PBS: Rep. Mike Quigley (D-IL) questioned George Kent, deputy assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs, and Bill Taylor, the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine, in the first public hearing in the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump. Quigley pushed back against Republican assertions that the Trump administration’s handling of Ukraine was appropriate and that “hearsay” should not be allowed in the testimony.
Texas Appeals Court Overturns Conviction of Police Officer Who Shot Armed Man
Incoming Dem Virginia Governor Appoints DEI Director Who Cheered on Destroying the Constitution
Minnesota fraud scandal intensifies debate over stripping citizenship
The economic policies shaping Trump’s return to the White House
Where people got their entertainment in 2025
Europe struggles to keep pace as US cracks the whip on defensive self-reliance
It’s the prices, stupid: The big challenge that lies ahead for Trump and the GOP
Here are the key 2026 House and Senate races to watch that could decide control of Congress
Trump says US will intervene if Iran starts killing protesters: ‘Locked and loaded’
Is a Korean reality show the last honest sport?
SBA suspends nearly 7,000 Minnesota borrowers over suspected $400M pandemic loan fraud
The Trump administration’s unfinished business in Gaza
The Force adrift
Hours after taking office, NYC Mayor Mamdani targets landlords, moves to intervene in private bankruptcy case
Numbers Don’t Lie: CNN, MSNBC Ratings Flip Upside Down from Trump’s First Term to Trump 2.0
REP. MIKE QUIGLEY (D-IL): Mr. Kent, as the day-to-day State Department point person in Washington on Ukraine policy, were you aware of this effort to persuade President Zelensky to issue a statement in order to get a White House meeting while they were happening?
KENT: When this exchange happened on August 10, I was not.
QUIGLEY: When did you learn about them?
KENT: As Ambassador Taylor referenced earlier in his testimony in oral answering, he heard on August 16. He then called me, and we had a conversation, and at that point I memorialized my concerns in a note to the file.
QUIGLEY: Ambassador Taylor, as the point person on the ground in Ukraine, were you aware of this effort to get Ukraine to issue this written statement in early August?
Texas Appeals Court Overturns Conviction of Police Officer Who Shot Armed Man
Incoming Dem Virginia Governor Appoints DEI Director Who Cheered on Destroying the Constitution
Minnesota fraud scandal intensifies debate over stripping citizenship
The economic policies shaping Trump’s return to the White House
Where people got their entertainment in 2025
Europe struggles to keep pace as US cracks the whip on defensive self-reliance
It’s the prices, stupid: The big challenge that lies ahead for Trump and the GOP
Here are the key 2026 House and Senate races to watch that could decide control of Congress
Trump says US will intervene if Iran starts killing protesters: ‘Locked and loaded’
Is a Korean reality show the last honest sport?
SBA suspends nearly 7,000 Minnesota borrowers over suspected $400M pandemic loan fraud
The Trump administration’s unfinished business in Gaza
The Force adrift
Hours after taking office, NYC Mayor Mamdani targets landlords, moves to intervene in private bankruptcy case
Numbers Don’t Lie: CNN, MSNBC Ratings Flip Upside Down from Trump’s First Term to Trump 2.0TAYLOR: Not the written statement, no, sir.
QUIGLEY: So the entire discussion about a public statement about the two investigations President Trump wanted was done in what you have described as an irregular channel, involving Ambassador Sondland and Volker and the task to take on Ukraine policy by the president. Isn’t that correct, Mr. Kent?
KENT: That would be my understanding.
QUIGLEY: Ambassador?
TAYLOR: The same.
QUIGLEY: And I guess to close primer on hearsay, I think the American public needs to be reminded that countless people have been convicted on hearsay because the courts have routinely allowed and created needed exceptions to hearsay. Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct, as we have learned in painful instances and it’s certainly valid in this instance.
UNKNOWN: Would the gentleman yield? Because none of those exceptions would apply to this testimony.
SCHIFF: This is not the time for colloquy. Mr.–sorry, Representative Stefanik, you are recognized.
Texas Appeals Court Overturns Conviction of Police Officer Who Shot Armed Man
Incoming Dem Virginia Governor Appoints DEI Director Who Cheered on Destroying the Constitution
Minnesota fraud scandal intensifies debate over stripping citizenship
The economic policies shaping Trump’s return to the White House
Where people got their entertainment in 2025
Europe struggles to keep pace as US cracks the whip on defensive self-reliance
It’s the prices, stupid: The big challenge that lies ahead for Trump and the GOP
Here are the key 2026 House and Senate races to watch that could decide control of Congress
Trump says US will intervene if Iran starts killing protesters: ‘Locked and loaded’
Is a Korean reality show the last honest sport?
SBA suspends nearly 7,000 Minnesota borrowers over suspected $400M pandemic loan fraud
The Trump administration’s unfinished business in Gaza
The Force adrift
Hours after taking office, NYC Mayor Mamdani targets landlords, moves to intervene in private bankruptcy case
Numbers Don’t Lie: CNN, MSNBC Ratings Flip Upside Down from Trump’s First Term to Trump 2.0STEFANIK: Thank you. For the millions of Americans viewing today, the two most important facts are the following. Number one, Ukraine received the aid. Number two, there was in fact no investigation into Biden. Mr. Kent and Ambassador Taylor, you both spoke eloquently and passionately about the need to support Ukraine to counter Russian aggression, particularly during this very critical time. I agree with you in that assessment. And isn’t it the case that the Trump administration has indeed provided substantially aid to the Ukraine in the form of defense of legal aid, correct?
TAYLOR: That is correct.
Story cited here.
