AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Minnesota bill would ban warrants allowing police to collect data from devices near a crime scene

Jasmine Crockett defends her security guard who was killed in police standoff, wanted for impersonating cop

ABC News Left Out Crucial Context In Story About Iran Drone Threat To California

Anti-ICE agitators blow cover in Boston, allowing child rape suspect to evade arrest for weeks

Utah children’s book author Kouri Richins convicted in husband’s murder

Trump questions Newsom’s fitness for White House, citing his dyslexia

Court allows DOJ to proceed with appeal over law firm executive orders

Trump lawyer in Jack Smith case draws conservative backing after DOJ praise rattles ‘elite’ legal conference

Vance accuses media of trying to ‘drive a wedge’ between him and Trump over Iran

Cornyn clashes with progressive Rep Greg Casar in heated airport face-off over DHS shutdown

Trump Kennedy Center’s board votes unanimously to approve $257M renovations and two-year closure

Father Sues Blue-State School District on Behalf of His Son Over Pledge of Allegiance

Leaked audio reveals new Iranian supreme leader survived strike because he went outside

Head of Kennedy Center Who Fired Founder of The Western Journal Over Biblical Values Is Now Stepping Down

Greg Bovino, face of Trump’s mass deportation campaign, to retire after controversial Minneapolis raids

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”