AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Establishment Dem defeats socialist challenger in crucial battleground Senate primary

Incumbent GOP governor rolls to primary victory after keeping Trump at a distance

US Marshals Find 79 Missing and Endangered Children During Historic Operation

Breaking: US Responds to Failed Iran Strikes, Attacks Oil Tankers as Iran’s Economy Deteriorates

Lindsay Clancy juror admitted ‘reasonable doubt’ but still refused insanity verdict, foreperson says

Mamdani drops massive 9/11 records trove as old claims about Ground Zero come under fire

Karmelo Anthony photographed with guns as docs reveal alleged history of rage, threats and violence

Kansas Republicans buck Trump over threat to blacklist Canadian jets

Fetterman leans on unlikely GOP ally as Dems sharpen their knives over explosive report

House Oversight Committee Calls Out LA Mayor Karen Bass After She Dodges Testifying at Hearing

Popular Egyptian TV Host Sentenced to Death by Hanging in Drug Trafficking Case

Major blue state hospital pulls plug on controversial child transgender treatments after DOJ intervention

Reporter’s Notebook: Dem rebels expose cracks in Jeffries’ House leadership

Socialist Convention Panelists Declare Fitness ‘Body Fascism,’ Claim Capitalism is ‘Genociding Fat People’

DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin Announces Symbolic Change to Official Agency Seal

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”