Researchers from the University of Cornell discovered that artificial intelligence systems designed to identify offensive “hate speech” flag comments purportedly made by minorities “at substantially higher rates” than remarks made by whites.
Several universities maintain artificial intelligence systems designed to monitor social media websites and report users who post “hate speech.” In a study published in May, researchers at Cornell discovered that systems “flag” tweets that likely come from black social media users more often, according to Campus Reform.
The study’s authors found that, according to the AI systems’ definition of abusive speech, “tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates.”
The study also revealed that “black-aligned tweets” are “sexist at almost twice the rate of white-aligned tweets.”
The research team averred that the unexpected findings could be explained by “systematic racial bias” displayed by the human beings who assisted in spotting offensive content.
SEE IT: Florida teen Anna Kepner captured on video dancing at cruise sail away party before mysterious death
Pope Leo to appoint Bishop Ron Hicks as New York archbishop replacing Cardinal Dolan: source
HHS probes Minnesota’s use of billions in federal social service funds amid fraud concerns: report
Breaking: Trump Orders ‘Largest Armada Ever Assembled in the History of South America’ to Blockade Venezuela
Trump declares ‘Venezuelan regime’ a foreign terrorist organization, orders oil tanker blockade
Watch: Brawl Erupts in Mexico City Congress as Female Lawmakers Push, Slap, Yank Hair
Report: At Least 2 of the 5 Leftist New Year’s Eve Bombing Suspects Are Transgender
Rob Reiner’s son Nick charged with two counts of first-degree murder in parents’ stabbing deaths
Trump Reduces Federal Workforce to Lowest Level in a Decade
Mark Kelly spars with Pete Hegseth in classified briefing
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to where we stand with a healthcare package
Trump says ‘fantastic’ Wiles was right to say he has ‘alcoholic’s personality’
201 House Dems vote against bill named after 20-year-old American killed by illegal immigrant teen
JD Vance Responds to Controversial Susie Wiles Interview: ‘Sometimes I Am a Conspiracy Theorist’
CBP officer fires weapon during road rage incident near JFK Airport entrance
“The results show evidence of systematic racial bias in all datasets, as classifiers trained on them tend to predict that tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates,” reads the study’s abstract. “If these abusive language detection systems are used in the field they will, therefore, have a disproportionate negative impact on African-American social media users.”
One of the study’s authors said that “internal biases” may be to blame for why “we may see language written in what linguists consider African American English and be more likely to think that it’s something that is offensive.”
Automated technology for identifying hate speech is not new, nor are universities the only parties developing it. Two years ago, Google unveiled its own system called “Perspective,” designed to rate phrases and sentences based on how “toxic” they might be.
Shortly after the release of Perspective, YouTube user Tormental made a video of the program at work, alleging inconsistencies in implementation.
According to Tormental, the system rated prejudicial comments against minorities as more “toxic” than equivalent statements against white people.
Google’s system showed a similar discrepancy for bigoted comments directed at women versus men.
Story cited here.
