This morning, Democratic presidential candidate and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) tweeted out his support for efforts to unionize the video game industry. He did so in a fashion truly appropriate for the manāone that made it clear that he doesn’t always grasp basic economics:
The video game industry made $43 billion in revenue last year. The workers responsible for that profit deserve to collectively bargain as part of a union. I'm glad to see unions like @IATSE and the broader @GameWorkers movement organizing such workers. https://t.co/Ia5gMG2v0w
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) June 18, 2019
California neighborhood on alert after bat found near sidewalk tests positive for rabies virus
Charter bus driver who allegedly caused crash killing 5 in Virginia charged with involuntary manslaughter
Trump floats replacing 250th anniversary concert with massive MAGA rally after artists pull out
Senate candidate Graham Platner sent explicit texts to multiple women while married, wife says: report
Delaney Hall protests intensify as far-left activists, ICE supporters converge in New Jersey
Gov. Sherrill blames ICE, defends rioters after deploying troopers to quell violent mob
What The Left’s Colorado Climate Lawsuit Is Really All About
New Yorker Sentenced To 40 Years in Prison After Slaying 4 People on a Midnight Rampage
CBS News’ Bari Weiss Fired A ’60 Minutes’ Producer Citing ‘New Approach’
Who Was in Charge? Dems Owe Answers After Jill Biden Says She Thought Joe Was ‘Having a Stroke’ During Debate
Why Does the Media Care That Has-Beens Are Withdrawing From ‘Freedom 250’ DC Event?
Watch: Mysterious Strangers Pile Out of Sewer Manhole, Prompts Police Investigation
WATCH: Disgraceful UK Police Chief Apologizes for Letting Student Bleed Out Because He Was Accused of Being a Racist
Anti-ICE agitator charged with allegedly biting officers during Delaney Hall clashes
Will China Really Invade Taiwan In The Next Five Years?
In the tweet, Sanders confuses “revenue” with “profit.” This is not an insignificant mistake, but it’s one that is common in reporting about large American corporations. All too often, reporters talk about how much money a company takes in without offering any analysis of that company’s expenses. Amazon, for example, despite massive revenues has only recently begunĀ making an actual profit. In theĀ TimeĀ story that Sanders links to, writer Alana Semuels similarly fails to differentiate between revenue and profit when covering the efforts to organize.
It’s true that the game industry did bring in $42 billion in revenue last year from customers in the United States (and nearly $140 billionĀ worldwide). But revenue is the money a company brings in before deducting its expenses, like, for example,Ā workers’ wages. So, in reality, video game industry workersĀ didĀ get a cut of those billions. It’s only after such workers are paid (and other expenses are deducted) that we can talk about profit.
Sanders, of course, has a long history ofĀ failing to grasp the basicsĀ of market economics. He frequently sees marketplace choices as a threat, even as theyĀ open avenues and opportunitiesĀ for our poorest citizens or provide all of us withĀ ever improving mass entertainment.
Story cited here.









