AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

WATCH: Pelosi dodges questions on husband’s new hit-and-run charge

Top Trump official makes new SAVE Act case to Republicans behind closed doors

Nancy Guthrie video may have been erased after FBI kept out for days, director says

Florida man arrested in IHOP restaurant after police say he stabbed a rideshare driver

Dem ‘Epstein class’ attack backfires as top candidates funded by Epstein-tied billionaire

Muslim Dem Candidate Exposes Flaw in Wokeness Allyship, Now Says She’s Getting Silenced Because She Didn’t Embrace LGBT Agenda

Cuba built covert network inside America through spies, activists and universities, State Dept alleges

Pentagon Releases Video of Latest Strikes on Iran After Trump Orders Revenge for Fallen US Troops

Two House races take center stage as conservative PAC launches multimillion-dollar Big Tech push

Jeff Clark’s yearslong disbarment fight tests reach of DC Bar over Trump DOJ

Trump’s GOP clout faces Arizona test with House majority, governor’s race at stake

DOJ’s creative solution to transgender prison case would move male inmates into specialized unit

DOJ opens probe into Harvard’s financial aid for alleged discrimination against American students

Bodycam catches Sunny Hostin invoking her legal chops as cops cite Harvard-grad son for trespassing

Trump says first call with new UK PM Burnham went ‘very well,’ pledges US support

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”