AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Haitian Illegal Immigrant Who Went Viral for Shouting ‘Biden Forever!’ During Arrest Deported by ICE

Thomas Massie Says He Intentionally Blindsided House Leaders When Filing Hegseth Impeachment Articles

‘Worse than Watergate’ New FBI files detail agent’s push to join Trump probe, investigate Elon Musk

5 states could be the biggest losers in Trump’s trade war with Canada, expert warns

Injured Louisiana boy hailed a ‘superhero’ for seeking help during deadly stabbing rampage

Florida woman allegedly drugs man she met at club, steals his nearly $100K Rolex: police

Muslim Mayor of Dearborn Invites Rapper Booted from Stadium Tour Over Anti-Israel Rant to Perform in City

International protests break out over rising oil and gas costs

Internet Trolls Karen Bass After She Deflects Blame for City’s Crumbling Roads

EU wants Canada to be its first associate member

Most of School’s 9/11 Curriculum Focuses on Muslim Acceptance, Teachers Told Not to ‘Center’ on the Terrorists

Congress faces AI test as debate explodes over industry regulation

El-Sayed grilled on Piker, Israel and socialist ties after Mike Rogers skips Senate debate

US military releases footage of massive operation to rescue injured airman stranded inside Iran

Multiple death sentences in different states are set to be carried out within 24 hours: ‘Not very common’

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”