Comey’s Draft Statement Exonerating Clinton Two Months before Her FBI Interview Was Not Normal Protocol

WASHINGTON — “This is the only time I am aware of, sir.” “I have not seen that before, sir.” “I’ve never seen that.”

These are just some of the words utilized by former acting FBI director Andrew McCabe when asked during closed door testimony about an email penned by disgraced ex-FBI chief James Comey circulating a draft statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in the private email server case a full two months before the FBI interviewed Clinton and other witnesses in the criminal probe.

Documents previously released by the FBI show that Comey on May 2, 2016 sent the email in question to McCabe, FBI general counsel James Baker and chief of staff and senior counselor James Rybicki. Clinton was interviewed by the FBI on June 2, with Comey later testifying that she was not sworn in and that the interview was not recorded.

Two months before Clinton’s FBI interview, Comey circulated the draft statement testing language to be used for not recommending charges against Clinton.

Former Rep. Bob Goodlatte, who served as chairman of the House Judiciary Committee at the time of McCabe’s December 21, 2017 testimony, read aloud Comey’s email. A transcript of the testimony was released three weeks ago by House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Doug Collins, R-Ga, although the portion in question did not receive media attention.

How a foreign government helped accused Saudi spy’s family flee US after OpenAI bug scandal

Violent far-left riots in France are ‘chilling warning’ for Americans at home, Mike Johnson says

Trump aides fire back at press over Zacharia firing as they seek to limit damage

Convicted serial rapist originally sentenced to 124 years walks free after 20, sparking outrage

Blue State Schools Forced Christians to Keep Bibles in Envelopes So Other Students Wouldn’t Be ‘Exposed to Them’

Elon Musk Announces Plan to Distribute a Financial Gift to ‘Every Kid in America’

Trump heads to unlikely battleground as GOP fights to hold Senate and more top headlines

State Trooper Dishonorably Discharged for Using ‘Offensive Language’

It took 3 months to get inside this massive Texas data center — here’s what we saw

What’s next for Skydance after the Paramount-Warner Bros. merger?

National Guard member shot in DC, police chief says

Epstein-linked billionaire pours $500K into super PAC backing Kentucky Democrat: ‘Dirty Epstein-class money’

Booker rival who ‘shoots from the hip’ hopes viral debate moment can break GOP’s Senate drought

Firefighters save historic ‘Godfather’ church from raging NYC warehouse blaze

Arizona man accused of plotting mass casualty attack on religious site with ‘cookbook’ tied to OKC bombing

Goodlatte read Comey’s email as follows:

The penultimate paragraph of the May 2 draft reads as follows: Accordingly, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters such as this, I am completing the investigation by expressing to Justice my view that no charges are appropriate in this case.

Goodlatte noted that “this paragraph is virtually identical to what Director Comey eventually said more than 2 months later on July 25, 2016, in recommending no charges against Secretary Clinton. It seems to confirm that the FBI, including the Director, had made up its mind not to charge Secretary Clinton before interviewing her.”

McCabe disputed that characterization, retorting, “It may seem that way reading it now. But I know that Director Comey had not made up his mind at that time.”

is no evidence that Comey tested language to use if charges were to be filed against Clinton. Indeed, McCabe admitted as much when he was asked whether Comey similarly prepared a statement recommending charges in the Clinton email case.

McCabe then repeatedly stated that he is not aware of any other precedent similar to Comey’s draft statement against recommending charges two months before Clinton was interviewed.