In what appears to not only violate common sense but congressional law, the Connecticut Supreme Court said Thursday that the victims and families of the Sandy Hook school shooting can move forward with a lawsuit against Remington, the manufacturer of the Bushmaster rifle Adam Lanza used to carry out the massacre. Experts predict that the case will now go before the U.S. Supreme Court, seeing as how the Second Amendment and The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act both hang in the balance of this decision.
Not to mention the fact that, um, this kind of liability could literally end U.S. gun manufacturing and sales overnight.
From the New York Times:
In the lawsuit, the families seized upon the marketing for the AR-15-style Bushmaster used in the 2012 attack, which invoked the violence of combat and used slogans like “Consider your man card reissued.”
Lawyers for the families argued that those messages reflected a deliberate effort to appeal to troubled young men like Adam Lanza, the 20-year-old who charged into the elementary school and killed 26 people, including 20 first graders, in a spray of gunfire.
In the 4-3 ruling, the justices agreed with a lower court judge’s decision to dismiss most of the claims raised by the families, but also found that the sweeping federal protections did not prevent the families from bringing a lawsuit based on wrongful marketing claims. The court ruled that the case can move ahead based on a state law regarding unfair trade practices.
GOP holdouts complicate Trump’s final chances to reshape US courts
Longtime GOP leader faces uncertain future after Jim Jordan wins House leadership fight
Stephen Miller’s internal memo unleashes Trump agencies after ‘absolute control’ under Wiles’ reign
Foreign spy ‘honeytraps’ targeting America’s tech elite spark alarm amid Nvidia CEO scandal
Russia’s Ambassador to the US Dies ‘Suddenly’ Per Country’s Foreign Ministry
Armed Oregon Dad Who Engaged School Shooter Reveals His Final Words to the Killer Before Putting Him Down
Illegal immigrant’s alleged plane hijack scare fuels tense security scramble after door was ‘breached’: audio
Candidate leads California race despite death months ago
Twice-Deported Illegal Alien Triggers Hijack Alert on United Flight After Rushing Cockpit: DHS
French novelist who wrote about Muslim-leftist takeover charged with hate speech for ‘Great Replacement’ comments
Democrats Are Turning on Each Other After Bizarre Absences Cause Hegseth Impeachment Effort to Fail
Wes Moore’s military record under renewed scrutiny after Army supervisor disputes his Afghanistan combat claims
Trump 45 alumni get behind a new name for press secretary
Hegseth could face new impeachment push over Ukraine aid, lawmakers warn
Ilhan Omar appears clueless on basis for federal probes: ‘You probably have more details on that’
It’s hard to see how Remington could be held liable for “wrongful marketing” unless they were specifically advertising a weapon that could feasibly be used to shoot up a kindergarten. Or making some kind of “Hey, weirdo, this gun is perfect for taking your revenge out on an unloving and hateful world!” We’re pretty sure Remington did not engage in marketing of that sort, and so it is ridiculous to claim that they bear any responsibility whatsoever for what Lanza did on that fateful day in 2012.
It is impossible not to feel ongoing sympathy for the families who survived this terrible tragedy, and we don’t even have any particular ill will towards them for trying to seek redress wherever they can find it. Tragedy and logic rarely go hand in hand.
But that doesn’t change the fact that this sort of liability is outlandish, nonsensical, and in direct conflict with the Second Amendment. Not to mention, it opens the door wide open for manufacturers of knives, cars, pressure cookers, and any number of products to be sued for liability. Let’s hope the Supreme Court strikes this down, because it opens up a can of worms that could literally devastate American industry, to say nothing of our rights.
