This morning, Democratic presidential candidate and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) tweeted out his support for efforts to unionize the video game industry. He did so in a fashion truly appropriate for the man—one that made it clear that he doesn’t always grasp basic economics:
The video game industry made $43 billion in revenue last year. The workers responsible for that profit deserve to collectively bargain as part of a union. I'm glad to see unions like @IATSE and the broader @GameWorkers movement organizing such workers. https://t.co/Ia5gMG2v0w
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) June 18, 2019
Rubio claims ‘tremendous amount of progress’ in Ukraine peace talks following Geneva meeting
Kristi Noem unveils $1B TSA modernization plan, awards $10K bonuses to workers who served during shutdown
Duffy identifies Chicago train victim as 26-year-old Bethany MaGee while blasting city’s ‘carelessness’
DOGE closes eight months early, but principles remain ‘alive and well’
Trump claims GOP has ‘never been so united,’ calls Greene and other Republicans ‘lowlifes’
British teen says urine, glue chucked at him while trying to carry on Charlie Kirk’s legacy in UK
Portion of Catholic students kidnapped in Nigeria escape as country grapples with anti-Christian violence
Scottish Lawmakers Refuse to Ban Shocking ‘Assisted Suicides’
Kennedy cousin tied to Martha Moxley case breaks silence 50 years later as murder remains unsolved
Former TV anchor heads to same prison as Ghislaine Maxwell after $63M COVID fraud conviction
Divine Judgment? Iran Experiencing Record Drought, Tehran Faces Evacuation
X’s new location feature exposes apparent fraudster accounts posing as Americans, Gaza journalists
‘Meta Never Told Parents…’: Court Docs Claim Meta Failed to Prevent Abuse of Minors
Trump’s wild Mamdani flip — the insults that came before the love fest
Climate Change Concern Plummets In Big Cities, Poll Finds
In the tweet, Sanders confuses “revenue” with “profit.” This is not an insignificant mistake, but it’s one that is common in reporting about large American corporations. All too often, reporters talk about how much money a company takes in without offering any analysis of that company’s expenses. Amazon, for example, despite massive revenues has only recently begun making an actual profit. In the Time story that Sanders links to, writer Alana Semuels similarly fails to differentiate between revenue and profit when covering the efforts to organize.
It’s true that the game industry did bring in $42 billion in revenue last year from customers in the United States (and nearly $140 billion worldwide). But revenue is the money a company brings in before deducting its expenses, like, for example, workers’ wages. So, in reality, video game industry workers did get a cut of those billions. It’s only after such workers are paid (and other expenses are deducted) that we can talk about profit.
Sanders, of course, has a long history of failing to grasp the basics of market economics. He frequently sees marketplace choices as a threat, even as they open avenues and opportunities for our poorest citizens or provide all of us with ever improving mass entertainment.
Story cited here.
