The state of California has made no secret that it wants to let as many people out of prison as possible.
From the early release of inmates through AB 109, to filling parole boards with felon friendly commissioners, to decriminalizing a litany of felonies and drug offenses with Props 47 and 57, Sacramento lawmakers are bending over backwards to dramatically reduce the state’s inmate population.
Despite all of these efforts, the number of inmates hasn’t dropped dramatically enough to satisfy the state’s ruling Democrats, so they’re kicking tires on a new approach — rigging the jury system so no one gets convicted in the first place.
This most recent push is Senate Bill 310, authored by state Sen. Nancy Skinner, D-Berkeley, and would allow Californians who have prior felony convictions to serve on juries.
House Democrats demand Kash Patel take alcohol test under penalty of perjury after Atlantic report
Minnesota allows ‘happy hour’ in nursing homes under new law easing alcohol restrictions
ICE detains illegal immigrant accused of sexually assaulting minor after hospital parking lot birth
US military launches first-ever autonomous warfare command to deploy unmanned systems across Latin America
Top California Dem running for office tied to Chinese school accused of US diploma scandal
Appeals court rules ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ can stay open, rejecting push for federal environmental impact review
EXCLUSIVE: DHS honors angel families during National Crime Victims Week, calls crimes ‘completely preventable’
Democrats win Virginia redistricting fight, threatening Republican House majority
‘Melrose Place’ and ‘Starship Troopers’ Actor Patrick Muldoon Dies at Age 57
Top House Republican Warns Ilhan Omar That Her Financial Disclosure Revision Won’t Save Her
EXCLUSIVE: Pence warns GOP ‘must deliver,’ or Planned Parenthood gets taxpayer cash on Fourth of July deadline
House Republican Campaign Committee Blows Democrats Away with Historic Fundraising Quarter
Pro-Iran Jimmy Kimmel Mocks Peace Talks, Says He’s ‘More Likely to Believe the Ayatollah’ Than Trump
Democrat Trying to Flip Pennsylvania Seat Apologizes for Pro-Police, Pro-Gun, Pro-God Posts
Trump Recounts Helping Out ‘Incomparable’ Tim Cook as Longtime Apple CEO Steps Down
In a press release promoting the proposal, Skinner wrote, “SB310 will help ensure that California juries represent a fair cross-section of our communities…People with felony records have the right to vote in California. There is no legitimate reason why they should be barred from serving on a jury.”
Currently, felons are prevented from serving on juries because of their obvious and inherent bias against prosecutors and law enforcement.
If you honestly believe that jurors in California who’ve served time won’t be more lenient towards accused criminals, I’ve got a bullet train to sell you.
People who have a family member in law enforcement are excused from jury duty all the time because of the possibility of bias, even unconscious bias.
How can someone who’s served time be considered free of bias?
That’s like having crazy cat ladies vote on how many cats a person should own.
House Democrats demand Kash Patel take alcohol test under penalty of perjury after Atlantic report
Minnesota allows ‘happy hour’ in nursing homes under new law easing alcohol restrictions
ICE detains illegal immigrant accused of sexually assaulting minor after hospital parking lot birth
US military launches first-ever autonomous warfare command to deploy unmanned systems across Latin America
Top California Dem running for office tied to Chinese school accused of US diploma scandal
Appeals court rules ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ can stay open, rejecting push for federal environmental impact review
EXCLUSIVE: DHS honors angel families during National Crime Victims Week, calls crimes ‘completely preventable’
Democrats win Virginia redistricting fight, threatening Republican House majority
‘Melrose Place’ and ‘Starship Troopers’ Actor Patrick Muldoon Dies at Age 57
Top House Republican Warns Ilhan Omar That Her Financial Disclosure Revision Won’t Save Her
EXCLUSIVE: Pence warns GOP ‘must deliver,’ or Planned Parenthood gets taxpayer cash on Fourth of July deadline
House Republican Campaign Committee Blows Democrats Away with Historic Fundraising Quarter
Pro-Iran Jimmy Kimmel Mocks Peace Talks, Says He’s ‘More Likely to Believe the Ayatollah’ Than Trump
Democrat Trying to Flip Pennsylvania Seat Apologizes for Pro-Police, Pro-Gun, Pro-God Posts
Trump Recounts Helping Out ‘Incomparable’ Tim Cook as Longtime Apple CEO Steps Down
It should be noted that SB310 makes no distinction between violent and non-violent offenders, and even allows convicted felons who are still on probation or parole to serve.
Imagine serving your time, getting out of the clink, then getting sentenced to six months of jury duty on an insurance fraud case. Haven’t you paid your debt to society already?
Since this is California, and the idea is cartoonishly preposterous, of course it sailed through the Senate Public Safety Committee on a 5-1 vote.
In testimony to the Committee, Brendon Woods, Alameda County’s Public Defender, noted that defendants of color are often faced with juries in California in which “no one who sits in judgment looks like [them].”
In California it’s already illegal to exclude potential jurors because of their race, national origin or gender, among other categories. A “jury of your peers” doesn’t mean having a foreman with the same ankle monitoring device as the defendant.
Since the Senate Public Safety Committee vote, SB310 has since been approved by the full state Senate. It was approved on a 27-10 vote.
Look, I’m willing to compromise on this. If an ex-con wants to judge a wet T-shirt contest I say go for it. But felonies are serious business, and the public deserves honest trials with juries who will evaluate the evidence with as few biases as possible, and vote accordingly.
More importantly, that’s what victims deserve as well.
House Democrats demand Kash Patel take alcohol test under penalty of perjury after Atlantic report
Minnesota allows ‘happy hour’ in nursing homes under new law easing alcohol restrictions
ICE detains illegal immigrant accused of sexually assaulting minor after hospital parking lot birth
US military launches first-ever autonomous warfare command to deploy unmanned systems across Latin America
Top California Dem running for office tied to Chinese school accused of US diploma scandal
Appeals court rules ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ can stay open, rejecting push for federal environmental impact review
EXCLUSIVE: DHS honors angel families during National Crime Victims Week, calls crimes ‘completely preventable’
Democrats win Virginia redistricting fight, threatening Republican House majority
‘Melrose Place’ and ‘Starship Troopers’ Actor Patrick Muldoon Dies at Age 57
Top House Republican Warns Ilhan Omar That Her Financial Disclosure Revision Won’t Save Her
EXCLUSIVE: Pence warns GOP ‘must deliver,’ or Planned Parenthood gets taxpayer cash on Fourth of July deadline
House Republican Campaign Committee Blows Democrats Away with Historic Fundraising Quarter
Pro-Iran Jimmy Kimmel Mocks Peace Talks, Says He’s ‘More Likely to Believe the Ayatollah’ Than Trump
Democrat Trying to Flip Pennsylvania Seat Apologizes for Pro-Police, Pro-Gun, Pro-God Posts
Trump Recounts Helping Out ‘Incomparable’ Tim Cook as Longtime Apple CEO Steps Down
Plus, I’m just not willing to risk having a juror whose vote on guilt or innocence might be swayed by a carton of Marlboro Reds.
Could you imagine turning the news on one night and hearing the phrase: “Mr. Cosby, have you and your fellow jurors reached a verdict?”
Make no mistake, SB310 is not about expanding civil rights for persecuted minorities or reintegrating felons into society — it’s about stacking the deck against prosecutors by making it impossible to win criminal convictions.
Story cited here.
