Elizabeth Warren Doesn’t Want to Say How She’d Pay for Her Health Care Plan

Elizabeth Warren famously has a plan for everything—everything, that is, except financing the single-payer health care system she says she supports. It’s a telling omission that reveals what happens when Warren’s wonky tendencies come into conflict with her campaign mantras.

Since launching her presidential campaign, the Massachusetts Democrat has rolled out Warren-branded plans for everything from universal childcare to green energy to “economic patriotism.” But on health care, so far, the senator has been content to endorse Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All plan, which would eliminate most private health insurance and set up a government-run health insurance system, without putting forth one of her own.

The Sanders plan would, according to Sanders himself as well as multiple independent estimates, require new government spending totaling somewhere between $30 and $40 trillion a year. While Sanders has outlined ways to offset some of that cost, he hasn’t put forth a plan to fully finance the additional spending. He has, however, made clear that it would require higher taxes on the middle class.

Iran may have killed over 30,000 protesters in two days: Report

Dems silent on Minnesota church disruption after pressing Bondi to use FACE Act on pro-lifers

Carney pushes back on Trump’s 100% tariff threat over China trade deals with Canada amid tensions

Here Are the Worst Countries on Earth for Christian Persecution

Texas cult in crosshairs of killer mom’s bathtub slayings case as questions hang over family horror

Popular Potato Product Faces Recall in 26 States

Can Trump Really Denaturalize Somalis En Masse?

Tim Walz Was the Most Scandal-Plagued Governor Running in 2026: Katie Hobbs Just Stole That Title

Mamdani announces remote school day due to dangerous winter storm conditions

GOP lawmaker renews oversight hearing request of DHS agencies following fatal shooting in Minneapolis

Meet the longtime biz partner of Ilhan Omar’s husband as questions swirl over her skyrocketing net worth

Anti-ICE Church Harasser Posted Profane, Ranting Video Before Arrest, Called to ‘Shut This Country Down’

Minnesota school board member Chauntyll Allen ripped by state lawmaker after anti-ICE church invasion arrest

ACLU seeks reinstated constraints on federal officers in Minnesota after Alex Pretti shooting

Narratives clash after Trump and victim’s family react to second Minneapolis ICE shooting

But despite endorsing Sanders’ plan, Warren has repeatedly declined to say that middle-class taxes would have to go up. She dodged the question in earlier debates this year. And at the debate last night, she once again all but refused to answer the question directly.

Instead, she offered a vague promise that “middle-class families are going to pay less” while insisting that “those at the very top—the richest individuals and the biggest corporations—are going to pay more.”

When a debate moderator pressed her specifically on the question of taxes, she still declined to offer a direct response. Families have to deal with “total cost,” she said, reiterating her support for Medicare for All. “Costs are going to go up for wealthier individuals, and costs are going to go up for giant corporations. But for hard-working families across this country, costs are going to go down, and that’s how it should work under Medicare for All in our health care system.” The specific question—Would taxes rise for middle-class families?—remained unanswered.

In part, this is a sign that Warren, though running what is nominally a bold progressive campaign, has adopted the conventional Democratic playbook when it comes to tax hikes. As Russell Berman writes at The Atlantic, in recent years the party’s presidential candidates have tended to adhere to the rule that it’s OK to propose raising taxes on the rich—but not on the broadly defined middle class.