This morning, Democratic presidential candidate and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) tweeted out his support for efforts to unionize the video game industry. He did so in a fashion truly appropriate for the man—one that made it clear that he doesn’t always grasp basic economics:
The video game industry made $43 billion in revenue last year. The workers responsible for that profit deserve to collectively bargain as part of a union. I'm glad to see unions like @IATSE and the broader @GameWorkers movement organizing such workers. https://t.co/Ia5gMG2v0w
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) June 18, 2019
Trump calls on House Republicans to vote to release Epstein files: ‘We have nothing to hide’
Trump reveals Maduro ‘would like to talk’ as military options remain on the table for Venezuela
Marco Rubio says Nicolás Maduro’s Cartel de los Soles to be designated a terrorist organization
The Speaker’s Lobby: Happy New Year as shutdown showdown draws to a close
‘RFK Legacy’ Doc Film by Oliver Stone Draws Nexus Between JFK’s and RFK’s Assassinations
US forces kill 3 narco-terrorists in Eastern Pacific lethal strike operation targeting drug networks
How Harvard’s psychological experiments may have lit fuse on Unabomber: expert
Scott Jennings Shreds Dems’ Shutdown Blame Game with Just One Question
Chicago homeowners demand answers, speak out at ‘property tax bonfire’
Houston thug charged with murder after 8 arrests shows ‘revolving door’ failures: GOP lawmaker
Op-Ed: Leftists Hailing Recent ‘Victories’ Are Delusional
Massie says Trump investigating Epstein ‘hoax’ a ‘last-ditch effort’ to stop release of files
OJ Simpson estate accepts Fred Goldman’s $58M wrongful death claim nearly 30 years later: report
Trailer Park Near Military Base Linked to Chinese Communist Party: The Base Commander Had No Clue
Socialist Wins Mayor’s Race After Ballot Dumps Over a Week After the Election
In the tweet, Sanders confuses “revenue” with “profit.” This is not an insignificant mistake, but it’s one that is common in reporting about large American corporations. All too often, reporters talk about how much money a company takes in without offering any analysis of that company’s expenses. Amazon, for example, despite massive revenues has only recently begun making an actual profit. In the Time story that Sanders links to, writer Alana Semuels similarly fails to differentiate between revenue and profit when covering the efforts to organize.
It’s true that the game industry did bring in $42 billion in revenue last year from customers in the United States (and nearly $140 billion worldwide). But revenue is the money a company brings in before deducting its expenses, like, for example, workers’ wages. So, in reality, video game industry workers did get a cut of those billions. It’s only after such workers are paid (and other expenses are deducted) that we can talk about profit.
Sanders, of course, has a long history of failing to grasp the basics of market economics. He frequently sees marketplace choices as a threat, even as they open avenues and opportunities for our poorest citizens or provide all of us with ever improving mass entertainment.
Story cited here.









