Bolton Blasted by Friend, Told To Withdraw Book Immediately

A former top aide to John Bolton made a compelling case why the once-National Security Advisor to President Donald Trump should not release his tell-all book until after the 2020 election.

The New York Times reported on Sunday that Trump told Bolton in August that he wanted to put a hold on $391 million in military assistant until Ukraine agreed to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden, as well as other alleged interference by Ukrainians in the 2016 election, according to an unpublished manuscript of Bolton’s book, due to be released in March.

Fred Fleitz, who describes himself as a friend of Bolton and served as his chief of staff in both the Trump and George W. Bush administrations, believes his former boss is setting a bad precedent if Bolton allows his book “The Room Where It Happened” to be published before the upcoming presidential election.

“Given the importance of protecting a president’s confidential discussions with his senior advisers, I strongly disagree with Bolton’s decision to release the book before the November presidential election and call on him to withdraw it from the publisher immediately,” Fleitz wrote in an Op-Ed for Fox News.

‘Smart decision’: Swalwell’s resignation spurs praise from both parties after bombshell allegations emerge

US military kills 2 suspected cartel operatives in latest Eastern Pacific lethal strike, SOUTHCOM says

Swalwell’s ‘best friend’ in Congress turns on him after bombshell allegations torpedo his political career

Hegseth-affiliated pastor Doug Wilson says Trump ‘has to do better’ after AI Jesus debacle

Protests erupt in Ireland over high fuel costs caused by war in Iran

BREAKING: Second Member of Congress Announces He Will Resign, Papers to Be Filed Tuesday

DoorDash driver hails key Trump policy after delivering McDonald’s to White House: ‘I’m going to enjoy it’

Gabbard claims ‘coordinated effort’ by intelligence community to advance narrative to impeach Trump

Embattled Rep Tony Gonzales announces plans to resign amid sexual misconduct allegations

Tyler Robinson’s Legal Team Calls In Expert Witness Who Worked on Bryan Kohberger Case

Butler man’s online rants to kill Trump end in guilty plea after FBI probe

BREAKING: Eric Swalwell Has Announced His Resignation from the US House of Representative

Trump Uses DoorDash to Order McDonald’s Before WH News Conference, Tips Driver $100

WATCH: Laura Ingraham Beat Down GOP Rep. Mike Lawler on Air When She Appeared to Know the DIGNIDAD Act He’s Cosponsoring Better Than He Did

Tulsi Gabbard Releases New Documents Showing ‘Conspiracy Used by Congress to Impeach President Trump’

“Presidents must be able to candidly consult with their advisers without worrying they will leak these discussions to the press or obtain high-dollar book contracts to publish them,” he continued.

“A book by a former national security adviser ahead of a president’s reelection bid may set a dangerous precedent since it could discourage future presidents from seeking advice from expert advisers on sensitive national security matters.”

Fleitz offered the example of former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who stepped down from his post in the Obama administration in June 2011.

Gates waited until January 2014, after President Barack Obama’s re-election, to release his book “Duty: Memoirs of a Secretary at War,” which detailed what the former DOD secretary believed to be serious incompetence among the commander in chief’s national security team, including then-Vice President Joe Biden.

Fleitz wrote that the reason Gates waited was that he “did not want his internal knowledge of the workings of the Obama administration and his interactions with President Obama to affect the outcome of the 2012 presidential election.”

“Gates established a principled precedent on how senior advisers to presidents should write about their experiences,” Fleitz argued. “Given Ambassador Bolton’s long and distinguished record of government service, I believe it is vital that he follow this precedent.”

Conservative commentator Mark Levin sees the release of the alleged details from Bolton’s book manuscript as another example of a “politically timed leak,” which in the end really should have no bearing on Trump’s impeachment trial.