Harvard Law School Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz described Robert Mueller’s Wednesday statement — in which the former FBI director implied that President Donald Trump might have committed obstruction of justice — as a “political gift” for “radicals” among Democrats “seeking to institute impeachment proceedings” against the president.
Dershowitz wrote at the Hill:
[Robert Mueller] went beyond the conclusion of his report and gave a political gift to Democrats in Congress who are seeking to institute impeachment proceedings against President Trump. By implying that President Trump might have committed obstruction of justice, Mueller effectively invited Democrats to institute impeachment proceedings. Obstruction of justice is a “high crime and misdemeanor” which, under the Constitution, authorizes impeachment and removal of the president.
Dershowitz previously rejected descriptions of Mueller’s conduct as partisan. He also accepted assumptions of good faith on behalf of Mueller’s ostensible investigation of claims of “the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election” but has now changed his mind about the former Obama official’s impartiality:
Trump compares real wages under his admin versus Biden’s during speech calling out Dem affordability ‘hoax’
Trump gives update on wounded National Guard member 2 weeks after DC ambush shooting: ‘He got up from bed’
American skydivers reclaim world record from Libya with massive flag jump on Pearl Harbor Day
Twin Blue-State Punks Meet SWAT Justice After Threatening Medieval Torture, Then Murder of DHS Asst. Dir. Tricia McLaughlin
Plane crash-lands on top of Toyota on Florida freeway following engine trouble
McDonald’s Pulls Unsettling Christmas Commercial After it Sparks Massive Backlash
Federal appeals court lets Pentagon reinstate transgender service ban, says judge overstepped military leaders
Expert reveals key factor that led to massive Minnesota fraud scheme
ABC Signs Jimmy Kimmel to a New Deal Months After Affiliate Revolt
Gene Simmons gives Alex Padilla’s son music career advice: ‘Have a fall back position’
Watch: David Spade Roasts Mall That Refused to Say ‘Christmas,’ Calls Out Rampant Christian Persecution
European talks reshape Ukraine’s peace plan as Zelenskyy refuses territorial concessions
Trump’s approval climbs as Republicans rally behind president’s affordability agenda: poll
Luigi Mangione said ‘all these people here for a mass murder, why?’ at arraignment: police officer
New Jersey twins arrested for threatening to kill DHS spokeswoman and ICE officers
Until today, I have defended Mueller against the accusations that he is a partisan. I did not believe that he personally favored either the Democrats or the Republicans, or had a point of view on whether President Trump should be impeached. But I have now changed my mind. By putting his thumb, indeed his elbow, on the scale of justice in favor of impeachment based on obstruction of justice, Mueller has revealed his partisan bias. He also has distorted the critical role of a prosecutor in our justice system. [emphasis added]
Prosecutors are not in a position to determine anyone’s guilt or innocence, noted Dershowitz, recalling the presumption of innocence and reminding readers that determinations of guilt or innocence within America’s justice system require a “full adversarial trial with a zealous defense attorney, vigorous cross examination, exclusionary rules of evidence, and other due process safeguards.”
Dershowitz assessed:
No prosecutor should ever say or do anything for the purpose of helping one party or the other. I cannot imagine a plausible reason why Mueller went beyond his report and gratuitously suggested that President Trump might be guilty, except to help Democrats in Congress and to encourage impeachment talk and action. Shame on Mueller for abusing his position of trust and for allowing himself to be used for such partisan advantage.
Story cited here.
