Attorney General William Barr reportedly disagrees with a finding by the forthcoming Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General (IG) report that the FBI had sufficient reason to monitor the Trump campaign in 2016.
The FBI conducted surveillance on Trump campaign associates, including foreign policy aide Carter Page, on the basis of suspicions that the campaign might have been colluding with Russia to interfere with the 2016 election.
No evidence of collusion was ever found, though the surveillance continued well after the election, and the fact that the FBI was investigating the Trump campaign over Russia was leaked to Democrats and to the mainstream media.
The IG report is expected to criticize the FBI for the way in which it approached the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court to obtain a warrant for that surveillance. The FBI partly relied upon the so-called “dossier” prepared by former British spy Christopher Steele for Fusion GPS, an opposition research company being paid by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee. Republicans have claimed that the FBI failed to corroborate the unproven allegations in the dossier, and hid its political origins from the FISA court.
NYPD cop’s killer convicted of manslaughter, not guilty of murder after split jury ordered to deliberate more
Sham Philadelphia coffee shop hiding crack operation busted in sweeping raid, 17 arrested: AG
FBI investigated former Capitol Police officer in Jan. 6 pipe bomb case, filings say
Illegal Alien Charged with Murdering 3-Month-Old Infant
Listen: Ketanji Brown Jackson Sparks Derision During Supreme Court Oral Arguments with Bizarre Tangent About Stealing Wallets
Trump administration makes major move to relieve ‘unfair burden’ on DHS workers as shutdown drags on
WATCH: Robert De Niro brushes off ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’ label hurled by critics
Fox News Poll: Broad anxiety about AI doesn’t extend to jobs
Trump’s address to the nation: Burning questions on Iran, the Strait of Hormuz, and NATO
Mike Johnson panned for ‘caving’ to John Thune in potential DHS shutdown offramp
NATO Was Built for a World That No Longer Exists – It’s Time for America to Act Accordingly
Artemis II vs. Apollo: Why this mission loops the moon but doesn’t land
Trump Fires Off Heated Message After Walking Out of Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Sauer cites ‘striking’ figures on secretive birth tourism in high-stakes SCOTUS case
Trump highlights ‘day of prayer’ at National Mall next month with faith leaders
But there have been conflicting leaks about what the report, which is set to be released next Monday, will say about misconduct at the FBI. Several individuals have already seen drafts of the report, as they are mentioned in it.
The Washington Post reported Monday evening that IG Michael Horowitz, an Obama administration appointee, had concluded that there was, in fact, sufficient evidence to justify what Barr earlier called “spying” on the campaign.
Barr reportedly disagreed, though a spokesperson for the DOJ dismissed reports of a dispute between Barr and Horowitz: “Rather than speculating, people should read the report for themselves next week,” she said.
Horowitz was criticized for his 2018 report on how the FBI handled the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s illicit email server, in which he found that officials mishandled the investigation but that political bias was not the reason.
Story cited here.
