Comey’s Draft Statement Exonerating Clinton Two Months before Her FBI Interview Was Not Normal Protocol

WASHINGTON — “This is the only time I am aware of, sir.” “I have not seen that before, sir.” “I’ve never seen that.”

These are just some of the words utilized by former acting FBI director Andrew McCabe when asked during closed door testimony about an email penned by disgraced ex-FBI chief James Comey circulating a draft statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in the private email server case a full two months before the FBI interviewed Clinton and other witnesses in the criminal probe.

Documents previously released by the FBI show that Comey on May 2, 2016 sent the email in question to McCabe, FBI general counsel James Baker and chief of staff and senior counselor James Rybicki. Clinton was interviewed by the FBI on June 2, with Comey later testifying that she was not sworn in and that the interview was not recorded.

Two months before Clinton’s FBI interview, Comey circulated the draft statement testing language to be used for not recommending charges against Clinton.

Former Rep. Bob Goodlatte, who served as chairman of the House Judiciary Committee at the time of McCabe’s December 21, 2017 testimony, read aloud Comey’s email. A transcript of the testimony was released three weeks ago by House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Doug Collins, R-Ga, although the portion in question did not receive media attention.

Trump hails ‘really big night’ for populists in German election after historic victory

Supreme Court chief justice praises outgoing Smithsonian leader who was under pressure from Trump admin

George Bush welcomes top officials to his home state for 9/11 remembrance on 25th anniversary of attacks

Socialist politicians are ‘more racist than the KKK,’ says Black Dem official urging voters to ditch El-Sayed

Appeals court upholds order blocking IRS from sharing taxpayer data with ICE

Senator’s daughter wins Democratic nod in closely watched race to replace outgoing Dem incumbent

Data shows Amazon jet’s key braking systems did not deploy during deadly Miami crash: NTSB

Ex-Dem lobbyist for company that promoted addictive opioid clears key gubernatorial hurdle

Wife of top ex-Biden advisor easily advances to House showdown in November

Cold case takes grim turn after remains identified as runaway teen; homicide investigation underway

Establishment Dem defeats socialist challenger in crucial battleground Senate primary

Incumbent GOP governor rolls to primary victory after keeping Trump at a distance

New Hampshire Senate race set between John Sununu and Chris Pappas

Nancy Pelosi Disclosed a Multi-Million Dollar AI Investment Just Weeks Before the Stock Blew Up

Turning Point Condemns Georgetown ‘Mockers and Trolls’ Planning Event for Charlie Kirk’s Death Anniversary

Goodlatte read Comey’s email as follows:

The penultimate paragraph of the May 2 draft reads as follows: Accordingly, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters such as this, I am completing the investigation by expressing to Justice my view that no charges are appropriate in this case.

Goodlatte noted that “this paragraph is virtually identical to what Director Comey eventually said more than 2 months later on July 25, 2016, in recommending no charges against Secretary Clinton. It seems to confirm that the FBI, including the Director, had made up its mind not to charge Secretary Clinton before interviewing her.”

McCabe disputed that characterization, retorting, “It may seem that way reading it now. But I know that Director Comey had not made up his mind at that time.”

is no evidence that Comey tested language to use if charges were to be filed against Clinton. Indeed, McCabe admitted as much when he was asked whether Comey similarly prepared a statement recommending charges in the Clinton email case.

McCabe then repeatedly stated that he is not aware of any other precedent similar to Comey’s draft statement against recommending charges two months before Clinton was interviewed.