Elizabeth Warren famously has a plan for everything—everything, that is, except financing the single-payer health care system she says she supports. It’s a telling omission that reveals what happens when Warren’s wonky tendencies come into conflict with her campaign mantras.
Since launching her presidential campaign, the Massachusetts Democrat has rolled out Warren-branded plans for everything from universal childcare to green energy to “economic patriotism.” But on health care, so far, the senator has been content to endorse Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All plan, which would eliminate most private health insurance and set up a government-run health insurance system, without putting forth one of her own.
The Sanders plan would, according to Sanders himself as well as multiple independent estimates, require new government spending totaling somewhere between $30 and $40 trillion a year. While Sanders has outlined ways to offset some of that cost, he hasn’t put forth a plan to fully finance the additional spending. He has, however, made clear that it would require higher taxes on the middle class.
Bolsonaro declares himself ‘leader’ of Brazil after fleeing country, arriving in Miami
Judge rejects DOJ request to block California from immediately counting ballots linked to alleged noncitizens
Fiance of Dem Who Lost to El-Sayed in Close Primary Announces He’s Voting For His GOP Challenger Because of Anti-Semitism, Libs Flip
Is Hasan Piker Disenfranchising Blacks? You Have To Show ID to Get Into Terror-Supporting Commie’s Events, After All
Thune goes all-in on campaign trail as Schumer stays on bench, faces rejection from fellow Dems
DHS investigates massive data breach exposing 40,000 employees, including ICE and Border Patrol agents
Haley Stevens’s Democratic fiance backs Mike Rogers, says el Sayed imperils Jewish community
MAHA heavyweights try to put Lahn over the top in Iowa governor’s race
Mamdani Keeps Taking Over NYPD Training Facility for Personal Use, and Police Union Officials Are Furious
Bill Gates Claims Artifical Intelligence Will Force Some to Choose an ‘Amish’ Lifestyle
Watch: Anti-ICE Protesters Accidentally Infuriate Immigrants While Blocking Brooklyn Bridge
Emergency declared at South Carolina nuclear site after fire erupts at lab
Conservative Journalists James O’Keefe and Cam Higby Indicted in Minnesota After Exposing Election System in Undercover Video
Legendary Sports Announcer Who Used Platform to Honor God Announces Departure
Alaska Dems Spent Months Finding a Duplicate ‘Dan Sullivan’ to Confuse GOP Voters Ahead of Senate Race
But despite endorsing Sanders’ plan, Warren has repeatedly declined to say that middle-class taxes would have to go up. She dodged the question in earlier debates this year. And at the debate last night, she once again all but refused to answer the question directly.
Instead, she offered a vague promise that “middle-class families are going to pay less” while insisting that “those at the very top—the richest individuals and the biggest corporations—are going to pay more.”
When a debate moderator pressed her specifically on the question of taxes, she still declined to offer a direct response. Families have to deal with “total cost,” she said, reiterating her support for Medicare for All. “Costs are going to go up for wealthier individuals, and costs are going to go up for giant corporations. But for hard-working families across this country, costs are going to go down, and that’s how it should work under Medicare for All in our health care system.” The specific question—Would taxes rise for middle-class families?—remained unanswered.
In part, this is a sign that Warren, though running what is nominally a bold progressive campaign, has adopted the conventional Democratic playbook when it comes to tax hikes. As Russell Berman writes at The Atlantic, in recent years the party’s presidential candidates have tended to adhere to the rule that it’s OK to propose raising taxes on the rich—but not on the broadly defined middle class.
Bolsonaro declares himself ‘leader’ of Brazil after fleeing country, arriving in Miami
Judge rejects DOJ request to block California from immediately counting ballots linked to alleged noncitizens
Fiance of Dem Who Lost to El-Sayed in Close Primary Announces He’s Voting For His GOP Challenger Because of Anti-Semitism, Libs Flip
Is Hasan Piker Disenfranchising Blacks? You Have To Show ID to Get Into Terror-Supporting Commie’s Events, After All
Thune goes all-in on campaign trail as Schumer stays on bench, faces rejection from fellow Dems
DHS investigates massive data breach exposing 40,000 employees, including ICE and Border Patrol agents
Haley Stevens’s Democratic fiance backs Mike Rogers, says el Sayed imperils Jewish community
MAHA heavyweights try to put Lahn over the top in Iowa governor’s race
Mamdani Keeps Taking Over NYPD Training Facility for Personal Use, and Police Union Officials Are Furious
Bill Gates Claims Artifical Intelligence Will Force Some to Choose an ‘Amish’ Lifestyle
Watch: Anti-ICE Protesters Accidentally Infuriate Immigrants While Blocking Brooklyn Bridge
Emergency declared at South Carolina nuclear site after fire erupts at lab
Conservative Journalists James O’Keefe and Cam Higby Indicted in Minnesota After Exposing Election System in Undercover Video
Legendary Sports Announcer Who Used Platform to Honor God Announces Departure
Alaska Dems Spent Months Finding a Duplicate ‘Dan Sullivan’ to Confuse GOP Voters Ahead of Senate Race
But it’s also a result of the way that Warren has framed her campaign as a kind of populist uprising, one that pits the middle class against the upper crust. Warren’s entire presidential bid, and much of her career as a public figure, is predicated on the notion that her plans will come at no cost to ordinary families and that the costs of her plans will be born solely by the richest of the rich.
This is the story that Warren tells every day. It is the foundation of her presidential bid, and she is apparently unable or unwilling to deviate from it, even when the facts indicate otherwise.
There is little question that Medicare for All would require higher taxes on the middle class. But to admit that would muddle her easy populist narrative, so she goes out of her way to avoid making that admission. As is so often the case for Warren, the simple story is more important than the plain truth.
Story cited here.
