AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

BTK killer Dennis Rader’s daughter Kerri Rawson hit with domestic violence injunction: report

Murdered 9-year-old begged not to go on trip with dad months before he allegedly killed her, mom testifies

Thune soft-pedals adding Trump’s request for debt limit curveball to GOP budget bill

Breaking: Iran Launches Missiles at US Base in Surprise Attack – US Forces Downed Every Single One

New Maine law limits police cooperation with federal immigration officials

GOP governor survives challenge from Bitcoin evangelist in gubernatorial runoff

A 16-Year-Old Lifeguard’s ‘Heroic’ Rescue Earns Him a Trip to the White House After Trump Sees Footage

Daughter of late House Dem forced into runoff after falling short in special election

Mamdani Slammed for ‘Reckless and Foolish’ Doxxing of Thousands of Wealthy New Yorkers

White House Issues Update After High-Stakes Meetings with Netanyahu and Zelenskyy

Putin, Russia put on notice as Senate takes crucial step to grind down the Kremlin’s war machine

Experts scorch Mamdani’s grocery plan as an ‘illusion’ that will have taxpayers footing the bill

Iran has struck 14 Middle Eastern nations. Here’s what they have at stake in the war

Leading economist warns of rise of ‘Gen Z affordability socialism’

Pentagon to Honor Lindsey Graham by Renaming Military Base

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”