AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Twin Blue-State Punks Meet SWAT Justice After Threatening Medieval Torture, Then Murder of DHS Asst. Dir. Tricia McLaughlin

McDonald’s Pulls Unsettling Christmas Commercial After it Sparks Massive Backlash

Federal appeals court lets Pentagon reinstate transgender service ban, says judge overstepped military leaders

Expert reveals key factor that led to massive Minnesota fraud scheme

ABC Signs Jimmy Kimmel to a New Deal Months After Affiliate Revolt

Gene Simmons gives Alex Padilla’s son music career advice: ‘Have a fall back position’

Watch: David Spade Roasts Mall That Refused to Say ‘Christmas,’ Calls Out Rampant Christian Persecution

European talks reshape Ukraine’s peace plan as Zelenskyy refuses territorial concessions

Trump’s approval climbs as Republicans rally behind president’s affordability agenda: poll

Luigi Mangione said ‘all these people here for a mass murder, why?’ at arraignment: police officer

New Jersey twins arrested for threatening to kill DHS spokeswoman and ICE officers

DOJ fights major obstacle to bring new case against Comey

Gene Simmons says musician royalty act is about protecting the next Elvis Presley

Vermont school district flies Somali flag amid massive fraud investigation in divisive move: GOP chair

Lawsuit: Man Died After Royal Caribbean Served Him Dozens of Alcoholic Beverages and Sedated Him

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”