Elizabeth Warren Doesn’t Want to Say How She’d Pay for Her Health Care Plan

Elizabeth Warren famously has a plan for everything—everything, that is, except financing the single-payer health care system she says she supports. It’s a telling omission that reveals what happens when Warren’s wonky tendencies come into conflict with her campaign mantras.

Since launching her presidential campaign, the Massachusetts Democrat has rolled out Warren-branded plans for everything from universal childcare to green energy to “economic patriotism.” But on health care, so far, the senator has been content to endorse Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All plan, which would eliminate most private health insurance and set up a government-run health insurance system, without putting forth one of her own.

The Sanders plan would, according to Sanders himself as well as multiple independent estimates, require new government spending totaling somewhere between $30 and $40 trillion a year. While Sanders has outlined ways to offset some of that cost, he hasn’t put forth a plan to fully finance the additional spending. He has, however, made clear that it would require higher taxes on the middle class.

Driver passed out as self-driving car kept moving—police find more than a medical emergency inside

Johnson accuses Democrats of taking government hostage over ‘crazy’ immigration agenda

Mamdani endorses planned NYC ‘No Kings’ rally, derides ICE as ‘rogue agency’

Secret Service Agent Shoots Himself While Working on Jill Biden’s Detail

Fox News True Crime Newsletter: ‘Lovers’ Lane’ breakthrough, Gilgo Beach suspect’s plea, Jimmy Gracey’s ruling

Mike Johnson splits from Thune with eight-week DHS funding bill

Hollywood Star Sounds Off About Celeb Politics: You Make ‘Half Your Audience Despise You’

Trump will ask Congress to pass additional farm relief amid Iran war price spikes

Judge freezes Trump admin move against AI firm, fueling battle over security authority

Greg Bovino is writing a book to ‘memorialize’ the Border Patrol officers on the front lines of Trump’s deportation operation

‘Ship has sailed’: This is what Dems won’t get in DHS deal after shunning GOP

Watch: Trump Roasts Fox News Polls While Live on the Network, Calls for Co-Host’s Removal

Hackers tied to Iran breach FBI director’s personal email and post private images

WATCH: Scalise’s Staff Found the DHS Quote Hakeem Jeffries Hoped Was Gone Forever, Now Scalise Is on the Floor Reading It to the Whole World

Secret Service agent assigned to Jill Biden injured in ‘negligent discharge’ at Philadelphia airport

But despite endorsing Sanders’ plan, Warren has repeatedly declined to say that middle-class taxes would have to go up. She dodged the question in earlier debates this year. And at the debate last night, she once again all but refused to answer the question directly.

Instead, she offered a vague promise that “middle-class families are going to pay less” while insisting that “those at the very top—the richest individuals and the biggest corporations—are going to pay more.”

When a debate moderator pressed her specifically on the question of taxes, she still declined to offer a direct response. Families have to deal with “total cost,” she said, reiterating her support for Medicare for All. “Costs are going to go up for wealthier individuals, and costs are going to go up for giant corporations. But for hard-working families across this country, costs are going to go down, and that’s how it should work under Medicare for All in our health care system.” The specific question—Would taxes rise for middle-class families?—remained unanswered.

In part, this is a sign that Warren, though running what is nominally a bold progressive campaign, has adopted the conventional Democratic playbook when it comes to tax hikes. As Russell Berman writes at The Atlantic, in recent years the party’s presidential candidates have tended to adhere to the rule that it’s OK to propose raising taxes on the rich—but not on the broadly defined middle class.