AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

ODNI sends criminal referrals to DOJ for ex-IG, whistleblower tied to Trump impeachment

Catholic JFK Laid Out How Presidents Should Deal With Papal Criticism in Famous 1960 Speech

School Agrees to Pay Up After Counselor Was Fired for Objecting to Transgender Policy

Woman added to FBI’s Ten Most Wanted list arrested hours later after tips poured in from Florida: Patel

Hunter Biden now living abroad as legal troubles mount, court filing reveals

DC curfew ends as teen takeover fears clock in – city braces for chaos amid spring break mayhem

Watch: As Walls Close in, Schiff’s Own Words Come Back to Haunt Him in Resurfaced Pardon Video He Wishes Didn’t Exist

What to know about the Freedom 250 UFC fight on the White House lawn

Left-Wing Mob, Violent Threats Force Erika Kirk to Miss TPUSA Event with JD Vance

Trump reveals he has multi-pick SCOTUS plan ready as retirement speculation heats up

WATCH: Ex-NATO chief draws red line as Trump fumes alliance abandoned US during Iran war

Jeanine Pirro accused of trying to ‘circumvent’ Jerome Powell investigation through unprompted Fed ‘tour’

Millions tap Trump tax cuts this filing season as refunds top $3,400

Trump-Tillis tiff deepens as president says he ‘quit,’ concedes Fed fight could doom new chair confirmation

Man with Joker-inspired rifle fires gun, runs into traffic near Trump golf course, deputies say

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”