AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Louisiana man accused of killing wife, propping her body up for multistate drive

Todd Blanche backs Jeanine Pirro after Lincoln Memorial pool vandalism case dismissal

Trump orders major cut to US-South Korea drills as North Korea ramps up missile tests

Long Island street takeover erupts as drivers block road, perform donuts, burnouts: police

CENTCOM commander touts USS Abraham Lincoln mental health record after more than 260 days without port call

Wes Moore: Trump’s response to USS Lincoln crew concerns ‘pisses me off’

Anti-Israel nonprofit under federal investigation over financial dealings: report

Progressive Minneapolis mayor’s viral hip-hop moves spark ‘humiliation ritual’ mockery online

This Chinese Company Imports Workers And Is Accused Of Polluting Hungary’s Water. It Also Gets Tax Breaks In US.

Federal judge clears path for border wall construction in Arizona

Humanoid robots could patrol southern border, CEO pitches, as futuristic technology moves closer to reality

Men Are Not Women: Stand Up for the Truth

The only map you need to see as California’s billionaire tax fight heats up

Lexington, Kentucky park shooting kills 1, injures 4 during live band performance

Democrats Want ID for Hot Pockets But Not for Voting?

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”