Researchers from the University of Cornell discovered that artificial intelligence systems designed to identify offensive “hate speech” flag comments purportedly made by minorities “at substantially higher rates” than remarks made by whites.
Several universities maintain artificial intelligence systems designed to monitor social media websites and report users who post “hate speech.” In a study published in May, researchers at Cornell discovered that systems “flag” tweets that likely come from black social media users more often, according to Campus Reform.
The study’s authors found that, according to the AI systems’ definition of abusive speech, “tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates.”
The study also revealed that “black-aligned tweets” are “sexist at almost twice the rate of white-aligned tweets.”
The research team averred that the unexpected findings could be explained by “systematic racial bias” displayed by the human beings who assisted in spotting offensive content.
Repeat offender allegedly kills Ohio man just days after nonprofit pays his bail
Oregon Cattle Rancher Accuses Amazon Data Center of Poisoning Local Water Supply
Walz under fire as Minnesota mayors sound alarm on ‘financial disaster’ ahead and more top headlines
Texas Man Fatally Shoots Two People Who Allegedly Followed and Attacked Him
Trump administration installing 900-mile wall of buoys in Rio Grande
Trump admin conducts another deadly attack on ‘low-profile vessel’ perpetrating ‘narco-trafficking operations’
Media personalities who lost their jobs over news bias in 2025
White House says no to Catholic bishops’ call for Christmas pause in immigration enforcement
FCC announces ban on new Chinese-made drones over national security concerns
20% of NYC mayor-elect Mamdani transition appointees have anti-Zionist ties: ADL
ICE arrests 100+ illegal alien truckers in major sweep after deadly crashes across multiple states
Democrat lawmakers call on Trump to withdraw rule limiting green cards for people on welfare
Epstein File Photos Give ‘Powerful Reminder’ of Bill Clinton’s Scandalous Past
Angel Studios ‘DAVID’ opens to studio’s best box office weekend
Pentagon taps Musk’s xAI to boost sensitive government workflows, support military operations
“The results show evidence of systematic racial bias in all datasets, as classifiers trained on them tend to predict that tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates,” reads the study’s abstract. “If these abusive language detection systems are used in the field they will, therefore, have a disproportionate negative impact on African-American social media users.”
One of the study’s authors said that “internal biases” may be to blame for why “we may see language written in what linguists consider African American English and be more likely to think that it’s something that is offensive.”
Automated technology for identifying hate speech is not new, nor are universities the only parties developing it. Two years ago, Google unveiled its own system called “Perspective,” designed to rate phrases and sentences based on how “toxic” they might be.
Shortly after the release of Perspective, YouTube user Tormental made a video of the program at work, alleging inconsistencies in implementation.
According to Tormental, the system rated prejudicial comments against minorities as more “toxic” than equivalent statements against white people.
Google’s system showed a similar discrepancy for bigoted comments directed at women versus men.
Story cited here.
