Comey’s Draft Statement Exonerating Clinton Two Months before Her FBI Interview Was Not Normal Protocol

WASHINGTON — “This is the only time I am aware of, sir.” “I have not seen that before, sir.” “I’ve never seen that.”

These are just some of the words utilized by former acting FBI director Andrew McCabe when asked during closed door testimony about an email penned by disgraced ex-FBI chief James Comey circulating a draft statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in the private email server case a full two months before the FBI interviewed Clinton and other witnesses in the criminal probe.

Documents previously released by the FBI show that Comey on May 2, 2016 sent the email in question to McCabe, FBI general counsel James Baker and chief of staff and senior counselor James Rybicki. Clinton was interviewed by the FBI on June 2, with Comey later testifying that she was not sworn in and that the interview was not recorded.

Two months before Clinton’s FBI interview, Comey circulated the draft statement testing language to be used for not recommending charges against Clinton.

Former Rep. Bob Goodlatte, who served as chairman of the House Judiciary Committee at the time of McCabe’s December 21, 2017 testimony, read aloud Comey’s email. A transcript of the testimony was released three weeks ago by House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Doug Collins, R-Ga, although the portion in question did not receive media attention.

Minnesota bill would ban warrants allowing police to collect data from devices near a crime scene

Jasmine Crockett defends her security guard who was killed in police standoff, wanted for impersonating cop

ABC News Left Out Crucial Context In Story About Iran Drone Threat To California

Anti-ICE agitators blow cover in Boston, allowing child rape suspect to evade arrest for weeks

Utah children’s book author Kouri Richins convicted in husband’s murder

Trump questions Newsom’s fitness for White House, citing his dyslexia

Court allows DOJ to proceed with appeal over law firm executive orders

Trump lawyer in Jack Smith case draws conservative backing after DOJ praise rattles ‘elite’ legal conference

Vance accuses media of trying to ‘drive a wedge’ between him and Trump over Iran

Cornyn clashes with progressive Rep Greg Casar in heated airport face-off over DHS shutdown

Trump Kennedy Center’s board votes unanimously to approve $257M renovations and two-year closure

Father Sues Blue-State School District on Behalf of His Son Over Pledge of Allegiance

Leaked audio reveals new Iranian supreme leader survived strike because he went outside

Head of Kennedy Center Who Fired Founder of The Western Journal Over Biblical Values Is Now Stepping Down

Mexican illegal alien allegedly used Roblox currency to solicit explicit content from kids under 10

Goodlatte read Comey’s email as follows:

The penultimate paragraph of the May 2 draft reads as follows: Accordingly, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters such as this, I am completing the investigation by expressing to Justice my view that no charges are appropriate in this case.

Goodlatte noted that “this paragraph is virtually identical to what Director Comey eventually said more than 2 months later on July 25, 2016, in recommending no charges against Secretary Clinton. It seems to confirm that the FBI, including the Director, had made up its mind not to charge Secretary Clinton before interviewing her.”

McCabe disputed that characterization, retorting, “It may seem that way reading it now. But I know that Director Comey had not made up his mind at that time.”

is no evidence that Comey tested language to use if charges were to be filed against Clinton. Indeed, McCabe admitted as much when he was asked whether Comey similarly prepared a statement recommending charges in the Clinton email case.

McCabe then repeatedly stated that he is not aware of any other precedent similar to Comey’s draft statement against recommending charges two months before Clinton was interviewed.