Researchers from the University of Cornell discovered that artificial intelligence systems designed to identify offensive “hate speech” flag comments purportedly made by minorities “at substantially higher rates” than remarks made by whites.
Several universities maintain artificial intelligence systems designed to monitor social media websites and report users who post “hate speech.” In a study published in May, researchers at Cornell discovered that systems “flag” tweets that likely come from black social media users more often, according to Campus Reform.
The study’s authors found that, according to the AI systems’ definition of abusive speech, “tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates.”
The study also revealed that “black-aligned tweets” are “sexist at almost twice the rate of white-aligned tweets.”
The research team averred that the unexpected findings could be explained by “systematic racial bias” displayed by the human beings who assisted in spotting offensive content.
Child predator among more than 300 nabbed in cannabis farm ICE raid, largest of Trump’s second term
Kash Patel torches ‘conspiracy theories’ about Bondi feud amid MAGA furor over Epstein files
Border czar Tom Homan’s message to anti-ICE protesters: ‘You want some? Come get some’
The Doctor was in (and out): Biden’s physician invokes Fifth Amendment during deposition
Protesters clash with conservatives at Turning Point’s Student Action Summit in Tampa Bay
Trump administration’s Texas flood disaster response ‘fundamentally different’ from Biden’s approach: Noem
Hero or Villain? Supporters Rally Around Doctor Facing Federal Charges Over Fake Vaccine Cards
Trump defends embattled AG Pam Bondi, says ‘nobody cares about’ Jeffrey Epstein
IRS Issues Game-Changing New Guidance to Churches as Trump Notches Another Win for Christians
Trump Admin Responds to Farmer Backlash on Deportation, Launches New Program: Report
Trump threatens to revoke Rosie O’Donnell’s citizenship
White House Trolls Controversial ‘Superman’ Movie with Trump and the Hero’s Iconic, Classic Tagline
Secret Service briefed on threat to Trump ten days before Butler shooting: GAO
Largest US Teacher’s Union Makes Embarrassing Mistake as It Labels Trump a ‘Fascist’
Polarizing NBA Legend’s Daughter Rips Into ESPN for Mentioning Her Father
“The results show evidence of systematic racial bias in all datasets, as classifiers trained on them tend to predict that tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates,” reads the study’s abstract. “If these abusive language detection systems are used in the field they will, therefore, have a disproportionate negative impact on African-American social media users.”
One of the study’s authors said that “internal biases” may be to blame for why “we may see language written in what linguists consider African American English and be more likely to think that it’s something that is offensive.”
Automated technology for identifying hate speech is not new, nor are universities the only parties developing it. Two years ago, Google unveiled its own system called “Perspective,” designed to rate phrases and sentences based on how “toxic” they might be.
Shortly after the release of Perspective, YouTube user Tormental made a video of the program at work, alleging inconsistencies in implementation.
According to Tormental, the system rated prejudicial comments against minorities as more “toxic” than equivalent statements against white people.
Google’s system showed a similar discrepancy for bigoted comments directed at women versus men.
Story cited here.
