Attorney General William Barr reportedly disagrees with a finding by the forthcoming Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General (IG) report that the FBI had sufficient reason to monitor the Trump campaign in 2016.
The FBI conducted surveillance on Trump campaign associates, including foreign policy aide Carter Page, on the basis of suspicions that the campaign might have been colluding with Russia to interfere with the 2016 election.
No evidence of collusion was ever found, though the surveillance continued well after the election, and the fact that the FBI was investigating the Trump campaign over Russia was leaked to Democrats and to the mainstream media.
The IG report is expected to criticize the FBI for the way in which it approached the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court to obtain a warrant for that surveillance. The FBI partly relied upon the so-called “dossier” prepared by former British spy Christopher Steele for Fusion GPS, an opposition research company being paid by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee. Republicans have claimed that the FBI failed to corroborate the unproven allegations in the dossier, and hid its political origins from the FISA court.
Abdul El-Sayed touts ‘whole a–’ medical credentials while defending sex changes for children
Any ‘Iran Deal’ Must Include Justice for American Victims of State-Sponsored Terrorism
Liberal Donors, Corporate Interests Conspire to Help Left-Leaning Republicans in Deep Red Wyoming
White House unloads on violent ‘criminal alien’ nabbed after investigators uncover election offense
NBC beefs up security at ‘Today’ studio after Nancy Guthrie kidnapping, intruder incident
What does ‘Never Forget’ mean for a generation with no memory of 9/11?
If the US cuts funding to Israel, could Jordan and Egypt be next?
Have the Left and Right switched places on globalization and consumerism?
PBS’s ‘Marble Hall Murders’ features lovely locales, artful acting, and transfixing twists
Trump says he would ‘love’ to see Ireland unified as one nation
New York City Council pushes bill to take press passes away from ‘Mangionistas’
Newsom concedes California’s housing crisis is fair criticism
‘Disgusting Excuse for a Journalist’: NBC Boston Ripped to Shreds Over Hit Piece on Clancy Holdout Juror
We Didn’t Get This Angry Because Americans Changed: We Got This Angry Because Washington Did
Fox News Legal Analyst Jonathan Turley Thoroughly Dismantles Lindsay Clancy’s Attorney After Debate Challenge
But there have been conflicting leaks about what the report, which is set to be released next Monday, will say about misconduct at the FBI. Several individuals have already seen drafts of the report, as they are mentioned in it.
The Washington Post reported Monday evening that IG Michael Horowitz, an Obama administration appointee, had concluded that there was, in fact, sufficient evidence to justify what Barr earlier called “spying” on the campaign.
Barr reportedly disagreed, though a spokesperson for the DOJ dismissed reports of a dispute between Barr and Horowitz: “Rather than speculating, people should read the report for themselves next week,” she said.
Horowitz was criticized for his 2018 report on how the FBI handled the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s illicit email server, in which he found that officials mishandled the investigation but that political bias was not the reason.
Story cited here.
