Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., specified Tuesday how he would pay for his “Medicare for All”program, which critics have lambasted for its cost and impact on the federal budget.
While campaigning in New Hampshire, he responded to an audience member’s question about payment by saying he would likely raise payroll taxes on employers as well as income taxes on high-income earners.
“It would cost you and ordinary Americans a lot less than you are currently spending on average,” he said before explaining his payment method.
“What it will probably end up looking like is a payroll tax on employers, an increase in income tax in a progressive way for ordinary people — with a significant deductible for low-income people who pay nothing for it,” he said.
Hasan Piker says UK has barred him, trashes ‘unbelievable…power’ of pro-Israel groups
Pratt rallies supporters as Los Angeles mayoral race enters final stretch
Left-wing streamer blasts New Jersey governor over state police response at ICE facility protests
Scott Peterson’s longtime lawyer claims ‘new’ evidence could force courts to revisit his murder conviction
Hospitals Promised Less Expensive Care After Merging Into Behemoths – the Opposite Happened
Bad News Across the Country for Dems Desperately Trying to Redistrict Before the Midterms
NYPD commissioner ‘proudly’ leads Israel parade as grand marshal; Mamdani breaks tradition, avoids event
NASA Reveals Moon Base Plan With Construction Process Beginning as Early as 2029
Trump warns judge against sacrificing national security by blocking White House ballroom, drone base
The Civil War Never Really Ended, But an American Union Could Finally Help America Truly Heal
Why NATO’s defense spending imbalance lasted for decades
Trump expands Turkey ambassador’s diplomatic role, adding Iraq, Syria amid Middle East tensions
Does China Have The Upper Hand?
NHL Legend Hangs Himself: Report
Life’s About to Get More Complicated for Gun Buyers in Colorado
He also said his campaign purposefully didn’t put out a detailed account of his payment plan because it would “engender enormous debate.”
Sanders was just one of many progressive, 2020 candidates to advance “Medicare for All” and other policies, prompting more vigorous debate about socialism in the United States.
The proposal has received varying cost estimates from different organizations. According to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, one Medicare for All proposal from Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash. would cost about $28 trillion – $32 trillion over a decade.
The American Action Forum, a conservative think tank, estimated the Green New Deal’s provision for universal health care would cost $36 trillion, with $260,000 in cost per household.
Hasan Piker says UK has barred him, trashes ‘unbelievable…power’ of pro-Israel groups
Pratt rallies supporters as Los Angeles mayoral race enters final stretch
Left-wing streamer blasts New Jersey governor over state police response at ICE facility protests
Scott Peterson’s longtime lawyer claims ‘new’ evidence could force courts to revisit his murder conviction
Hospitals Promised Less Expensive Care After Merging Into Behemoths – the Opposite Happened
Bad News Across the Country for Dems Desperately Trying to Redistrict Before the Midterms
NYPD commissioner ‘proudly’ leads Israel parade as grand marshal; Mamdani breaks tradition, avoids event
NASA Reveals Moon Base Plan With Construction Process Beginning as Early as 2029
Trump warns judge against sacrificing national security by blocking White House ballroom, drone base
The Civil War Never Really Ended, But an American Union Could Finally Help America Truly Heal
Why NATO’s defense spending imbalance lasted for decades
Trump expands Turkey ambassador’s diplomatic role, adding Iraq, Syria amid Middle East tensions
Does China Have The Upper Hand?
NHL Legend Hangs Himself: Report
Life’s About to Get More Complicated for Gun Buyers in Colorado
Another study from the Mercatus Institute, typically perceived as leaning right on fiscal issues, similarly predicted in 2018 that the cost would reach $32 trillion in 10 years but forsaw a scenario in which the nation could actually save more than $2 trillion on health expenditures.
An alternative scenario, accounting for less effective cost controls, would result in more than $3 trillion in additional costs. Mercatus also claimed that its study’s author thought the assumptions showing cost-savings may be unreasonable.
When Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Seema Verma commented on the issue in April, she described the program as “the biggest threat to the American health care system.”
“What we’re talking about is stripping people of their private health insurance, forcing them into a government-run program,” she said. Her concerns echoed those of others who worried about the impact on existing health plans.
Hasan Piker says UK has barred him, trashes ‘unbelievable…power’ of pro-Israel groups
Pratt rallies supporters as Los Angeles mayoral race enters final stretch
Left-wing streamer blasts New Jersey governor over state police response at ICE facility protests
Scott Peterson’s longtime lawyer claims ‘new’ evidence could force courts to revisit his murder conviction
Hospitals Promised Less Expensive Care After Merging Into Behemoths – the Opposite Happened
Bad News Across the Country for Dems Desperately Trying to Redistrict Before the Midterms
NYPD commissioner ‘proudly’ leads Israel parade as grand marshal; Mamdani breaks tradition, avoids event
NASA Reveals Moon Base Plan With Construction Process Beginning as Early as 2029
Trump warns judge against sacrificing national security by blocking White House ballroom, drone base
The Civil War Never Really Ended, But an American Union Could Finally Help America Truly Heal
Why NATO’s defense spending imbalance lasted for decades
Trump expands Turkey ambassador’s diplomatic role, adding Iraq, Syria amid Middle East tensions
Does China Have The Upper Hand?
NHL Legend Hangs Himself: Report
Life’s About to Get More Complicated for Gun Buyers in Colorado
Sanders and others have championed universal health care as a human rights issue — citing the U.S.’s high health care costs and lack of coverage compared to other industrialized nations.
Story cited here.
