Finance News

Big Tech Faces Antitrust Crackdown from House Judiciary

Congress will be taking a close look at the power of big tech.

The House Judiciary Committee announced Monday that it will hold a series of hearings as part of a bipartisan investigation into whether there is enough competition among U.S. technology companies.

While no companies were named, any investigation will inevitably touch on Amazon, Facebook, Google and Apple, all of which have come under increased scrutiny in recent years for their dominance in a variety of markets including social networking, online advertising, online search, e-commerce and mobile apps.


“A small number of dominant, unregulated platforms have extraordinary power over commerce, communication, and information online,” the Judiciary Committee noted in a news release that included the names of both Democratic and Republican members. “Based on investigative reporting and oversight by international policymakers and enforcers, there are concerns that these platforms have the incentive and ability to harm the competitive process.”

“The Antitrust Subcommittee will conduct a top-to-bottom review of the market power held by giant tech platforms. This is the first time Congress has undertaken an investigation into this behavior.”


Mamdani’s racial equity plan a hidden ‘moving the goalposts’ ploy to justify massive gov expansion: expert
ACLU, NAACP accused of trying to ‘sabotage’ US tourism with ‘fearmongering’ campaign
US military conducts strike on another boat carrying alleged narco-traffickers, killing 3
New York woman convicted for throwing dynamite at boyfriend, blowing off his hand as he tried to get rid of it
Obama says motive unclear despite manifesto outlining alleged targets in WHCD shooting
White House Correspondents’ Dinner shooting: Timeline traces how suspect’s alleged cross-country plan unfolded
Wisconsin Dem’s bar laments ‘we almost got free beer day’ for Trump assassination
Full WHCD Shooter Manifesto: He Told Family He Was Willing to Kill ‘Most Everyone’ at Dinner to Get to Trump
The Reasons Why TDS Still Exists Despite Trump’s Historic Wins
Unearthed video reveals Cole Allen as quiet inventor years before alleged bid to assassinate Trump
At Least 4 Christian Farmers Gunned Down in Their Fields by Motorcycle Mounted Islamists in Nigeria
WHCD shooting suspect planned to target Trump officials, manifesto reveals
What to know about Cole Thomas Allen, the Trump dinner shooting suspect
Breaking: WHCD Gunman Manifesto, Social Accounts Found – He Targeted Trump, Was a ‘No Kings’ Rally Attendee
The Good, the Bad, And the Ugly: Inside Swamp’s New Farm Bill
See also  Iran fires on multiple ships in Strait of Hormuz after ceasefire extension

One area of the investigation is likely to be particularly unwelcome among tech executives: The committee said it would look into whether existing antitrust laws and enforcement levels are adequate to address the growing concentration of power in the tech industry.

“Given the growing tide of concentration and consolidation across our economy, it is vital that we investigate the current state of competition in digital markets and the health of the antitrust laws,” committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., said in the announcement.

The news comes just as the federal government has reportedly been preparing to ramp up its antitrust oversight of U.S. tech companies amid growing political pressure that has included increasing scrutiny from both parties.

Google and Amazon declined to comment. Requests for comment from Apple and Facebook were not immediately returned.

Calls to rein in major U.S. tech companies — either by cracking down on how the companies use their power or by breaking them up — began to circulate in recent years among some academics and activists but did not receive mainstream attention until the past year, when elected officials and even some in the tech industry began openly call for action.


Mamdani’s racial equity plan a hidden ‘moving the goalposts’ ploy to justify massive gov expansion: expert
ACLU, NAACP accused of trying to ‘sabotage’ US tourism with ‘fearmongering’ campaign
US military conducts strike on another boat carrying alleged narco-traffickers, killing 3
New York woman convicted for throwing dynamite at boyfriend, blowing off his hand as he tried to get rid of it
Obama says motive unclear despite manifesto outlining alleged targets in WHCD shooting
White House Correspondents’ Dinner shooting: Timeline traces how suspect’s alleged cross-country plan unfolded
Wisconsin Dem’s bar laments ‘we almost got free beer day’ for Trump assassination
Full WHCD Shooter Manifesto: He Told Family He Was Willing to Kill ‘Most Everyone’ at Dinner to Get to Trump
The Reasons Why TDS Still Exists Despite Trump’s Historic Wins
Unearthed video reveals Cole Allen as quiet inventor years before alleged bid to assassinate Trump
At Least 4 Christian Farmers Gunned Down in Their Fields by Motorcycle Mounted Islamists in Nigeria
WHCD shooting suspect planned to target Trump officials, manifesto reveals
What to know about Cole Thomas Allen, the Trump dinner shooting suspect
Breaking: WHCD Gunman Manifesto, Social Accounts Found – He Targeted Trump, Was a ‘No Kings’ Rally Attendee
The Good, the Bad, And the Ugly: Inside Swamp’s New Farm Bill
See also  How Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison is embroiled in the Feeding Our Future scandal

In March, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., publicly called for the break-up of Facebook, Google and Amazon. Since then, other prominent Democrats and even some Republicans have voiced support for either splitting up the major tech companies or taking action to address their power. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., recently told NBC News that he thought Warren’s plan to break up the companies might not go far enough.

While public sentiment has also turned on some tech companies, Jim Sensenbrenner, R-Wis, the ranking member of the antitrust subcommittee, cautioned against jumping to conclusions.

“As the world becomes more dependent on a digital marketplace, we must discuss how the regulatory framework is built to ensure fairness and competition,” Sensenbrenner said. “I believe these hearings can be informative, but it is important for us to avoid any predetermined conclusions.”

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter