Elizabeth Warren Doesn’t Want to Say How She’d Pay for Her Health Care Plan

Elizabeth Warren famously has a plan for everything—everything, that is, except financing the single-payer health care system she says she supports. It’s a telling omission that reveals what happens when Warren’s wonky tendencies come into conflict with her campaign mantras.

Since launching her presidential campaign, the Massachusetts Democrat has rolled out Warren-branded plans for everything from universal childcare to green energy to “economic patriotism.” But on health care, so far, the senator has been content to endorse Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All plan, which would eliminate most private health insurance and set up a government-run health insurance system, without putting forth one of her own.

The Sanders plan would, according to Sanders himself as well as multiple independent estimates, require new government spending totaling somewhere between $30 and $40 trillion a year. While Sanders has outlined ways to offset some of that cost, he hasn’t put forth a plan to fully finance the additional spending. He has, however, made clear that it would require higher taxes on the middle class.

Trump celebrates after UN climate committee moves away from its most extreme global warming scenario

Trump scores major Republican primary victory as Cassidy ousted in Louisiana

Maduro’s alleged ‘bag man’ Alex Saab arrested less than 3 years after Biden pardon: report

Massachusetts governor asks US Navy to help retrieve bodies, evidence from sunken fishing vessel

Trump shares stunning photos of Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool renovation, says project is ahead of schedule

Suspected drunk driver kills 2 pedestrians in violent chain-reaction crash on Manhattan’s Upper West Side

Breaking: US Makes ‘Intense Preparations’ for Impending Iran Attacks as Trump Sends Warning

US Attorney Pirro Lays Down Law: Parents Need to Stop ‘Teen Takeovers’ or Face Jail

We Were Right: 13 Heads Roll as DC Police’s Conspiracy to Deceive Public on Astronomical Crime Rates Exposed

Pope Leo does ‘6-7’ trend for children at the Vatican

Violent Repeat Offender Left Psych Ward Days Before Allegedly Shooting Up Busy Massachusetts Street

Second FDA executive departing organization in less than a week as top drug regulator claims she was fired

Largest children’s hospital in US to open ‘detransition clinic’ after $10M settlement with Trump DOJ, state

Major Thermos Product Recalled After Causing Vision Loss in Three People

ActBlue CEO faces June 10 grilling after fundraising powerhouse allegedly misled Congress on foreign donations

But despite endorsing Sanders’ plan, Warren has repeatedly declined to say that middle-class taxes would have to go up. She dodged the question in earlier debates this year. And at the debate last night, she once again all but refused to answer the question directly.

Instead, she offered a vague promise that “middle-class families are going to pay less” while insisting that “those at the very top—the richest individuals and the biggest corporations—are going to pay more.”

When a debate moderator pressed her specifically on the question of taxes, she still declined to offer a direct response. Families have to deal with “total cost,” she said, reiterating her support for Medicare for All. “Costs are going to go up for wealthier individuals, and costs are going to go up for giant corporations. But for hard-working families across this country, costs are going to go down, and that’s how it should work under Medicare for All in our health care system.” The specific question—Would taxes rise for middle-class families?—remained unanswered.

In part, this is a sign that Warren, though running what is nominally a bold progressive campaign, has adopted the conventional Democratic playbook when it comes to tax hikes. As Russell Berman writes at The Atlantic, in recent years the party’s presidential candidates have tended to adhere to the rule that it’s OK to propose raising taxes on the rich—but not on the broadly defined middle class.