Elizabeth Warren Doesn’t Want to Say How She’d Pay for Her Health Care Plan

Elizabeth Warren famously has a plan for everything—everything, that is, except financing the single-payer health care system she says she supports. It’s a telling omission that reveals what happens when Warren’s wonky tendencies come into conflict with her campaign mantras.

Since launching her presidential campaign, the Massachusetts Democrat has rolled out Warren-branded plans for everything from universal childcare to green energy to “economic patriotism.” But on health care, so far, the senator has been content to endorse Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All plan, which would eliminate most private health insurance and set up a government-run health insurance system, without putting forth one of her own.

The Sanders plan would, according to Sanders himself as well as multiple independent estimates, require new government spending totaling somewhere between $30 and $40 trillion a year. While Sanders has outlined ways to offset some of that cost, he hasn’t put forth a plan to fully finance the additional spending. He has, however, made clear that it would require higher taxes on the middle class.

Schumer accuses Trump of exploiting Charlie Kirk’s death to launch political ‘witch hunt’

Watch: Melania Trump and Princess Kate Team Up to Delight Young Children

Turning Point USA Preparing for Potential Legal Action Against Charlie Kirk Slanderers: ‘We Have Good Lawyers’

Virginia boys notch court win after being labeled ‘sexual harassers’ over transgender locker room complaint

Trump says Jimmy Kimmel pulled off air due to ‘lack of talent’

SCOOP: Iryna Zarutska stabbing fuels transit safety overhaul talks in House

Video: ‘This Is Worse’ – Tearful Leftist Panics as She Watches Conservatives Begin Avenging Martyred Hero

Resolution to Punish Ilhan Omar for Kirk Comments Fails After 4 Republicans Side with Democrats

FBI Pittsburgh ramming suspect quoted Lincoln assassin during confession, special agent says

Portland ramps up pressure on ICE building with land use violation notice

‘What would Jesus do?’ Utah students torn on death penalty for Charlie Kirk’s accused killer

Keith Olbermann Could Be Cancelled by the Time You Finish This Article: Evil Kirk Comment Will Finish Him for Good

Trump swaps Windsor Castle for Chequers in final leg of UK state visit

Prosecutors to wrap Trump assassination attempt case as defense readies witnesses

Watch: Schumer Has Weird On-Air Malfunction, Gets Stuck in Loop for 40 Seconds Straight Over Kimmel Suspension

But despite endorsing Sanders’ plan, Warren has repeatedly declined to say that middle-class taxes would have to go up. She dodged the question in earlier debates this year. And at the debate last night, she once again all but refused to answer the question directly.

Instead, she offered a vague promise that “middle-class families are going to pay less” while insisting that “those at the very top—the richest individuals and the biggest corporations—are going to pay more.”

When a debate moderator pressed her specifically on the question of taxes, she still declined to offer a direct response. Families have to deal with “total cost,” she said, reiterating her support for Medicare for All. “Costs are going to go up for wealthier individuals, and costs are going to go up for giant corporations. But for hard-working families across this country, costs are going to go down, and that’s how it should work under Medicare for All in our health care system.” The specific question—Would taxes rise for middle-class families?—remained unanswered.

In part, this is a sign that Warren, though running what is nominally a bold progressive campaign, has adopted the conventional Democratic playbook when it comes to tax hikes. As Russell Berman writes at The Atlantic, in recent years the party’s presidential candidates have tended to adhere to the rule that it’s OK to propose raising taxes on the rich—but not on the broadly defined middle class.