Researchers from the University of Cornell discovered that artificial intelligence systems designed to identify offensive “hate speech” flag comments purportedly made by minorities “at substantially higher rates” than remarks made by whites.
Several universities maintain artificial intelligence systems designed to monitor social media websites and report users who post “hate speech.” In a study published in May, researchers at Cornell discovered that systems “flag” tweets that likely come from black social media users more often, according to Campus Reform.
The study’s authors found that, according to the AI systems’ definition of abusive speech, “tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates.”
The study also revealed that “black-aligned tweets” are “sexist at almost twice the rate of white-aligned tweets.”
The research team averred that the unexpected findings could be explained by “systematic racial bias” displayed by the human beings who assisted in spotting offensive content.
Latin Kings Gang Member Stole FBI Weapons During Left-Wing Anti-ICE Riot in Minneapolis
Philadelphia’s threat to prosecute ICE could trigger landmark court fight over authority, experts warn
White House torches Newsom as ‘inauthentic slimeball’ after California governor walks back ICE rhetoric
Family Member of Alleged Charlie Kirk Assassin’s Trans Lover Speaks Out
MAHA emerges as GOP 2026 election bright spot — with one major caveat
Shapiro’s White House trip to talk electricity prices could help him in 2026 and 2028
Virginia Democrats move to seize redistricting power, opening door to 4 new left-leaning seats
Crypto industry spent tens of millions influencing now-delayed cryptocurrency regulations
Federal judge restricts ICE agents amid ongoing Minneapolis area protests
IRS confirms Trump-ordered $1,776 ‘Warrior Dividend’ for 1.45M troops is tax-free
Michael Cohen says NY prosecutors ‘pressured and coerced’ him into anti-Trump testimony
911 transcripts, documents detail chaotic scene after ICE agent fatally shot Renee Good
Florida GOP candidate wants 50% ‘sin tax’ on OnlyFans creators to fight ‘cultural degeneracy’
California man arrested for allegedly making online death threats against JD Vance during Disneyland visit
Illegal alien with 24 convictions among ‘worst of the worst’ arrested in Minnesota ICE operation: DHS
“The results show evidence of systematic racial bias in all datasets, as classifiers trained on them tend to predict that tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates,” reads the study’s abstract. “If these abusive language detection systems are used in the field they will, therefore, have a disproportionate negative impact on African-American social media users.”
One of the study’s authors said that “internal biases” may be to blame for why “we may see language written in what linguists consider African American English and be more likely to think that it’s something that is offensive.”
Automated technology for identifying hate speech is not new, nor are universities the only parties developing it. Two years ago, Google unveiled its own system called “Perspective,” designed to rate phrases and sentences based on how “toxic” they might be.
Shortly after the release of Perspective, YouTube user Tormental made a video of the program at work, alleging inconsistencies in implementation.
According to Tormental, the system rated prejudicial comments against minorities as more “toxic” than equivalent statements against white people.
Google’s system showed a similar discrepancy for bigoted comments directed at women versus men.
Story cited here.
