AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Wyoming Supreme Court rules laws restricting abortion violate state constitution

Trump admin expands visa bond requirement to 38 countries, with fees up to $15K

Video shows masked thieves using sledgehammer in brazen Lululemon heist before fleeing in U-Haul

Vance reposts sombrero meme mocking Democrats’ Jan 6 candlelight vigil

‘The People’s Qur’an’: Mamdani announces NYC Quran exhibit with book belonging to revolutionary activist

Biden, Who Donated Less Than 1 Percent of His Income to Charity at Times, Is Getting the Single Most ‘Extravagant’ Presidential Pension in History

Pardoned Jan. 6 participants demand ‘retribution’ in first commemorative march on Capitol

Jasmine Crockett Has Vulgar Response to SCOTUS After She Lost District in Texas

Trump announces Venezuela turning over millions of barrels of oil to US government ‘immediately’

Massive luxury handbag heist caught on camera as heavily armed police swarm California store

Alert: Michael Reagan, Son of President Ronald Reagan, Has Died

Maduro hires Reagan-era DOJ attorney in narco-terrorism case

US gains leverage over Canadian oil, weakens China amid US plans to overhaul Venezuelan oil market

Tim Walz Panicking as DHS Begins ‘Largest Immigration Operation Ever’ in Minnesota

Abrego Garcia says government can’t re-arrest him despite recent deportation order

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”