This morning, Democratic presidential candidate and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) tweeted out his support for efforts to unionize the video game industry. He did so in a fashion truly appropriate for the man—one that made it clear that he doesn’t always grasp basic economics:
The video game industry made $43 billion in revenue last year. The workers responsible for that profit deserve to collectively bargain as part of a union. I'm glad to see unions like @IATSE and the broader @GameWorkers movement organizing such workers. https://t.co/Ia5gMG2v0w
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) June 18, 2019
New York Democrat Pat Ryan pledges to refund AIPAC money. It could cost him $790,000
Fetterman Draws a Red Line on What Would Cause Him to Quit the Democratic Party
White House addresses growing parasite outbreak after more than 400 Americans sickened
More than a quarter-million noncitizens may be registered to vote in 4 key states, DHS alleges
Retiring GOP Sen. Tillis Vows to Block SAVE America Act Any Way He Can: ‘I Will Use Every Device’
Secret Service says ‘we have to’ remove swords from statues near White House
Details of Todd Blanche’s behind-the-scenes meeting with Angel Mom revealed after Capitol Hill testimony
FBI investigating after ICE headquarters in Phoenix riddled with gunfire
Kennedy Center tries to regain upper hand in renovation war: ‘Has institutional support’
Troy Jackson, an anti-corporate Maine Senate hopeful, touts endorsements from lobbyists
Intruder Storms ‘Today’ Show Set and Attacks Host
Trump says Josh Shapiro ‘doesn’t have what it takes’ as he moves to define him before 2028
Alleged Feeding Our Future fraud ringleader transferred from Somalia to face US charges
Insurance companies put on notice for stranding trans patients who want to reverse surgeries
GOP’s $95B defense package survives critical hurdle amid fiscal hawk revolt
In the tweet, Sanders confuses “revenue” with “profit.” This is not an insignificant mistake, but it’s one that is common in reporting about large American corporations. All too often, reporters talk about how much money a company takes in without offering any analysis of that company’s expenses. Amazon, for example, despite massive revenues has only recently begun making an actual profit. In the Time story that Sanders links to, writer Alana Semuels similarly fails to differentiate between revenue and profit when covering the efforts to organize.
It’s true that the game industry did bring in $42 billion in revenue last year from customers in the United States (and nearly $140 billion worldwide). But revenue is the money a company brings in before deducting its expenses, like, for example, workers’ wages. So, in reality, video game industry workers did get a cut of those billions. It’s only after such workers are paid (and other expenses are deducted) that we can talk about profit.
Sanders, of course, has a long history of failing to grasp the basics of market economics. He frequently sees marketplace choices as a threat, even as they open avenues and opportunities for our poorest citizens or provide all of us with ever improving mass entertainment.
Story cited here.
