Researchers from the University of Cornell discovered that artificial intelligence systems designed to identify offensive “hate speech” flag comments purportedly made by minorities “at substantially higher rates” than remarks made by whites.
Several universities maintain artificial intelligence systems designed to monitor social media websites and report users who post “hate speech.” In a study published in May, researchers at Cornell discovered that systems “flag” tweets that likely come from black social media users more often, according to Campus Reform.
The study’s authors found that, according to the AI systems’ definition of abusive speech, “tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates.”
The study also revealed that “black-aligned tweets” are “sexist at almost twice the rate of white-aligned tweets.”
The research team averred that the unexpected findings could be explained by “systematic racial bias” displayed by the human beings who assisted in spotting offensive content.
Karoline Leavitt Shreds New York Times’ ‘Pitiful’ Report About Trump’s Cabinet and Elon Musk
AOC ‘going on the offense’ to rally red-district voters against Trump: report
Freedom Caucus member Anna Paulina Luna joins AOC to push 10% credit card interest rate cap
LeBron James Gets in the Face of ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith in Heated Courtside Confrontation
AOC and Anna Paulina Luna Team Up for Bill That Aims to Make a Trump Campaign Promise Come True
Suspects accused of Iran-backed plot to kill journalist on American soil face trial
It’s a Special Month: Trump Has Big March Proclamation That the DEI Crowd Will Hate
Pentagon losing cutting edge on weapons innovation, needs ‘massive kick in the pants,’ say defense leaders
Newsom’s ties to CCP under microscope in new book exposing alleged corruption: ‘Fleeced American citizens’
DC to begin reconstructing Black Lives Matter Plaza
FBI Director Kash Patel Announces Shock Arrest of US Soldiers: ‘Empowering Adversaries Like China in Betrayal of Our Country’
Why Trump really went after top Democratic law firm Perkins Coie
Trump puts pin in plan to sign DC takeover executive order — for now
How ‘judge shopping’ is shaping the legal fights against President Trump’s agenda in federal court
Four times minor diplomatic spats had a major geopolitical impact
“The results show evidence of systematic racial bias in all datasets, as classifiers trained on them tend to predict that tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates,” reads the study’s abstract. “If these abusive language detection systems are used in the field they will, therefore, have a disproportionate negative impact on African-American social media users.”
One of the study’s authors said that “internal biases” may be to blame for why “we may see language written in what linguists consider African American English and be more likely to think that it’s something that is offensive.”
Automated technology for identifying hate speech is not new, nor are universities the only parties developing it. Two years ago, Google unveiled its own system called “Perspective,” designed to rate phrases and sentences based on how “toxic” they might be.
Shortly after the release of Perspective, YouTube user Tormental made a video of the program at work, alleging inconsistencies in implementation.
According to Tormental, the system rated prejudicial comments against minorities as more “toxic” than equivalent statements against white people.
Google’s system showed a similar discrepancy for bigoted comments directed at women versus men.
Story cited here.
