Finance News

Big Tech Faces Antitrust Crackdown from House Judiciary

Congress will be taking a close look at the power of big tech.

The House Judiciary Committee announced Monday that it will hold a series of hearings as part of a bipartisan investigation into whether there is enough competition among U.S. technology companies.

While no companies were named, any investigation will inevitably touch on Amazon, Facebook, Google and Apple, all of which have come under increased scrutiny in recent years for their dominance in a variety of markets including social networking, online advertising, online search, e-commerce and mobile apps.


“A small number of dominant, unregulated platforms have extraordinary power over commerce, communication, and information online,” the Judiciary Committee noted in a news release that included the names of both Democratic and Republican members. “Based on investigative reporting and oversight by international policymakers and enforcers, there are concerns that these platforms have the incentive and ability to harm the competitive process.”

“The Antitrust Subcommittee will conduct a top-to-bottom review of the market power held by giant tech platforms. This is the first time Congress has undertaken an investigation into this behavior.”


Reporter’s Notebook: GOP bets on fraud crackdown as economic woes surge ahead of midterms
California election limbo fueled by 4 pressure points dragging out vote count, expert says
America at 250: The American Dream Still Begins With Marriage
The People Connected to the New UFO Reveals Give Good Reason for Skepticism
Schumer rips Senate Republicans for passing billions in ICE and Border Patrol funding in late-night vote
Democrat Abdul el Sayed clinches UAW support over primary rivals for Michigan Senate
Bessent flips script on shouting Democrat: ‘No wonder people are leaving’ his blue state
Dems Despise Normal, Masculine Men, Which is Why They Elevate People Like Tim Walz and Graham Platner
Watch: The Moment Unhinged Rep. Green Repeatedly Yells ‘Shut up!’ at Sec. Mullin in Middle of Hearing
Cops arrest 14-year-old accused of gunning down business school graduate on way to ballgame
Breaking: New Hiring Twice as High as Economists Expected in Gangbusters Jobs Report
2 States Aren’t Just Defying ‘Pride Month,’ They’re Replacing Pagan Celebration With ‘Nuclear Family Month’
Kennedy Center still committed to recognizing Trump while adhering to order to remove his name
The Octagon on the South Lawn: Trump’s UFC Freedom 250 White House extravaganza
Democrat bankrolling Graham Platner’s campaign ripped for downplaying abuse allegations and more top headlines
See also  Thune moves to neutralize immigration bill landmines from DOJ lawfare fund

One area of the investigation is likely to be particularly unwelcome among tech executives: The committee said it would look into whether existing antitrust laws and enforcement levels are adequate to address the growing concentration of power in the tech industry.

“Given the growing tide of concentration and consolidation across our economy, it is vital that we investigate the current state of competition in digital markets and the health of the antitrust laws,” committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., said in the announcement.

The news comes just as the federal government has reportedly been preparing to ramp up its antitrust oversight of U.S. tech companies amid growing political pressure that has included increasing scrutiny from both parties.

Google and Amazon declined to comment. Requests for comment from Apple and Facebook were not immediately returned.

Calls to rein in major U.S. tech companies — either by cracking down on how the companies use their power or by breaking them up — began to circulate in recent years among some academics and activists but did not receive mainstream attention until the past year, when elected officials and even some in the tech industry began openly call for action.


Reporter’s Notebook: GOP bets on fraud crackdown as economic woes surge ahead of midterms
California election limbo fueled by 4 pressure points dragging out vote count, expert says
America at 250: The American Dream Still Begins With Marriage
The People Connected to the New UFO Reveals Give Good Reason for Skepticism
Schumer rips Senate Republicans for passing billions in ICE and Border Patrol funding in late-night vote
Democrat Abdul el Sayed clinches UAW support over primary rivals for Michigan Senate
Bessent flips script on shouting Democrat: ‘No wonder people are leaving’ his blue state
Dems Despise Normal, Masculine Men, Which is Why They Elevate People Like Tim Walz and Graham Platner
Watch: The Moment Unhinged Rep. Green Repeatedly Yells ‘Shut up!’ at Sec. Mullin in Middle of Hearing
Cops arrest 14-year-old accused of gunning down business school graduate on way to ballgame
Breaking: New Hiring Twice as High as Economists Expected in Gangbusters Jobs Report
2 States Aren’t Just Defying ‘Pride Month,’ They’re Replacing Pagan Celebration With ‘Nuclear Family Month’
Kennedy Center still committed to recognizing Trump while adhering to order to remove his name
The Octagon on the South Lawn: Trump’s UFC Freedom 250 White House extravaganza
Democrat bankrolling Graham Platner’s campaign ripped for downplaying abuse allegations and more top headlines
See also  Newsom slams MAGA for its ‘melt down’ over Pride Month

In March, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., publicly called for the break-up of Facebook, Google and Amazon. Since then, other prominent Democrats and even some Republicans have voiced support for either splitting up the major tech companies or taking action to address their power. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., recently told NBC News that he thought Warren’s plan to break up the companies might not go far enough.

While public sentiment has also turned on some tech companies, Jim Sensenbrenner, R-Wis, the ranking member of the antitrust subcommittee, cautioned against jumping to conclusions.

“As the world becomes more dependent on a digital marketplace, we must discuss how the regulatory framework is built to ensure fairness and competition,” Sensenbrenner said. “I believe these hearings can be informative, but it is important for us to avoid any predetermined conclusions.”

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter