Elizabeth Warren Doesn’t Want to Say How She’d Pay for Her Health Care Plan

Elizabeth Warren famously has a plan for everything—everything, that is, except financing the single-payer health care system she says she supports. It’s a telling omission that reveals what happens when Warren’s wonky tendencies come into conflict with her campaign mantras.

Since launching her presidential campaign, the Massachusetts Democrat has rolled out Warren-branded plans for everything from universal childcare to green energy to “economic patriotism.” But on health care, so far, the senator has been content to endorse Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All plan, which would eliminate most private health insurance and set up a government-run health insurance system, without putting forth one of her own.

The Sanders plan would, according to Sanders himself as well as multiple independent estimates, require new government spending totaling somewhere between $30 and $40 trillion a year. While Sanders has outlined ways to offset some of that cost, he hasn’t put forth a plan to fully finance the additional spending. He has, however, made clear that it would require higher taxes on the middle class.

New Trump admin envoy says US won’t ‘conquer’ Greenland, emphasizes talks with locals as Denmark balks at move

FBI violent crime arrests double in Trump’s first year compared to Biden record: ‘Massive strides’

Trump admin sues Illinois Gov. Pritzker over laws shielding migrants from courthouse arrests

Trump to deploy 350 National Guard troops to New Orleans in crime crackdown

PA man charged with attempting to make weapons of mass destruction after neighbor tip

Developing: Mass Casualty Event Declared at Pennsylvania Nursing Home After Suspected Gas Explosion – Please Pray

4 indicted in foiled New Year’s Eve terror bombing plot targeting Southern California businesses

Breaking: FBI Confirms Epstein Letter to Larry Nassar Implicating Trump Is a Complete Fake

Texts after Anna Kepner’s mysterious cruise ship death show family scrambling to clamp down on info

Blue City Paradise: Seattle Woman, 75, Now Partially Blind After Board with Screw Protruding Was Slammed Into Her Head – Suspect Arrested 8 Times in 2025 Alone

Christmastime ICE Operation ‘Angel’s Honor’ nets child rapist, torturer

Proceedings paused against ‘Zizian’ murder suspect following competency claims

Florida Woman Arrested, Accused of Executing Both of Her Ex-Husbands on the Same Day

Stacy Garrity’s campaign releases new ominous ad targeting Josh Shapiro

Fox News Politics Newsletter: Boasberg says Trump must provide due process to CECOT migrants

But despite endorsing Sanders’ plan, Warren has repeatedly declined to say that middle-class taxes would have to go up. She dodged the question in earlier debates this year. And at the debate last night, she once again all but refused to answer the question directly.

Instead, she offered a vague promise that “middle-class families are going to pay less” while insisting that “those at the very top—the richest individuals and the biggest corporations—are going to pay more.”

When a debate moderator pressed her specifically on the question of taxes, she still declined to offer a direct response. Families have to deal with “total cost,” she said, reiterating her support for Medicare for All. “Costs are going to go up for wealthier individuals, and costs are going to go up for giant corporations. But for hard-working families across this country, costs are going to go down, and that’s how it should work under Medicare for All in our health care system.” The specific question—Would taxes rise for middle-class families?—remained unanswered.

In part, this is a sign that Warren, though running what is nominally a bold progressive campaign, has adopted the conventional Democratic playbook when it comes to tax hikes. As Russell Berman writes at The Atlantic, in recent years the party’s presidential candidates have tended to adhere to the rule that it’s OK to propose raising taxes on the rich—but not on the broadly defined middle class.