This morning, Democratic presidential candidate and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) tweeted out his support for efforts to unionize the video game industry. He did so in a fashion truly appropriate for the man—one that made it clear that he doesn’t always grasp basic economics:
The video game industry made $43 billion in revenue last year. The workers responsible for that profit deserve to collectively bargain as part of a union. I'm glad to see unions like @IATSE and the broader @GameWorkers movement organizing such workers. https://t.co/Ia5gMG2v0w
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) June 18, 2019
Supreme Court weighs Mexico’s challenge against US gunmakers
Riley Gaines, DOGE, Silk Road: Who’s in the audience for Trump speech to Congress?
Political strategists lay out how Trump should kick off his 4-year term
Federal agencies to review Columbia University’s contracts, grants after ‘failure’ to protect Jewish students
Vance urges Zelensky to change tune on ceasefire: Trump the ‘only game in town’
NYC gives migrants more ways to obtain city ID making it easier for them to get benefits, housing: report
DOGE initial findings on Defense Department DEI spending could save $80M, agency says
AG Pam Bondi says FBI delivered ‘truckload’ of Epstein files after she put out hard deadline
Head of FBI New York office reveals he was forced to retire
McMahon on Day 1 launches ‘final mission’ to send education back to the states
Bill Nye claims Elon Musk wants to replace NOAA weather satellites with Starlink
Man who wore diamond watch to Lakers game sues arena, claims he was assaulted and robbed in restroom
Top official at FBI New York Field Office forced to retire
Trump Erupts After Zelenskyy Makes ‘The Worst Statement That Could Have Been Made’ Days After Oval Office Disaster
Van Hollen regrets voting for Secretary Rubio
In the tweet, Sanders confuses “revenue” with “profit.” This is not an insignificant mistake, but it’s one that is common in reporting about large American corporations. All too often, reporters talk about how much money a company takes in without offering any analysis of that company’s expenses. Amazon, for example, despite massive revenues has only recently begun making an actual profit. In the Time story that Sanders links to, writer Alana Semuels similarly fails to differentiate between revenue and profit when covering the efforts to organize.
It’s true that the game industry did bring in $42 billion in revenue last year from customers in the United States (and nearly $140 billion worldwide). But revenue is the money a company brings in before deducting its expenses, like, for example, workers’ wages. So, in reality, video game industry workers did get a cut of those billions. It’s only after such workers are paid (and other expenses are deducted) that we can talk about profit.
Sanders, of course, has a long history of failing to grasp the basics of market economics. He frequently sees marketplace choices as a threat, even as they open avenues and opportunities for our poorest citizens or provide all of us with ever improving mass entertainment.
Story cited here.
