PBS: Rep. Mike Quigley (D-IL) questioned George Kent, deputy assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs, and Bill Taylor, the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine, in the first public hearing in the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump. Quigley pushed back against Republican assertions that the Trump administration’s handling of Ukraine was appropriate and that “hearsay” should not be allowed in the testimony.
Humanoid robots could patrol southern border, CEO pitches, as futuristic technology moves closer to reality
Men Are Not Women: Stand Up for the Truth
The only map you need to see as California’s billionaire tax fight heats up
Lexington, Kentucky park shooting kills 1, injures 4 during live band performance
Democrats Want ID for Hot Pockets But Not for Voting?
Last-Ditch Effort to Kill Trump Fossil Fuel EOs Goes Down in Flames
Family killer Chris Watts seeks prison marriage with new love interest: report
Why Did Pollsters Get Michigan And Wisconsin Primaries So Wrong?
Jon Ossoff, Georgia’s first Jewish senator, faces angry Jewish voters
Trump’s men at the United Nations
Swing-state’s fraud reckoning raises Minnesota-style alarm as wild schemes exposed
Mundane DOJ Memo on Post Office Gun Bans Is Actually Bigger Deal Than You Think
ICE bought nonlethal shock gloves for officers. Democrats still are not pleased
Americans clash over transgender athletes as debate heats up: ‘Just getting outrageous’
Routine California traffic stop leads to seizure of 30 pounds of cocaine worth more than $800K
REP. MIKE QUIGLEY (D-IL): Mr. Kent, as the day-to-day State Department point person in Washington on Ukraine policy, were you aware of this effort to persuade President Zelensky to issue a statement in order to get a White House meeting while they were happening?
KENT: When this exchange happened on August 10, I was not.
QUIGLEY: When did you learn about them?
KENT: As Ambassador Taylor referenced earlier in his testimony in oral answering, he heard on August 16. He then called me, and we had a conversation, and at that point I memorialized my concerns in a note to the file.
QUIGLEY: Ambassador Taylor, as the point person on the ground in Ukraine, were you aware of this effort to get Ukraine to issue this written statement in early August?
Humanoid robots could patrol southern border, CEO pitches, as futuristic technology moves closer to reality
Men Are Not Women: Stand Up for the Truth
The only map you need to see as California’s billionaire tax fight heats up
Lexington, Kentucky park shooting kills 1, injures 4 during live band performance
Democrats Want ID for Hot Pockets But Not for Voting?
Last-Ditch Effort to Kill Trump Fossil Fuel EOs Goes Down in Flames
Family killer Chris Watts seeks prison marriage with new love interest: report
Why Did Pollsters Get Michigan And Wisconsin Primaries So Wrong?
Jon Ossoff, Georgia’s first Jewish senator, faces angry Jewish voters
Trump’s men at the United Nations
Swing-state’s fraud reckoning raises Minnesota-style alarm as wild schemes exposed
Mundane DOJ Memo on Post Office Gun Bans Is Actually Bigger Deal Than You Think
ICE bought nonlethal shock gloves for officers. Democrats still are not pleased
Americans clash over transgender athletes as debate heats up: ‘Just getting outrageous’
Routine California traffic stop leads to seizure of 30 pounds of cocaine worth more than $800KTAYLOR: Not the written statement, no, sir.
QUIGLEY: So the entire discussion about a public statement about the two investigations President Trump wanted was done in what you have described as an irregular channel, involving Ambassador Sondland and Volker and the task to take on Ukraine policy by the president. Isn’t that correct, Mr. Kent?
KENT: That would be my understanding.
QUIGLEY: Ambassador?
TAYLOR: The same.
QUIGLEY: And I guess to close primer on hearsay, I think the American public needs to be reminded that countless people have been convicted on hearsay because the courts have routinely allowed and created needed exceptions to hearsay. Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct, as we have learned in painful instances and it’s certainly valid in this instance.
UNKNOWN: Would the gentleman yield? Because none of those exceptions would apply to this testimony.
SCHIFF: This is not the time for colloquy. Mr.–sorry, Representative Stefanik, you are recognized.
Humanoid robots could patrol southern border, CEO pitches, as futuristic technology moves closer to reality
Men Are Not Women: Stand Up for the Truth
The only map you need to see as California’s billionaire tax fight heats up
Lexington, Kentucky park shooting kills 1, injures 4 during live band performance
Democrats Want ID for Hot Pockets But Not for Voting?
Last-Ditch Effort to Kill Trump Fossil Fuel EOs Goes Down in Flames
Family killer Chris Watts seeks prison marriage with new love interest: report
Why Did Pollsters Get Michigan And Wisconsin Primaries So Wrong?
Jon Ossoff, Georgia’s first Jewish senator, faces angry Jewish voters
Trump’s men at the United Nations
Swing-state’s fraud reckoning raises Minnesota-style alarm as wild schemes exposed
Mundane DOJ Memo on Post Office Gun Bans Is Actually Bigger Deal Than You Think
ICE bought nonlethal shock gloves for officers. Democrats still are not pleased
Americans clash over transgender athletes as debate heats up: ‘Just getting outrageous’
Routine California traffic stop leads to seizure of 30 pounds of cocaine worth more than $800KSTEFANIK: Thank you. For the millions of Americans viewing today, the two most important facts are the following. Number one, Ukraine received the aid. Number two, there was in fact no investigation into Biden. Mr. Kent and Ambassador Taylor, you both spoke eloquently and passionately about the need to support Ukraine to counter Russian aggression, particularly during this very critical time. I agree with you in that assessment. And isn’t it the case that the Trump administration has indeed provided substantially aid to the Ukraine in the form of defense of legal aid, correct?
TAYLOR: That is correct.
Story cited here.
