News Opinons Politics

Adam Schiff Gives Democrats Only 24 Hours to Sign Impeachment Report

House Intelligence Committee chairman Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) is giving members of his committee just 24 hours to read and sign off on his report recommending articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump.

As Breitbart News reported Friday, House Judiciary Committee chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler has previewed the report, and suggested it will include claims of “collusion” with Russia — as well as Ukraine, Russia’s enemy.

And as reported Saturday, Schiff will provide the full report to committee members on Monday, who must sign off on Tuesday in time for the first hearing in Nadler’s committee on Wednesday, which will discuss the supposed constitutional and legal basis for impeachment.


It is a foregone conclusion that Democrats will sign off on Schiff’s report. Evidence does not seem to be the top priority for Democrats: a majority favored an impeachment inquiry by August 1, eleven days before the so-called “whistleblower” sent a letter to Schiff complaining about Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky.


Internet Demands Probe After Mitch McConnell’s Wife Reportedly Revealed to Have CCP Ties
Kentucky Ostrich Farm Offers Alternative for People Allergic to Red Meat After Tick Bites: ‘Similar to Steak’
Beauty school moms caught in accreditation crossfire as Trump admin weighs consequential decision
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announces distribution of more than 7 million free eggs statewide
Amy Acton cried on the job, once found ‘curled up’ on floor before COVID meeting during tenure as Ohio health official: Staffers
RNC leaves convention seat empty for Charlie Kirk one year after assassination
Lindsay Clancy juror who backed the defense also publicly cheered Karen Read’s acquittal
Florida woman accused of DUI crashes SUV into parked car, then makes bizarre plea to police caught on camera
White House stays quiet as UK leads 11 other countries with sanctions on Israeli ‘settler terrorists’
Trump Signs Orders to Block Certain Canadian Products from Being Sold in the U.S.
Anthropic Researchers Say AI Could ‘Kill All Humans’ Within Next Decade
Emergency slide sparks questions on Trump’s new Air Force One before president reveals why
‘Alien harboring’ accusations fly as DC-area county spends taxpayer funds to blunt ICE
Report: Jimmy Kimmel’s Current Season Will Be His Last at ABC
Merz accuses AfD of ‘ethnic cleansing’ agenda, postpones call with Trump after president praises party

See also  Kansas Republicans buck Trump over threat to blacklist Canadian jets

However, as the Washington Examiner‘s Byron York has noted, Democrats are in such a rush that they are leaving potential facts out of their examination. For example, they could wage a court battle to force former National Security Adviser John Bolton to testify.

Bolton reportedly disapproved of the role played by U.S. Ambassador to the E.U. Gordon Sondland and Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani in relations with Ukraine. He could be a key witness. However, Democrats did not want to wait to hear what he had to say.

As York noted recently in a column titled “Why the rush toward impeachment?”, Democrats “are racing to get the job done by Christmas. They’re not even trying to hear from some key witnesses, like former national security adviser John Bolton, because they don’t want to take the time to go to court over it.”

York notes that Democrats are fearful of letting impeachment drag into the 2020 presidential primary, when it will pull several U.S. Senators off the campaign trail. And they are also worried about the fact that public support for impeachment is stagnant at best, and slipping at worst, after lackluster public hearings last month.

But the rush has been a feature from the very beginning. On the day that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced an impeachment inquiry, the president had already announced that he had declassified the transcript (or “readout”) of the phone call with Zelensky, and that it would be published the next day.

See also  Maria Bartiromo no longer with Fox News


Internet Demands Probe After Mitch McConnell’s Wife Reportedly Revealed to Have CCP Ties
Kentucky Ostrich Farm Offers Alternative for People Allergic to Red Meat After Tick Bites: ‘Similar to Steak’
Beauty school moms caught in accreditation crossfire as Trump admin weighs consequential decision
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announces distribution of more than 7 million free eggs statewide
Amy Acton cried on the job, once found ‘curled up’ on floor before COVID meeting during tenure as Ohio health official: Staffers
RNC leaves convention seat empty for Charlie Kirk one year after assassination
Lindsay Clancy juror who backed the defense also publicly cheered Karen Read’s acquittal
Florida woman accused of DUI crashes SUV into parked car, then makes bizarre plea to police caught on camera
White House stays quiet as UK leads 11 other countries with sanctions on Israeli ‘settler terrorists’
Trump Signs Orders to Block Certain Canadian Products from Being Sold in the U.S.
Anthropic Researchers Say AI Could ‘Kill All Humans’ Within Next Decade
Emergency slide sparks questions on Trump’s new Air Force One before president reveals why
‘Alien harboring’ accusations fly as DC-area county spends taxpayer funds to blunt ICE
Report: Jimmy Kimmel’s Current Season Will Be His Last at ABC
Merz accuses AfD of ‘ethnic cleansing’ agenda, postpones call with Trump after president praises party

Pelosi did not want to wait for the evidence: her decision was driven by political factors.

See also  Gloria Steinem, outspoken feminist leader, dies at 92

Likewise, the Intelligence Committee has rushed its proceedings before all of the evidence was available to most members of Congress, or the public. It often published lengthy transcripts of closed-door depositions on the eve of public hearings, and only released the most exculpatory transcript after public hearings were over.

Nadler has given Trump until Friday to respond to a request to participate, either directly or through his counsel, in the Judiciary Committee’s impeachment proceedings.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter