AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Mississippi law could create statewide registry of undocumented immigrants

Marine missing from USS Anchorage now focus of recovery mission off California coast

Lawsuit filed after tree dubbed ‘Widow Maker’ fatally crushes man at Texas BBQ restaurant

Jacob Frey praises Somali community as Minnesota faces renewed scrutiny over fraud investigations

Trump calls likely DC mayor Janeese Lewis George a ‘communist’ and vows to block her agenda

Trump: Renovations to DC’s East Potomac Golf Links begin in September

Top Democrat lawmaker suffers minor injuries in Delaware car crash

Pollster Stands By Rejected Survey Showing Struggling Democrat in Single Digits That He Released Anyway

Doctor Pushing Puberty Blockers on Teen Boy Was Charged With Possessing Child Porn

Sisters, friend charged in Texas mom’s stabbing death

The Swamp’s Got Another Bright Idea, and It Could End Up Hosing Every American Who Drives

SCOTUS Showdown Over Gun Suppressors Looms After Appeals Court Creates ‘Circuit Split’

Punk Allegedly Pulls Pistol on Workmen, Ends up Tied to Front Porch to Make Police Pickup Quick and Easy

Soft-On-Crime Socialist Set To Run Nation’s Capital Ravaged By Teen Takeovers

What to know about the July Fourth celebrations in DC

See also Alan Greenspan dies at age 100

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”