AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Iran, Uranium, and Epic Fury: All You Need To Know About The Iranian-U.S. Conflict

Blackmon: Drill, Baby, Drill Makes Modest Comeback

Atlanta teen arrested for murder after fatal shooting of 12-year-old inside home

Iran talks done in by Tehran’s delusions over leverage they don’t have, US official says

NBA Player Jaden Ivey Seen Street Preaching After Stand for Biblical Marriage

Victor Davis Hanson Breaks Down Why US Must Rethink NATO Strategy

Conservative group launches $5M ad blitz pressuring Senate on voter ID as GOP eyes SAVE America Act push

Trump orders a blockade in the Strait of Hormuz as tensions with Iran soar

Tax Day is this week: Avoid these 5 common mistakes that can cost you money

Dave Ramsey Said No – As Usual – But One of The Backstreet Boys Made Her Dream Come True Anyway

Athena Strand’s killer FedEx driver’s split personas, defense scream ‘manipulation,’ not madness: expert

Judge Boots PETA Suit Designed to Do Away with Dachshund, Pug, Bulldog, and Other So-Called ‘Deformed’ Breeds

Ex-Biden staffer claims accidental shot killed girlfriend as dad blasts toxic, abusive relationship: report

Appeals court says federal judge must reconsider blocking WH ballroom, weigh national security concerns

Outrage builds over illegal immigrant ‘invasion’ after suspect allegedly executes teen who begged for life

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”