Monday on MSNBC’s “The Last Word,” The New York Times’ Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly, the co-authors of a new book about Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh, said a Times essay about the book initially included a detail about an alleged sexual assault victim involving Kavanaugh. However, was removed in the Times’ editing process.
That detail was that the alleged victim has said she did not remember the incident.
“The Last Word” anchor Lawrence O’Donnell inquired about the omission.
US set to seize tens of millions in Venezuelan oil after tanker interception, White House says
Leavitt accuses CNN reporter of trying to ‘push narratives’ during heated White House exchange
New York to spend millions helping people cope with ‘collective trauma’
Dueling healthcare bills rejected by Senate as Obamacare subsidies set to expire
Bulgarian government toppled by citizens over claims of corruption, embezzlement
Dem rep opens House hearing by telling Noem to resign in fiery statement
BREAKING: Kilmar Abrego Garcia Released by Obama Judge – Freed Despite MS-13, Trafficking, and Wife-Beating Allegations
Republican rift puts spotlight on high-stakes showdown over Trump-driven red state redistricting
Dem Lawmaker Admits ‘I Don’t Feel Good About Being White Every Day,’ Wants to Drag Kids Down with Her
Federal judge orders release of Kilmar Abrego Garcia from ICE custody
DHS Reveals Historic Number Illegal Aliens Left the US in 2025 – Deportations Were Just a Fraction
Fox News ‘Antisemitism Exposed’ Newsletter: NYC braces for British-style taxes, antisemitism
Democratic Congresswoman Accused of Joining Riot and Attempting to ‘Impede Law Enforcement Officers’
Ex-Kentucky sheriff admits to shooting judge but claims he ‘had no control’ over actions: report
Leftist Code Pink founder praise for Marjorie Taylor Greene stuns social media
“In your draft, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” O’Donnell said.
Both Kelly and Pogrebin replied, “It did.”
O’Donnell followed up, “So somewhere in the editing process, those words were dropped?”
“It was in editing, done in haste in the editing process — as you know for closing the section,” Pogrebin replied. “I think what happened, actually, was we had her name and, you know, the Times doesn’t usually include the name of the victim. And so I think in this case the editors felt like maybe it was probably better to remove it. And in removing her name, they removed the other reference to the fact that she didn’t remember it.”
Story cited here.
