Researchers from the University of Cornell discovered that artificial intelligence systems designed to identify offensive “hate speech” flag comments purportedly made by minorities “at substantially higher rates” than remarks made by whites.
Several universities maintain artificial intelligence systems designed to monitor social media websites and report users who post “hate speech.” In a study published in May, researchers at Cornell discovered that systems “flag” tweets that likely come from black social media users more often, according to Campus Reform.
The study’s authors found that, according to the AI systems’ definition of abusive speech, “tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates.”
The study also revealed that “black-aligned tweets” are “sexist at almost twice the rate of white-aligned tweets.”
The research team averred that the unexpected findings could be explained by “systematic racial bias” displayed by the human beings who assisted in spotting offensive content.
Florida’s CAIR threatens lawsuit against DeSantis after he labels group a ‘foreign terrorist’ organization
Top US political figures lend legitimacy to Qatari forum allied with array of anti-American groups
3 people arrested after 7 Providence College students overdose at off-campus party
Trump says New York Times questioning his stamina could be ‘treasonous’
Trump mocks Ilhan Omar’s ‘turban’ in latest anti-Somali tirade
Trump compares real wages under his admin versus Biden’s during speech calling out Dem affordability ‘hoax’
Trump gives update on wounded National Guard member 2 weeks after DC ambush shooting: ‘He got up from bed’
American skydivers reclaim world record from Libya with massive flag jump on Pearl Harbor Day
Trump says Rep. Crockett’s Senate run ‘a gift to Republicans’: ‘Can’t imagine she wins’
$900B defense bill advances to House-wide vote as conservative mutiny threat looms
Trump rips Biden and Democrats over affordability in Pennsylvania: ‘Like Bonnie and Clyde preaching public safety’
New report reveals federal spending per person has ballooned by nearly 10,000% since 1916
Twin Blue-State Punks Meet SWAT Justice After Threatening Medieval Torture, Then Murder of DHS Asst. Dir. Tricia McLaughlin
Plane crash-lands on top of Toyota on Florida freeway following engine trouble
McDonald’s Pulls Unsettling Christmas Commercial After it Sparks Massive Backlash
“The results show evidence of systematic racial bias in all datasets, as classifiers trained on them tend to predict that tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates,” reads the study’s abstract. “If these abusive language detection systems are used in the field they will, therefore, have a disproportionate negative impact on African-American social media users.”
One of the study’s authors said that “internal biases” may be to blame for why “we may see language written in what linguists consider African American English and be more likely to think that it’s something that is offensive.”
Automated technology for identifying hate speech is not new, nor are universities the only parties developing it. Two years ago, Google unveiled its own system called “Perspective,” designed to rate phrases and sentences based on how “toxic” they might be.
Shortly after the release of Perspective, YouTube user Tormental made a video of the program at work, alleging inconsistencies in implementation.
According to Tormental, the system rated prejudicial comments against minorities as more “toxic” than equivalent statements against white people.
Google’s system showed a similar discrepancy for bigoted comments directed at women versus men.
Story cited here.
