The free speech rights of two Christian artists who make wedding invitations were violated by an anti-discrimination ordinance in Phoenix that makes it illegal to refuse service to same-sex couples for religious reasons, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled Monday.
The 4-3 decision reversed lower-court rulings favoring the city.
The state Supreme Court said its ruling is limited to only the creation of custom wedding invitations by Joanna Duka and Breanna Koski and isn’t a blanket exemption from the ordinance for all their business operations.
The artists, who believe a marriage should be between only a man and woman, had argued that the ordinance would violate their religious beliefs by forcing them to custom-make products for same-sex marriage ceremonies.
The high court said the city can’t force them to make same-sex wedding invitations.
Ellison brags to DNC activists how many times he has sued the Trump admin: ‘You can count on me’
Klobuchar launches Minnesota governor bid after Walz ends re-election run amid massive fraud scandal
Illinois teen stabs pregnant woman 70 times, knifes dog, sets home ablaze during Facebook Marketplace meetup
Trump admin finds California ban on notifying parents of gender transitions violated federal law
Texas killer asks victims’ families for forgiveness before becoming first execution of 2026
Georgia assistant principal accused of stealing nearly $1K in Walmart merchandise at self-checkout
NJ councilwoman condemns ‘ignorance’ of comparing ICE agents to Nazis during heated meeting
Trump taps Colin McDonald for newly-created role of assistant attorney general for fraud enforcement
Ilhan Omar demands impeachment of Noem amid DHS funding battle: ‘We must abolish ICE’
Video appears to show Alex Pretti spit at federal agents, violently damage SUV days before fatal CBP shooting
Ilhan Omar blames Trump’s rhetoric for surge in death threats, including spray attack: ‘So obsessed with me’
Rubio Defends Maduro Raid in Fiery Exchange with Rand Paul: ‘We Did Not Remove an Elected Official’
Breaking: New Video Reportedly Shows Alex Pretti Violently Attacking, Destroying Equipment on ICE Vehicle Days Before Shooting
Delusional Rocker Neil Young Gifts Music Catalog to Greenland, Claims It Will Help Them Cope With Trump
‘This Is Not a Game Show’: Marco Rubio Refuses to Go Along with Dem Senator’s Hearing Tactics
“Duka and Koski’s beliefs about same-sex marriage may seem old-fashioned, or even offensive to some,” the court majority wrote. “But the guarantees of free speech and freedom of religion are not only for those who are deemed sufficiently enlightened, advanced, or progressive. They are for everyone.”
In the dissenting opinion, the court’s minority said the case doesn’t concern the content of custom wedding products but instead pertains to the identity of customers.
“Today’s decision is also deeply troubling because its reasoning cannot be limited to discrimination related to same-sex marriage or based on the beliefs of any one religion, but instead extends more broadly to other claims of a ‘right’ by businesses to deny services to disfavored customers,” the opinion states.
The majority ruling said the city and dissenting justices claimed that if the court were to dare to let the artists express their beliefs, “we, in essence, run the risk of resurrecting the Jim Crow laws of the Old South.”
Lawyers for the city are examining potential grounds for an appeal.
Ellison brags to DNC activists how many times he has sued the Trump admin: ‘You can count on me’
Klobuchar launches Minnesota governor bid after Walz ends re-election run amid massive fraud scandal
Illinois teen stabs pregnant woman 70 times, knifes dog, sets home ablaze during Facebook Marketplace meetup
Trump admin finds California ban on notifying parents of gender transitions violated federal law
Texas killer asks victims’ families for forgiveness before becoming first execution of 2026
Georgia assistant principal accused of stealing nearly $1K in Walmart merchandise at self-checkout
NJ councilwoman condemns ‘ignorance’ of comparing ICE agents to Nazis during heated meeting
Trump taps Colin McDonald for newly-created role of assistant attorney general for fraud enforcement
Ilhan Omar demands impeachment of Noem amid DHS funding battle: ‘We must abolish ICE’
Video appears to show Alex Pretti spit at federal agents, violently damage SUV days before fatal CBP shooting
Ilhan Omar blames Trump’s rhetoric for surge in death threats, including spray attack: ‘So obsessed with me’
Rubio Defends Maduro Raid in Fiery Exchange with Rand Paul: ‘We Did Not Remove an Elected Official’
Breaking: New Video Reportedly Shows Alex Pretti Violently Attacking, Destroying Equipment on ICE Vehicle Days Before Shooting
Delusional Rocker Neil Young Gifts Music Catalog to Greenland, Claims It Will Help Them Cope With Trump
‘This Is Not a Game Show’: Marco Rubio Refuses to Go Along with Dem Senator’s Hearing Tactics
Mayor Kate Gallego, a Democrat, emphasized that the ordinance remains in effect.
