Researchers from the University of Cornell discovered that artificial intelligence systems designed to identify offensive “hate speech” flag comments purportedly made by minorities “at substantially higher rates” than remarks made by whites.
Several universities maintain artificial intelligence systems designed to monitor social media websites and report users who post “hate speech.” In a study published in May, researchers at Cornell discovered that systems “flag” tweets that likely come from black social media users more often, according to Campus Reform.
The study’s authors found that, according to the AI systems’ definition of abusive speech, “tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates.”
The study also revealed that “black-aligned tweets” are “sexist at almost twice the rate of white-aligned tweets.”
The research team averred that the unexpected findings could be explained by “systematic racial bias” displayed by the human beings who assisted in spotting offensive content.
Highly Respected, Long Tenured NFL Head Coach Fired After Team Failed to Make the Playoffs
‘Squad’ Rep Ayanna Pressley’s ex-con husband slaps phone out of man’s hands as he tries to ask her a question
By Mamdani Aide’s Own Logic, Her Mom Apparently Wields ‘Weapon of White Supremacy’
NYC sex offender indicted for threatening to kill Jews, police and federal officials
James Comer to accuse Tim Walz of being ‘asleep at the wheel’ at fraud hearing
Wisconsin judge convicted of obstructing ICE resigns, vows to keep fighting case
Wyoming Supreme Court rules laws restricting abortion violate state constitution
Trump admin expands visa bond requirement to 38 countries, with fees up to $15K
Video shows masked thieves using sledgehammer in brazen Lululemon heist before fleeing in U-Haul
Vance reposts sombrero meme mocking Democrats’ Jan 6 candlelight vigil
‘The People’s Qur’an’: Mamdani announces NYC Quran exhibit with book belonging to revolutionary activist
Biden, Who Donated Less Than 1 Percent of His Income to Charity at Times, Is Getting the Single Most ‘Extravagant’ Presidential Pension in History
Pardoned Jan. 6 participants demand ‘retribution’ in first commemorative march on Capitol
Jasmine Crockett Has Vulgar Response to SCOTUS After She Lost District in Texas
Trump announces Venezuela turning over millions of barrels of oil to US government ‘immediately’
“The results show evidence of systematic racial bias in all datasets, as classifiers trained on them tend to predict that tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates,” reads the study’s abstract. “If these abusive language detection systems are used in the field they will, therefore, have a disproportionate negative impact on African-American social media users.”
One of the study’s authors said that “internal biases” may be to blame for why “we may see language written in what linguists consider African American English and be more likely to think that it’s something that is offensive.”
Automated technology for identifying hate speech is not new, nor are universities the only parties developing it. Two years ago, Google unveiled its own system called “Perspective,” designed to rate phrases and sentences based on how “toxic” they might be.
Shortly after the release of Perspective, YouTube user Tormental made a video of the program at work, alleging inconsistencies in implementation.
According to Tormental, the system rated prejudicial comments against minorities as more “toxic” than equivalent statements against white people.
Google’s system showed a similar discrepancy for bigoted comments directed at women versus men.
Story cited here.
