Harvard Law School Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz described Robert Mueller’s Wednesday statement — in which the former FBI director implied that President Donald Trump might have committed obstruction of justice — as a “political gift” for “radicals” among Democrats “seeking to institute impeachment proceedings” against the president.
Dershowitz wrote at the Hill:
[Robert Mueller] went beyond the conclusion of his report and gave a political gift to Democrats in Congress who are seeking to institute impeachment proceedings against President Trump. By implying that President Trump might have committed obstruction of justice, Mueller effectively invited Democrats to institute impeachment proceedings. Obstruction of justice is a “high crime and misdemeanor” which, under the Constitution, authorizes impeachment and removal of the president.
Dershowitz previously rejected descriptions of Mueller’s conduct as partisan. He also accepted assumptions of good faith on behalf of Mueller’s ostensible investigation of claims of “the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election” but has now changed his mind about the former Obama official’s impartiality:
Trump used catering truck, Air Force One decoy to evade Iran threat: report
Family Recounts Chilling Meetings with Doctors, Nurses Before Beloved Grandmother Was Euthanized, Allegedly Against Her Will and Theirs
Dem Gov Maura Healey signs sweeping Massachusetts bill allowing abortions up to birth
Mamdani’s luxury-home tax rollout derailed for now as judge delivers win to NYC homeowners over massive list
Geraldo Proves Trump Right, Calls Haiti ‘Hell’ While Whining About Haitians Being Deported Home
Video: Caitlin Clark’s Suspension Reversed After Ref’s Bizarre Technical Overturned – This as Allegations of Open Racism Flare in WNBA
Fauci Admitted 2nd Dose of COVID Vaccine ‘Theoretically Could Be Associated with Miscarriage’ in Newly Released Texts
Unlicensed NYC boat operator allegedly ignored safety warnings before mother, baby died in capsizing: feds
Top Senate Dem’s new tax idea gets torched as critics warn nearly every American could pay
Fauci in the hot seat as GOP senator tears into ‘truly sick’ vaccine texts: ‘Tip of the iceberg’
State Department Has Revoked Over 175K Visas to Date for Criminals and Others During Trump’s 2nd Term
Graphic: UK Cop Tries to Arrest Man Who Bought Baseball Bat and Carried It Out of Store, Crowd Comes to Man’s Defense Instead of Cop’s
‘Common sense against crazy’: Trump-backed candidate sounds alarm on socialist Hong in Wisconsin race
Child vaccine schedule reduced as Trump moves to dramatically shift medical power to parents
Georgia jogger runs for her life after stranger allegedly tries to mow her down 3 times
Until today, I have defended Mueller against the accusations that he is a partisan. I did not believe that he personally favored either the Democrats or the Republicans, or had a point of view on whether President Trump should be impeached. But I have now changed my mind. By putting his thumb, indeed his elbow, on the scale of justice in favor of impeachment based on obstruction of justice, Mueller has revealed his partisan bias. He also has distorted the critical role of a prosecutor in our justice system. [emphasis added]
Prosecutors are not in a position to determine anyone’s guilt or innocence, noted Dershowitz, recalling the presumption of innocence and reminding readers that determinations of guilt or innocence within America’s justice system require a “full adversarial trial with a zealous defense attorney, vigorous cross examination, exclusionary rules of evidence, and other due process safeguards.”
Dershowitz assessed:
No prosecutor should ever say or do anything for the purpose of helping one party or the other. I cannot imagine a plausible reason why Mueller went beyond his report and gratuitously suggested that President Trump might be guilty, except to help Democrats in Congress and to encourage impeachment talk and action. Shame on Mueller for abusing his position of trust and for allowing himself to be used for such partisan advantage.
Story cited here.
