News Opinons Politics

Adam Schiff Gives Democrats Only 24 Hours to Sign Impeachment Report

House Intelligence Committee chairman Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) is giving members of his committee just 24 hours to read and sign off on his report recommending articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump.

As Breitbart News reported Friday, House Judiciary Committee chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler has previewed the report, and suggested it will include claims of “collusion” with Russia — as well as Ukraine, Russia’s enemy.

And as reported Saturday, Schiff will provide the full report to committee members on Monday, who must sign off on Tuesday in time for the first hearing in Nadler’s committee on Wednesday, which will discuss the supposed constitutional and legal basis for impeachment.


It is a foregone conclusion that Democrats will sign off on Schiff’s report. Evidence does not seem to be the top priority for Democrats: a majority favored an impeachment inquiry by August 1, eleven days before the so-called “whistleblower” sent a letter to Schiff complaining about Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky.


Democrats targeted over ‘illegal orders’ video attend Trump State of the Union
Alert: Schumer Gives Chilling 7 Seconds of Press Comments After Iran Briefing – Zero Attacks on Trump, Obvious Worry, Pure Seriousness
Dems Bring Illegal Aliens to State of the Union as Their Guests, Further Degrading the Safety of Trump, Everyone Present
Al Green returns to House chamber for Trump SOTU after dramatic 2025 ejection
Dems tap ICE detainees, suspected illegal immigrants as guests for Trump’s speech: DHS
NYPD releases photos of snowball-wielding suspects with facial hair after Mamdani claims attackers were ‘kids’
DHS backs off plans for new ICE facility in New Hampshire after local pushback, meeting with governor
Peter Mandelson denies ‘baseless’ claim of fleeing UK for British Virgin Islands
Schumer, Dems again block DHS funding, force State of the Union showdown
Pentagon gives AI firm ultimatum: lift military limits by Friday or lose $200M deal
No Democratic candidate secures party endorsement in California governor’s race
‘Big guys, huh?’: Trump hosts US Olympic hockey team ahead of State of the Union
US Men’s Hockey Team Arrives in DC in Patriotic Style Ahead of Trump’s State of the Union
Cowardly Texas Republicans Drop Plan to Honor Charlie Kirk with Highway After Modest Left-Wing Pushback
United Cajun Navy offers search and rescue services in hunt for Nancy Guthrie

See also  Newsom’s office rebuffs ‘MAGA-manufactured outrage’ on his SAT score statement

However, as the Washington Examiner‘s Byron York has noted, Democrats are in such a rush that they are leaving potential facts out of their examination. For example, they could wage a court battle to force former National Security Adviser John Bolton to testify.

Bolton reportedly disapproved of the role played by U.S. Ambassador to the E.U. Gordon Sondland and Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani in relations with Ukraine. He could be a key witness. However, Democrats did not want to wait to hear what he had to say.

As York noted recently in a column titled “Why the rush toward impeachment?”, Democrats “are racing to get the job done by Christmas. They’re not even trying to hear from some key witnesses, like former national security adviser John Bolton, because they don’t want to take the time to go to court over it.”

York notes that Democrats are fearful of letting impeachment drag into the 2020 presidential primary, when it will pull several U.S. Senators off the campaign trail. And they are also worried about the fact that public support for impeachment is stagnant at best, and slipping at worst, after lackluster public hearings last month.

But the rush has been a feature from the very beginning. On the day that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced an impeachment inquiry, the president had already announced that he had declassified the transcript (or “readout”) of the phone call with Zelensky, and that it would be published the next day.

See also  FBI Director Patel says investigators have found antifa funding sources


Democrats targeted over ‘illegal orders’ video attend Trump State of the Union
Alert: Schumer Gives Chilling 7 Seconds of Press Comments After Iran Briefing – Zero Attacks on Trump, Obvious Worry, Pure Seriousness
Dems Bring Illegal Aliens to State of the Union as Their Guests, Further Degrading the Safety of Trump, Everyone Present
Al Green returns to House chamber for Trump SOTU after dramatic 2025 ejection
Dems tap ICE detainees, suspected illegal immigrants as guests for Trump’s speech: DHS
NYPD releases photos of snowball-wielding suspects with facial hair after Mamdani claims attackers were ‘kids’
DHS backs off plans for new ICE facility in New Hampshire after local pushback, meeting with governor
Peter Mandelson denies ‘baseless’ claim of fleeing UK for British Virgin Islands
Schumer, Dems again block DHS funding, force State of the Union showdown
Pentagon gives AI firm ultimatum: lift military limits by Friday or lose $200M deal
No Democratic candidate secures party endorsement in California governor’s race
‘Big guys, huh?’: Trump hosts US Olympic hockey team ahead of State of the Union
US Men’s Hockey Team Arrives in DC in Patriotic Style Ahead of Trump’s State of the Union
Cowardly Texas Republicans Drop Plan to Honor Charlie Kirk with Highway After Modest Left-Wing Pushback
United Cajun Navy offers search and rescue services in hunt for Nancy Guthrie

Pelosi did not want to wait for the evidence: her decision was driven by political factors.

See also  Iowa congressman took cash from Chinese companies buying American farmland

Likewise, the Intelligence Committee has rushed its proceedings before all of the evidence was available to most members of Congress, or the public. It often published lengthy transcripts of closed-door depositions on the eve of public hearings, and only released the most exculpatory transcript after public hearings were over.

Nadler has given Trump until Friday to respond to a request to participate, either directly or through his counsel, in the Judiciary Committee’s impeachment proceedings.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter