Bolton Blasted by Friend, Told To Withdraw Book Immediately

A former top aide to John Bolton made a compelling case why the once-National Security Advisor to President Donald Trump should not release his tell-all book until after the 2020 election.

The New York Times reported on Sunday that Trump told Bolton in August that he wanted to put a hold on $391 million in military assistant until Ukraine agreed to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden, as well as other alleged interference by Ukrainians in the 2016 election, according to an unpublished manuscript of Bolton’s book, due to be released in March.

Fred Fleitz, who describes himself as a friend of Bolton and served as his chief of staff in both the Trump and George W. Bush administrations, believes his former boss is setting a bad precedent if Bolton allows his book “The Room Where It Happened” to be published before the upcoming presidential election.

“Given the importance of protecting a president’s confidential discussions with his senior advisers, I strongly disagree with Bolton’s decision to release the book before the November presidential election and call on him to withdraw it from the publisher immediately,” Fleitz wrote in an Op-Ed for Fox News.

Guards at ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ beat, pepper-sprayed detainees, lawyer says

‘We’re taxing the rich’: NYC Mayor Mamdani touts new $500M-a-year tax on luxury second homes

Navy reservist accused of murdering wife and hiding her body in freezer arrested after international manhunt

Watch: Comedian Dave Chappelle Refuses to Let NPR Reporter Shame Him for Trans Jokes

Sotomayor walks back remarks criticizing Kavanaugh, says comments were ‘inappropriate’

Leftist Darlng Hasan Piker Given Chance to Walk Back Hamas Sympathy – Instead, He Says He’d ‘Vote’ for Them

Democratic secretary of state was ‘prepared’ for FBI raid in Arizona, emails show

ODNI sends criminal referrals to DOJ for ex-IG, whistleblower tied to Trump impeachment

Catholic JFK Laid Out How Presidents Should Deal With Papal Criticism in Famous 1960 Speech

School Agrees to Pay Up After Counselor Was Fired for Objecting to Transgender Policy

Woman added to FBI’s Ten Most Wanted list arrested hours later after tips poured in from Florida: Patel

Congress mulls compelling testimony from ActBlue leadership

Hunter Biden now living abroad as legal troubles mount, court filing reveals

DC curfew ends as teen takeover fears clock in – city braces for chaos amid spring break mayhem

Bessent ‘optimistic’ gas prices will fall to $3 a gallon by midsummer

“Presidents must be able to candidly consult with their advisers without worrying they will leak these discussions to the press or obtain high-dollar book contracts to publish them,” he continued.

“A book by a former national security adviser ahead of a president’s reelection bid may set a dangerous precedent since it could discourage future presidents from seeking advice from expert advisers on sensitive national security matters.”

Fleitz offered the example of former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who stepped down from his post in the Obama administration in June 2011.

Gates waited until January 2014, after President Barack Obama’s re-election, to release his book “Duty: Memoirs of a Secretary at War,” which detailed what the former DOD secretary believed to be serious incompetence among the commander in chief’s national security team, including then-Vice President Joe Biden.

Fleitz wrote that the reason Gates waited was that he “did not want his internal knowledge of the workings of the Obama administration and his interactions with President Obama to affect the outcome of the 2012 presidential election.”

“Gates established a principled precedent on how senior advisers to presidents should write about their experiences,” Fleitz argued. “Given Ambassador Bolton’s long and distinguished record of government service, I believe it is vital that he follow this precedent.”

Conservative commentator Mark Levin sees the release of the alleged details from Bolton’s book manuscript as another example of a “politically timed leak,” which in the end really should have no bearing on Trump’s impeachment trial.