Comey’s Draft Statement Exonerating Clinton Two Months before Her FBI Interview Was Not Normal Protocol

WASHINGTON — “This is the only time I am aware of, sir.” “I have not seen that before, sir.” “I’ve never seen that.”

These are just some of the words utilized by former acting FBI director Andrew McCabe when asked during closed door testimony about an email penned by disgraced ex-FBI chief James Comey circulating a draft statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in the private email server case a full two months before the FBI interviewed Clinton and other witnesses in the criminal probe.

Documents previously released by the FBI show that Comey on May 2, 2016 sent the email in question to McCabe, FBI general counsel James Baker and chief of staff and senior counselor James Rybicki. Clinton was interviewed by the FBI on June 2, with Comey later testifying that she was not sworn in and that the interview was not recorded.

Two months before Clinton’s FBI interview, Comey circulated the draft statement testing language to be used for not recommending charges against Clinton.

Former Rep. Bob Goodlatte, who served as chairman of the House Judiciary Committee at the time of McCabe’s December 21, 2017 testimony, read aloud Comey’s email. A transcript of the testimony was released three weeks ago by House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Doug Collins, R-Ga, although the portion in question did not receive media attention.

Nancy Guthrie video may have been erased after FBI kept out for days, director says

Florida man arrested in IHOP restaurant after police say he stabbed a rideshare driver

Dem ‘Epstein class’ attack backfires as top candidates funded by Epstein-tied billionaire

Muslim Dem Candidate Exposes Flaw in Wokeness Allyship, Now Says She’s Getting Silenced Because She Didn’t Embrace LGBT Agenda

Cuba built covert network inside America through spies, activists and universities, State Dept alleges

Pentagon Releases Video of Latest Strikes on Iran After Trump Orders Revenge for Fallen US Troops

Two House races take center stage as conservative PAC launches multimillion-dollar Big Tech push

Jeff Clark’s yearslong disbarment fight tests reach of DC Bar over Trump DOJ

Trump’s GOP clout faces Arizona test with House majority, governor’s race at stake

DOJ’s creative solution to transgender prison case would move male inmates into specialized unit

DOJ opens probe into Harvard’s financial aid for alleged discrimination against American students

Bodycam catches Sunny Hostin invoking her legal chops as cops cite Harvard-grad son for trespassing

Trump says first call with new UK PM Burnham went ‘very well,’ pledges US support

Lindsey Graham’s Sister Announces She’s Running for Full Senate Term

Rand Paul releases docs that reveal FBI halted border inspection of virus researcher over Wuhan lab links

Goodlatte read Comey’s email as follows:

The penultimate paragraph of the May 2 draft reads as follows: Accordingly, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters such as this, I am completing the investigation by expressing to Justice my view that no charges are appropriate in this case.

Goodlatte noted that “this paragraph is virtually identical to what Director Comey eventually said more than 2 months later on July 25, 2016, in recommending no charges against Secretary Clinton. It seems to confirm that the FBI, including the Director, had made up its mind not to charge Secretary Clinton before interviewing her.”

McCabe disputed that characterization, retorting, “It may seem that way reading it now. But I know that Director Comey had not made up his mind at that time.”

is no evidence that Comey tested language to use if charges were to be filed against Clinton. Indeed, McCabe admitted as much when he was asked whether Comey similarly prepared a statement recommending charges in the Clinton email case.

McCabe then repeatedly stated that he is not aware of any other precedent similar to Comey’s draft statement against recommending charges two months before Clinton was interviewed.