Harvard Law School Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz described Robert Mueller’s Wednesday statement — in which the former FBI director implied that President Donald Trump might have committed obstruction of justice — as a “political gift” for “radicals” among Democrats “seeking to institute impeachment proceedings” against the president.
Dershowitz wrote at the Hill:
[Robert Mueller] went beyond the conclusion of his report and gave a political gift to Democrats in Congress who are seeking to institute impeachment proceedings against President Trump. By implying that President Trump might have committed obstruction of justice, Mueller effectively invited Democrats to institute impeachment proceedings. Obstruction of justice is a “high crime and misdemeanor” which, under the Constitution, authorizes impeachment and removal of the president.
Dershowitz previously rejected descriptions of Mueller’s conduct as partisan. He also accepted assumptions of good faith on behalf of Mueller’s ostensible investigation of claims of “the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election” but has now changed his mind about the former Obama official’s impartiality:
Pope Leo sends unmistakable message on immigrants during visit honoring America’s first saint
Former Olympian among those charged with vandalizing Reflecting Pool; Trump says basin must be drained: report
Obama Presidential Center follows widely-mocked ‘stolen land’ acknowledgment with Native American dance show
Children among 6 wounded in Maryland mass shooting as detectives work to determine what occurred
Manhunt underway for Kansas City shooting spree suspect near World Cup venue; FBI offering $25K reward
US Park Police arrest former Olympian for vandalism of Reflecting Pool
Obama Center embeds ‘Indigenous’ land message on controversial site
Dem who sued to remove Trump’s name from Kennedy Center now says venue becoming ‘lifeless husk’ in fresh fight
Biden scores temporary court victory as Trump-appointed judge delays release of Hur investigation materials
Breaking: Iran Closes Strait of Hormuz, Threatens End to Peace Talks
Soccer Fan Accuses Israel of Killing Palestinian Team, Pathetically Falls Apart After Learning Palestinians Slaughtered Israeli Team in 1972
Trump blames ABC reporter and vandals for peeling Reflecting Pool and algae growth
Revamped Reflecting Pool Damaged by ‘Radical Left Lunatics,’ Trump Says
Texas Surges Past California in Key Sign of Business Influence
Trump says Meloni ‘wants to be friends again’ after Italy refused to help US amid Iran war
Until today, I have defended Mueller against the accusations that he is a partisan. I did not believe that he personally favored either the Democrats or the Republicans, or had a point of view on whether President Trump should be impeached. But I have now changed my mind. By putting his thumb, indeed his elbow, on the scale of justice in favor of impeachment based on obstruction of justice, Mueller has revealed his partisan bias. He also has distorted the critical role of a prosecutor in our justice system. [emphasis added]
Prosecutors are not in a position to determine anyone’s guilt or innocence, noted Dershowitz, recalling the presumption of innocence and reminding readers that determinations of guilt or innocence within America’s justice system require a “full adversarial trial with a zealous defense attorney, vigorous cross examination, exclusionary rules of evidence, and other due process safeguards.”
Dershowitz assessed:
No prosecutor should ever say or do anything for the purpose of helping one party or the other. I cannot imagine a plausible reason why Mueller went beyond his report and gratuitously suggested that President Trump might be guilty, except to help Democrats in Congress and to encourage impeachment talk and action. Shame on Mueller for abusing his position of trust and for allowing himself to be used for such partisan advantage.
Story cited here.









