Elizabeth Warren famously has a plan for everything—everything, that is, except financing the single-payer health care system she says she supports. It’s a telling omission that reveals what happens when Warren’s wonky tendencies come into conflict with her campaign mantras.
Since launching her presidential campaign, the Massachusetts Democrat has rolled out Warren-branded plans for everything from universal childcare to green energy to “economic patriotism.” But on health care, so far, the senator has been content to endorse Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All plan, which would eliminate most private health insurance and set up a government-run health insurance system, without putting forth one of her own.
The Sanders plan would, according to Sanders himself as well as multiple independent estimates, require new government spending totaling somewhere between $30 and $40 trillion a year. While Sanders has outlined ways to offset some of that cost, he hasn’t put forth a plan to fully finance the additional spending. He has, however, made clear that it would require higher taxes on the middle class.
Platner campaign putting ‘thumb on scale’ to influence possible replacement, Maine Dem alleges
Former acting DHS secretary warns Chinese criminal organizations are infiltrating America’s hemp industry
America 250 attendees rally behind Trump’s July 4 speech: ‘What we needed to hear’
This Texan led armed ‘community defense’ for leftists. Now he’s serving 100 years behind bars
Trump says Iran ceasefire is ‘over’ after Iranian attacks trigger massive US response
Tyler Robinson’s and Lance Twiggs’ DNA both allegedly found on key evidence in Charlie Kirk’s assassination
US Navy identifies sailor lost in Arabian Sea after helicopter’s emergency water landing
Noncitizen accused of falsely claiming US citizenship before casting federal ballots
Abbott orders probe after Texas hospital advertises ‘birth packages’ in Mexico: ‘Citizenship is not for sale’
Scott Jennings Gives Firsthand Update on Mitch McConnell Mystery
‘Trans’ House Democrat Says Trump’s 2024 ‘They/Them’ Ad Only Worked Because Dems Refused to Counter Message
New explosive allegation rocks Platner campaign still reeling from rape accusation
Dem with White House ambitions ripped after backing two scandal-plagued candidates: ‘Troubling’
DHS buys two California migrant detention centers for $1.5B to boost ICE deportation capacity
Tragic TDS: Dem Lawmaker from One of Poorest Districts in US Says Avoid Trump Accounts That Could Give Poor Kids $250k by Age 18
But despite endorsing Sanders’ plan, Warren has repeatedly declined to say that middle-class taxes would have to go up. She dodged the question in earlier debates this year. And at the debate last night, she once again all but refused to answer the question directly.
Instead, she offered a vague promise that “middle-class families are going to pay less” while insisting that “those at the very top—the richest individuals and the biggest corporations—are going to pay more.”
When a debate moderator pressed her specifically on the question of taxes, she still declined to offer a direct response. Families have to deal with “total cost,” she said, reiterating her support for Medicare for All. “Costs are going to go up for wealthier individuals, and costs are going to go up for giant corporations. But for hard-working families across this country, costs are going to go down, and that’s how it should work under Medicare for All in our health care system.” The specific question—Would taxes rise for middle-class families?—remained unanswered.
In part, this is a sign that Warren, though running what is nominally a bold progressive campaign, has adopted the conventional Democratic playbook when it comes to tax hikes. As Russell Berman writes at The Atlantic, in recent years the party’s presidential candidates have tended to adhere to the rule that it’s OK to propose raising taxes on the rich—but not on the broadly defined middle class.
Platner campaign putting ‘thumb on scale’ to influence possible replacement, Maine Dem alleges
Former acting DHS secretary warns Chinese criminal organizations are infiltrating America’s hemp industry
America 250 attendees rally behind Trump’s July 4 speech: ‘What we needed to hear’
This Texan led armed ‘community defense’ for leftists. Now he’s serving 100 years behind bars
Trump says Iran ceasefire is ‘over’ after Iranian attacks trigger massive US response
Tyler Robinson’s and Lance Twiggs’ DNA both allegedly found on key evidence in Charlie Kirk’s assassination
US Navy identifies sailor lost in Arabian Sea after helicopter’s emergency water landing
Noncitizen accused of falsely claiming US citizenship before casting federal ballots
Abbott orders probe after Texas hospital advertises ‘birth packages’ in Mexico: ‘Citizenship is not for sale’
Scott Jennings Gives Firsthand Update on Mitch McConnell Mystery
‘Trans’ House Democrat Says Trump’s 2024 ‘They/Them’ Ad Only Worked Because Dems Refused to Counter Message
New explosive allegation rocks Platner campaign still reeling from rape accusation
Dem with White House ambitions ripped after backing two scandal-plagued candidates: ‘Troubling’
DHS buys two California migrant detention centers for $1.5B to boost ICE deportation capacity
Tragic TDS: Dem Lawmaker from One of Poorest Districts in US Says Avoid Trump Accounts That Could Give Poor Kids $250k by Age 18
But it’s also a result of the way that Warren has framed her campaign as a kind of populist uprising, one that pits the middle class against the upper crust. Warren’s entire presidential bid, and much of her career as a public figure, is predicated on the notion that her plans will come at no cost to ordinary families and that the costs of her plans will be born solely by the richest of the rich.
This is the story that Warren tells every day. It is the foundation of her presidential bid, and she is apparently unable or unwilling to deviate from it, even when the facts indicate otherwise.
There is little question that Medicare for All would require higher taxes on the middle class. But to admit that would muddle her easy populist narrative, so she goes out of her way to avoid making that admission. As is so often the case for Warren, the simple story is more important than the plain truth.
Story cited here.
