AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Two arrested after US Park Police officer shot in apparent DC ambush: report

Judge grants $1 murder bond for Georgia woman accused of using pills to induce second-trimester abortion

Florida GOP gubernatorial candidate calls for sweeping federal limits on Muslim immigration

NJ Gov. Sherrill attends mosque led by Imam once accused of Hamas ties in deportation case

Ballot box upset: Democrats flip Florida legislative seat in Trump’s stomping ground

Pritzker’s glowing review of lakefront resurfaces after college student killed by illegal alien nearby

President Trump Invokes Jesus While Pushing Senate to Pass the SAVE America Act

Oklahoma Governor Names Energy Executive to Fill DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin’s Senate Seat

Angel mom, GOP blame Spanberger after illegal immigrant with 30 arrests charged in killing

Alert: Lawmaker Cites TSA Report Confirming Cash Leaving Minneapolis Airport Approached $1 Billion by 2025

Senate confirms DOJ fraud chief as Minnesota daycare scandal draws national scrutiny

BREAKING: Pentagon Reportedly Preparing to Send 3,000 Airborne Troops to Middle East

Op-Ed: Democrats Are Fighting for Ballot Baloney

Aid ships dock in Cuba as country faces economic and energy crisis

NTSB flags ‘conflicting information’ in LaGuardia tower, unclear who handled ground-control duties

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”