This morning, Democratic presidential candidate and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) tweeted out his support for efforts to unionize the video game industry. He did so in a fashion truly appropriate for the man—one that made it clear that he doesn’t always grasp basic economics:
The video game industry made $43 billion in revenue last year. The workers responsible for that profit deserve to collectively bargain as part of a union. I'm glad to see unions like @IATSE and the broader @GameWorkers movement organizing such workers. https://t.co/Ia5gMG2v0w
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) June 18, 2019
Minnesota officials find car, hat belonging to assassin suspect Vance Boelter on highway in ‘fluid’ search
Trump says Israel and Iran ‘have to fight it out’ but believes deal is possible
Watch: ‘Harry Potter’ Actor Has Masterful Response After Reporter Tries to Bait Him on Series Creator
Gen. Flynn: Trump’s Great Test – Peace Through Strength or Endless Wars
FBI confirms capture of 2 of 4 illegal immigrants who escaped from Newark ICE facility
Ivanka Trump praises her father’s ‘unwavering determination, boundless vision’
Watch: Ex-NBA Star’s Contract Terminated After Ugly Brawl with Fans
Trump Officially Begins Phasing Out FEMA: ‘We’re Going to Give Out Less’
Doug Emhoff championed as a ‘wonderful dad’ by Harris and family
Not Even Hiding It: 148 Democrats Go Against Barring Non-Citizens from Voting
Padilla aghast that Noem did ‘not know’ him at press conference where he was detained
Dancing, Chanting Lawmakers Handed Historic Punishment: ‘Arrogant and Ignorant’
Sen Padilla insists he wasn’t disrupting Noem press conference: ‘I was simply asking a question’
Liberals Are So Desperate, They Can Only Ask 1 Question: ‘Where Is Barack Obama’
LA Mayor Bass downplays anti-ICE riots as limited to small part of city, says ‘zero comparison’ to 1992 unrest
In the tweet, Sanders confuses “revenue” with “profit.” This is not an insignificant mistake, but it’s one that is common in reporting about large American corporations. All too often, reporters talk about how much money a company takes in without offering any analysis of that company’s expenses. Amazon, for example, despite massive revenues has only recently begun making an actual profit. In the Time story that Sanders links to, writer Alana Semuels similarly fails to differentiate between revenue and profit when covering the efforts to organize.
It’s true that the game industry did bring in $42 billion in revenue last year from customers in the United States (and nearly $140 billion worldwide). But revenue is the money a company brings in before deducting its expenses, like, for example, workers’ wages. So, in reality, video game industry workers did get a cut of those billions. It’s only after such workers are paid (and other expenses are deducted) that we can talk about profit.
Sanders, of course, has a long history of failing to grasp the basics of market economics. He frequently sees marketplace choices as a threat, even as they open avenues and opportunities for our poorest citizens or provide all of us with ever improving mass entertainment.
Story cited here.
