PBS: Rep. Mike Quigley (D-IL) questioned George Kent, deputy assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs, and Bill Taylor, the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine, in the first public hearing in the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump. Quigley pushed back against Republican assertions that the Trump administration’s handling of Ukraine was appropriate and that “hearsay” should not be allowed in the testimony.
Trump claims donor funded White House ballroom includes hidden build below with security focus
Trump dominates CPAC poll as conservatives rally behind agenda, back Iran action
CNN Host Point Blank Asks Hakeem Jeffries If Shutdown Is Purely A Negotiating Tactic
Jaguar Makes Major Marketing Pivot After Woke Ad Disaster
Christian Father May Be Executed by Islamic Country
Passenger bomb threat triggers police response and evacuation on Frontier flight under investigation
DHS criticizes plea deal that could free migrant after guilty plea in teen assault case
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to what to expect on DHS funding when the Senate meets Monday
Bank of America to Pay $72.5M Settlement Over Epstein Lawsuit
Huckabee says Israeli police blocking Palm Sunday service is an ‘overreach’
Vacation rental near Yosemite allegedly used to secretly record guests, 4,000 illegal files found
Tiger Woods’ Friends Admit He ‘Drives Like a Bat Out of Hell Very Often’
How This Archaeological Find Shows the Ancient Link Between Israel and Persia
Scathing report claims nation’s oldest labor union ‘betrayed’ MAGA members through ‘shocking’ spending
Daughter of Air Canada flight attendant ejected from crash provides update, details mother’s injuries
REP. MIKE QUIGLEY (D-IL): Mr. Kent, as the day-to-day State Department point person in Washington on Ukraine policy, were you aware of this effort to persuade President Zelensky to issue a statement in order to get a White House meeting while they were happening?
KENT: When this exchange happened on August 10, I was not.
QUIGLEY: When did you learn about them?
KENT: As Ambassador Taylor referenced earlier in his testimony in oral answering, he heard on August 16. He then called me, and we had a conversation, and at that point I memorialized my concerns in a note to the file.
QUIGLEY: Ambassador Taylor, as the point person on the ground in Ukraine, were you aware of this effort to get Ukraine to issue this written statement in early August?
Trump claims donor funded White House ballroom includes hidden build below with security focus
Trump dominates CPAC poll as conservatives rally behind agenda, back Iran action
CNN Host Point Blank Asks Hakeem Jeffries If Shutdown Is Purely A Negotiating Tactic
Jaguar Makes Major Marketing Pivot After Woke Ad Disaster
Christian Father May Be Executed by Islamic Country
Passenger bomb threat triggers police response and evacuation on Frontier flight under investigation
DHS criticizes plea deal that could free migrant after guilty plea in teen assault case
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to what to expect on DHS funding when the Senate meets Monday
Bank of America to Pay $72.5M Settlement Over Epstein Lawsuit
Huckabee says Israeli police blocking Palm Sunday service is an ‘overreach’
Vacation rental near Yosemite allegedly used to secretly record guests, 4,000 illegal files found
Tiger Woods’ Friends Admit He ‘Drives Like a Bat Out of Hell Very Often’
How This Archaeological Find Shows the Ancient Link Between Israel and Persia
Scathing report claims nation’s oldest labor union ‘betrayed’ MAGA members through ‘shocking’ spending
Daughter of Air Canada flight attendant ejected from crash provides update, details mother’s injuriesTAYLOR: Not the written statement, no, sir.
QUIGLEY: So the entire discussion about a public statement about the two investigations President Trump wanted was done in what you have described as an irregular channel, involving Ambassador Sondland and Volker and the task to take on Ukraine policy by the president. Isn’t that correct, Mr. Kent?
KENT: That would be my understanding.
QUIGLEY: Ambassador?
TAYLOR: The same.
QUIGLEY: And I guess to close primer on hearsay, I think the American public needs to be reminded that countless people have been convicted on hearsay because the courts have routinely allowed and created needed exceptions to hearsay. Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct, as we have learned in painful instances and it’s certainly valid in this instance.
UNKNOWN: Would the gentleman yield? Because none of those exceptions would apply to this testimony.
SCHIFF: This is not the time for colloquy. Mr.–sorry, Representative Stefanik, you are recognized.
Trump claims donor funded White House ballroom includes hidden build below with security focus
Trump dominates CPAC poll as conservatives rally behind agenda, back Iran action
CNN Host Point Blank Asks Hakeem Jeffries If Shutdown Is Purely A Negotiating Tactic
Jaguar Makes Major Marketing Pivot After Woke Ad Disaster
Christian Father May Be Executed by Islamic Country
Passenger bomb threat triggers police response and evacuation on Frontier flight under investigation
DHS criticizes plea deal that could free migrant after guilty plea in teen assault case
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to what to expect on DHS funding when the Senate meets Monday
Bank of America to Pay $72.5M Settlement Over Epstein Lawsuit
Huckabee says Israeli police blocking Palm Sunday service is an ‘overreach’
Vacation rental near Yosemite allegedly used to secretly record guests, 4,000 illegal files found
Tiger Woods’ Friends Admit He ‘Drives Like a Bat Out of Hell Very Often’
How This Archaeological Find Shows the Ancient Link Between Israel and Persia
Scathing report claims nation’s oldest labor union ‘betrayed’ MAGA members through ‘shocking’ spending
Daughter of Air Canada flight attendant ejected from crash provides update, details mother’s injuriesSTEFANIK: Thank you. For the millions of Americans viewing today, the two most important facts are the following. Number one, Ukraine received the aid. Number two, there was in fact no investigation into Biden. Mr. Kent and Ambassador Taylor, you both spoke eloquently and passionately about the need to support Ukraine to counter Russian aggression, particularly during this very critical time. I agree with you in that assessment. And isn’t it the case that the Trump administration has indeed provided substantially aid to the Ukraine in the form of defense of legal aid, correct?
TAYLOR: That is correct.
Story cited here.
