AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Rubio claims ‘tremendous amount of progress’ in Ukraine peace talks following Geneva meeting

Kristi Noem unveils $1B TSA modernization plan, awards $10K bonuses to workers who served during shutdown

Duffy identifies Chicago train victim as 26-year-old Bethany MaGee while blasting city’s ‘carelessness’

Trump claims GOP has ‘never been so united,’ calls Greene and other Republicans ‘lowlifes’

British teen says urine, glue chucked at him while trying to carry on Charlie Kirk’s legacy in UK

Portion of Catholic students kidnapped in Nigeria escape as country grapples with anti-Christian violence

Scottish Lawmakers Refuse to Ban Shocking ‘Assisted Suicides’

Kennedy cousin tied to Martha Moxley case breaks silence 50 years later as murder remains unsolved

Former TV anchor heads to same prison as Ghislaine Maxwell after $63M COVID fraud conviction

Divine Judgment? Iran Experiencing Record Drought, Tehran Faces Evacuation

X’s new location feature exposes apparent fraudster accounts posing as Americans, Gaza journalists

‘Meta Never Told Parents…’: Court Docs Claim Meta Failed to Prevent Abuse of Minors

Trump’s wild Mamdani flip — the insults that came before the love fest

Climate Change Concern Plummets In Big Cities, Poll Finds

State Department Investigates Mass Migration as Potential Human Rights Violation

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”