This morning, Democratic presidential candidate and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) tweeted out his support for efforts to unionize the video game industry. He did so in a fashion truly appropriate for the man—one that made it clear that he doesn’t always grasp basic economics:
The video game industry made $43 billion in revenue last year. The workers responsible for that profit deserve to collectively bargain as part of a union. I'm glad to see unions like @IATSE and the broader @GameWorkers movement organizing such workers. https://t.co/Ia5gMG2v0w
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) June 18, 2019
California leaders mum on $1B high-speed rail detour aimed at preserving disgraced labor leader’s memorial
Research Team Reveals the Secret of Ancient Biblical Manuscript
After NASCAR’s Greg Biffle And Family Died, Police Think ‘Friends’ Stole from Them
State Department fires back at accusations of ‘empty planes’ rescuing Americans from conflict zones
Inside the coming battle over Virginia’s abortion ballot referendum
Iowa woman died following hernia repair after nurses dismissed painful post-surgery symptoms: lawsuit
Shooting during party at Oklahoma’s Arcadia Lake leaves at least 10 wounded, police say
Marco Rubio spotted behind DJ booth at family wedding as social media reacts to viral clip
Breaking: Rudy Giuliani in ‘Critical Condition’ at Florida Hospital
Rudy Giuliani hospitalized in critical but stable condition: ‘He’s fighting’
Man accused of biting infant during erratic dash through businesses before restaurant arrest
Breaking: After Attack of Cargo Vessel, Trump Directs US to Escort Foreign Ships Through Hormuz
Supreme Court Declines to Make Ruling in Case of ‘Socially Transitioned’ Florida Child
Company Orders Recall of Chocolate Sold Nationwide After Potentially Dangerous Ingredient Included
Latest Trump assassination attempt exposes ‘educated assassins’ moral crisis, university president says
In the tweet, Sanders confuses “revenue” with “profit.” This is not an insignificant mistake, but it’s one that is common in reporting about large American corporations. All too often, reporters talk about how much money a company takes in without offering any analysis of that company’s expenses. Amazon, for example, despite massive revenues has only recently begun making an actual profit. In the Time story that Sanders links to, writer Alana Semuels similarly fails to differentiate between revenue and profit when covering the efforts to organize.
It’s true that the game industry did bring in $42 billion in revenue last year from customers in the United States (and nearly $140 billion worldwide). But revenue is the money a company brings in before deducting its expenses, like, for example, workers’ wages. So, in reality, video game industry workers did get a cut of those billions. It’s only after such workers are paid (and other expenses are deducted) that we can talk about profit.
Sanders, of course, has a long history of failing to grasp the basics of market economics. He frequently sees marketplace choices as a threat, even as they open avenues and opportunities for our poorest citizens or provide all of us with ever improving mass entertainment.
Story cited here.
