Comey’s Draft Statement Exonerating Clinton Two Months before Her FBI Interview Was Not Normal Protocol

WASHINGTON — “This is the only time I am aware of, sir.” “I have not seen that before, sir.” “I’ve never seen that.”

These are just some of the words utilized by former acting FBI director Andrew McCabe when asked during closed door testimony about an email penned by disgraced ex-FBI chief James Comey circulating a draft statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in the private email server case a full two months before the FBI interviewed Clinton and other witnesses in the criminal probe.

Documents previously released by the FBI show that Comey on May 2, 2016 sent the email in question to McCabe, FBI general counsel James Baker and chief of staff and senior counselor James Rybicki. Clinton was interviewed by the FBI on June 2, with Comey later testifying that she was not sworn in and that the interview was not recorded.

Two months before Clinton’s FBI interview, Comey circulated the draft statement testing language to be used for not recommending charges against Clinton.

Former Rep. Bob Goodlatte, who served as chairman of the House Judiciary Committee at the time of McCabe’s December 21, 2017 testimony, read aloud Comey’s email. A transcript of the testimony was released three weeks ago by House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Doug Collins, R-Ga, although the portion in question did not receive media attention.

AOC doubles down on call for Trump’s ouster even after ceasefire announcement

Inside Antifa-linked group’s plan to ‘structurally change’ the US as May Day unrest approaches

Michigan Senate hopeful Abdul El-Sayed’s unapologetic embrace of Hasan Piker

Terror suspects indicted after allegedly throwing bombs at NYC protest outside mayor’s mansion

A-10 Warthog given new maritime role targeting boats in Iran after efforts to retire aircraft

Breaking: Oil Plummets After Trump Announces Iran Ceasefire

Abortion pill mifepristone stays available by mail for now as FDA faces 6-month review deadline

Pope Leo calls out Trump’s Iran rhetoric before last-minute ceasefire emerges

Liberals tighten grip on battleground state Supreme Court in low-key but high-stakes election

American couple chasing retirement dream in Bahamas boating mystery were ‘inexperienced’: Friend

Swalwell campaign rejects ‘outrageous’ allegations of sexual misconduct as Dem activists issue viral warning

Watch: The Country Would ‘Come Unglued’ – Tim Burchett Reveals Alien Life Briefing He Attended 2 Weeks Ago

Texas man tackled by church security after bringing loaded gun, ammo to Houston service

ESPN Set to Begin Layoffs Due to ‘Unexpected Revenue Dip’: Report

Trump-backed Republican pads GOP’s fragile House majority by winning showdown for MTG’s former seat

Goodlatte read Comey’s email as follows:

The penultimate paragraph of the May 2 draft reads as follows: Accordingly, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters such as this, I am completing the investigation by expressing to Justice my view that no charges are appropriate in this case.

Goodlatte noted that “this paragraph is virtually identical to what Director Comey eventually said more than 2 months later on July 25, 2016, in recommending no charges against Secretary Clinton. It seems to confirm that the FBI, including the Director, had made up its mind not to charge Secretary Clinton before interviewing her.”

McCabe disputed that characterization, retorting, “It may seem that way reading it now. But I know that Director Comey had not made up his mind at that time.”

is no evidence that Comey tested language to use if charges were to be filed against Clinton. Indeed, McCabe admitted as much when he was asked whether Comey similarly prepared a statement recommending charges in the Clinton email case.

McCabe then repeatedly stated that he is not aware of any other precedent similar to Comey’s draft statement against recommending charges two months before Clinton was interviewed.