AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

WH Investigating Ex-Kennedy Center Head Over Reportedly Missing $5.6 Million Donation – Had Previously Fired Western Journal Founder Over His Faith

DOJ case attacks mass murder fandom culture behind Canadian school shooting

Bill and Hillary Clinton make eleventh-hour midterm moves as party’s old guard faces new reality

Somalis in Minnesota unleash fury on Trump after feds raid Ilhan Omar’s DC home

MS NOW Reporter Offers Hilarious Apology After Fake Reporting: Kash Patel ‘Did Not, in Fact, Land in Russia’

Gaza cut off from commercial goods imports, Israel says

James Talarico Tries To Play Moderate at CNN Town Hall, Gets Owned on Abortion by Catholic Voter

Watch: El-Sayed Visibly Stunned When NBC Turns Screws on Muslim Brotherhood Connection, Forces Him to Answer

Trump shares photos of ‘fully renovated White House facade’

Fox News ‘Antisemitism Exposed’ Newsletter: Israel haters admit what they really want

Obama’s billion-dollar baby: Chicago center’s price tag hits monumental milestone, tripling original estimate

Investigators zero in on possible cause of Wisconsin plane crash that killed 6

DOJ gives California 48 hours to review list of possible noncitizens on voter rolls

Infinitely Gracious Caitlin Clark Defends Sulking Teammate Who Confirmed She Resents Clark

The Virtue Signaling Behind the Failing Somalia-to-Welfare Funnel

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”