AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Blanche rolls out fraud crackdown in first remarks since Bondi ouster

Trump Iran threat sparks calls for his ouster, but one Dem says effort ‘not realistic’

Report: ‘Positive’ Development in US-Iran Talks as Clock Ticks Toward Deadline

Trump’s threat to end Iranian ‘civilization’ sparks uproar on Capitol Hill

Trump DOJ Says Not So Fast as Mamdani Announces ‘Racial Equity Plan’

Byron Allen’s Comics Unleashed to replace Stephen Colbert on CBS next month

Trump calls into Vance-Orban Hungary event: ‘My kind of people’

Ex-Trump ally Marjorie Taylor Greene joins left-wing calls for the 25th amendment as Iran deadline nears

DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin Floats New Tactic for Cracking Down on Sanctuary Cities

MTG cites 25th Amendment as she calls out Trump over Iran

Daughter of missing American woman in Bahamas says there were ‘prior issues,’ calls for full investigation

Aaron Rupar, Trump-Obsessed Lib Clip Farmer, Gets Glowing Profile From One of UK’s Most Prestigious Papers

Indianapolis official’s home attacked after vote in favor of controversial data center

Trump admin terminates some agreements with districts, college on transgender students

Probe to snare Iran rescue leaker ‘underway’ as Trump threatens jail for imperiling arduous operation

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”