Elizabeth Warren Doesn’t Want to Say How She’d Pay for Her Health Care Plan

Elizabeth Warren famously has a plan for everything—everything, that is, except financing the single-payer health care system she says she supports. It’s a telling omission that reveals what happens when Warren’s wonky tendencies come into conflict with her campaign mantras.

Since launching her presidential campaign, the Massachusetts Democrat has rolled out Warren-branded plans for everything from universal childcare to green energy to “economic patriotism.” But on health care, so far, the senator has been content to endorse Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All plan, which would eliminate most private health insurance and set up a government-run health insurance system, without putting forth one of her own.

The Sanders plan would, according to Sanders himself as well as multiple independent estimates, require new government spending totaling somewhere between $30 and $40 trillion a year. While Sanders has outlined ways to offset some of that cost, he hasn’t put forth a plan to fully finance the additional spending. He has, however, made clear that it would require higher taxes on the middle class.

Ex-NFL linebacker poised to return to Congress after Texas runoff win with Jasmine Crockett endorsement

Trump-backed Air Force veteran wins GOP runoff in newly-redistricted House district

U.S. military kills alleged narco-terrorist in lethal strike on drug-trafficking vessel in Eastern Pacific

Pam Bondi to make Trump administration return after undisclosed thyroid cancer battle

Texas Railroad Commissioner Jim Wright and wife share story of 2017 crash that left her permanently paralyzed

Controversial Democrat who called for ‘Zionists’ to be imprisoned toppled after backlash

Breaking: Longtime Democrat Rep. Al Green Has Been Defeated, Will Lose His Seat in Congress

Texas MAGA battle ends with Middleton victory as Chip Roy falls short in AG Race

BREAKING: Ken Paxton Has Defeated John Cornyn in the TX GOP Senate Primary

Watch: RFK Jr. Catches Two Snakes on Dr. Oz’s Patio Using Only His Bare Hands

Spencer Pratt Accuses LA Mayor Karen Bass of Breaking Election Law on Camera

GOP veteran defeats populist candidate in one of America’s most conservative districts

MAGA triumph: Trump ally Ken Paxton defeats John Cornyn in bitter Texas GOP primary war

We Could Cover 10 Percent of the Entire Deficit if Gov’t Stopped Accidentally Making Improper Payments

Owner of Trump House Who Was Brutally Beaten Has Died – Wife Believes Politics Motivated Murder

But despite endorsing Sanders’ plan, Warren has repeatedly declined to say that middle-class taxes would have to go up. She dodged the question in earlier debates this year. And at the debate last night, she once again all but refused to answer the question directly.

Instead, she offered a vague promise that “middle-class families are going to pay less” while insisting that “those at the very top—the richest individuals and the biggest corporations—are going to pay more.”

When a debate moderator pressed her specifically on the question of taxes, she still declined to offer a direct response. Families have to deal with “total cost,” she said, reiterating her support for Medicare for All. “Costs are going to go up for wealthier individuals, and costs are going to go up for giant corporations. But for hard-working families across this country, costs are going to go down, and that’s how it should work under Medicare for All in our health care system.” The specific question—Would taxes rise for middle-class families?—remained unanswered.

In part, this is a sign that Warren, though running what is nominally a bold progressive campaign, has adopted the conventional Democratic playbook when it comes to tax hikes. As Russell Berman writes at The Atlantic, in recent years the party’s presidential candidates have tended to adhere to the rule that it’s OK to propose raising taxes on the rich—but not on the broadly defined middle class.