The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Former Arizona state Dem lawmaker gets a year in prison for sexual misconduct with a minor
Newsom gets hilarious reality check after turning to public for new state coin design
Just in: Houston Texans Star Injured in Shooting, Forcing Team to Break Bad News
Harvey Weinstein Rushed to Hospital After Heath Issues Were ‘Triggered’
Trump, DeSantis meet privately for several hours in Miami
Mom of Chiefs Fan Who Froze in Friend’s Backyard Slams Investigation – ‘There Should Be Some Charges’
Catholic Organization Creates AI ‘Priest,’ Defrocks Him Almost Immediately After Public Outcry Over Specific Detail
Colleges claim not all protesters getting arrested are part of their school communities: ‘Outside groups’
Defiant Kristi Noem defends killing farm pup amid criticism from Dems and GOP
Director Speaks Out on ‘Scary’ Johnny Depp Remarks, Feels ‘Betrayed’ with Media Revisionism
Trump and DeSantis Meet Privately in Florida for ‘Several Hours’ as VP Speculation Grows
Kirby: US remains hopeful for ‘6 weeks of peace’ with hostage deal that ‘Hamas has not fully rejected’
White House denies secret plot to oust Karine Jean-Pierre as Biden faces more bad news
Newsom Asks Public to Help Design New California Coin, Instantly Regrets It
Fetterman blasts ‘germ of antisemitism’ in college protests, ‘living in a pup tent for Hamas’ not helpful
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
Scroll down to leave a comment:
