Comey’s Draft Statement Exonerating Clinton Two Months before Her FBI Interview Was Not Normal Protocol

WASHINGTON — “This is the only time I am aware of, sir.” “I have not seen that before, sir.” “I’ve never seen that.”

These are just some of the words utilized by former acting FBI director Andrew McCabe when asked during closed door testimony about an email penned by disgraced ex-FBI chief James Comey circulating a draft statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in the private email server case a full two months before the FBI interviewed Clinton and other witnesses in the criminal probe.

Documents previously released by the FBI show that Comey on May 2, 2016 sent the email in question to McCabe, FBI general counsel James Baker and chief of staff and senior counselor James Rybicki. Clinton was interviewed by the FBI on June 2, with Comey later testifying that she was not sworn in and that the interview was not recorded.

Two months before Clinton’s FBI interview, Comey circulated the draft statement testing language to be used for not recommending charges against Clinton.

Former Rep. Bob Goodlatte, who served as chairman of the House Judiciary Committee at the time of McCabe’s December 21, 2017 testimony, read aloud Comey’s email. A transcript of the testimony was released three weeks ago by House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Doug Collins, R-Ga, although the portion in question did not receive media attention.

Ohio man charged over graphic threats to kill Trump, behead GOP lawmaker

‘Send help’: LA GOP leader issues desperate appeal after Dem mayor’s campaign vid shocks viewers

El-Sayed Finally Scrambles to Distance Himself from Hasan Piker After Piker Openly Threatens Violence Against American Jews

CNN Loses Signal for Half an Hour, Network Blames Tech Issues

Smithsonian-linked museum in El-Sayed’s backyard puts America’s post-9/11 response on trial

Blue state’s water failures could threaten food supplies across US, lawmaker warns

Man Who Threatened to Shoot Thomas Massie Receives Over 2 Years in Prison

Anti-abortion activists worry New Jersey abortion clinic law chills protected speech

Lindsay Clancy trial: Postpartum is real, but child killing demands accountability, veteran prosecutor says

Illegal immigrant accused of fentanyl dealing linked to Virginia high school overdoses

Houston Uber driver caught in wild police chase as officers seen on dashcam video hitching a ride in his car

Trump administration proposes six-figure price tag for new H-1B visas

Trump admin eyes historic mass visa revocation targeting up to 200K asylum seekers: report

Utah teen charged with killing mother, 8-year-old brother as mystery of final hours unravels: police

Watch: Scott Bessent Announces Details of ‘Unprecedented Campaign’ Against ‘Iran and Its Enablers’

Goodlatte read Comey’s email as follows:

The penultimate paragraph of the May 2 draft reads as follows: Accordingly, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters such as this, I am completing the investigation by expressing to Justice my view that no charges are appropriate in this case.

Goodlatte noted that “this paragraph is virtually identical to what Director Comey eventually said more than 2 months later on July 25, 2016, in recommending no charges against Secretary Clinton. It seems to confirm that the FBI, including the Director, had made up its mind not to charge Secretary Clinton before interviewing her.”

McCabe disputed that characterization, retorting, “It may seem that way reading it now. But I know that Director Comey had not made up his mind at that time.”

is no evidence that Comey tested language to use if charges were to be filed against Clinton. Indeed, McCabe admitted as much when he was asked whether Comey similarly prepared a statement recommending charges in the Clinton email case.

McCabe then repeatedly stated that he is not aware of any other precedent similar to Comey’s draft statement against recommending charges two months before Clinton was interviewed.