News Opinons Politics

Adam Schiff: DOJ’s Decision Doesn’t Exonerate Flynn, But Incriminates AG Barr

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) claimed the Department of Justice’s decision to drop criminal charges against retired Army Lieutenant General Michael Flynn on Thursday does not exonerate the former Trump national security advisor, but rather incriminates Attorney General William Barr.

“Flynn pled guilty to lying to the FBI about his illicit Russian contacts. His lies do not now become truths,” Schiff wrote on Twitter. “This dismissal does not exonerate him. But it does incriminate Bill Barr.”

“In the worst politicization of the Justice Department in its history,” the California Democrat added.


Earlier Thursday, the Justice Department moved to drop its case against Flynn for charges of making false statements to the FBI about his contacts with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak ahead of President Trump taking office. In 2017, the longtime military man pleaded guilty in special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation and agreed to cooperate with the DOJ, but eventually withdrew his plea, citing prosecuting breaking their agreement to not recommend prison time.


Invasion of Texas: Dallas-Fort Worth Airport to Put Islamic Foot Wash Stations in Bathrooms
Watch: CNN Data Analyst Admits People Simply ‘Don’t Care’ About Left-Wing Climate Alarmism Anymore
Justice Department slams ‘politically motivated demands’ of DC Council asking govs to remove National Guard
Mamdani’s openness to campaigning with Hochul shows how far they’ve come
DOJ threatens California with lawsuit over ‘unbroken pattern’ of sexual abuse in women’s prisons
Trump admin marks 15 straight months with zero border releases as apprehensions plunge 94%
Slain NJ mom Brooke Hanlon’s family backs investigators two months after her stabbing death
Postpartum mom Lindsay Clancy on trial for murder brings court to a halt with sudden breakdown
Trump State Department Axes Biden-Era Initiative That Sought to Spread DEI Around the World
Why She Left: Details of Karoline Leavitt’s (Not So) Abrupt Departure and Just How Much Trump Adores Her
California Dem ripped for ‘perverted agenda’ ahead of fundraiser at risqué nightclub
GOP congressman’s ex-wife sues, alleging sensitive image of 2-year-old daughter was posted online
Extremism expert hailed as ‘terrific’ by ex-Biden official slapped with federal charges
Florida State University hit with federal civil rights investigation over race, sex-based scholarship programs
Dinesh D’Souza Shows the Truth of the Bible Through Biblical Archaeology

See also  Don Lemon moves to dismiss case over Minnesota church protest on selective and vindictive prosecution claims

“Through the course of my review of General Flynn’s case, I concluded the proper and just course was to dismiss the case,” Jeffrey Jensen, the U.S. attorney that Barr recruited to review Flynn’s case, said in a statement. “I briefed Attorney General Barr on my findings, advised him on these conclusions, and he agreed.”

Speaking to CBS News, Barr defended the decision to drop the charges against Flynn, saying he was “doing the law’s bidding’

“A crime cannot be established here. They did not have a basis for a counterintelligence investigation against Flynn at that stage,” Barr said in reference to the FBI.

“People sometimes plead to things that turn out not to be crimes,” the chief law enforcement official added.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter