AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

New Hampshire suspect who shot officer and triggered massive manhunt killed in police gunfight

Savannah Guthrie’s Easter message reveals anguish as mom missing 63 days

Greene says Trump isn’t Christian in slamming Easter threat to reopen Strait of Hormuz

CNN Analyst Breaks Down the Numbers for Dems, Reveals Their Own Voters Can’t Stand Them

Blue States Scrambling to Circumvent SCOTUS Ruling, Save Censorship of Gender Counseling

Billboard trolling Dale Warner goes viral after his murder conviction in wife Dee’s case

Watch: Inept Texas Judge Blasted After Camera Catches Him Cursing Kind Computer Tech – Now His Nasty Emails Demanding Respect Have Leaked, Too

One of a Kind Video: Kid Rock Uses Apache Hovering Behind His House to Torment Gavin Newsom

America’s Decaying Highways Are About to Get Much Worse Thanks to Key Fund’s Demise

Tax day is next week: Avoid these 5 common mistakes that can cost you money

Thousands of Christian Families Are Facing Eviction in This Muslim Country

Commission Votes to Approve WH Ballroom Despite Official Injunction, Major Pushback

Trump admin urges restoring ballroom construction in emergency motion: ‘Time is of the essence’

Carter: Hospitals Pick Your Pocket, and Washington Lets Them

Trump Wins Big with Surprising Jobs Report: It Reveals an Economy of Resilience

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”