Sen. Elizabeth Warren is suspending her presidential campaign, a source familiar with the decision tells NBC News, a bitter blow for a senator who was long seen by prominent Democrats as headed for the White House.
It is unclear whether Warren will endorse another Democratic candidate for president.
The decision ends a frantic year of campaigning for a candidate who branded herself as a progressive fighter from humble beginnings who was ready to take on a broken and corrupt system.
The Massachusetts Democrat wowed crowds with her sharp intellect, her clear prognoses for complex problems, and her endless stream of policy blueprints to tackle them. After a long polling rise over summer that continued into the fall, it was clear Warren’s message was catching on, and she rose to the front of the pack in some polls while avoiding conflict with rivals.
The plan was working. Then it all started to fall apart.
Warren was pummeled on her “Medicare for All” plan by rivals like Pete Buttigieg, who started to peel away white college graduates, a group that formed the core of her base. She responded by releasing a series of detailed financing mechanisms, followed by a plan to transition onto Medicare for All in the third year of her presidency, moving first to establish a “public option” in the first year. The move didn’t placate moderates and it sowed doubts about her among left-leaning voters, who instead moved toward Sanders.
Senate Republicans push for House GOP rebellion against funding package, voter ID legislation
From Rodney King to Spitting and Kicking Alex Pretti, the Left’s Flawed Hero Worship Never Changes
Former Planned Parenthood Worker Gives Haunting Account of Her Past Work
What Trump’s next pick to lead the Federal Reserve means for your wallet
Hunter S. Thompson suicide ruling stands firm after 20-year review by Colorado investigators
The Left Doesn’t Care About Children, They Care About Using Them Because They Know You Care So Much
Black Pastor Gives Don Lemon a Warning After Storming Church: ‘Don Lemon, Don’t Come Here’
Potential Walz successor unleashes on state’s sanctuary policies: ‘The rule of law matters’
High-end car hustle crashes as couple accused of flipping luxury rides with bogus titles
Dems score big in typically red Texas district that Trump easily won in 2024
GOP reckons with Trump’s ICE blunders: ‘Defeat out of the jaws of victory’
Pro-Kamala Group Goes Dark After Getting Caught Fundraising Off Alex Pretti’s Death
Minneapolis ICE Haters Hauled Away in Cuffs Over Obnoxious, Illegal Tactic
MAGA queen of rap: Nicki Minaj becomes Trump’s newest White House surrogate
Trump says Iran ‘seriously talking to us’ as military ships head to Middle East
Meanwhile the crowded field of moderates, most notably the staying power of Joe Biden, made it harder for her to grow her support among the mainstream Democrats who backed Hillary Clinton in 2016. Questions about “electability” dogged her throughout the fall as many voters, haunted by the last presidential election, fretted that the U.S. wouldn’t elect a woman.
It was a quiet, even subconscious fear, thrust into the spotlight right before the Iowa caucuses when news broke of a late 2018 meeting between Warren and Sanders, during which Warren said Sanders told her he didn’t think a woman could beat President Donald Trump. The story led to a January debate stage confrontation, with Sanders denying he said it and Warren sticking by her re-telling of the story. The two later tried to quell the tensions — not wanting to alienate their progressive supporters. But the moment also made it harder for Warren to draw contrasts with her fellow progressive, at a time when it would’ve benefited her to show how she was different.
She wasn’t helped by polls that showed her faring worse than Sanders and Biden against Trump in key states like Michigan and Florida, reinforcing doubts among Democrats whose top concern was the only constant in this primary: finding a candidate who they could trust to defeat Trump.
Trump nourished this fear by repeatedly attacking her as “Pocahontas,” a reference to her decades-long claim of Native American ancestry and her 2018 decision to take a DNA test to prove it.
Senate Republicans push for House GOP rebellion against funding package, voter ID legislation
From Rodney King to Spitting and Kicking Alex Pretti, the Left’s Flawed Hero Worship Never Changes
Former Planned Parenthood Worker Gives Haunting Account of Her Past Work
What Trump’s next pick to lead the Federal Reserve means for your wallet
Hunter S. Thompson suicide ruling stands firm after 20-year review by Colorado investigators
The Left Doesn’t Care About Children, They Care About Using Them Because They Know You Care So Much
Black Pastor Gives Don Lemon a Warning After Storming Church: ‘Don Lemon, Don’t Come Here’
Potential Walz successor unleashes on state’s sanctuary policies: ‘The rule of law matters’
High-end car hustle crashes as couple accused of flipping luxury rides with bogus titles
Dems score big in typically red Texas district that Trump easily won in 2024
GOP reckons with Trump’s ICE blunders: ‘Defeat out of the jaws of victory’
Pro-Kamala Group Goes Dark After Getting Caught Fundraising Off Alex Pretti’s Death
Minneapolis ICE Haters Hauled Away in Cuffs Over Obnoxious, Illegal Tactic
MAGA queen of rap: Nicki Minaj becomes Trump’s newest White House surrogate
Trump says Iran ‘seriously talking to us’ as military ships head to Middle East
Ultimately, it was perhaps the crowded field that hurt her most. National and early state surveys of Democrats heading into the new year showed her leading all rivals on “second choice” preferences. Her campaign sought to turn that into a positive by debuting a new message of unity, pitching her as the candidate best-positioned to bridge the divides between the party’s left and moderate wings.
That, too, backfired. For many voters it was difficult to square “unity” with her “fighter” persona. Previous candidates attempting to bridge that divide had also failed, including Kamala Harris and Cory Booker.
After finishing just fourth and third in Iowa and New Hampshire, respectively, Warren dispensed with that message and revived her more combative persona, launching blistering attacks on new arrival Mike Bloomberg in the Las Vegas debate. She also finally abandoned her non-aggression pact with Sanders. It was a change-up that allies had pushed for for weeks; one that reminded progressives why they were attracted to her in the first place and led to a massive windfall of much-needed donations that kept her campaign afloat.
She followed that up in the Charleston, South Carolina debate the following week, arguing that she’d be more “effective” at passing a progressive agenda because, unlike Sanders, she sweats the details of policy and process.
But Sanders was already in a dominant position by then. After a disappointing Super Tuesday in which she won only a small portion of delegates and lost her home state, her campaign signaled that she was reassessing her path forward.
Her departure from the race means there are no more women in the top tier of the field.
Story cited here.
