This morning, Democratic presidential candidate and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) tweeted out his support for efforts to unionize the video game industry. He did so in a fashion truly appropriate for the man—one that made it clear that he doesn’t always grasp basic economics:
The video game industry made $43 billion in revenue last year. The workers responsible for that profit deserve to collectively bargain as part of a union. I'm glad to see unions like @IATSE and the broader @GameWorkers movement organizing such workers. https://t.co/Ia5gMG2v0w
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) June 18, 2019
Elon Musk pours a staggering $10M into Kentucky Senate race, backing pro-Trump business outsider
Alert: Maryland Dems Introduce Bill to Ban All ICE Agents Hired Under Trump from Ever Serving in Law Enforcement Again
The Case for Jailing Don Lemon – How the DOJ Arrested, Tried, Convicted, and Punished Three J6 Journalists
Experts warn Minnesota school closures after ICE shooting will harm kids for ‘political points’
White House-backed GOP bill would revoke citizenship after Somali fraud scandal
Law Professor: Anti-ICE Governors Are Acting Like Anti-Civil Rights Segregationists
Google Rolls Back Disturbing Policy: They Emailed 13-Year-Olds Instructions on How to Remove Parental Controls
Trump asserts Ilhan Omar should be jailed or booted to Somalia
Portland DA cracks down on drug crimes as Seattle pulls back on enforcement
Florida triple murder of 3 tourists was ‘senseless,’ ‘random,’ sheriff says
‘Protecting Child Rapists and Killers’: ICE Lists Off Illegals They’ve Caught as Liberal Protests Rage On
California gubernatorial hopefuls have a Gavin Newsom problem
Lindsey Graham meets with Mossad director during trip to Israel
Unearthed Data Makes Pennsylvania’s Puberty Blocker Payouts Look Even Sketchier
Trump’s ‘first resort’ use of military has succeeded but it has its limits
In the tweet, Sanders confuses “revenue” with “profit.” This is not an insignificant mistake, but it’s one that is common in reporting about large American corporations. All too often, reporters talk about how much money a company takes in without offering any analysis of that company’s expenses. Amazon, for example, despite massive revenues has only recently begun making an actual profit. In the Time story that Sanders links to, writer Alana Semuels similarly fails to differentiate between revenue and profit when covering the efforts to organize.
It’s true that the game industry did bring in $42 billion in revenue last year from customers in the United States (and nearly $140 billion worldwide). But revenue is the money a company brings in before deducting its expenses, like, for example, workers’ wages. So, in reality, video game industry workers did get a cut of those billions. It’s only after such workers are paid (and other expenses are deducted) that we can talk about profit.
Sanders, of course, has a long history of failing to grasp the basics of market economics. He frequently sees marketplace choices as a threat, even as they open avenues and opportunities for our poorest citizens or provide all of us with ever improving mass entertainment.
Story cited here.
