Elizabeth Warren Doesn’t Want to Say How She’d Pay for Her Health Care Plan

Elizabeth Warren famously has a plan for everything—everything, that is, except financing the single-payer health care system she says she supports. It’s a telling omission that reveals what happens when Warren’s wonky tendencies come into conflict with her campaign mantras.

Since launching her presidential campaign, the Massachusetts Democrat has rolled out Warren-branded plans for everything from universal childcare to green energy to “economic patriotism.” But on health care, so far, the senator has been content to endorse Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All plan, which would eliminate most private health insurance and set up a government-run health insurance system, without putting forth one of her own.

The Sanders plan would, according to Sanders himself as well as multiple independent estimates, require new government spending totaling somewhere between $30 and $40 trillion a year. While Sanders has outlined ways to offset some of that cost, he hasn’t put forth a plan to fully finance the additional spending. He has, however, made clear that it would require higher taxes on the middle class.

Florida man arrested in wealthy beach town over alleged TikTok school-shooting threat

‘Armed and dangerous’ inmate escapes Atlanta hospital, steals gun and SUV: police

White House Releases Trump’s MRI Results

Jill Biden’s Nightmarish Christmas Display Goes Viral as Melania Trump Unveils Classy Holiday Decor

WV gov gives update on wounded guardsman, talks future of DC mission as general says troops are grieving

Trump MRI results drop as White House confronts mounting questions over president’s health

Melania Trump debuts ‘Home Is Where The Heart Is’ as White House 2025 Christmas theme

Indiana GOP unveils draft of congressional map that carves up Indianapolis

Muslim Father and Sons Charged with Brutally Murdering Daughter for Her ‘Western’ Lifestyle

Playing God: Bill Gates Pushes Use of Sun-Dimming Technology at ‘Climate Tipping Point’

Appeals court finds Alina Habba unlawfully served as New Jersey prosecutor

NFL Coaching Legend Blasts Massive Issue He Saw While Watching Thanksgiving Games

Trump hit with setback as court rules Alina Habba unlawfully served as top federal prosecutor in New Jersey

Trump Admin Negotiators Make High-Stakes Visit to Russia After ‘Successful’ Ukraine Meeting

Reporter’s Notebook: Tennessee special election eyed as Trump referendum ahead of midterms

But despite endorsing Sanders’ plan, Warren has repeatedly declined to say that middle-class taxes would have to go up. She dodged the question in earlier debates this year. And at the debate last night, she once again all but refused to answer the question directly.

Instead, she offered a vague promise that “middle-class families are going to pay less” while insisting that “those at the very top—the richest individuals and the biggest corporations—are going to pay more.”

When a debate moderator pressed her specifically on the question of taxes, she still declined to offer a direct response. Families have to deal with “total cost,” she said, reiterating her support for Medicare for All. “Costs are going to go up for wealthier individuals, and costs are going to go up for giant corporations. But for hard-working families across this country, costs are going to go down, and that’s how it should work under Medicare for All in our health care system.” The specific question—Would taxes rise for middle-class families?—remained unanswered.

In part, this is a sign that Warren, though running what is nominally a bold progressive campaign, has adopted the conventional Democratic playbook when it comes to tax hikes. As Russell Berman writes at The Atlantic, in recent years the party’s presidential candidates have tended to adhere to the rule that it’s OK to propose raising taxes on the rich—but not on the broadly defined middle class.