Researchers from the University of Cornell discovered that artificial intelligence systems designed to identify offensive “hate speech” flag comments purportedly made by minorities “at substantially higher rates” than remarks made by whites.
Several universities maintain artificial intelligence systems designed to monitor social media websites and report users who post “hate speech.” In a study published in May, researchers at Cornell discovered that systems “flag” tweets that likely come from black social media users more often, according to Campus Reform.
The study’s authors found that, according to the AI systems’ definition of abusive speech, “tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates.”
The study also revealed that “black-aligned tweets” are “sexist at almost twice the rate of white-aligned tweets.”
The research team averred that the unexpected findings could be explained by “systematic racial bias” displayed by the human beings who assisted in spotting offensive content.
Trump drops Marjorie Taylor Greene endorsement, calls her a ‘ranting lunatic,’ hints at backing primary rival
Charlotte promises to resist pending federal immigration raids: ‘Campaign of terror’
Zohran Mamdani tells 1M social media followers to boycott Starbucks amid ongoing worker strike
Antifa members indicted in Texas ICE facility riot, attempted murder of officer
Kai Trump Bounces Back from Rough LGPA Debut: ‘A Lot of Pressure On Her’
DHS Accuses Federal Judge of ‘Putting the Lives of Americans Directly at Risk’ as He Orders Release of 615 Illegal Aliens
Explosive new documentary probes ’80-year global coverup’ of UFO secrets
Woman Pleads Guilty to Stealing $272,205 from a Church, Seemingly Avoids Prison Time
Democrats mocked for ‘out-of-touch’ comments dismissing no tax on tips: ‘Peak elitism’
Tom Brady’s New NYC Store Robbed Less Than Two Weeks After Opening
Ex-judges blast top Trump DOJ official for declaring ‘war’ on courts
Patel pushes back on Tucker Carlson’s Thomas Crooks exposé calling into account FBI investigation
Judge rejects Rep. LaMonica McIver’s bid to toss assault case, says her actions had ‘no legislative purpose’
Eric Swalwell considers jumping into California’s crowded governor’s race
Hunter Biden Spouts Unhinged Conspiracy Theories About Charlie Kirk’s Assassination, Claims it ‘Only Served’ MAGA
“The results show evidence of systematic racial bias in all datasets, as classifiers trained on them tend to predict that tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates,” reads the study’s abstract. “If these abusive language detection systems are used in the field they will, therefore, have a disproportionate negative impact on African-American social media users.”
One of the study’s authors said that “internal biases” may be to blame for why “we may see language written in what linguists consider African American English and be more likely to think that it’s something that is offensive.”
Automated technology for identifying hate speech is not new, nor are universities the only parties developing it. Two years ago, Google unveiled its own system called “Perspective,” designed to rate phrases and sentences based on how “toxic” they might be.
Shortly after the release of Perspective, YouTube user Tormental made a video of the program at work, alleging inconsistencies in implementation.
According to Tormental, the system rated prejudicial comments against minorities as more “toxic” than equivalent statements against white people.
Google’s system showed a similar discrepancy for bigoted comments directed at women versus men.
Story cited here.
