Researchers from the University of Cornell discovered that artificial intelligence systems designed to identify offensive “hate speech” flag comments purportedly made by minorities “at substantially higher rates” than remarks made by whites.
Several universities maintain artificial intelligence systems designed to monitor social media websites and report users who post “hate speech.” In a study published in May, researchers at Cornell discovered that systems “flag” tweets that likely come from black social media users more often, according to Campus Reform.
The study’s authors found that, according to the AI systems’ definition of abusive speech, “tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates.”
The study also revealed that “black-aligned tweets” are “sexist at almost twice the rate of white-aligned tweets.”
The research team averred that the unexpected findings could be explained by “systematic racial bias” displayed by the human beings who assisted in spotting offensive content.
AmericaFest honors Target employee Jeanie Beeman after viral video shows calm response to harassment
DNI Gabbard warns ‘Islamist ideology’ threatens Western freedom at AmFest
Jillian Michaels Leaves NYT Race-Baiter Stunned and Confused With Quick Retort: ‘You Know I’m Arab, Right?’
Amazon Apologizes After Delivery Driver Drops Off Package, Allegedly Steals Homeowner’s Cat
Murdaugh lawyer ‘cautiously optimistic’ court clerk’s misconduct could pave way for new trial
San Francisco power outage puts 130,000 in the dark, as self-driving car service stops vehicles in the street
Campaign finance data paint complicated picture for House Republicans as 2026 approaches
After rough 2025 elections, top GOP hopeful says conservatism’s future runs through sound economic message
Media ‘complicity’ blamed as feds say Minnesota fraud crisis could reach $9B: ‘Shown their true colors’
Liberal Berates Target Employee Over Charlie Kirk ‘Freedom’ Shirt, Highlighting the Left’s Growing Intolerance
Police Chief Who Groveled After Discussing ‘East African Crime’ Uses Christmas Story to Pander to Somalis Again
FBI Director Kash Patel says bureau ramping up AI to counter domestic, global threats
ICE lodges detainer for illegal immigrant charged in brutal killing of New York taxi driver
DHS fires back at Senate Dems over ICE detainee death claims: ‘Trying to twist data’
Trump endorses Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman for New York governor after Stefanik exit
“The results show evidence of systematic racial bias in all datasets, as classifiers trained on them tend to predict that tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates,” reads the study’s abstract. “If these abusive language detection systems are used in the field they will, therefore, have a disproportionate negative impact on African-American social media users.”
One of the study’s authors said that “internal biases” may be to blame for why “we may see language written in what linguists consider African American English and be more likely to think that it’s something that is offensive.”
Automated technology for identifying hate speech is not new, nor are universities the only parties developing it. Two years ago, Google unveiled its own system called “Perspective,” designed to rate phrases and sentences based on how “toxic” they might be.
Shortly after the release of Perspective, YouTube user Tormental made a video of the program at work, alleging inconsistencies in implementation.
According to Tormental, the system rated prejudicial comments against minorities as more “toxic” than equivalent statements against white people.
Google’s system showed a similar discrepancy for bigoted comments directed at women versus men.
Story cited here.
