This morning, Democratic presidential candidate and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) tweeted out his support for efforts to unionize the video game industry. He did so in a fashion truly appropriate for the man—one that made it clear that he doesn’t always grasp basic economics:
The video game industry made $43 billion in revenue last year. The workers responsible for that profit deserve to collectively bargain as part of a union. I'm glad to see unions like @IATSE and the broader @GameWorkers movement organizing such workers. https://t.co/Ia5gMG2v0w
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) June 18, 2019
Chicago teacher disappears, husband pleads for help finding her
Not Joking: Somalian President of UN Security Council Is Now Tied to ‘Home Health Agency’ Convicted of Medicaid Fraud in Ohio
Man drops engagement ring from 118-foot bridge during proposal, but there’s a happy ending
Watch: Trump’s DHS Delivers Horrible News to Ilhan Omar – She ‘Absolutely’ Can Be Denaturalized and They’re Investigating on ‘Massive’ Scale
Judge clears way for Minnesota welfare fraud ringleader to forfeit Porsche, millions held in accounts
Aldrich Ames, CIA officer who spied for Russia, dead at 84
Democrats walk Venezuela tightrope as some praise Maduro’s ouster
Highly Respected, Long Tenured NFL Head Coach Fired After Team Failed to Make the Playoffs
‘Squad’ Rep Ayanna Pressley’s ex-con husband slaps phone out of man’s hands as he tries to ask her a question
By Mamdani Aide’s Own Logic, Her Mom Apparently Wields ‘Weapon of White Supremacy’
Russia and China see danger and opportunity in the future of Trump’s ‘Donroe Doctrine’
NYC sex offender indicted for threatening to kill Jews, police and federal officials
James Comer to accuse Tim Walz of being ‘asleep at the wheel’ at fraud hearing
Wisconsin judge convicted of obstructing ICE resigns, vows to keep fighting case
Wyoming Supreme Court rules laws restricting abortion violate state constitution
In the tweet, Sanders confuses “revenue” with “profit.” This is not an insignificant mistake, but it’s one that is common in reporting about large American corporations. All too often, reporters talk about how much money a company takes in without offering any analysis of that company’s expenses. Amazon, for example, despite massive revenues has only recently begun making an actual profit. In the Time story that Sanders links to, writer Alana Semuels similarly fails to differentiate between revenue and profit when covering the efforts to organize.
It’s true that the game industry did bring in $42 billion in revenue last year from customers in the United States (and nearly $140 billion worldwide). But revenue is the money a company brings in before deducting its expenses, like, for example, workers’ wages. So, in reality, video game industry workers did get a cut of those billions. It’s only after such workers are paid (and other expenses are deducted) that we can talk about profit.
Sanders, of course, has a long history of failing to grasp the basics of market economics. He frequently sees marketplace choices as a threat, even as they open avenues and opportunities for our poorest citizens or provide all of us with ever improving mass entertainment.
Story cited here.
