AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Former Trump lawyer accuses federal judge of making ‘baseless accusations of lying’ after departure

Missouri couple accused of locking teens in chicken pen, shooting them with BB guns in abuse case

House passes AI education bill for small businesses in landslide 395-14 vote

Cities Church Issues Full-Throated Response to Invasion of their Sunday Worship Service by Leftist Agitators

Illegal immigrant allegedly ran from deadly wrong-way DUI crash that killed motorcyclist, records show

DHS says ICE agents rammed by vehicles amid Minneapolis enforcement surge: ‘Aggressively assaulted’

Ilhan Omar vows ‘not to give ICE a single cent’ in heated congressional funding fight

ALERT: Dem Rep Publicly Supports Assault on Christian Worship Service by Leftist Agitators

Pennsylvania county official seeks to evict of DHS and ICE over three years of unpaid rent

One Incredibly Simple Map Explains Why Greenland Is 100 Percent Vital to US Security

The Harris Campaign Probed Whether Tim Walz Was a Chinese Agent During VP Selection Process: Report

ICE: Minnesota won’t let us arrest 1,360 criminal illegal immigrants in state jails

Tariffs, Greenland, and a ‘nasty’ binder clip: Five takeaways from Trump’s marathon first-anniversary press briefing

California GOP asks Supreme Court to block House map ahead of midterm elections

Gavin Newsom Freaks Out After Arriving at Davos and Hearing What World Leaders Are Saying About Trump

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”