PBS: Rep. Mike Quigley (D-IL) questioned George Kent, deputy assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs, and Bill Taylor, the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine, in the first public hearing in the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump. Quigley pushed back against Republican assertions that the Trump administration’s handling of Ukraine was appropriate and that “hearsay” should not be allowed in the testimony.
Turning Point Action endorses Ken Paxton in Texas Senate race
Nancy Guthrie was expected at friend’s home, not church on day she vanished: source
Teen who shared cabin with Anna Kepner faces federal scrutiny in cruise ship death
Appeals court backs Noem move to end TPS protections for Nepal, Honduras, Nicaragua
Watch: ‘Miracle on Ice’ Legend Mike Eruzione Scolds Whining US Olympians for Getting Political
Trump says he will block US-Canada Bridge unless Canada negotiates on trade
Keir Starmer insists he won’t resign amid potential replacements already emerging
Court rules against California ICE mask ban in win for Trump administration
No More Super Bowls for California – Seahawks QB Will Reportedly Owe Money for Winning a Ring Thanks to State’s Insane Tax Laws
Jeffries accuses Republicans of ‘voter suppression’ over bill requiring voter ID, proof of citizenship
House passes bipartisan housing bill as Trump zeroes in on affordability crisis
US Forces Board Vessel ‘Operating in Defiance’ of Trump’s Quarantine: ‘It Ran, and We Followed’
Why the NFL doesn’t care about Bad Bunny MAGA backlash
NFL Rookie Charged with 5 Felonies After Allegedly Crashing Into WNBA Player’s Vehicle and Hitting a Police Officer
Hagerty urges FCC to punish Verizon over release of Senate phone data
REP. MIKE QUIGLEY (D-IL): Mr. Kent, as the day-to-day State Department point person in Washington on Ukraine policy, were you aware of this effort to persuade President Zelensky to issue a statement in order to get a White House meeting while they were happening?
KENT: When this exchange happened on August 10, I was not.
QUIGLEY: When did you learn about them?
KENT: As Ambassador Taylor referenced earlier in his testimony in oral answering, he heard on August 16. He then called me, and we had a conversation, and at that point I memorialized my concerns in a note to the file.
QUIGLEY: Ambassador Taylor, as the point person on the ground in Ukraine, were you aware of this effort to get Ukraine to issue this written statement in early August?
Turning Point Action endorses Ken Paxton in Texas Senate race
Nancy Guthrie was expected at friend’s home, not church on day she vanished: source
Teen who shared cabin with Anna Kepner faces federal scrutiny in cruise ship death
Appeals court backs Noem move to end TPS protections for Nepal, Honduras, Nicaragua
Watch: ‘Miracle on Ice’ Legend Mike Eruzione Scolds Whining US Olympians for Getting Political
Trump says he will block US-Canada Bridge unless Canada negotiates on trade
Keir Starmer insists he won’t resign amid potential replacements already emerging
Court rules against California ICE mask ban in win for Trump administration
No More Super Bowls for California – Seahawks QB Will Reportedly Owe Money for Winning a Ring Thanks to State’s Insane Tax Laws
Jeffries accuses Republicans of ‘voter suppression’ over bill requiring voter ID, proof of citizenship
House passes bipartisan housing bill as Trump zeroes in on affordability crisis
US Forces Board Vessel ‘Operating in Defiance’ of Trump’s Quarantine: ‘It Ran, and We Followed’
Why the NFL doesn’t care about Bad Bunny MAGA backlash
NFL Rookie Charged with 5 Felonies After Allegedly Crashing Into WNBA Player’s Vehicle and Hitting a Police Officer
Hagerty urges FCC to punish Verizon over release of Senate phone dataTAYLOR: Not the written statement, no, sir.
QUIGLEY: So the entire discussion about a public statement about the two investigations President Trump wanted was done in what you have described as an irregular channel, involving Ambassador Sondland and Volker and the task to take on Ukraine policy by the president. Isn’t that correct, Mr. Kent?
KENT: That would be my understanding.
QUIGLEY: Ambassador?
TAYLOR: The same.
QUIGLEY: And I guess to close primer on hearsay, I think the American public needs to be reminded that countless people have been convicted on hearsay because the courts have routinely allowed and created needed exceptions to hearsay. Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct, as we have learned in painful instances and it’s certainly valid in this instance.
UNKNOWN: Would the gentleman yield? Because none of those exceptions would apply to this testimony.
SCHIFF: This is not the time for colloquy. Mr.–sorry, Representative Stefanik, you are recognized.
Turning Point Action endorses Ken Paxton in Texas Senate race
Nancy Guthrie was expected at friend’s home, not church on day she vanished: source
Teen who shared cabin with Anna Kepner faces federal scrutiny in cruise ship death
Appeals court backs Noem move to end TPS protections for Nepal, Honduras, Nicaragua
Watch: ‘Miracle on Ice’ Legend Mike Eruzione Scolds Whining US Olympians for Getting Political
Trump says he will block US-Canada Bridge unless Canada negotiates on trade
Keir Starmer insists he won’t resign amid potential replacements already emerging
Court rules against California ICE mask ban in win for Trump administration
No More Super Bowls for California – Seahawks QB Will Reportedly Owe Money for Winning a Ring Thanks to State’s Insane Tax Laws
Jeffries accuses Republicans of ‘voter suppression’ over bill requiring voter ID, proof of citizenship
House passes bipartisan housing bill as Trump zeroes in on affordability crisis
US Forces Board Vessel ‘Operating in Defiance’ of Trump’s Quarantine: ‘It Ran, and We Followed’
Why the NFL doesn’t care about Bad Bunny MAGA backlash
NFL Rookie Charged with 5 Felonies After Allegedly Crashing Into WNBA Player’s Vehicle and Hitting a Police Officer
Hagerty urges FCC to punish Verizon over release of Senate phone dataSTEFANIK: Thank you. For the millions of Americans viewing today, the two most important facts are the following. Number one, Ukraine received the aid. Number two, there was in fact no investigation into Biden. Mr. Kent and Ambassador Taylor, you both spoke eloquently and passionately about the need to support Ukraine to counter Russian aggression, particularly during this very critical time. I agree with you in that assessment. And isn’t it the case that the Trump administration has indeed provided substantially aid to the Ukraine in the form of defense of legal aid, correct?
TAYLOR: That is correct.
Story cited here.
