AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Muslims Kill 9 Members of Prominent Pastor’s Family in Targeted Attack

Mamdani dodges on ‘political theater’ of empty Netanyahu arrest threat, calls for US action and NYC protests

WATCH: Tlaib tells Mamdani to ‘call me’ for help arresting Netanyahu as Democrats remain divided

Nigeria Unveils First Memorial for Persecuted Christians

Reporter’s Notebook: House’s final sprint puts SAVE America Act and Iran funding in play

‘Is Mickey Mouse Racist?’: GOP’s Brandon Gill Corners Smithsonian Director on Leftist Policies

New Jersey Dem gov’s blame game backfires after tech company pins noncitizen voter registration on state

US soldier believed to be killed in Jordan attack remembered as living ‘life of courage and selflessness’

From NFL Legend, to NFL Owner, to… WWE Superstar? Tom Brady Slaps Controversial YouTuber

Trump administration has lost or abandoned hundreds of lawsuits against anti-ICE protesters, migrants: report

New report uncovers education groups’ DEI push to shape how artificial intelligence is used in classrooms

Hegseth turns tables on Dems as sparks fly during hearing clash: ‘I put this on you’

Mike Lindell proposes six-month amnesty for illegal immigrants if elected Minnesota governor

Trump flexes GOP muscle in Arizona primaries as Dems dodge far-left upset

Rubio says US remains open to Iran talks but warns there ‘will be consequences’

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”