AOC: Impeachment ‘About Preventing a Potentially Disastrous Outcome from Occurring Next Year’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said today’s public hearing in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump was ”not just about something that has occurred.”

She said it was instead “about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez said, “The whole point of the public hearings is to present the facts to the public and let the general public see the facts for themselves and understand why we have chosen to move forward with the impeachment inquiry. What we heard today was astounding and devastating news for the president and anyone in the administration, really partaking. Frankly, this is devastating for the country. Our national security has been compromised, our elections potentially compromised. I think right now what Republicans have to do is decide what their role is going to be in the scope of history. We will look back at this time and really truly examine the moral decisions each member of Congress decided to make.”

Many RNC Convention Attendees Balked at Trump’s Plan to Cut $5K Checks for Americans

Tucker Carlson Defends El-Sayed on 9/11, Condemns His GOP Opponent Mike Rogers

Smithsonian’s dark take on America exposed: Washington dubbed ‘town destroyer,’ Revolutionary War ‘dangerous’

Alito, Thomas shred ‘Hail Mary’ challenge to federal ballot mail rules in dissent

Surrogate who refused abortion asks SCOTUS to intervene as baby could be moved out of Texas

Georgia mayor, 23, ousted 10 months after making history as state’s youngest mayor

Republicans Attack GOP Candidate for Pointing Out How Many Foreign Students Attended Texas-Ohio State Game

Breaking: SCOTUS Blocks Trump’s Mail-in Ballot Restrictions Months Before Midterms

‘Trojan horses’ in America: Congress probes influence networks tied to China, Iran and Cuba

House Dems face Trump tariff dilemma as major Russia sanctions bill heads to floor

Supreme Court rejects Trump bid to revive strict mail-ballot rules before midterms

Trump Gives Huge Update on Russia-Ukraine War That Could Ease Pain at the Gas Pumps

Mamdani blasts feds for waging ‘campaign of violence and terror’ against NYC’s immigrants

House unanimously votes to eliminate 1-cent coin permanently

GOP Gov. Candidate Forced to Swim for His Life After Plane Crash – Reporter Says Water Was ‘Only 30 Feet’ Deep

She continued, “This call with Ambassador Sondland and President Trump is a personal call that our witnesses testified an aide was overhearing where Trump was personally invested in these investigations and add a layer of proximity. One of the ways the president could have potentially tried to get out of this situation is put several degrees of separation between him and some of this illicit activity. What we heard today was he himself was making and partaking in some of these phone calls, not just Guiliani and not just anyone else in the administration, but him. That really adds a much more disturbing degree of the involvement that he had in using the powers of government to create politically motivated investigations.”

She added, “I’d like to remind everyone, one of the initial people who brought this conversation of quid pro quo into this conversation was the president. It was when these allegations first came out about Ukraine, he started tweeting and frankly raising the bar saying, ‘No quid pro quo, no quid pro quo.’ It wasn’t Democrats that set that bar, because you don’t need quid pro quo. He met it, all of that aside, we’re focused on him using the power of the United States government to engage in extortion of a foreign government in order to intervene in our elections. I think that’s our message, the fact he undermined national security, that he is trying to undermine an election, he is engaged in flagrant abuse of power should be a concern to all Americans who believe in rule of law in the United States of America.”