AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Hero Principal Gives Credit Where It’s Due: ‘I Think God’s Hand Was on All of Us’

Airlines Seek Federal Bailouts Following Spirit Airlines Shutdown as Fuel Prices Rise

Key China-Iran infrastructure exposes critical hole in Trump’s war strategy

Xi gifts Trump Chinese rose seeds, on top of new ammo for White House ballroom

Are Marco Rubio’s 2028 presidential prospects on the rise?

Adverse court rulings slow, and may stop, House Democrats’ march to the majority

Trump wraps widely-watched trip to China, departing on Air Force One after high-stakes Xi meeting

Ugandan Evangelist Killed by Suspected Muslims After Sharing the Gospel

Israel, Jews targeted worldwide as well-funded leftist, Islamist groups join for ‘Nakba 78’ protests

This Midwestern state leads the nation in home foreclosures as US filings jump by 26%

Marine Vet Stops Gunman’s 60-Round Shooting Spree: Thankfully He Had a Concealed Carry Permit

Momentum builds to pass bill after Jack Smith’s secret Arctic Frost subpoenas

Bronx man convicted of running secret Chinese police station in Manhattan used to monitor dissidents

Trump touts ‘fantastic trade deals’ in final Xi meeting amid tariff standoff

Trump reveals Xi’s stance on arming Iran as Hormuz tensions rattle markets

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”