The free speech rights of two Christian artists who make wedding invitations were violated by an anti-discrimination ordinance in Phoenix that makes it illegal to refuse service to same-sex couples for religious reasons, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled Monday.
The 4-3 decision reversed lower-court rulings favoring the city.
The state Supreme Court said its ruling is limited to only the creation of custom wedding invitations by Joanna Duka and Breanna Koski and isn’t a blanket exemption from the ordinance for all their business operations.
The artists, who believe a marriage should be between only a man and woman, had argued that the ordinance would violate their religious beliefs by forcing them to custom-make products for same-sex marriage ceremonies.
The high court said the city can’t force them to make same-sex wedding invitations.
Personal attacks, Israel, and terrorism define Michigan’s caustic Senate debate
ABC News Targets Trump Family, But Has to Immediately Delete False Story – Was Off by Billions of Dollars
California Medical Breakthroughs Bring In Hundreds of Millions While the Very Same Industry Suffers Substantial Job Loss
Federal grand jury hears evidence in probe of former Trump aide Cassidy Hutchinson’s Jan 6 testimony: source
Michigan Senate debate erupts into personal attacks as Rogers, El-Sayed clash over Israel, Iran and more
El Sayed dodges question on whether Israel or Iran poses greater threat to US: ‘Both of them have proven dangerous in their own way’
Letitia James Hit with 52-Count ‘Indictment’ from Her Republican Opponent
Fauci raved about China but fumed at Trump in diary
Arizona man arrested after allegedly emailing White House bomb threat to Tucson news station
Bombshell: New Text from Cornell Rape Accuser Contains 4 Case-Killing Words – ‘Our Body Our Choice’ – Media Omits Them All
Logan Federico’s dad says criminals have become ‘more important’ than victims, pushes repeat offender registry
Pentagon confirms Fort Hood terrorist’s firing squad execution will be livestreamed: ‘Details will follow’
Dem who ripped rival’s donor-fueled ‘good life’ dropped campaign cash on Disney, spouse travel
NFL Legend Tony Dungy Says His Christian Faith Played a Role in His Firing from NBC: ‘They Knew Who I Was’
Roseanne Barr Roars Back from Cancellation by Secretly Filming Star-Studded Sitcom
“Duka and Koski’s beliefs about same-sex marriage may seem old-fashioned, or even offensive to some,” the court majority wrote. “But the guarantees of free speech and freedom of religion are not only for those who are deemed sufficiently enlightened, advanced, or progressive. They are for everyone.”
In the dissenting opinion, the court’s minority said the case doesn’t concern the content of custom wedding products but instead pertains to the identity of customers.
“Today’s decision is also deeply troubling because its reasoning cannot be limited to discrimination related to same-sex marriage or based on the beliefs of any one religion, but instead extends more broadly to other claims of a ‘right’ by businesses to deny services to disfavored customers,” the opinion states.
The majority ruling said the city and dissenting justices claimed that if the court were to dare to let the artists express their beliefs, “we, in essence, run the risk of resurrecting the Jim Crow laws of the Old South.”
Lawyers for the city are examining potential grounds for an appeal.
Personal attacks, Israel, and terrorism define Michigan’s caustic Senate debate
ABC News Targets Trump Family, But Has to Immediately Delete False Story – Was Off by Billions of Dollars
California Medical Breakthroughs Bring In Hundreds of Millions While the Very Same Industry Suffers Substantial Job Loss
Federal grand jury hears evidence in probe of former Trump aide Cassidy Hutchinson’s Jan 6 testimony: source
Michigan Senate debate erupts into personal attacks as Rogers, El-Sayed clash over Israel, Iran and more
El Sayed dodges question on whether Israel or Iran poses greater threat to US: ‘Both of them have proven dangerous in their own way’
Letitia James Hit with 52-Count ‘Indictment’ from Her Republican Opponent
Fauci raved about China but fumed at Trump in diary
Arizona man arrested after allegedly emailing White House bomb threat to Tucson news station
Bombshell: New Text from Cornell Rape Accuser Contains 4 Case-Killing Words – ‘Our Body Our Choice’ – Media Omits Them All
Logan Federico’s dad says criminals have become ‘more important’ than victims, pushes repeat offender registry
Pentagon confirms Fort Hood terrorist’s firing squad execution will be livestreamed: ‘Details will follow’
Dem who ripped rival’s donor-fueled ‘good life’ dropped campaign cash on Disney, spouse travel
NFL Legend Tony Dungy Says His Christian Faith Played a Role in His Firing from NBC: ‘They Knew Who I Was’
Roseanne Barr Roars Back from Cancellation by Secretly Filming Star-Studded Sitcom
Mayor Kate Gallego, a Democrat, emphasized that the ordinance remains in effect.
