Comey’s Draft Statement Exonerating Clinton Two Months before Her FBI Interview Was Not Normal Protocol

WASHINGTON — “This is the only time I am aware of, sir.” “I have not seen that before, sir.” “I’ve never seen that.”

These are just some of the words utilized by former acting FBI director Andrew McCabe when asked during closed door testimony about an email penned by disgraced ex-FBI chief James Comey circulating a draft statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in the private email server case a full two months before the FBI interviewed Clinton and other witnesses in the criminal probe.

Documents previously released by the FBI show that Comey on May 2, 2016 sent the email in question to McCabe, FBI general counsel James Baker and chief of staff and senior counselor James Rybicki. Clinton was interviewed by the FBI on June 2, with Comey later testifying that she was not sworn in and that the interview was not recorded.

Two months before Clinton’s FBI interview, Comey circulated the draft statement testing language to be used for not recommending charges against Clinton.

Former Rep. Bob Goodlatte, who served as chairman of the House Judiciary Committee at the time of McCabe’s December 21, 2017 testimony, read aloud Comey’s email. A transcript of the testimony was released three weeks ago by House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Doug Collins, R-Ga, although the portion in question did not receive media attention.

Fox News President Issues Defiant Response to Trump’s Criticism: ‘It’s What We Do’

Andrews says she doesn’t support gender surgeries for minors after previously advocating against a ban

Russia denies another plague case as WHO presses for more information

Taxpayer-funded autism giant faces scrutiny over abuse cases and billing as Trump targets healthcare fraud

Rally Crowd Chants ‘Where Is James Talarico’ as Senate Candidate Disappears from Campaign Trail for 11 Days

Letitia James’ underdog rival turns AG’s own playbook against her with scathing 52-count campaign ‘indictment’

Hillary Clinton issues endorsement in US midterm elections

Ithaca council halts Cornell event permits amid scrutiny over handling of rape allegations

Trump Responds After Two of His Top Advisers’ Foreign Work Sparks Backlash, Threatens Termination ‘If There’s a Conflict’

California woman accused of spying for China fights detention with $820K in proposed security

The Warning Signs Were There: Jelly Roll’s Comments About Zach Bryan Now Make All the Sense in the World

House Republican warns CBDC ‘communist money’ could lead US to ‘dystopian’ future

Lawsuit accuses Dearborn, Michigan, of being ‘hostile to Christians and Jews’ with Islamic displays

Wes Moore’s 2028 dodge complicates reelection pitch in Maryland

Former corrections officer accused of killing wife, forcing kids to help

Goodlatte read Comey’s email as follows:

The penultimate paragraph of the May 2 draft reads as follows: Accordingly, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters such as this, I am completing the investigation by expressing to Justice my view that no charges are appropriate in this case.

Goodlatte noted that “this paragraph is virtually identical to what Director Comey eventually said more than 2 months later on July 25, 2016, in recommending no charges against Secretary Clinton. It seems to confirm that the FBI, including the Director, had made up its mind not to charge Secretary Clinton before interviewing her.”

McCabe disputed that characterization, retorting, “It may seem that way reading it now. But I know that Director Comey had not made up his mind at that time.”

is no evidence that Comey tested language to use if charges were to be filed against Clinton. Indeed, McCabe admitted as much when he was asked whether Comey similarly prepared a statement recommending charges in the Clinton email case.

McCabe then repeatedly stated that he is not aware of any other precedent similar to Comey’s draft statement against recommending charges two months before Clinton was interviewed.