Bolton Blasted by Friend, Told To Withdraw Book Immediately

A former top aide to John Bolton made a compelling case why the once-National Security Advisor to President Donald Trump should not release his tell-all book until after the 2020 election.

The New York Times reported on Sunday that Trump told Bolton in August that he wanted to put a hold on $391 million in military assistant until Ukraine agreed to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden, as well as other alleged interference by Ukrainians in the 2016 election, according to an unpublished manuscript of Bolton’s book, due to be released in March.

Fred Fleitz, who describes himself as a friend of Bolton and served as his chief of staff in both the Trump and George W. Bush administrations, believes his former boss is setting a bad precedent if Bolton allows his book “The Room Where It Happened” to be published before the upcoming presidential election.

“Given the importance of protecting a president’s confidential discussions with his senior advisers, I strongly disagree with Bolton’s decision to release the book before the November presidential election and call on him to withdraw it from the publisher immediately,” Fleitz wrote in an Op-Ed for Fox News.

Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner embraces democratic socialism at Bernie Sanders rally in Portland

Jacob Frey criticized for remembering George Floyd on Memorial Day, six years after death sparked riots

Widow of ‘American Sniper’ Chris Kyle Hits Back Against Dem Senate Candidate for ‘Making Things Up’

Watch: Trump Sums Up Memorial Day Better and Quicker Than Any President in Living Memory – Just 9 Words

President Trump Explains Importance of Memorial Day in Rousing Speech: ‘The Ultimate Sacrifice’

Dem City Gave Muslim Group $35k and Didn’t Track How It Was Spent

Anti-ICE protesters clash with agents outside New Jersey detention center as Gov Sherrill denied entry

Lawmaker Convicted Under ‘Crimes Against Humanity’ Law for Writing Pro-Marriage Pamphlet

Stomach Churning: Paragliding Woman Videos Herself Plummeting After Mid-Air Crash With Plane

Hero Vet Whom Graham Platner Said Didn’t Deserve to Live Unleashes Tactical Brilliance, Leaves Dems in Painful Dilemma

DNC Finally Releases 2024 Election Autopsy Containing Conclusions Sure to Cause Party Division

Trump calls on Arab nations to sign Abraham Accords

New Jersey governor, Democratic senator spend Memorial Day protesting ICE facility

Sex Trafficking: More Disastrous Graham Platner Comments Surface as Dem Buyers Regret Reaches New High

Hollywood Ignored the ‘Project Hail Mary’ Blueprint as ‘Star Wars’ Stumbles and Nolan’s ‘Odyssey’ Looks Headed for Trouble

“Presidents must be able to candidly consult with their advisers without worrying they will leak these discussions to the press or obtain high-dollar book contracts to publish them,” he continued.

“A book by a former national security adviser ahead of a president’s reelection bid may set a dangerous precedent since it could discourage future presidents from seeking advice from expert advisers on sensitive national security matters.”

Fleitz offered the example of former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who stepped down from his post in the Obama administration in June 2011.

Gates waited until January 2014, after President Barack Obama’s re-election, to release his book “Duty: Memoirs of a Secretary at War,” which detailed what the former DOD secretary believed to be serious incompetence among the commander in chief’s national security team, including then-Vice President Joe Biden.

Fleitz wrote that the reason Gates waited was that he “did not want his internal knowledge of the workings of the Obama administration and his interactions with President Obama to affect the outcome of the 2012 presidential election.”

“Gates established a principled precedent on how senior advisers to presidents should write about their experiences,” Fleitz argued. “Given Ambassador Bolton’s long and distinguished record of government service, I believe it is vital that he follow this precedent.”

Conservative commentator Mark Levin sees the release of the alleged details from Bolton’s book manuscript as another example of a “politically timed leak,” which in the end really should have no bearing on Trump’s impeachment trial.