Elizabeth Warren Doesn’t Want to Say How She’d Pay for Her Health Care Plan

Elizabeth Warren famously has a plan for everything—everything, that is, except financing the single-payer health care system she says she supports. It’s a telling omission that reveals what happens when Warren’s wonky tendencies come into conflict with her campaign mantras.

Since launching her presidential campaign, the Massachusetts Democrat has rolled out Warren-branded plans for everything from universal childcare to green energy to “economic patriotism.” But on health care, so far, the senator has been content to endorse Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All plan, which would eliminate most private health insurance and set up a government-run health insurance system, without putting forth one of her own.

The Sanders plan would, according to Sanders himself as well as multiple independent estimates, require new government spending totaling somewhere between $30 and $40 trillion a year. While Sanders has outlined ways to offset some of that cost, he hasn’t put forth a plan to fully finance the additional spending. He has, however, made clear that it would require higher taxes on the middle class.

Florida couple reaches agreement with daughter’s biological parents after alleged IVF mix-up

Florida court says 18-year-olds have same gun rights as other adults

DHS moves all detainees out of ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ amid hurricane concerns

LaGuardia shuts down runway for second time in weeks after pavement issue resurfaces

Man killed after horse-drawn carriage bolts and flips near popular New York City tourist destination

Shocking Report: ‘250,000 Young White Girls’ Victimized by Muslim Rape Gangs

MUST SEE: ICE Officer Lifts Drowning Child Out of Water, Then Saves His Life with CPR – Dems Call People Like Him ‘Gestapo’

Trump switches support in Oklahoma congressional race as formerly endorsed pastor candidate suspends campaign

Trump-endorsed congressional candidate pledges entire $174K salary to wounded Iraq War veteran’s family

‘Something big’: Feds reveal how relatives of suspects in foiled White House UFC plot saw warning signs

FTC alleges influential transgender health organization misled parents about safety of youth treatments

Handwritten Epstein Notes Found, Confirm He Wanted to Hurt Trump as Badly as Possible, Wasn’t Friend at All

Vance rejects claims Trump-Iran deal echoes Obama-era logic as hawks raise alarm

Trump sends Senate GOP reeling with intelligence chief chaos

Op-Ed: Informed Consent Is Lacking for Abortion

But despite endorsing Sanders’ plan, Warren has repeatedly declined to say that middle-class taxes would have to go up. She dodged the question in earlier debates this year. And at the debate last night, she once again all but refused to answer the question directly.

Instead, she offered a vague promise that “middle-class families are going to pay less” while insisting that “those at the very top—the richest individuals and the biggest corporations—are going to pay more.”

When a debate moderator pressed her specifically on the question of taxes, she still declined to offer a direct response. Families have to deal with “total cost,” she said, reiterating her support for Medicare for All. “Costs are going to go up for wealthier individuals, and costs are going to go up for giant corporations. But for hard-working families across this country, costs are going to go down, and that’s how it should work under Medicare for All in our health care system.” The specific question—Would taxes rise for middle-class families?—remained unanswered.

In part, this is a sign that Warren, though running what is nominally a bold progressive campaign, has adopted the conventional Democratic playbook when it comes to tax hikes. As Russell Berman writes at The Atlantic, in recent years the party’s presidential candidates have tended to adhere to the rule that it’s OK to propose raising taxes on the rich—but not on the broadly defined middle class.