The California Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit brought by Catholic missionaries that sought to overturn a state mandate that forces them to pay insurance premiums that subsidize abortions.
The Missionary Guadalupanas of the Holy Spirit, an organization of Catholic women, were told in August by a state appeals court that a woman’s choice to have an abortion must be considered “medically necessary,” reported the San Francisco Chronicle.
In 2014, under Democrat Gov. Jerry Brown, California adopted regulations that state, under Obamacare, all voluntary abortions are “basic health care” and “medically necessary” and must be provided by all health insurance plans with no allowance for religious or moral objections.
The missionaries argued that only abortions to save the life of the mother are “medically necessary” and maintained the state unlawfully adopted the new regulations without an opportunity for public comment.
In April, it was discovered that, while the general public was not given an opportunity to comment, Planned Parenthood provided its input.
Internal emails between Planned Parenthood and the California Health and Human Services agency in February 2014 revealed the abortion chain pressured the state agency to force religious groups and churches to cover elective abortions.
Catholic News Agency reported that three churches filed a notice of appeal in federal court that used the emails revealing the discussions between Planned Parenthood and the state health agency as evidence.
In the emails, lobbyists for Planned Parenthood insisted that religious groups, churches, and, specifically, Catholic colleges, be forced to offer coverage for elective abortions.
Trump Disputes His Energy Secretary’s Assessment of Gas Prices: ‘He’s Wrong on That’
Nancy Mace Calls for ‘Immediate’ Expulsion of Fellow House Republican: ‘The Worst Kind of Pond Scum’
Repeat offender released early from jail now charged with capital murder of pregnant woman
Trump and Johnson to hold Virginia tele-rally against Spanberger’s gerrymander
Who is Joseph diGenova Reagan-era prosecutor tapped to lead ‘grand conspiracy’ investigation
Mob of teens chases college student into campus dorm, unleashes violent attack as police hunt suspects
Eight children dead in Louisiana domestic violence killing spree: What to know
Texas AG Paxton sues Dem fundraising platform ActBlue, alleging ‘fraudulent and foreign donations’
Bernie-backed Dem’s pro-gun Clint Eastwood post, Kaepernick critique spurs apology in battleground race
Watch Patel on Bartiromo: ‘I Can Announce’ Arrests Are Coming in Stolen 2020 Election Case – ‘Stay Tuned This Week’
Trump Reveals JD Vance and His Negotiating Team ‘Heading Over’ for Second Round of Iran Talks
WATCH: Houston faces $110M hit as Texas gov lays down law on ‘sanctuary’ policies
Left-wing activists heckle pro-Israel Democrat Haley Stevens at Michigan convention
Kash Patel files $250 million defamation lawsuit against the Atlantic over drinking allegations
Hawaii tourist charged with attempted murder, accused of stabbing veteran boat captain on snorkel tour
Anxious to ensure that no faith groups or Catholic colleges could claim an exemption to the regulation, Planned Parenthood lobbyists demanded a regulatory fix but would also have a draft of a piece of legislation at the ready if the fix could not be made.
Beth Parker, chief legal counsel for Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, wrote to Shelley Rouillard at the state’s Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC):
While we would prefer to see this resolved without legislation, we are concerned with DMHC’s ability to find a solution based on several months of conversation and the inconsistencies in DMHC policy on abortion coverage we uncovered in health plan approval documents … We really want to find a comprehensive resolution to this issue, whether legislative or administrative.
Planned Parenthood lobbyist Brianna Pittman then proposed the deal:
[O]ur folks would feel positive about pursing [sic] an administrative solution, in lieu of legislation this year, if the Administration would agree to:
– Going forward, DMHC will not approve any further plans that exclude coverage for abortion or other reproductive health care service. This includes a clarification that there is no such thing as an elective or voluntary abortion exclusion. Simply saying that plans need to cover “medically necessary” abortions has been the source of the issue and does not solve the problem.
“DMHC will rescind their approval” of insurance plans that exclude elective abortion coverage, Pittman continued with Planned Parenthood’s demands.
Trump Disputes His Energy Secretary’s Assessment of Gas Prices: ‘He’s Wrong on That’
Nancy Mace Calls for ‘Immediate’ Expulsion of Fellow House Republican: ‘The Worst Kind of Pond Scum’
Repeat offender released early from jail now charged with capital murder of pregnant woman
Trump and Johnson to hold Virginia tele-rally against Spanberger’s gerrymander
Who is Joseph diGenova Reagan-era prosecutor tapped to lead ‘grand conspiracy’ investigation
Mob of teens chases college student into campus dorm, unleashes violent attack as police hunt suspects
Eight children dead in Louisiana domestic violence killing spree: What to know
Texas AG Paxton sues Dem fundraising platform ActBlue, alleging ‘fraudulent and foreign donations’
Bernie-backed Dem’s pro-gun Clint Eastwood post, Kaepernick critique spurs apology in battleground race
Watch Patel on Bartiromo: ‘I Can Announce’ Arrests Are Coming in Stolen 2020 Election Case – ‘Stay Tuned This Week’
Trump Reveals JD Vance and His Negotiating Team ‘Heading Over’ for Second Round of Iran Talks
WATCH: Houston faces $110M hit as Texas gov lays down law on ‘sanctuary’ policies
Left-wing activists heckle pro-Israel Democrat Haley Stevens at Michigan convention
Kash Patel files $250 million defamation lawsuit against the Atlantic over drinking allegations
Hawaii tourist charged with attempted murder, accused of stabbing veteran boat captain on snorkel tour
Subsequently, in August 2014, DMHC declared that, under Obamacare, abortion was now “basic health care.” As a result of this redefinition, all insurance plans in the state — even those of churches and other religious organizations — were now required to provide coverage for elective abortions.
In 2016, the Obama HHS Office of Civil Rights upheld the California mandate that required churches in California to pay for elective abortions. Three churches — Foothill Church in Glendora, Calvary Chapel Chino Hills in Chino, and The Shepherd of the Hills Church in Porter Ranch — had filed a lawsuit against the rule, arguing their conscience rights were protected under the Weldon Amendment.
The administration claimed it found no violation of the Weldon Amendment and was, therefore, terminating its investigation without further action.
“The government shouldn’t be forcing churches to pay for abortion, and it is shameful and inappropriate that the government did so in this case at the bidding of Planned Parenthood,” said Jeremiah Galus, legal counsel for Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), which represented the churches. “California officials are required to follow the law and legal precedent, not the dictates of groups that have an axe to grind against religious organizations that don’t share their views on abortion.”
Story cited here.
