Harvard Law School Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz described Robert Mueller’s Wednesday statement — in which the former FBI director implied that President Donald Trump might have committed obstruction of justice — as a “political gift” for “radicals” among Democrats “seeking to institute impeachment proceedings” against the president.
Dershowitz wrote at the Hill:
[Robert Mueller] went beyond the conclusion of his report and gave a political gift to Democrats in Congress who are seeking to institute impeachment proceedings against President Trump. By implying that President Trump might have committed obstruction of justice, Mueller effectively invited Democrats to institute impeachment proceedings. Obstruction of justice is a “high crime and misdemeanor” which, under the Constitution, authorizes impeachment and removal of the president.
Dershowitz previously rejected descriptions of Mueller’s conduct as partisan. He also accepted assumptions of good faith on behalf of Mueller’s ostensible investigation of claims of “the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election” but has now changed his mind about the former Obama official’s impartiality:
Obama admin first launched the investigation into Ilhan Omar’s alleged brother marriage
Ex-chief says Christa Pike was ‘almost giddy’ describing murder as governor weighs in after botched execution
Maine, Kansas Senate races neck and neck as Democrats lead in Texas, Michigan, poll shows
Lindsay Clancy’s lawyer denies she’ll testify about homicidal thoughts in ex’s suit against her doctors
What comes next for Mary Peltola as her campaign faces decoy investigation
AG Todd Blanche Calls a Spade a Spade on Alaska Dems: ‘They Are Cheating’
Alaska Governor Orders Investigation Into Alleged Dem Ballot Plot to Trick and Confuse GOP Voters
Israeli top election official orders Shin Bet to investigate allegations of foreign interference with Arab vote
Bolsonaro declares himself ‘leader’ of Brazil after fleeing country, arriving in Miami
Judge rejects DOJ request to block California from immediately counting ballots linked to alleged noncitizens
Fiance of Dem Who Lost to El-Sayed in Close Primary Announces He’s Voting For His GOP Challenger Because of Anti-Semitism, Libs Flip
Is Hasan Piker Disenfranchising Blacks? You Have To Show ID to Get Into Terror-Supporting Commie’s Events, After All
Thune goes all-in on campaign trail as Schumer stays on bench, faces rejection from fellow Dems
DHS investigates massive data breach exposing 40,000 employees, including ICE and Border Patrol agents
Haley Stevens’s Democratic fiance backs Mike Rogers, says el Sayed imperils Jewish community
Until today, I have defended Mueller against the accusations that he is a partisan. I did not believe that he personally favored either the Democrats or the Republicans, or had a point of view on whether President Trump should be impeached. But I have now changed my mind. By putting his thumb, indeed his elbow, on the scale of justice in favor of impeachment based on obstruction of justice, Mueller has revealed his partisan bias. He also has distorted the critical role of a prosecutor in our justice system. [emphasis added]
Prosecutors are not in a position to determine anyone’s guilt or innocence, noted Dershowitz, recalling the presumption of innocence and reminding readers that determinations of guilt or innocence within America’s justice system require a “full adversarial trial with a zealous defense attorney, vigorous cross examination, exclusionary rules of evidence, and other due process safeguards.”
Dershowitz assessed:
No prosecutor should ever say or do anything for the purpose of helping one party or the other. I cannot imagine a plausible reason why Mueller went beyond his report and gratuitously suggested that President Trump might be guilty, except to help Democrats in Congress and to encourage impeachment talk and action. Shame on Mueller for abusing his position of trust and for allowing himself to be used for such partisan advantage.
Story cited here.
