Comey’s Draft Statement Exonerating Clinton Two Months before Her FBI Interview Was Not Normal Protocol

WASHINGTON — “This is the only time I am aware of, sir.” “I have not seen that before, sir.” “I’ve never seen that.”

These are just some of the words utilized by former acting FBI director Andrew McCabe when asked during closed door testimony about an email penned by disgraced ex-FBI chief James Comey circulating a draft statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in the private email server case a full two months before the FBI interviewed Clinton and other witnesses in the criminal probe.

Documents previously released by the FBI show that Comey on May 2, 2016 sent the email in question to McCabe, FBI general counsel James Baker and chief of staff and senior counselor James Rybicki. Clinton was interviewed by the FBI on June 2, with Comey later testifying that she was not sworn in and that the interview was not recorded.

Two months before Clinton’s FBI interview, Comey circulated the draft statement testing language to be used for not recommending charges against Clinton.

Former Rep. Bob Goodlatte, who served as chairman of the House Judiciary Committee at the time of McCabe’s December 21, 2017 testimony, read aloud Comey’s email. A transcript of the testimony was released three weeks ago by House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Doug Collins, R-Ga, although the portion in question did not receive media attention.

This Couple Trapped Children in a Trailer for Years: Now Florida Is Seeking the Death Penalty

Abdul El-Sayed touts ‘whole a–’ medical credentials while defending sex changes for children

God Took Me from Deformity, a Basement, and Agoraphobia to the Atlanta Hawks Locker Room

Any ‘Iran Deal’ Must Include Justice for American Victims of State-Sponsored Terrorism

Liberal Donors, Corporate Interests Conspire to Help Left-Leaning Republicans in Deep Red Wyoming

White House unloads on violent ‘criminal alien’ nabbed after investigators uncover election offense

NBC beefs up security at ‘Today’ studio after Nancy Guthrie kidnapping, intruder incident

What does ‘Never Forget’ mean for a generation with no memory of 9/11?

If the US cuts funding to Israel, could Jordan and Egypt be next?

Have the Left and Right switched places on globalization and consumerism?

PBS’s ‘Marble Hall Murders’ features lovely locales, artful acting, and transfixing twists

Trump says he would ‘love’ to see Ireland unified as one nation

New York City Council pushes bill to take press passes away from ‘Mangionistas’

Newsom concedes California’s housing crisis is fair criticism

‘Disgusting Excuse for a Journalist’: NBC Boston Ripped to Shreds Over Hit Piece on Clancy Holdout Juror

Goodlatte read Comey’s email as follows:

The penultimate paragraph of the May 2 draft reads as follows: Accordingly, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters such as this, I am completing the investigation by expressing to Justice my view that no charges are appropriate in this case.

Goodlatte noted that “this paragraph is virtually identical to what Director Comey eventually said more than 2 months later on July 25, 2016, in recommending no charges against Secretary Clinton. It seems to confirm that the FBI, including the Director, had made up its mind not to charge Secretary Clinton before interviewing her.”

McCabe disputed that characterization, retorting, “It may seem that way reading it now. But I know that Director Comey had not made up his mind at that time.”

is no evidence that Comey tested language to use if charges were to be filed against Clinton. Indeed, McCabe admitted as much when he was asked whether Comey similarly prepared a statement recommending charges in the Clinton email case.

McCabe then repeatedly stated that he is not aware of any other precedent similar to Comey’s draft statement against recommending charges two months before Clinton was interviewed.