Harvard Law School Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz described Robert Mueller’s Wednesday statement — in which the former FBI director implied that President Donald Trump might have committed obstruction of justice — as a “political gift” for “radicals” among Democrats “seeking to institute impeachment proceedings” against the president.
Dershowitz wrote at the Hill:
[Robert Mueller] went beyond the conclusion of his report and gave a political gift to Democrats in Congress who are seeking to institute impeachment proceedings against President Trump. By implying that President Trump might have committed obstruction of justice, Mueller effectively invited Democrats to institute impeachment proceedings. Obstruction of justice is a “high crime and misdemeanor” which, under the Constitution, authorizes impeachment and removal of the president.
Dershowitz previously rejected descriptions of Mueller’s conduct as partisan. He also accepted assumptions of good faith on behalf of Mueller’s ostensible investigation of claims of “the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election” but has now changed his mind about the former Obama official’s impartiality:
Three more alleged antifa cell members indicted on terrorism charges over Texas ICE attack
ALERT: Massive B-52 Stratofortress Has Crashed at Edwards Air Force Base – Video
Judge dismisses xAI lawsuit accusing OpenAI of stealing trade secrets
Same-name candidate disqualified from key Senate race over alleged Dem scheme to confuse voters
Mainstream Media Deceptively Twists the Truth About World Cup Star’s Jesus-Honoring Celebration
US won’t move troops despite ‘signed’ Iran deal, as doubts linger over Tehran’s next move
Austin Metcalf’s father rips former Frisco schools chief as ‘spineless’ over Karmelo Anthony graduation
Trump plans to ‘focus’ on ending Russia-Ukraine war following peace deal with Iran
Ivy League student investigated after alleged antisemitic internship rejection: ‘Not working for a Jew’
Left-wing distraction of Trump’s UFC event falls flat as bitter celebrities mocked online
Christian Players for SF Giants Take Bold, Visible Stand Against ‘Pride Month’ and the LGBT Crowd’s Theft of the Rainbow
WATCH: Shane Gillis rejects UFC fighter’s crude Michelle Obama jab after White House win
Watch: UFC Winner Says ‘Michelle Obama Is a Man!’ at White House Following Victory
Jim Acosta ruthlessly mocked for comparing removal of Trump’s name from Kennedy Center to fall of Berlin Wall
Haitian fraudster’s eye-popping taxpayer-backed drug scam puts Congress on the hunt
Until today, I have defended Mueller against the accusations that he is a partisan. I did not believe that he personally favored either the Democrats or the Republicans, or had a point of view on whether President Trump should be impeached. But I have now changed my mind. By putting his thumb, indeed his elbow, on the scale of justice in favor of impeachment based on obstruction of justice, Mueller has revealed his partisan bias. He also has distorted the critical role of a prosecutor in our justice system. [emphasis added]
Prosecutors are not in a position to determine anyone’s guilt or innocence, noted Dershowitz, recalling the presumption of innocence and reminding readers that determinations of guilt or innocence within America’s justice system require a “full adversarial trial with a zealous defense attorney, vigorous cross examination, exclusionary rules of evidence, and other due process safeguards.”
Dershowitz assessed:
No prosecutor should ever say or do anything for the purpose of helping one party or the other. I cannot imagine a plausible reason why Mueller went beyond his report and gratuitously suggested that President Trump might be guilty, except to help Democrats in Congress and to encourage impeachment talk and action. Shame on Mueller for abusing his position of trust and for allowing himself to be used for such partisan advantage.
Story cited here.
