AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Tech Titan Blasted for Using AI to Come up With 3 Things That Makes Her Daughter Special on Her 10th Birthday

Wyoming mom reported missing after not picking up kids; sister, police search for answers

Watch: YouTuber Separates Conjoined Turtle Twins, Ends with ‘Heartbreaking’ Result

Cops raid West Virginia frat houses in hazing probe as growing crackdown should be ‘wake-up call’: expert

Americans forced to change clocks again as Senate stalls Trump-backed daylight saving time bill

Everything to know about House and Senate control, ballot measures and 2026 Election Day poll closing

Future of MAHA and anti-abortion policy hinges on Roger Marshall’s election chances

‘Free Instacart for Welfare Queens’: California Begins Sending Out Luxury Food Boxes at Taxpayers’ Expense

California Mayor Allegedly Followed, Harassed, Blocked Car of Random Man She Thought Was ICE

Chuck Klosterman’s ‘Rock*’ is an exercise in fantastical pointlessness

Skilled trades now offer direct path to six-figure pay without college debt thanks to emerging tech industry

A look inside the Somali mall where Omar reappeared after DC raid raises more failed assimilation concerns

NYC woman critically injured after being stabbed multiple times while jogging along Brooklyn waterfront

Democrats’ self-inflicted wounds threaten high-stakes Michigan Senate race

Tough Time Finding an Affordable Car? Thank Obama’s Destruction of 680k Working Vehicles in 2009

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”