘Narnia’
Cry-Bullies: Hilarity Breaks Out When Anti-Semites Bullying Jewish Shop Owners Realize They Themselves Are About to Get Bullied
South Carolina dad left sleeping 6-year-old in line for Pokémon cards at Target: police
Dana White takes questions at podium during White House briefing with Trump
Jeffries vows Democrats won’t ‘give a dime’ to Trump’s deportation efforts
Watch: CNN Interview Blows Up in Garcia’s Face After He Talks About Stephen Miller’s Crimes, But Can’t Name Any… Twice
Trump tells DHS chief to work with Democrats on immigration reform, but no amnesty
Breaking: GOP Navy SEAL Vet Holds on to House Seat in Battleground State
Trump’s redistricting gamble faces reckoning as GOP holdouts claim vindication
ASRA NOMANI: El-Sayed glides into role as rock star of the hard left’s red-green alliance
SCOTUS allows Trump admin to temporarily resume border construction in Texas’ Big Bend
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
