The free speech rights of two Christian artists who make wedding invitations were violated by an anti-discrimination ordinance in Phoenix that makes it illegal to refuse service to same-sex couples for religious reasons, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled Monday.
The 4-3 decision reversed lower-court rulings favoring the city.
The state Supreme Court said its ruling is limited to only the creation of custom wedding invitations by Joanna Duka and Breanna Koski and isn’t a blanket exemption from the ordinance for all their business operations.
The artists, who believe a marriage should be between only a man and woman, had argued that the ordinance would violate their religious beliefs by forcing them to custom-make products for same-sex marriage ceremonies.
The high court said the city can’t force them to make same-sex wedding invitations.
Trump ally diGenova tapped to lead DOJ probe into Brennan over Russia probe origins
Texas AG Paxton Launches Probe Into Lululemon for Allegedly Exposing Customers to Harmful Chemicals in Clothing
This Airline Celebrated as an Unruly Passenger Was Put Behind Bars
Cold case breakthrough solves teen killing after suspect lived free for decades: ‘Better be afraid’
Hundreds of activists face pepper spray in violent clash with deputies at Wisconsin beagle research facility
Trump renews bridge, power plant threat against Iran in push for deal, mocks ‘tough guy’ IRGC
Voters Attack Back in Missouri: Council Members in Multiple Towns Electorally Whacked as Fed-Up Voters Send Blunt Message
Vance says he’s ‘grateful’ for Pope Leo’s statement on not wanting public debate with Trump
Trump’s Quick Reply to Joe Rogan’s Text Message Brought Him to the White House: ‘Do You Want FDA Approval?’
Transportation industry showers son-in-law of transportation secretary with cash to fuel congressional bid
Virginia could lose influence in Congress if Spanberger’s gerrymander passes
Illegal immigrant accused of attempted rape in Virginia had past charges dropped by Soros-backed prosecutor
Obama, Mamdani sing ‘Wheels on the Bus’ with Bronx kids during first joint appearance: video
NYC teen shot dead on Queens basketball court as bystanders filmed; police searching for gunman
Rubio targets Nicaraguan official over alleged torture tied to ‘brutal’ Ortega regime
“Duka and Koski’s beliefs about same-sex marriage may seem old-fashioned, or even offensive to some,” the court majority wrote. “But the guarantees of free speech and freedom of religion are not only for those who are deemed sufficiently enlightened, advanced, or progressive. They are for everyone.”
In the dissenting opinion, the court’s minority said the case doesn’t concern the content of custom wedding products but instead pertains to the identity of customers.
“Today’s decision is also deeply troubling because its reasoning cannot be limited to discrimination related to same-sex marriage or based on the beliefs of any one religion, but instead extends more broadly to other claims of a ‘right’ by businesses to deny services to disfavored customers,” the opinion states.
The majority ruling said the city and dissenting justices claimed that if the court were to dare to let the artists express their beliefs, “we, in essence, run the risk of resurrecting the Jim Crow laws of the Old South.”
Lawyers for the city are examining potential grounds for an appeal.
Trump ally diGenova tapped to lead DOJ probe into Brennan over Russia probe origins
Texas AG Paxton Launches Probe Into Lululemon for Allegedly Exposing Customers to Harmful Chemicals in Clothing
This Airline Celebrated as an Unruly Passenger Was Put Behind Bars
Cold case breakthrough solves teen killing after suspect lived free for decades: ‘Better be afraid’
Hundreds of activists face pepper spray in violent clash with deputies at Wisconsin beagle research facility
Trump renews bridge, power plant threat against Iran in push for deal, mocks ‘tough guy’ IRGC
Voters Attack Back in Missouri: Council Members in Multiple Towns Electorally Whacked as Fed-Up Voters Send Blunt Message
Vance says he’s ‘grateful’ for Pope Leo’s statement on not wanting public debate with Trump
Trump’s Quick Reply to Joe Rogan’s Text Message Brought Him to the White House: ‘Do You Want FDA Approval?’
