AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

SPLC kept paying Aryan Nations operatives after bragging about bankrupting them

Former Florida Gov. Charlie Crist is running for mayor of St. Pete

AI boom tests GOP’s midterm affordability pitch as price pain spreads

WHCA shooting exposes concerns over succession security, number of ‘celebrity’ Cabinet officials at big events

Congress responds to WHCA attack with five separate bills to build Trump’s ballroom

Jasmine Crockett’s social media posts about WHCD shooting show different tones

Mentalist Oz Pearlman to skip Kimmel appearance after Trump dinner shooting

Wisconsin teacher placed on leave after social media post advocating to ‘make Americans great assassins again’

Mamdani and King Charles to attend 9/11 ceremony in New York City: What to know

After Karoline Leavitt Calls Out Dems for Their Vile Anti-Trump Rhetoric, GOP Brings the Receipts

Newsom’s wife lashes out at Trump after he rips ’60 Minutes’ host: ‘Internalized misogyny’

Mamdani’s education plan’s ‘lack of merit’ could fundamentally change student outcomes: GOP leader warns

‘Hell Week’ in Washington: A look at House Republicans’ current bind, and how we got here

DOJ Moves Against White House Ballroom Lawsuit in Wake of Shooting: ‘Enough Is Enough’

Pastor known for marriage advice arrested at rumored swingers community accused of having multiple wives

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”