This morning, Democratic presidential candidate and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) tweeted out his support for efforts to unionize the video game industry. He did so in a fashion truly appropriate for the man—one that made it clear that he doesn’t always grasp basic economics:
The video game industry made $43 billion in revenue last year. The workers responsible for that profit deserve to collectively bargain as part of a union. I'm glad to see unions like @IATSE and the broader @GameWorkers movement organizing such workers. https://t.co/Ia5gMG2v0w
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) June 18, 2019
Breaking: NASA, Navy Personnel Rush to Recover Artemis II Astronauts After Pacific Ocean Landing
Sen Tim Sheehy makes emergency landing after in-flight engine failure
Pelosi, California Dems slam Swalwell over bombshell sexual assault allegations: ‘Indefensible’
Washington Post Journalist Pleads Guilty in Child Porn Case
Planned Parenthood Lost More Money Than It Made as Taxpayer Funding, Abortions Increased
Wes Moore preemptively unloads on Baltimore Sun ahead of expose, as spox beefs with ‘right wing’ ownership
On Nato, It’s Time to Take the Maverick from ‘Top Gun’ Approach: ‘Don’t Think, Just Do’
Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: Antifa-tied group’s plan for chaos, school probe over transgender policy
Fox News True Crime Newsletter: Bahamas missing woman mystery, Athena Strand bodycam, Gilgo Beach guilty plea
Trump unveils new renderings for arch with ‘one nation under God’ inscription
Kamala Harris ‘might’ run for president in 2028, but black voters are skeptical of the idea
Kamala Harris Gives the Surest Sign Yet She’s Running in 2028 with Al Sharpton Event Speech
Teens suspected of murdering congressional intern linked by DNA on shell casings, prosecutors say
LATE BREAKING: Trump Issues Shockingly Graphic Post Targeting Haitian Illegal Accused of Murdering Mother of 2
Bessent, Powell summon Wall Street CEOs for emergency meeting over Anthropic AI risks amid Pentagon dispute
In the tweet, Sanders confuses “revenue” with “profit.” This is not an insignificant mistake, but it’s one that is common in reporting about large American corporations. All too often, reporters talk about how much money a company takes in without offering any analysis of that company’s expenses. Amazon, for example, despite massive revenues has only recently begun making an actual profit. In the Time story that Sanders links to, writer Alana Semuels similarly fails to differentiate between revenue and profit when covering the efforts to organize.
It’s true that the game industry did bring in $42 billion in revenue last year from customers in the United States (and nearly $140 billion worldwide). But revenue is the money a company brings in before deducting its expenses, like, for example, workers’ wages. So, in reality, video game industry workers did get a cut of those billions. It’s only after such workers are paid (and other expenses are deducted) that we can talk about profit.
Sanders, of course, has a long history of failing to grasp the basics of market economics. He frequently sees marketplace choices as a threat, even as they open avenues and opportunities for our poorest citizens or provide all of us with ever improving mass entertainment.
Story cited here.
