House Intelligence Committee chairman Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) is giving members of his committee just 24 hours to read and sign off on his report recommending articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump.
As Breitbart News reported Friday, House Judiciary Committee chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler has previewed the report, and suggested it will include claims of “collusion” with Russia — as well as Ukraine, Russia’s enemy.
And as reported Saturday, Schiff will provide the full report to committee members on Monday, who must sign off on Tuesday in time for the first hearing in Nadler’s committee on Wednesday, which will discuss the supposed constitutional and legal basis for impeachment.
It is a foregone conclusion that Democrats will sign off on Schiff’s report. Evidence does not seem to be the top priority for Democrats: a majority favored an impeachment inquiry by August 1, eleven days before the so-called “whistleblower” sent a letter to Schiff complaining about Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky.
Kentucky man charged with boating under the influence after female passenger, 19, goes missing
Are You Gay Enough To Get A California Utilities Contract? Here’s The Test
How a Ministry Is Spreading Christianity in Iran Using AI
Women accuse Pearadise founder of preying on them by turning ‘safe space’ into mansion of manipulation
NY governor hopeful vows showdown with Mamdani over socialist agenda: ‘I will stop him’
Firefighter brother of 9/11 victim incensed by ‘radical’ Muslims winning key Dem primaries
Trump-backed Letlow takes on John Fleming in runoff to replace Bill Cassidy
Incoming socialist DC mayor has a weak hand against Trump administration
People On Food Stamps Can Keep Buying Junk With Your Tax Dollars, Obama Judge Rules
Lawyer who beat Hawaii gun law calls state’s reliance on Black Code ‘disgraceful’
American Woman in Mexico Convicted for Drugging and Killing Men She Met on Dating Apps
Review: We’re all too old for the new ‘Toy Story’
Trump’s endorsement power faces new test in Louisiana Republican Senate showdown
Minnesota man captured in Somalia after allegedly helping orchestrate $250M child nutrition fraud scheme
New Mexico AG launches criminal investigation into DEA over allegations agents let fentanyl flood state
However, as the Washington Examiner‘s Byron York has noted, Democrats are in such a rush that they are leaving potential facts out of their examination. For example, they could wage a court battle to force former National Security Adviser John Bolton to testify.
Bolton reportedly disapproved of the role played by U.S. Ambassador to the E.U. Gordon Sondland and Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani in relations with Ukraine. He could be a key witness. However, Democrats did not want to wait to hear what he had to say.
As York noted recently in a column titled “Why the rush toward impeachment?”, Democrats “are racing to get the job done by Christmas. They’re not even trying to hear from some key witnesses, like former national security adviser John Bolton, because they don’t want to take the time to go to court over it.”
York notes that Democrats are fearful of letting impeachment drag into the 2020 presidential primary, when it will pull several U.S. Senators off the campaign trail. And they are also worried about the fact that public support for impeachment is stagnant at best, and slipping at worst, after lackluster public hearings last month.
But the rush has been a feature from the very beginning. On the day that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced an impeachment inquiry, the president had already announced that he had declassified the transcript (or “readout”) of the phone call with Zelensky, and that it would be published the next day.
Kentucky man charged with boating under the influence after female passenger, 19, goes missing
Are You Gay Enough To Get A California Utilities Contract? Here’s The Test
How a Ministry Is Spreading Christianity in Iran Using AI
Women accuse Pearadise founder of preying on them by turning ‘safe space’ into mansion of manipulation
NY governor hopeful vows showdown with Mamdani over socialist agenda: ‘I will stop him’
Firefighter brother of 9/11 victim incensed by ‘radical’ Muslims winning key Dem primaries
Trump-backed Letlow takes on John Fleming in runoff to replace Bill Cassidy
Incoming socialist DC mayor has a weak hand against Trump administration
People On Food Stamps Can Keep Buying Junk With Your Tax Dollars, Obama Judge Rules
Lawyer who beat Hawaii gun law calls state’s reliance on Black Code ‘disgraceful’
American Woman in Mexico Convicted for Drugging and Killing Men She Met on Dating Apps
Review: We’re all too old for the new ‘Toy Story’
Trump’s endorsement power faces new test in Louisiana Republican Senate showdown
Minnesota man captured in Somalia after allegedly helping orchestrate $250M child nutrition fraud scheme
New Mexico AG launches criminal investigation into DEA over allegations agents let fentanyl flood state
Pelosi did not want to wait for the evidence: her decision was driven by political factors.
Likewise, the Intelligence Committee has rushed its proceedings before all of the evidence was available to most members of Congress, or the public. It often published lengthy transcripts of closed-door depositions on the eve of public hearings, and only released the most exculpatory transcript after public hearings were over.
Nadler has given Trump until Friday to respond to a request to participate, either directly or through his counsel, in the Judiciary Committee’s impeachment proceedings.
Story cited here.
