Harvard Law School Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz described Robert Mueller’s Wednesday statement — in which the former FBI director implied that President Donald Trump might have committed obstruction of justice — as a “political gift” for “radicals” among Democrats “seeking to institute impeachment proceedings” against the president.
Dershowitz wrote at the Hill:
[Robert Mueller] went beyond the conclusion of his report and gave a political gift to Democrats in Congress who are seeking to institute impeachment proceedings against President Trump. By implying that President Trump might have committed obstruction of justice, Mueller effectively invited Democrats to institute impeachment proceedings. Obstruction of justice is a “high crime and misdemeanor” which, under the Constitution, authorizes impeachment and removal of the president.
Dershowitz previously rejected descriptions of Mueller’s conduct as partisan. He also accepted assumptions of good faith on behalf of Mueller’s ostensible investigation of claims of “the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election” but has now changed his mind about the former Obama official’s impartiality:
Iranian sleeper cells may be hiding ‘in plain sight’ waiting to target rural US areas, terrorism expert warns
Camp flooding puts parents on edge as tragedy shows danger of sending kids away for summer
Why Trump’s undeniable winning streak is drawing a barrage of negative coverage
Family-owned Texas restaurant works to feed first responders: ‘We’re thankful for them’
Illegal immigrant killer of Laken Riley wins unexpected court victory for mental evaluation
Andrew Yang ‘in touch’ with Musk over America Party: ‘Happy to help’
Elon Musk connects with indie Andrew Yang on billionaire former Trump ally’s third party push
Israeli prime minister answers whether he is worried about being jailed in NYC by Zohran Mamdani
Federal judge pauses Trump administration’s Planned Parenthood defunding measure
Netanyahu surprises Trump with formal Nobel Peace Prize nomination during historic White House meeting
Navy’s carrier fleet faces temporary reduction through 2027 as new ships hit development snags
‘A Depraved Lie’: White House Fires Back After Schumer, Dems Push Disgusting Smears
NYC’s Campaign Finance Board Is Tipping the Scales in Favor of Mamdani in a Big Way
Some wealthy New York elites surprisingly back NYC socialist candidate who wants to tax them more
Suspect in Border Patrol Ambush Identified – Strange Writing Found on His Car
Until today, I have defended Mueller against the accusations that he is a partisan. I did not believe that he personally favored either the Democrats or the Republicans, or had a point of view on whether President Trump should be impeached. But I have now changed my mind. By putting his thumb, indeed his elbow, on the scale of justice in favor of impeachment based on obstruction of justice, Mueller has revealed his partisan bias. He also has distorted the critical role of a prosecutor in our justice system. [emphasis added]
Prosecutors are not in a position to determine anyone’s guilt or innocence, noted Dershowitz, recalling the presumption of innocence and reminding readers that determinations of guilt or innocence within America’s justice system require a “full adversarial trial with a zealous defense attorney, vigorous cross examination, exclusionary rules of evidence, and other due process safeguards.”
Dershowitz assessed:
No prosecutor should ever say or do anything for the purpose of helping one party or the other. I cannot imagine a plausible reason why Mueller went beyond his report and gratuitously suggested that President Trump might be guilty, except to help Democrats in Congress and to encourage impeachment talk and action. Shame on Mueller for abusing his position of trust and for allowing himself to be used for such partisan advantage.
Story cited here.
