This morning, Democratic presidential candidate and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) tweeted out his support for efforts to unionize the video game industry. He did so in a fashion truly appropriate for the man—one that made it clear that he doesn’t always grasp basic economics:
The video game industry made $43 billion in revenue last year. The workers responsible for that profit deserve to collectively bargain as part of a union. I'm glad to see unions like @IATSE and the broader @GameWorkers movement organizing such workers. https://t.co/Ia5gMG2v0w
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) June 18, 2019
BREAKING: Robert Mueller, Who Investigated Russian Collusion, Dies at 81
Judge Lays Into Progressive Prosecutors Before Slapping Violent Teen With Tough Sentence
Trump threatens to deploy ICE agents to airports amid funding fight, vows arrests of illegal aliens
Child safety nonprofit founded by Tom Steyer’s brother has multiple Epstein ties: ‘No concerns’
Chief Justice Roberts Sides With Boasberg Against Trump – This as Boasberg Continues One Man Campaign to Stop an Elected President
Popular HBO Show Introduces Villainous ICE Agents, Showrunner Wanted to Push ‘Harder’
Iran funding emerges as key test for Johnson’s razor-thin House majority
Warren warned Hegseth’s tattoo made him a potential ‘threat’ — now she backs candidate with Nazi-linked ink
Trump’s Energy Dominance Has Protected Americans from the Worst Effects of the Iran Conflict
Kentucky Cheerleader Who Allegedly Let Newborn Suffocate Hit With Charges
Prosecutors stopped Suzanne Morphew’s cremation at the last minute, and say Barry Morphew ordered it: docs
Career criminal accused of breaking into home, climbing into bed with child as family slept
GOP senator’s gambit exposes false Dem claims about supporting voter ID
Thune pleads with voters for patience on rising gas prices amid Iran war
Soros-backed Austin DA faces resignation calls over alleged ‘secret meetings’ in case against cop
In the tweet, Sanders confuses “revenue” with “profit.” This is not an insignificant mistake, but it’s one that is common in reporting about large American corporations. All too often, reporters talk about how much money a company takes in without offering any analysis of that company’s expenses. Amazon, for example, despite massive revenues has only recently begun making an actual profit. In the Time story that Sanders links to, writer Alana Semuels similarly fails to differentiate between revenue and profit when covering the efforts to organize.
It’s true that the game industry did bring in $42 billion in revenue last year from customers in the United States (and nearly $140 billion worldwide). But revenue is the money a company brings in before deducting its expenses, like, for example, workers’ wages. So, in reality, video game industry workers did get a cut of those billions. It’s only after such workers are paid (and other expenses are deducted) that we can talk about profit.
Sanders, of course, has a long history of failing to grasp the basics of market economics. He frequently sees marketplace choices as a threat, even as they open avenues and opportunities for our poorest citizens or provide all of us with ever improving mass entertainment.
Story cited here.
