AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Outgoing Cracker Barrel CEO to Receive Millions in Severance Pay

Conservatives Clash Over Caitlin Clark’s Response to Question About Trans Athletes

Democratic socialist Francesca Hong has former child star, OnlyFans model in senior campaign role: report

Airbnb’s $750,000 to Karen Bass fuels pay-to-play claims over LA rental policy

Schumer said ‘Democrats support voter ID’ — then every Senate Democrat voted against GOP bill

Schumer caves, hands Republicans shutdown win after months of uncertainty

SEE IT: Dem senators rally behind El-Sayed but duck questions on progressive agenda

Two men accused of posing as federal agents arrested after allegedly targeting 85-year-old in $200K gold scam

Senate GOP punts party-line budget fight until after August recess

Trump urges Jeanine Pirro to revisit dropped Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool vandalism case

More than 50 bodies found decomposing inside Chicago funeral home after neighbors complained of ‘stench’

Fed-Up NYC Homeowners Take to Court to Fight Back Against Mamdani’s New Tax ‘Debacle’

Former Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall has security clearance revoked over Air Force One disclosure

Trump-Backed Rep. Andy Ogles Loses Primary After Green Energy Group Spent Big to Unseat Him

Chilling new video shows armed citizens, off-duty trooper confront In-N-Out gunman during deadly rampage

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”