House Intelligence Committee chairman Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) is giving members of his committee just 24 hours to read and sign off on his report recommending articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump.
As Breitbart News reported Friday, House Judiciary Committee chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler has previewed the report, and suggested it will include claims of “collusion” with Russia — as well as Ukraine, Russia’s enemy.
And as reported Saturday, Schiff will provide the full report to committee members on Monday, who must sign off on Tuesday in time for the first hearing in Nadler’s committee on Wednesday, which will discuss the supposed constitutional and legal basis for impeachment.
It is a foregone conclusion that Democrats will sign off on Schiff’s report. Evidence does not seem to be the top priority for Democrats: a majority favored an impeachment inquiry by August 1, eleven days before the so-called “whistleblower” sent a letter to Schiff complaining about Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky.
Alex Murdaugh’s lawyers withdraw request for civilian clothes, accuse prosecutors of creating a ‘spectacle’
Rashida Tlaib Defends Antifa Member Sentenced to 100 Years for Attempted Assassination, Calls Punishment ‘a Travesty and Totally Unjustified’
Watch: Sophie Cunningham’s Death Stare Went Super Viral as She Considered Smashing Heads to Defend Caitlin Clark
Colorado mom allegedly bought alcohol daily for 16-year-old daughter found dead with 173 empty bottles
WATCH: AOC won’t rule out Senate bid after New York progressives notch primary wins: ‘Inspired and encouraged’
Chinese drone monopoly put on notice amid concerns over CCP spying: ‘Strategic mistake’
Reporter’s Notebook: Lawmakers wrestle over whether AI can make the grade in America’s classrooms
Usha Vance Mocks New York Times After Outlet Gets Weird About Her Maternity Outfit
Supreme Court Delivers Big 2nd Amendment Win, Striking Down Restrictive Concealed Carry Law
WATCH: Hearing derails as purple-haired Dem points finger, screams at chair to put DHS chief ‘in his place’
USPS wouldn’t deliver ballots in states that refuse to fork over mail-in voter info under proposed rule
Supreme Court hands Trump two major immigration victories
FBI joins probe into ‘Free Karmelo’ mob that allegedly beat woman while chanting support for killer: police
Watch: Alan Dershowitz Reveals the Sickest Public Part of Bill Gates’ Friendship With Epstein – Says ‘There’s a Smell’ to Gates’ Testimony Prep
Nancy Guthrie ransom notes don’t match suspect’s behavior, profiler says: ‘I don’t believe they’re real’
However, as the Washington Examiner‘s Byron York has noted, Democrats are in such a rush that they are leaving potential facts out of their examination. For example, they could wage a court battle to force former National Security Adviser John Bolton to testify.
Bolton reportedly disapproved of the role played by U.S. Ambassador to the E.U. Gordon Sondland and Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani in relations with Ukraine. He could be a key witness. However, Democrats did not want to wait to hear what he had to say.
As York noted recently in a column titled “Why the rush toward impeachment?”, Democrats “are racing to get the job done by Christmas. They’re not even trying to hear from some key witnesses, like former national security adviser John Bolton, because they don’t want to take the time to go to court over it.”
York notes that Democrats are fearful of letting impeachment drag into the 2020 presidential primary, when it will pull several U.S. Senators off the campaign trail. And they are also worried about the fact that public support for impeachment is stagnant at best, and slipping at worst, after lackluster public hearings last month.
But the rush has been a feature from the very beginning. On the day that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced an impeachment inquiry, the president had already announced that he had declassified the transcript (or “readout”) of the phone call with Zelensky, and that it would be published the next day.
Alex Murdaugh’s lawyers withdraw request for civilian clothes, accuse prosecutors of creating a ‘spectacle’
Rashida Tlaib Defends Antifa Member Sentenced to 100 Years for Attempted Assassination, Calls Punishment ‘a Travesty and Totally Unjustified’
Watch: Sophie Cunningham’s Death Stare Went Super Viral as She Considered Smashing Heads to Defend Caitlin Clark
Colorado mom allegedly bought alcohol daily for 16-year-old daughter found dead with 173 empty bottles
WATCH: AOC won’t rule out Senate bid after New York progressives notch primary wins: ‘Inspired and encouraged’
Chinese drone monopoly put on notice amid concerns over CCP spying: ‘Strategic mistake’
Reporter’s Notebook: Lawmakers wrestle over whether AI can make the grade in America’s classrooms
Usha Vance Mocks New York Times After Outlet Gets Weird About Her Maternity Outfit
Supreme Court Delivers Big 2nd Amendment Win, Striking Down Restrictive Concealed Carry Law
WATCH: Hearing derails as purple-haired Dem points finger, screams at chair to put DHS chief ‘in his place’
USPS wouldn’t deliver ballots in states that refuse to fork over mail-in voter info under proposed rule
Supreme Court hands Trump two major immigration victories
FBI joins probe into ‘Free Karmelo’ mob that allegedly beat woman while chanting support for killer: police
Watch: Alan Dershowitz Reveals the Sickest Public Part of Bill Gates’ Friendship With Epstein – Says ‘There’s a Smell’ to Gates’ Testimony Prep
Nancy Guthrie ransom notes don’t match suspect’s behavior, profiler says: ‘I don’t believe they’re real’
Pelosi did not want to wait for the evidence: her decision was driven by political factors.
Likewise, the Intelligence Committee has rushed its proceedings before all of the evidence was available to most members of Congress, or the public. It often published lengthy transcripts of closed-door depositions on the eve of public hearings, and only released the most exculpatory transcript after public hearings were over.
Nadler has given Trump until Friday to respond to a request to participate, either directly or through his counsel, in the Judiciary Committee’s impeachment proceedings.
Story cited here.
