News Opinons Politics

Dem Rep. Quigley: Hearsay “Can Be Much Better” Evidence Than Direct Evidence

PBS: Rep. Mike Quigley (D-IL) questioned George Kent, deputy assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs, and Bill Taylor, the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine, in the first public hearing in the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump. Quigley pushed back against Republican assertions that the Trump administration’s handling of Ukraine was appropriate and that “hearsay” should not be allowed in the testimony.


WATCH: Controversial SCOTUS decision strikes a divide among lawmakers
Appeals court blocks Trump admin from holding migrants without bond for over 90 days
Judge blocks Philadelphia law targeting masked federal officers
The Democratic socialists are no longer on the fringe
BREAKING: Protester Sets Himself on Fire Outside UN Building in NYC
Massachusetts city imposes curfew ahead of historic World Cup match
Fitness influencer pleads guilty in violent gym attack after beating man with weightlifting belt
Driver charged with manslaughter after Tesla crashes into Texas home, kills grandmother
One Day After Cancelling July 4 Fireworks, Buffalo, NY, Celebrates Somali Independence Day
‘Young Washington’ Delivers Revolutionary Hit for Angel Studios Honoring America’s 250th Birthday
Enter the Downwardly Mobile Anti-Hero Politicians
Iran Halts Negotiations for Days-Long Khamenei Spectacle
Op-Ed: America Is In the Bible – Here’s Why Millions Believe It
Ex-Obama advisor mocked after questioning Chicago’s response to unconscious man: ‘Own a mirror?’
Secret Service missed ‘multiple opportunities’ to prevent Trump assassination attempt: watchdog


REP. MIKE QUIGLEY (D-IL): Mr. Kent, as the day-to-day State Department point person in Washington on Ukraine policy, were you aware of this effort to persuade President Zelensky to issue a statement in order to get a White House meeting while they were happening?

 

KENT: When this exchange happened on August 10, I was not.

QUIGLEY: When did you learn about them?

KENT: As Ambassador Taylor referenced earlier in his testimony in oral answering, he heard on August 16. He then called me, and we had a conversation, and at that point I memorialized my concerns in a note to the file.

QUIGLEY: Ambassador Taylor, as the point person on the ground in Ukraine, were you aware of this effort to get Ukraine to issue this written statement in early August?


WATCH: Controversial SCOTUS decision strikes a divide among lawmakers
Appeals court blocks Trump admin from holding migrants without bond for over 90 days
Judge blocks Philadelphia law targeting masked federal officers
The Democratic socialists are no longer on the fringe
BREAKING: Protester Sets Himself on Fire Outside UN Building in NYC
Massachusetts city imposes curfew ahead of historic World Cup match
Fitness influencer pleads guilty in violent gym attack after beating man with weightlifting belt
Driver charged with manslaughter after Tesla crashes into Texas home, kills grandmother
One Day After Cancelling July 4 Fireworks, Buffalo, NY, Celebrates Somali Independence Day
‘Young Washington’ Delivers Revolutionary Hit for Angel Studios Honoring America’s 250th Birthday
Enter the Downwardly Mobile Anti-Hero Politicians
Iran Halts Negotiations for Days-Long Khamenei Spectacle
Op-Ed: America Is In the Bible – Here’s Why Millions Believe It
Ex-Obama advisor mocked after questioning Chicago’s response to unconscious man: ‘Own a mirror?’
Secret Service missed ‘multiple opportunities’ to prevent Trump assassination attempt: watchdog

TAYLOR: Not the written statement, no, sir.

QUIGLEY: So the entire discussion about a public statement about the two investigations President Trump wanted was done in what you have described as an irregular channel, involving Ambassador Sondland and Volker and the task to take on Ukraine policy by the president. Isn’t that correct, Mr. Kent?

KENT: That would be my understanding.

QUIGLEY: Ambassador?

TAYLOR: The same.

QUIGLEY: And I guess to close primer on hearsay, I think the American public needs to be reminded that countless people have been convicted on hearsay because the courts have routinely allowed and created needed exceptions to hearsay. Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct, as we have learned in painful instances and it’s certainly valid in this instance.

UNKNOWN: Would the gentleman yield? Because none of those exceptions would apply to this testimony.

SCHIFF: This is not the time for colloquy. Mr.–sorry, Representative Stefanik, you are recognized.


WATCH: Controversial SCOTUS decision strikes a divide among lawmakers
Appeals court blocks Trump admin from holding migrants without bond for over 90 days
Judge blocks Philadelphia law targeting masked federal officers
The Democratic socialists are no longer on the fringe
BREAKING: Protester Sets Himself on Fire Outside UN Building in NYC
Massachusetts city imposes curfew ahead of historic World Cup match
Fitness influencer pleads guilty in violent gym attack after beating man with weightlifting belt
Driver charged with manslaughter after Tesla crashes into Texas home, kills grandmother
One Day After Cancelling July 4 Fireworks, Buffalo, NY, Celebrates Somali Independence Day
‘Young Washington’ Delivers Revolutionary Hit for Angel Studios Honoring America’s 250th Birthday
Enter the Downwardly Mobile Anti-Hero Politicians
Iran Halts Negotiations for Days-Long Khamenei Spectacle
Op-Ed: America Is In the Bible – Here’s Why Millions Believe It
Ex-Obama advisor mocked after questioning Chicago’s response to unconscious man: ‘Own a mirror?’
Secret Service missed ‘multiple opportunities’ to prevent Trump assassination attempt: watchdog

STEFANIK: Thank you. For the millions of Americans viewing today, the two most important facts are the following. Number one, Ukraine received the aid. Number two, there was in fact no investigation into Biden. Mr. Kent and Ambassador Taylor, you both spoke eloquently and passionately about the need to support Ukraine to counter Russian aggression, particularly during this very critical time. I agree with you in that assessment. And isn’t it the case that the Trump administration has indeed provided substantially aid to the Ukraine in the form of defense of legal aid, correct?

TAYLOR: That is correct.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter

See also  Road to America 250 starts with Ford: Exhibit at Union Station shows off iconic vehicles