Researchers from the University of Cornell discovered that artificial intelligence systems designed to identify offensive “hate speech” flag comments purportedly made by minorities “at substantially higher rates” than remarks made by whites.
Several universities maintain artificial intelligence systems designed to monitor social media websites and report users who post “hate speech.” In a study published in May, researchers at Cornell discovered that systems “flag” tweets that likely come from black social media users more often, according to Campus Reform.
The study’s authors found that, according to the AI systems’ definition of abusive speech, “tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates.”
The study also revealed that “black-aligned tweets” are “sexist at almost twice the rate of white-aligned tweets.”
The research team averred that the unexpected findings could be explained by “systematic racial bias” displayed by the human beings who assisted in spotting offensive content.
Israel accuses Mamdani of pouring ‘antisemitic gasoline’ after he revokes Adams executive orders
Coast Guard suspends search for 77-year-old woman who went overboard on Holland America Line cruise ship
Watch: Mamdani’s Opening Salvo as Mayor Slams American ‘Individualism,’ Praises ‘Collectivism’
Trump claims White House doctors report him in ‘perfect health,’ says he ‘aced’ third straight cognitive exam
Will Smith Sued Over Shocking ‘Grooming’ Allegations
Texas Appeals Court Overturns Conviction of Police Officer Who Shot Armed Man
Iranian officials threaten US troops after Trump promises intervention on behalf of protesters
Incoming Dem Virginia Governor Appoints DEI Director Who Cheered on Destroying the Constitution
Political violence has ‘just started,’ former FBI agent warns in 2026 outlook
Minnesota fraud scandal intensifies debate over stripping citizenship
The economic policies shaping Trump’s return to the White House
Where people got their entertainment in 2025
Europe struggles to keep pace as US cracks the whip on defensive self-reliance
It’s the prices, stupid: The big challenge that lies ahead for Trump and the GOP
Here are the key 2026 House and Senate races to watch that could decide control of Congress
“The results show evidence of systematic racial bias in all datasets, as classifiers trained on them tend to predict that tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates,” reads the study’s abstract. “If these abusive language detection systems are used in the field they will, therefore, have a disproportionate negative impact on African-American social media users.”
One of the study’s authors said that “internal biases” may be to blame for why “we may see language written in what linguists consider African American English and be more likely to think that it’s something that is offensive.”
Automated technology for identifying hate speech is not new, nor are universities the only parties developing it. Two years ago, Google unveiled its own system called “Perspective,” designed to rate phrases and sentences based on how “toxic” they might be.
Shortly after the release of Perspective, YouTube user Tormental made a video of the program at work, alleging inconsistencies in implementation.
According to Tormental, the system rated prejudicial comments against minorities as more “toxic” than equivalent statements against white people.
Google’s system showed a similar discrepancy for bigoted comments directed at women versus men.
Story cited here.
