Comey’s Draft Statement Exonerating Clinton Two Months before Her FBI Interview Was Not Normal Protocol

WASHINGTON — “This is the only time I am aware of, sir.” “I have not seen that before, sir.” “I’ve never seen that.”

These are just some of the words utilized by former acting FBI director Andrew McCabe when asked during closed door testimony about an email penned by disgraced ex-FBI chief James Comey circulating a draft statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in the private email server case a full two months before the FBI interviewed Clinton and other witnesses in the criminal probe.

Documents previously released by the FBI show that Comey on May 2, 2016 sent the email in question to McCabe, FBI general counsel James Baker and chief of staff and senior counselor James Rybicki. Clinton was interviewed by the FBI on June 2, with Comey later testifying that she was not sworn in and that the interview was not recorded.

Two months before Clinton’s FBI interview, Comey circulated the draft statement testing language to be used for not recommending charges against Clinton.

Former Rep. Bob Goodlatte, who served as chairman of the House Judiciary Committee at the time of McCabe’s December 21, 2017 testimony, read aloud Comey’s email. A transcript of the testimony was released three weeks ago by House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Doug Collins, R-Ga, although the portion in question did not receive media attention.

NYC Judge Frees Man Accused of Shooting Service Dog of Woman with Down Syndrome While Attempting to Kill Man

DOJ Arrests Honduran Man Accused of Taking Advantage of California’s Weak Election Laws

LGBTQ group reveals which Dem nominee is sponsoring Halloween event featuring drag shows

Woman accused of defacing WWII Memorial with spray paint indicted by federal grand jury

Woody Harrelson Formally Asks UK’s New Prime Minister to Probe COVID ‘Vaccine Injury’

Watch: Dems’ New ‘Anti-Zionism’ Is Really Anti-Semitism, And It Only Takes 30 Seconds for Biggest Game Streamer in the World to Explain It

Judge throws out Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s 9/11 confession in already long wait for trial

Trump vows ‘powerful appeal’ after another federal court rejects hush money case

Three sentenced for Feeding Our Future fraud at Minnesota meal sites

Reagan-era official warns ‘red-green alliance’ has shared goal of ‘destroying’ America

Antifa-linked sites go dark after State Department terror designation of tech collective

Jerry Sandusky granted new evidentiary hearing after accuser recants testimony

Jerry Sandusky Accuser to Recant Testimony in Court

Local Pennsylvania Official Accuses Gov. Shapiro of Major ‘Measles Deaths’ Deception

Newsom targets major affordability squeeze in ‘striking’ convergence with Trump

Goodlatte read Comey’s email as follows:

The penultimate paragraph of the May 2 draft reads as follows: Accordingly, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters such as this, I am completing the investigation by expressing to Justice my view that no charges are appropriate in this case.

Goodlatte noted that “this paragraph is virtually identical to what Director Comey eventually said more than 2 months later on July 25, 2016, in recommending no charges against Secretary Clinton. It seems to confirm that the FBI, including the Director, had made up its mind not to charge Secretary Clinton before interviewing her.”

McCabe disputed that characterization, retorting, “It may seem that way reading it now. But I know that Director Comey had not made up his mind at that time.”

is no evidence that Comey tested language to use if charges were to be filed against Clinton. Indeed, McCabe admitted as much when he was asked whether Comey similarly prepared a statement recommending charges in the Clinton email case.

McCabe then repeatedly stated that he is not aware of any other precedent similar to Comey’s draft statement against recommending charges two months before Clinton was interviewed.