AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Savannah Guthrie offers $1 million family reward for recovery of Nancy Guthrie

France restricts Trump ambassador’s access to officials after missed summons

Idaho woman accused of attempting to set fire to DHS building with stolen ambulance

Alert: Massive Development Reported in DOJ’s Sedition Case Against Mark Kelly, Others – Bad News for Trump Admin

Speechwriters from Reagan to Biden agree: Trump’s SOTU is a critical test for his second term

California GOP infighting could destroy any chance at governorship

Trump to come face-to-face with Supreme Court justices who rejected tariffs at State of the Union

Prosecutors: Utah Mom Who Wrote Children’s Book About Grief After Husband Died Actually Killed Him

FBI records contradict claims Biden was ‘not aware’ of Mar-a-Lago raid

Conservative super PAC drops six-figure ad buy in major move to defend Trump’s trifecta

EXCLUSIVE: Trump to center SOTU on working families with sweeping economic case

Good Samaritans Help Chicago Family Recover Stolen Dog

Potential ’28 Presidential Candidate Gavin Newsom Continues to Backtrack on Trans Sports Debate

Missouri suspect taken into custody after deputy fatally shot, ending manhunt

California allocating $35M to support illegal immigrants amid Trump’s mass deportation agenda

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”