Elizabeth Warren Doesn’t Want to Say How She’d Pay for Her Health Care Plan

Elizabeth Warren famously has a plan for everything—everything, that is, except financing the single-payer health care system she says she supports. It’s a telling omission that reveals what happens when Warren’s wonky tendencies come into conflict with her campaign mantras.

Since launching her presidential campaign, the Massachusetts Democrat has rolled out Warren-branded plans for everything from universal childcare to green energy to “economic patriotism.” But on health care, so far, the senator has been content to endorse Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All plan, which would eliminate most private health insurance and set up a government-run health insurance system, without putting forth one of her own.

The Sanders plan would, according to Sanders himself as well as multiple independent estimates, require new government spending totaling somewhere between $30 and $40 trillion a year. While Sanders has outlined ways to offset some of that cost, he hasn’t put forth a plan to fully finance the additional spending. He has, however, made clear that it would require higher taxes on the middle class.

USDA immediately suspends all federal funding to Minnesota amid fraud investigation

Fox News Politics Newsletter: AOC accuses Vance of believing ‘American people should be assassinated’

Tim Walz Fumes About ‘Accountability’ in Shooting Death of Renee Good – He Should Start by Looking in a Mirror

New top Democrat on House CCP committee took cash from China-linked donors

DC pipe bomb defendant pleads not guilty to federal charges

Watch: Top Chicago Cop Blasts Dem, Media Narrative on Renee Good Shooting, Comes to Defense of ICE Agents Being Attacked with Cars

Fox News True Crime Newsletter: Ohio dentist murders, Kohberger sister’s warning, ‘Torso Killer’ confession

Trump pauses oil exec summit to peek at White House ballroom’s progress

Johnson meets with Muslim man who confronted, disarmed Bondi Beach attacker

Iranian officials have few options if they flee an overthrown regime

WATCH: Bodycam for Ohio dentist murders shows police went to wrong home before couple was found dead

Walz Rages That ICE Won’t Share Shooting Evidence With Sanctuary City Minneapolis – Which Outright Refuses to Cooperate With ICE

House Republicans defend ICE agent in fatal shooting, say use of force was justified

California leads multistate lawsuit against Trump over child care funding freeze

Obama Presidential Center job listings push ‘anti-racism’ pledge ahead of opening

But despite endorsing Sanders’ plan, Warren has repeatedly declined to say that middle-class taxes would have to go up. She dodged the question in earlier debates this year. And at the debate last night, she once again all but refused to answer the question directly.

Instead, she offered a vague promise that “middle-class families are going to pay less” while insisting that “those at the very top—the richest individuals and the biggest corporations—are going to pay more.”

When a debate moderator pressed her specifically on the question of taxes, she still declined to offer a direct response. Families have to deal with “total cost,” she said, reiterating her support for Medicare for All. “Costs are going to go up for wealthier individuals, and costs are going to go up for giant corporations. But for hard-working families across this country, costs are going to go down, and that’s how it should work under Medicare for All in our health care system.” The specific question—Would taxes rise for middle-class families?—remained unanswered.

In part, this is a sign that Warren, though running what is nominally a bold progressive campaign, has adopted the conventional Democratic playbook when it comes to tax hikes. As Russell Berman writes at The Atlantic, in recent years the party’s presidential candidates have tended to adhere to the rule that it’s OK to propose raising taxes on the rich—but not on the broadly defined middle class.