Elizabeth Warren Doesn’t Want to Say How She’d Pay for Her Health Care Plan

Elizabeth Warren famously has a plan for everything—everything, that is, except financing the single-payer health care system she says she supports. It’s a telling omission that reveals what happens when Warren’s wonky tendencies come into conflict with her campaign mantras.

Since launching her presidential campaign, the Massachusetts Democrat has rolled out Warren-branded plans for everything from universal childcare to green energy to “economic patriotism.” But on health care, so far, the senator has been content to endorse Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All plan, which would eliminate most private health insurance and set up a government-run health insurance system, without putting forth one of her own.

The Sanders plan would, according to Sanders himself as well as multiple independent estimates, require new government spending totaling somewhere between $30 and $40 trillion a year. While Sanders has outlined ways to offset some of that cost, he hasn’t put forth a plan to fully finance the additional spending. He has, however, made clear that it would require higher taxes on the middle class.

Pope Leo sends unmistakable message on immigrants during visit honoring America’s first saint

Former Olympian among those charged with vandalizing Reflecting Pool; Trump says basin must be drained: report

Obama Presidential Center follows widely-mocked ‘stolen land’ acknowledgment with Native American dance show

Manhunt underway for Kansas City shooting spree suspect near World Cup venue; FBI offering $25K reward

US Park Police arrest former Olympian for vandalism of Reflecting Pool

Obama Center embeds ‘Indigenous’ land message on controversial site

Dem who sued to remove Trump’s name from Kennedy Center now says venue becoming ‘lifeless husk’ in fresh fight

Biden scores temporary court victory as Trump-appointed judge delays release of Hur investigation materials

Breaking: Iran Closes Strait of Hormuz, Threatens End to Peace Talks

Soccer Fan Accuses Israel of Killing Palestinian Team, Pathetically Falls Apart After Learning Palestinians Slaughtered Israeli Team in 1972

Trump blames ABC reporter and vandals for peeling Reflecting Pool and algae growth

Revamped Reflecting Pool Damaged by ‘Radical Left Lunatics,’ Trump Says

Texas Surges Past California in Key Sign of Business Influence

Trump says Meloni ‘wants to be friends again’ after Italy refused to help US amid Iran war

Vance says ‘United States wins either way’ as he defends Trump’s Iran deal against GOP skeptics

But despite endorsing Sanders’ plan, Warren has repeatedly declined to say that middle-class taxes would have to go up. She dodged the question in earlier debates this year. And at the debate last night, she once again all but refused to answer the question directly.

Instead, she offered a vague promise that “middle-class families are going to pay less” while insisting that “those at the very top—the richest individuals and the biggest corporations—are going to pay more.”

When a debate moderator pressed her specifically on the question of taxes, she still declined to offer a direct response. Families have to deal with “total cost,” she said, reiterating her support for Medicare for All. “Costs are going to go up for wealthier individuals, and costs are going to go up for giant corporations. But for hard-working families across this country, costs are going to go down, and that’s how it should work under Medicare for All in our health care system.” The specific question—Would taxes rise for middle-class families?—remained unanswered.

In part, this is a sign that Warren, though running what is nominally a bold progressive campaign, has adopted the conventional Democratic playbook when it comes to tax hikes. As Russell Berman writes at The Atlantic, in recent years the party’s presidential candidates have tended to adhere to the rule that it’s OK to propose raising taxes on the rich—but not on the broadly defined middle class.