Comey’s Draft Statement Exonerating Clinton Two Months before Her FBI Interview Was Not Normal Protocol

WASHINGTON — “This is the only time I am aware of, sir.” “I have not seen that before, sir.” “I’ve never seen that.”

These are just some of the words utilized by former acting FBI director Andrew McCabe when asked during closed door testimony about an email penned by disgraced ex-FBI chief James Comey circulating a draft statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in the private email server case a full two months before the FBI interviewed Clinton and other witnesses in the criminal probe.

Documents previously released by the FBI show that Comey on May 2, 2016 sent the email in question to McCabe, FBI general counsel James Baker and chief of staff and senior counselor James Rybicki. Clinton was interviewed by the FBI on June 2, with Comey later testifying that she was not sworn in and that the interview was not recorded.

Two months before Clinton’s FBI interview, Comey circulated the draft statement testing language to be used for not recommending charges against Clinton.

Former Rep. Bob Goodlatte, who served as chairman of the House Judiciary Committee at the time of McCabe’s December 21, 2017 testimony, read aloud Comey’s email. A transcript of the testimony was released three weeks ago by House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Doug Collins, R-Ga, although the portion in question did not receive media attention.

GOP triggers marathon Senate fight to expose Dems’ opposition to Trump-backed voter ID bill

Chief Justice Roberts warns against personal attacks on judges as ‘dangerous’ after Trump’s court tirade

Irish President Roasted for ‘Demoralising’ St. Patrick’s Day Message That Replaces Christ with Wokeness

Trump Warns of Permanent Consequences for Every Lawmaker Who Votes Against the SAVE America Act

NYC $30 minimum wage proposal pushed by Mamdani would ‘obliterate’ certain industries: expert warns

Trump bids goodbye to intel official who resigned over Iran: ‘Good thing that he’s out’

The Stunning Story of How Irish Christianity Saved the World

Emerging Intel on Iran’s New Leader Is Hilarious, Painful, and May Well Be Deathly, Too – Apparently He’s Not a Smart Man

NYC rooftop fire casts shadow on St Patrick’s Day Parade

New names emerge in Jack Smith’s wide-ranging bid for GOP lawmakers’ phone records, unearthed emails show

Video shows panicked Spring Break crowds fleeing beach hotspot after reports of five weekend shootings

Top counterterrorism official resigns in protest of US war against Iran

German Law Student Sues for $100K Over Spicy NYC Taco – And That Was Just His Warm-Up Lawsuit

IDF claims it killed top Iranian official Ali Larijani and Basij commander in latest strikes

Trump admin asks Spanberger, Virginia officials not release illegal charged with groping high school girls

Goodlatte read Comey’s email as follows:

The penultimate paragraph of the May 2 draft reads as follows: Accordingly, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters such as this, I am completing the investigation by expressing to Justice my view that no charges are appropriate in this case.

Goodlatte noted that “this paragraph is virtually identical to what Director Comey eventually said more than 2 months later on July 25, 2016, in recommending no charges against Secretary Clinton. It seems to confirm that the FBI, including the Director, had made up its mind not to charge Secretary Clinton before interviewing her.”

McCabe disputed that characterization, retorting, “It may seem that way reading it now. But I know that Director Comey had not made up his mind at that time.”

is no evidence that Comey tested language to use if charges were to be filed against Clinton. Indeed, McCabe admitted as much when he was asked whether Comey similarly prepared a statement recommending charges in the Clinton email case.

McCabe then repeatedly stated that he is not aware of any other precedent similar to Comey’s draft statement against recommending charges two months before Clinton was interviewed.