Elizabeth Warren famously has a plan for everything—everything, that is, except financing the single-payer health care system she says she supports. It’s a telling omission that reveals what happens when Warren’s wonky tendencies come into conflict with her campaign mantras.
Since launching her presidential campaign, the Massachusetts Democrat has rolled out Warren-branded plans for everything from universal childcare to green energy to “economic patriotism.” But on health care, so far, the senator has been content to endorse Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All plan, which would eliminate most private health insurance and set up a government-run health insurance system, without putting forth one of her own.
The Sanders plan would, according to Sanders himself as well as multiple independent estimates, require new government spending totaling somewhere between $30 and $40 trillion a year. While Sanders has outlined ways to offset some of that cost, he hasn’t put forth a plan to fully finance the additional spending. He has, however, made clear that it would require higher taxes on the middle class.
Dem Deletes X Posts After Trashing State She Is Seeking to Represent
Steak n’ Shake Worker Murdered Over Argument About Onion Rings
School Officer Stops Armed Teenager Before He Enters Building
2 US service members missing in Morocco after multinational military exercise, search underway
Colorado Dems Pass Law Banning Pet Stores from Selling Dogs and Cats
Rubio to visit Italy, Vatican amid troop drawdown call, tension with Trump, Pope Leo: reports
Somali Fraud Is Only a Drop in the Bucket Compared to This Indian Fraud Scheme
Cole Allen’s cross-country train musings show ‘scattered’ mindset of accused would-be Trump killer: expert
Midterm countdown: Democrats lead early, but GOP sees a path through the map
The ballot box showdowns this month that you need to watch
Massive fire destroys University of South Florida laboratory building: ‘Total loss’
War with Iran Poised to Erupt Again After Weeks of Ceasefire If Peace Talks Fail
Car Enthusiast Jerry Seinfeld Blasts EVs: ‘It’s a Big, Stupid Virtue Signal’
Breaking: Iran Peace Proposal Aimed at Ending War Under Trump’s Review – ‘I’m Looking at It’
Student charged after 5 stabbed at high school in violent altercation over vape pen
But despite endorsing Sanders’ plan, Warren has repeatedly declined to say that middle-class taxes would have to go up. She dodged the question in earlier debates this year. And at the debate last night, she once again all but refused to answer the question directly.
Instead, she offered a vague promise that “middle-class families are going to pay less” while insisting that “those at the very top—the richest individuals and the biggest corporations—are going to pay more.”
When a debate moderator pressed her specifically on the question of taxes, she still declined to offer a direct response. Families have to deal with “total cost,” she said, reiterating her support for Medicare for All. “Costs are going to go up for wealthier individuals, and costs are going to go up for giant corporations. But for hard-working families across this country, costs are going to go down, and that’s how it should work under Medicare for All in our health care system.” The specific question—Would taxes rise for middle-class families?—remained unanswered.
In part, this is a sign that Warren, though running what is nominally a bold progressive campaign, has adopted the conventional Democratic playbook when it comes to tax hikes. As Russell Berman writes at The Atlantic, in recent years the party’s presidential candidates have tended to adhere to the rule that it’s OK to propose raising taxes on the rich—but not on the broadly defined middle class.
Dem Deletes X Posts After Trashing State She Is Seeking to Represent
Steak n’ Shake Worker Murdered Over Argument About Onion Rings
School Officer Stops Armed Teenager Before He Enters Building
2 US service members missing in Morocco after multinational military exercise, search underway
Colorado Dems Pass Law Banning Pet Stores from Selling Dogs and Cats
Rubio to visit Italy, Vatican amid troop drawdown call, tension with Trump, Pope Leo: reports
Somali Fraud Is Only a Drop in the Bucket Compared to This Indian Fraud Scheme
Cole Allen’s cross-country train musings show ‘scattered’ mindset of accused would-be Trump killer: expert
Midterm countdown: Democrats lead early, but GOP sees a path through the map
The ballot box showdowns this month that you need to watch
Massive fire destroys University of South Florida laboratory building: ‘Total loss’
War with Iran Poised to Erupt Again After Weeks of Ceasefire If Peace Talks Fail
Car Enthusiast Jerry Seinfeld Blasts EVs: ‘It’s a Big, Stupid Virtue Signal’
Breaking: Iran Peace Proposal Aimed at Ending War Under Trump’s Review – ‘I’m Looking at It’
Student charged after 5 stabbed at high school in violent altercation over vape pen
But it’s also a result of the way that Warren has framed her campaign as a kind of populist uprising, one that pits the middle class against the upper crust. Warren’s entire presidential bid, and much of her career as a public figure, is predicated on the notion that her plans will come at no cost to ordinary families and that the costs of her plans will be born solely by the richest of the rich.
This is the story that Warren tells every day. It is the foundation of her presidential bid, and she is apparently unable or unwilling to deviate from it, even when the facts indicate otherwise.
There is little question that Medicare for All would require higher taxes on the middle class. But to admit that would muddle her easy populist narrative, so she goes out of her way to avoid making that admission. As is so often the case for Warren, the simple story is more important than the plain truth.
Story cited here.
