AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Military families demand DOJ distribute nearly $800M from French cement company found guilty of bribing ISIS

Children’s YouTube Superstar Announces the Death of His 14-Year-Old Son

Kyle Busch 911 Call Released, Shedding New Light on His Shocking Death

Way harder than it should be: Why Congress may balk on $1.7B compensation fund

Grady Judd puts parents on notice over TikTok teen takeovers: ‘We’re gonna come lock you up too’

NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani releases audit accusing federal immigration agents of misleading tactics

Republicans get ‘aggressive’ in fight to win top cop spots in battleground states

Georgetown Cupcake keg-throwing suspect turned in by his own father after recognizing surveillance footage

Trump ties himself to Giants quarterback Jaxson Dart during New York swing

Trump Admin Order Could Force Hundreds of Thousands of Foreigners to Leave the US

Trump Abruptly Cancels Plans to Attend Son’s Wedding, Heading Straight Back to DC

Judge dismisses human smuggling charges against Kilmar Abrego Garcia

FBI launches ‘fittest agent’ competition for field offices

Warren torched over ‘my kind of man’ praise for Platner after death-wish post for wounded veteran resurfaces

Trump administration orders green card applicants to leave the US, apply from their home countries

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”