‘Completely Erroneous’: New York Times Busted for Fake News Story on Harriet Tubman $20 Bill

That source fueled speculation from the New York Times, which pondered if Mnuchin “delayed” the release in order to avoid conflict from Trump, who is a fan of the Andrew Jackson $20 bill.

But the Treasury Department, which oversees the engraving bureau, decided that a new $20 bill would not be made public next year. Current and former department officials say Mr. Mnuchin chose the delay to avoid the possibility that Mr. Trump would cancel the plan outright and create even more controversy.

Mnuchin has denied that.

Further, by citing the anonymous employee, the Times implied that the design is much further along than the current administration is willing to admit.

The U.S. Treasury Department is denying the Times’ story altogether. Senior Adviser for Public Affairs to the Secretary of the Treasury Monica Crowley said the existing timetable is “consistent” with the previous administration’s, adding that Mnuchin is focused solely on “security features and anti-counterfeiting measures.”

“The scheduled release (printing) of the $20 bill is on a timetable consistent with the previous administration,” Crowley said in a statement.

“The Secretary at this point is focused on security features and anti-counterfeiting measures related to the currency,” the statement continued. “The suggestion that the process is being delayed is completely erroneous.”

Treasury spokesperson response to today’s misleading New York Times story: pic.twitter.com/PeMcoVL8tC

— Treasury Public Affairs (@TreasurySpox) June 14, 2019

Bureau of Engraving and Printing Director Len Olijar also released a strong statement denying the existence of a potential 2020 release. That was never going to happen, he claimed, while adding that the focus lies squarely with implementing advanced security features. Because those take years to finalize, it would be impossible to make legitimate mock-ups of the bill public.

The statement reads in part:

“As technology has evolved, banknote production has vastly changed over the last three decades. The next family of notes require new, overt and covert security features for the public, the banknote equipment manufacturers, and the central bank, to keep our currency safe and secure. Security features also need to work in mass production. A design can change during testing. The overwhelming success of the redesigned $100 in thwarting counterfeiting, is greatly due to the effectiveness of the blue security thread which is a public feature (and which a design was integrated around afterwards). That development alone of that security feature took approximately 10 years to finalize.

---

Socialism’s growing appeal meets an awkward reality check on college campus

---

Illinois County, Connecticut Cite Weapons You Never Heard of to Justify Their Gun Bans to SCOTUS

---

United Methodist Church Sees Considerable Membership Drop in U.S.: Report

---

Mike Johnson’s future hangs in balance as the ‘accidental speaker’ marks 3 years

---

Here are the states with voter ID on the ballot this November

---

Alarming fraud trend puts small-town mosque with industry and foreign govt ties in focus: ‘Our motherland now’

---

Leavitt says Trump is defying midterm headwinds as he barnstorms country

---

Florida A&M University shooting leaves 12 injured, including 6 children, near football stadium

---

Op-Ed: Stalin Believed in Predestination – Just Not the Calvinist Kind

---

Obama makes the case for el Sayed and a Democratic Party that can disagree

---

Constitutional Attorney: If We’re Not Careful, the US Could End Up Like France

---

Ukraine’s Starlink restored as Elon Musk claims Kyiv violated terms of service ‘to kill people’

---

Breaking: ‘Explosion’ at Quaker Oats Factory Rocks Midwest City as Large Smoke Cloud Looms

---

Obama compares Trump’s White House renovations to ‘Saddam Hussein opening a Cheesecake Factory’ at Ohio rally

---

Trump’s go-to Michigan auto worker gets a job and the spotlight

---

“Moreover, BEP was never going to unveil a note design in 2020. To keep our currency safe and secure, it is unwise to give counterfeiters a look at a potential future note far in advance of a note going into circulation. Additionally, if the concept of a note that was made public by the government were to change during that lengthy amount of time, it would create confusion in the global marketplace, further aiding counterfeiters.”

“No Bureau or Department official has ‘scrapped’ anything; it is too early to develop an integrated concept or design until security features are finalized. The aesthetics or look of the note has always come after and been driven by the security features. Everything remains on the table.

Olijar added that the Times’ “sneak peek” of the Tubman $20 bill is not anything new. Rather, it is merely a “copy of an old Series note with the signatures of former officials, with a different image super-imposed on it.”

“It is not a new $20 note, as incorrectly stated by the New York Times, in any way, shape or form,” Olijar said. “The facsimile contained no security features or offset printing included on currency notes.”

“There is nothing about that illustration that even begins to meet technical requirements for the next family of notes,” he added.

Story cited here.