AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Ax-wielding suspect subdued by teen military recruit’s MMA takedown in car wash clash caught on video

‘Unprecedented’ agreement releases emergency oil reserves as gas prices spark concerns

House Oversight Committee demands depositions from Bondi and Lutnick in Epstein probe

Dem lawmaker disputes police bodycam amid reports he said he was above the law: ‘On top’ or ‘on time’

The ‘Worst Mayor in America’ Is Attempting a Political Comeback — With a New Party

Kamala Harris Cancels Multiple Book Tour Stops Amid Controversy

Hillary Clinton caught on video stepping back after pushy former president nudges her at busy NYC intersection

Shipping disruptions spread beyond oil: Helium, sulfur, and semiconductors

3 brothers of Iraqi descent arrested in Oslo for allegedly ‘terror bombing’ of US Embassy

Republican Sen. John Cornyn Calls on GOP to Change Filibuster and Pass SAVE Act as He Prepares for Primary Runoff Against Ken Paxton

Minnesota human services officials skip fraud hearing as Walz promises reform

‘You can cry about it’: Tempers flare in Senate as DHS shutdown debate erupts, stalemate digs deeper

Conquered: NYC Firefighters Angry After Bosses, Muslim Firefighters Make Startling Change to 9/11 Memorial Area for Ramadan

Why Republican Steve Hilton increasing his lead in the California polls could be beneficial for Democrats

Wife of former Gov Terry McAuliffe jumps into crowded Dem congressional primary race

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”