House Intelligence Committee chairman Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) is giving members of his committee just 24 hours to read and sign off on his report recommending articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump.
As Breitbart News reported Friday, House Judiciary Committee chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler has previewed the report, and suggested it will include claims of “collusion” with Russia — as well as Ukraine, Russia’s enemy.
And as reported Saturday, Schiff will provide the full report to committee members on Monday, who must sign off on Tuesday in time for the first hearing in Nadler’s committee on Wednesday, which will discuss the supposed constitutional and legal basis for impeachment.
It is a foregone conclusion that Democrats will sign off on Schiff’s report. Evidence does not seem to be the top priority for Democrats: a majority favored an impeachment inquiry by August 1, eleven days before the so-called “whistleblower” sent a letter to Schiff complaining about Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky.
Some Democrats pledge to get rid of funds donated by Swalwell’s leadership PAC, others remain silent
Trump gets McDonalds delivered by ‘DoorDash grandma’ to tout tax refunds
Federal Judge Throws Out Trump’s Epstein Birthday Letter Lawsuit – But the Fight Isn’t Over Yet
Whistleblower contacted Democrats before filing Trump complaint that led to first impeachment, records show
Obama CIA chief under DOJ scrutiny pushes fringe Trump ouster plan
Soros-backed prosecutor set for Capitol Hill grilling as sanctuary policies face reckoning
Trump-Impeaching GOP Senator Reportedly Melted Down Over Not Getting Enough Money
Gubernatorial candidate vows to pardon cop convicted of manslaughter in death of fleeing suspect
Bodies of two iron workers recovered from rubble of Philadelphia parking garage 5 days after partial collapse
Tennessee Lawmakers Walk Out of Prayer Against ‘White Christian Nationalism’
Trump’s ‘Blasphemous’ Post Draws Backlash from Christian Conservatives
The simple tax habit that could save you thousands over your lifetime
Lawmakers put expulsion threats atop House agenda as return sets up high-stakes week
Cancer-Stricken Former Republican Sen. Ben Sasse Vows To Avoid Being A ‘Pansy A**’ As Life Slips Away
Melania Trump’s Epstein remarks turn up the heat on DOJ, Acting AG Todd Blanche to do more
However, as the Washington Examiner‘s Byron York has noted, Democrats are in such a rush that they are leaving potential facts out of their examination. For example, they could wage a court battle to force former National Security Adviser John Bolton to testify.
Bolton reportedly disapproved of the role played by U.S. Ambassador to the E.U. Gordon Sondland and Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani in relations with Ukraine. He could be a key witness. However, Democrats did not want to wait to hear what he had to say.
As York noted recently in a column titled “Why the rush toward impeachment?”, Democrats “are racing to get the job done by Christmas. They’re not even trying to hear from some key witnesses, like former national security adviser John Bolton, because they don’t want to take the time to go to court over it.”
York notes that Democrats are fearful of letting impeachment drag into the 2020 presidential primary, when it will pull several U.S. Senators off the campaign trail. And they are also worried about the fact that public support for impeachment is stagnant at best, and slipping at worst, after lackluster public hearings last month.
But the rush has been a feature from the very beginning. On the day that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced an impeachment inquiry, the president had already announced that he had declassified the transcript (or “readout”) of the phone call with Zelensky, and that it would be published the next day.
Some Democrats pledge to get rid of funds donated by Swalwell’s leadership PAC, others remain silent
Trump gets McDonalds delivered by ‘DoorDash grandma’ to tout tax refunds
Federal Judge Throws Out Trump’s Epstein Birthday Letter Lawsuit – But the Fight Isn’t Over Yet
Whistleblower contacted Democrats before filing Trump complaint that led to first impeachment, records show
Obama CIA chief under DOJ scrutiny pushes fringe Trump ouster plan
Soros-backed prosecutor set for Capitol Hill grilling as sanctuary policies face reckoning
Trump-Impeaching GOP Senator Reportedly Melted Down Over Not Getting Enough Money
Gubernatorial candidate vows to pardon cop convicted of manslaughter in death of fleeing suspect
Bodies of two iron workers recovered from rubble of Philadelphia parking garage 5 days after partial collapse
Tennessee Lawmakers Walk Out of Prayer Against ‘White Christian Nationalism’
Trump’s ‘Blasphemous’ Post Draws Backlash from Christian Conservatives
The simple tax habit that could save you thousands over your lifetime
Lawmakers put expulsion threats atop House agenda as return sets up high-stakes week
Cancer-Stricken Former Republican Sen. Ben Sasse Vows To Avoid Being A ‘Pansy A**’ As Life Slips Away
Melania Trump’s Epstein remarks turn up the heat on DOJ, Acting AG Todd Blanche to do more
Pelosi did not want to wait for the evidence: her decision was driven by political factors.
Likewise, the Intelligence Committee has rushed its proceedings before all of the evidence was available to most members of Congress, or the public. It often published lengthy transcripts of closed-door depositions on the eve of public hearings, and only released the most exculpatory transcript after public hearings were over.
Nadler has given Trump until Friday to respond to a request to participate, either directly or through his counsel, in the Judiciary Committee’s impeachment proceedings.
Story cited here.
