Comey’s Draft Statement Exonerating Clinton Two Months before Her FBI Interview Was Not Normal Protocol

WASHINGTON — “This is the only time I am aware of, sir.” “I have not seen that before, sir.” “I’ve never seen that.”

These are just some of the words utilized by former acting FBI director Andrew McCabe when asked during closed door testimony about an email penned by disgraced ex-FBI chief James Comey circulating a draft statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in the private email server case a full two months before the FBI interviewed Clinton and other witnesses in the criminal probe.

Documents previously released by the FBI show that Comey on May 2, 2016 sent the email in question to McCabe, FBI general counsel James Baker and chief of staff and senior counselor James Rybicki. Clinton was interviewed by the FBI on June 2, with Comey later testifying that she was not sworn in and that the interview was not recorded.

Two months before Clinton’s FBI interview, Comey circulated the draft statement testing language to be used for not recommending charges against Clinton.

Former Rep. Bob Goodlatte, who served as chairman of the House Judiciary Committee at the time of McCabe’s December 21, 2017 testimony, read aloud Comey’s email. A transcript of the testimony was released three weeks ago by House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Doug Collins, R-Ga, although the portion in question did not receive media attention.

Luigi Mangione case: If stalking and assault aren’t ‘crimes of violence,’ death penalty vanishes

Oklahoma man charged with threatening to kill ICE agents, MAGA Republicans online

Supreme Court worried letting Trump fire Lisa Cook jeopardizes Fed independence

‘Patrick Bateman meets Sparkle Beach Ken’ turns Davos into the Gavin Newsom show

Federal judge blocks lawmakers’ effort to force DOJ release of Epstein files

Kavanaugh warns Trump case could ‘shatter’ Federal Reserve independence in Supreme Court hearing

Watch: Scott Bessent Unleashes on Gavin Newsom at Davos, Gives Him a Painful New Nickname

CNN Panelist Issues Retraction and Apology After Going Too Far in On-Air Trump Attack

NATO chief praises Trump at Davos, says he forced Europe to ‘step up’ on defense

Vice President JD Vance to visit Minneapolis, source says, amid unrest over ICE operations

NATO Chief Tells World Leaders ‘Trump Is Right’ About Greenland

Air Force One Forced to Turn Around and Make Unscheduled Landing During Trump’s Trip to Europe

NASA astronaut who was stuck in space retires after 27-year career

Mamdani Turns Into Kamala Harris on ‘The View’ – Responds With Gibberish to Question on Aides’ Rabid Anti-White Racism

Mexico flies 37 cartel members to US under pressure from Trump admin

Goodlatte read Comey’s email as follows:

The penultimate paragraph of the May 2 draft reads as follows: Accordingly, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters such as this, I am completing the investigation by expressing to Justice my view that no charges are appropriate in this case.

Goodlatte noted that “this paragraph is virtually identical to what Director Comey eventually said more than 2 months later on July 25, 2016, in recommending no charges against Secretary Clinton. It seems to confirm that the FBI, including the Director, had made up its mind not to charge Secretary Clinton before interviewing her.”

McCabe disputed that characterization, retorting, “It may seem that way reading it now. But I know that Director Comey had not made up his mind at that time.”

is no evidence that Comey tested language to use if charges were to be filed against Clinton. Indeed, McCabe admitted as much when he was asked whether Comey similarly prepared a statement recommending charges in the Clinton email case.

McCabe then repeatedly stated that he is not aware of any other precedent similar to Comey’s draft statement against recommending charges two months before Clinton was interviewed.