AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Hegseth Takes House Dem to the Woodshed for Pushing Iranian ‘Propaganda’ at Hearing: ‘Shame on You!’

Minnesota ‘tried to cover up fraud allegations,’ former state trooper alleges

Class and Decency: Watch Johnny Carson Address Reagan Assassination Attempt the Day After It Happened

Bodycam shows dad bolt from cops with young child in his arms before ditching her alone in the woods

Trump DOJ report lays bare Biden administration’s alleged anti-Christian bias

WATCH: Chaos erupts as Florida Dem in pink jumpsuit grabs bullhorn mid-vote: ‘It’s illegal!’

Dem Rep Who Resigned in Disgrace Over Federal Charges Quietly Made Move to Run Again Before Quitting: Reports

David Allan Coe, Outlaw Country Legend Behind ‘Take This Job and Shove It,’ Dies at 86

Biden IRS discriminated against Christian groups, DOJ report finds

Federal appeals court refuses to rehear Trump appeal of $83M E Jean Carroll defamation judgment

Hunter Biden’s ex-lawyer ordered to pay $50K to former Trump aide after harassment claims crumble

Graham urges Trump to ‘ignore’ war powers deadline as GOP grapples with Iran

Cultural groups ask federal judge to halt Trump’s renovations of Kennedy Center

Georgia man says he suffered severe medical neglect leading to amputations at scrutinized Atlanta jail

LAPD chief warns Los Angeles not prepared to secure 2028 Olympics due to staffing shortages

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”