This morning, Democratic presidential candidate and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) tweeted out his support for efforts to unionize the video game industry. He did so in a fashion truly appropriate for the man—one that made it clear that he doesn’t always grasp basic economics:
The video game industry made $43 billion in revenue last year. The workers responsible for that profit deserve to collectively bargain as part of a union. I'm glad to see unions like @IATSE and the broader @GameWorkers movement organizing such workers. https://t.co/Ia5gMG2v0w
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) June 18, 2019
GOING BROKE? The Washington Post Is Bleeding Money, With Losses Exceeding $100 Million in 2025
Poll: America’s Support for Israel Plunges as More Independents and Democrats Sympathize with Palestinians
US and Israel launch ‘preemptive’ attack against Iran
WATCH: Dem lawmaker makes surprising admission about border as others trash Trump’s SOTU ‘lies’
BREAKING REPORT: Israel Strikes Iran, US Involved
Richard Cox derails sex offender case, once again
North Carolina woman arrested nearly 50 years after baby found dead in trash bag at landfill
Biden accuses Trump of erasing history and squandering US leadership role on global stage: ‘Dark days’
ICE blasts Washington mayor over directive restricting immigration enforcement
Trump floats Ted Cruz for Supreme Court, jokes he’d get ‘100%’ bipartisan vote to ‘get him out of there’
Dem Washington House majority leader apologizes for being ‘impaired’ during budget hearing
Man accused of spraying anti-ICE graffiti at Oklahoma Capitol is registered child sex offender; charges filed
Hegseth bans military from attending Princeton, Columbia, other elite universities: ‘Wokeness and weakness’
Trump picks up Whataburger for Air Force One and jokes about being poisoned after Texas speech
Luigi Mangione escapes federal death penalty after federal prosecutors decline to appeal judge’s ruling
In the tweet, Sanders confuses “revenue” with “profit.” This is not an insignificant mistake, but it’s one that is common in reporting about large American corporations. All too often, reporters talk about how much money a company takes in without offering any analysis of that company’s expenses. Amazon, for example, despite massive revenues has only recently begun making an actual profit. In the Time story that Sanders links to, writer Alana Semuels similarly fails to differentiate between revenue and profit when covering the efforts to organize.
It’s true that the game industry did bring in $42 billion in revenue last year from customers in the United States (and nearly $140 billion worldwide). But revenue is the money a company brings in before deducting its expenses, like, for example, workers’ wages. So, in reality, video game industry workers did get a cut of those billions. It’s only after such workers are paid (and other expenses are deducted) that we can talk about profit.
Sanders, of course, has a long history of failing to grasp the basics of market economics. He frequently sees marketplace choices as a threat, even as they open avenues and opportunities for our poorest citizens or provide all of us with ever improving mass entertainment.
Story cited here.









