Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Utah hunter finds skeletal remains of man missing since 2019 in remote mountains
Republicans believe college campus chaos works in their favor
War veteran in crucial battleground race expands campaign, sets sights firmly on vulnerable Democrat
White House looks to convince Americans of ‘Bidenomics’ with Kamala Harris tour
Laws protecting children from online porn are winning in some states as activists push nationwide solution
Crash outside White House security barrier leaves 1 dead: Police
Class Warfare: IRS Promises to Increase Audits of ‘Wealthy’ Taxpayers by at Least 50% – Report
Stock Drops Like a Rock After Woke CEO Says He’s ‘Eager’ to Hire Anti-Israel Protesters
‘Irrevocably Shaken’: Why Columbia Law Review Editors Are Demanding Cancellation of Exams
Jack Smith’s Team Admits They Tampered with Key Evidence in Trump’s Case, Misled the Court About It
GOP Governor Declares War on Lab-Grown Meat, Signs Law Making Distribution, Sale, Manufacture Illegal
Columbia president calls last 2 weeks ‘among the most difficult’ in school’s history amid anti-Israel protests
White House Mocked for ‘Cringe’ Luke Skywalker Press Briefing Appearance
Bidenomics Is Killing the American Dream of Owning Your Own Home Nationwide – Study
Anti-Israel groups accuse Chicago, DNC of trying to ‘protect’ Biden from protests at 2024 Dem convention
In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.
In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.
Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.
Story cited here.
Scroll down to leave a comment:
