Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., specified Tuesday how he would pay for his “Medicare for All”program, which critics have lambasted for its cost and impact on the federal budget.
While campaigning in New Hampshire, he responded to an audience member’s question about payment by saying he would likely raise payroll taxes on employers as well as income taxes on high-income earners.
“It would cost you and ordinary Americans a lot less than you are currently spending on average,” he said before explaining his payment method.
“What it will probably end up looking like is a payroll tax on employers, an increase in income tax in a progressive way for ordinary people — with a significant deductible for low-income people who pay nothing for it,” he said.
NASA chief pulls back curtain on Trump UFO files after bizarre finds surface in buried fed records
Report: NBA Team Could Interview Woke Women’s College Coach for Head Coaching Job
Democrats break with scandal-plagued Graham Platner, warn of ‘civil war’ in party
Uganda closes border with Congo after surge of rare Ebola cases
Anna ‘Delvey’ Sorokin still posting from New York City as DHS signals her deportation may finally be coming
Federal agents in New Jersey beat back anti-ICE agitators in chaos outside Delaney Hall detention facility
Pro Bowl NFL Running Back Arrested on 5 Charges
US Military Carries Out Deadly Strike on Drug-Smuggling Vessel in Eastern Pacific
U.S. Rushing to Set Up Ebola Quarantine Facility: Report
ACLU hit with foreign money complaint as new election law faces major test
New York sheriffs ‘mad as hell’ as Hochul pushes to ban key law enforcement partnership
WATCH: Purple Heart veteran reacts to Platner’s refusal to apologize for mocking him, shreds PTSD excuse
Israel kills top Hamas military chief in airstrike
Pakistan: America’s most complicated ally — and why Trump is betting on it again
Russia’s drone invasion and the grim realities of remote combat: ‘It’s gonna kill you’
He also said his campaign purposefully didn’t put out a detailed account of his payment plan because it would “engender enormous debate.”
Sanders was just one of many progressive, 2020 candidates to advance “Medicare for All” and other policies, prompting more vigorous debate about socialism in the United States.
The proposal has received varying cost estimates from different organizations. According to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, one Medicare for All proposal from Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash. would cost about $28 trillion – $32 trillion over a decade.
The American Action Forum, a conservative think tank, estimated the Green New Deal’s provision for universal health care would cost $36 trillion, with $260,000 in cost per household.
NASA chief pulls back curtain on Trump UFO files after bizarre finds surface in buried fed records
Report: NBA Team Could Interview Woke Women’s College Coach for Head Coaching Job
Democrats break with scandal-plagued Graham Platner, warn of ‘civil war’ in party
Uganda closes border with Congo after surge of rare Ebola cases
Anna ‘Delvey’ Sorokin still posting from New York City as DHS signals her deportation may finally be coming
Federal agents in New Jersey beat back anti-ICE agitators in chaos outside Delaney Hall detention facility
Pro Bowl NFL Running Back Arrested on 5 Charges
US Military Carries Out Deadly Strike on Drug-Smuggling Vessel in Eastern Pacific
U.S. Rushing to Set Up Ebola Quarantine Facility: Report
ACLU hit with foreign money complaint as new election law faces major test
New York sheriffs ‘mad as hell’ as Hochul pushes to ban key law enforcement partnership
WATCH: Purple Heart veteran reacts to Platner’s refusal to apologize for mocking him, shreds PTSD excuse
Israel kills top Hamas military chief in airstrike
Pakistan: America’s most complicated ally — and why Trump is betting on it again
Russia’s drone invasion and the grim realities of remote combat: ‘It’s gonna kill you’
Another study from the Mercatus Institute, typically perceived as leaning right on fiscal issues, similarly predicted in 2018 that the cost would reach $32 trillion in 10 years but forsaw a scenario in which the nation could actually save more than $2 trillion on health expenditures.
An alternative scenario, accounting for less effective cost controls, would result in more than $3 trillion in additional costs. Mercatus also claimed that its study’s author thought the assumptions showing cost-savings may be unreasonable.
When Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Seema Verma commented on the issue in April, she described the program as “the biggest threat to the American health care system.”
“What we’re talking about is stripping people of their private health insurance, forcing them into a government-run program,” she said. Her concerns echoed those of others who worried about the impact on existing health plans.
NASA chief pulls back curtain on Trump UFO files after bizarre finds surface in buried fed records
Report: NBA Team Could Interview Woke Women’s College Coach for Head Coaching Job
Democrats break with scandal-plagued Graham Platner, warn of ‘civil war’ in party
Uganda closes border with Congo after surge of rare Ebola cases
Anna ‘Delvey’ Sorokin still posting from New York City as DHS signals her deportation may finally be coming
Federal agents in New Jersey beat back anti-ICE agitators in chaos outside Delaney Hall detention facility
Pro Bowl NFL Running Back Arrested on 5 Charges
US Military Carries Out Deadly Strike on Drug-Smuggling Vessel in Eastern Pacific
U.S. Rushing to Set Up Ebola Quarantine Facility: Report
ACLU hit with foreign money complaint as new election law faces major test
New York sheriffs ‘mad as hell’ as Hochul pushes to ban key law enforcement partnership
WATCH: Purple Heart veteran reacts to Platner’s refusal to apologize for mocking him, shreds PTSD excuse
Israel kills top Hamas military chief in airstrike
Pakistan: America’s most complicated ally — and why Trump is betting on it again
Russia’s drone invasion and the grim realities of remote combat: ‘It’s gonna kill you’
Sanders and others have championed universal health care as a human rights issue — citing the U.S.’s high health care costs and lack of coverage compared to other industrialized nations.
Story cited here.
