The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether plans by the Trump administration to end the so-called DACA program for young undocumented immigrants can proceed.
The justices announced Friday they will hear oral arguments on the appeal in its next term, which begins in October. A ruling is expected in the presidential election year, putting the high court at the center of one of the most politically charged issues.
Federal appeals courts around the country have rejected efforts by the federal government to move ahead with phasing out the Obama-era program, known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.
DACA was created under executive order, and gives some illegal immigrants — known as “Dreamers” — who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
The Trump administration in 2017 announced its plan to phase out the program, but federal courts have ruled that the phase-out could not apply retroactively and that the program should be restarted.
State of Georgia Halts Poultry Sales
LA Hughes Fire only 14% contained after burning 10K acres
GOP leaders rally to revoke China’s ‘most favored nation’ status after 20-year run
Honor Guard Sergeant Who Gave Melania a Twirl on Inauguration Night Speaks Out: ‘I Was Overwhelmed with Joy’
Nashville police investigate high school shooting suspect’s ‘very concerning’ internet and social media posts
7 San Antonio police officers shot in confrontation with suspect with 3 prior arrests
European right wing bringing MAGA abroad: ‘Europe cannot miss this train’
Hotel Guests Try to Recreate Scene from ‘Home Alone 2’, But the Fun Stops When They’re Handed the Bill
Philadelphia Mayor’s Attempt to Cheer on the Eagles Goes Terribly Wrong When She Makes Grade School Mistake
Trump’s ‘shock and awe’: Forget first 100 days, new president shows off frenetic pace in first 100 hours
‘Ultra-right’: Trump budget chief pick Russell Vought faces fire from Dem senators
‘Totally prepared’: Trump allies say he’s better positioned than ever to enact agenda
Guatemalan man illegally in US accused of sexually abusing Alabama child shows no remorse: ‘It is what it is’
Marco Rubio heading to Panama on first trip as secretary of state: ‘We won’t continue to ignore the region’
Tennessee school shooter who killed 1, injured another identified as teen student: police
The White House fought back on those decisions, saying the president has broad authority over immigration enforcement policy.
DACA proponents have also argued that Trump’s planned termination of the program violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees.
The Supreme Court took the unusual step of taking up the cases before they had been fully heard at the lower court level.
The cases are DHS v. Regents of the University of California (18-587); Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (18-588); and McAlleenan v. Vidal (18-589).
Story cited here.
