AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Mossad Director Meets with US Officials in DC as Trump Resists Netanyahu’s Calls to Reignite Iran War: Report

‘Traitor!’: Jeffries gets rude awakening at Democratic convention as heckler erupts

Justice Samuel Alito Warns Congressional Democrats Have the Ability to ‘Turn Off the Lights’ for the Supreme Court

Schumer’s former ally mounts leadership challenge as Democrats face rare internal power struggle

Undercover Israeli agents will testify in Louisiana against alleged Oct. 7 terrorist: Judge

Alaska is still counting votes more than a week after Election Day: What to know

Trump’s spy chiefs put Republican leaders on the clock over ‘huge priority’ as power shift looms over Congress

The mistake newly-elected Dems admit they can’t afford to make with Trump after sweeping 2026 wins

Mamdani Set to Disband NYPD’s Counterterrorism and Protest Response Unit: Report

Fact Check: No, Guard Did Not Yell at Hegseth at Tomb of the Unknown Soldier – Just Watch Raw Video and Listen

Rubio’s next move? Lawyers eye speech of ‘visionary’ leader for 2028 clues after GOP’s midterm wipeout

Empire State Building climbers face deportation fears after attorney claims plea deal fell apart

Schumer’s Senate leadership fight intensifies as key progressive backs challenger and more top headlines

Tough Guy Viciously Attacks Family Over Christian Tract in Halloween Candy, Then Becomes Total Coward When Internet Tracks Him Down

Huge GOP election losses spur debates about populist economics

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”