Elizabeth Warren Doesn’t Want to Say How She’d Pay for Her Health Care Plan

Elizabeth Warren famously has a plan for everything—everything, that is, except financing the single-payer health care system she says she supports. It’s a telling omission that reveals what happens when Warren’s wonky tendencies come into conflict with her campaign mantras.

Since launching her presidential campaign, the Massachusetts Democrat has rolled out Warren-branded plans for everything from universal childcare to green energy to “economic patriotism.” But on health care, so far, the senator has been content to endorse Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All plan, which would eliminate most private health insurance and set up a government-run health insurance system, without putting forth one of her own.

The Sanders plan would, according to Sanders himself as well as multiple independent estimates, require new government spending totaling somewhere between $30 and $40 trillion a year. While Sanders has outlined ways to offset some of that cost, he hasn’t put forth a plan to fully finance the additional spending. He has, however, made clear that it would require higher taxes on the middle class.

Hackers tied to Iran breach FBI director’s personal email and post private images

Secret Service agent assigned to Jill Biden injured in ‘negligent discharge’ at Philadelphia airport

AOC says politicians, especially Democrats, should promise not to accept ‘AI money’

Sheridan Gorman’s university newspaper touts ICE tracker after freshman allegedly murdered by illegal alien

Movie Review: Hopeful Comedy ‘Home Delivery’ Delivers Heart, Laughs, and Free Admission for Expectant Mothers

Savannah Guthrie to return to Today show after absence

‘Maybe It Wasn’t a Bug…’ Internet Weighs In on Man Who Discovered He Could Access 7,000 Robotic Vacuums

Battleground Dem candidate linked public displays of faith to political violence in 2023 speech

Senate passes overnight bill to fund most of Homeland Security as fight nears end and more top headlines

Fetterman tells far-left prosecutor to ‘lighten up’ after threatening to arrest ICE agents over raids

FTC commissioner likens American Bar Association to ‘communist party’ over far-left advocacy

NHL’s Nashville Predators Unveil New LGBT Logo, and It Doesn’t Land the Way They Hoped

Just In: Trump’s Legacy Will Now Appear on All New US Currency

Sorely needed US housing supply expansion may run through 3D printed homes

Israel has recognized Somaliland. Will the US follow?

But despite endorsing Sanders’ plan, Warren has repeatedly declined to say that middle-class taxes would have to go up. She dodged the question in earlier debates this year. And at the debate last night, she once again all but refused to answer the question directly.

Instead, she offered a vague promise that “middle-class families are going to pay less” while insisting that “those at the very top—the richest individuals and the biggest corporations—are going to pay more.”

When a debate moderator pressed her specifically on the question of taxes, she still declined to offer a direct response. Families have to deal with “total cost,” she said, reiterating her support for Medicare for All. “Costs are going to go up for wealthier individuals, and costs are going to go up for giant corporations. But for hard-working families across this country, costs are going to go down, and that’s how it should work under Medicare for All in our health care system.” The specific question—Would taxes rise for middle-class families?—remained unanswered.

In part, this is a sign that Warren, though running what is nominally a bold progressive campaign, has adopted the conventional Democratic playbook when it comes to tax hikes. As Russell Berman writes at The Atlantic, in recent years the party’s presidential candidates have tended to adhere to the rule that it’s OK to propose raising taxes on the rich—but not on the broadly defined middle class.