Comey’s Draft Statement Exonerating Clinton Two Months before Her FBI Interview Was Not Normal Protocol

WASHINGTON — “This is the only time I am aware of, sir.” “I have not seen that before, sir.” “I’ve never seen that.”

These are just some of the words utilized by former acting FBI director Andrew McCabe when asked during closed door testimony about an email penned by disgraced ex-FBI chief James Comey circulating a draft statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in the private email server case a full two months before the FBI interviewed Clinton and other witnesses in the criminal probe.

Documents previously released by the FBI show that Comey on May 2, 2016 sent the email in question to McCabe, FBI general counsel James Baker and chief of staff and senior counselor James Rybicki. Clinton was interviewed by the FBI on June 2, with Comey later testifying that she was not sworn in and that the interview was not recorded.

Two months before Clinton’s FBI interview, Comey circulated the draft statement testing language to be used for not recommending charges against Clinton.

Former Rep. Bob Goodlatte, who served as chairman of the House Judiciary Committee at the time of McCabe’s December 21, 2017 testimony, read aloud Comey’s email. A transcript of the testimony was released three weeks ago by House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Doug Collins, R-Ga, although the portion in question did not receive media attention.

Trump’s go-to Michigan auto worker gets a job and the spotlight

This Isn’t Want Dems Had in Mind: Cali’s Wealth Tax Plan Handed Billionaire Zuckerberg a Massive Pay Increase

Did He Forget About 9/11? Muslim Brotherhood-Connected El-Sayed Said US Was ‘A Lot More Safe’ Under INS

Second Amendment fight moves beyond guns with Supreme Court poised for big ruling

Bush dynasty delivers another blow to GOP in Texas Senate battle as family member breaks ranks

Breaking: US Evacuates Middle East in ‘Sudden Exodus’ as ‘Advanced Stages’ of Iranian Assassination Plots Come to Light

Obama prepares to rally with Michigan Dem who once delivered scathing verdict on his presidency

Omar’s deleted tweet could give clue on alleged brother marriage

Trump’s war on drug cartels could gain powerful new ally after pivotal election

Missouri businesswoman and single mom killed when police SUV responding to emergency crashes into her Audi

Cornell rape accuser can remain ‘Jane Doe’ as judge warns threats could lead to federal charges

The parties have flipped on support for Israel

BLUE WAVE CRUSHED? Frank Luntz Warns CNN of Flawed Polling and Defiant Trump Voters

Alabama man allegedly decapitates family members with chainsaw, hours after 911 warning

DHS Testing Nonlethal Device That Causes ‘Irresistible Urge to Run’ for Use at Border

Goodlatte read Comey’s email as follows:

The penultimate paragraph of the May 2 draft reads as follows: Accordingly, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters such as this, I am completing the investigation by expressing to Justice my view that no charges are appropriate in this case.

Goodlatte noted that “this paragraph is virtually identical to what Director Comey eventually said more than 2 months later on July 25, 2016, in recommending no charges against Secretary Clinton. It seems to confirm that the FBI, including the Director, had made up its mind not to charge Secretary Clinton before interviewing her.”

McCabe disputed that characterization, retorting, “It may seem that way reading it now. But I know that Director Comey had not made up his mind at that time.”

is no evidence that Comey tested language to use if charges were to be filed against Clinton. Indeed, McCabe admitted as much when he was asked whether Comey similarly prepared a statement recommending charges in the Clinton email case.

McCabe then repeatedly stated that he is not aware of any other precedent similar to Comey’s draft statement against recommending charges two months before Clinton was interviewed.