Beto O’Rourke is one of the top contenders for the Democrat presidential primary.
Some pundits think he could even beat Donald Trump.
But that could go out the window after he was accused of doing something illegal with his campaign money.
ICE highlights ‘best of the best’ agents who jumped into action at crash sites
‘Mind chess,’ not threats, convinced real-life Sopranos mobster to cooperate: retired FBI agent
House Democrat calls Trump’s Maduro capture ‘welcome news’ as left labels it ‘illegal’
Stephen Miller Announces Major Family News
Trump Admin Suspends Thousands of ‘Minnesota Borrowers’ Over Suspected Fraud
The Bail Project spent $91M freeing criminal suspects, including some who later committed murder
Four legislative priorities waiting for House members in 2026
Hundreds of Thousands Sign Petition Against Macron Swapping Notre Dame Stained Glass with Modern Replacements
Minnesota faces funding deadline after Trump administration freezes child care payments
New York Parents Say Kids Freeze During Rides to School Because of Electric Buses
Trump and the White House go on defense over health concerns
Public trust in the government at one of its lowest points
Trump-aligned super PAC enters 2026 midterms with nearly $300M war chest
Key takeaways from Jack Smith’s testimony to House Judiciary Committee
Supreme Court tariffs case, Fed chair pick loom as twin tests for Trump’s economic agenda in 2026
Reporters are pouring through Beto O’Rourke’s first quarter fundraising report.
And The Daily Caller noticed something strange.
O’Rourke’s campaign paid over $100,000 to a web development company that was owned by his wife.
The Daily Caller reports:
Democratic presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke paid roughly $110,000 in campaign funds to a web development company while either he or his wife owned it, public records show.
Beto for Texas paid Stanton Street Technology Group $58,544 during the 2011-12 election cycle, $39,060 during the 2013-14 cycle, $9,290 in the 2015-16 cycle and $32,778 during the 2017-18 cycle, according to Federal Election Commission (FEC) records reviewed by The Daily Caller News Foundation.
Either O’Rourke or his wife owned Stanton Street — a small web development firm that O’Rourke founded in 1998 — during the vast majority of those payments. Such payments are legal, so long as the campaign is charged for the actual cost of the services, but ethics watchdogs have criticized the practice as a form of self-dealing.
O’Rourke’s wife, Amy Sanders O’Rourke, took over Stanton Street as the Texas Democrat entered Congress in January 2013. She controlled it until early 2017.
It’s not illegal to hire vendors connected to your family.
What is illegal is paying above or below market value for those services.
Now reporters and campaign finance sleuths will dig into O’Rourke’s report and this contract with Stanton Street to see if he broke the law.
