AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

House narrowly backs allowing troops, Pentagon workers to carry personal guns on military bases

Progressive wave crashes in Sun Belt battleground as moderate holds his seat

House GOP votes to punt government shutdown battle to after November midterms

Woman’s remains identified by DNA in Virginia, exposing second alleged murder linked to same 4 suspects

Mamdani goes back on campaign promise, says NYC can’t arrest Netanyahu

Watch: Leftist Witness Confused by Jasmine Crockett’s Wild ‘Racism’ Claim About the World Cup Final

Alleged ‘mime’ stalker stripped to underwear, covered himself in cooking oil: officials

Watch: Dog Moves Like Lightning to Protect Her Boy from Charging Black Bear and Gets the Job Done

David Hogg Rips DNC’s Campaign Arm as ‘Evil’ and Says Top Party Fundraisers ‘Pick Terrible Candidates’

Slack messages released by Rand Paul appear to show authors of key COVID-19 origin paper held private doubts

WATCH: Smithsonian director pressed on woke exhibits: ‘Is Mickey Mouse racist?’

Peter Navarro contempt of Congress conviction upheld by appeals court

FBI Director Kash Patel to Make Rare Trip to Russia: Report

Todd Blanche faces lingering GOP holdouts for attorney general post over ‘anti-weaponization fund’

Zelensky sacks Ukrainian Commander in Chief Syrsky in major military shake-up

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”