Elizabeth Warren Doesn’t Want to Say How She’d Pay for Her Health Care Plan

Elizabeth Warren famously has a plan for everything—everything, that is, except financing the single-payer health care system she says she supports. It’s a telling omission that reveals what happens when Warren’s wonky tendencies come into conflict with her campaign mantras.

Since launching her presidential campaign, the Massachusetts Democrat has rolled out Warren-branded plans for everything from universal childcare to green energy to “economic patriotism.” But on health care, so far, the senator has been content to endorse Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All plan, which would eliminate most private health insurance and set up a government-run health insurance system, without putting forth one of her own.

The Sanders plan would, according to Sanders himself as well as multiple independent estimates, require new government spending totaling somewhere between $30 and $40 trillion a year. While Sanders has outlined ways to offset some of that cost, he hasn’t put forth a plan to fully finance the additional spending. He has, however, made clear that it would require higher taxes on the middle class.

Another Country Singer Betrays: Built Career on Decent Fans, Now Zach Bryan Trades Them for Terror Apologists

DNA testing confirms body of flight attendant who was killed and thrown from bridge

Watch: Tom Homan Leaves CBS Journalist Speechless, Frozen on Camera With Simple ICE Question He Can’t Answer

Lethal injection survivor Christa Pike’s former satanist boyfriend could be released in 5 years

NYT columnist thrashed online for suggesting Trump is to blame for alleged Cornell gang rape

Millions saved by blocking dead people payouts as Trump Treasury drops hammer on federal fraud

‘Project 1619’ Marxist Creator’s Full Degeneracy Revealed: Her Sick Response When Daughter Told Her She Wanted to Be the Best

Watch: The Priceless Moment Fetterman Accidentally Declares He’s a Lifelong Republican – So Would He Be a Good One?

Battle over Daylight Saving Time erupts as push to stop changing clocks hits Senate wall

President Trump endorses Wyoming’s secretary of state for US House of Representatives

Roger Marshall wants you to know he’s a real Kansan: Fishing, back roads, and a cabin called home

Rob Wittman’s long Washington run faces a tough test in Virginia

NYPD detective released from hospital after being stabbed multiple times in Bronx

Massachusetts felon pleads guilty after DOJ says he sold Russian plutonium to 67 customers

Nobu chef killed after teen driver crashes into parked car in California

But despite endorsing Sanders’ plan, Warren has repeatedly declined to say that middle-class taxes would have to go up. She dodged the question in earlier debates this year. And at the debate last night, she once again all but refused to answer the question directly.

Instead, she offered a vague promise that “middle-class families are going to pay less” while insisting that “those at the very top—the richest individuals and the biggest corporations—are going to pay more.”

When a debate moderator pressed her specifically on the question of taxes, she still declined to offer a direct response. Families have to deal with “total cost,” she said, reiterating her support for Medicare for All. “Costs are going to go up for wealthier individuals, and costs are going to go up for giant corporations. But for hard-working families across this country, costs are going to go down, and that’s how it should work under Medicare for All in our health care system.” The specific question—Would taxes rise for middle-class families?—remained unanswered.

In part, this is a sign that Warren, though running what is nominally a bold progressive campaign, has adopted the conventional Democratic playbook when it comes to tax hikes. As Russell Berman writes at The Atlantic, in recent years the party’s presidential candidates have tended to adhere to the rule that it’s OK to propose raising taxes on the rich—but not on the broadly defined middle class.