AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Swalwell slammed by Border Patrol commander over imagery showing ICE raiding Jesus Christ’s manger

Netanyahu says Trump to become first non-Israeli to receive Israel Prize

Home Owned by NASCAR Star Denny Hamlin Destroyed in Deadly Blaze

Look for Times Square Crystal Ball To Do Something Different This Year As USA’s 250th Birthday Approaches

Illegal immigrants allegedly ran multi-million-dollar gift card fraud scheme hitting stores daily across Texas

Trump rebukes Ukraine after Putin says his home was attacked

Gen. Flynn Sends Blistering Request to Trump: ‘We The People Demand Accountability!’

Jan. 6 pipe bomb suspect fights DOJ delay in turning over evidence

Trump Admin Stands Firm After Jesus-Centric Christmas Messages Spark Media Freak-Out

Trump tears up Obama-era Latin American policy with renewal of Monroe Doctrine

Tennessee officers rescue woman considering jumping from bridge on day after Christmas

Ilhan Omar disclosures show husband’s companies surged in value as Minnesota reels from $9B fraud

Top Female Tennis Player Takes on No. 671 Man in ‘Battle of the Sexes’ – It Wasn’t Even Close

‘America first’: Wyoming Secretary of State Chuck Gray launches House bid

Trump Signals Military Hit First Target Inside Venezuela After Finding Drug Facility: ‘We Knocked That Out’

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”