The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
Madagascar’s president flees country following Gen Z protests
Ellen Greenberg’s controversial death ruled suicide again, new report ‘deeply flawed’ says lawyer
Jeffries tells Lawler to ‘keep your mouth shut’ as shutdown sparks Capitol Hill confrontations
Ex-Louisiana Democratic Gov. John Bel Edwards says he won’t run for Senate
Man Charged with Killing His Daughter’s Alleged Rapist Launches Campaign for County Sheriff
Witkoff family to host fundraiser for Nate Morris, Ramaswamy to speak
Watch: Trump-Macron Handshake Turns Into a Grappling Session at Gaza Peace Summit
Investigators release video of possible abduction, showing woman screaming as she’s pulled away
Thune draws flak for ‘Native American Day’ post
Pakistan announces intention for second Nobel Peace Prize nomination for Trump over Gaza ceasefire role
Mamdani breaks silence on freed Israeli hostages in statement that doesn’t mention Trump
Trump Likened to Ancient Biblical Ruler Who Came to Aid of Israel, As Hostages Released, Peace Deal Signed
Ciattarelli team blasts opponent over ‘slanderous’ claim he profited from opioid deaths
North Carolina GOP plans vote on redrawing state’s House map
PepsiCo Announces ‘MAHA’ Makeovers for Doritos and Cheetos
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
