Comey’s Draft Statement Exonerating Clinton Two Months before Her FBI Interview Was Not Normal Protocol

WASHINGTON — “This is the only time I am aware of, sir.” “I have not seen that before, sir.” “I’ve never seen that.”

These are just some of the words utilized by former acting FBI director Andrew McCabe when asked during closed door testimony about an email penned by disgraced ex-FBI chief James Comey circulating a draft statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in the private email server case a full two months before the FBI interviewed Clinton and other witnesses in the criminal probe.

Documents previously released by the FBI show that Comey on May 2, 2016 sent the email in question to McCabe, FBI general counsel James Baker and chief of staff and senior counselor James Rybicki. Clinton was interviewed by the FBI on June 2, with Comey later testifying that she was not sworn in and that the interview was not recorded.

Two months before Clinton’s FBI interview, Comey circulated the draft statement testing language to be used for not recommending charges against Clinton.

Former Rep. Bob Goodlatte, who served as chairman of the House Judiciary Committee at the time of McCabe’s December 21, 2017 testimony, read aloud Comey’s email. A transcript of the testimony was released three weeks ago by House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Doug Collins, R-Ga, although the portion in question did not receive media attention.

Watch: Baby Saved from Planned Parenthood After Sidewalk Counselor Convinces Father to Intervene

Struggling Canadian Vet Calls VA for Help, Says Caseworker Suggested He Consider Killing Himself With Canada’s New ‘Assisted Dying Service’

Inside the House GOP strategy to capitalize on Democrats’ warring factions in the new Congress

Trump keeps signaling an end to Iran war, but expert warns a crucial piece of his strategy is missing

Republicans unwilling to force an end to Iran war despite midterm beating

Richard Fowler wins Washington Examiner election contest

Democrat flips Alaska governor’s mansion after Trump-backed GOP infighting

Rubio’s Federalist Society performance fuels 2028 fire: ‘If he runs, he’ll be formidable’

Storybook Wedding … in a Swamp? Couple Opts for a Shrek Wedding, Hoping for Their Happily Ever After

Chicago’s Chief Financial Officer Abruptly Quits Rather Than Be Forced to ‘Compromise’ Her ‘Integrity’

Newly Elected House Democrat Admits He Is Under Investigation for Sexual Harassment

Rubio buoys conservative spirits after midterm rout: ‘Great things that last are built in decades, not election cycles’

DHS Sec. Markwayne Mullin Refuses to Rule Out Cyberattack or AI Issue as Ground Stop Continues

John Kennedy Gets Serious: Lays Out What Senate GOP Needs to Do Before Dems Take Control

Coincidence? FAA Rolled Out New AI Tool Days Before Friday’s Groundstop

Goodlatte read Comey’s email as follows:

The penultimate paragraph of the May 2 draft reads as follows: Accordingly, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters such as this, I am completing the investigation by expressing to Justice my view that no charges are appropriate in this case.

Goodlatte noted that “this paragraph is virtually identical to what Director Comey eventually said more than 2 months later on July 25, 2016, in recommending no charges against Secretary Clinton. It seems to confirm that the FBI, including the Director, had made up its mind not to charge Secretary Clinton before interviewing her.”

McCabe disputed that characterization, retorting, “It may seem that way reading it now. But I know that Director Comey had not made up his mind at that time.”

is no evidence that Comey tested language to use if charges were to be filed against Clinton. Indeed, McCabe admitted as much when he was asked whether Comey similarly prepared a statement recommending charges in the Clinton email case.

McCabe then repeatedly stated that he is not aware of any other precedent similar to Comey’s draft statement against recommending charges two months before Clinton was interviewed.