AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Dem socialist running for Wisconsin governor pushed ‘abolishing the police’

From rally gunfire to White House shooting, threats against President Trump continue to mount

Ice Cream Recall Affects Residents of 17 States

This European Commentator Was Banned from Britain for Wrongthink

These Christian Girls from Pakistan Were Forced Into Marriage by Muslims

White House blasts Cruz, Pompeo for trashing Trump peace efforts as Iran appeasement

NYT Makes Whopping Admission on AR-15s, AK-47s, Deals Devastating Blow to Gun Grabbers

California mayors revolt over Newsom bullet train plan they warn could ‘raid’ local tax bases

White House gunman had criminal record, history of mental health issues

Viral teen takeovers unleash chaos nationwide as malls, beaches and restaurants become battlegrounds

American Bar Association Deals Major Blow to DEI in Sweeping Change to Law Schools Across the Country

Spencer Pratt’s viral mayoral run gains traction in Los Angeles despite inconsistencies in messaging

NeverTrumper Bill Kristol Announces He’s a Dem, Gives Most Preposterous Reason for the Change

Dr. Janette Nesheiwat takes new role at Walter Reed treating Havana Syndrome: ‘A profound honor’

Agitators united by Chinese money, hate for America target data centers, experts warn

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”