Elizabeth Warren Doesn’t Want to Say How She’d Pay for Her Health Care Plan

Elizabeth Warren famously has a plan for everything—everything, that is, except financing the single-payer health care system she says she supports. It’s a telling omission that reveals what happens when Warren’s wonky tendencies come into conflict with her campaign mantras.

Since launching her presidential campaign, the Massachusetts Democrat has rolled out Warren-branded plans for everything from universal childcare to green energy to “economic patriotism.” But on health care, so far, the senator has been content to endorse Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All plan, which would eliminate most private health insurance and set up a government-run health insurance system, without putting forth one of her own.

The Sanders plan would, according to Sanders himself as well as multiple independent estimates, require new government spending totaling somewhere between $30 and $40 trillion a year. While Sanders has outlined ways to offset some of that cost, he hasn’t put forth a plan to fully finance the additional spending. He has, however, made clear that it would require higher taxes on the middle class.

Cole Allen concedes to stay in jail ahead of Trump assassination attempt trial

Trump was ‘one door away’ from danger, GOP lawmakers says as he demands Secret Service explanation

Crockett ripped for latest ‘low IQ’ jab at paralyzed Texas governor following ‘Hot Wheels’ fallout

After seven years, the first commercial flight from US to Venezuela takes off

Trump warns Merz to stop ‘interfering’ on Iran, focus on ‘broken’ Germany

Hegseth Takes House Dem to the Woodshed for Pushing Iranian ‘Propaganda’ at Hearing: ‘Shame on You!’

Minnesota ‘tried to cover up fraud allegations,’ former state trooper alleges

Class and Decency: Watch Johnny Carson Address Reagan Assassination Attempt the Day After It Happened

Bodycam shows dad bolt from cops with young child in his arms before ditching her alone in the woods

Trump DOJ report lays bare Biden administration’s alleged anti-Christian bias

WATCH: Chaos erupts as Florida Dem in pink jumpsuit grabs bullhorn mid-vote: ‘It’s illegal!’

Dem Rep Who Resigned in Disgrace Over Federal Charges Quietly Made Move to Run Again Before Quitting: Reports

David Allan Coe, Outlaw Country Legend Behind ‘Take This Job and Shove It,’ Dies at 86

Biden IRS discriminated against Christian groups, DOJ report finds

Federal appeals court refuses to rehear Trump appeal of $83M E Jean Carroll defamation judgment

But despite endorsing Sanders’ plan, Warren has repeatedly declined to say that middle-class taxes would have to go up. She dodged the question in earlier debates this year. And at the debate last night, she once again all but refused to answer the question directly.

Instead, she offered a vague promise that “middle-class families are going to pay less” while insisting that “those at the very top—the richest individuals and the biggest corporations—are going to pay more.”

When a debate moderator pressed her specifically on the question of taxes, she still declined to offer a direct response. Families have to deal with “total cost,” she said, reiterating her support for Medicare for All. “Costs are going to go up for wealthier individuals, and costs are going to go up for giant corporations. But for hard-working families across this country, costs are going to go down, and that’s how it should work under Medicare for All in our health care system.” The specific question—Would taxes rise for middle-class families?—remained unanswered.

In part, this is a sign that Warren, though running what is nominally a bold progressive campaign, has adopted the conventional Democratic playbook when it comes to tax hikes. As Russell Berman writes at The Atlantic, in recent years the party’s presidential candidates have tended to adhere to the rule that it’s OK to propose raising taxes on the rich—but not on the broadly defined middle class.