AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Kash Patel files $250 million defamation lawsuit against the Atlantic over drinking allegations

Hawaii tourist charged with attempted murder, accused of stabbing veteran boat captain on snorkel tour

Law Professor: Blue States Taxing Fleeing Residents Are Like ‘Deranged Ex-Spouse In Denial’

Blue City Paradise: NYC Thugs Steal Elderly Women’s Car, Hit 72-Year-Old With Walker as They Make Their Getaway

Nancy Guthrie sheriff under pressure as petition demands access for United Cajun Navy

US military announces another deadly strike against ‘narco-terrorists’

DOJ demands 865K Detroit ballots, threatening possible legal action

GOP Senate hopeful Michele Tafoya accuses Walz, Ellison of ignoring Minnesota fraud scheme

NYPD investigating ‘reckless’ drag racing street takeover in Queens

Republicans Cline and Presler rally against Virginia redistricting vote

Pennsylvania man accused of stealing over 100 sets of human remains appears in court in ‘horror movie’ case

Survey finds nearly one-third of Long Island residents say Jews should ‘move on’ from the Holocaust

DOJ Reportedly Appealing Ruling That Limits Feds’ Ability to Use Notorious Spy Tool

Homeowner Uses Shovel to Defend His Pregnant Wife and Child from Would-Be Intruder

House Hearing Witnesses Reveal How Hardworking Families Pay Higher Taxes

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”