Comey’s Draft Statement Exonerating Clinton Two Months before Her FBI Interview Was Not Normal Protocol

WASHINGTON — “This is the only time I am aware of, sir.” “I have not seen that before, sir.” “I’ve never seen that.”

These are just some of the words utilized by former acting FBI director Andrew McCabe when asked during closed door testimony about an email penned by disgraced ex-FBI chief James Comey circulating a draft statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in the private email server case a full two months before the FBI interviewed Clinton and other witnesses in the criminal probe.

Documents previously released by the FBI show that Comey on May 2, 2016 sent the email in question to McCabe, FBI general counsel James Baker and chief of staff and senior counselor James Rybicki. Clinton was interviewed by the FBI on June 2, with Comey later testifying that she was not sworn in and that the interview was not recorded.

Two months before Clinton’s FBI interview, Comey circulated the draft statement testing language to be used for not recommending charges against Clinton.

Former Rep. Bob Goodlatte, who served as chairman of the House Judiciary Committee at the time of McCabe’s December 21, 2017 testimony, read aloud Comey’s email. A transcript of the testimony was released three weeks ago by House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Doug Collins, R-Ga, although the portion in question did not receive media attention.

Australian authorities say Bondi Beach suspects with Islamic State flags not part of ‘terrorist cell’

Saudi Arabia strikes Mukalla port over ‘extremely dangerous’ actions by ally UAE

Minnesota Dem Senate candidate faces call from opponent to apologize over viral ‘pandering’ hijab video

Corporate Media Outlets Turning a Blind Eye to Minnesota Fraud Involving Somalis

Minnesota State-Licensed ‘Day Care’ Has Listed Number Taking You To Tim Walz’s Office

Fetterman endorses prospect of potential future strikes to derail any Iranian nuclear ambitions

Armed Americans fight back: Inside 2025’s most gripping self-defense shootings across the US

2025 Most Memorable Heartwarming Moments: December 30, 2025

Trump’s latest funding cuts dampen bipartisan dealmaking in 2026

Trump’s Top 10 Campaign Promises Fulfilled in First Year

Texas antifa terrorism case: Confessions mount as Trump DOJ clinches more convictions

Walz allies led state agencies that oversaw massive alleged Somali daycare fraud

Eric Adams says Biden DOJ used ‘lawfare’ against him, compares treatment to Trump

State officials and daycare manager push back on viral video fraud allegations in Minnesota

Unearthed surveillance exposes how parents were allegedly involved in Minnesota’s daycare fraud scheme

Goodlatte read Comey’s email as follows:

The penultimate paragraph of the May 2 draft reads as follows: Accordingly, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters such as this, I am completing the investigation by expressing to Justice my view that no charges are appropriate in this case.

Goodlatte noted that “this paragraph is virtually identical to what Director Comey eventually said more than 2 months later on July 25, 2016, in recommending no charges against Secretary Clinton. It seems to confirm that the FBI, including the Director, had made up its mind not to charge Secretary Clinton before interviewing her.”

McCabe disputed that characterization, retorting, “It may seem that way reading it now. But I know that Director Comey had not made up his mind at that time.”

is no evidence that Comey tested language to use if charges were to be filed against Clinton. Indeed, McCabe admitted as much when he was asked whether Comey similarly prepared a statement recommending charges in the Clinton email case.

McCabe then repeatedly stated that he is not aware of any other precedent similar to Comey’s draft statement against recommending charges two months before Clinton was interviewed.