AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Lindsey Graham’s final act reverberates in Senate as sister is urged to “keep pedaling”

Karoline Leavitt to hold first press briefing since return from maternity leave

Louisiana man accused of killing deputy US marshal faces possible death penalty

Trump says Iran released American woman held since 2024 in ‘gesture of goodwill’

Tim Walz offers strange defense for pardoning convicted child rapist Trump administration deported

Nevada Lt Gov: Elon Musk could make space tourism state’s next big industry

Bloodhound K-9 unit helps bring Georgia manhunt to end with arrest of suspect accused of shooting woman

EXCLUSIVE: Pence pushes to rename bill for Lindsey Graham, recalls final talk: ‘Bring Putin to the table’

Trump says ‘proud American veterans’ will replace illegal immigrant truck drivers

Former Marine running for Congress says Trump is the Antichrist and ‘must be killed’ in shocking video

Tim Scott floats Lindsey Graham’s sister as permanent successor

GLAAD Complains Over New Study Showing Movies Have Become Less Gay: ‘Our Stories are Disappearing’

Drunk wrong-way driver killed Mass. trooper after 9 drinks at bar, DA report says

Retired math professor charged after wife, an airline meteorologist, found shot dead: cops

House Democrats fracture badly over Massie amendment to cut $3.3B in US aid to Israel

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”