This morning, Democratic presidential candidate and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) tweeted out his support for efforts to unionize the video game industry. He did so in a fashion truly appropriate for the man—one that made it clear that he doesn’t always grasp basic economics:
The video game industry made $43 billion in revenue last year. The workers responsible for that profit deserve to collectively bargain as part of a union. I'm glad to see unions like @IATSE and the broader @GameWorkers movement organizing such workers. https://t.co/Ia5gMG2v0w
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) June 18, 2019
Mississippi homecoming turns deadly: 4 Killed, 12 Injured in downtown Leland shooting
Conservative PAC Has Been Keeping Track of Educators Who Cheered Charlie Kirk’s Murder
Veteran journalist flips script on media ‘running cover’ for Antifa violence: ‘Anarchist communism’
New York Republicans blast Schumer, Gillibrand over shutdown: ‘You’ve abdicated your responsibility’
Former detective says string of Houston deaths may be linked to alleged ‘Smiley Face’ killer network
Lefties Ecstatic Trump Didn’t Win Nobel Peace Prize, Forget Uselessness of Award or What Recipient Did
World War II-Era Bomb Found at One of Country’s Busiest Ports, Marines Respond
Teacher Arrested After She Allegedly Added Student on Snapchat, Called Him from Her Shower, and Tried to Meet Up
Trump mass layoffs show he isn’t bluffing on shutdown threats
Dems fundraise off government shutdown as Hakeem Jeffries urges supporters to ‘keep the faith’
Republican lawmakers launch investigation into California fire charity funds
Democrats under fire for standing by Virginia AG hopeful who joked about shooting GOP rival
UN makes a mockery of human rights as China, Iran score gig on wayward committee
US judge vows to rule ‘soon’ on Abrego Garcia’s fate after marathon hearing
Trump declared in ‘excellent overall health’ by doctor after Walter Reed visit
In the tweet, Sanders confuses “revenue” with “profit.” This is not an insignificant mistake, but it’s one that is common in reporting about large American corporations. All too often, reporters talk about how much money a company takes in without offering any analysis of that company’s expenses. Amazon, for example, despite massive revenues has only recently begun making an actual profit. In the Time story that Sanders links to, writer Alana Semuels similarly fails to differentiate between revenue and profit when covering the efforts to organize.
It’s true that the game industry did bring in $42 billion in revenue last year from customers in the United States (and nearly $140 billion worldwide). But revenue is the money a company brings in before deducting its expenses, like, for example, workers’ wages. So, in reality, video game industry workers did get a cut of those billions. It’s only after such workers are paid (and other expenses are deducted) that we can talk about profit.
Sanders, of course, has a long history of failing to grasp the basics of market economics. He frequently sees marketplace choices as a threat, even as they open avenues and opportunities for our poorest citizens or provide all of us with ever improving mass entertainment.
Story cited here.