Comey’s Draft Statement Exonerating Clinton Two Months before Her FBI Interview Was Not Normal Protocol

WASHINGTON — “This is the only time I am aware of, sir.” “I have not seen that before, sir.” “I’ve never seen that.”

These are just some of the words utilized by former acting FBI director Andrew McCabe when asked during closed door testimony about an email penned by disgraced ex-FBI chief James Comey circulating a draft statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in the private email server case a full two months before the FBI interviewed Clinton and other witnesses in the criminal probe.

Documents previously released by the FBI show that Comey on May 2, 2016 sent the email in question to McCabe, FBI general counsel James Baker and chief of staff and senior counselor James Rybicki. Clinton was interviewed by the FBI on June 2, with Comey later testifying that she was not sworn in and that the interview was not recorded.

Two months before Clinton’s FBI interview, Comey circulated the draft statement testing language to be used for not recommending charges against Clinton.

Former Rep. Bob Goodlatte, who served as chairman of the House Judiciary Committee at the time of McCabe’s December 21, 2017 testimony, read aloud Comey’s email. A transcript of the testimony was released three weeks ago by House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Doug Collins, R-Ga, although the portion in question did not receive media attention.

Suspect in Pittsburgh doctor’s murder had been released without bail on prior burglary charge: court docs

When Politicians Call Data Centers ‘100% Renewable,’ They May Not Mean What You Think

Dem Gov. of NJ Tells Her Hand-Picked Lt. Gov. to Get Out as Investigation Points to Sordid Sexual Past

Iranian president denies nuclear ambitions while blaming US for Middle East conflict and more top headlines

‘Castro’s playbook’: Ex-AG warns dozens of congressional bills are pushing socialist ideas

Xi caps Trump state visit with symbolic final stop before leaving Washington

As Trump’s popularity plummets, House Democratic target emerges in red Indiana

California voter ID ballot measure could be rare GOP statewide win

How the midterm elections will set Democrats up for 2028 success or failure

The Big Bad Guy Behind Unaffordable Housing Almost No One Names: Zoning Laws

Donalds rips opponent’s ‘complete 180’ as Dem’s own 2016 words come back to haunt him in tightening gov race

WATCH: Mike Lee explodes on voting error that ‘keeps happening’ as huge number of noncitizens found on rolls

UMass Dartmouth football murder suspect overstayed tourist visa, received deferred action: federal sources

Pittsburgh doctor stabbed to death after intruder allegedly attacks him, wife as they slept: police

New Jersey Gov Mikie Sherrill calls on lieutenant governor to resign after sexual harassment investigation

Goodlatte read Comey’s email as follows:

The penultimate paragraph of the May 2 draft reads as follows: Accordingly, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters such as this, I am completing the investigation by expressing to Justice my view that no charges are appropriate in this case.

Goodlatte noted that “this paragraph is virtually identical to what Director Comey eventually said more than 2 months later on July 25, 2016, in recommending no charges against Secretary Clinton. It seems to confirm that the FBI, including the Director, had made up its mind not to charge Secretary Clinton before interviewing her.”

McCabe disputed that characterization, retorting, “It may seem that way reading it now. But I know that Director Comey had not made up his mind at that time.”

is no evidence that Comey tested language to use if charges were to be filed against Clinton. Indeed, McCabe admitted as much when he was asked whether Comey similarly prepared a statement recommending charges in the Clinton email case.

McCabe then repeatedly stated that he is not aware of any other precedent similar to Comey’s draft statement against recommending charges two months before Clinton was interviewed.