AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

The Democratic socialists are no longer on the fringe

BREAKING: Protester Sets Himself on Fire Outside UN Building in NYC

Massachusetts city imposes curfew ahead of historic World Cup match

Fitness influencer pleads guilty in violent gym attack after beating man with weightlifting belt

One Day After Cancelling July 4 Fireworks, Buffalo, NY, Celebrates Somali Independence Day

‘Young Washington’ Delivers Revolutionary Hit for Angel Studios Honoring America’s 250th Birthday

Enter the Downwardly Mobile Anti-Hero Politicians

Ex-Obama advisor mocked after questioning Chicago’s response to unconscious man: ‘Own a mirror?’

Secret Service missed ‘multiple opportunities’ to prevent Trump assassination attempt: watchdog

Watch: Young Americans Turn National Mall Into Wild Celebration of Patriotism as US Scores Big World Cup Win

Before 1776: Rediscovering America’s first chapter at Jamestown

Watch: Pete Hegseth Skewers ‘Blinded by Ideology’ Protesters Who Interrupted Moment of Silence for Fallen Soldier

Sanctuary county refused 615 ICE transfer requests, turned over just 11 illegal immigrants, records show

Secret Service debuts new badge for all personnel: ‘Represents unity’

Thunderbirds to race cars: Inside Horsepower of America at the Great American State Fair

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”