Elizabeth Warren Doesn’t Want to Say How She’d Pay for Her Health Care Plan

Elizabeth Warren famously has a plan for everything—everything, that is, except financing the single-payer health care system she says she supports. It’s a telling omission that reveals what happens when Warren’s wonky tendencies come into conflict with her campaign mantras.

Since launching her presidential campaign, the Massachusetts Democrat has rolled out Warren-branded plans for everything from universal childcare to green energy to “economic patriotism.” But on health care, so far, the senator has been content to endorse Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All plan, which would eliminate most private health insurance and set up a government-run health insurance system, without putting forth one of her own.

The Sanders plan would, according to Sanders himself as well as multiple independent estimates, require new government spending totaling somewhere between $30 and $40 trillion a year. While Sanders has outlined ways to offset some of that cost, he hasn’t put forth a plan to fully finance the additional spending. He has, however, made clear that it would require higher taxes on the middle class.

Macron slams Trump for ‘stupid’ comments about French riots and warns public of ‘foreign manipulation’

Ilhan Omar finally emerges after DC raid with video pleading for cash to fight Trump

Ilhan Omar, Missing Since Her Home Was Raided, Emerges to Beg for Money on TikTok

Veteran, 81, Shot Dead While Driving Mobility Scooter at Georgia Walmart, Police Make Arrest

Secret sex video rocks University of North Carolina at Charlotte fraternity, 1 arrested: Police

Slain New Jersey mom’s autopsy report released months after stabbing death at home: report

Thune makes bold prediction about Republicans’ Senate chances as GOP pulls millions from key races

Australian politician struck by car in violent attack loses both legs

Town Gave Muslim School Permission to Bring In 90 Students, Then It Went Rogue and Brought in Hundreds More

Les Republicans Pounce! Media Denounces ‘Far Right’ Candidate in France For Noticing Riots Are a Bad Thing

How Saudi Arabia’s defense vulnerabilities could become Trump’s problem amid Houthi onslaught

Talarico has made strides to lock down black voters. They could still cost him the Texas Senate race

Major transgender Supreme Court victory could be undone by movement’s own lawfare, experts say

Maine Democrats fret over Troy Jackson’s guarded Senate campaign

Alabama governor commutes death sentence as doubts emerge about evidence in murder conviction

But despite endorsing Sanders’ plan, Warren has repeatedly declined to say that middle-class taxes would have to go up. She dodged the question in earlier debates this year. And at the debate last night, she once again all but refused to answer the question directly.

Instead, she offered a vague promise that “middle-class families are going to pay less” while insisting that “those at the very top—the richest individuals and the biggest corporations—are going to pay more.”

When a debate moderator pressed her specifically on the question of taxes, she still declined to offer a direct response. Families have to deal with “total cost,” she said, reiterating her support for Medicare for All. “Costs are going to go up for wealthier individuals, and costs are going to go up for giant corporations. But for hard-working families across this country, costs are going to go down, and that’s how it should work under Medicare for All in our health care system.” The specific question—Would taxes rise for middle-class families?—remained unanswered.

In part, this is a sign that Warren, though running what is nominally a bold progressive campaign, has adopted the conventional Democratic playbook when it comes to tax hikes. As Russell Berman writes at The Atlantic, in recent years the party’s presidential candidates have tended to adhere to the rule that it’s OK to propose raising taxes on the rich—but not on the broadly defined middle class.