This morning, Democratic presidential candidate and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) tweeted out his support for efforts to unionize the video game industry. He did so in a fashion truly appropriate for the man—one that made it clear that he doesn’t always grasp basic economics:
The video game industry made $43 billion in revenue last year. The workers responsible for that profit deserve to collectively bargain as part of a union. I'm glad to see unions like @IATSE and the broader @GameWorkers movement organizing such workers. https://t.co/Ia5gMG2v0w
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) June 18, 2019
How NASA May Have Just Pinpointed the Exact Day Jesus Died – April 3, 33 AD
Why repealing California’s EV mandate is dividing Senate Republicans
The red fitness watch challenge that’s keeping Capitol Hill active
‘Fork in the road’: Harmeet Dhillon calls on conservative lawyers to take on more civil rights cases
Grieving moms dig with ‘bare hands’ to unearth the dark truth behind their missing and murdered children
Detectives’ true crime podcast helps dig up breakthrough in case that haunted family: ‘drew audible gasp’
Florida man, 89, and his dog mauled to death by black bear in state’s first fatal attack
FBI Deputy Director Bongino: Illegal alien criminals and child predators are next in ongoing crackdown
Mike Rowe Compares Modern Dem Policy to Slavery: ‘No Different’
Democratic senator says there ‘needs to be space’ for Fetterman in party as Republicans come to his defense
Trump says ‘total reset negotiated’ with China during tariff talks in Geneva
Two injured after military vehicle crashes over highway retaining wall, plunges 30 feet onto road below
DHS says ‘arrests are still on the table’ after New Jersey House Dems caught on camera ‘storming’ ICE facility
ICE facility Democrats ‘stormed’ holds child rapists, murderers: officials
Inside the White House’s effort to pull India, Pakistan back from the brink of war
In the tweet, Sanders confuses “revenue” with “profit.” This is not an insignificant mistake, but it’s one that is common in reporting about large American corporations. All too often, reporters talk about how much money a company takes in without offering any analysis of that company’s expenses. Amazon, for example, despite massive revenues has only recently begun making an actual profit. In the Time story that Sanders links to, writer Alana Semuels similarly fails to differentiate between revenue and profit when covering the efforts to organize.
It’s true that the game industry did bring in $42 billion in revenue last year from customers in the United States (and nearly $140 billion worldwide). But revenue is the money a company brings in before deducting its expenses, like, for example, workers’ wages. So, in reality, video game industry workers did get a cut of those billions. It’s only after such workers are paid (and other expenses are deducted) that we can talk about profit.
Sanders, of course, has a long history of failing to grasp the basics of market economics. He frequently sees marketplace choices as a threat, even as they open avenues and opportunities for our poorest citizens or provide all of us with ever improving mass entertainment.
Story cited here.