Transportation industry showers son-in-law of transportation secretary with cash to fuel congressional bid
Virginia could lose influence in Congress if Spanberger’s gerrymander passes
Illegal immigrant accused of attempted rape in Virginia had past charges dropped by Soros-backed prosecutor
Obama, Mamdani sing ‘Wheels on the Bus’ with Bronx kids during first joint appearance: video
NYC teen shot dead on Queens basketball court as bystanders filmed; police searching for gunman
Rubio targets Nicaraguan official over alleged torture tied to ‘brutal’ Ortega regime
Mayor Kate Gallego, a Democrat, emphasized that the ordinance remains in effect.
“I want to be clear: The city of Phoenix does not and will not tolerate hate in any form,” Gallego said. “That doesn’t change with today’s ruling and we will not stop with our fight.”
In 2018, the US Supreme Court sided with a Colorado baker who refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple, finding that state’s civil rights commission showed anti-religious bias when it ruled against the baker for refusing to make the cake.
The Supreme Court decision, however, didn’t address the larger issue of whether a business can invoke religious objections to refuse service to gay and lesbian people.
An Arizona state law that bars discrimination by businesses doesn’t include sexual orientation as a protected class. Phoenix, Tempe, Flagstaff and Tucson have passed ordinances banning businesses from discriminating on that basis.
So far, Phoenix hasn’t taken any enforcement actions stemming from the ban.
Trump ally diGenova tapped to lead DOJ probe into Brennan over Russia probe origins
Texas AG Paxton Launches Probe Into Lululemon for Allegedly Exposing Customers to Harmful Chemicals in Clothing
This Airline Celebrated as an Unruly Passenger Was Put Behind Bars
Cold case breakthrough solves teen killing after suspect lived free for decades: ‘Better be afraid’
Hundreds of activists face pepper spray in violent clash with deputies at Wisconsin beagle research facility
Trump renews bridge, power plant threat against Iran in push for deal, mocks ‘tough guy’ IRGC
Voters Attack Back in Missouri: Council Members in Multiple Towns Electorally Whacked as Fed-Up Voters Send Blunt Message
Vance says he’s ‘grateful’ for Pope Leo’s statement on not wanting public debate with Trump
Trump’s Quick Reply to Joe Rogan’s Text Message Brought Him to the White House: ‘Do You Want FDA Approval?’
Transportation industry showers son-in-law of transportation secretary with cash to fuel congressional bid
Virginia could lose influence in Congress if Spanberger’s gerrymander passes
Illegal immigrant accused of attempted rape in Virginia had past charges dropped by Soros-backed prosecutor
Obama, Mamdani sing ‘Wheels on the Bus’ with Bronx kids during first joint appearance: video
NYC teen shot dead on Queens basketball court as bystanders filmed; police searching for gunman
Rubio targets Nicaraguan official over alleged torture tied to ‘brutal’ Ortega regime
A lawyer representing the Arizona artists portrayed the state high court ruling as a sweeping victory, even though the justices limited their ruling to custom wedding invitations.
“Regardless of one’s view on marriage, this is a win for all citizens of Arizona, because a government that can crush Joanna and Breanna can crush any one of us,” said Jonathan Scruggs, an attorney for Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative advocacy organization that brought the case.
Scruggs acknowledged the ruling doesn’t automatically protect other business owners, who would need to seek their own court order to avoid running afoul of the nondiscrimination ordinances in Phoenix or other Arizona cities.
Jenny Pizer, law and policy director for the LGBT rights group Lambda Legal, which filed a friend-of-the-court brief supporting the city’s position, said the ruling was troubling.
“The court misguidedly has concluded that free speech protections allow businesses to express anti-gay religious views by denying particular custom-design services to customers because of who they are,” Pizer said.
Story cited here.
