AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

DC pipe bomb suspect says someone needed to ‘speak up’ about stolen election claims

Marjorie Taylor Greene criticizes Trump’s meetings with Zelenskyy, Netanyahu: ‘Can we just do America’

Tim Walz pushes back on Minnesota fraud allegations following viral daycare video

Ilhan Omar’s Somaliland stance slammed as Minnesota fraud scandal deepens

Trump, Zelenskyy say Ukraine peace deal close but ‘thorny issues’ remain after Florida talks

ICE delivers ‘greatest gift of all’ with Christmas arrests of convicted criminals across multiple states

Major cities see violent crime surge as national rates plummet significantly in 2025: survey

Deadly helicopter collision in New Jersey kills one, critically injures another

Is This Legal?: Leftist Group Recruits Military Officials to Turn Against Trump’s Drug Cartel Strikes

Charlie Kirk’s killing, Idaho murders plea and Karen Read verdict: Inside 2025’s biggest crime moments

FBI surges resources to Minnesota as Patel calls $250M fraud scheme ‘tip of iceberg’

‘Worst of the worst’: The 10 most violent illegal immigrants nabbed in 2025

Brits Weighed In on Whether Die Hard Is a Christmas Movie – Do You Agree with Them?

‘We are not afraid’: Erika Kirk vows TPUSA will continue campus debates nationwide

Crockett Flies Into a Rage Over Vance’s ‘Street-Girl Persona’ Comments

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”