Researchers from the University of Cornell discovered that artificial intelligence systems designed to identify offensive “hate speech” flag comments purportedly made by minorities “at substantially higher rates” than remarks made by whites.
Several universities maintain artificial intelligence systems designed to monitor social media websites and report users who post “hate speech.” In a study published in May, researchers at Cornell discovered that systems “flag” tweets that likely come from black social media users more often, according to Campus Reform.
The study’s authors found that, according to the AI systems’ definition of abusive speech, “tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates.”
The study also revealed that “black-aligned tweets” are “sexist at almost twice the rate of white-aligned tweets.”
The research team averred that the unexpected findings could be explained by “systematic racial bias” displayed by the human beings who assisted in spotting offensive content.
Ted Cruz Unveils Effort to Stop Anti-Christian Persecution in African Country
‘I Couldn’t Play’: Child Thanks Trump for Sending National Guard to Fight Crime
Sherrill pulls out all stops with Obama endorsement, star-studded New Jersey campaign push as race tightens
Trump admin makes Supreme Court plea for National Guard in Chicago after judge denies ‘rebellion’ concern
Fact Check: Is JD Vance ‘Shutting Down’ an Interstate Highway for a Marine Corps Event, as Gavin Newsom Claims?
Competition heats up for Nancy Pelosi’s seat
Jury awards $19M to bystanders wounded by Denver cop in 2022 shooting
‘The pandemic’s over’: GOP, Dem senators spar on camera over costly Obamacare subsidies
Bill Ackman jumps into NYC mayoral fight, says Sliwa must drop or ‘we are toast’
Execution set for twisted killer who taunted police with message in victim’s blood: ‘Catch me if u can’
Trump Announces Major News for ‘Rogue’ Ex-GOP Representative
Trump Ends Zelenskyy Press Briefing with an F-Bomb
White House Staffers Troll Far-Left HuffPost Over Question About Who Suggested Putin Meeting in Hungary: ‘Your Mom Did’
Texas teens arrested in killing of Marine veteran working as rideshare driver
Elise Stefanik Calls Mamdani a ‘Jihadist Communist’ in Response to NYT Hit Piece on His Critics
“The results show evidence of systematic racial bias in all datasets, as classifiers trained on them tend to predict that tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates,” reads the study’s abstract. “If these abusive language detection systems are used in the field they will, therefore, have a disproportionate negative impact on African-American social media users.”
One of the study’s authors said that “internal biases” may be to blame for why “we may see language written in what linguists consider African American English and be more likely to think that it’s something that is offensive.”
Automated technology for identifying hate speech is not new, nor are universities the only parties developing it. Two years ago, Google unveiled its own system called “Perspective,” designed to rate phrases and sentences based on how “toxic” they might be.
Shortly after the release of Perspective, YouTube user Tormental made a video of the program at work, alleging inconsistencies in implementation.
According to Tormental, the system rated prejudicial comments against minorities as more “toxic” than equivalent statements against white people.
Google’s system showed a similar discrepancy for bigoted comments directed at women versus men.
Story cited here.
