Comey’s Draft Statement Exonerating Clinton Two Months before Her FBI Interview Was Not Normal Protocol

WASHINGTON — “This is the only time I am aware of, sir.” “I have not seen that before, sir.” “I’ve never seen that.”

These are just some of the words utilized by former acting FBI director Andrew McCabe when asked during closed door testimony about an email penned by disgraced ex-FBI chief James Comey circulating a draft statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in the private email server case a full two months before the FBI interviewed Clinton and other witnesses in the criminal probe.

Documents previously released by the FBI show that Comey on May 2, 2016 sent the email in question to McCabe, FBI general counsel James Baker and chief of staff and senior counselor James Rybicki. Clinton was interviewed by the FBI on June 2, with Comey later testifying that she was not sworn in and that the interview was not recorded.

Two months before Clinton’s FBI interview, Comey circulated the draft statement testing language to be used for not recommending charges against Clinton.

Former Rep. Bob Goodlatte, who served as chairman of the House Judiciary Committee at the time of McCabe’s December 21, 2017 testimony, read aloud Comey’s email. A transcript of the testimony was released three weeks ago by House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Doug Collins, R-Ga, although the portion in question did not receive media attention.

House narrowly backs allowing troops, Pentagon workers to carry personal guns on military bases

Progressive wave crashes in Sun Belt battleground as moderate holds his seat

House GOP votes to punt government shutdown battle to after November midterms

Woman’s remains identified by DNA in Virginia, exposing second alleged murder linked to same 4 suspects

Mamdani goes back on campaign promise, says NYC can’t arrest Netanyahu

Watch: Leftist Witness Confused by Jasmine Crockett’s Wild ‘Racism’ Claim About the World Cup Final

Alleged ‘mime’ stalker stripped to underwear, covered himself in cooking oil: officials

Watch: Dog Moves Like Lightning to Protect Her Boy from Charging Black Bear and Gets the Job Done

David Hogg Rips DNC’s Campaign Arm as ‘Evil’ and Says Top Party Fundraisers ‘Pick Terrible Candidates’

Slack messages released by Rand Paul appear to show authors of key COVID-19 origin paper held private doubts

WATCH: Smithsonian director pressed on woke exhibits: ‘Is Mickey Mouse racist?’

Peter Navarro contempt of Congress conviction upheld by appeals court

FBI Director Kash Patel to Make Rare Trip to Russia: Report

Todd Blanche faces lingering GOP holdouts for attorney general post over ‘anti-weaponization fund’

Zelensky sacks Ukrainian Commander in Chief Syrsky in major military shake-up

Goodlatte read Comey’s email as follows:

The penultimate paragraph of the May 2 draft reads as follows: Accordingly, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters such as this, I am completing the investigation by expressing to Justice my view that no charges are appropriate in this case.

Goodlatte noted that “this paragraph is virtually identical to what Director Comey eventually said more than 2 months later on July 25, 2016, in recommending no charges against Secretary Clinton. It seems to confirm that the FBI, including the Director, had made up its mind not to charge Secretary Clinton before interviewing her.”

McCabe disputed that characterization, retorting, “It may seem that way reading it now. But I know that Director Comey had not made up his mind at that time.”

is no evidence that Comey tested language to use if charges were to be filed against Clinton. Indeed, McCabe admitted as much when he was asked whether Comey similarly prepared a statement recommending charges in the Clinton email case.

McCabe then repeatedly stated that he is not aware of any other precedent similar to Comey’s draft statement against recommending charges two months before Clinton was interviewed.