AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

DHS says ICE agents will not be at polling places during midterms

Trump admin says VA benefits claims backlog below 100K for first time in 6 years: ‘Record levels of service’

Trump administration blocks Venezuela from paying Maduro’s legal bills amid federal charges

Murder suspect in Baltimore robbery spree was on probation, records show

Authorities preparing to return home of Nancy Guthrie back to family: report

Toddler flees in terror as coyote chases him outside California family home in broad daylight

Ex-Air Force pilot arrested for allegedly training Chinese military pilots without authorization

Some of the most notable guests at Trump’s 2026 State of the Union: photos

Senators Sanders and Mullin clash in heated Senate hearing exchange: ‘You’re part of the problem’

Trump’s fraud czar nominee touts Minnesota blueprint to root out Obamacare fraud, senior scams

Trump’s ‘war on fraud’ draws range of reactions during SOTU speech

Former top Harris adviser ignites backlash over ‘political props’ comment targeting USA men’s hockey team

The Laundering of Iran’s Atrocities: How Western Voices Became a Shield for the Islamic Republic’s Mass Killings

Capitol Tea: Jim Justice, of Babydog fame, offers to take over Tillis dog parade

Karoline Leavitt Drops List of Policies Dems Wouldn’t Stand For, Including Voter ID and Fewer Murders

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”