The state of California has made no secret that it wants to let as many people out of prison as possible.
From the early release of inmates through AB 109, to filling parole boards with felon friendly commissioners, to decriminalizing a litany of felonies and drug offenses with Props 47 and 57, Sacramento lawmakers are bending over backwards to dramatically reduce the state’s inmate population.
Despite all of these efforts, the number of inmates hasn’t dropped dramatically enough to satisfy the state’s ruling Democrats, so they’re kicking tires on a new approach — rigging the jury system so no one gets convicted in the first place.
This most recent push is Senate Bill 310, authored by state Sen. Nancy Skinner, D-Berkeley, and would allow Californians who have prior felony convictions to serve on juries.
ICE arrests illegal immigrants convicted of child rape, sexual assault, drug trafficking
Former Connecticut police chief arrested for allegedly stealing $85K in public funds
CIA retracts, revises 19 past intelligence assessments deemed politically biased
Campus Radicals Newsletter: Teacher who lost job over 2-word post breaks silence, Chicago ‘racial segregation’
Twisted: Little Girl Tells Mom She’s Afraid Trans Teacher Will Eat Her at Night, Then Mom Learns What He’s Telling Kindergartners at School
Crockett blasts ‘left’ for alleged skin darkening in ads as Texas Senate clash heats up
EPA scraps Biden coal restrictions as advocates say move will restore American dominance
Trump Accuses Supreme Court of Being Influenced by ‘Foreign Interests’ Following Tariff Ruling
Trump Slams Supreme Court for Not Addressing Tariff Refunds in Ruling: ‘Not Written by Smart People’
Omar calls GOP probe into husband’s $30M business surge a ‘political stunt’ as records deadline passes
President Trump Announces ‘Different Direction’ on Tariffs Following SCOTUS Decision, And Might Charge Countries More Than Before
Sanctuary City Detroit to Fire Cops After They Cooperated with ICE – DHS Responds
Fox News Poll: Trump’s tariffs faced broad disapproval even before Supreme Court ruling
BREAKING: Justice Clarence Thomas Issues Blistering Dissent in Tariff Case Following Trump Loss
Kim Jong Un declares ‘everything has fundamentally changed’ as world watches Workers’ Party Congress for clues
In a press release promoting the proposal, Skinner wrote, “SB310 will help ensure that California juries represent a fair cross-section of our communities…People with felony records have the right to vote in California. There is no legitimate reason why they should be barred from serving on a jury.”
Currently, felons are prevented from serving on juries because of their obvious and inherent bias against prosecutors and law enforcement.
If you honestly believe that jurors in California who’ve served time won’t be more lenient towards accused criminals, I’ve got a bullet train to sell you.
People who have a family member in law enforcement are excused from jury duty all the time because of the possibility of bias, even unconscious bias.
How can someone who’s served time be considered free of bias?
That’s like having crazy cat ladies vote on how many cats a person should own.
ICE arrests illegal immigrants convicted of child rape, sexual assault, drug trafficking
Former Connecticut police chief arrested for allegedly stealing $85K in public funds
CIA retracts, revises 19 past intelligence assessments deemed politically biased
Campus Radicals Newsletter: Teacher who lost job over 2-word post breaks silence, Chicago ‘racial segregation’
Twisted: Little Girl Tells Mom She’s Afraid Trans Teacher Will Eat Her at Night, Then Mom Learns What He’s Telling Kindergartners at School
Crockett blasts ‘left’ for alleged skin darkening in ads as Texas Senate clash heats up
EPA scraps Biden coal restrictions as advocates say move will restore American dominance
Trump Accuses Supreme Court of Being Influenced by ‘Foreign Interests’ Following Tariff Ruling
Trump Slams Supreme Court for Not Addressing Tariff Refunds in Ruling: ‘Not Written by Smart People’
Omar calls GOP probe into husband’s $30M business surge a ‘political stunt’ as records deadline passes
President Trump Announces ‘Different Direction’ on Tariffs Following SCOTUS Decision, And Might Charge Countries More Than Before
Sanctuary City Detroit to Fire Cops After They Cooperated with ICE – DHS Responds
Fox News Poll: Trump’s tariffs faced broad disapproval even before Supreme Court ruling
BREAKING: Justice Clarence Thomas Issues Blistering Dissent in Tariff Case Following Trump Loss
Kim Jong Un declares ‘everything has fundamentally changed’ as world watches Workers’ Party Congress for clues
It should be noted that SB310 makes no distinction between violent and non-violent offenders, and even allows convicted felons who are still on probation or parole to serve.
Imagine serving your time, getting out of the clink, then getting sentenced to six months of jury duty on an insurance fraud case. Haven’t you paid your debt to society already?
Since this is California, and the idea is cartoonishly preposterous, of course it sailed through the Senate Public Safety Committee on a 5-1 vote.
In testimony to the Committee, Brendon Woods, Alameda County’s Public Defender, noted that defendants of color are often faced with juries in California in which “no one who sits in judgment looks like [them].”
In California it’s already illegal to exclude potential jurors because of their race, national origin or gender, among other categories. A “jury of your peers” doesn’t mean having a foreman with the same ankle monitoring device as the defendant.
Since the Senate Public Safety Committee vote, SB310 has since been approved by the full state Senate. It was approved on a 27-10 vote.
Look, I’m willing to compromise on this. If an ex-con wants to judge a wet T-shirt contest I say go for it. But felonies are serious business, and the public deserves honest trials with juries who will evaluate the evidence with as few biases as possible, and vote accordingly.
More importantly, that’s what victims deserve as well.
ICE arrests illegal immigrants convicted of child rape, sexual assault, drug trafficking
Former Connecticut police chief arrested for allegedly stealing $85K in public funds
CIA retracts, revises 19 past intelligence assessments deemed politically biased
Campus Radicals Newsletter: Teacher who lost job over 2-word post breaks silence, Chicago ‘racial segregation’
Twisted: Little Girl Tells Mom She’s Afraid Trans Teacher Will Eat Her at Night, Then Mom Learns What He’s Telling Kindergartners at School
Crockett blasts ‘left’ for alleged skin darkening in ads as Texas Senate clash heats up
EPA scraps Biden coal restrictions as advocates say move will restore American dominance
Trump Accuses Supreme Court of Being Influenced by ‘Foreign Interests’ Following Tariff Ruling
Trump Slams Supreme Court for Not Addressing Tariff Refunds in Ruling: ‘Not Written by Smart People’
Omar calls GOP probe into husband’s $30M business surge a ‘political stunt’ as records deadline passes
President Trump Announces ‘Different Direction’ on Tariffs Following SCOTUS Decision, And Might Charge Countries More Than Before
Sanctuary City Detroit to Fire Cops After They Cooperated with ICE – DHS Responds
Fox News Poll: Trump’s tariffs faced broad disapproval even before Supreme Court ruling
BREAKING: Justice Clarence Thomas Issues Blistering Dissent in Tariff Case Following Trump Loss
Kim Jong Un declares ‘everything has fundamentally changed’ as world watches Workers’ Party Congress for clues
Plus, I’m just not willing to risk having a juror whose vote on guilt or innocence might be swayed by a carton of Marlboro Reds.
Could you imagine turning the news on one night and hearing the phrase: “Mr. Cosby, have you and your fellow jurors reached a verdict?”
Make no mistake, SB310 is not about expanding civil rights for persecuted minorities or reintegrating felons into society — it’s about stacking the deck against prosecutors by making it impossible to win criminal convictions.
Story cited here.
