CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
California neighborhood on alert after bat found near sidewalk tests positive for rabies virus
Charter bus driver who allegedly caused crash killing 5 in Virginia charged with involuntary manslaughter
Delaney Hall protests intensify as far-left activists, ICE supporters converge in New Jersey
Gov. Sherrill blames ICE, defends rioters after deploying troopers to quell violent mob
What The Left’s Colorado Climate Lawsuit Is Really All About
New Yorker Sentenced To 40 Years in Prison After Slaying 4 People on a Midnight Rampage
CBS News’ Bari Weiss Fired A ’60 Minutes’ Producer Citing ‘New Approach’
Who Was in Charge? Dems Owe Answers After Jill Biden Says She Thought Joe Was ‘Having a Stroke’ During Debate
Why Does the Media Care That Has-Beens Are Withdrawing From ‘Freedom 250’ DC Event?
Watch: Mysterious Strangers Pile Out of Sewer Manhole, Prompts Police Investigation
WATCH: Disgraceful UK Police Chief Apologizes for Letting Student Bleed Out Because He Was Accused of Being a Racist
Anti-ICE agitator charged with allegedly biting officers during Delaney Hall clashes
Will China Really Invade Taiwan In The Next Five Years?
Trump threatened to ‘blow up’ Oman — why the tiny Gulf kingdom is caught between DC and Iran
Buyer’s Remorse: The Democratic Party’s Radical Lurch and the Reckoning It Invited In
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
California neighborhood on alert after bat found near sidewalk tests positive for rabies virus
Charter bus driver who allegedly caused crash killing 5 in Virginia charged with involuntary manslaughter
Delaney Hall protests intensify as far-left activists, ICE supporters converge in New Jersey
Gov. Sherrill blames ICE, defends rioters after deploying troopers to quell violent mob
What The Left’s Colorado Climate Lawsuit Is Really All About
New Yorker Sentenced To 40 Years in Prison After Slaying 4 People on a Midnight Rampage
CBS News’ Bari Weiss Fired A ’60 Minutes’ Producer Citing ‘New Approach’
Who Was in Charge? Dems Owe Answers After Jill Biden Says She Thought Joe Was ‘Having a Stroke’ During Debate
Why Does the Media Care That Has-Beens Are Withdrawing From ‘Freedom 250’ DC Event?
Watch: Mysterious Strangers Pile Out of Sewer Manhole, Prompts Police Investigation
WATCH: Disgraceful UK Police Chief Apologizes for Letting Student Bleed Out Because He Was Accused of Being a Racist
Anti-ICE agitator charged with allegedly biting officers during Delaney Hall clashes
Will China Really Invade Taiwan In The Next Five Years?
Trump threatened to ‘blow up’ Oman — why the tiny Gulf kingdom is caught between DC and Iran
Buyer’s Remorse: The Democratic Party’s Radical Lurch and the Reckoning It Invited In
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
