NYT Reporters Behind Kavanaugh Story Suggest Key Information Was Removed by Editors

The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

Late Sunday, The New York Times walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” and alleged that there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.

The paper was forced to issue an update that included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault. The newspaper also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no other comment about the episode.

Growing Number of Conservatives Turn on DHS Sec. Markwayne Mullin Over Soft ‘Immigration Reform’ Rhetoric

FIRST ON FOX: Trump to open direct line with military families in ground-up readiness push

Outrage over noncitizens allegedly voting in elections ignites probe into Garden State Dems

To Secure AG Job, Blanche Kills off Anti-Weaponization Fund Designed to Compensate Victims of Gov’t Witch Hunts, Like Most J6ers

Nancy Guthrie ransom notes release follows Unabomber ‘precedent’ that cracked case, expert says

SEE IT: Dashcam shows Florida trooper chasing alleged street takeover suspect at 140 mph

Chris ‘Fredo’ Cuomo Tries Playing Tough Guy for Anthony Fauci, Gets Nuked By Social Media

WNBA Head Coach Protests Sophie Cunningham with ‘Trans Kids’ Shirt During Game

Trump can declare Iran victory now and withdraw troops, former counterterror official argues

Races to watch in Michigan as establishment Democrats face off against challenges on their left flank

Top Trump ally warns super PAC bankrolled by Dem billionaire is meddling in his GOP primary

Trump v. Smithsonian: A timeline of how the White House fight over ‘woke’ history unfolded

First showdown in race for Lindsey Graham’s Senate seat puts GOP hopefuls to the test

Todd Blanche moves closer to confirmation after rescinding $1.8B fund

Deadliest animal in every US state revealed, from moose and bears to dogs

Pogrebin and Kelly said in an interview that information was included in their original draft of the piece.

“In your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article?” MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell asked.

“It did,” both Pogrebin and Kelly responded.

“So somewhere in the editing process, those words were trimmed,” O’Donnell said in clarification.

Pogrebin then explained that The Times doesn’t usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.