Comey’s Draft Statement Exonerating Clinton Two Months before Her FBI Interview Was Not Normal Protocol

WASHINGTON — “This is the only time I am aware of, sir.” “I have not seen that before, sir.” “I’ve never seen that.”

These are just some of the words utilized by former acting FBI director Andrew McCabe when asked during closed door testimony about an email penned by disgraced ex-FBI chief James Comey circulating a draft statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in the private email server case a full two months before the FBI interviewed Clinton and other witnesses in the criminal probe.

Documents previously released by the FBI show that Comey on May 2, 2016 sent the email in question to McCabe, FBI general counsel James Baker and chief of staff and senior counselor James Rybicki. Clinton was interviewed by the FBI on June 2, with Comey later testifying that she was not sworn in and that the interview was not recorded.

Two months before Clinton’s FBI interview, Comey circulated the draft statement testing language to be used for not recommending charges against Clinton.

Former Rep. Bob Goodlatte, who served as chairman of the House Judiciary Committee at the time of McCabe’s December 21, 2017 testimony, read aloud Comey’s email. A transcript of the testimony was released three weeks ago by House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Doug Collins, R-Ga, although the portion in question did not receive media attention.

Socialists take fight west, target Colorado in latest bid to oust Democratic Party establishment

Fetterman unleashes on ‘dirtbag’ wing of Dems after far-left victories: ‘Orgy of socialism’

Trump supporters rip Amy Coney Barrett after Supreme Court setbacks

A California dog rescue hid a grim secret: more than 100 dogs buried beneath it

DuckDuckGo’s AI Assistant Claims Trump and Vance Have Died from Rabies

CBS crew attacked by multiple men near Chicago museum, suspects arrested: police

That Thing That ‘Never Happens’ Happened Again – NYC Clerk Caught Fixing Election with Oversize Garbage Can Filled with Ballots – Court Docs

Helicopter reports drone encounter near JFK hours after JetBlue’s possible drone strike

Trump taps acting Labor Secretary Keith Sonderling for permanent role pending Senate confirmation

Clarence Thomas Irks MSNOW Reporter by Laughing Off Questions at Capitol

San Francisco archdiocese agrees to $395M settlement with 530 clergy abuse survivors

Ex-NFL Superstar Chris Johnson, 40, Diagnosed with ALS, Can No Longer Speak

Alaska Supreme Court allows second Dan Sullivan to appear on ballot

Watch: Radical Leftist Scott Weiner Roasted – Deranged Pride Activists Encircle, Attack Him for Not Being Woke Enough

US and Iran Reach New Agreement After Days of Trading Strikes

Goodlatte read Comey’s email as follows:

The penultimate paragraph of the May 2 draft reads as follows: Accordingly, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters such as this, I am completing the investigation by expressing to Justice my view that no charges are appropriate in this case.

Goodlatte noted that “this paragraph is virtually identical to what Director Comey eventually said more than 2 months later on July 25, 2016, in recommending no charges against Secretary Clinton. It seems to confirm that the FBI, including the Director, had made up its mind not to charge Secretary Clinton before interviewing her.”

McCabe disputed that characterization, retorting, “It may seem that way reading it now. But I know that Director Comey had not made up his mind at that time.”

is no evidence that Comey tested language to use if charges were to be filed against Clinton. Indeed, McCabe admitted as much when he was asked whether Comey similarly prepared a statement recommending charges in the Clinton email case.

McCabe then repeatedly stated that he is not aware of any other precedent similar to Comey’s draft statement against recommending charges two months before Clinton was interviewed.