This morning, Democratic presidential candidate and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) tweeted out his support for efforts to unionize the video game industry. He did so in a fashion truly appropriate for the man—one that made it clear that he doesn’t always grasp basic economics:
The video game industry made $43 billion in revenue last year. The workers responsible for that profit deserve to collectively bargain as part of a union. I'm glad to see unions like @IATSE and the broader @GameWorkers movement organizing such workers. https://t.co/Ia5gMG2v0w
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) June 18, 2019
Jack Smith Gives Telling Non-Answer When Asked the Key Trump Question During Deposition
Colorado Man Sentenced to Prison in Nationwide Child Sexploitation Scheme – Given 1 Year for Each of His 84 Victims
The road ahead for transit in New York City in 2026 includes fare hikes
5 big immigration changes taking effect across the US
China’s global aggression check: Taiwan tensions, military posturing and US response in 2025
Here are the top US cities Trump could target with National Guard deployments in 2026
Humiliating: CNN’s New Years Eve Show Descends Into Debauchery Yet Again
Even if Minnesota’s Somali-Owned Day Cares Aren’t Fraudulent, They Still Represent a Big Problem
Black Republican calls for total, permanent abolition of DEI: ‘I want to earn every opportunity on merit’
Homeless drifter accused of killing Barnes & Noble Christmas shopper blamed ‘fight or flight’ outburst: report
Repeat offender truck driver charged with bank robbery after claiming C-4 explosives, firing on officers: feds
Critics warn Minnesota legislation now taking effect is setting up the ‘next billion-dollar fraud’
Left-wing DC group coaches residents on how to ‘influence outcomes’ on a jury
New York City is about to test Mamdani’s progressive economic vision
The fall and rise of the Left’s premier dark money network
In the tweet, Sanders confuses “revenue” with “profit.” This is not an insignificant mistake, but it’s one that is common in reporting about large American corporations. All too often, reporters talk about how much money a company takes in without offering any analysis of that company’s expenses. Amazon, for example, despite massive revenues has only recently begun making an actual profit. In the Time story that Sanders links to, writer Alana Semuels similarly fails to differentiate between revenue and profit when covering the efforts to organize.
It’s true that the game industry did bring in $42 billion in revenue last year from customers in the United States (and nearly $140 billion worldwide). But revenue is the money a company brings in before deducting its expenses, like, for example, workers’ wages. So, in reality, video game industry workers did get a cut of those billions. It’s only after such workers are paid (and other expenses are deducted) that we can talk about profit.
Sanders, of course, has a long history of failing to grasp the basics of market economics. He frequently sees marketplace choices as a threat, even as they open avenues and opportunities for our poorest citizens or provide all of us with ever improving mass entertainment.
Story cited here.