“I want to be clear: The city of Phoenix does not and will not tolerate hate in any form,” Gallego said. “That doesn’t change with today’s ruling and we will not stop with our fight.”
In 2018, the US Supreme Court sided with a Colorado baker who refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple, finding that state’s civil rights commission showed anti-religious bias when it ruled against the baker for refusing to make the cake.
The Supreme Court decision, however, didn’t address the larger issue of whether a business can invoke religious objections to refuse service to gay and lesbian people.
An Arizona state law that bars discrimination by businesses doesn’t include sexual orientation as a protected class. Phoenix, Tempe, Flagstaff and Tucson have passed ordinances banning businesses from discriminating on that basis.
So far, Phoenix hasn’t taken any enforcement actions stemming from the ban.
Ellison brags to DNC activists how many times he has sued the Trump admin: ‘You can count on me’
Klobuchar launches Minnesota governor bid after Walz ends re-election run amid massive fraud scandal
Illinois teen stabs pregnant woman 70 times, knifes dog, sets home ablaze during Facebook Marketplace meetup
Trump admin finds California ban on notifying parents of gender transitions violated federal law
Texas killer asks victims’ families for forgiveness before becoming first execution of 2026
Georgia assistant principal accused of stealing nearly $1K in Walmart merchandise at self-checkout
NJ councilwoman condemns ‘ignorance’ of comparing ICE agents to Nazis during heated meeting
Trump taps Colin McDonald for newly-created role of assistant attorney general for fraud enforcement
Ilhan Omar demands impeachment of Noem amid DHS funding battle: ‘We must abolish ICE’
Video appears to show Alex Pretti spit at federal agents, violently damage SUV days before fatal CBP shooting
Ilhan Omar blames Trump’s rhetoric for surge in death threats, including spray attack: ‘So obsessed with me’
Rubio Defends Maduro Raid in Fiery Exchange with Rand Paul: ‘We Did Not Remove an Elected Official’
Breaking: New Video Reportedly Shows Alex Pretti Violently Attacking, Destroying Equipment on ICE Vehicle Days Before Shooting
Delusional Rocker Neil Young Gifts Music Catalog to Greenland, Claims It Will Help Them Cope With Trump
‘This Is Not a Game Show’: Marco Rubio Refuses to Go Along with Dem Senator’s Hearing Tactics
A lawyer representing the Arizona artists portrayed the state high court ruling as a sweeping victory, even though the justices limited their ruling to custom wedding invitations.
“Regardless of one’s view on marriage, this is a win for all citizens of Arizona, because a government that can crush Joanna and Breanna can crush any one of us,” said Jonathan Scruggs, an attorney for Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative advocacy organization that brought the case.
Scruggs acknowledged the ruling doesn’t automatically protect other business owners, who would need to seek their own court order to avoid running afoul of the nondiscrimination ordinances in Phoenix or other Arizona cities.
Jenny Pizer, law and policy director for the LGBT rights group Lambda Legal, which filed a friend-of-the-court brief supporting the city’s position, said the ruling was troubling.
“The court misguidedly has concluded that free speech protections allow businesses to express anti-gay religious views by denying particular custom-design services to customers because of who they are,” Pizer said.
Story cited here.
