AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

EXCLUSIVE: Epstein emails to be released as DOJ says no criminal or inappropriate conduct by Trump

Reporter’s Notebook: Senate funding deal hits snag as Graham presses sanctuary city vote

Watch: Trump’s Hilariously Honest Response to Reports He Fell Asleep During the Last Cabinet Meeting

Texas Issues Disaster Declaration as Flesh-Eating Parasite Spreads North from Mexico

Federal agents arrest 3 more people in connection to Minnesota church storming

Accused US killer captured in Mexico after monthslong international manhunt for recycling bin murder

Damning Video: Trump Plays Elizabeth Warren’s Eulogy for Alex Pretti Over Footage of Pretti Wildly Attacking ICE, Destroying Property – the Result Is Truly Blistering

Ilhan Omar Has Bizarre Response When Questioned About What She Did After Being Sprayed by Vinegar

Federal judge backs away from threat to hold ICE leader in contempt

Trump and GOP eye midterm convention cities in high-stakes bid to hold House, Senate

Trump officials work to ease tensions in Minneapolis as secretive negotiations progress

Who’s turning up for oil rig work in post-Maduro Venezuela

Trump administration military strikes against drug cartels in Mexico would carry risks

Explosion at metal fabricating plant leaves at least 4 people injured in Pennsylvania

AOC voices support for anti-ICE shutdown, declines to participate

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”