“I want to be clear: The city of Phoenix does not and will not tolerate hate in any form,” Gallego said. “That doesn’t change with today’s ruling and we will not stop with our fight.”
In 2018, the US Supreme Court sided with a Colorado baker who refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple, finding that state’s civil rights commission showed anti-religious bias when it ruled against the baker for refusing to make the cake.
The Supreme Court decision, however, didn’t address the larger issue of whether a business can invoke religious objections to refuse service to gay and lesbian people.
An Arizona state law that bars discrimination by businesses doesn’t include sexual orientation as a protected class. Phoenix, Tempe, Flagstaff and Tucson have passed ordinances banning businesses from discriminating on that basis.
So far, Phoenix hasn’t taken any enforcement actions stemming from the ban.
Personal attacks, Israel, and terrorism define Michigan’s caustic Senate debate
ABC News Targets Trump Family, But Has to Immediately Delete False Story – Was Off by Billions of Dollars
California Medical Breakthroughs Bring In Hundreds of Millions While the Very Same Industry Suffers Substantial Job Loss
Federal grand jury hears evidence in probe of former Trump aide Cassidy Hutchinson’s Jan 6 testimony: source
Michigan Senate debate erupts into personal attacks as Rogers, El-Sayed clash over Israel, Iran and more
El Sayed dodges question on whether Israel or Iran poses greater threat to US: ‘Both of them have proven dangerous in their own way’
Letitia James Hit with 52-Count ‘Indictment’ from Her Republican Opponent
Fauci raved about China but fumed at Trump in diary
Arizona man arrested after allegedly emailing White House bomb threat to Tucson news station
Bombshell: New Text from Cornell Rape Accuser Contains 4 Case-Killing Words – ‘Our Body Our Choice’ – Media Omits Them All
Logan Federico’s dad says criminals have become ‘more important’ than victims, pushes repeat offender registry
Pentagon confirms Fort Hood terrorist’s firing squad execution will be livestreamed: ‘Details will follow’
Dem who ripped rival’s donor-fueled ‘good life’ dropped campaign cash on Disney, spouse travel
NFL Legend Tony Dungy Says His Christian Faith Played a Role in His Firing from NBC: ‘They Knew Who I Was’
Roseanne Barr Roars Back from Cancellation by Secretly Filming Star-Studded Sitcom
A lawyer representing the Arizona artists portrayed the state high court ruling as a sweeping victory, even though the justices limited their ruling to custom wedding invitations.
“Regardless of one’s view on marriage, this is a win for all citizens of Arizona, because a government that can crush Joanna and Breanna can crush any one of us,” said Jonathan Scruggs, an attorney for Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative advocacy organization that brought the case.
Scruggs acknowledged the ruling doesn’t automatically protect other business owners, who would need to seek their own court order to avoid running afoul of the nondiscrimination ordinances in Phoenix or other Arizona cities.
Jenny Pizer, law and policy director for the LGBT rights group Lambda Legal, which filed a friend-of-the-court brief supporting the city’s position, said the ruling was troubling.
“The court misguidedly has concluded that free speech protections allow businesses to express anti-gay religious views by denying particular custom-design services to customers because of who they are,” Pizer said.
Story cited here.
