Elizabeth Warren Doesn’t Want to Say How She’d Pay for Her Health Care Plan

Elizabeth Warren famously has a plan for everything—everything, that is, except financing the single-payer health care system she says she supports. It’s a telling omission that reveals what happens when Warren’s wonky tendencies come into conflict with her campaign mantras.

Since launching her presidential campaign, the Massachusetts Democrat has rolled out Warren-branded plans for everything from universal childcare to green energy to “economic patriotism.” But on health care, so far, the senator has been content to endorse Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All plan, which would eliminate most private health insurance and set up a government-run health insurance system, without putting forth one of her own.

The Sanders plan would, according to Sanders himself as well as multiple independent estimates, require new government spending totaling somewhere between $30 and $40 trillion a year. While Sanders has outlined ways to offset some of that cost, he hasn’t put forth a plan to fully finance the additional spending. He has, however, made clear that it would require higher taxes on the middle class.

Self-Avowed ‘Socialist Socialite’ Roasted After Mocking Budget Dress Worn by Hegseth’s Wife

Teacher’s ‘Disgusting’ Comment About White House Correspondents’ Dinner Shooting Gets Him Placed on Leave

DHS taunts media for reporting about ‘Green Bay man’ illegal immigrant charged in vicious machete attack

Ghost in the gallery: George Washington looks on as King Charles addresses Congress

Dem and GOP lawmakers trade blame over rhetoric after WHCD shooting: ‘It is disgusting’

Dem plot to limit Trump war powers on Cuba fails as GOP falls in line with military action abroad

Five key themes of King Charles III’s address to Congress

Starmer escapes inquiry on Mandelson vetting by a Parliament vote

FBI brings alleged China-linked hacker to US in rare extradition as Patel defends Italy trip

Tim Walz Shamed After Trying to Take Credit for Federal Raids on Somali-Owned Minnesota Businesses

ABC Not Firing Jimmy Kimmel After Melania ‘Widow’ Comments Feels Like Network Flipping Off Millions

Influencer’s body returns home after safari getaway as missing ring and fiancé questions cloud case: report

Melania Trump, Queen Camilla team up at White House youth event spotlighting US-UK bond

Body camera video shows police officer allegedly kidnapped by armed robbery suspect in roadside showdown

WATCH: Ilhan Omar roasted for brutal resurfaced video about ‘World War Eleven’

But despite endorsing Sanders’ plan, Warren has repeatedly declined to say that middle-class taxes would have to go up. She dodged the question in earlier debates this year. And at the debate last night, she once again all but refused to answer the question directly.

Instead, she offered a vague promise that “middle-class families are going to pay less” while insisting that “those at the very top—the richest individuals and the biggest corporations—are going to pay more.”

When a debate moderator pressed her specifically on the question of taxes, she still declined to offer a direct response. Families have to deal with “total cost,” she said, reiterating her support for Medicare for All. “Costs are going to go up for wealthier individuals, and costs are going to go up for giant corporations. But for hard-working families across this country, costs are going to go down, and that’s how it should work under Medicare for All in our health care system.” The specific question—Would taxes rise for middle-class families?—remained unanswered.

In part, this is a sign that Warren, though running what is nominally a bold progressive campaign, has adopted the conventional Democratic playbook when it comes to tax hikes. As Russell Berman writes at The Atlantic, in recent years the party’s presidential candidates have tended to adhere to the rule that it’s OK to propose raising taxes on the rich—but not on the broadly defined middle class.