Clinton Foundation Failed to Disclose 1,100 Foreign Donations

Let’s see if we can contextualize this for you: You already know that the Clinton Foundation failed to report tens of millions in foreign donations in their tax documents, a revelation that has forced the organization to re-file at least five years’ worth of returns. You also already knew that some of those many undisclosed donations (which violated Hillary’s transparency pledge) were related to a troubling transaction in which (a) the Russian government obtained the rights to a large chunk of US uranium interests, (b) investors and magnates connected to the deal profited handsomely, (c) the Clinton Foundation (and the Clinton themselves) pocketed millions, and (d) Hillary’s State Department signed off on the whole thing — before “repeatedly breaking” promises to mitigate national security concerns. Bloomberg and Fox News are reporting that a Clinton Foundation-tied group led by a man at the center of the uranium deal didn’t disclose more than 1,000 foreign donors:

There are in fact 1,100 undisclosed donors to the Clinton Foundation, Giustra says, most of them non-U.S. residents who donated to CGEP…The reason this is a politically explosive revelation is because the Clinton Foundation promised to disclose its donors as a condition of Hillary Clinton becoming secretary of state. Shortly after Barack Obama was elected president in 2008, the Clinton Foundation signed a “memorandum of understanding” with the Obama White House agreeing to reveal its contributors every year. The agreement stipulates that the “Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative” (as the charity was then known) is part of the Clinton Foundation and must follow “the same protocols.” It hasn’t. Giustra says that’s because Canada’s federal privacy law forbids CGEP, a Canadian-registered charity, from revealing its donors.

Breaking: Musk’s SpaceX Catches Its Own Starship Falling Back to Earth in Historic First

Officials Shocked as Tanker-Cruiser Crash Ends in ‘Literal Miracle on the Mississippi’ with No Fatalities

Dem Hecklers Scream ‘Traitor’ at Hakeem Jeffries for Not Impeaching Trump Fast Enough as He Gears Up to Become House Speaker

Johnny Depp Defeats Cancel Culture as ‘Ebenezer’ Storms to Number 1 in Triumphant Box Office Return

FN4220H8 title

FN4220H7 title

At least 100 people pulled from Mississippi River after New Orleans ship crash as lengthy salvage effort looms

Investors push for Jensen Huang to be reinstated as Nvidia CEO after affair with suspected spy

Minneapolis ‘Clan Violence’ Targets Scholar Who Exposed Ilhan Omar’s Father as Colonel in Bloody Regime, Forces Him to Cancel Visit: Report

Mamdani Vowed for Accountability in Catastrophic Building Collapse That Killed 8 – New Report Points the Finger at His Own Admin

Justice Alito warns America must preserve 3 core principles regardless of country’s ‘atmosphere’

White House lawyer’s hardball warning to Dems has legal experts on both sides questioning one key threat

Dems seize on midterm rout to demand ICE reform but polls reveal a twist in who prioritized immigration

Democrats eye killing Senate filibuster as lawmaker warns move could be a ‘double-edged sword’

Dems descend on Denver to size up 2028. We asked who wants in the race

As we noted yesterday, a review by The Federalist exposed the ‘Canadian law’ excuse as inaccurate, an assessment confirmed by the Washington Post’s fact-checker, which awarded Clinton, Inc. “three Pinocchios” for the claim. A Sunlight Foundation official has referred to the Clintons’ network as a “slush fund,” and a former Clinton Foundation official told a reporter in 2007 that the organization is “not charity — it’s all bankable.” Sean Davis wonders, not without reason, if the whole thing amounts to an “international money laundering scheme:”

The Clinton Foundation’s deliberate misinterpretation of Canadian privacy law in order to rationalize its secrecy raises several questions, chief among them: why? Why go to all this effort to hide years’ worth of million-dollar donations from foreign citizens and foreign governments? Donations which were almost certainly being made while Hillary Clinton was serving as Secretary of State, and almost certainly with the intent to influence her decisions? The answer is an easy one, albeit one that is highly uncomfortable: for the past several years, the Clinton Foundation has basically been a foreign money-laundering operation. The scheme works like this: collect millions of dollars in foreign money, dump it into a foreign charity, pretend that the law prohibits you from ever disclosing the identities of those foreign donors to the foreign charity, then have the foreign charity bundle all the cash and send it to the Clinton Foundation. Then, when the time comes–whether it be a Clinton Foundation conference or a lavish Clinton Foundation trip overseas–make sure those individuals get some me-time with the Clintons.