Elizabeth Warren Doesn’t Want to Say How She’d Pay for Her Health Care Plan

Elizabeth Warren famously has a plan for everything—everything, that is, except financing the single-payer health care system she says she supports. It’s a telling omission that reveals what happens when Warren’s wonky tendencies come into conflict with her campaign mantras.

Since launching her presidential campaign, the Massachusetts Democrat has rolled out Warren-branded plans for everything from universal childcare to green energy to “economic patriotism.” But on health care, so far, the senator has been content to endorse Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All plan, which would eliminate most private health insurance and set up a government-run health insurance system, without putting forth one of her own.

The Sanders plan would, according to Sanders himself as well as multiple independent estimates, require new government spending totaling somewhere between $30 and $40 trillion a year. While Sanders has outlined ways to offset some of that cost, he hasn’t put forth a plan to fully finance the additional spending. He has, however, made clear that it would require higher taxes on the middle class.

Heat wave cancels some DC Independence Day celebrations

Two Americas: Mamdani and Trump give speeches ahead of Independence Day

Here Are 5 Insane Books Elementary Schools Are Offering Kids

The Answer To America’s Food Security Woes

Trump pardons 9 people convicted of tampering with emission controls on diesel engines

Pope Leo urges US to welcome immigrants in America 250 speech before visiting global migrant hotspot

OpenAI’s Sam Altman wants to negotiate a 5% stake in company for US if competitors agree to key provision

Iran begins Khamenei’s funeral 126 days after assassination

July 1776 Copy of Declaration of Independence Discovered Outside US in Foreign Navy Captain’s Papers

WATCH – Charlie Kirk’s Final July 4 Message: ‘Why America Is a Christian Nation’

NC governor faces criticism for skipping Trump-backed America 250 event

Trump’s Mount Rushmore address features 28 minutes of iconic words, 23 minutes of dazzling light, fireworks

Thune and Trump share friendly greeting after critical clashes

CEO’s fire death sparks mystery, will fight over tech titan’s fortune

Top Trump official touts how DC makeover is proof America is rejecting ‘decline by choice’

But despite endorsing Sanders’ plan, Warren has repeatedly declined to say that middle-class taxes would have to go up. She dodged the question in earlier debates this year. And at the debate last night, she once again all but refused to answer the question directly.

Instead, she offered a vague promise that “middle-class families are going to pay less” while insisting that “those at the very top—the richest individuals and the biggest corporations—are going to pay more.”

When a debate moderator pressed her specifically on the question of taxes, she still declined to offer a direct response. Families have to deal with “total cost,” she said, reiterating her support for Medicare for All. “Costs are going to go up for wealthier individuals, and costs are going to go up for giant corporations. But for hard-working families across this country, costs are going to go down, and that’s how it should work under Medicare for All in our health care system.” The specific question—Would taxes rise for middle-class families?—remained unanswered.

In part, this is a sign that Warren, though running what is nominally a bold progressive campaign, has adopted the conventional Democratic playbook when it comes to tax hikes. As Russell Berman writes at The Atlantic, in recent years the party’s presidential candidates have tended to adhere to the rule that it’s OK to propose raising taxes on the rich—but not on the broadly defined middle class.