Elizabeth Warren Doesn’t Want to Say How She’d Pay for Her Health Care Plan

Elizabeth Warren famously has a plan for everything—everything, that is, except financing the single-payer health care system she says she supports. It’s a telling omission that reveals what happens when Warren’s wonky tendencies come into conflict with her campaign mantras.

Since launching her presidential campaign, the Massachusetts Democrat has rolled out Warren-branded plans for everything from universal childcare to green energy to “economic patriotism.” But on health care, so far, the senator has been content to endorse Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All plan, which would eliminate most private health insurance and set up a government-run health insurance system, without putting forth one of her own.

The Sanders plan would, according to Sanders himself as well as multiple independent estimates, require new government spending totaling somewhere between $30 and $40 trillion a year. While Sanders has outlined ways to offset some of that cost, he hasn’t put forth a plan to fully finance the additional spending. He has, however, made clear that it would require higher taxes on the middle class.

Trump sends troops $1,776 bonus checks, and Biden coal, in Christmas speech to nation

Lethal US strike sinks narco-terrorist vessel along major Pacific drug route, Pentagon confirms

Border Patrol chief, progressive mayor caught on camera in tense street showdown: ‘Excellent day in Evanston’

Federal employees in the hot seat as GOP senator pushes transparency proposal: ‘Historic opportunity’

Dramatic bodycam video captures moment suspected kidnapper is arrested after 40 years on the run

Barack and Michelle Obama Had Plans with the Reiners on the Night of Their Death

Ford Pays a $19.5 Billion Price After Realizing it Fell for Biden’s EV Scam

Statue of Little-Known Civil Rights Activist Replaces Robert E. Lee in U.S. Capitol

Breaking: Bongino Stepping Down as Deputy Director of the FBI

Nearly two-thirds of American voters back social media ban for kids under 16, Fox News poll shows

Trump set to address the nation in primetime White House speech as Americans report economic squeeze

DOJ should not have dropped Trump codefendant charges: Jack Smith

Trump unveils disparaging ‘Presidential Walk of Fame’ plaques under Biden and Obama portraits

Newly Declassified Emails Show FBI Desperately Wanted to Avoid Mar-a-Lago Raid, Begged Biden’s DOJ for Other Options, But Was Denied

Former Texas coach allegedly used AI document to groom teen with manipulation tactics: report

But despite endorsing Sanders’ plan, Warren has repeatedly declined to say that middle-class taxes would have to go up. She dodged the question in earlier debates this year. And at the debate last night, she once again all but refused to answer the question directly.

Instead, she offered a vague promise that “middle-class families are going to pay less” while insisting that “those at the very top—the richest individuals and the biggest corporations—are going to pay more.”

When a debate moderator pressed her specifically on the question of taxes, she still declined to offer a direct response. Families have to deal with “total cost,” she said, reiterating her support for Medicare for All. “Costs are going to go up for wealthier individuals, and costs are going to go up for giant corporations. But for hard-working families across this country, costs are going to go down, and that’s how it should work under Medicare for All in our health care system.” The specific question—Would taxes rise for middle-class families?—remained unanswered.

In part, this is a sign that Warren, though running what is nominally a bold progressive campaign, has adopted the conventional Democratic playbook when it comes to tax hikes. As Russell Berman writes at The Atlantic, in recent years the party’s presidential candidates have tended to adhere to the rule that it’s OK to propose raising taxes on the rich—but not on the broadly defined middle class.