The state of California has made no secret that it wants to let as many people out of prison as possible.
From the early release of inmates through AB 109, to filling parole boards with felon friendly commissioners, to decriminalizing a litany of felonies and drug offenses with Props 47 and 57, Sacramento lawmakers are bending over backwards to dramatically reduce the state’s inmate population.
Despite all of these efforts, the number of inmates hasn’t dropped dramatically enough to satisfy the state’s ruling Democrats, so they’re kicking tires on a new approach — rigging the jury system so no one gets convicted in the first place.
This most recent push is Senate Bill 310, authored by state Sen. Nancy Skinner, D-Berkeley, and would allow Californians who have prior felony convictions to serve on juries.
WATCH: Dem witness accuses Trump of ‘population purge,’ Kennedy fires back: ‘You trigger my gag reflex’
Far-left lawmaker endorses candidate who boasted about voting with Republicans 80% of time
California bishop’s alleged secret double life explodes into felony case
FAA Temporarily Grounds All JetBlue Flights
‘A Woke Joke’ – Fans Furious at Hypocrite Bruce Springsteen as Tickets to His ‘No Kings’ Tour Are So Expensive, Only Royalty Can Afford Them
ICE Houston touts over 400 illegal alien child sex offenders arrested during Trump’s first year back in office
Trump’s pick to lead the Federal Reserve meets GOP senator holding up his confirmation
Former DC police officer accused of sexually assaulting 10 women he met on dating apps, in person
Europe flails in response to Iran conflict as Strait of Hormuz closure threatens energy supply
Shots Fired at US Consulate in Canada in ‘Unacceptable Act of Violence’
Jackson-Kavanaugh tensions surface in candid exchange over Supreme Court ‘shadow docket’
Have you seen these people? One of them might be your next president
Mainstream Media Headlines Use Subtle Spin to Hide Truth About ISIS-Inspired NYC Attack
Gas prices surge, pinching Americans and handing the GOP a new midterm headache
Tennessee lawmakers push bill that could make them, and their donors, richer by triggering CVS closures
In a press release promoting the proposal, Skinner wrote, “SB310 will help ensure that California juries represent a fair cross-section of our communities…People with felony records have the right to vote in California. There is no legitimate reason why they should be barred from serving on a jury.”
Currently, felons are prevented from serving on juries because of their obvious and inherent bias against prosecutors and law enforcement.
If you honestly believe that jurors in California who’ve served time won’t be more lenient towards accused criminals, I’ve got a bullet train to sell you.
People who have a family member in law enforcement are excused from jury duty all the time because of the possibility of bias, even unconscious bias.
How can someone who’s served time be considered free of bias?
That’s like having crazy cat ladies vote on how many cats a person should own.
WATCH: Dem witness accuses Trump of ‘population purge,’ Kennedy fires back: ‘You trigger my gag reflex’
Far-left lawmaker endorses candidate who boasted about voting with Republicans 80% of time
California bishop’s alleged secret double life explodes into felony case
FAA Temporarily Grounds All JetBlue Flights
‘A Woke Joke’ – Fans Furious at Hypocrite Bruce Springsteen as Tickets to His ‘No Kings’ Tour Are So Expensive, Only Royalty Can Afford Them
ICE Houston touts over 400 illegal alien child sex offenders arrested during Trump’s first year back in office
Trump’s pick to lead the Federal Reserve meets GOP senator holding up his confirmation
Former DC police officer accused of sexually assaulting 10 women he met on dating apps, in person
Europe flails in response to Iran conflict as Strait of Hormuz closure threatens energy supply
Shots Fired at US Consulate in Canada in ‘Unacceptable Act of Violence’
Jackson-Kavanaugh tensions surface in candid exchange over Supreme Court ‘shadow docket’
Have you seen these people? One of them might be your next president
Mainstream Media Headlines Use Subtle Spin to Hide Truth About ISIS-Inspired NYC Attack
Gas prices surge, pinching Americans and handing the GOP a new midterm headache
Tennessee lawmakers push bill that could make them, and their donors, richer by triggering CVS closures
It should be noted that SB310 makes no distinction between violent and non-violent offenders, and even allows convicted felons who are still on probation or parole to serve.
Imagine serving your time, getting out of the clink, then getting sentenced to six months of jury duty on an insurance fraud case. Haven’t you paid your debt to society already?
Since this is California, and the idea is cartoonishly preposterous, of course it sailed through the Senate Public Safety Committee on a 5-1 vote.
In testimony to the Committee, Brendon Woods, Alameda County’s Public Defender, noted that defendants of color are often faced with juries in California in which “no one who sits in judgment looks like [them].”
In California it’s already illegal to exclude potential jurors because of their race, national origin or gender, among other categories. A “jury of your peers” doesn’t mean having a foreman with the same ankle monitoring device as the defendant.
Since the Senate Public Safety Committee vote, SB310 has since been approved by the full state Senate. It was approved on a 27-10 vote.
Look, I’m willing to compromise on this. If an ex-con wants to judge a wet T-shirt contest I say go for it. But felonies are serious business, and the public deserves honest trials with juries who will evaluate the evidence with as few biases as possible, and vote accordingly.
More importantly, that’s what victims deserve as well.
WATCH: Dem witness accuses Trump of ‘population purge,’ Kennedy fires back: ‘You trigger my gag reflex’
Far-left lawmaker endorses candidate who boasted about voting with Republicans 80% of time
California bishop’s alleged secret double life explodes into felony case
FAA Temporarily Grounds All JetBlue Flights
‘A Woke Joke’ – Fans Furious at Hypocrite Bruce Springsteen as Tickets to His ‘No Kings’ Tour Are So Expensive, Only Royalty Can Afford Them
ICE Houston touts over 400 illegal alien child sex offenders arrested during Trump’s first year back in office
Trump’s pick to lead the Federal Reserve meets GOP senator holding up his confirmation
Former DC police officer accused of sexually assaulting 10 women he met on dating apps, in person
Europe flails in response to Iran conflict as Strait of Hormuz closure threatens energy supply
Shots Fired at US Consulate in Canada in ‘Unacceptable Act of Violence’
Jackson-Kavanaugh tensions surface in candid exchange over Supreme Court ‘shadow docket’
Have you seen these people? One of them might be your next president
Mainstream Media Headlines Use Subtle Spin to Hide Truth About ISIS-Inspired NYC Attack
Gas prices surge, pinching Americans and handing the GOP a new midterm headache
Tennessee lawmakers push bill that could make them, and their donors, richer by triggering CVS closures
Plus, I’m just not willing to risk having a juror whose vote on guilt or innocence might be swayed by a carton of Marlboro Reds.
Could you imagine turning the news on one night and hearing the phrase: “Mr. Cosby, have you and your fellow jurors reached a verdict?”
Make no mistake, SB310 is not about expanding civil rights for persecuted minorities or reintegrating felons into society — it’s about stacking the deck against prosecutors by making it impossible to win criminal convictions.
Story cited here.
