Harvard Law School Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz described Robert Mueller’s Wednesday statement — in which the former FBI director implied that President Donald Trump might have committed obstruction of justice — as a “political gift” for “radicals” among Democrats “seeking to institute impeachment proceedings” against the president.
Dershowitz wrote at the Hill:
[Robert Mueller] went beyond the conclusion of his report and gave a political gift to Democrats in Congress who are seeking to institute impeachment proceedings against President Trump. By implying that President Trump might have committed obstruction of justice, Mueller effectively invited Democrats to institute impeachment proceedings. Obstruction of justice is a “high crime and misdemeanor” which, under the Constitution, authorizes impeachment and removal of the president.
Dershowitz previously rejected descriptions of Mueller’s conduct as partisan. He also accepted assumptions of good faith on behalf of Mueller’s ostensible investigation of claims of “the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election” but has now changed his mind about the former Obama official’s impartiality:
Trump claims FBI deployment reduced Memphis crime as city faces potential National Guard intervention
Leftists Who Celebrated Charlie Kirk Assassination Are Being Fired At a Rapid Rate
Erika Kirk’s first speech since husband’s assassination sparks massive TPUSA chapter surge nationwide
Chris Cuomo Said He ‘Wouldn’t Be Surprised’ if Musk Gets Murdered Following Kirk Assassination
Video: Massive Crowds Turn Out for London Rally Following Death of Charlie Kirk With Some Estimates Hitting 1 Million
Alleged Kirk Assassin Had ‘Trans Partner’ He Was Living With – Partner Fully Cooperating With Authorities
Charlie Kirk’s alleged assassin lived with transgender partner who is now cooperating with FBI: Officials
Utah leaders urge unity following Charlie Kirk’s assassination: ‘Turning Point for America’
Who is Erika Kirk?: What to know about the late Charlie Kirk’s widow from their love story to his legacy
The Leadership We Need: Sec. Hegseth Says Pentagon is ‘Tracking’ Lefty Troops Celebrating Charlie Kirk’s Death Online
Another North Carolina Nightmare: Boy, 5, Shot Point Blank by Felon for Riding Bike Into Yard – Flashback
Trump praises FBI Director Kash Patel for speedy capture of Charlie Kirk assassin
‘Speak English, period’: GOP bill axes interpreter loophole in citizenship exam
Professor slammed for ‘despicable behavior’ with controverisal reposts on Charlie Kirk
Watchdogs: Child Predators May Exploit Popular Social Platform’s New Feature
Until today, I have defended Mueller against the accusations that he is a partisan. I did not believe that he personally favored either the Democrats or the Republicans, or had a point of view on whether President Trump should be impeached. But I have now changed my mind. By putting his thumb, indeed his elbow, on the scale of justice in favor of impeachment based on obstruction of justice, Mueller has revealed his partisan bias. He also has distorted the critical role of a prosecutor in our justice system. [emphasis added]
Prosecutors are not in a position to determine anyone’s guilt or innocence, noted Dershowitz, recalling the presumption of innocence and reminding readers that determinations of guilt or innocence within America’s justice system require a “full adversarial trial with a zealous defense attorney, vigorous cross examination, exclusionary rules of evidence, and other due process safeguards.”
Dershowitz assessed:
No prosecutor should ever say or do anything for the purpose of helping one party or the other. I cannot imagine a plausible reason why Mueller went beyond his report and gratuitously suggested that President Trump might be guilty, except to help Democrats in Congress and to encourage impeachment talk and action. Shame on Mueller for abusing his position of trust and for allowing himself to be used for such partisan advantage.
Story cited here.
