CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Police say criminal illegal alien injured 4 officers in Nebraska gas station shootout
NYC mayor-elect tells residents how to resist ICE agents knocking at their door in new video
Oklahoma trooper helps deliver newborn on highway shoulder: ‘The baby is coming!’
Congress unveils $900B defense bill targeting China with tech bans, investment crackdown, US troop pay raise
Trump adds his birthday as free national park day while axing MLK Day and Juneteenth
Obama Proves He’s Stuck in the Past, Offers Desperate Defense of Legacy Media
In Texas cattle country, one rancher welcomes Trump’s focus on decades of thin margins
MTG says she was denied security detail despite 773 death threats
A Detailed Account of the Nightmarish National Guard Shooting: Court Docs
Pearl Harbor remembrance ceremony marks 84 years since attack
Under the New ‘Trump Accounts,’ Your Baby Could Qualify for $1K: Here’s What to Know
Hamline University student brags on video that he celebrated Charlie Kirk’s assassination
Newsom team torched for image posted in response to mocking of gov’s ‘testicle-crushing’ sitting pose
Democrats escalate war-crime accusations as White House calls ‘innocent fisherman’ the new ‘Maryland Man’ hoax
First-Graders Leap Into Action and Save Their Teacher from Choking in Virginia Classroom
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Police say criminal illegal alien injured 4 officers in Nebraska gas station shootout
NYC mayor-elect tells residents how to resist ICE agents knocking at their door in new video
Oklahoma trooper helps deliver newborn on highway shoulder: ‘The baby is coming!’
Congress unveils $900B defense bill targeting China with tech bans, investment crackdown, US troop pay raise
Trump adds his birthday as free national park day while axing MLK Day and Juneteenth
Obama Proves He’s Stuck in the Past, Offers Desperate Defense of Legacy Media
In Texas cattle country, one rancher welcomes Trump’s focus on decades of thin margins
MTG says she was denied security detail despite 773 death threats
A Detailed Account of the Nightmarish National Guard Shooting: Court Docs
Pearl Harbor remembrance ceremony marks 84 years since attack
Under the New ‘Trump Accounts,’ Your Baby Could Qualify for $1K: Here’s What to Know
Hamline University student brags on video that he celebrated Charlie Kirk’s assassination
Newsom team torched for image posted in response to mocking of gov’s ‘testicle-crushing’ sitting pose
Democrats escalate war-crime accusations as White House calls ‘innocent fisherman’ the new ‘Maryland Man’ hoax
First-Graders Leap Into Action and Save Their Teacher from Choking in Virginia Classroom
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
