News Opinons Politics

Elizabeth Warren Doesn’t Want to Say How She’d Pay for Her Health Care Plan

Elizabeth Warren famously has a plan for everything—everything, that is, except financing the single-payer health care system she says she supports. It’s a telling omission that reveals what happens when Warren’s wonky tendencies come into conflict with her campaign mantras.

Since launching her presidential campaign, the Massachusetts Democrat has rolled out Warren-branded plans for everything from universal childcare to green energy to “economic patriotism.” But on health care, so far, the senator has been content to endorse Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All plan, which would eliminate most private health insurance and set up a government-run health insurance system, without putting forth one of her own.

The Sanders plan would, according to Sanders himself as well as multiple independent estimates, require new government spending totaling somewhere between $30 and $40 trillion a year. While Sanders has outlined ways to offset some of that cost, he hasn’t put forth a plan to fully finance the additional spending. He has, however, made clear that it would require higher taxes on the middle class.



Ex-Indiana deputy charged with felony for allegedly using Flock cameras to stalk girlfriend
House Democrats Panicking as Republicans Prepare to Make Them Go on the Record with Socialism Vote
Six Fascinating, Barely-Known Facts Proving America and Jews/Judaism Have Been Linked Since the Founding
Swimmer rushed to hospital after suspected shark attack at Martha’s Vineyard
Nicki Minaj to star in ‘Shark Tank’- style show for Trump administration
Illegal immigrant’s ‘over-the-top’ sexual assault on elderly woman sends sheriff into rage: ‘Out of control’
Another ActBlue leader pleads Fifth as House investigates alleged foreign donations
Video: Trump Can’t Hold Back After Reporter Asks If He Plans to Nuke a Militarily Defeated Iran: ‘Stupid’
Woke stunt goes horribly wrong as Michigan Dems open convention with brutal ‘land acknowledgment’
Watch: JD Vance Echoes Will Smith in Fiery Response to Abdul El-Sayed’s Comments About Wife
White House brings receipts after media claims noncriminal ICE arrests ‘soaring’: ‘False narratives’
Hasan Piker’s Claim He Doesn’t Hate America Clashes With That Time He Declared ‘I Hate America’
Army Secretary Dan Driscoll Resigns After Internal Disagreements
Ex-House Freedom Caucus chair says GOP isn’t ‘a conservative party anymore,’ but Democrats are ‘worse’
FLASHBACK: Mamdani torched for recycling 9/11 tributes after years of near-identical posts
See also  Grand Canyon flash flood leaves 1 dead and several missing or unaccounted for, park service says

But despite endorsing Sanders’ plan, Warren has repeatedly declined to say that middle-class taxes would have to go up. She dodged the question in earlier debates this year. And at the debate last night, she once again all but refused to answer the question directly.

Instead, she offered a vague promise that “middle-class families are going to pay less” while insisting that “those at the very top—the richest individuals and the biggest corporations—are going to pay more.”

When a debate moderator pressed her specifically on the question of taxes, she still declined to offer a direct response. Families have to deal with “total cost,” she said, reiterating her support for Medicare for All. “Costs are going to go up for wealthier individuals, and costs are going to go up for giant corporations. But for hard-working families across this country, costs are going to go down, and that’s how it should work under Medicare for All in our health care system.” The specific question—Would taxes rise for middle-class families?—remained unanswered.

In part, this is a sign that Warren, though running what is nominally a bold progressive campaign, has adopted the conventional Democratic playbook when it comes to tax hikes. As Russell Berman writes at The Atlantic, in recent years the party’s presidential candidates have tended to adhere to the rule that it’s OK to propose raising taxes on the rich—but not on the broadly defined middle class.


Ex-Indiana deputy charged with felony for allegedly using Flock cameras to stalk girlfriend
House Democrats Panicking as Republicans Prepare to Make Them Go on the Record with Socialism Vote
Six Fascinating, Barely-Known Facts Proving America and Jews/Judaism Have Been Linked Since the Founding
Swimmer rushed to hospital after suspected shark attack at Martha’s Vineyard
Nicki Minaj to star in ‘Shark Tank’- style show for Trump administration
Illegal immigrant’s ‘over-the-top’ sexual assault on elderly woman sends sheriff into rage: ‘Out of control’
Another ActBlue leader pleads Fifth as House investigates alleged foreign donations
Video: Trump Can’t Hold Back After Reporter Asks If He Plans to Nuke a Militarily Defeated Iran: ‘Stupid’
Woke stunt goes horribly wrong as Michigan Dems open convention with brutal ‘land acknowledgment’
Watch: JD Vance Echoes Will Smith in Fiery Response to Abdul El-Sayed’s Comments About Wife
White House brings receipts after media claims noncriminal ICE arrests ‘soaring’: ‘False narratives’
Hasan Piker’s Claim He Doesn’t Hate America Clashes With That Time He Declared ‘I Hate America’
Army Secretary Dan Driscoll Resigns After Internal Disagreements
Ex-House Freedom Caucus chair says GOP isn’t ‘a conservative party anymore,’ but Democrats are ‘worse’
FLASHBACK: Mamdani torched for recycling 9/11 tributes after years of near-identical posts
See also  At March on Washington, an urgent plea for black voters to turn out in the midterm elections

But it’s also a result of the way that Warren has framed her campaign as a kind of populist uprising, one that pits the middle class against the upper crust. Warren’s entire presidential bid, and much of her career as a public figure, is predicated on the notion that her plans will come at no cost to ordinary families and that the costs of her plans will be born solely by the richest of the rich.

This is the story that Warren tells every day. It is the foundation of her presidential bid, and she is apparently unable or unwilling to deviate from it, even when the facts indicate otherwise.

There is little question that Medicare for All would require higher taxes on the middle class. But to admit that would muddle her easy populist narrative, so she goes out of her way to avoid making that admission. As is so often the case for Warren, the simple story is more important than the plain truth.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter