News • Opinons • Politics

Adam Schiff Gives Democrats Only 24 Hours to Sign Impeachment Report

House Intelligence Committee chairman Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) is giving members of his committee just 24 hours to read and sign off on his report recommending articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump.

As Breitbart News reported Friday, House Judiciary Committee chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler has previewed the report, and suggested it will include claims of “collusion” with Russia — as well as Ukraine, Russia’s enemy.

And as reported Saturday, Schiff will provide the full report to committee members on Monday, who must sign off on Tuesday in time for the first hearing in Nadler’s committee on Wednesday, which will discuss the supposed constitutional and legal basis for impeachment.


It is a foregone conclusion that Democrats will sign off on Schiff’s report. Evidence does not seem to be the top priority for Democrats: a majority favored an impeachment inquiry by August 1, eleven days before the so-called “whistleblower” sent a letter to Schiff complaining about Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky.


Kansas Senate rivals distance themselves from party leaders in fiery debate
Omar Wouldn’t Say For Sure Her Ex-Husband Wasn’t Her Brother: ‘Not to My Knowledge’
Mass firings vow sparks clash with Klobuchar over Walz fraud legacy
Trump warns Democrats ‘want to burn it all down’ in South Carolina pitch
Abdul el Sayed, Mike Rogers clash over MAGA, Muslim Brotherhood in final Michigan Senate debate
Florida attorney accused of threatening to shoot ICE agents while trying to buy gun
Is ‘Ilhan Omar’ a Fake Name? New Court Filing Identifying Omar’s Alias Has Americans Questioning Her Real Name
El-Sayed erupts at GOP rival over Muslim Brotherhood accusations in fiery Senate debate
California Driver Crashed While Watching X-Rated Content – Police Say She Killed a Retired Sunday School Teacher
DOJ urged to investigate Slotkin over threats to young professionals seeking work in Trump administration
Retired NYPD detective charged with murder in George Washington Bridge shooting of Con Ed worker: officials
France in flames is preview of what ‘DSA’ Democrats want for US, senator warns
Popular Food Delivery App Will Pay Millions After DOJ Says American Gig Workers Were Discriminated Against
Records Show Minnesota’s Democratic Senate Nominee Peggy Flanagan Lied About Her Past: Report
US pulls personnel from Saudi Arabia as kingdom comes under Houthi fire

See also  When purity politics runs its course: Even the most strident DSA politicians must learn to compromise

However, as the Washington Examiner‘s Byron York has noted, Democrats are in such a rush that they are leaving potential facts out of their examination. For example, they could wage a court battle to force former National Security Adviser John Bolton to testify.

Bolton reportedly disapproved of the role played by U.S. Ambassador to the E.U. Gordon Sondland and Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani in relations with Ukraine. He could be a key witness. However, Democrats did not want to wait to hear what he had to say.

As York noted recently in a column titled “Why the rush toward impeachment?”, Democrats “are racing to get the job done by Christmas. They’re not even trying to hear from some key witnesses, like former national security adviser John Bolton, because they don’t want to take the time to go to court over it.”

York notes that Democrats are fearful of letting impeachment drag into the 2020 presidential primary, when it will pull several U.S. Senators off the campaign trail. And they are also worried about the fact that public support for impeachment is stagnant at best, and slipping at worst, after lackluster public hearings last month.

But the rush has been a feature from the very beginning. On the day that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced an impeachment inquiry, the president had already announced that he had declassified the transcript (or “readout”) of the phone call with Zelensky, and that it would be published the next day.

See also  When purity politics runs its course: Even the most strident DSA politicians must learn to compromise


Kansas Senate rivals distance themselves from party leaders in fiery debate
Omar Wouldn’t Say For Sure Her Ex-Husband Wasn’t Her Brother: ‘Not to My Knowledge’
Mass firings vow sparks clash with Klobuchar over Walz fraud legacy
Trump warns Democrats ‘want to burn it all down’ in South Carolina pitch
Abdul el Sayed, Mike Rogers clash over MAGA, Muslim Brotherhood in final Michigan Senate debate
Florida attorney accused of threatening to shoot ICE agents while trying to buy gun
Is ‘Ilhan Omar’ a Fake Name? New Court Filing Identifying Omar’s Alias Has Americans Questioning Her Real Name
El-Sayed erupts at GOP rival over Muslim Brotherhood accusations in fiery Senate debate
California Driver Crashed While Watching X-Rated Content – Police Say She Killed a Retired Sunday School Teacher
DOJ urged to investigate Slotkin over threats to young professionals seeking work in Trump administration
Retired NYPD detective charged with murder in George Washington Bridge shooting of Con Ed worker: officials
France in flames is preview of what ‘DSA’ Democrats want for US, senator warns
Popular Food Delivery App Will Pay Millions After DOJ Says American Gig Workers Were Discriminated Against
Records Show Minnesota’s Democratic Senate Nominee Peggy Flanagan Lied About Her Past: Report
US pulls personnel from Saudi Arabia as kingdom comes under Houthi fire

Pelosi did not want to wait for the evidence: her decision was driven by political factors.

See also  When purity politics runs its course: Even the most strident DSA politicians must learn to compromise

Likewise, the Intelligence Committee has rushed its proceedings before all of the evidence was available to most members of Congress, or the public. It often published lengthy transcripts of closed-door depositions on the eve of public hearings, and only released the most exculpatory transcript after public hearings were over.

Nadler has given Trump until Friday to respond to a request to participate, either directly or through his counsel, in the Judiciary Committee’s impeachment proceedings.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter


Discover more from ConservativeModern.com

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading