This morning, Democratic presidential candidate and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) tweeted out his support for efforts to unionize the video game industry. He did so in a fashion truly appropriate for the man—one that made it clear that he doesn’t always grasp basic economics:
The video game industry made $43 billion in revenue last year. The workers responsible for that profit deserve to collectively bargain as part of a union. I'm glad to see unions like @IATSE and the broader @GameWorkers movement organizing such workers. https://t.co/Ia5gMG2v0w
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) June 18, 2019
US asks Lebanon to return Israeli bomb to prevent capture by Russia or China
Trump peace plan passes in Knesset despite boycott over mention of Palestinian statehood
‘Winter Vomiting Disease’ Is Spreading Rapidly in the US, CDC Data Shows
More Immigration Judges’ Heads Roll as Trump Continues Clearing Way for Deportations – At Least 100 Judges off the Bench Since January
Trump admin debuts ‘Fentanyl Free America’ plan as DEA touts impact of Caribbean boat strikes
Bipartisan deal on Obamacare subsidies fades as Republicans push HSA plan
Man charged with attacking NYU student has 16 prior arrests
California Christian college student founds pro-life club after school rejects Students for Life chapter
Patriots Star Calls Attention to Persecuted Christians with Special Cleats: ‘Will You Stand with Them?’
Let’s Roll, Mr. President: ICE Surging Into New Target and the Somalis Are Scared
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to special election results for Tennessee’s 7th Congressional District
DOJ busts ‘Greggy’s Cult’ child exploitation network that allegedly coerced kids into self-harm
Late Breaking: Trump-Endorsed Van Epps Defeats Anti-Police Democrat in TN House Race
Texas Tech restricts teaching of race and gender, faculty could be disciplined for violating rule
DOJ sues six states for refusing to turn over voter registration rolls, warns ‘open defiance’ of federal law
In the tweet, Sanders confuses “revenue” with “profit.” This is not an insignificant mistake, but it’s one that is common in reporting about large American corporations. All too often, reporters talk about how much money a company takes in without offering any analysis of that company’s expenses. Amazon, for example, despite massive revenues has only recently begun making an actual profit. In the Time story that Sanders links to, writer Alana Semuels similarly fails to differentiate between revenue and profit when covering the efforts to organize.
It’s true that the game industry did bring in $42 billion in revenue last year from customers in the United States (and nearly $140 billion worldwide). But revenue is the money a company brings in before deducting its expenses, like, for example, workers’ wages. So, in reality, video game industry workers did get a cut of those billions. It’s only after such workers are paid (and other expenses are deducted) that we can talk about profit.
Sanders, of course, has a long history of failing to grasp the basics of market economics. He frequently sees marketplace choices as a threat, even as they open avenues and opportunities for our poorest citizens or provide all of us with ever improving mass entertainment.
Story cited here.
