AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Watch: Rubio Gives Single Most Brutally Honest Description of Islam by a Secretary of State in Modern US History

Air Force Base Placed Under Lockdown After Deadly Shooting

Kash Patel set to tout crucial FBI reforms that many Americans may not know about: ‘Real security’

Republicans signal no retreat on SAVE Act as marathon Senate debate kicks off

Trump Allows Key Deadline to Expire, Setting Up Huge Republican Showdown

SAVE America Act showdown relished by GOP and Democrats alike

Tuberville defends post likening Mamdani to 9/11 attacks: ‘I just go by his rhetoric’

FBI rescues missing teen from Florida hotel after month-long hunt for accused kidnapper

Dem congressional candidate Bobby Pulido depicts lewd behavior in controversial music video for his song

AIPAC-backed Chicago Democrat loses primary despite outside spending blitz

Pritzker scores big: Stratton wins Illinois Senate primary in test of governor’s clout

Former congresswoman wins primary to take back former suburban Chicago seat

Democrat Patty García gains party’s nomination after controversial last-minute dropout by incumbent

WATCH: Tom Homan Exposes the Entire Dem Scheme With Illegals, Says They ‘Sold This Country Out for Future Political Power’

Two dead in Israel after Iranian missile attack near Tel Aviv

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”