Elizabeth Warren Doesn’t Want to Say How She’d Pay for Her Health Care Plan

Elizabeth Warren famously has a plan for everything—everything, that is, except financing the single-payer health care system she says she supports. It’s a telling omission that reveals what happens when Warren’s wonky tendencies come into conflict with her campaign mantras.

Since launching her presidential campaign, the Massachusetts Democrat has rolled out Warren-branded plans for everything from universal childcare to green energy to “economic patriotism.” But on health care, so far, the senator has been content to endorse Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All plan, which would eliminate most private health insurance and set up a government-run health insurance system, without putting forth one of her own.

The Sanders plan would, according to Sanders himself as well as multiple independent estimates, require new government spending totaling somewhere between $30 and $40 trillion a year. While Sanders has outlined ways to offset some of that cost, he hasn’t put forth a plan to fully finance the additional spending. He has, however, made clear that it would require higher taxes on the middle class.

Epstein File Photos Give ‘Powerful Reminder’ of Bill Clinton’s Scandalous Past

Pentagon taps Musk’s xAI to boost sensitive government workflows, support military operations

Multiple fatalities reported as Mexican Navy plane crashes off Texas coast, recovery effort underway

Fact Check: Did Education Secretary Linda McMahon Change the Meaning of Basic Words with ‘New Spelling Guidelines’?

Exclusive Photos: JD Vance joins Navy SEAL training, pushes limits in grueling workout

Heritage Foundation staffers quit and join Mike Pence foundation

ICE officers injured after illegal immigrant strikes agents, rams vehicles during arrest attempt

Brown University Janitor Warned Security About Suspect Weeks Before Shooting

Trump announces new ‘Trump-class’ battleships for US Navy’s ‘golden fleet’

Jasmine Crockett Cries ‘Racism’ After JD Vance Torches Her During AmFest Speech

Congress flees town as health care premiums set to explode for millions of Americans in January

DOJ appeals dismissal of James, Comey criminal cases in long-shot legal gamble

Travel scams create unlikely alliance amid battle for New Hampshire Senate seat

Tragic: Conan O’Brien Could Have Saved Reiners’ Lives if He Hadn’t Ordered Guests Not to Call the Police When Nick Spun Out of Control

Brown University hires former US Attorney Zachary Cunha as possible campus shooting lawsuits loom

But despite endorsing Sanders’ plan, Warren has repeatedly declined to say that middle-class taxes would have to go up. She dodged the question in earlier debates this year. And at the debate last night, she once again all but refused to answer the question directly.

Instead, she offered a vague promise that “middle-class families are going to pay less” while insisting that “those at the very top—the richest individuals and the biggest corporations—are going to pay more.”

When a debate moderator pressed her specifically on the question of taxes, she still declined to offer a direct response. Families have to deal with “total cost,” she said, reiterating her support for Medicare for All. “Costs are going to go up for wealthier individuals, and costs are going to go up for giant corporations. But for hard-working families across this country, costs are going to go down, and that’s how it should work under Medicare for All in our health care system.” The specific question—Would taxes rise for middle-class families?—remained unanswered.

In part, this is a sign that Warren, though running what is nominally a bold progressive campaign, has adopted the conventional Democratic playbook when it comes to tax hikes. As Russell Berman writes at The Atlantic, in recent years the party’s presidential candidates have tended to adhere to the rule that it’s OK to propose raising taxes on the rich—but not on the broadly defined middle class.