Beto O’Rourke is one of the top contenders for the Democrat presidential primary.
Some pundits think he could even beat Donald Trump.
But that could go out the window after he was accused of doing something illegal with his campaign money.
Latest Trump assassination attempt exposes ‘educated assassins’ moral crisis, university president says
ATF to Bring Back Sanity and Reject ‘Gender Identity’ on Gun Background Checks
Ridglan Farms beagles begin leaving Wisconsin facility after rescue groups strike deal for release
Christian School Wins Enormous Settlement After Its Team Refuses to Face Team With ‘Trans’ Player
The Democrats who are scrambling after Florida passed DeSantis’s map gerrymander
Cole Allen’s defense lawyers say he has been removed from suicide watch
Patel says FBI has cut bureaucracy, moved 1,000 agents to field offices in ‘generational’ overhaul
Dem Senate candidate Sherrod Brown claims he supports ‘closing the border’; GOP says record proves otherwise
Dem Deletes X Posts After Trashing State She Is Seeking to Represent
Steak n’ Shake Worker Murdered Over Argument About Onion Rings
Obama-era ‘clean energy’ solar power plant still uses fossil fuels – and kills thousands of birds annually
School Officer Stops Armed Teenager Before He Enters Building
2 US service members missing in Morocco after multinational military exercise, search underway
Colorado Dems Pass Law Banning Pet Stores from Selling Dogs and Cats
Rubio to visit Italy, Vatican amid troop drawdown call, tension with Trump, Pope Leo: reports
Reporters are pouring through Beto O’Rourke’s first quarter fundraising report.
And The Daily Caller noticed something strange.
O’Rourke’s campaign paid over $100,000 to a web development company that was owned by his wife.
The Daily Caller reports:
Democratic presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke paid roughly $110,000 in campaign funds to a web development company while either he or his wife owned it, public records show.
Beto for Texas paid Stanton Street Technology Group $58,544 during the 2011-12 election cycle, $39,060 during the 2013-14 cycle, $9,290 in the 2015-16 cycle and $32,778 during the 2017-18 cycle, according to Federal Election Commission (FEC) records reviewed by The Daily Caller News Foundation.
Either O’Rourke or his wife owned Stanton Street — a small web development firm that O’Rourke founded in 1998 — during the vast majority of those payments. Such payments are legal, so long as the campaign is charged for the actual cost of the services, but ethics watchdogs have criticized the practice as a form of self-dealing.
O’Rourke’s wife, Amy Sanders O’Rourke, took over Stanton Street as the Texas Democrat entered Congress in January 2013. She controlled it until early 2017.
It’s not illegal to hire vendors connected to your family.
What is illegal is paying above or below market value for those services.
Now reporters and campaign finance sleuths will dig into O’Rourke’s report and this contract with Stanton Street to see if he broke the law.
