AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Flashback: How James Woods Encountered, Then Reported Multiple 9/11 Hijackers to the FBI

Trump Rejects Saudi Crown Prince’s Pleas for New U.S. Strikes in Middle East: Report

Trump admin’s fraud crackdown targets foreigners accused of infiltrating U.S. federal programs

Giuliani blasts Mamdani’s 9/11 toxic air blame as buried city records come to light

In pictures: Trump, Bush, and more pay their respects at 9/11 ceremonies across three sites on 25th anniversary

Lone holdout juror in Lindsay Clancy trial was only Black person on the jury, panelist reveals: report

WATCH LIVE: Trump, first lady, Hegseth, and more attend 9/11 memorial at the Pentagon

Sept. 11 in photos: Washington Examiner photographer Graeme Jennings shares his images from the aftermath of 9/11

Trump set to honor 9/11 victims and first responders at Pentagon and more top headlines

The Ghouls Come Out After Erika Kirk Breaks Her Silence on Anniversary of Charlie’s Death

We Forgot 9/11: Then We Swore a Mayor In on the Qur’an – Part Two

25 years later, 9/11 memories endure as nation gathers to honor nearly 3,000 lives lost

Ontario premier wants Republicans to lose House and Senate over Trump’s trade war

The unlucky 13: States bordering Canada are particularly hard-hit by trade war

Wendell Berry, 1934-2026

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”