Comey’s Draft Statement Exonerating Clinton Two Months before Her FBI Interview Was Not Normal Protocol

WASHINGTON — “This is the only time I am aware of, sir.” “I have not seen that before, sir.” “I’ve never seen that.”

These are just some of the words utilized by former acting FBI director Andrew McCabe when asked during closed door testimony about an email penned by disgraced ex-FBI chief James Comey circulating a draft statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in the private email server case a full two months before the FBI interviewed Clinton and other witnesses in the criminal probe.

Documents previously released by the FBI show that Comey on May 2, 2016 sent the email in question to McCabe, FBI general counsel James Baker and chief of staff and senior counselor James Rybicki. Clinton was interviewed by the FBI on June 2, with Comey later testifying that she was not sworn in and that the interview was not recorded.

Two months before Clinton’s FBI interview, Comey circulated the draft statement testing language to be used for not recommending charges against Clinton.

Former Rep. Bob Goodlatte, who served as chairman of the House Judiciary Committee at the time of McCabe’s December 21, 2017 testimony, read aloud Comey’s email. A transcript of the testimony was released three weeks ago by House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Doug Collins, R-Ga, although the portion in question did not receive media attention.

Trump says NYC Mayor Mamdani made ‘big progress’ embracing Declaration of Independence

Watch: Australian News Host Becomes Legend – Starts Speaking Persian and Signs Off with Brutal Curse for Khamenei That She’d Never Get Away with in English

BREAKING: Largest US Base in Middle East Hit by Ballistic Missile from Iran – Details Still Coming In

Watch the most viral moments as Kristi Noem’s hearing goes off the rails

Israel First? MAGA divide erupts over allegations Netanyahu pushed US into Iran conflict

Iran retaliation fears fail to move Democrats on DHS shutdown

Lindsey Graham already moves on from Iran, warns ‘Cuba is next’

Nancy Mace to force vote targeting fellow GOP lawmaker accused of affair with staffer

Trump says ‘losers’ Schumer, Dems would have criticized any decision he made on Iran

Watch: Grateful Kuwaiti Rushes to Help Downed US Pilot, While Leftist Woman Wishes Death to Military Service Members

BREAKING: Black Smoke Rises as New US Consulate Compound Hit by Iranian Strike

Cincinnati mayor opposes judge’s move to grant bail to convicted felon linked to mass shooting gun battle

Austin bar shooting victims named as FBI investigates potential terrorism nexus

State Department deploying military aircraft to evacuate US citizens from Middle East

Michigan Democrats appear hesitant to expand early voting when it could help GOP in state race

Goodlatte read Comey’s email as follows:

The penultimate paragraph of the May 2 draft reads as follows: Accordingly, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters such as this, I am completing the investigation by expressing to Justice my view that no charges are appropriate in this case.

Goodlatte noted that “this paragraph is virtually identical to what Director Comey eventually said more than 2 months later on July 25, 2016, in recommending no charges against Secretary Clinton. It seems to confirm that the FBI, including the Director, had made up its mind not to charge Secretary Clinton before interviewing her.”

McCabe disputed that characterization, retorting, “It may seem that way reading it now. But I know that Director Comey had not made up his mind at that time.”

is no evidence that Comey tested language to use if charges were to be filed against Clinton. Indeed, McCabe admitted as much when he was asked whether Comey similarly prepared a statement recommending charges in the Clinton email case.

McCabe then repeatedly stated that he is not aware of any other precedent similar to Comey’s draft statement against recommending charges two months before Clinton was interviewed.