Researchers from the University of Cornell discovered that artificial intelligence systems designed to identify offensive “hate speech” flag comments purportedly made by minorities “at substantially higher rates” than remarks made by whites.
Several universities maintain artificial intelligence systems designed to monitor social media websites and report users who post “hate speech.” In a study published in May, researchers at Cornell discovered that systems “flag” tweets that likely come from black social media users more often, according to Campus Reform.
The study’s authors found that, according to the AI systems’ definition of abusive speech, “tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates.”
The study also revealed that “black-aligned tweets” are “sexist at almost twice the rate of white-aligned tweets.”
The research team averred that the unexpected findings could be explained by “systematic racial bias” displayed by the human beings who assisted in spotting offensive content.
Suspect Targeted the Wrong Woman, Fails to Realize Her Fight to Survive Was Impossible to Overcome: Police
Gun training courses experience surge in sign ups: ‘People don’t want to be the victim anymore’
Deadly Hotel Fire Kills 14, Children Among the Victims
John Fetterman faces new spotlight on health, family drama, sparking online uproar
Two planes do ‘go-arounds’ to avoid military helicopter near Reagan Washington National Airport
Pakistan warns of a ‘nuclear flashpoint,’ urges Trump to step in amid rising tensions with India over Kashmir
Sistine Chapel chimney installed by Vatican fire corps ahead of conclave
Heartbreaking Audio: Garcia’s Wife Describing Brutal Abuse She Suffered from Dems’ ‘Maryland Man’ Hero
Top Senate Armed Services Republican says Trump OMB’s budget ‘shreds to the bone’ military capabilities
Recent NFL Draft Pick Quotes the Bible as He Abruptly Retires Due to Gruesome Injury
King Charles III to open Canadian parliament to underscore ‘sovereignty’ of country
German intelligence designates AfD ‘extremist’ group after becoming country’s most popular party
AOC draws spotlight with Queens town hall as 2028 White House talk swirls
Russell Brand granted conditional bail after appearing in London court
Trump’s surgeon general pick touted as ‘fierce’ MAHA advocate before confirmation hearing
“The results show evidence of systematic racial bias in all datasets, as classifiers trained on them tend to predict that tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates,” reads the study’s abstract. “If these abusive language detection systems are used in the field they will, therefore, have a disproportionate negative impact on African-American social media users.”
One of the study’s authors said that “internal biases” may be to blame for why “we may see language written in what linguists consider African American English and be more likely to think that it’s something that is offensive.”
Automated technology for identifying hate speech is not new, nor are universities the only parties developing it. Two years ago, Google unveiled its own system called “Perspective,” designed to rate phrases and sentences based on how “toxic” they might be.
Shortly after the release of Perspective, YouTube user Tormental made a video of the program at work, alleging inconsistencies in implementation.
According to Tormental, the system rated prejudicial comments against minorities as more “toxic” than equivalent statements against white people.
Google’s system showed a similar discrepancy for bigoted comments directed at women versus men.
Story cited here.
