AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Trump demand puts vulnerable Republicans in impossible spot ahead of midterms

Anti-Violence Activist Allegedly Stabs Woman With Box Cutter

Obama Granted Bill Gates Top Secret Clearance At Energy Department

Fauci’s diary details how his relationship with Trump soured

It’s OK to be nostalgic about Woody Allen’s ‘Midnight in Paris’

The race to replace Gretchen Whitmer in Michigan

Inside the behemoth Smithsonian museum network drawing fire from the Trump administration

Vulnerable Democrat warns party to ‘fight back’ against growing socialist movement

Louisiana becomes latest state to launch Fauci investigation following explosive Senate hearing

New Mexico woman’s bodycam confession about hiding newborn baby in hospital garbage tossed by state court

Fox News Campus Radicals Newsletter: Parents left in the dark, Trump starving socialist breeding grounds

Democratic socialist headed for $142K legislature salary begs for rent handout, deletes post after backlash

Multiple people killed in shooting at Idaho In-N-Out restaurant, suspect dead

ICE arrests illegal immigrant accused of rape, multiple sex crimes after release from Maryland jail

Father of 10-year-old boy breaks silence after viral beach rescue: ‘No way I could ever repay him’

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”