Comey’s Draft Statement Exonerating Clinton Two Months before Her FBI Interview Was Not Normal Protocol

WASHINGTON — “This is the only time I am aware of, sir.” “I have not seen that before, sir.” “I’ve never seen that.”

These are just some of the words utilized by former acting FBI director Andrew McCabe when asked during closed door testimony about an email penned by disgraced ex-FBI chief James Comey circulating a draft statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in the private email server case a full two months before the FBI interviewed Clinton and other witnesses in the criminal probe.

Documents previously released by the FBI show that Comey on May 2, 2016 sent the email in question to McCabe, FBI general counsel James Baker and chief of staff and senior counselor James Rybicki. Clinton was interviewed by the FBI on June 2, with Comey later testifying that she was not sworn in and that the interview was not recorded.

Two months before Clinton’s FBI interview, Comey circulated the draft statement testing language to be used for not recommending charges against Clinton.

Former Rep. Bob Goodlatte, who served as chairman of the House Judiciary Committee at the time of McCabe’s December 21, 2017 testimony, read aloud Comey’s email. A transcript of the testimony was released three weeks ago by House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Doug Collins, R-Ga, although the portion in question did not receive media attention.

Luigi Mangione said ‘all these people here for a mass murder, why?’ at arraignment: police officer

New Jersey twins arrested for threatening to kill DHS spokeswoman and ICE officers

DOJ fights major obstacle to bring new case against Comey

Gene Simmons says musician royalty act is about protecting the next Elvis Presley

Vermont school district flies Somali flag amid massive fraud investigation in divisive move: GOP chair

Lawsuit: Man Died After Royal Caribbean Served Him Dozens of Alcoholic Beverages and Sedated Him

Trump Cranks Up the Pressure on Defiant Zelenskyy, Says He Must ‘Start Accepting Things’

Kamala Harris declares herself a ‘historic’ figure: ‘There will be a marble bust of me’

GOP senator pitches ‘Black Friday’ Obamacare fix that bridges Democrat, Republican demands

Judge allows DOJ to release Ghislaine Maxwell grand jury transcripts

Watch: Dem. Rep. Spins Out After Learning Trump Has Officially Restored Biden’s HHS Sec. ‘Rachel’ Levine’s Name to Richard at HHS HQ

Mamdani Chooses Felon Rapper Who Served 7 Years in Prison for Key Criminal Justice Position

House Democrat drops re-election bid after Texas redraws congressional map

GOP lawmaker unveils bill to ensure fathers shoulder 50% of pregnancy expenses

University of Oklahoma removes professor for alleged discrimination related to TA who gave Christian student 0

Goodlatte read Comey’s email as follows:

The penultimate paragraph of the May 2 draft reads as follows: Accordingly, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters such as this, I am completing the investigation by expressing to Justice my view that no charges are appropriate in this case.

Goodlatte noted that “this paragraph is virtually identical to what Director Comey eventually said more than 2 months later on July 25, 2016, in recommending no charges against Secretary Clinton. It seems to confirm that the FBI, including the Director, had made up its mind not to charge Secretary Clinton before interviewing her.”

McCabe disputed that characterization, retorting, “It may seem that way reading it now. But I know that Director Comey had not made up his mind at that time.”

is no evidence that Comey tested language to use if charges were to be filed against Clinton. Indeed, McCabe admitted as much when he was asked whether Comey similarly prepared a statement recommending charges in the Clinton email case.

McCabe then repeatedly stated that he is not aware of any other precedent similar to Comey’s draft statement against recommending charges two months before Clinton was interviewed.