AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Former House intel leader points to Dem rhetoric ‘encouraging’ violence as 8th man charged in UFC terror plot

Hollywood Libs Pour Love on Beijing, Tout China as ‘First Petro-Zero Economy,’ But Facts Show Different Story

Global Elitism at Work: Amid Heatwave, European Commission Shuts Off AC – But Only For Lower-Level Workers

Bill Barr says Todd Blanche isn’t ‘a toady,’ urges senate to confirm Trump’s AG pick

Kentucky man charged with boating under the influence after female passenger, 19, goes missing

Are You Gay Enough To Get A California Utilities Contract? Here’s The Test

How a Ministry Is Spreading Christianity in Iran Using AI

Women accuse Pearadise founder of preying on them by turning ‘safe space’ into mansion of manipulation

NY governor hopeful vows showdown with Mamdani over socialist agenda: ‘I will stop him’

Firefighter brother of 9/11 victim incensed by ‘radical’ Muslims winning key Dem primaries

Trump-backed Letlow takes on John Fleming in runoff to replace Bill Cassidy

Incoming socialist DC mayor has a weak hand against Trump administration

People On Food Stamps Can Keep Buying Junk With Your Tax Dollars, Obama Judge Rules

Lawyer who beat Hawaii gun law calls state’s reliance on Black Code ‘disgraceful’

American Woman in Mexico Convicted for Drugging and Killing Men She Met on Dating Apps

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”