The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Accused Murderer’s Lawyer Under Fire for Filing AI-Generated Court Docs That Included ‘Fabricated Quotes’
Man Finds Himself Hallucinating in a Hospital After Asking ChatGPT for Dietary Advice
GOP Senator Has a Blunt Question for the NFL Over Hiring of Effeminate Male Cheerleaders, Asks ‘What the H*** Are You Doing?’
1 dead, 4 wounded after shooting in New York City, police say
Gov. Pritzker says Trump trying to ‘manufacture a crisis’ as admin plans National Guard deployment to Chicago
Ted Cruz endorses Chip Roy for Texas attorney general: ‘No one better’
Florida woman arrested for unlicensed dental work allegedly used superglue on victims’ teeth: police
America’s last surviving WWII ace Navy fighter pilot Donald McPherson dies at 103 years old
Columbia University student among 5 killed in New York tour bus crash after Niagara Falls visit
Here’s What the Illegal ‘Maryland Man’ Is Up To Following His Release
Clinton-Appointed Federal Judge Rules Against Unsealing of Epstein Grand Jury Transcripts
Mamdani seemingly takes swipe at scandals surrounding Eric Adams in new video: ‘I have something to hide’
Op-Ed: Democrats’ ‘No Matter What’ Approach Destroyed American Political Discourse
Rubio’s major immigration move praised by conservative experts: ‘Long overdue’
Op-Ed: The Big Beautiful Bill’s Carbon Capture Tax Credit Is a Corporate Giveaway
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
