AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

First-Graders Leap Into Action and Save Their Teacher from Choking in Virginia Classroom

GOP Rep Goes Nuclear After Democrat Cuts Him Off Mid-Sentence: ‘You Were That Rude’

Widespread Obamacare Fraud: Phony SSNs Had a 100% Success Rate for Getting Coverage, Investigation Finds

How Is This Not Racist? Ex-MSNBC Host Trashes Minorities for Working with ICE to Catch Criminals

Florida teens in custody after 14-year-old girl found shot to death, burnt: sheriff

Alaska school district erases Veterans Day from official calendar: ‘Absolutely unacceptable’

Tom Homan Nukes Heckler Who Calls Him Traitor: ‘Grow A Backbone, Put a Kevlar Vest and a Gun on’

Public School Students Allowed to Skip Classes in Chicago if They ‘Fear’ ICE

Congress faces holiday crunch as health care fix collides with shrinking calendar

Republicans divided over whether to salvage Obamacare — or replace it — ahead of subsidy deadline

GOP stands firm in ‘blue slip’ battle with Trump despite prosecutor setbacks

Idaho bar owner faces death threats after viral promo offering free beer for assisting ICE

Judge rules evidence linked to James Comey’s ally is off limits to DOJ

EXCLUSIVE: Trump-led Kennedy Center nearly doubles fundraising from Biden era, smashing record with $23M haul

Hegseth hints at major defense spending hike, reveals new details on Trump’s anti-narco-terrorism operations

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”