AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Five Severed Human Heads Discovered Hanging on Beach in Apparent Drug Cartel Warning

Radical Groups Like Renee Good’s Are Tailing ICE All Over America

Trump accuses Tim Walz and Ilhan Omar of using ICE protests to distract from massive state fraud

Surgeon ex in Ohio dentist murders job hopped across country, dodged lawsuits after divorce

Cori Bush ripped for ‘jaw-dropping’ hypocrisy on key issue amid comeback House bid

The Redistricting Scheme That Could Help Dems Retake the House

Lawyers Claim Man’s Life ‘Stolen’ By ICE: Turns Out He Shot at an Officer

Professors were disciplined for vulgar posts after Charlie Kirk’s assassination: where are they now?

Russia tries to revive its relevance with support for Iran after failure to fight US moves in Venezuela

Trump vows to ‘take out’ Indiana GOP leader over redistricting fight

Homan Confirms ICE Agent Who Shot Renee Good Is ‘in Hiding’ Amid Rabid Leftist Death Threats

Progressive-backed Analilia Mejia faces uphill battle in bid to replace Mikie Sherrill

Border Patrol commander vows continued tear gas use after Minnesota fedreal judge’s order

Man allegedly assaulted with flagpole by Minneapolis anti-ICE agitators in violent parking garage attack

Tim Walz Gets the Response He Deserves After Suddenly Saying He Wants to ‘Turn the Temperature Down’

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”