The state of California has made no secret that it wants to let as many people out of prison as possible.
From the early release of inmates through AB 109, to filling parole boards with felon friendly commissioners, to decriminalizing a litany of felonies and drug offenses with Props 47 and 57, Sacramento lawmakers are bending over backwards to dramatically reduce the state’s inmate population.
Despite all of these efforts, the number of inmates hasn’t dropped dramatically enough to satisfy the state’s ruling Democrats, so they’re kicking tires on a new approach — rigging the jury system so no one gets convicted in the first place.
This most recent push is Senate Bill 310, authored by state Sen. Nancy Skinner, D-Berkeley, and would allow Californians who have prior felony convictions to serve on juries.
Biden-era FBI tracked Trump family travel and Wiles’ calls with lawyers in secret probe: docs
Supreme Court begins new term with high-profile look at clean air and federal authority
Christa Pike’s Attorney Calls for Death Penalty to Be ‘Taken Off the Table’ After Botched Execution Attempt
Furious Trump Partially Doxxes AR Sen. Tom Cotton, Sharing His Reported Cell Number to the Entire World
Emerging tech has new Army leaders warning troops can’t ‘AI’ their way to victory on the battlefield
‘American Idol’ alum Caleb Flynn weeps as daughters ask him why he killed their mother, vow not to visit him
Biden’s ‘anti-MAGA task force’ sparked internal alarm across DOJ, new report shows
El-Sayed Insider Comes Forward With Massive Amount of Dirt, from Insane Lies to Schoolboy Fascination With Gas
Florida student killed in rollover school bus crash
Yemeni government says it recaptured Bab el Mandeb Strait
Bystanders set on fire and hands blown off by grenades as France struggles to suppress violent student riots
U.S. Quickly Pulls All B-1 Bombers from U.K. Base in Wake of Terror Threat
Medicaid provider allegedly billed $165K for dead patient’s rides among fraud exposed in explosive report
Former Republican House Speaker Dennis Hastert dead at 84
Russian researcher who studied plague died of mysterious illness: What to know
In a press release promoting the proposal, Skinner wrote, “SB310 will help ensure that California juries represent a fair cross-section of our communities…People with felony records have the right to vote in California. There is no legitimate reason why they should be barred from serving on a jury.”
Currently, felons are prevented from serving on juries because of their obvious and inherent bias against prosecutors and law enforcement.
If you honestly believe that jurors in California who’ve served time won’t be more lenient towards accused criminals, I’ve got a bullet train to sell you.
People who have a family member in law enforcement are excused from jury duty all the time because of the possibility of bias, even unconscious bias.
How can someone who’s served time be considered free of bias?
That’s like having crazy cat ladies vote on how many cats a person should own.
Biden-era FBI tracked Trump family travel and Wiles’ calls with lawyers in secret probe: docs
Supreme Court begins new term with high-profile look at clean air and federal authority
Christa Pike’s Attorney Calls for Death Penalty to Be ‘Taken Off the Table’ After Botched Execution Attempt
Furious Trump Partially Doxxes AR Sen. Tom Cotton, Sharing His Reported Cell Number to the Entire World
Emerging tech has new Army leaders warning troops can’t ‘AI’ their way to victory on the battlefield
‘American Idol’ alum Caleb Flynn weeps as daughters ask him why he killed their mother, vow not to visit him
Biden’s ‘anti-MAGA task force’ sparked internal alarm across DOJ, new report shows
El-Sayed Insider Comes Forward With Massive Amount of Dirt, from Insane Lies to Schoolboy Fascination With Gas
Florida student killed in rollover school bus crash
Yemeni government says it recaptured Bab el Mandeb Strait
Bystanders set on fire and hands blown off by grenades as France struggles to suppress violent student riots
U.S. Quickly Pulls All B-1 Bombers from U.K. Base in Wake of Terror Threat
Medicaid provider allegedly billed $165K for dead patient’s rides among fraud exposed in explosive report
Former Republican House Speaker Dennis Hastert dead at 84
Russian researcher who studied plague died of mysterious illness: What to know
It should be noted that SB310 makes no distinction between violent and non-violent offenders, and even allows convicted felons who are still on probation or parole to serve.
Imagine serving your time, getting out of the clink, then getting sentenced to six months of jury duty on an insurance fraud case. Haven’t you paid your debt to society already?
Since this is California, and the idea is cartoonishly preposterous, of course it sailed through the Senate Public Safety Committee on a 5-1 vote.
In testimony to the Committee, Brendon Woods, Alameda County’s Public Defender, noted that defendants of color are often faced with juries in California in which “no one who sits in judgment looks like [them].”
In California it’s already illegal to exclude potential jurors because of their race, national origin or gender, among other categories. A “jury of your peers” doesn’t mean having a foreman with the same ankle monitoring device as the defendant.
Since the Senate Public Safety Committee vote, SB310 has since been approved by the full state Senate. It was approved on a 27-10 vote.
Look, I’m willing to compromise on this. If an ex-con wants to judge a wet T-shirt contest I say go for it. But felonies are serious business, and the public deserves honest trials with juries who will evaluate the evidence with as few biases as possible, and vote accordingly.
More importantly, that’s what victims deserve as well.
Biden-era FBI tracked Trump family travel and Wiles’ calls with lawyers in secret probe: docs
Supreme Court begins new term with high-profile look at clean air and federal authority
Christa Pike’s Attorney Calls for Death Penalty to Be ‘Taken Off the Table’ After Botched Execution Attempt
Furious Trump Partially Doxxes AR Sen. Tom Cotton, Sharing His Reported Cell Number to the Entire World
Emerging tech has new Army leaders warning troops can’t ‘AI’ their way to victory on the battlefield
‘American Idol’ alum Caleb Flynn weeps as daughters ask him why he killed their mother, vow not to visit him
Biden’s ‘anti-MAGA task force’ sparked internal alarm across DOJ, new report shows
El-Sayed Insider Comes Forward With Massive Amount of Dirt, from Insane Lies to Schoolboy Fascination With Gas
Florida student killed in rollover school bus crash
Yemeni government says it recaptured Bab el Mandeb Strait
Bystanders set on fire and hands blown off by grenades as France struggles to suppress violent student riots
U.S. Quickly Pulls All B-1 Bombers from U.K. Base in Wake of Terror Threat
Medicaid provider allegedly billed $165K for dead patient’s rides among fraud exposed in explosive report
Former Republican House Speaker Dennis Hastert dead at 84
Russian researcher who studied plague died of mysterious illness: What to know
Plus, I’m just not willing to risk having a juror whose vote on guilt or innocence might be swayed by a carton of Marlboro Reds.
Could you imagine turning the news on one night and hearing the phrase: “Mr. Cosby, have you and your fellow jurors reached a verdict?”
Make no mistake, SB310 is not about expanding civil rights for persecuted minorities or reintegrating felons into society — it’s about stacking the deck against prosecutors by making it impossible to win criminal convictions.
Story cited here.
