Congress will be taking a close look at the power of big tech.
The House Judiciary Committee announced Monday that it will hold a series of hearings as part of a bipartisan investigation into whether there is enough competition among U.S. technology companies.
While no companies were named, any investigation will inevitably touch on Amazon, Facebook, Google and Apple, all of which have come under increased scrutiny in recent years for their dominance in a variety of markets including social networking, online advertising, online search, e-commerce and mobile apps.
“A small number of dominant, unregulated platforms have extraordinary power over commerce, communication, and information online,” the Judiciary Committee noted in a news release that included the names of both Democratic and Republican members. “Based on investigative reporting and oversight by international policymakers and enforcers, there are concerns that these platforms have the incentive and ability to harm the competitive process.”
“The Antitrust Subcommittee will conduct a top-to-bottom review of the market power held by giant tech platforms. This is the first time Congress has undertaken an investigation into this behavior.”
Wisconsin Dems Cruelly Mock Retired Republican Senator Suffering Multiple Personal Tragedies
The Iran Conflict Exposed America’s Major Energy Weakness: Global Oil
Chicago residents unionize to fight possible displacement, rent hikes over Obama Presidential Center
Watch: College Student Wants ‘Condemption’ of Rapists but Doesn’t Want ICE to Remove Them – She Also Can’t Figure Out What ICE Stands For
Trump says ICE will deploy to airports Monday to assist TSA amid funding standoff
Dem Governor Begs Rich People Who Fled New York For Florida To Return And Foot Bill For ‘Generous Social Programs’
Former FBI agent Robert Levinson’s disappearance still unsolved as bureau presses for new tips
NYC’s First Lady Exposed Approving of Suicide Attack Propaganda, Plane Hijackers, and Outrageous Attacks on US Troops
Tensions and deadlocks over Trump’s US attorney picks hit fever pitch
Jewish voters feel ‘politically homeless’ as antisemitism rises on both sides
Pence: Trump upended ‘some aspects’ of GOP agenda but ‘hasn’t really changed the Republican Party’
Virginia Democrats push gambling bill after taking massive donations from gambling company
Fairfax County ignored 2023 detainer against illegal immigrant now accused of murder, ICE says
Man found not guilty by reason of insanity in killing of pregnant Seattle woman, unborn child
Woman claims space rock smashed into house after Houston-area blast rattles residents
One area of the investigation is likely to be particularly unwelcome among tech executives: The committee said it would look into whether existing antitrust laws and enforcement levels are adequate to address the growing concentration of power in the tech industry.
“Given the growing tide of concentration and consolidation across our economy, it is vital that we investigate the current state of competition in digital markets and the health of the antitrust laws,” committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., said in the announcement.
The news comes just as the federal government has reportedly been preparing to ramp up its antitrust oversight of U.S. tech companies amid growing political pressure that has included increasing scrutiny from both parties.
Google and Amazon declined to comment. Requests for comment from Apple and Facebook were not immediately returned.
Calls to rein in major U.S. tech companies — either by cracking down on how the companies use their power or by breaking them up — began to circulate in recent years among some academics and activists but did not receive mainstream attention until the past year, when elected officials and even some in the tech industry began openly call for action.
Wisconsin Dems Cruelly Mock Retired Republican Senator Suffering Multiple Personal Tragedies
The Iran Conflict Exposed America’s Major Energy Weakness: Global Oil
Chicago residents unionize to fight possible displacement, rent hikes over Obama Presidential Center
Watch: College Student Wants ‘Condemption’ of Rapists but Doesn’t Want ICE to Remove Them – She Also Can’t Figure Out What ICE Stands For
Trump says ICE will deploy to airports Monday to assist TSA amid funding standoff
Dem Governor Begs Rich People Who Fled New York For Florida To Return And Foot Bill For ‘Generous Social Programs’
Former FBI agent Robert Levinson’s disappearance still unsolved as bureau presses for new tips
NYC’s First Lady Exposed Approving of Suicide Attack Propaganda, Plane Hijackers, and Outrageous Attacks on US Troops
Tensions and deadlocks over Trump’s US attorney picks hit fever pitch
Jewish voters feel ‘politically homeless’ as antisemitism rises on both sides
Pence: Trump upended ‘some aspects’ of GOP agenda but ‘hasn’t really changed the Republican Party’
Virginia Democrats push gambling bill after taking massive donations from gambling company
Fairfax County ignored 2023 detainer against illegal immigrant now accused of murder, ICE says
Man found not guilty by reason of insanity in killing of pregnant Seattle woman, unborn child
Woman claims space rock smashed into house after Houston-area blast rattles residents
In March, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., publicly called for the break-up of Facebook, Google and Amazon. Since then, other prominent Democrats and even some Republicans have voiced support for either splitting up the major tech companies or taking action to address their power. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., recently told NBC News that he thought Warren’s plan to break up the companies might not go far enough.
While public sentiment has also turned on some tech companies, Jim Sensenbrenner, R-Wis, the ranking member of the antitrust subcommittee, cautioned against jumping to conclusions.
“As the world becomes more dependent on a digital marketplace, we must discuss how the regulatory framework is built to ensure fairness and competition,” Sensenbrenner said. “I believe these hearings can be informative, but it is important for us to avoid any predetermined conclusions.”
Story cited here.
