This morning, Democratic presidential candidate and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) tweeted out his support for efforts to unionize the video game industry. He did so in a fashion truly appropriate for the man—one that made it clear that he doesn’t always grasp basic economics:
The video game industry made $43 billion in revenue last year. The workers responsible for that profit deserve to collectively bargain as part of a union. I'm glad to see unions like @IATSE and the broader @GameWorkers movement organizing such workers. https://t.co/Ia5gMG2v0w
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) June 18, 2019
Man Arrested After Attack on School Bus Seriously Injures 8-Year-Old Girl
Iran’s crown prince calls for renewed nationwide protests despite killings: ‘This is a war’
Brooks Koepka Returns to PGA Tour, Opening the Door for Other LIV Stars – But There’s an $85 Million Catch
Fox News Politics Newsletter: Trump declares himself Venezuela’s ‘acting president’
Trump announces ‘final’ 25% tariff on countries doing business with Iran regime
Former Navy SEAL convicted for trying to harm police with explosives during California ‘No Kings’ protests
Celebrities Wear Anti-ICE Pins at Golden Globes in Tribute to Renee Good
House Democrats ask judge to block Noem’s revived ICE visit rule, say DHS defied court order
Conservative legal group targets CFPB rule mandating race, sex data in home loans
Trump Says the Military ‘Is Looking at Some Strong Options’ on Iran
DOJ charges illegal immigrant with Tren de Aragua ties after Border Patrol shooting in Portland
Riley Gaines says her show’s rebrand will ‘broaden’ its scope of discussions
Powell reveals what it would take to step down from the Fed as pressure mounts
Trump pledges to uncover leftist groups countering ICE
Minneapolis Police Finally Do Their Jobs: 30 ICE Protesters Detained Already
In the tweet, Sanders confuses “revenue” with “profit.” This is not an insignificant mistake, but it’s one that is common in reporting about large American corporations. All too often, reporters talk about how much money a company takes in without offering any analysis of that company’s expenses. Amazon, for example, despite massive revenues has only recently begun making an actual profit. In the Time story that Sanders links to, writer Alana Semuels similarly fails to differentiate between revenue and profit when covering the efforts to organize.
It’s true that the game industry did bring in $42 billion in revenue last year from customers in the United States (and nearly $140 billion worldwide). But revenue is the money a company brings in before deducting its expenses, like, for example, workers’ wages. So, in reality, video game industry workers did get a cut of those billions. It’s only after such workers are paid (and other expenses are deducted) that we can talk about profit.
Sanders, of course, has a long history of failing to grasp the basics of market economics. He frequently sees marketplace choices as a threat, even as they open avenues and opportunities for our poorest citizens or provide all of us with ever improving mass entertainment.
Story cited here.









