Elizabeth Warren Doesn’t Want to Say How She’d Pay for Her Health Care Plan

Elizabeth Warren famously has a plan for everything—everything, that is, except financing the single-payer health care system she says she supports. It’s a telling omission that reveals what happens when Warren’s wonky tendencies come into conflict with her campaign mantras.

Since launching her presidential campaign, the Massachusetts Democrat has rolled out Warren-branded plans for everything from universal childcare to green energy to “economic patriotism.” But on health care, so far, the senator has been content to endorse Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All plan, which would eliminate most private health insurance and set up a government-run health insurance system, without putting forth one of her own.

The Sanders plan would, according to Sanders himself as well as multiple independent estimates, require new government spending totaling somewhere between $30 and $40 trillion a year. While Sanders has outlined ways to offset some of that cost, he hasn’t put forth a plan to fully finance the additional spending. He has, however, made clear that it would require higher taxes on the middle class.

Cancel Culture Comes for Halloween: School Cancels Parades for ‘Inclusivity’

Watch: SNL’s Michael Che Refuses to Cave to Woke Mob as Interviewer Nags Him About Shane Gillis’ Gym Clothes Joke

Kid Rock Opens Up About What Inspired His New Gospel Album, and It’s Quite the Story

Ukraine drone strikes and Iran war split blame on skyrocketing diesel prices

CBS Tried to Trash Trump Again, Now They’re Facing Another Multimillion Suit, This Time from a 15-Year-Old They Trashed

Tish James confronted on camera over Trump’s accusation of bias in Cornell rape case

Democrats’ latest gun-control push runs into inconvenient fact about how school killer was stopped

Obama’s star power gets a reality check from Black voters in crucial Senate race: ‘It’s a turn-off’

Trump says he doesn’t know who ordered Starshield throttle in Ukraine

Biden judge rejects Obama CIA chief’s legal bid against Trump over one key problem

Bryan Kohberger fights to remove judge who called him ‘worst of the worst,’ questioned his honesty

Former University of Kentucky cheerleader sentenced to 10 years in prison for infant’s death

Watch: Dem Nominee Troy Jackson Tells Sen. Susan Collins to ‘Shut Up’ as Heckler Causes Debate Chaos

Breaking: Katie Zacharia Out as White House Press Secretary

Black civic group blasts Talarico campaign over canceled event: ‘Deeply disappointed’

But despite endorsing Sanders’ plan, Warren has repeatedly declined to say that middle-class taxes would have to go up. She dodged the question in earlier debates this year. And at the debate last night, she once again all but refused to answer the question directly.

Instead, she offered a vague promise that “middle-class families are going to pay less” while insisting that “those at the very top—the richest individuals and the biggest corporations—are going to pay more.”

When a debate moderator pressed her specifically on the question of taxes, she still declined to offer a direct response. Families have to deal with “total cost,” she said, reiterating her support for Medicare for All. “Costs are going to go up for wealthier individuals, and costs are going to go up for giant corporations. But for hard-working families across this country, costs are going to go down, and that’s how it should work under Medicare for All in our health care system.” The specific question—Would taxes rise for middle-class families?—remained unanswered.

In part, this is a sign that Warren, though running what is nominally a bold progressive campaign, has adopted the conventional Democratic playbook when it comes to tax hikes. As Russell Berman writes at The Atlantic, in recent years the party’s presidential candidates have tended to adhere to the rule that it’s OK to propose raising taxes on the rich—but not on the broadly defined middle class.