Researchers from the University of Cornell discovered that artificial intelligence systems designed to identify offensive “hate speech” flag comments purportedly made by minorities “at substantially higher rates” than remarks made by whites.
Several universities maintain artificial intelligence systems designed to monitor social media websites and report users who post “hate speech.” In a study published in May, researchers at Cornell discovered that systems “flag” tweets that likely come from black social media users more often, according to Campus Reform.
The study’s authors found that, according to the AI systems’ definition of abusive speech, “tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates.”
The study also revealed that “black-aligned tweets” are “sexist at almost twice the rate of white-aligned tweets.”
The research team averred that the unexpected findings could be explained by “systematic racial bias” displayed by the human beings who assisted in spotting offensive content.
El-Sayed’s threat against GOP rival backfires as conservatives bring receipts: ‘Is Dubai in Florida’
Taxpayer-funded housing for illegal immigrants in GOP’s crosshairs: ‘It’s got to stop’
African Nation Names One of the Continent’s Largest Roads ‘Donald J. Trump Highway’
Democratic Rep. Who Pushed Latest Impeachment Attempt Against Trump Loses Re-Election Bid
Hasan Piker becomes both a Democratic kingmaker — and political liability
Abdul El-Sayed’s Medicare-for-all crusade collides with an awkward contradiction involving his wife
GOP Senate Nominee Mike Rogers Kicks Off Race Against El-Sayed With a Big Swing
‘Large Jewish Dem Donors’ to Back Republican Mike Rogers After El-Sayed Wins Dem Primary: Report
DOJ puts $25 million bounty on US-born cartel leader
Trump’s antitrust point man could reshape Big Tech cases against Google and Apple if confirmed
US revokes Brazilian ambassador’s visa in diplomatic tit-for-tat
Alex Murdaugh’s lawsuit against Rebecca Hill dismissed by judge who says clerk doesn’t owe him for defense
FAA, NTSB investigating possible violation of safety protocol involving Trump, Marine One
Tlaib moves to block ICE airport arrests, says TSA helping target immigrants
Israel strikes Hezbollah in Lebanon as Rome peace talks continue
“The results show evidence of systematic racial bias in all datasets, as classifiers trained on them tend to predict that tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates,” reads the study’s abstract. “If these abusive language detection systems are used in the field they will, therefore, have a disproportionate negative impact on African-American social media users.”
One of the study’s authors said that “internal biases” may be to blame for why “we may see language written in what linguists consider African American English and be more likely to think that it’s something that is offensive.”
Automated technology for identifying hate speech is not new, nor are universities the only parties developing it. Two years ago, Google unveiled its own system called “Perspective,” designed to rate phrases and sentences based on how “toxic” they might be.
Shortly after the release of Perspective, YouTube user Tormental made a video of the program at work, alleging inconsistencies in implementation.
According to Tormental, the system rated prejudicial comments against minorities as more “toxic” than equivalent statements against white people.
Google’s system showed a similar discrepancy for bigoted comments directed at women versus men.
Story cited here.
