Elizabeth Warren famously has a plan for everything—everything, that is, except financing the single-payer health care system she says she supports. It’s a telling omission that reveals what happens when Warren’s wonky tendencies come into conflict with her campaign mantras.
Since launching her presidential campaign, the Massachusetts Democrat has rolled out Warren-branded plans for everything from universal childcare to green energy to “economic patriotism.” But on health care, so far, the senator has been content to endorse Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All plan, which would eliminate most private health insurance and set up a government-run health insurance system, without putting forth one of her own.
The Sanders plan would, according to Sanders himself as well as multiple independent estimates, require new government spending totaling somewhere between $30 and $40 trillion a year. While Sanders has outlined ways to offset some of that cost, he hasn’t put forth a plan to fully finance the additional spending. He has, however, made clear that it would require higher taxes on the middle class.
VA Woman Allegedly Stabbed to Death by Illegal with 30+ Arrests Just Before VA Gov Demonized ICE in SOTU Response
BREAKING: Trump Announces ‘Major Combat Operations’ Against Iran: ‘A Vicious Group of Very Hard, Terrible People’
‘America’s Most Wanted’ co-host Callahan Walsh reveals what ‘sticks out’ to him in Nancy Guthrie case
Fetterman praises Operation Epic Fury: Trump is ‘willing to do what’s right’
Trump tells Iranians the ‘hour of your freedom is at hand’ as US-Israel launch strikes against Iran
Trump and Vance turn over ‘new leaf’ with Zelensky one year since Oval Office clash
Cassidy’s crossroads: Trump nominee presents latest challenge for GOP senator
GOING BROKE? The Washington Post Is Bleeding Money, With Losses Exceeding $100 Million in 2025
Poll: America’s Support for Israel Plunges as More Independents and Democrats Sympathize with Palestinians
China’s all-out campaign against Japan includes AI warfare, blacklists, and WWII grievances
US and Israel launch ‘preemptive’ attack against Iran
WATCH: Dem lawmaker makes surprising admission about border as others trash Trump’s SOTU ‘lies’
BREAKING REPORT: Israel Strikes Iran, US Involved
Richard Cox derails sex offender case, once again
North Carolina woman arrested nearly 50 years after baby found dead in trash bag at landfill
But despite endorsing Sanders’ plan, Warren has repeatedly declined to say that middle-class taxes would have to go up. She dodged the question in earlier debates this year. And at the debate last night, she once again all but refused to answer the question directly.
Instead, she offered a vague promise that “middle-class families are going to pay less” while insisting that “those at the very top—the richest individuals and the biggest corporations—are going to pay more.”
When a debate moderator pressed her specifically on the question of taxes, she still declined to offer a direct response. Families have to deal with “total cost,” she said, reiterating her support for Medicare for All. “Costs are going to go up for wealthier individuals, and costs are going to go up for giant corporations. But for hard-working families across this country, costs are going to go down, and that’s how it should work under Medicare for All in our health care system.” The specific question—Would taxes rise for middle-class families?—remained unanswered.
In part, this is a sign that Warren, though running what is nominally a bold progressive campaign, has adopted the conventional Democratic playbook when it comes to tax hikes. As Russell Berman writes at The Atlantic, in recent years the party’s presidential candidates have tended to adhere to the rule that it’s OK to propose raising taxes on the rich—but not on the broadly defined middle class.
VA Woman Allegedly Stabbed to Death by Illegal with 30+ Arrests Just Before VA Gov Demonized ICE in SOTU Response
BREAKING: Trump Announces ‘Major Combat Operations’ Against Iran: ‘A Vicious Group of Very Hard, Terrible People’
‘America’s Most Wanted’ co-host Callahan Walsh reveals what ‘sticks out’ to him in Nancy Guthrie case
Fetterman praises Operation Epic Fury: Trump is ‘willing to do what’s right’
Trump tells Iranians the ‘hour of your freedom is at hand’ as US-Israel launch strikes against Iran
Trump and Vance turn over ‘new leaf’ with Zelensky one year since Oval Office clash
Cassidy’s crossroads: Trump nominee presents latest challenge for GOP senator
GOING BROKE? The Washington Post Is Bleeding Money, With Losses Exceeding $100 Million in 2025
Poll: America’s Support for Israel Plunges as More Independents and Democrats Sympathize with Palestinians
China’s all-out campaign against Japan includes AI warfare, blacklists, and WWII grievances
US and Israel launch ‘preemptive’ attack against Iran
WATCH: Dem lawmaker makes surprising admission about border as others trash Trump’s SOTU ‘lies’
BREAKING REPORT: Israel Strikes Iran, US Involved
Richard Cox derails sex offender case, once again
North Carolina woman arrested nearly 50 years after baby found dead in trash bag at landfill
But it’s also a result of the way that Warren has framed her campaign as a kind of populist uprising, one that pits the middle class against the upper crust. Warren’s entire presidential bid, and much of her career as a public figure, is predicated on the notion that her plans will come at no cost to ordinary families and that the costs of her plans will be born solely by the richest of the rich.
This is the story that Warren tells every day. It is the foundation of her presidential bid, and she is apparently unable or unwilling to deviate from it, even when the facts indicate otherwise.
There is little question that Medicare for All would require higher taxes on the middle class. But to admit that would muddle her easy populist narrative, so she goes out of her way to avoid making that admission. As is so often the case for Warren, the simple story is more important than the plain truth.
Story cited here.
